@Uachintom That theory has been around since I was a child, in the 50's. A Sumerian or was it Mayan legend says a planet (Tiamat) hit the earth and cracked it and part of the earth was thrown into space and reconstituted into the moon
What a retard.. says the moon is 384,403 km from earth...uuhh the moons distance varys from over 400,000 to about 360,000 (too wiki reliant) ....230,000,000 is millions not billions (thanks Dr Evil) maths is clearly not your strongpoint. When wales beach themselves they often die because their weight is too great to support. I wonder if you can tell me how a massive, lets say, Amphicoelias weighing 122 metric tons walked the earth, with your evolution story....physics would not allow it..hhmmm?
Here's why I believe this video is wrong (What 'I' believe in before you start flaming) If evolution is true, the earth is 4.6 billion years old. And at the speed the winds would have been back then anything living would not be able to survive 5,000mph winds, nor the floods caused by the moon. So then where did the dinosaurs come from 230 million years ago?
0:25 Why yes. Billions of years ago, the moon WOULD be touching the earth. Five billions of years ago, to be more precise. Back when the earth was still a big ball of magma and huge asteroid impacts were keeping it hot and boiling, and there was no life at all, and a particularly large collision knocked the moon out of it.
But that was well before dinosaurs, which were not billions of years ago but millions. Little difference in magnitude there. :)
there is also a theory that the moon was not always there to plus the furture the moon travels away from the earth the less graveltational pull it has so it would increase the speed of deparcher from the earth.
there is also a theory that the moon was not always there to plus the furture the moon travels away from the earth the less graveltational pull it has so it would increase the speed of deparcher from the earth.
I was kind of hoping that you would point out that dinosaurs did not lived billions of years ago. Only 230 to 65 million years ago (not counting their bird-descendants). How come creationists can't grasp simple math?
Well to be fair, this is actually one of the smallest mathematical errors I have seen creationists do.
In fact dinosaurs didn't live "Billions of years ago". The first reptiles appeared 360 million years ago in the Carboniferous period. So he's got one thing right at least. For a good laugh see dprjones "Craziest claim by a creationist - EVER" for an unique theory of dino extinction. However I think the claim that the moon used to bump into the earth should be in the running for the Golden Crocoduck.
I enjoyed the video but, do you feel the same about all creationist? I kind of figure myself as a creationist, as I belive that theres a driving force behind evolution. but anyways I completely agree. your right, he's a dipshit.
i'm into learning about evolution and all that jazz. i mean jazz very loosely. i wonder have you seen those videos about how artefacts, paintings and clay figures looking like apprent dinosaur creatures that refute evolution and calim man walked wiht the dinosaur. well there's an obvious fail, perhaps you could do youtube video on that, explaining to those ppl that man did not live with the dinosuars cause i think it needs to be done.
i'm into learning about evolution and all that jazz. i mean jazz very loosely. i wonder have you seen those videos about how artefacts, paintings and clay figures looking like apprent dinosaur creatures that refute evolution and calim man walked wiht the dinosaur. well there's an obvious fail, perhaps you could do youtube video on that, explaining to those ppl that man did not live with the dinosuars cause i think it needs to be done.
Haha, love it!!! Even though I do belive that there may be a god or even several gods, however I don't believe the load of bollocks put forth by "Creationists". Earth 6000 years old? Doh!
i agree dinosaurs didn't exist billions of years ago. the beginning of live on earth started with microscopic Amoebas which over millions of generations n adapting to its environment. and after so long of that u get the fish n other primitive sea creatures n to those who dont understand evolution look up walking with monsters then walking with dinosaurs. i know its a tv series n mostly all of its true. so dinosaurs didn't exist billions of years ago no it was 220.000.000 years ago
@luc89ass there is also a theory that the moon was not always there to plus the furture the moon travels away from the earth the less graveltational pull it has so it would increase the speed of deparcher from the earth.
