If some of you bastards new anything about ww2s guns, they aren't as accurate as modern day guns. Thats one of the many reasons why DoD 1.3 beats Source.
@kingplutoxiao1 If you knew anything about guns you would know when up close and when you take your time to aim like what he did is completely accurate, if you think it's as inaccurate as a 1800's musket then go ahead think that.
Oh whats even better is when you hit someone in the very top of their helmet and it does no damage but yet shows the blood and everything. Its like "WTF OMGZORS HAX" Lol.
I dont know where the sense is of directly comparing a game that is almost 10 years old to some rather new game DoDS is now not new anymore, but there is still a time difference between HL2s engine and DoD 1.3 for its time DoD 1.3 was awesome. People knew about the issues with the hitboxes not beeing 100% acurate but for THEIR time they did a much better job then DoDs ever did. Its interesting that you test the British in DoD 1.3 while there are no one of them present in DoDs for example
too bad that i got baned on most of good dod 1.3 servers because of blocking, racism and excessive teamkilling...i really enjoyed teamkillin these clan tag noobs in old dod...well, guess these ass-mins should have emptied their ban lists, if they still wanted people playing on their abadoned dod 1.3 servers :D
1.3 is best and btw its the 1.3 models that doesnt fit the hitbox retard. U can download fps models that is like [] boxes. Source is shit when it comes to "move and shoot" cos the game cant handle shiet. Source was built for singel player.
DOD:S vs 1.3 - CS 1.6 vs CS:S, the Source versions of these games are different from their originals. In my opinion, 1.3 was WAY better then Source - in my opinion, because of the community, the maps, the gameplay... I remember fighting through a field that had shallow trenches and mortar holes while sniper and mg fire ripped up the ground, vs storming a small beach where its easy and takes very little to get to the bunkers and capture them... the games are completely different. I prefer DOD 1.3
Rofl at all the poor cheapfucks saying source is ugly.
Open your fucking eyes and look at 1.3. If source doesnt look better to you, then you're a earfucked aids carrier, period. Dod 1.3 WAS shitter, Valve was not experienced then and you know, newer version of games TEND to be better, idiots. Stop defending some shit and saying stuff that isnt true.
I was a fan of 1.3 but moved to source myself, Idk how can you like that dull, and boring style anymore. Only thing I miss is weapons. Rest is gay
@Karmelloo youre right but i think the only reason why DoD source is better is because when people die they fall down like ragdolls unlike old valve games but i think both of DoDs are fun
The problem is that there's no accuracy in dod:s so when ur shooting a bar from 20m the gun just sprays, no matter where u put the aimer its a cone so people rage that there's no detection its just that all the guns shoot in a random cone.
I remember the original as being way funner than the Source version. For instance, what ever happened to the Brits? All of the other weapon classes? The Falschirmjager, and American paratrooper levels like dod_glider? I guess we'll have to wait until they make another one, maybe they'll include the Russians, Japanese, or Italians, or probably not.
I defenetly agree!! Day of Defeat Source is crap! All player classes look the same! Pick a rifleman. Usual face. Pick another class, precisly same face!
this actually is the only serious problem in dod 1.3, apart from that i prefer it for everything else than source. source is crap, player models are ugly, their animations too, creeping there is soo unrealistic fast, pov weapon are weird, your hands are big and fat compared to weapons, who looks like toys...
I Play 1.3 , i miss source soo much , They're Equally fun but I hate the Hit Detection in 1.3. Such crap. plus i'm kinda of a Realism nut. i like it to be fun. but real at the same time ya know? Source did it for me. but my Computer keeps crashing about 20-30 minutes into it. weird cuz i used to play it for Hours on end sometimes days. so thats why i switched.
i used to have the crappiest computer ever and i told myself that when i get a new gaming rig im going to buy dod source and never play games with bad graphics. lol 1 year later and i have that new gaming rig and i still choose to play dod 1.3 over dod source
dod 1.3 will always be my fav, but after playing source for the past maybe 4 months religously i kind of grew found for it. Now im in a dilemma cause i still go on 1.3 but i feel like i suck again and i have learn it all over
Why in DoD source did they make a melee attack for SMG class and take out the melee for rifle class, I mean, it's not like the SMG player would need to use melee when the rifle men clearly would of needed melee at close up.
