"God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve! Well, he made Adam and Eve AND Adam and Steve AND Madam and Eve; God made Adam and Eve! Not Abdulla and Stefani! Death to all Muslims!; God made Adam and Eve, not abortion, so say no to abortion"
Oh, I just love the "God made" arguments, because they're used people people with brains of CRAP.
Jesus is coming? Why? What difference will that make? Will he bring stuff, or come empty handed? Will he expect lodging? How will that actually work?
Sorry, but this idea is just another bizarre angle of Christian fundamentalism that makes no sense. It wasn't until 300 years after the crucifixion that Scriptures included any mention about a resurrection. For 300 years no mention of it! Why is that?
Jesus is either late, or he can't make it. There's no one coming. Face it and move on.
over to the gov. including your kids. You do not need a permit to love someone. God is pure love, keep up his power. LOVE anyone & everyone. Love does not
fuck obama and all corrupt hacks. Just because a person does not like homosexuality does not make that person homophobes. I am a conservative lesbian and I hate what malicious gays are doing by harassing church members and throwing condoms on church floors. People don't have to accept the fact I am gay. I don't expect them to change their opinion about the issue. This country has bigger issues than gay issues, like national security. Keeping jobs. Our prez and congress are destroying both.
Fuck I hate living in Florida. That dumb-fuck amendment 2 doesn't just keep Gays from joining in Civil Unions but straight people to. But the fucking churches saw their chance and pretty much, had being gay in Florida, banned.
That's why it's called an assumption cock face, nobody trashes their own hood... well almost nobody... but really, get out of Florida, if you don't like it here, we don't need you here.
if you weren't half retarded, you would realize that hood is an abbreviated form of neighborhood. I didn't think I would have to spell that out for you, sorry. As for the butt smell, that's from the shit staining your face after all the salads you've tossed.
Heyz! Iz you'z a lez mrz. ladiez? I'mz iz very edumacated n luv you'z biased reports (does that 's' belong 'reports'?)! I'mz believez in Godz and I believe in Ba'rock! ...I hope...
Why are people who disagree with gay marriage called homophobes? I do not fear gays; I simply disagree with them about marriage. What's next abortionphobes?
SHOULD be free to marry. They cant do it legally yet which sucks big time and is a ridiculous law. I agree marriage is a long-term commitment entered into by two people in love. Notice how i specify PEOPLE rather man and woman.
we elected a bunch of crooks from chicago, that is all that was done. now we get to see how the crooks work there magic, get your gun and beans ready.
You have information that she accepts money for sex? I think not. Just 'cos a woman holds views which you do not warrant calling her a whore. And what's so 'whore-like' about being a Liberal? The tides has turned on the Neo Conservative project. It ended with the Credit Crunch.
I'm concerned about freedom of speech. A judges vote meant the re-definition of marriage, so just because he's a judge he's right and every religious person before him was wrong...
They're going to tell us what to believe and make it against the law to speak out about our sincerely held religious beliefs - it's not against scripture to be black, the 'same as race' argument is wrong
You can love anyone you want, you really can, don't ask for my seal of approval
Marriage has been redefined many times. Slaves couldn't legally marry. Fifty years ago many states said blacks couldn't marry whites. Those aren't the only ways marriage has changed.
It used to be against scripture to be black. Both the Old and New Testaments condone slavery. Noah's cursed son was used to justify enslaving blacks. For the Mormons, being black was a mark of Laman's curse... at least until VERY recently.
In canada right now, religious groups have to have their messages edited to make sure nobody says anything to bother homosexuals and muslims, by government mandate. It isn't freedom of speech without being able to voice a real opinion
This is about states rights (keeping the federal government constitutionally limited), freedom of speech, and for the other side- respect. They are free to love who they want, and they demand approval.
you're ignorant about scripture and mormonism is a cult
Canada doesn't have our First Amendment or our traditions of jurisprudence. It's not illegal to speak out if you sincerely believe interracial marriage is un-Christian. Of course, people will rightly think you're a bigot.
You talk about respect and then bear false witness against me by saying I'm ignorant about Scripture. I've read the Bible and taken both Christian and Jewish courses on it.