@southpawl1 Are you aware that the moon travels toward the earth by up to almost 50,000 km during its cycle? Have a really good think about this. It travels away to a distance of aprox 405,000 km at its furthest, then stops.......... then back toward the earth until, at its closest, it is about 356,000 km away. Understand that this is akin to a Lagrange point (please research).
@southpawl1 Not only is the gravity between the earth and the moon sufficient enough to hold the moon right where it needs to be, it will actually pull the moon back when it strays from this Lagrange point. When you research Lagrange points, and you make the realization that the moon will never depart earth, or crash into it, it does pose an interesting question..... why would such a blatant lie be told?
@kaderoder wtf are you guys talking about? yes the moon is on an elliptical orbit. But thanks to the moon mission, which placed a reflective plate on the moon, a laser can be beamed at this plate and the time it takes to reflect back can be measured.
I'll also include a link to astronomy magazine in which a question is asked "i heard that the moon moves an inch away each year."
thank god. i thought the whole world was mental when i watched the other video. how can people be so weird? that video was embarrasing to all of us. thanks so much for making me feel normal again!
Dragons...? Legendary? Anyway, they lived millions of years before humans and went extinct before humans had any kind of interaction with the. And yes, they are probably all dead. Some have obviously evolved but I'd say that's about it. None of the same dinosaur species that lived tens of millions of years ago live now.
Ofc ur right about the fact that none of the ancient species still exists, but the modern birds are considered to be dinosaurs nowdays.
in any case good vid, and everyone knows the creationists cant do math, if so they would never believe 2 people became 6,9 billion in a mere 6000 years - then the great flood, so it would be like a 3 "MALES" who would give birth to these 6,9 billion in "i will do a creationist imagination thing and say" 3000-4000 years... awesome
Ad hominem, yes when deserved. But I also gave better math than the fucking retard (oh wait there I go again with the ad hominens, though the guy is a fucking retard). Yes, they did find a well preserved one. This is due to many different factors. Most of the fossils are not like this. Please go spout your gibberish somewhere else, unless you can give me peer-reviewed scientific literature which states otherwise. Kthxbai
I think it was short, clear colorful, and shiny enough to cater to someone with the intelligence of a creationist. Well done. Now we just have to combat the next creationist myth: Gay marriage killed the dinosaurs.
you're right, its silly to believe the world was intelligently designed - haha - the only reason evolution needs billions of years is because it increases the chances of zillions of mutations leading us to today. an "old age" theory only came about in the last 150 years - is that out of 6000 years, or 1.2 million, or billions? just interesting there was no "proof" until then on such a critical philosophy. Check out Ben Stein's new movie.
I have. Refuting a evolution does not prove creation. We have fact based reasons to strongly believe that the earth was formed billions of years ago. Creationism does not really have any facts of it's own to prove itsef. It only tries to disprove evolution and use bible as a reference for the age of the earth. Yes it indeed is silly to believe that the earth was designed by a being _outside_ reality and physics. God does not comply with physics.
Because they did the extremely scientific and accurate process of counting up the ages of a bunch of guys from a poorly-translated, several-thousand year old tome that tells them there was light before the sun and that women have less ribs than men.
I, for one, don't see any way science can refute *that*, let alone logic and reason.
Silence infidel! Zere ist hell und zere ist heaven. Ze über God will judge you and send you zere, ze hell, ze worst one of ze two. Repent!
But yes, indeed. Anyone who holds these infantile beliefs still in the 21st century should be educated (and if that doesn't work laughed at and ridiculed) by the sane. Oh, yeah, remember to repent.
I will check out your initial facts, they differ from what I have heard. The math rests on those facts. When they went to the moon they thought based on the age of the moon there would be feet and feet of dust on the ground, but there was juat a few inches. The dinosours living with mankind idea is also hard to get around - The shape of a dino was painted on caves years ago, the idea of dragon's is really old, that all dino are is giant lizards, minus charcoal breath. I wish you were kinder.