@Spaminator2000 , yeah i wondered that too , i also wish they kept the all the old weapon classess and kept the M1Garand and the K98 Equal , they probly thought that because the M1 is Semi Auto it would be cheap. but it's still a slow shooter and the Axis K98 has a Huge Advantage over it. very Frustrating
Yeah the M1 in dods is just completely gutta trash. Plus the recoil and accuracy in that game is such a ridiculous mess. Fun fact, the dev team quit before finishing the kinks on dods
Thats fine and dandy, but that doesn't compensate the fact that DoD:S still sucks. I've played 1.3 for years and never had a problem with the hitbox's, personally i thought they were very forgiving.
why u kill friendlys and the friendlys are americans?
best weapons??maybe
LazyTroll100 1 month ago
who cares about hit detection,that guy is a team killer!
comicallu35 3 months ago
no pedobear is correct, he stinks at dods though
snarfbot 5 months ago
If some of you bastards new anything about ww2s guns, they aren't as accurate as modern day guns. Thats one of the many reasons why DoD 1.3 beats Source.
kingplutoxiao1 10 months ago
@kingplutoxiao1 If you knew anything about guns you would know when up close and when you take your time to aim like what he did is completely accurate, if you think it's as inaccurate as a 1800's musket then go ahead think that.
MrLegendarypedobear 5 months ago
@MrLegendarypedobear No, that only applies for the first shot.
kingplutoxiao1 5 months ago
if i was that guy i wouldn't want him shooting through my legs so close to my groin like that
sniperdog125 11 months ago
why so many cheaters are from poland?
StrictlyBG 1 year ago
@StrictlyBG they need it to be able to reach to our skill level :D
mtothem1337 1 year ago
DOD 1.3 > DOD:S
archas49 1 year ago 4
Oh whats even better is when you hit someone in the very top of their helmet and it does no damage but yet shows the blood and everything. Its like "WTF OMGZORS HAX" Lol.
BackDoorGaming 1 year ago
I dont know where the sense is of directly comparing a game that is almost 10 years old to some rather new game DoDS is now not new anymore, but there is still a time difference between HL2s engine and DoD 1.3 for its time DoD 1.3 was awesome. People knew about the issues with the hitboxes not beeing 100% acurate but for THEIR time they did a much better job then DoDs ever did. Its interesting that you test the British in DoD 1.3 while there are no one of them present in DoDs for example
CrniWuk 1 year ago
1.3 is still better but has poor hitboxes, only problem
ShazeTheHedgehog 1 year ago
too bad that i got baned on most of good dod 1.3 servers because of blocking, racism and excessive teamkilling...i really enjoyed teamkillin these clan tag noobs in old dod...well, guess these ass-mins should have emptied their ban lists, if they still wanted people playing on their abadoned dod 1.3 servers :D
Schlittenfahrer93 1 year ago
1.3 is best and btw its the 1.3 models that doesnt fit the hitbox retard. U can download fps models that is like [] boxes. Source is shit when it comes to "move and shoot" cos the game cant handle shiet. Source was built for singel player.
nightcrow90 1 year ago
dods is better than 1.3
Sotasukka 1 year ago
I got DoDS for 2 bucks. Never played DoD 1.3, don't care.
10samm10 1 year ago
1.3 > dods
trick32190 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
were do you get dod:s bots ?
felipemurua 1 year ago
were do you get dod:s bots ?
felipemurua 1 year ago
were you get dod:s bots ?
felipemurua 1 year ago
Better hit detection, better graphics.. more servers... AND YET IT STILL BLOWS!
lexmark136 1 year ago 5
@lexmark136 more servers cuz nobody plays those old games anymore :O..
Guckensens 1 year ago
source is gay & for noobs
timetogetwicked 1 year ago
DOD:S vs 1.3 - CS 1.6 vs CS:S, the Source versions of these games are different from their originals. In my opinion, 1.3 was WAY better then Source - in my opinion, because of the community, the maps, the gameplay... I remember fighting through a field that had shallow trenches and mortar holes while sniper and mg fire ripped up the ground, vs storming a small beach where its easy and takes very little to get to the bunkers and capture them... the games are completely different. I prefer DOD 1.3
Indistinctable 1 year ago
nice game
tefatr 1 year ago
Rofl at all the poor cheapfucks saying source is ugly.
