Added: 9 months ago
From: TheWatcherReptilian2
Views: 4,975
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (79)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Good vid. The new translations are definately evil. Don't make the mistake of thinking that the KJV is perfect. There are poor translations in it too, but they are inadvertant mistakes unlike the blatant and purposeful deception found in the new translation. Get a KJV and an older Strong's Concordance. The newer ones have been perverted as well. I also recommend the Companion Bible by Kregel Publications. It's a KJV cross reference bible that's very insightful.

  • For english native speakers get the King James Bible. For spanish native speakers get the Reina Valera Gomez Bible. It's just that they should have used the word "love" instead of "charity" in 1 Corinthians 14. But other than that, those 2 Bibles I mentioned are the best.

  • The church of my mom use a "revisited" and "modern" version of the Bible, they use hades instead hell, I told them that the hades is the underworld in Greek mythology and why they use this stuff to explain God issues, and they do not believe me, and this video is the total prove that I'm not wrong, they told me, because the hell still do not exist, and I answered, well if hell is not on stage now, why Bible talk about hades? the home of whom is right now? who lives there?... ambiguous answer.

  • I love your stuff so much!!! Finally a Christian who took the red pill!!!

  • So only KJV keeps original version right? Please reply to my message it is really important for me

  • Thank you for putting this together :)

    I will have to watch your whole series :)

  • triquetra is IMO jsut like Cross, it can be used for occultim or for christianity.it is it being used exacly so, rosecrucian occultists used INRI cross, even a.Crowley used crosses as elemnts of his occultism that's why bands like blakc saabth used them as sort of protection symbols like some use ankh or pentragrams etc.i will never claim nothing else, and i seriuosly disrespect you for bringing down P.O.D. cuz if you would really know about their good fruits ive seen you wouldn tie dem intoevil

  • That's the same mark Treyarch uses. :-O

  • Wonderful Video with great info..thanks

  • Also NIV 1 John 4:3 is way different (don't remember if that was the scripture guy pointed out).

  • No one mentioned that Murdoch owns the copyright to the NIV AND satanic bible! It's infiltrated...my church swears by NIV. I see the differences when we are reading outloud and I don't like what I hear. I am a KJV onlyist...mainly because my first Bible, which is still the same one I use today, was given to me 26 yrs ago. If they had given me something else, I would probably like that BUT God! I take my time to understand KJV, I don't gloss over the reading to try to get a quick fix.

  • Wow :O that was surprising.. I honestly didn't know all of that about the newer editions and translations. Thank God for this video - God bless you guys for making this and spreading the word!

    May I ask your opinion of the Tyndale/Matthews Bible though? and those new Bibles now called "The Scriptures"?

  • @jon82hall Well thousands was clearly an exaggeration, I meant a lot by that statement. Don't worry, I don't take things to heart, I hope I havn't offended you either. I really do hope you will look into textual criticism and see that there is no conspiracy with the omission of certain verses. Take care, God bless.

  • @jon82hall When did I claim to know a lot? Actually I claim the opposite. What were the earliest Christian symbols for representing the trinity? Again, what part of James White's writings or method of apologetics do you disagree with? I can see what is going on, but I have a problem when you try to demonize one of the foremost defenders of the faith because he uses a symbol that has been used for centuries to represent the trinity. Your wild and fallacious accusations won't wash with me!

  • @jon82hall Unbelievable! So you have hung, drawn and quartered a man and condemned him as a satanist, because he has a particular symbol on the front of his book? I think you are the one who is misguided. Is it possible that 3 interlocking circles could been seen by someone to represent the trinity? So what part of Dr Whites writings do you not agree with? I am baffled with some peoples surface level argumentation, do you know how much James White has done in defence of the Christian faith.

  • @jon82hall By the sounds of it, you have only recieved second hand research and havn't looked into some of these issues for yourself. I really do implore you to look into textual criticism, then you will surely realize that King James onlyism is foolish, it is just not logical. I agree with criticism of the new age movement and things of that nature, but you've got to know where to stop with the conspircacy's, or they can go on forever.

  • @jon82hall I have seen every video that Walter Veith has done on the subject, he has some good information but often takes quotes out of context. Bill cooper also had some good information but was seemingly a heretic in his claim that Apostles Paul and John were part of the mystery schools.

  • @jon82hall I only just saw your comment asking if I was a Christian. Yes I am a Christian, and I do believe that Jesus Christ was sent by the Father to die for His peoples sins. That is why I am interested in textual criticism and why I would want fellow believers to look into it, because when a non Christian knows his stuff and challenges you on the subject, you will look foolish if you are unaware of variants.

  • @jon82hall Yes I have seen about a thousand documentaries on those sorts of things. Do you recommend any lecturers or teachers on those subjects? But if Murdoch had tried to change the Bible in the way that you are suggesting then it would be blatanly obvious. Again, a small amount of study into textual criticism would answer the false ideas that you have in this area. I myself used to believe in all the things that you have mentioned, and I still do hold to some of them.

  • Comment removed

  • @jon82hall It is not just that we disagree, it is that you are wrong, and are following a cultic movement that will leave you in ignorance. Just do a basic study of textual criticism and you will come to very different conclusions. God bless.

