actually a nuclear exploation would never work in space due to the fact that there is no atoms, or anything for the nuclear bomb to react to, you would see a much differnt exploation then what you see now
@cliang001 LOL fail at atmoic knowledge. A Nulcear bomb carries its atomic fision atoms with it, I.e. the plutonium/uranium or various other radioactive substances. When the radioactive material reaches critical mass, by either imploding or firing, the atoms break apart, creating a chain reaction of atoms breaking apart. Enourmous energy is released in this process. A nuclear bomb does not break atoms apart outside of its inital bombshell to create a nuclear blast.
Guys, this is absolutely 100% real. It was part of a series of tests under Operation Fishbowl, a sub-operation under Operation Dominic, and this specific shot (test) is named Starfish Prime and was conducted on July 9, 1962. There's a whole wikipedia article on it.
EXPLOSION NOT IN SPACE. explosion in the sedimentary level of hydrogen. HYDROGEN BURNS BLUE. recognize science! It was a test. what were they testing? GLOBAL WARMING increasses evaporation. Water is h2o we are consuming oxygen more than ever befor. co2 is increasing because plants can't convert to oxygen fast enough. we are getting our oxygen from the water, and twice as much hydgren to our atmospher. lightest element settles highest. we live in a boom. test verified. PLANETARY HYNDENBURG SOON
@ROLNIKxPL Oh thin Prove me wrong. Number one you can't tell its space. or that its even a Nuke. it could be a Above ground test, or not even a nuke at all. Number two i'm pretty sure the UN. Ban the Armament of space? And any Nuclear testing in space? Plus the Info i have are from Nuclear Engineers. So unless you can out prove them, i still hold my option.
@Kuastoyn I'm saying that a nuke CAN work in space as it doesnt require air. A nuke doesnt 'burn'. Burning is a chemical reaction that involves oxygen, while a nuclear fusion (fission?) is completely different. Example: sun. Theres no air in the sun, yet it fuses hydrogen into helium in a nuclear reaction releasing energy. You also mentioned FAB. You are correct as the explosion does require oxygen for CHEMICAL reaction.
not in space.....official space limits are something like150 miles up. Allyou would see is the light given off in the reaction....no shock wave whatsoever
Yeah the dumb shits did blow up a couple of H-bombs in space back in the 60's and 70's...Thats why the aliens are here...They are pissed off about it and said NO MORE H-BOMBS DUMB WAD!...
It is fake because if that a Nuke did go off in space it would send a wall of Electromagnetic charged particles cascading towards the earth causing all electronics on that side of earth to short circuit. That would be dreadfully bad for the global economy and for all of the people on electronic life support machines. Neither of the two apoplectic circumstances have show fruition so the video is fake.
@ttopperr Its good to see someone payed attention in their science class. These morons don't even care, they are like "pretty lights". lol Besides there is a world wide nuclear treaty that bans nuclear detonations in space.
@YSoSreuss Yes I know and the out come I have previously stated why; nukes did serve there purpose now we have to for it and come together as a species.
I don’t know that vacuum tubes may be resistant to EMPs but it is internationally banned for any sovereign country to detonate an Atomic bomb in space. Stop trying to sound like you know thing when you really don't. It only embarrasses yourself and gives you the reflection of an ass.
@ttopperr Look in the mirror ass face, I know what of I speak.
Starfish prime (this explosion) July 9, 1962
Outer space treaty October 10, 1967,which not all countries have signed this,and if you think this will stop a country from using nukes in space you are so stupid and deluded that you might as well turn your brain in for a refund.
It is fake because if that a Nuke did go off in space it would send a wall of Electromagnetic charged particles cascading towards the earth causing all electronics on that side of earth to short circuit. That would be dreadfully bad for the global economy and for all of the people on electronic life support machines. Neither of the two apoplectic circumstances have show fruition so the video is fake. I you are the delutional one little boy.
@ttopperr My you are stupid and immature,can't accept the truth so you run back to your old comment and effectively plug your ears and go "I'm not listening" when I have proved you wrong.
If you ever grow up I will continue this conversation until then,go play with your toys.
I am not going to fight over the internet that, “it's internationally banned for any sovereign country to detonate an Atomic bomb in space”. I'll just restate that fact and you can make what ever mythical flights of fantasy you want to from this video and restate as the truth, but it will be free of truthful fact.
@ttopperr Ok I want you to look up starfish prime,it's effects,the discoveries it helped us find,and the average electronic tech and medical items that where used in the early 1960s.
Then and only then will I waste anymore of my time talking with you.
