it's always the same. You see the beautiful old Reinhardt, (or, less favoured by me rothko) but whatever they hang there to speak for themselves, they speak for themselves, i really believe they do, i love those late Reinhardt's and then all the flubbydubby art-i tell then u mayb understand-why its worthwhile to look at-mumblejumble.
And for what? the new fluff of the youngsters we will never hear about over ten years. its a shame.
Unfortunately, I shot about an hour, 60 or 70 separate takes and then spent a long time over the course of a couple of days splicing it together so it looks simple. Oh my aching back.
Other good reasons for limiting it to 10 minutes: one shoots less footage, makes for quicker editing and saves on your hard drive space. Video files are huge. Your short video revealed so much more the feel of the exhibit than all the links to images (used for this show) in the Guggenheim website.
part of the intention of this show was to pose the kinds of shared sensibilities and unexpected juxtaposed similarities that you mention. There were several other examples that I could have featured if I had 10 more minutes, but I'm trying to stay away from the two part format. If possible you should visit the exhibition and see for yourself, one of the better museum shows in New York this summer, thanks JK
I love the dialog between the Calder and the Friedman. That is an historical approach we dont see often enough these days. The Bontecou/Gober pairing is different, I need time to think about the significance of that. My first reaction is to link the holes imagery of both- Bontecou's hole as abstract voids and Gober's drain holes- both entrances/exits into/from another world/dimension. I have never used the back/slash so much! //// its fun!/// / Kinda like karate!
it's always the same. You see the beautiful old Reinhardt, (or, less favoured by me rothko) but whatever they hang there to speak for themselves, they speak for themselves, i really believe they do, i love those late Reinhardt's and then all the flubbydubby art-i tell then u mayb understand-why its worthwhile to look at-mumblejumble.
And for what? the new fluff of the youngsters we will never hear about over ten years. its a shame.
cybeavertoo 4 years ago
Thanks for that! I am just interested to know are video cameras usually allowed in the Guggenheim or did you have special permission to film?
rofea 4 years ago
well, thanks for doing all that work!
artboy2 4 years ago
Unfortunately, I shot about an hour, 60 or 70 separate takes and then spent a long time over the course of a couple of days splicing it together so it looks simple. Oh my aching back.
jameskalm 4 years ago
Other good reasons for limiting it to 10 minutes: one shoots less footage, makes for quicker editing and saves on your hard drive space. Video files are huge. Your short video revealed so much more the feel of the exhibit than all the links to images (used for this show) in the Guggenheim website.
tiglath 4 years ago
artboy2,
part of the intention of this show was to pose the kinds of shared sensibilities and unexpected juxtaposed similarities that you mention. There were several other examples that I could have featured if I had 10 more minutes, but I'm trying to stay away from the two part format. If possible you should visit the exhibition and see for yourself, one of the better museum shows in New York this summer, thanks JK
jameskalm 4 years ago
I love the dialog between the Calder and the Friedman. That is an historical approach we dont see often enough these days. The Bontecou/Gober pairing is different, I need time to think about the significance of that. My first reaction is to link the holes imagery of both- Bontecou's hole as abstract voids and Gober's drain holes- both entrances/exits into/from another world/dimension. I have never used the back/slash so much! //// its fun!/// / Kinda like karate!
artboy2 4 years ago