Open your fucking eyes and look at 1.3. If source doesnt look better to you, then you're a earfucked aids carrier, period. Dod 1.3 WAS shitter, Valve was not experienced then and you know, newer version of games TEND to be better, idiots. Stop defending some shit and saying stuff that isnt true.
I was a fan of 1.3 but moved to source myself, Idk how can you like that dull, and boring style anymore. Only thing I miss is weapons. Rest is gay
Karmelloo 1 year ago
@Karmelloo youre right but i think the only reason why DoD source is better is because when people die they fall down like ragdolls unlike old valve games but i think both of DoDs are fun
sonicfan910 1 year ago
@sonicfan910 Who wants a game that they All die the in the same way, thats why there is ragdolls. so every death is different
KozMick1 1 year ago
Tis doesn't prove a dam thing, again when their moving targets, Source totaly fails where 1.3 does not, 1.3 still has a superior community as well
DoDPUB 1 year ago
The problem is that there's no accuracy in dod:s so when ur shooting a bar from 20m the gun just sprays, no matter where u put the aimer its a cone so people rage that there's no detection its just that all the guns shoot in a random cone.
musevash 1 year ago
I remember the original as being way funner than the Source version. For instance, what ever happened to the Brits? All of the other weapon classes? The Falschirmjager, and American paratrooper levels like dod_glider? I guess we'll have to wait until they make another one, maybe they'll include the Russians, Japanese, or Italians, or probably not.
DontBeAfraidToCare 1 year ago 3
Wait! No! This is all wrong!!
You playing on the resulution 600 something x something more. But if you play on the highest qualaty this wont happend.
AAAZ2A 1 year ago
lol thanks for sharing
l3eeron 1 year ago
Dod 1.3 is better imo. If u want realism, then go play arma 2
Flaeshbjoerne 1 year ago
n1kmz
I defenetly agree!! Day of Defeat Source is crap! All player classes look the same! Pick a rifleman. Usual face. Pick another class, precisly same face!
And the weapons look wierd
AAAZ2A 1 year ago
this actually is the only serious problem in dod 1.3, apart from that i prefer it for everything else than source. source is crap, player models are ugly, their animations too, creeping there is soo unrealistic fast, pov weapon are weird, your hands are big and fat compared to weapons, who looks like toys...
n1kmz 1 year ago
@n1kmz I agree!! I agree so much!!
AAAZ2A 1 year ago
Source is for noobs :( 3.1b pwns too. dods isn't dod enymore...
kayttoaika 1 year ago
Coz u cant aim (right click) In DoD 1.3
BobbeTobbe 2 years ago
cool video
Philmen 2 years ago
The older one is for sure hard, but even I think the Source version is hard because I fail so hard at it. Keep getting shot when I don't see them.
nlicky 2 years ago
I Play 1.3 , i miss source soo much , They're Equally fun but I hate the Hit Detection in 1.3. Such crap. plus i'm kinda of a Realism nut. i like it to be fun. but real at the same time ya know? Source did it for me. but my Computer keeps crashing about 20-30 minutes into it. weird cuz i used to play it for Hours on end sometimes days. so thats why i switched.
Ghostofgrace92 2 years ago
lol the headshot at the end!
musto94 2 years ago
I tried them 1.3 and source i like source more cuz it got better quality
BlueSpy545 2 years ago
i used to have the crappiest computer ever and i told myself that when i get a new gaming rig im going to buy dod source and never play games with bad graphics. lol 1 year later and i have that new gaming rig and i still choose to play dod 1.3 over dod source
tripplenipple100 2 years ago 2
dod 1.3 will always be my fav, but after playing source for the past maybe 4 months religously i kind of grew found for it. Now im in a dilemma cause i still go on 1.3 but i feel like i suck again and i have learn it all over
nore133231 2 years ago
yes source games are more about equality and limitations than the ability and ownage you can see on older game engines
BlackOps78321 2 years ago
aw man. i'm in the process of dling dod source because it's 3 bucks. i feel the same with cs 1.6 and cs source.
paulnguyen2689 2 years ago
Funny how so many players argue the opposite, that source games' hit detection is off and HL1 hit detection isn't.
lingojac 2 years ago
Original DoD Is still way more fun to play, fuck source
88Sublime96 2 years ago
Why in DoD source did they make a melee attack for SMG class and take out the melee for rifle class, I mean, it's not like the SMG player would need to use melee when the rifle men clearly would of needed melee at close up.