Whether Mormonism is a cult or not, they were a major player in passing Prop 8. They're on your side.
NO ONE is asking for your personal seal of approval as far as your religious beliefs go. No one is asking for the religioug seal of approval. They are asking for a LEGAL seal of approval. Seperation of church and state dumbass.
So what's wrong with creating the community the majority of voters in those states obviously want? I personally don't have an issue with gays marrying or recogizing it as such. I do, however, have a big f'ing problem with people thinking every state should be the same. People don't hold the same values everywhere, get over it. If you want gay marriage recognized by the courts, etc., you have Connecticut to live in or any of the other states that don't seem to think it's an issue.
1. Justifying irresponsibility with the "Pro Choice" flag is ultimately detrimental to our society and completely immoral in all aspects of the word.
2. Let them have unions or partnerships or whatever certified...but don't you think changing the literal definition of words so as to not "hurt their feelings" or "make them feel included" is sort of stupid? Get over it. You lost in CA. Ain't democracy a bitch? Notice that if it would have been in favor they'd criticize others for protests
i voted NO on 8 !!!! cuz i dont care what gay ppl do!!! if getting married is what they want !! well let them have that!!! we should all be treated equal!!!
Great video. Good points. You made it fresh and interesting so that even though I already agree with you I enjoyed hearing your point-of-view. Some of the comments here are weird and creepy lol.
1. Sad! Apparently, the foundation of psychiatry removed homosexuality from its lists of mental problems in only the 60s &, [it is] only recently that the U.S. has seen its first colored president! Racism nearly certifies that he be at least a B president. Also noteworthy of mention: in the US many states will put s.o. to death even if found legally insane. In many other countries, they dont even have a death penalty!
(gosh, my comment sounded really mean! But, who better 2come from than some complete stranger who u can either 1, brush off as a completely inconsiderate fool/freak or, two, b mad at but take into account. I guess ther r other options but, hopefully u'll c that Im only trying to make a suggestion. N most of your videos you wear sleeveless tops that r open on the top. U are very pretty, of course... & ur fashion choices r none of my business. I just mean... it doesnt seem best, maybe. I dunno.
Because it unnaturally caters to the idea that first, wearing such clothes is 'good'. If not, second, that we actually prefer such attire. Third, consider that these videos are made by several people; they are reviewed and like most broadcasts: recited, practiced & scrutinized. Her shirts are not an accident. They are chosen that way for many reasons.
2. However, as others may not have noticed or thought about it, I in fact have seen that she has been making an effort at improving not just her delivery but also her posture and more subtly; her conversational psychology. So, if she wants to be a news reporter--well, most news stations have another protocol than that. Generally they dress more 'business' versus more 'cute girl tops'.
3. I do not expect you to believe the objective modifications I myself have identified; mostly I think people just come to listen to their stuff. I, on the other hand, have noticed things like her always wearing sleeveless shirts. Should not the question be, WHY does she always wear sleeveless shirts?--I think that was the question you didn't ask. :)
1. The last thing I want to be looking at is some woman's breasts or some ideal visage because the broadcasting agency thinks me unable to attend the NEWS they deliver unless by such means. With that, I am basically against that sexual trait of cinema called HOLLYWOOD!. Take... Angelina Jolie. Let's say she is some great actress and we just LOVE her--yeah!.
2. Why isn't it just that she is really pretty and everyone likes to watch really pretty people? Acting and sexual appeal are certainly different subjects in my book. Yet, in American & British cinema, the later has for some time been taking over the former.
Now, of course we can see cultural aspirations in countless folk, we can see identity aims, and of course contextual desires.
3. I speak of the later when I mention her wanting to be a journalist or the like. She is a journalist now. Of course, this means she strives (or hopes, if you like) to communicate meaning. So, it would follow to infer from this that she wishes to be a "better" journalist. Better is of course the comparative which rightly rests upon the present and the future and, one present and future which is predetermined by her job. A "hope" that could, also, be further refined.
