Added: 3 years ago
From: MissleLaunch
Views: 2,149
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Damn when did Wookiee start talking, I did not see them talk in Star Wars? Is your cousin Sobecka on this video too?

    LOL!

  • Have a look at Quasicrystals. Alienscientist (search for his channel) has some good info about harnessing energy in this way.

  • what kept us from implementing this technology sooner is that no one can control who hooks up to the grid and not.

    YOU LOOSE CONTROL

    by the way, many major universities have done the test and found to be up to 1000% efficient. you might say free energy...

    any ways, it is not free. many blood has to flow till the energy companies "allow" this. that is why you find so few info about it, and the calculations have to do it yrself.

    MissleLaunch, the question is good, but don't make it rhetorical.

  • (I am way too damn quick, with this.)

    Perhaps I need to put a disclaimer onto the video, stating that I don't really know jack about what I'm talking about? ;)

    My proposed inefficiency-check (lining rooms with wave-reflectors), implemented on a small-scale, could still benefit power-companies. So what if you've got free energy, for 10 yards out, if you open a window? I doubt the powers that be care that much. Besides, the government could just work electricity into the peoples' taxes.

  • the fact is, by using this tech, you wont get free energy from the power companies. for yr receptor to work you must know the resonance frequency of the company's transmitter, witch could be modified via a parallel digital control system. or even modify the waveform.

    i know i am overriding my previous post (done more research). using tesla's ideas opens the door to another, not necessary free, but extremely cheap energy. that means less charge, and less commissions and less money

  • @encodion 1000%? kinda throws the law of conservation out the window. as for being on/off the grid, every house has a meter that is read, wireless or not I don't see why this would be a valid point any more.

  • You know absoutly nothing about anything to do with electricity and power sources please stop pretending that you know what your talking about. You can't even grasp the simple concepts that Tesla proved around 100 years ago and your trying to explang how "simple" of an idea wireless energy transfer is. It's not simple in any way shape or form, take a class read a book learn something before you pretend to be an expert on somthing that you dont understand.

  • Whoah-ho nelly! You're a little too serious, buddy! ^_^

    Care to enlighten me on what I'm overlooking? I'm willing to learn.

    Insofar as I had understood things, at the time of this video, AM/FM-radios are built on the same technology Tesla conceived: to use the ame type of signal to power appliances, one just needed to über-charge the broadcast (wildly inefficient [without elaborate work-arounds], I know ^^;;).

    I'm, uh, sorry I offended ya?

  • get a hair cut, and trim the beard. Then, read some literature about RFID's.

  • I did the first two things a few weeks back, so bleh. :P I'll look into RFIDs, and make a follow-up video... if I can be buggered to do so.

  • i see what you mean. I'm no expert on the matter but the only reason i could think of as to what could have kept them from implementing this technology sooner is probably that it wasn't efficient. It probably required more energy to emit the frequency than could have been recieved. Again, i could be wrong but im sure wavelengths lose strength over distance. Although this technology could be useful for something such as an ionocraft ;)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more