Stanley Kubrick on the possibility of extra-terrestial life

[straker2]

@jhu776 Like most people, the only explanation I have for Stanley Kubrick is to assume he was a genius and leave it at that! :)

[peopledick]

An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).

I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.

My BLOG contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "SAM ZURICK" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!

[metalgta4xcon]

This man is nothing more then an evil aberration of what society has created its amazing how people love this man just because he made movie's with a talking red eye ball and a psychopath raping an elderly woman? Stanley Kubrick along with Frank Sinatra Jerry Lewis and all the other Mob enforced celebrity's should all fucking burn in hell!!

[dowdy17]

@metalgta4xcon I think people "love" him because he made some really amazing films. Some would say his films were an aberration of where society was headed, particularly 2001 and A Clockwork Orange, both of which it seems you have completely misinterpreted if you have actually watched them.

[DancingMad17]

pretentious art wank

[projektaurea]

sto milijardi! :D

Gilic rulz

[straker2]

There's some right old balls being talked in response to this video. The monolith is TV? Then how come Kubrick started off with a tetrahedron and only swapped to a monolith when he disovered the tetrahedron looked shit? How come he tried a transparent cube and only junked it because it reflected the studio lights? Kubrick was searching for what looked damn cool on a movie screen, not trying to make a statement about TV! 2001 has a theme, but it aint that whacko!

[longfootbuddy]

i dont really understand how you can come up with a likelyhood of life in the universe based on its size...if they found life elsewhere, then i could see them making likelyhood guesses, but until they find it elsewhere, they can only know that life is in one place...ufos are a good sign though, but theyre ufos, arent they

[ladil0lip0p]

@longfootbuddy life exists in ways to which humans are blind. on earth and elsewhere. bless you

[certifiedchillin420]

god i would've loved to talk to this man.

[mcamoran]

The funny thing is that 2001 was not a sci-fi film, it was about the media propaganda and how easily our perception could be controlled. Monolith=Television=Cinematic Screen.

[aaaaaaaaaajgvgjyc]

@mcamoran Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa? I suppose it could be seen as that but I've never heard that explanation before. It IS a sci-fi film, but its narrative is cryptic enough to be interpreted as nearly anything.

[mcamoran]

@aaaaaaaaaajgvgjyc It is not a sci-fi film, Heywood Floyd (defy holywood) wouldn't have gone to the monolith on the moon eating a sandwich. It was all a show, in the end Bowman realizes that he was an actor and was enlightened, the strange images he show, were his journey from 2 dimensional cinematic screen to the real world.

[aaaaaaaaaajgvgjyc]

@mcamoran Can I just advise you to not claim your personal interpretation of the film as an absolute? Thanks.

[mcamoran]

@aaaaaaaaaajgvgjyc This is the truth. As Kubrick stated, the truth is encoded in the pictures of the movie. Search deeper and you will understand, A.C.Clark wrote something totally different from what Kubrick directed. Monolith = Television = Media Propaganda = Altered Reality.

[aaaaaaaaaajgvgjyc]

@mcamoran Just let me stick with my interpretation and I'll let you stick with yours.

[abarrathemaster]

@aaaaaaaaaajgvgjyc maybe we the andinance are this thought up characters that only exist in Bowmen's mind. maybe that what Kubrick was trying to tell us mates

[ISuperLoveMovies]

Stanley Kubrick is so good it's scary!

[ChocolateSylvia]

Ok. The verdict is in. Stanley Kubrick was crazy. It's no wonder he was very rarely seen in public-he didn't want his insanity secret exposed....

[IncomingXOblivion]

Crazy because of his looks or because of how big the universe is? Must be the universe: we all know it's only a few light years big... nowhere near how big Kubrick said it was. ;)

Wasn't there more to this answer? I remember he started talking about how advanced these alien beings might be and how they could advance beyond the physical plane and crap.

[TheNightBreaker]

Cool

[RitmoXL]

Dont forget about Mr. Arthur C. Clarke now...

[onemancomedy]

wait i know this is going to sound really stupid but im now starting to do some "research" on the space odyssey thing anyway why is this interview so old if the movies name was 2001:Space Odyssey?

[dragannov]

man, that film is from 1968

[onemancomedy]

wow and why did he name it 2001? it was such a distant year from 1968

[dragannov]

you must be very, very young...

one day you'll grow up and some things will be more clear to you..

for now, just enjoy the life

[onemancomedy]

jesus im not 3 years old you know

[Druffmaul]

You might as well be, you're apparently about as dim witted as a toddler.

[onemancomedy]

and your an asshole see? its not fun being offended now is it..no no its not

[Druffmaul]

I wouldn't know. I don't really find it particularly offensive when a moron spews profanity at me.

[onemancomedy]

you a moron spews profanity at me

[DaRiceking]

If you were a real Kubrick fan you'd know that he used the cause of humanity turned machine as a metaphor and not in a literal sense. You fail at bringing any meaning to this philosophy.

[onemancomedy]

im not a fan at all i asked a question and assholes bombarded me with their "open minds"

[impalabeeper]

@onemancomedy

Your 'fans' must be really old, serious, lifeless and single people who can't see you are asking a simple question.

[Gabbrany]

Oh, come on! Stop picking on onemancomedy. If Kubrick had wanted every person in the audience while watching his movies to be a philosopher when interpreting them, then that would just have been silly. Yes, his films are complex. But, you all don't need to pick on someone because they can't necessarily see that "as well as" you. You might as well go around complaining that the majority of people can't see the subtle nuances in Big Mama's House 2...

[0eulogra0]

@Gabbrany The second one was indeed really deep.

[dialF4flipit]

@onemancomedy Only one word: Future. Period. End of Story.

[BestOfTheBestNumber9]

Why is it shallow? I've never mentioned his eyes. I've talked way too much about his films and "intellectual mind". You don't know what you're saying.

[BestOfTheBestNumber9]

Many people love his eyes. I remember reading a quote by some friend of his when he stated "the most piercing eyes I've ever seen"...

[Cetramarius]

So instead of considering the intellectual mind this man is known for and shares a bit of in this interview. You talk about his looks. How shallow.

[RainMan002]

@Cetramarius The eyes are the most influenced by personality and spirit of all physical traits. To not know that, you must be pretty shallow. Try looking into some one's eyes. You'll get to know them better than you possibly can by talking to them.

[AdamArmand]

i love his eyes.

[lupash]

Nicole Kidman does too. XD I saw an her interview where she talked about Kubrick's eyes. That's so curious.

[nikozcinematics]

cool!

where did you find it??

[GoblinGirl]

Cool video. Not much out there of Kubrick himself on video/film.