4. It would follow, of course, to say that she wishes to be more intelligent. This can be founded on cultural, social, and again, contextual determiners. So, she hopes to communicate meaning through journalism. Well, how?
By being pretty?--or,
by sharing news through language?
What if this were a radio channel and she started moaning every tenth word? People would just say, Gosh...I like this news much better than all the other news stations?
5. Unfortunately, many people WOULD! &, for countless & [mostly] 1 simple reason. SEXual appeal! Not JUST current events.
So, what r her aspirations? Well, this is obviously a naive qstion if we wish to comprehensively label each or even strain hope as though it could b a countable product of some sort. There are immediate &distant, superficial &profound, illusive &misunderstood hopes which could just as easily be named dreams, wishes, wants, passions, envisagings; &, these in all of us.
1. To summarize for you, buddy, Ill just say.. the problem is like what I said with contemporary, occidental cinema. Acting should be about acting, not beauty or sexual appeal. can you imagine only loving art if it were filled with beautiful women? The news should be about news, not about some pretty presenter who is there BECAUSE of sexual appeal. Think about Vanna White. You dont think she actually had credentials, do you? She was just pretty. That is why she was there. Its like a president.
2. One should be there for the right reasons, not because they were born into millions upon millions of dollars and can manufacture people's conscent with their network of enticers.
So, here I was making that suggestion. I was saying, you do not need to present yourself, but: THE NEWS.
3. However, this was not all I said. I also complimented her on the improvements she has been making. She has improved her posture, and her conversational psychology has also gotten better. These are genuine compliments, regardless of how specific or non-conventional they may seem to the superficial or thoughtless spectator.
Listen, if u'd like 2argue, then bring up some real points. These intimations of rhetoric but aggravate insight. In the world of language, news is collected all the time; from popular literature, to television, to internet, to folklore, to basic sense inference. My getting news from one medium but not another is not a question. The question was, WHY has the host & director of such reports only appeared in short sleeve shirts & open tops if she has in us a confidence of maturity & receptivity?
that is a legitimate point. for some reason someone like you is watching this video regardless of what they think of the presentation. Is it because the news here is so much better than anywhere else? what is it about this channel and it's presentation that has you watching it on a regular enough basis to notice changes in the host? don't read sarcasm where there isn't any...
Oh, no...its just that they asked me if I wanted to be their friend here on youtube so, after I had accepted, I could see when they posted new videos. Anyways, I imagine its not as easy as it may seem to direct or even present information as they do. If you get friends on youtube, you can usually c their activity &, the videos they watch r sometimes interesting. So, that's why. If you want to strengthen your arguments, study Logic & continue writing. take care
2. After that it seemed like some national hate group, you know? Good job on the video! I liked it. And, I do not at all mean to be offensive but change shirts. Better posture. Thanks for saying what you did! Good job! (im not an asshole)
Some critiquing. It was a super good idea to throw in some profanity in there & take advantage of your youtube position. (Ill admit that I am only sharing my opinion, obviously no technical experience) However, it seemed a bit much after the second & third time. You might in the future just those expressions once or perhaps twice. The first one with the beep was great!
Obama is completely incompetent.
RadarGuidedVermin 4 months ago
"God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve! Well, he made Adam and Eve AND Adam and Steve AND Madam and Eve; God made Adam and Eve! Not Abdulla and Stefani! Death to all Muslims!; God made Adam and Eve, not abortion, so say no to abortion"
Oh, I just love the "God made" arguments, because they're used people people with brains of CRAP.
enzedbrit 6 months ago
Jesus is coming? Why? What difference will that make? Will he bring stuff, or come empty handed? Will he expect lodging? How will that actually work?
Sorry, but this idea is just another bizarre angle of Christian fundamentalism that makes no sense. It wasn't until 300 years after the crucifixion that Scriptures included any mention about a resurrection. For 300 years no mention of it! Why is that?
Jesus is either late, or he can't make it. There's no one coming. Face it and move on.
Chelsea4President 7 months ago
Two years later Obama hasn't done anything about gay marriage and won't do anything about it. He's against gay marriage too.
PissedFechtmeister 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I big fuck you to all homo haters.
luvbites23 1 year ago
God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve but then Eve had a sex change and became Steve.
