Of course it's easier- basic physics! The area in which you can have points of balance is much "larger" than when the pirouette is done on high relevé. You can even switch between multiple balance points within one pirouette, or much more points than a normal gymnast would do, hence you can permit yourself to turn much more than others. It's totally unfair that some gymnasts were allowed to do such pirouettes and others would get deductions for similar "technique". It's simply appalling!!
@huskytail: it IS appalling if different gymnasts are treated differently, of course. But I don't agree that it can be regarded as an "easier" way to rotate.
When I was in RG, for instance, I found it easier to do all the balances and pirouttes on FULL releve (it felt more stable to me) and I found a certain point, where I could balance for a long time. But some find their "center" in an incomplete releve. but as long as they execute the element in a clean way, I believe it should be counted.
If you don't believe me, then consider thiese 2 problems. 1. The others couldn't because the low relevé was a fault in execution (the element being generally counted). 2. No other Russians found their "personal" point in turning like this. Isn't it strange? For the hundreds of gymnasts Russia produced, only NOW, suddenly, a whole generation is founding its touring point on low relevé. It's a LEARNED technique because it allows you to turn more, especially in arabesque pivots.
@huskytail btw, the area doesn't necessarily become larger, the difference is the height your heel is on (measured from the floor), but you still rotate on your toes and the adjacent part of your foot sort of ;) try it on the floor, and you ll notice, that the area actually stays the same ;)
I should write an essay in order to explain how balance works and the transition from static position to moving pos. If you find the balance on a high relevé- the result is perfect. The point here is that it's much more difficult, much more work to do so. You need a very good muscle and position preparation. While when you are on a low relevé, you don't. There is a reason the low rel. was deduced as a fault. I assure you, I've done enough years of gymnastics and classical ballet.
Wow cuanto ha crecido y cuando desarrolado luce su cuerpo ahora en comparacion del año pasado,en verdad que es realmente buena,fantastica lukonina?Kondakova? naaa veo ma sprobable que esta nena le acompañe a Londres 2012 es mejor que las ya mencionadas !!!
what is this music?
maeelha 1 year ago
I loveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
yannberthou 2 years ago
I hate hate hate her and Kondakova's pivots.
yago311 2 years ago
if you don't like their pivots, why do you continue to look at their videos???!!!???
r92sss 2 years ago
@yago311 they are both amazing! Watch this space, one day this girl will be world champion
nicw 2 years ago
NOOOOOOOO !!! :@
yannberthou 2 years ago
@yago311 Why do you hate their pivots?
HailieNichole1995 1 year ago
kind of remind me something of the graceful that kabaeva used to have....
anabolenapitin 2 years ago 4
She does not turn in complete releve, why???
81lavy 2 years ago
Must be easy to do pivots without complete releve...I read that isn´t punished to do pivots like that....some people like it...other not
268482 2 years ago
it's not "easier", it's rather a matter of personal technique and finding one's point of balance..
outthehead 2 years ago
Of course it's easier- basic physics! The area in which you can have points of balance is much "larger" than when the pirouette is done on high relevé. You can even switch between multiple balance points within one pirouette, or much more points than a normal gymnast would do, hence you can permit yourself to turn much more than others. It's totally unfair that some gymnasts were allowed to do such pirouettes and others would get deductions for similar "technique". It's simply appalling!!
huskytail 2 years ago
@huskytail: it IS appalling if different gymnasts are treated differently, of course. But I don't agree that it can be regarded as an "easier" way to rotate.
When I was in RG, for instance, I found it easier to do all the balances and pirouttes on FULL releve (it felt more stable to me) and I found a certain point, where I could balance for a long time. But some find their "center" in an incomplete releve. but as long as they execute the element in a clean way, I believe it should be counted.
outthehead 2 years ago
If you don't believe me, then consider thiese 2 problems. 1. The others couldn't because the low relevé was a fault in execution (the element being generally counted). 2. No other Russians found their "personal" point in turning like this. Isn't it strange? For the hundreds of gymnasts Russia produced, only NOW, suddenly, a whole generation is founding its touring point on low relevé. It's a LEARNED technique because it allows you to turn more, especially in arabesque pivots.
huskytail 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
outthehead 2 years ago
@huskytail btw, the area doesn't necessarily become larger, the difference is the height your heel is on (measured from the floor), but you still rotate on your toes and the adjacent part of your foot sort of ;) try it on the floor, and you ll notice, that the area actually stays the same ;)
outthehead 2 years ago
I should write an essay in order to explain how balance works and the transition from static position to moving pos. If you find the balance on a high relevé- the result is perfect. The point here is that it's much more difficult, much more work to do so. You need a very good muscle and position preparation. While when you are on a low relevé, you don't. There is a reason the low rel. was deduced as a fault. I assure you, I've done enough years of gymnastics and classical ballet.
huskytail 2 years ago
Amazing! <3 What's the name song please!???
She's incredible! =D oO" Love it!
GrSfan 2 years ago
Wow cuanto ha crecido y cuando desarrolado luce su cuerpo ahora en comparacion del año pasado,en verdad que es realmente buena,fantastica lukonina?Kondakova? naaa veo ma sprobable que esta nena le acompañe a Londres 2012 es mejor que las ya mencionadas !!!
Orozcomen 2 years ago 6
she is so much better than ermakova, she should be in the world championships instead ermakova
kindheittraumer 2 years ago 9
she will perform ball actually ;D
268482 2 years ago
ermakova or dmitrievA?
kindheittraumer 2 years ago
dmitrieva...ermakova was replaced! i don´t know why...
268482 2 years ago
Is this the same leotard of Kanaeva with clubs in the European Championchips of 2008?
carles69p 2 years ago 3
yes, it is.
268482 2 years ago