High-altitude means it was still on earth and had not crossed the boundary to be considered outer space. I might have not been completely clear on that I meant Outer space not High-altitude but, you being such a stickler on specifies IE High-altitude and other such tomfoolery. I was expecting you to know.
@xxxkingjoexxx It's not fake... it was many years ago, now atmospheric(and space) nuclear tests are banned. Search "high altitude nuclear explosion" in google.
@jonvalley14 what the crap are you on about? Normal bombs and nukes can go off in space fine.
Also in a completely unrelated matter I'm assuming its white light but it appears blue for the same reason that the sky is blue when the sun is shining. Is that correct?
@araozolivosestelam if it was from nukes we would have holes in our ozone not a all together thinning ozone thats what this one guy who cant remember tried t omake a 300mt bomb as a last line to open a hole in the ozone and kill EVERYONE not just a area
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are actually still unocccupied near within about 28 miles of where the bomb hit beacuse 90% of the fallout was still settled there , the weird thing is that the fat man and little boy were the name of the bombs and the litttle boy was bigger then the fatman bomb.
Eh...this is not as flashy as I hoped...that...and it's rather dangerous to launch something as volatile as a nuke into the ozone layer; I mean, if not destroy it with that, worry more about any leftover radiation leaking into the surrounding area below. X(
@BlackslayerX0 While i agree its not nearly as dangerous as detonating on the surface or in the atmosphere. Or in nevada. America dropped 2 bombs on Japan and 1,021 on Nevada. I guess it isn't surprising that St. George, Utah has more background radiation and unburned Plutonium than ground zero of both Nagasaki and Hiroshima. All I can say is "WTF?" Is anyone with me on this?
@KSxINFERNO There is a thing called solar wind. This nuke was detonated in the Earths atmosphere. It was not detonated in the near perfect vacuum of outer space.
@lilkonna there are hell lot of radioactive stuff inside everybody, have maybe heard of this thing called background radiation or radon gas? and im sure there are american and european satellites with radiavtive matter in them as well. it was the way to do it back in those days. we'll all get our portion of radiation but so what? it isn't so dangerous..we'll all get some kind of cancer (irregular or harmful gene mutation) in the end.
Plutonium or uranium, either i'm fuzzy on the subject. But yes, everything you've said is correct but surely a nuclear explosion from an atom bomb is potentially going to cause fallout across the globe?
@lilkonna actually I was referring to your comment about the satellite:D but anyways, you mean a nuclear explosion in the high atmosphere or just a nuclear explosion? i guess a nuclear bomb wouldn't cause much of a fallout, maybe if it was high in the atmosphere but the one for example in this video is much much higher, there is gonna be no fallout from it. a lot bigger problem is nuclear waste from powerplants, some countries just dumb it in a river or something.
Oh I see, must've read your response wrong. High atmosphere nuclear explosion will spread nuclear dust and other nasty stuff over a much larger area purely because of wind etc.
And yes I'm aware they do that, it's horrible to think of.
dear idiots at nasa and at the helm of the leading powers of the world! please stop blowing up any more nukes, you already are richer than shit and own this planet. thank you.
@masteryoyo1978 Yes, Instead of fire and a big explosion it would look more like plasma blowing up, so picture blue and purple exploding violently, but you wouldnt feel anything or hear anything i dont think.
@meatwadtodd correct space dose not allow the passing of soundwaves in the form of vibrations but you can capture reverberations and translate them in to an audio track look up sounds of space on youtube
@ovis63 No it wouldn't buddy. They obviously took precaussions and sent the missile device, H-Bomb, and or Nuklear missile whatever you wish to name the device. Again they would calculate a good enough distance before the device will implode. "a bomb of that sourt does not explode it implodes causing a more vicious and or catastroping implosion. Whether the divice was manually controlled with a remote detenatior or set to implode at a certain time or distance. the divices implosion is so--
catastrophic that the devices implosing was clearly visible from the cordinates it was to implode in the first place. Therefore allowing the human eye to visibly and clearly see the implosion from a safe enough distance, as well as it was a clear night and not cloudy, also providing the human eye to visible see the implosion
And by the way im only 14, so use common sense albert einstein smart ass little fagboi.
NASA wanted to send people to moon again and Chuck Norris volentired. This is footage of the shuttle exploding when it found out chuck norris was inside.
@PAP300 Nope. It's in space, which means no radioactive dust or ash. Nuclear weapons are much less powerful in space, as there is no blast, so they have to rely on heat, which drops off very quickly in space without a medium to transfer it, and radiation. And the ozone layer blocks out most radiation. I mean, we live around a nuclear fireball. If it didn't we'd all be dead. The only people that might be threatened would be those underneath the ozone hole, and even than it's just a mild sunburn.