BALKANBUDHA 1 year ago
No offence to any Obama voter.....but, His middle name is hussein, dude.
Can we really trust this "African American"?
oneofanceantproficy 2 years ago
@oneofanceantproficy it really has nothing to do with his skin color, it has to do with his character...and he has failed that test.
jokat9193 1 year ago
@oneofanceantproficy Hussein means handsome in Arabic.
So please, use it more. You're complimenting Obama every time you say it.
bagelsandstuff 1 year ago
In their enthusiatic banning of gay marriage in Texas, they accidently banned ALL marriage. Yes, really.... see The Young Turks for info.
vikkipollard5 2 years ago
With a marriage license you sign yourself
over to the gov. including your kids. You do not need a permit to love someone. God is pure love, keep up his power. LOVE anyone & everyone. Love does not
need permission, its freedom, the only
one you really have & its your power, use
it freely to the max.
mamacordella 2 years ago
fuck obama and all corrupt hacks. Just because a person does not like homosexuality does not make that person homophobes. I am a conservative lesbian and I hate what malicious gays are doing by harassing church members and throwing condoms on church floors. People don't have to accept the fact I am gay. I don't expect them to change their opinion about the issue. This country has bigger issues than gay issues, like national security. Keeping jobs. Our prez and congress are destroying both.
denalaurens 2 years ago
lets all kiss that big black presidents ass
mstaff657 2 years ago
1:48
Yes, gays are less than straights. That is why they are gay. So that the likelyhood of them reproducing is much lower.
CarlLewenski 2 years ago
ATHEISTS AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE
legacy6684 2 years ago
Fuck I hate living in Florida. That dumb-fuck amendment 2 doesn't just keep Gays from joining in Civil Unions but straight people to. But the fucking churches saw their chance and pretty much, had being gay in Florida, banned.
Thedayrecker 2 years ago
Then get out of Florida, move back up north where you came from.
FacetiousJosh 2 years ago
.....Which is strange because I was born in Miami..... in fact nowhere did I say i was from anywhere BUT Florida..... dumbass
Thedayrecker 2 years ago
That's why it's called an assumption cock face, nobody trashes their own hood... well almost nobody... but really, get out of Florida, if you don't like it here, we don't need you here.
FacetiousJosh 2 years ago
Ahh yes my hood..... well I didn't realise I was argueing with a 10 year old. Well mr doodyhead you smell like butt
Thedayrecker 2 years ago
if you weren't half retarded, you would realize that hood is an abbreviated form of neighborhood. I didn't think I would have to spell that out for you, sorry. As for the butt smell, that's from the shit staining your face after all the salads you've tossed.
FacetiousJosh 2 years ago
See, even the uneducated hood rats know being Gay is nothing we should ever celebrate.
pimpdalyrical 2 years ago
if people want to be gay leave them to it as for obama he is a fake have a look at the obama deception
greenmandidg 2 years ago
Heyz! Iz you'z a lez mrz. ladiez? I'mz iz very edumacated n luv you'z biased reports (does that 's' belong 'reports'?)! I'mz believez in Godz and I believe in Ba'rock! ...I hope...
Obamaluvsyou 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. copy and paste to 8 other videos
2.look at your profile backround
sorry i just wanna try this
ytfGVBSDYUIFV 2 years ago
Why are people who disagree with gay marriage called homophobes? I do not fear gays; I simply disagree with them about marriage. What's next abortionphobes?
tom87pate 2 years ago 2
Gay people are free to marry any person of the opposite sex they want. Just like everyone else
skrap31 2 years ago 4
LOL, that made me laugh :P
Battlestarter 2 years ago
SHOULD be free to marry. They cant do it legally yet which sucks big time and is a ridiculous law. I agree marriage is a long-term commitment entered into by two people in love. Notice how i specify PEOPLE rather man and woman.
Other then that I totally agree with your post.
NickyLess 2 years ago
@skrap31 And disabled people are free to use stairs and non-reserved parking, just like everyone else.
enzedbrit 6 months ago
God damn it Florida! You got us stuck with Bush for a second time and now this!