Be kind to an idea of a 6000 year old earth and other absolutely incomprehensibly absurd statements? Why should I? It is not my job to be kind. If people want to live in ignorance, ok. But this is just ridiculous.
We have so much genetic, fossil, and empirical evidence to support the theory of evolution that scientists can't publish papers fast enough to keep up with it.
And you demand respect for your speculative claim that since there was lizard art in caves (prove that btw) humans lived with dinosaurs?
You must be joking...
That's like saying since the ancient Egyptians made statues of Sphinxes, they must have lived with Sphinxes.
not supposed to be mature but to point out how ridiculous it is to believe that the earth is 6000 years old and believe that carbon-dating is not true, fossils are a lie and so forth. It is completely absurd to believe in a "young" earth.
*millions my bad
JimOconee 5 months ago
They did live billions of years ago because they have carbon dating technology that can give a very accurate reading on the age of the fossils.
JimOconee 5 months ago
i don't understand all those numbers
electricitychick 5 months ago
Nice job. But he won't listen.
perstaere 6 months ago
Actually now there is a theory that the moon was a part of the earth, right where is the actual ocean pacific...
Uachintom 6 months ago
@Uachintom Which has what to do with this? It's irrelevant to this since the theory states the moon was made billions of years ago.
HimesInu 6 months ago
@Uachintom That theory has been around since I was a child, in the 50's. A Sumerian or was it Mayan legend says a planet (Tiamat) hit the earth and cracked it and part of the earth was thrown into space and reconstituted into the moon
TheDano1947 4 months ago
What a retard.. says the moon is 384,403 km from earth...uuhh the moons distance varys from over 400,000 to about 360,000 (too wiki reliant) ....230,000,000 is millions not billions (thanks Dr Evil) maths is clearly not your strongpoint. When wales beach themselves they often die because their weight is too great to support. I wonder if you can tell me how a massive, lets say, Amphicoelias weighing 122 metric tons walked the earth, with your evolution story....physics would not allow it..hhmmm?
kaderoder 7 months ago
Here's why I believe this video is wrong (What 'I' believe in before you start flaming) If evolution is true, the earth is 4.6 billion years old. And at the speed the winds would have been back then anything living would not be able to survive 5,000mph winds, nor the floods caused by the moon. So then where did the dinosaurs come from 230 million years ago?
RG7621 9 months ago
0:25 Why yes. Billions of years ago, the moon WOULD be touching the earth. Five billions of years ago, to be more precise. Back when the earth was still a big ball of magma and huge asteroid impacts were keeping it hot and boiling, and there was no life at all, and a particularly large collision knocked the moon out of it.
But that was well before dinosaurs, which were not billions of years ago but millions. Little difference in magnitude there. :)
rkyeun 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there is also a theory that the moon was not always there to plus the furture the moon travels away from the earth the less graveltational pull it has so it would increase the speed of deparcher from the earth.
southpawl1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there is also a theory that the moon was not always there to plus the furture the moon travels away from the earth the less graveltational pull it has so it would increase the speed of deparcher from the earth.
southpawl1 1 year ago
I was kind of hoping that you would point out that dinosaurs did not lived billions of years ago. Only 230 to 65 million years ago (not counting their bird-descendants). How come creationists can't grasp simple math?
Well to be fair, this is actually one of the smallest mathematical errors I have seen creationists do.
greyman000 1 year ago
In fact dinosaurs didn't live "Billions of years ago". The first reptiles appeared 360 million years ago in the Carboniferous period. So he's got one thing right at least. For a good laugh see dprjones "Craziest claim by a creationist - EVER" for an unique theory of dino extinction. However I think the claim that the moon used to bump into the earth should be in the running for the Golden Crocoduck.
colourmegone 1 year ago
I enjoyed the video but, do you feel the same about all creationist? I kind of figure myself as a creationist, as I belive that theres a driving force behind evolution. but anyways I completely agree. your right, he's a dipshit.