Yes it has to be fake all the countries that have Nukes know that if a nuke goes off in space a shock wave eradicates in a sphere and once it hits the earth Ozone (O3) one of the outer electrons gets striped off and a chain reaction is set in motion that strips additional outer orbiting electrons from surrounding atoms witch in leads to a powerful electro pulse wave would short-out all inter wiring on all mother boards with in the blast zone SO HAPPY NEW YEAR as we all slip into the dark ages.
@ttopperr It's not fake... it was many years ago, now atmospheric(and space) nuclear tests are banned. Search "high altitude nuclear explosion" in google.
I also love how any tom dick and harry can claim to know so much about particle/ quantum physics. You can't just read wikipedia and know how to create a nuke or the effects of said nuke. There's a reason why people get paid so much to research it.
@alphade10 Actually I could create a gun type nuke pretty easily, if I had the nuclear material. It would be huge and inefficent but it would be a nuke. The only reason I can't is because you need uranium (which you can't buy on e-bay), a massive plant to enrich it, and a whole shitload of electricity to run the plant. But if you gave me the enriched uranium I could make it in my garage in a couple of weeks. You're talking about technology that's 70 years old.
@thieferic Go fuck yourself. But before you do check out the Little Boy design. It's widely known how it works. The guys that designed it obviously needed to be geniuses in their field (e.g. the Germans never got as far as knowing you need U235 for it). But once it was figured out, the design was quite simple. An implosion device, or a thermonuclear bomb takes insane precision/materials, but if you've got the uranium for it, an inefficient gun type atomic bomb is not hard.
To the random guy on youtube claiming he can make an atomic bomb if he had the proper amount of U-235 - ALERT: You are a fucking idiot. Please try to scale back the amount of DUMBASS before posting again. Sincerely - The Youtube Community.
@OlyEvo Go outside and look up on a clear day and you will see the biggest reactor in our solar system and best of all it's not shielded.
D8W2P4 3 months ago
holly fuck where do i get that type of firework
am794628 3 months ago
are we supposed to whack off on this?
23viktor23 3 months ago
get a dog in the middle of the explosion!!!
javier48883 4 months ago
GET THE WATER NIGGA!
AceMagestar 4 months ago
that's how the moon was created...... i think?
MrIsaacv23 4 months ago
lol, fail... the double explosion is a trick of the camera- it's actually the same explosion in reverse, as told by the lines on the camera lens.
pretty good for a fake.
oneevilchef 4 months ago
actually a nuclear exploation would never work in space due to the fact that there is no atoms, or anything for the nuclear bomb to react to, you would see a much differnt exploation then what you see now
cliang001 4 months ago
@cliang001 LOL fail at atmoic knowledge. A Nulcear bomb carries its atomic fision atoms with it, I.e. the plutonium/uranium or various other radioactive substances. When the radioactive material reaches critical mass, by either imploding or firing, the atoms break apart, creating a chain reaction of atoms breaking apart. Enourmous energy is released in this process. A nuclear bomb does not break atoms apart outside of its inital bombshell to create a nuclear blast.
bowtechber 4 months ago
@bowtechber You can call it a satellite killer or killer satellite it causes EMP which will short out satellites
spacepatrolman 3 months ago
prrrettty lights
gordvance97 4 months ago
infowars.com infowars.com infowars.com
infowars.com infowars.com infowars.com
resistance is victory
hehh666 5 months ago
@Kuastoyn wow dude... go back to highschool...
BoostStrykr 5 months ago
Guys, this is absolutely 100% real. It was part of a series of tests under Operation Fishbowl, a sub-operation under Operation Dominic, and this specific shot (test) is named Starfish Prime and was conducted on July 9, 1962. There's a whole wikipedia article on it.
seitengewehr98 5 months ago
if there were intellgent life in space,there isn't anymore.
burn19ballz 5 months ago
EXPLOSION NOT IN SPACE. explosion in the sedimentary level of hydrogen. HYDROGEN BURNS BLUE. recognize science! It was a test. what were they testing? GLOBAL WARMING increasses evaporation. Water is h2o we are consuming oxygen more than ever befor. co2 is increasing because plants can't convert to oxygen fast enough. we are getting our oxygen from the water, and twice as much hydgren to our atmospher. lightest element settles highest. we live in a boom. test verified. PLANETARY HYNDENBURG SOON
RRKJ34 6 months ago
This is stupid, a nuke can not work in space. Same reason a FAB won't work in space. no air
Kuastoyn 6 months ago
@Kuastoyn lol this isnt stupid, YOU are stupid
ROLNIKxPL 5 months ago
@ROLNIKxPL Oh thin Prove me wrong. Number one you can't tell its space. or that its even a Nuke. it could be a Above ground test, or not even a nuke at all. Number two i'm pretty sure the UN. Ban the Armament of space? And any Nuclear testing in space? Plus the Info i have are from Nuclear Engineers. So unless you can out prove them, i still hold my option.