RevolutionaryMartyr9 2 years ago 2
why do gays need to get married? ive heard enough of how they cant get married, but why do they need it?
ushouldpanic 2 years ago
Why does a man and a woman need it? I mean really, why do they -need- it?
Fixxx83 2 years ago 4
why do men and women need to get married?
RevolutionaryMartyr9 2 years ago
so when the woman try's to leave the man she can take half of everything he has, which sucks
Battlestarter 2 years ago
we elected a bunch of crooks from chicago, that is all that was done. now we get to see how the crooks work there magic, get your gun and beans ready.
pigface72 2 years ago
i love you MOBLOGICTV....thanks for what you do and being real
sheldy29 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God this liberal whore needs to get morales
JeffreyEdward19 3 years ago
You have information that she accepts money for sex? I think not. Just 'cos a woman holds views which you do not warrant calling her a whore. And what's so 'whore-like' about being a Liberal? The tides has turned on the Neo Conservative project. It ended with the Credit Crunch.
SteffanLlwyd 3 years ago
actually i think you do. but you could kindly explain what the hell you're talking about.
webmaster2089 3 years ago
We are all gonna be judged! Some conservatives might go to hell don't be suprised gays might get into heaven before some one else you expect
G7X3 3 years ago
Apparently YOU do. Throwing out names like whore is not what I call "having morals". Btw learn to spell.
RevolutionaryMartyr9 2 years ago
I'm concerned about freedom of speech. A judges vote meant the re-definition of marriage, so just because he's a judge he's right and every religious person before him was wrong...
They're going to tell us what to believe and make it against the law to speak out about our sincerely held religious beliefs - it's not against scripture to be black, the 'same as race' argument is wrong
You can love anyone you want, you really can, don't ask for my seal of approval
vwcops 3 years ago
Your freedom of speech was never in jeopardy.
Marriage has been redefined many times. Slaves couldn't legally marry. Fifty years ago many states said blacks couldn't marry whites. Those aren't the only ways marriage has changed.
It used to be against scripture to be black. Both the Old and New Testaments condone slavery. Noah's cursed son was used to justify enslaving blacks. For the Mormons, being black was a mark of Laman's curse... at least until VERY recently.
Do unto others, vwcops.
peirigill 3 years ago
In canada right now, religious groups have to have their messages edited to make sure nobody says anything to bother homosexuals and muslims, by government mandate. It isn't freedom of speech without being able to voice a real opinion
This is about states rights (keeping the federal government constitutionally limited), freedom of speech, and for the other side- respect. They are free to love who they want, and they demand approval.
you're ignorant about scripture and mormonism is a cult
vwcops 3 years ago
Canada doesn't have our First Amendment or our traditions of jurisprudence. It's not illegal to speak out if you sincerely believe interracial marriage is un-Christian. Of course, people will rightly think you're a bigot.
You talk about respect and then bear false witness against me by saying I'm ignorant about Scripture. I've read the Bible and taken both Christian and Jewish courses on it.
Whether Mormonism is a cult or not, they were a major player in passing Prop 8. They're on your side.
peirigill 3 years ago
NO ONE is asking for your personal seal of approval as far as your religious beliefs go. No one is asking for the religioug seal of approval. They are asking for a LEGAL seal of approval. Seperation of church and state dumbass.
Sassychic76 3 years ago 2
So what's wrong with creating the community the majority of voters in those states obviously want? I personally don't have an issue with gays marrying or recogizing it as such. I do, however, have a big f'ing problem with people thinking every state should be the same. People don't hold the same values everywhere, get over it. If you want gay marriage recognized by the courts, etc., you have Connecticut to live in or any of the other states that don't seem to think it's an issue.
has25252 3 years ago
Fuck the Gays!
There, that proves I'm not homophobic.
Odziz 3 years ago
1. Justifying irresponsibility with the "Pro Choice" flag is ultimately detrimental to our society and completely immoral in all aspects of the word.