KingOfZilla 1 year ago
@KingOfZilla if u dont deny the evidence for evolution, i wouldnt class u as a creationist.. u just have a different perspective
Henrythecamel 1 year ago
they were wiped out by an everest sized rock that hit mexico, and the moon form 18000 km ABOVE the roche limit(or so i heard)
sonicchao112244 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i'm into learning about evolution and all that jazz. i mean jazz very loosely. i wonder have you seen those videos about how artefacts, paintings and clay figures looking like apprent dinosaur creatures that refute evolution and calim man walked wiht the dinosaur. well there's an obvious fail, perhaps you could do youtube video on that, explaining to those ppl that man did not live with the dinosuars cause i think it needs to be done.
JasonT586 1 year ago
i'm into learning about evolution and all that jazz. i mean jazz very loosely. i wonder have you seen those videos about how artefacts, paintings and clay figures looking like apprent dinosaur creatures that refute evolution and calim man walked wiht the dinosaur. well there's an obvious fail, perhaps you could do youtube video on that, explaining to those ppl that man did not live with the dinosuars cause i think it needs to be done.
JasonT586 1 year ago
Haha, love it!!! Even though I do belive that there may be a god or even several gods, however I don't believe the load of bollocks put forth by "Creationists". Earth 6000 years old? Doh!
theflamecantgetburnt 1 year ago
But wait! they can argue the earth stopping entirly and standing still for a day! god did it!
galahuth 1 year ago
Dinosaur didn't live billions of years ago, they ruled the earth for 150 million years, ending 65 million years ago.
gregrutz 2 years ago
i agree dinosaurs didn't exist billions of years ago. the beginning of live on earth started with microscopic Amoebas which over millions of generations n adapting to its environment. and after so long of that u get the fish n other primitive sea creatures n to those who dont understand evolution look up walking with monsters then walking with dinosaurs. i know its a tv series n mostly all of its true. so dinosaurs didn't exist billions of years ago no it was 220.000.000 years ago
super17a 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
and your an ignorant evolutionist
luc89ass 2 years ago
Please die in a fire.
nake89 2 years ago 8
Oh how I agree with you :D
PsychoNekoSan 1 year ago
@nake89 Yeah, Nake89, "your" an ignorant evilutionist.... what with all you're book learnin' 'n such...
markviman 1 year ago
and what exactly are you then? a smart creationist?
PsychoNekoSan 1 year ago
@PsychoNekoSan
a smart creationist? Isn't that an oxymoron?
TheKilgoretrout 1 year ago 2
@luc89ass You just used an oxymoron.
FSAthe1st 1 year ago
@luc89ass I bet you're the type of person who believes in god lol... I'm sorry; I didn't mean to insult you. But you are stupid.
Patka02 1 year ago
@luc89ass there is also a theory that the moon was not always there to plus the furture the moon travels away from the earth the less graveltational pull it has so it would increase the speed of deparcher from the earth.
southpawl1 1 year ago
@southpawl1 Are you aware that the moon travels toward the earth by up to almost 50,000 km during its cycle? Have a really good think about this. It travels away to a distance of aprox 405,000 km at its furthest, then stops.......... then back toward the earth until, at its closest, it is about 356,000 km away. Understand that this is akin to a Lagrange point (please research).
kaderoder 7 months ago
@southpawl1 Not only is the gravity between the earth and the moon sufficient enough to hold the moon right where it needs to be, it will actually pull the moon back when it strays from this Lagrange point. When you research Lagrange points, and you make the realization that the moon will never depart earth, or crash into it, it does pose an interesting question..... why would such a blatant lie be told?
kaderoder 7 months ago
@kaderoder wtf are you guys talking about? yes the moon is on an elliptical orbit. But thanks to the moon mission, which placed a reflective plate on the moon, a laser can be beamed at this plate and the time it takes to reflect back can be measured.
I'll also include a link to astronomy magazine in which a question is asked "i heard that the moon moves an inch away each year."