  • @jon82hall Well it is obviously a variant if it didn't appear in the earliest manuscripts. That verse is a minority reading, and that is why it is omitted. Any critical addition of the Bible will confirm this.

  • @jon82hall What are your sources for these claims?

  • @jon82hall The NIV claims to clear things up; where? Where did I give a definitoon of the word ''river''? because I don't remember doing so. All I suggested was, looking back into the hebrew of that verse, and seeing what the literal translation is. Maybe the NIV translates that verse badly, I don't know, but the conspiracy that you ar suggesting is proposterous.

  • @jon82hall It is also 'river' in the ESV that I possess, why don't you look into the Hebrew meaning of the origional words, rather than assuming something untoward? In mine and a lot of other people's opinion, the NIV is not the best translation, but that doesn't mean they are trying to destroy Christianity. I seriously recommend looking into textual criticism, there are a lot of atheists and other enemies of the faith who know about this, so if you remain ignorant they will catch you off guard.

  • What song is that @9:00?

  • @jon82hall Acts 8:37 is s a textual variant, meaning, the verse is not found in the earliest manuscripts. As it disagress with all the earliest copies of Acts, it is clear that it was a later addition. Don't you think that all of the faithful Bible scholars down the ages, would be aware if any conspiracy to remove Bible verses was taking place? It is only this modern fringe group (King James onlyists), who try to concoct a conspiracy, when really it is a lack of understanding on their part.

  • This video is simply naive. Bill Schnoebelen doesn't know what he is talking about. Do a bit of meaningful research on textual criticism, and then you might understand the changes in the modern Bibles.

  • wasent king james a master of wichcraft?

  • hi , could you please let me know what music you used in this video

  • Link to 51 plz

  • HalleluYah!!! much love, & appreciation!!!

  • Interesting insight. Looking at and reading the Bible word for word, you really get a different perspective on the truth. Looking up the origin of the words found in the Bible will also bring insight as well.

  • where can i watch part 51 plz send me a link

  • @supersyrette if you subscribe or go to his page you can find them all or have them sent to you when posted?!

  • @charliebad no they blocked it im lookin for another link i watched half this morning went to watch the rest now its takin out :(

  • @supersyrette look it up on daily motion

  • take pauls writings out and even more garbage leaves the word

  • @OrbitalAngel So you noticed too!?!

  • @ChrisnStarry it hard not too my eyes are wide open :)

  • what are the first and last songs on this video ????

  • Parents shouldn't named their kids Glen. They must get teased a lot for it. There's two satanic rock musicians named Glen. Danzig and this Benton guy.

  • Manifesto of the "World Jewish Federation," January 1, 1935, through its

    spokesperson, Gerald Soman. "No one can deny that the Jews are a most unique and unusual people. That uniqueness exists because of their EDOMITE heritage. You cannot be English Jews. We are a race, and only as a race can we perpetuate. Our mentality is of EDOMITISH character, and differs from that of an Englishman. Enough subterfuges! Let us assert openly that we are International Jews."

    EDOMITE'S ARE SATAN'S NWO.

  • FELLOW 'EUROPEAN'S', "RUSSIAN'S", "AMERICAN'S", EASTERN EUROPEAN'S, WESTERN EUROPEAN'S.. YOU ARE THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL. WE ARE JACOB/ISRAEL.

    THIS IS THE GREATEST TRICK THE DEVIL AND HIS CHILDREN EVER PULLED// CONVINCING THE WORLD THEY WERE US!

    "JEWS" (THIS WORD DIDN'T APPEAR UNTIL THE 19th CENTURY IN OUR HOLY BOOK) ARE CANAANITE - EDOMITE'S... THE LINE OF CAIN, SATAN'S SEED! WE HAVE BEEN IN A HOLY WAR WITH THIS PEOPLE SINCE THE BEGINNING. THEY PRETEND TO BE US.. YAHWEH'S CHILDREN.

  • HERE IS WISDOM. TWO SEEDLINES- MY PEOPLE vs SATAN'S PEOPLE. EDOM EDOMITE'S ARE "JEWS", SATAN'S SEEDLINE. THE PROOF- * "The edomites today are found in modern Jewry" The Jewish Encyclopedia, Volume 4, page 41. * GENESIS 36:43- " Esau was the father of the Edomites." * "As it is written, Jacob I have loved but Esau I have HATED." Romans 9:13 * ISAIAH 34:5- "For my sword shall be bathed in heaven; Indeed it shall come down on EDOM, And on THE PEOPLE OF MY CURSE, for judgement." *
  • Awesome! Thank You and God Bless

  • great video mate ! KJV is the only bible !

  • Amen…

  • Asalaam Alaikum, brother. Haven't seen you post anything in a while. I have to ask you - what do you say to the claim that King James the VI was a freemason and Francis Bacon assisted (or proofread) the KJV?

  • @TheInsurgent1 Yup they were and changed Psalms 117 to 33 words instead of 32 words. This is the middle of the bible and KJ was gay and Bacon was Freemason! Worked for the vatican to get rid of the Geneva bible. The kicker is the pagans names they put in like Lord, god, jesus, jehovah.

  • Amazing. Heaven truly awaits you.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more