2. Let them have unions or partnerships or whatever certified...but don't you think changing the literal definition of words so as to not "hurt their feelings" or "make them feel included" is sort of stupid? Get over it. You lost in CA. Ain't democracy a bitch? Notice that if it would have been in favor they'd criticize others for protests
smttysmth02gt 3 years ago
i voted NO on 8 !!!! cuz i dont care what gay ppl do!!! if getting married is what they want !! well let them have that!!! we should all be treated equal!!!
hectorste1 3 years ago
SOMEONE has to be an oppressed minority.
Way to use that execution vid I sent you but won't take credit for you seeing.
Huzzah for the right to an abortion.
Now, about that Crest commercial....
DANE842 3 years ago
Way to go FLORIDA! F***in` shit up again! ~~ S
srsarts 3 years ago
'separate but equal' isn't.
memberbs 3 years ago
I disagree, but very funny stuff.
motlay 3 years ago
Great video. Good points. You made it fresh and interesting so that even though I already agree with you I enjoyed hearing your point-of-view. Some of the comments here are weird and creepy lol.
UnionStayshyn 3 years ago
If you understand anything about inalienable rights, you know that it is impossible for the public to make ANY marriage illegal.
newgtguy 3 years ago
Unfortunately, I don't think this will be one of Obama's priorities. He may keep it status quo by passing the issue onto individual states.
infinidem 3 years ago
I'm dismayed at both the gay marriage ban and the abortion initiatives. The rights of the unborn and gay people have been taken away.
blink56k 3 years ago
1. Sad! Apparently, the foundation of psychiatry removed homosexuality from its lists of mental problems in only the 60s &, [it is] only recently that the U.S. has seen its first colored president! Racism nearly certifies that he be at least a B president. Also noteworthy of mention: in the US many states will put s.o. to death even if found legally insane. In many other countries, they dont even have a death penalty!
semasiologistics 3 years ago
2. How time shall stigmatize that maggot-fat centipede called Religion. Woe be to the damage & disgrace & wholly diminished disgust it has done! WOE!
semasiologistics 3 years ago
(gosh, my comment sounded really mean! But, who better 2come from than some complete stranger who u can either 1, brush off as a completely inconsiderate fool/freak or, two, b mad at but take into account. I guess ther r other options but, hopefully u'll c that Im only trying to make a suggestion. N most of your videos you wear sleeveless tops that r open on the top. U are very pretty, of course... & ur fashion choices r none of my business. I just mean... it doesnt seem best, maybe. I dunno.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
why?
DANE842 3 years ago
1. You mean why not?
Because it unnaturally caters to the idea that first, wearing such clothes is 'good'. If not, second, that we actually prefer such attire. Third, consider that these videos are made by several people; they are reviewed and like most broadcasts: recited, practiced & scrutinized. Her shirts are not an accident. They are chosen that way for many reasons.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
2. However, as others may not have noticed or thought about it, I in fact have seen that she has been making an effort at improving not just her delivery but also her posture and more subtly; her conversational psychology. So, if she wants to be a news reporter--well, most news stations have another protocol than that. Generally they dress more 'business' versus more 'cute girl tops'.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
3. I do not expect you to believe the objective modifications I myself have identified; mostly I think people just come to listen to their stuff. I, on the other hand, have noticed things like her always wearing sleeveless shirts. Should not the question be, WHY does she always wear sleeveless shirts?--I think that was the question you didn't ask. :)
semasiologistics 3 years ago
1. Sex sells and I don't mind the tactic. I'm not blinded by a cute girl and I don't feel like I need to defend those who are.
2. What ARE her aspirations? Do you know?
DANE842 3 years ago
1. The last thing I want to be looking at is some woman's breasts or some ideal visage because the broadcasting agency thinks me unable to attend the NEWS they deliver unless by such means. With that, I am basically against that sexual trait of cinema called HOLLYWOOD!. Take... Angelina Jolie. Let's say she is some great actress and we just LOVE her--yeah!.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
2. Why isn't it just that she is really pretty and everyone likes to watch really pretty people? Acting and sexual appeal are certainly different subjects in my book. Yet, in American & British cinema, the later has for some time been taking over the former.