Spaminator2000 2 years ago
@Spaminator2000 , yeah i wondered that too , i also wish they kept the all the old weapon classess and kept the M1Garand and the K98 Equal , they probly thought that because the M1 is Semi Auto it would be cheap. but it's still a slow shooter and the Axis K98 has a Huge Advantage over it. very Frustrating
Ghostofgrace92 2 years ago
Yeah the M1 in dods is just completely gutta trash. Plus the recoil and accuracy in that game is such a ridiculous mess. Fun fact, the dev team quit before finishing the kinks on dods
icyrazor 2 years ago
Sucks there isnt any british in dods
Cla0016 2 years ago
yeah they should bring out an update with it
SuperEvilLemon 2 years ago
em.. .this is kinda dumb.. everyone knows that dod was made in around 2000..... so there is going to be things like that..
hehmeh 2 years ago
Dod 1.3 will always be the best version of DoD.
BiGAnZz 2 years ago 55
@BiGAnZz Yeah im still playing with my clan DOD 1.3 WOOT. I Wish i still owned source though. The game is dieing so fast it sucks...
raymanlegy 1 year ago
@BiGAnZz Nop
Valkmir 1 year ago
@BiGAnZz no way!!
loolser17 5 months ago
sooooo which one do you like better i think i like source i never got to play much 1.3 though
clayvision 2 years ago
I like 1.3 a lot, because it has more weapons than SOurce, and it works on crappy computers.
Voimamias 2 years ago 2
its not that good in dods i tryed it and sometime ahhh....^^
pommesmuskel 2 years ago
Thats fine and dandy, but that doesn't compensate the fact that DoD:S still sucks. I've played 1.3 for years and never had a problem with the hitbox's, personally i thought they were very forgiving.
DoDPUB 2 years ago
dont matter, dod source is still fuck.
IbanezRG123 3 years ago 2
yeah. dod source is licking new gen graphic's ass.
Miqimus 2 years ago
Alot of diehard DoD-fans I know don't like DoD Source but I like it.
Agentbromsnor 3 years ago
Still prefer the old hitboxes. ^.^;
Verd4 3 years ago 2
When they're moving though, in Source, that's when the hitboxes fail.
flea288 3 years ago 31
Not anymore.
QuantumCarl 3 years ago
@flea288
exactly. Same with CSS.
CrniWuk 1 year ago
Lol in DoD:S you got soo close to his crotch =p
Scarybunny88 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
GoldSrc?
That's the "internal" name for the Source engine.
It's what the Src stands for. SouRCe.
So technically they're the same engine, just re-defined.
QuantumCarl 3 years ago
completely different engines, Gold source is a modified quake 1 engine. source is valves own engine
doonbugie 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's the same engine, it's just been tinkered with. A lot. There's practically no original code.
QuantumCarl 3 years ago
In DODS you hardly ever aimed right.
CoolDog202 3 years ago
are you kidding me cooldog? how obvious is it that the hitboxes are the size of a monkeys nuts in dod 1.3 and in source they're perfect.
that doesn't make the DoD source cone of fire good tho
Ericthefilo 3 years ago 3
I never realized how bad it was, and yet everyone bitches about source's hitboxes.
kilorat 4 years ago
Ya because they don't know shit. Face it the old half life 1 engine is WAY to outdated.
gearsofmom 3 years ago
They bitch because the hitboxes lag behind the player when they're moving
RamboNorris 3 years ago
That depends on the server their connection!
gearsofmom 3 years ago
Holy Crap!
PlankofWood1 4 years ago