Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
I found this very interesting. Not because of the debate itself, but for the limitations it made apparent of the debate format. There was so much garbage thrown around on both sides, that the only option, given the time, was to use as many fallacies as possible to make your case. And when that happens, no one is swayed or informed. Thus making these debates a complete waste of everybodies time, creationists and evolutionists alike.
dutoilette 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GISH is a legend...We only see left handed amino acids when proteins are present..but proteins only form when u have LEFT HANDED AMINO ACIDS!!..Paradox....so how can life happen through a evolution process from simple chemicals and molecules, impossible.now science says crystals brought life here.thats not a testable science its a faith based assumption..all man can do is play with life and take pre existing information and rearranged it
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
I really dislike this debate.
technicallyabsurd 1 year ago
This debate was ugly as hell. Psuedo-scientific babble vs elitism and refusal to answer the question raised... This debate (which i watched all of) is a perfect example of what shouldn't take place. The format is horrible, and there is almost no discussion between the debaters. Its an argument of long orations, and was far too theatrical.
rocknrollerguy37 2 years ago 4
Yep, I'm with you there. Almost total bullshit from beginning to end. On both sides.
FreindlyRanger 2 years ago