Kuastoyn 5 months ago
@Kuastoyn I'm saying that a nuke CAN work in space as it doesnt require air. A nuke doesnt 'burn'. Burning is a chemical reaction that involves oxygen, while a nuclear fusion (fission?) is completely different. Example: sun. Theres no air in the sun, yet it fuses hydrogen into helium in a nuclear reaction releasing energy. You also mentioned FAB. You are correct as the explosion does require oxygen for CHEMICAL reaction.
ROLNIKxPL 5 months ago
@Kuastoyn Look up Starfish prime (this explosion) you simpleton.
D8W2P4 3 months ago
was that ligit in space??
sneakySniper74 6 months ago
happy nuke year
IFROGET 6 months ago
imagine the tsar bomb in space
digimaster88 7 months ago
god jizzed
chronicrabbi 7 months ago
is there a ay 2 test these hings without blowing them up?
steeltoelion 7 months ago
h mmmmmmmm interesting
mskiUSMC 7 months ago
and there is the hole in the ozone that we've been worrying about
kevinstevens407101 7 months ago 7
thats legit
Manu112345 8 months ago
who knew nuukes were so majestic ( think i spelled that wrong)
Blackfire1700 8 months ago
"insert Russian voice-over E.M.P. here"
decoded11 8 months ago
Ah Operation Fishbowl, shot Checkmate...twas a good one!
marmaladekamikaze 8 months ago
not in space.....official space limits are something like150 miles up. Allyou would see is the light given off in the reaction....no shock wave whatsoever
StargateMunky 8 months ago
Comment removed
jun930power 9 months ago
@unlikeanyotherhuman I have a message from The Universe addressed to you.
The Universe:
For you, the day Mankind did those things was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Tuesday.
D8W2P4 9 months ago 6
i think they blew up some ufo's that were flaying around
kingofdice66 9 months ago
It would suck if one of those accidently blew up to early.
MrBeReal45 9 months ago
EMP ELECTRONICS ARE DOWN!
ATeamAnglers 10 months ago
They Should have a Nuclear Firework.
Kevin215ful 10 months ago
@270787felipe looks kinda like snoopy
PalMundo90 10 months ago
what about the EMP after effect
philips484 10 months ago
@MegaMnguyen
You have obviously never heard of starfish prime then have you???
wishihadaname94 10 months ago
wow you no how much radiation is pouring pack down 2 earth
verbic96 11 months ago
@verbic96 Yeah, none.
hateschools 9 months ago
now THATS A FIREWORK!!!
nickster2230 11 months ago
emp all electronics are down!
tadanorm 11 months ago
accidentaly hits the moon "FFFUUCCCKKKK!!!" lol
Austinq1998 11 months ago
isnt. EMP?
odi22865 11 months ago
So what exactly does this clip purport to show?
wsxvgy 1 year ago
@wsxvgy it shows nothing other then pretty lights.
ttopperr 1 year ago
HAHA fake shit
rax7 1 year ago
Yeah the dumb shits did blow up a couple of H-bombs in space back in the 60's and 70's...Thats why the aliens are here...They are pissed off about it and said NO MORE H-BOMBS DUMB WAD!...
SpincterManBubba 1 year ago
It is fake because if that a Nuke did go off in space it would send a wall of Electromagnetic charged particles cascading towards the earth causing all electronics on that side of earth to short circuit. That would be dreadfully bad for the global economy and for all of the people on electronic life support machines. Neither of the two apoplectic circumstances have show fruition so the video is fake.
ttopperr 1 year ago
@ttopperr Its good to see someone payed attention in their science class. These morons don't even care, they are like "pretty lights". lol Besides there is a world wide nuclear treaty that bans nuclear detonations in space.
YSoSreuss 1 year ago
@YSoSreuss Yes I know and the out come I have previously stated why; nukes did serve there purpose now we have to for it and come together as a species.
ttopperr 1 year ago
@ttopperr thats why they send it out the atmosphere?
Mrrightfuldeath 1 year ago
@Mrrightfuldeath
You really need to know what you words mean before you use them. Atmosphere is only the gas that surrounds an object.
ttopperr 11 months ago
@ttopperr You where asleep in history class I see,this was done many years ago in the era of vacuum tubes which are very resistant to emps.