0mega519 7 months ago
@kaderoder ok it seems i cant post the link. just go to google.com and search "moon moving away". that simple
0mega519 7 months ago
@kaderoder Blatant lies have cash value.
rjdyou 6 months ago
@rjdyou Amen brother!
kaderoder 6 months ago
Comment removed
southpawl1 1 year ago
@luc89ass :
and? he's more intelligent than a creationist rat
Biguspikned 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@luc89ass: "and your an ignorant evolutionist"
And you're too ignorant to understand the difference between "your" and "you're". Oh the irony...
mikefromwa 7 months ago
lol IM a creationist, and i thought the other guy was an idiot. IM 13 and i realized how RETARTED he was...
JanochSunstrider 2 years ago 4
I applaud you :D
PsychoNekoSan 1 year ago
@JanochSunstrider 1 retard calling another retatrd a retard... well, thats something new.
avalsonline2 5 months ago
Thx for proving that idiot wrong
leonides456 2 years ago 2
Walter Brown doesn't even pretend to be a physicist or a biologist: His Ph. D. is in engineering (if he has one).
I wonder why Creationists don't try so hard. Maybe because they don't need to.
thallassocracy 2 years ago
They don't exist
if they did then giants to
DaTruthHurt 2 years ago
Does a man who is taller than 2 meters, count as a Giant?
Then yes...
But dinosaurs DID exist... crocodiles still exist though :)
PsychoNekoSan 1 year ago
creationists just got pwned
beyondbedandbathisme 2 years ago 2
thank god. i thought the whole world was mental when i watched the other video. how can people be so weird? that video was embarrasing to all of us. thanks so much for making me feel normal again!
jjcyrax 2 years ago
EPIC!!!
playplay123123 2 years ago
oh your kind of good, bravo! bravo!
nasri1011 2 years ago
BEST
VIDEO EVER
anshuvio3 2 years ago
i'm 12 and i liked this vid, but the maths scare me lol (your to good)
penguinman619 2 years ago
Yeah, they were the legendary "dragons" that were killed off through history. But I don't think they're all dead; they're just very, very rare now.
Eye2Eye35 2 years ago
Dragons...? Legendary? Anyway, they lived millions of years before humans and went extinct before humans had any kind of interaction with the. And yes, they are probably all dead. Some have obviously evolved but I'd say that's about it. None of the same dinosaur species that lived tens of millions of years ago live now.
nake89 2 years ago
@nake89
Ofc ur right about the fact that none of the ancient species still exists, but the modern birds are considered to be dinosaurs nowdays.
in any case good vid, and everyone knows the creationists cant do math, if so they would never believe 2 people became 6,9 billion in a mere 6000 years - then the great flood, so it would be like a 3 "MALES" who would give birth to these 6,9 billion in "i will do a creationist imagination thing and say" 3000-4000 years... awesome
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
I'd say that Komodo-Dragons and OF COURSE Crocodiles, are both modern non-fire-breathing dragons :D
PsychoNekoSan 1 year ago
lol nice job. the noob your responding to realy needs to go back to school...his arguments are just stupid..especialy the wind one..
agent12803 2 years ago 2
Attacking always Ad Hominem, cannot provide any evidence for Neo Darwinian Evolution. If Dinosaurs are Hundreds of millions of years old.
Then Why did they find in 2005 a Trex thigh bone with HemoGlobin and red blood cells? that would not last Hundreds of millions of years.
Zigguret 3 years ago
Ad hominem, yes when deserved. But I also gave better math than the fucking retard (oh wait there I go again with the ad hominens, though the guy is a fucking retard). Yes, they did find a well preserved one. This is due to many different factors. Most of the fossils are not like this. Please go spout your gibberish somewhere else, unless you can give me peer-reviewed scientific literature which states otherwise. Kthxbai
nake89 2 years ago
no the earth is 2009 year old dumbass
blockboy5609 3 years ago
Well of course it is
nake89 3 years ago
rofl
snapascrew 3 years ago
o.o
casinozx 2 years ago
the creationist just got pzownd
goflamesgofarts 3 years ago
PWNED!
doodles507 3 years ago
I think it was short, clear colorful, and shiny enough to cater to someone with the intelligence of a creationist. Well done. Now we just have to combat the next creationist myth: Gay marriage killed the dinosaurs.