Now, of course we can see cultural aspirations in countless folk, we can see identity aims, and of course contextual desires.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
3. I speak of the later when I mention her wanting to be a journalist or the like. She is a journalist now. Of course, this means she strives (or hopes, if you like) to communicate meaning. So, it would follow to infer from this that she wishes to be a "better" journalist. Better is of course the comparative which rightly rests upon the present and the future and, one present and future which is predetermined by her job. A "hope" that could, also, be further refined.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
4. It would follow, of course, to say that she wishes to be more intelligent. This can be founded on cultural, social, and again, contextual determiners. So, she hopes to communicate meaning through journalism. Well, how?
By being pretty?--or,
by sharing news through language?
What if this were a radio channel and she started moaning every tenth word? People would just say, Gosh...I like this news much better than all the other news stations?
semasiologistics 3 years ago
5. Unfortunately, many people WOULD! &, for countless & [mostly] 1 simple reason. SEXual appeal! Not JUST current events.
So, what r her aspirations? Well, this is obviously a naive qstion if we wish to comprehensively label each or even strain hope as though it could b a countable product of some sort. There are immediate &distant, superficial &profound, illusive &misunderstood hopes which could just as easily be named dreams, wishes, wants, passions, envisagings; &, these in all of us.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
6. (P.S. I do not mean to suggest that she is exploiting her physical self in the making of any of their videos! I do not think she is at all.)
semasiologistics 3 years ago
1. To summarize for you, buddy, Ill just say.. the problem is like what I said with contemporary, occidental cinema. Acting should be about acting, not beauty or sexual appeal. can you imagine only loving art if it were filled with beautiful women? The news should be about news, not about some pretty presenter who is there BECAUSE of sexual appeal. Think about Vanna White. You dont think she actually had credentials, do you? She was just pretty. That is why she was there. Its like a president.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
2. One should be there for the right reasons, not because they were born into millions upon millions of dollars and can manufacture people's conscent with their network of enticers.
So, here I was making that suggestion. I was saying, you do not need to present yourself, but: THE NEWS.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
3. However, this was not all I said. I also complimented her on the improvements she has been making. She has improved her posture, and her conversational psychology has also gotten better. These are genuine compliments, regardless of how specific or non-conventional they may seem to the superficial or thoughtless spectator.
semasiologistics 3 years ago
You're clearly a literate person, but you're getting your news from a video, why is that?
DANE842 3 years ago
Listen, if u'd like 2argue, then bring up some real points. These intimations of rhetoric but aggravate insight. In the world of language, news is collected all the time; from popular literature, to television, to internet, to folklore, to basic sense inference. My getting news from one medium but not another is not a question. The question was, WHY has the host & director of such reports only appeared in short sleeve shirts & open tops if she has in us a confidence of maturity & receptivity?
semasiologistics 3 years ago
that is a legitimate point. for some reason someone like you is watching this video regardless of what they think of the presentation. Is it because the news here is so much better than anywhere else? what is it about this channel and it's presentation that has you watching it on a regular enough basis to notice changes in the host? don't read sarcasm where there isn't any...
DANE842 3 years ago
Oh, no...its just that they asked me if I wanted to be their friend here on youtube so, after I had accepted, I could see when they posted new videos. Anyways, I imagine its not as easy as it may seem to direct or even present information as they do. If you get friends on youtube, you can usually c their activity &, the videos they watch r sometimes interesting. So, that's why. If you want to strengthen your arguments, study Logic & continue writing. take care
semasiologistics 3 years ago
2. After that it seemed like some national hate group, you know? Good job on the video! I liked it. And, I do not at all mean to be offensive but change shirts. Better posture. Thanks for saying what you did! Good job! (im not an asshole)
semasiologistics 3 years ago
1. Funny, this one! (FIRST COMMENT EVER!, YEAH!)
Some critiquing. It was a super good idea to throw in some profanity in there & take advantage of your youtube position. (Ill admit that I am only sharing my opinion, obviously no technical experience) However, it seemed a bit much after the second & third time. You might in the future just those expressions once or perhaps twice. The first one with the beep was great!
semasiologistics 3 years ago