Remember the spirit of empowerment grants you the agency to choose; the bondage of slavery seek to bind and control you! The choice is yours, choose wisely!
Thus to you, Mr. Lau, I would like to challenge you, instead of trying to drive a wedge between the old and the young generation in order to sabotage or slow down the HK democratic movement , why don't you empower HK ppl to think big, to stand a little taller, to envision a win-win situation with a society that can enjoy the fruit of economic development and competition while maintaining the social and spiritual values.
However what Mr. Lau "has forgotten" to mention or try deliberately to omit is that more and more ppl in the affluent societies are embracing the post-materialist value.
...less on social and spiritual values. Also pay attention to how Mr. Lau deliberately drives a wedge between the younger and the older generations. Brand the young as PM and the old as M. As far as I can tell, those who r in the opposition parties as Mr. Lau mentioned(see 1:40) are just old as Mr. Lau himself:)
...22% to 35%. Also I think Mr. Lau has conducted his own research. In order words, Mr. Lau is saying the majority of HK ppl will tolerate a more authoritarian government, value the HK economic development and competition more than personal freedom, and value less on social and spiritual values.
tends to value the economic development above protecting the environment. Ms will also support more authoritarian styles of leadership and will be more willing to sacrifice civil liberties for the sake of law and order. Thus it is this sociological theory of PM developed in 70's by Ronald Inglehart that Mr. Lau is using to predicate the PM is not the mainstream value of HK ppl. Because, according the so-called "Inglehart-Index", the % of PMs in affluent societies are only among 22% to 35%.
In order to understand why the concept of post-materialism(PM) which Mr. Lau thinks the young ppl value so much cannot represent the mainstream value, which is the concept of materialism(M), of HK ppl, we need to know what is PM. Simply put it, supporters of PM value freedom of speech, want more say in government policy making, demand more social justice, focus on protecting environment, and are more self-expressive. On the other hand, the supporters of M tends to value the economic...
I really don't understand why the proposal of getting rid of functional constituency (FC) is branded as "aggressive action". Personally I am against FC. However if the majority of HK ppl want to preserve it (assuming HK has a real democratic election, and the majority vote for the SAR administrator and the legislators who advocate preserving FC), I will accept and respect the voice of the ppl. Let the people choose!
can anyone find the video that he said 臨界點? please post
Raychik 11 months ago
@Raychik
劉兆佳：港陷臨界點@00:56
watch?v=Y1oEt_42C3g
vincidolphin 11 months ago
說了又否認，中大之恥！擱置了孫中山立像中大，又想共匪北京直接干擾香港行政，正一共匪大陸豬畜牲，婊子一族文痞!
herbkliu 1 year ago
此乃香港罪人理應拉去打耙
lekylau 1 year ago
what is 主流民意 ?
cheeplyOwasp 1 year ago
劉兆佳正垃圾
lizesheng159168 1 year ago
奴隶制(共产主义)，奴隶主(共产党)拥有奴隶(人民)的制度。奴隶(人民)须为奴隶主(共产党)干活，无报酬，且无人身自由。法律确认奴隶为奴隶主的私有财产，共产主义跟奴隶制也一样，国家所有财产归共产党。人民跟本不可能享受自己生产所得的回报。奴隶主(共产党)对奴隶(人民)握有生杀予夺的权力，可随意奴役、杀害。奴隶(人民)没有独立的人格，没有任何自由和权利。
antisocialism 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
开口闭口主流民意，孰不知香港更本没有主流民意，因为这样的政治 系统底下更本没有主流民意一说，你去问问北韩的主流民意是什么？当然是把美国炸了，你能同意么？请这位先生搞清楚逻辑，把主流民意拿来做为理论的武器的时候，也要看看这是不是一管可以开火的枪！取消功能组别，全民普选特首之日，才可以在这里讲主流民意！
samgu3990 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
samgu3990 2 years ago
你真係唔知同市民隔左幾遠~
坐係屋企信警方數字黎做野你就大獲啦!
MrJunleung 2 years ago
Remember the spirit of empowerment grants you the agency to choose; the bondage of slavery seek to bind and control you! The choice is yours, choose wisely!
DonaldTsang2017 2 years ago
Thus to you, Mr. Lau, I would like to challenge you, instead of trying to drive a wedge between the old and the young generation in order to sabotage or slow down the HK democratic movement , why don't you empower HK ppl to think big, to stand a little taller, to envision a win-win situation with a society that can enjoy the fruit of economic development and competition while maintaining the social and spiritual values.
DonaldTsang2017 2 years ago
However what Mr. Lau "has forgotten" to mention or try deliberately to omit is that more and more ppl in the affluent societies are embracing the post-materialist value.
DonaldTsang2017 2 years ago
...less on social and spiritual values. Also pay attention to how Mr. Lau deliberately drives a wedge between the younger and the older generations. Brand the young as PM and the old as M. As far as I can tell, those who r in the opposition parties as Mr. Lau mentioned(see 1:40) are just old as Mr. Lau himself:)
DonaldTsang2017 2 years ago
...22% to 35%. Also I think Mr. Lau has conducted his own research. In order words, Mr. Lau is saying the majority of HK ppl will tolerate a more authoritarian government, value the HK economic development and competition more than personal freedom, and value less on social and spiritual values.
