fury u had it in the bag man x men origins was an origin movie without the origin that was wrapped up in the first 10 mins wolverine went from 10 to 30 in 10 mins we didnt really needa movie bassed around wolverine getting his bones we had x men one and two do that already what we had was basically a prequel to x men 3 done in the same rushed stlye trying to cram so much into so little i i repeat wolverine was shot in the face in thos first few mins so why does the bullet metal matter at all
I enjoyed Wolverine for the most part. I could easily pick some scenes that I thought were badly done or that ruined a particular character. Still I don't think it was a waste of my time and money.
We all have our opinions and I'm happy to hear somebody with a different opinion since it might make me reconsider my own. Fury is one of the most enjoyable movie sites.
Glad to hear that attitude. For a lot of people, a flaw means something is ruined, but sometimes the good stuff can be so good that the flaws don't even begin to matter, ya know?
Any complaints I could find about Wolverine were all comparisons to the comic, nothing about the movie's actual quality, so I choose not to consider them flaws. They changed Deadpool, big deal, when X-Men 1 came out, ALL of the characters were changed.
Thats good criticism. A good reviewer should always judge the movie based on its own merits, not what was left out from the source material.
However some comic movies like Garfield end up changing the characters so much that they throw out everything that made the character appealing in the first place.
Really well said, Fury, and motivational.... I really try to come from that insightful fan place you speak of; sometimes Gab or Dad get a little silly/harsh - but hopefully just in good fun! It's been educational to become part of and grow within the YouTube movie community, and hopefully G&D are evolving to the higher standard of which you speak. It really is about loving movies, and in a thoughtful and good-attitude way! Thanks so much for your example in this arena!
Well, I didn't watch Wolverine. I am and have been as long as I can remember, a big fan of comics including Spider-Man, X-Men, DD, Superman, Etc... So I look forward to any movie release based on comics. Having not watched this particular one yet, I felt like I was being impartial while listening to the debate last night. But in the end, both brought out excellent points and it really sounded like it was just a matter of what you expected the movie to be like going into it.
I'd like to say that Fury got my vote because my opinion is very similar to his. But that wouldn't be fair. That makes me biased. I think that the point by DistantJ about it just being a pure bad ass action flick showing Wolverine doing what he does best is great and make me actually want to see the movie even after all the negative reviews I've read and listened to.
I apologize but I give Fury 25 pts vs 20 pts DistantJ for point #5 adamantium bullet.
Well said Fury! I really hope one day we can have that little debate on Ben Button that we started having on blogtv. What a great movie... or in your opinion a snoozefest.
Well said fury! You realy take into account what kind of audiance and what level of deapth a movie brings. I don't realy or watch alot of reviews by mainstream critics, although I think Jonathon Ross is a realy good one personaly. Here in the UK, he hosts a show called "Film 2009 with Jonathon Ross" and he gives a very ballenced and detailed insite into the film. Dunno if you've heard of him or not, but you may like his reviews :).
How can you be negative? You gave "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" a positive review. These people have no common sense. It's like we can't dislike on a certain film anymore without getting an personal attack.
I've been with you since the start, Fury, and I can honestly say that your style, wit and good movie knowledge have not once been compromised! You're better than any so called 'critic' in the real world.
A hatred of an opinion is something I will never understand. People I'm subscribed too constantly have views opposing my own. I love Trick-R-Treat, you didn't. Mr.Black wasn't high on Spiderman 3, I was, you enjoyed Transformers 2, I hated it, but that doesn't mean that I should boil in anger and unsubscribe or go on an attack. That stuff is immature.
It's nothing new but I've noticed it get worse over the months. My goal is to build a community that brings together film fans. Spidey you are a prime example of someone who "gets it"
fury u had it in the bag man x men origins was an origin movie without the origin that was wrapped up in the first 10 mins wolverine went from 10 to 30 in 10 mins we didnt really needa movie bassed around wolverine getting his bones we had x men one and two do that already what we had was basically a prequel to x men 3 done in the same rushed stlye trying to cram so much into so little i i repeat wolverine was shot in the face in thos first few mins so why does the bullet metal matter at all
MajinHouse84 2 years ago
I've been an x-men fan since for like 17yrs, and i gotta say.. the fans like myself deserved better.
PumpkinEskobarr 2 years ago
I enjoyed Wolverine for the most part. I could easily pick some scenes that I thought were badly done or that ruined a particular character. Still I don't think it was a waste of my time and money.
We all have our opinions and I'm happy to hear somebody with a different opinion since it might make me reconsider my own. Fury is one of the most enjoyable movie sites.
sachaput 2 years ago
Glad to hear that attitude. For a lot of people, a flaw means something is ruined, but sometimes the good stuff can be so good that the flaws don't even begin to matter, ya know?
Any complaints I could find about Wolverine were all comparisons to the comic, nothing about the movie's actual quality, so I choose not to consider them flaws. They changed Deadpool, big deal, when X-Men 1 came out, ALL of the characters were changed.
DistantJ 2 years ago
Thats good criticism. A good reviewer should always judge the movie based on its own merits, not what was left out from the source material.