D8W2P4 3 months ago
@D8W2P4
I don’t know that vacuum tubes may be resistant to EMPs but it is internationally banned for any sovereign country to detonate an Atomic bomb in space. Stop trying to sound like you know thing when you really don't. It only embarrasses yourself and gives you the reflection of an ass.
ttopperr 3 months ago
@ttopperr Look in the mirror ass face, I know what of I speak.
Starfish prime (this explosion) July 9, 1962
Outer space treaty October 10, 1967,which not all countries have signed this,and if you think this will stop a country from using nukes in space you are so stupid and deluded that you might as well turn your brain in for a refund.
D8W2P4 3 months ago
@D8W2P4
It is fake because if that a Nuke did go off in space it would send a wall of Electromagnetic charged particles cascading towards the earth causing all electronics on that side of earth to short circuit. That would be dreadfully bad for the global economy and for all of the people on electronic life support machines. Neither of the two apoplectic circumstances have show fruition so the video is fake. I you are the delutional one little boy.
ttopperr 3 months ago
@ttopperr My you are stupid and immature,can't accept the truth so you run back to your old comment and effectively plug your ears and go "I'm not listening" when I have proved you wrong.
If you ever grow up I will continue this conversation until then,go play with your toys.
D8W2P4 3 months ago
I am not going to fight over the internet that, “it's internationally banned for any sovereign country to detonate an Atomic bomb in space”. I'll just restate that fact and you can make what ever mythical flights of fantasy you want to from this video and restate as the truth, but it will be free of truthful fact.
ttopperr 3 months ago
@ttopperr Ok I want you to look up starfish prime,it's effects,the discoveries it helped us find,and the average electronic tech and medical items that where used in the early 1960s.
Then and only then will I waste anymore of my time talking with you.
D8W2P4 3 months ago
@D8W2P4
High-altitude means it was still on earth and had not crossed the boundary to be considered outer space. I might have not been completely clear on that I meant Outer space not High-altitude but, you being such a stickler on specifies IE High-altitude and other such tomfoolery. I was expecting you to know.
ttopperr 3 months ago
Nukes cant go off in space.... no oxygen for explosion....
jonvalley14 1 year ago
@jonvalley14 yeah, so this is either fake, or not a nuke
xxxkingjoexxx 1 year ago
@xxxkingjoexxx It's not fake... it was many years ago, now atmospheric(and space) nuclear tests are banned. Search "high altitude nuclear explosion" in google.
jmotto 1 year ago
@jonvalley14 Nukes don't need oxygen to explode! Of course there isn't a fireball, but the energy released in various ways is still formidable.
jmotto 1 year ago
@jonvalley14 what the crap are you on about? Normal bombs and nukes can go off in space fine.
Also in a completely unrelated matter I'm assuming its white light but it appears blue for the same reason that the sky is blue when the sun is shining. Is that correct?
Teh1337bix 11 months ago
@Teh1337bix SOME normal bombs still work. only those that carry their own oxidizer.
and as far as nukes go, it's the same thing, since they often rely on conventional explosives to compress the fuel past criticality.
zagyr 11 months ago
this is the reason why birds are falling from the sky....
obite99 1 year ago
Wow, Think if you can buy it and then it fall on the ground... You are screwd!
Mrhappy9901 1 year ago
Thank god this one wasn´t "Made in China"
TheDoFDoEProject 1 year ago
where da fuck did ya get that footage,
also NUCLEAR EXPLOSION IN SPACE IS DA BOMB :D <3
omarfaw 1 year ago
YAY...LETS DO IT AGAIN FOR 2011!!!!
xy274 1 year ago
It looks a bit like deathstar exploding in star wars movie viewed from ground
SkyyCaptainn 1 year ago
Gee i wonder why we have a hole in the ozone? CFC's my ass!
emailmemrstara 1 year ago
what if the rocket tipped over lmao
ADIOHAWK1 1 year ago
may be or may be not, but in fact man destroy the enviroment and himself
araozolivosestelam 1 year ago
after that , is it true the ozone has problem because the gases we drop? or just a lie? look what they 've done with nuclear test!
araozolivosestelam 1 year ago
@araozolivosestelam if it was from nukes we would have holes in our ozone not a all together thinning ozone thats what this one guy who cant remember tried t omake a 300mt bomb as a last line to open a hole in the ozone and kill EVERYONE not just a area
waddupdudes 1 year ago
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are actually still unocccupied near within about 28 miles of where the bomb hit beacuse 90% of the fallout was still settled there , the weird thing is that the fat man and little boy were the name of the bombs and the litttle boy was bigger then the fatman bomb.
EnclaveRobloxTV 1 year ago
@EnclaveRobloxTV fat man are 21 kt and little boy 15 kt
manoloacbe 1 year ago
wer sowas hat und braucht hat kein schwanz in der hose!!!!
matisyahu777 1 year ago
someone's 25 killstreak just failed miserably.