DonaldTsang2017 2 years ago
tends to value the economic development above protecting the environment. Ms will also support more authoritarian styles of leadership and will be more willing to sacrifice civil liberties for the sake of law and order. Thus it is this sociological theory of PM developed in 70's by Ronald Inglehart that Mr. Lau is using to predicate the PM is not the mainstream value of HK ppl. Because, according the so-called "Inglehart-Index", the % of PMs in affluent societies are only among 22% to 35%.
DonaldTsang2017 2 years ago
In order to understand why the concept of post-materialism(PM) which Mr. Lau thinks the young ppl value so much cannot represent the mainstream value, which is the concept of materialism(M), of HK ppl, we need to know what is PM. Simply put it, supporters of PM value freedom of speech, want more say in government policy making, demand more social justice, focus on protecting environment, and are more self-expressive. On the other hand, the supporters of M tends to value the economic...
DonaldTsang2017 2 years ago
哈！劉生，你份工都幾好撈。
吓吓估錯都唔使畀人炒，令香港三百多萬打工仔羨慕不已。
不清楚主流民意的是HKSAR！
超過1200000市民活在貧窮線以下！!
人均收入躍升，但堅尼系數(Gini coefficient)亦然！!!
官商勾結、貧富懸殊、新聞自由/施法獨立性委縮、警察濫權.....罄竹難書！
不少人如此君，入了建制隨即跟社會脫節。香港靠呢班"生蟲枴杖"管治，想有運行都幾難！
ivorychau 2 years ago
please elaborate what is "
chansiuman48 2 years ago
Mr. Lau,
I really don't understand why the proposal of getting rid of functional constituency (FC) is branded as "aggressive action". Personally I am against FC. However if the majority of HK ppl want to preserve it (assuming HK has a real democratic election, and the majority vote for the SAR administrator and the legislators who advocate preserving FC), I will accept and respect the voice of the ppl. Let the people choose!
DonaldTsang2017 2 years ago
仆...佳叔,你講的主流民意是你們幾百隻野或你們自己想像出來的主流民意,不是我或大多數港人的主流民意, 亦不是與事實相符的主流民意
GothicGreta124 2 years ago 3
只要睇返佢對 23條, 慳電膽 既評論, 就知佢有嘜料。
呢條友做 香港政府政策組首席顧問 咁耐, 政府民望就衰咁耐!
willbetter1983 2 years ago 3
注意: 小心比呢班後生攪死你,當你覺得無剎傷力時,往往就係比佢羅你命時候,幾個人變左幾千人己經証明開始有好多人信佢地做法同理念,唔信政府同共產黨,大家需要表達出黎,
cwkhk1972 2 years ago
以前未入政府時, 說三道四, 講d政策點點點
之後被邀請入政府, 政府聽你講之後有好過咩?
laueye 2 years ago 4
其實23條之後，佢就應該退位讓賢啦~
成日講掌握主流民意
但次次都誤判
stanleylai86 2 years ago 4
@stanleylai86
He can only focus his own mainstream of urine during urination into the urinal. :0
yingnam 2 years ago
Agree to you, ho~ ho~ ho~
vincidolphin 2 years ago
聽佢講咗幾句，已經知道佢想講乜，根本廢話連篇。香港政府政策組首席顧問喎！What a big joke!!
samtai56 2 years ago
哎!自從他做了政府喉舌之後,我已經唔再聽佢講o野,可能佢唔知道自已以不能代表學者身份來講o野啦.已經不中立了.
myeaffair 2 years ago
yes, not that they don't know, it is they don't care - most of them are not elected anyway, so they don't have to care
well, what can he do? he works for the govt, so he has to speak for the govt
newtestube 2 years ago
佢老鹵，聽佢講咗幾句，已經知道佢想講乜，根本廢話連篇。
oldman020701 2 years ago 3
香港政府政策組首席顧問喎！全港最叻係佢。
equity0101 2 years ago
真係 on 9
出黎 果 d 人 唔係 個個都係 80 後
而 傳媒 班 撚樣 記者 亂咁用 個 詞
有d 仲要搞到 分 咩 70 後 60 後
佢老尾 50 後 都抱撚晒啦
freebombs 2 years ago 3
(d利根) 就唔好講廢話啦
him226 2 years ago 2
算吧啦依條佳叔...
03年開始估錯...年年皆是,政策組既政策係for共產黨商家而唔係中低下層市民
tvb0news0is0crap 2 years ago 3
政府無能, 政策組又不能看清問題所在. 無怪乎政府跟人民越行越遠.
KC1848 2 years ago 8
佢究景知唔知咩先係主流民意??
主流民意就係要一人一票選特首,取消功能組別.
alexharpl 2 years ago 6
似足 六四 鄧小平老伯伯
MrShuisee 2 years ago 8
呢條友out到嘔，重out過老鵬飛.
唔該呢個阿伯去睇下琴晚大鳴大放張楚勇講乜？
4564345 2 years ago 6