However some comic movies like Garfield end up changing the characters so much that they throw out everything that made the character appealing in the first place.
Superfreaxx 2 years ago
I quite liked Garfield. Seemed like the same character to me.
DistantJ 2 years ago
Good debate.
Tr3vorezn1k 2 years ago
I agree with fury. he mad better points which i agreed with.
I didnt like X-Men Origins.
I thought it was boring, not strong character development,plot holes and bad dialogue
scottishdumbass 2 years ago
Really well said, Fury, and motivational.... I really try to come from that insightful fan place you speak of; sometimes Gab or Dad get a little silly/harsh - but hopefully just in good fun! It's been educational to become part of and grow within the YouTube movie community, and hopefully G&D are evolving to the higher standard of which you speak. It really is about loving movies, and in a thoughtful and good-attitude way! Thanks so much for your example in this arena!
GabnDad 2 years ago
I thought that the arguments from both Fury and DistantJ were extremely equal in point!!
i might cry...
sinbysin666 2 years ago
Well, I didn't watch Wolverine. I am and have been as long as I can remember, a big fan of comics including Spider-Man, X-Men, DD, Superman, Etc... So I look forward to any movie release based on comics. Having not watched this particular one yet, I felt like I was being impartial while listening to the debate last night. But in the end, both brought out excellent points and it really sounded like it was just a matter of what you expected the movie to be like going into it.
Solarcoreg 2 years ago
@Solarcoreg cont'd:
I'd like to say that Fury got my vote because my opinion is very similar to his. But that wouldn't be fair. That makes me biased. I think that the point by DistantJ about it just being a pure bad ass action flick showing Wolverine doing what he does best is great and make me actually want to see the movie even after all the negative reviews I've read and listened to.
I apologize but I give Fury 25 pts vs 20 pts DistantJ for point #5 adamantium bullet.
Solarcoreg 2 years ago
Well said Fury! I really hope one day we can have that little debate on Ben Button that we started having on blogtv. What a great movie... or in your opinion a snoozefest.
Randcreviews 2 years ago
alright fury as always your on the mark.
greyfoxyo 2 years ago
I honestly thought you made the better points.
Invincible5972 2 years ago
your probably the last remnant of the youtube of 2006 Fury. Keep staying on the honorable path. oh yeah, say hi to the wife and kid for me ok.
jkf41197 2 years ago
like i said i loved the video
you should make way more of them :D
themovieguys101 2 years ago
you do a good job fury you hit the nail on the head 95% of the time with your vids to me the hole debate vid was a bit boring and a bit dry
theman1223 2 years ago
most debates are, have you seen the presidential candidates one ? total yawnfests heheheh
FuryoftheFilmFan 2 years ago
Fury, you're like wise the Master Jedi of Film Fans. You're the Mace Windu of the youtube Film Community. Glad to have you around good sir.
JeremyJahns 2 years ago 2
Well said fury! You realy take into account what kind of audiance and what level of deapth a movie brings. I don't realy or watch alot of reviews by mainstream critics, although I think Jonathon Ross is a realy good one personaly. Here in the UK, he hosts a show called "Film 2009 with Jonathon Ross" and he gives a very ballenced and detailed insite into the film. Dunno if you've heard of him or not, but you may like his reviews :).
Nightmare060 2 years ago
I quite like Jonathan Ross sometimes, but even he will consider flaws that really don't matter to be movie-breaking.
DistantJ 2 years ago 2
How can you be negative? You gave "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" a positive review. These people have no common sense. It's like we can't dislike on a certain film anymore without getting an personal attack.
CyberpunkCentral 2 years ago
That y i like you FotFF
DyslexicGamer 2 years ago
Agree here!
Always give a reason to why you say: This moive suck or why it was good.
danxtur 2 years ago
Calling someone something negative who has different opinions is pathetic. Keep making those videos man, you really deserve a lot of subscribers.
BlazikenMaster 2 years ago
I've been with you since the start, Fury, and I can honestly say that your style, wit and good movie knowledge have not once been compromised! You're better than any so called 'critic' in the real world.
Long Live Fury!
TheReviewKid 2 years ago
Have you been getting hate over this issue fury?
A hatred of an opinion is something I will never understand. People I'm subscribed too constantly have views opposing my own. I love Trick-R-Treat, you didn't. Mr.Black wasn't high on Spiderman 3, I was, you enjoyed Transformers 2, I hated it, but that doesn't mean that I should boil in anger and unsubscribe or go on an attack. That stuff is immature.
spidey2065 2 years ago 2
It's nothing new but I've noticed it get worse over the months. My goal is to build a community that brings together film fans. Spidey you are a prime example of someone who "gets it"
FuryoftheFilmFan 2 years ago
you should check out my site. It's for FAN NERDS of all walks of life, film, comics, games, sports, tv, fantasy and so on.
fanerdityflicks 2 years ago
ur not a whore like SXEPHIL wtih 230 different channels all to fucking make money!
fanerdityflicks 2 years ago
I will not sell T shirts.
FuryoftheFilmFan 2 years ago
First, as usual.
howdouwin 2 years ago