Mrrightfuldeath 1 year ago 84
hahahahaahahahaa so true
654steven 1 year ago
@Mrrightfuldeath nuke NOOOO bu-OMG WEVE BEEN EMPED!!!!!!!!! HOLY SHIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!
greendayfanman01 8 months ago
@Mrrightfuldeath OMG YOU MADE ME FUCKING DIE LAUGHING LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO
FUNSHIZ 6 months ago
@Mrrightfuldeath HAHAHAHA
ZSedlacek 6 months ago
They were just after the EMP
ZSedlacek 6 months ago
@Mrrightfuldeath fag
USAmilitarypower 5 months ago
For I have become shiva, destroyer of worlds!
xMASHHEADx 1 year ago
not a nuke then they all should been dead
jacobpaulzzon 1 year ago
@ 0:25 hey look its snoopy!
RezViper 1 year ago
what song is this?
sean8251 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cancer all over the place...
Rzrjo 1 year ago
black hole :o
ps no homo
jojojoey98 1 year ago 35
very beatiful :)
destroyed14MCfly 1 year ago
i guess space isnt empty , looks like some kind of fluid :D
r1ddler1 1 year ago
Eh...this is not as flashy as I hoped...that...and it's rather dangerous to launch something as volatile as a nuke into the ozone layer; I mean, if not destroy it with that, worry more about any leftover radiation leaking into the surrounding area below. X(
BlackslayerX0 1 year ago
@BlackslayerX0 While i agree its not nearly as dangerous as detonating on the surface or in the atmosphere. Or in nevada. America dropped 2 bombs on Japan and 1,021 on Nevada. I guess it isn't surprising that St. George, Utah has more background radiation and unburned Plutonium than ground zero of both Nagasaki and Hiroshima. All I can say is "WTF?" Is anyone with me on this?
IsaacSloan 1 year ago 2
@IsaacSloan Yup what the fuck is right...
Its disturbing and sickening what the governments of the world do to their own citizens, citizens who trust them only to be turned into guinea pigs.
Residents throughout many parts of Utah were exposed to radiation levels 1200 times above acceptable levels from fallout.
While isotopes like strontium 90 have decade away, others like plutonium and ceasium ect still linger around killing and maiming.
Even digging holes stirs it all up again.
firearmskeepyoufree 1 year ago
@firearmskeepyoufree
Except for the "fatman" dropped on Japan in WW2... the entire city is rebuilt around ground zero still and people are thriving just fine.
The pollution issue is false, made up to try to deter nuclear arms.
TAMYCRON 1 year ago
@TAMYCRON Well, littleboy and fatman were baby bombs .. 200kt ... what about actual MEGATON bombs?
kaltmacherde 1 year ago
@kaltmacherde
Yea, they're pretty cool too!
TAMYCRON 1 year ago
@TAMYCRON They were puny; designed to cause large explosions more than anything.. it's like comparing a firework with an incendiary bomb.
Udany147 1 year ago
@Udany147
Yeah, for 'totes.
TAMYCRON 1 year ago
WOW
gyeonwoo031 1 year ago
So much for fucking up the atmosphere XD
coolyaid 1 year ago
*burp* Woops lol
xXMONEYWORLDXx 1 year ago
Did anyone else notice how the centre of the explosion doesn't actually come from the rocket?
unbrokenjack 1 year ago
DONT USE AEROSOL CANS THEY RUIN THE OZONE LAYER!!!!! (but you can go ahead and fire nukes into space)
dontworrybehappy6 1 year ago 2
@dontworrybehappy6 rofl XD THUMBS UP!
zedmlftw1023 1 year ago
It was a Chuck Norris' fart...
contedracula70 1 year ago 2
@contedracula70 NO his mom of course
asdasd8609 1 year ago
oooh pretty
manishy1 1 year ago
$Holy shit luke blew up the death star... again!¢
RATTTHEPUNK 1 year ago
likonna ur a dip shit theres no wind in space u mong.i think u trying to be smart failed
KSxINFERNO 1 year ago
@KSxINFERNO There is a thing called solar wind. This nuke was detonated in the Earths atmosphere. It was not detonated in the near perfect vacuum of outer space.
Jemalacane 1 year ago
Some one know the song? :P
Or speciall made just for this video?
xenrayz 1 year ago
It's funny because the UN has approved using nuclear weapons in space, but only if a massive meteor / asteroid was about to hit.
Nuclear fallout would be assured and the earths atmosphere will never be the same again once something like that has detonated above it.