RyeItGrrl 3 years ago
awesomeness
thegothicgirl14 3 years ago
OWNED!
japs209 3 years ago
funny reponse man you owned the bastard ...good math skill...lol
buakawkaoklai 3 years ago
THANK YOU!
DinoDumbassTV 3 years ago
you're right, its silly to believe the world was intelligently designed - haha - the only reason evolution needs billions of years is because it increases the chances of zillions of mutations leading us to today. an "old age" theory only came about in the last 150 years - is that out of 6000 years, or 1.2 million, or billions? just interesting there was no "proof" until then on such a critical philosophy. Check out Ben Stein's new movie.
JT
xsaintxjames 3 years ago
I have. Refuting a evolution does not prove creation. We have fact based reasons to strongly believe that the earth was formed billions of years ago. Creationism does not really have any facts of it's own to prove itsef. It only tries to disprove evolution and use bible as a reference for the age of the earth. Yes it indeed is silly to believe that the earth was designed by a being _outside_ reality and physics. God does not comply with physics.
nake89 3 years ago
Geology suggests it and it happens to work well with evolution.
And what is the reason that creations keep insisting that the earth is 6000 years old when geology says otherwise?
ryu1024 3 years ago
How do you date the rocks and fossils? what kind of inaccurate methods.
Zigguret 3 years ago
the same kind of radiometric methods used to make the most dangerous weapons known to humankind.......hardly inaccurate
Cefuroxx 3 years ago
Because they did the extremely scientific and accurate process of counting up the ages of a bunch of guys from a poorly-translated, several-thousand year old tome that tells them there was light before the sun and that women have less ribs than men.
I, for one, don't see any way science can refute *that*, let alone logic and reason.
popisfizzy 2 years ago
Silence infidel! Zere ist hell und zere ist heaven. Ze über God will judge you and send you zere, ze hell, ze worst one of ze two. Repent!
But yes, indeed. Anyone who holds these infantile beliefs still in the 21st century should be educated (and if that doesn't work laughed at and ridiculed) by the sane. Oh, yeah, remember to repent.
nake89 2 years ago
I will check out your initial facts, they differ from what I have heard. The math rests on those facts. When they went to the moon they thought based on the age of the moon there would be feet and feet of dust on the ground, but there was juat a few inches. The dinosours living with mankind idea is also hard to get around - The shape of a dino was painted on caves years ago, the idea of dragon's is really old, that all dino are is giant lizards, minus charcoal breath. I wish you were kinder.
xsaintxjames 3 years ago
Be kind to an idea of a 6000 year old earth and other absolutely incomprehensibly absurd statements? Why should I? It is not my job to be kind. If people want to live in ignorance, ok. But this is just ridiculous.
nake89 3 years ago
Xsaint,
We have so much genetic, fossil, and empirical evidence to support the theory of evolution that scientists can't publish papers fast enough to keep up with it.
And you demand respect for your speculative claim that since there was lizard art in caves (prove that btw) humans lived with dinosaurs?
You must be joking...
That's like saying since the ancient Egyptians made statues of Sphinxes, they must have lived with Sphinxes.
markBRMA 3 years ago
wow. this video was very mature. not
donkeypoo99 3 years ago
not supposed to be mature but to point out how ridiculous it is to believe that the earth is 6000 years old and believe that carbon-dating is not true, fossils are a lie and so forth. It is completely absurd to believe in a "young" earth.
nake89 3 years ago
Way to go man, nice way of pointing out the correct way to do math :D.
MizarShadow 3 years ago
THANK YOU for pointing out the stupidity of that idiot.
Cougs08 3 years ago
Crazy tides lolololo
junka22 3 years ago