Look at that russian satellite that crashed into earth. Filled with plutonium and just falls out of the sky and spreads radiation globally.
Because of that EVERYONE alive now has some amount of plutonium inside of them.
lilkonna 1 year ago
@lilkonna there are hell lot of radioactive stuff inside everybody, have maybe heard of this thing called background radiation or radon gas? and im sure there are american and european satellites with radiavtive matter in them as well. it was the way to do it back in those days. we'll all get our portion of radiation but so what? it isn't so dangerous..we'll all get some kind of cancer (irregular or harmful gene mutation) in the end.
000Nebula000 1 year ago
@lilkonna oh and by the way, none of us have got plutonium inside them, unless they've gone and eaten it.
000Nebula000 1 year ago
@000Nebula000
Plutonium or uranium, either i'm fuzzy on the subject. But yes, everything you've said is correct but surely a nuclear explosion from an atom bomb is potentially going to cause fallout across the globe?
lilkonna 1 year ago
@lilkonna actually I was referring to your comment about the satellite:D but anyways, you mean a nuclear explosion in the high atmosphere or just a nuclear explosion? i guess a nuclear bomb wouldn't cause much of a fallout, maybe if it was high in the atmosphere but the one for example in this video is much much higher, there is gonna be no fallout from it. a lot bigger problem is nuclear waste from powerplants, some countries just dumb it in a river or something.
000Nebula000 1 year ago
@000Nebula000
Oh I see, must've read your response wrong. High atmosphere nuclear explosion will spread nuclear dust and other nasty stuff over a much larger area purely because of wind etc.
And yes I'm aware they do that, it's horrible to think of.
lilkonna 1 year ago
@lilkonna
right, high atmosphere - bad, space - guess you'll only upset the martians and stuffDD
000Nebula000 1 year ago
I think it would've been funny if the rocket had like malfunctioned and like blew up china or something
gibsongitars 1 year ago
dear idiots at nasa and at the helm of the leading powers of the world! please stop blowing up any more nukes, you already are richer than shit and own this planet. thank you.
frostwow 1 year ago
@frostwow they never did
selearemus 1 year ago
would this bomb react differently in space, being as there is no air or gravity.
masteryoyo1978 1 year ago
@masteryoyo1978 Yes, Instead of fire and a big explosion it would look more like plasma blowing up, so picture blue and purple exploding violently, but you wouldnt feel anything or hear anything i dont think.
meatwadtodd 1 year ago
@meatwadtodd correct space dose not allow the passing of soundwaves in the form of vibrations but you can capture reverberations and translate them in to an audio track look up sounds of space on youtube
judgeofcrap 1 year ago
@masteryoyo1978 The heat wave would make a roast potato out of you :D
ovis63 1 year ago
@ovis63 No it wouldn't buddy. They obviously took precaussions and sent the missile device, H-Bomb, and or Nuklear missile whatever you wish to name the device. Again they would calculate a good enough distance before the device will implode. "a bomb of that sourt does not explode it implodes causing a more vicious and or catastroping implosion. Whether the divice was manually controlled with a remote detenatior or set to implode at a certain time or distance. the divices implosion is so--
x732brickchamp 1 year ago
catastrophic that the devices implosing was clearly visible from the cordinates it was to implode in the first place. Therefore allowing the human eye to visibly and clearly see the implosion from a safe enough distance, as well as it was a clear night and not cloudy, also providing the human eye to visible see the implosion
And by the way im only 14, so use common sense albert einstein smart ass little fagboi.
x732brickchamp 1 year ago
@x732brickchamp You're only 14? Yeah, the line "albert einstein smart ass little fagboi" told me as much. He was joking.
Th3Hamm3r 1 year ago
@Th3Hamm3r I was also joking, lol. I was bored with nothing too do.
x732brickchamp 1 year ago
@masteryoyo1978 good question someone asnwer that i wanna no that too lol.
x732brickchamp 1 year ago
NASA wanted to send people to moon again and Chuck Norris volentired. This is footage of the shuttle exploding when it found out chuck norris was inside.
stickmanpwner64 1 year ago
@stickmanpwner64 Thats exactly the educated answer I expected from someone on youtube
Collector2006 1 year ago
@stickmanpwner64 Thats not even funny
Dionkeyundead 1 year ago
made in china.
070erwin 1 year ago
EXPENSIVE firecracker.
laikros 1 year ago
Who blows nukes in space??? It destroys the ozone layer!!!
Alerukio 1 year ago
WE'VE BEEN E.M.P'ED ELECTRONICS ARE DOWN!!!!!!!!! :OOOO
sh1tsweak1 1 year ago
@sh1tsweak1 LOL SO TRUE
halo3pro917 1 year ago
@halo3pro917 hehe <3 hope you enjoyed my comment
sh1tsweak1 1 year ago
Anyone else see the dog? It's trying to tell you soemthing>_<
Jamalje 1 year ago
now those are fireworks!
Fredfredbug4 1 year ago
Nuke the entire site from orbit.... its the only way to be sure.
combineoverwatchc13 1 year ago
Collector2006, on a small scale you are almost right right, but EVERYTHING is effected by gravity. Light bends due to gravity.
chainhit 1 year ago
Wait, did the smoke spell out "fuck you, environment?"
staticfive 1 year ago
Globale Warming
sasuke00malfuction 1 year ago
Wouldnt the remnants of the nuclear explosion fall back down into the atmosphere?
PAP300 1 year ago
@PAP300 Nope. It's in space, which means no radioactive dust or ash. Nuclear weapons are much less powerful in space, as there is no blast, so they have to rely on heat, which drops off very quickly in space without a medium to transfer it, and radiation. And the ozone layer blocks out most radiation. I mean, we live around a nuclear fireball. If it didn't we'd all be dead. The only people that might be threatened would be those underneath the ozone hole, and even than it's just a mild sunburn.
halo07guy2 1 year ago
@halo07guy2 Oh, well thanks for the information on that! I was totally wrong on that one lol
PAP300 1 year ago
Yes it has to be fake all the countries that have Nukes know that if a nuke goes off in space a shock wave eradicates in a sphere and once it hits the earth Ozone (O3) one of the outer electrons gets striped off and a chain reaction is set in motion that strips additional outer orbiting electrons from surrounding atoms witch in leads to a powerful electro pulse wave would short-out all inter wiring on all mother boards with in the blast zone SO HAPPY NEW YEAR as we all slip into the dark ages.
ttopperr 1 year ago
@ttopperr It's not fake... it was many years ago, now atmospheric(and space) nuclear tests are banned. Search "high altitude nuclear explosion" in google.
jmotto 1 year ago
it didn't look like it made it to space when it blew...
Ombrenuit 1 year ago
i dont see a dog i see some freaking 4 leged dinosaur wit arms O.O
warriorfar9 1 year ago
i dont know somebody please tell meeeee
destroycamero 1 year ago
did they die it looks like it blew up
destroycamero 1 year ago
TACTICAL NUKE INCOMING!!
trondy89 1 year ago
@trondy89 Cpl Dunn:Holy SHITT EEEMMMPPPP!!!!!!!
uLookLikeANoob 1 year ago
@uLookLikeANoob haha
AdolfHitler343 1 year ago
u can see like a dog in the background... at :31
u can see like the outline
romeprince11 1 year ago
that's how to kill allot of Martians
freddykisback123 1 year ago
hmmm...that explains where the ozone holes came from.
tribexa 1 year ago
Wow! Big firework! Crud, RADIATION!
youngeagle14 1 year ago
Can someone explain what the 'second' explosion is ?
tonkafloss 1 year ago
EMP! Electronics are down!
rlacy93 1 year ago
"Goodbye Harry"
rprince418 1 year ago
@mageknight3x its called space dummy not in the atomoshpere
fivehouse 1 year ago
I also love how any tom dick and harry can claim to know so much about particle/ quantum physics. You can't just read wikipedia and know how to create a nuke or the effects of said nuke. There's a reason why people get paid so much to research it.
alphade10 1 year ago
@alphade10 Actually I could create a gun type nuke pretty easily, if I had the nuclear material. It would be huge and inefficent but it would be a nuke. The only reason I can't is because you need uranium (which you can't buy on e-bay), a massive plant to enrich it, and a whole shitload of electricity to run the plant. But if you gave me the enriched uranium I could make it in my garage in a couple of weeks. You're talking about technology that's 70 years old.
fookfocketyfookfook 1 year ago
@fookfocketyfookfook
shut up, seriously just shut up
thieferic 1 year ago
@thieferic Go fuck yourself. But before you do check out the Little Boy design. It's widely known how it works. The guys that designed it obviously needed to be geniuses in their field (e.g. the Germans never got as far as knowing you need U235 for it). But once it was figured out, the design was quite simple. An implosion device, or a thermonuclear bomb takes insane precision/materials, but if you've got the uranium for it, an inefficient gun type atomic bomb is not hard.
fookfocketyfookfook 1 year ago
@fookfocketyfookfook
To the random guy on youtube claiming he can make an atomic bomb if he had the proper amount of U-235 - ALERT: You are a fucking idiot. Please try to scale back the amount of DUMBASS before posting again. Sincerely - The Youtube Community.
thieferic 1 year ago