cchj768 Actually, many of those "rebel MPs" and their constituents DID have the guts and intelligence, and DID do their part to guide Britain. As much polish as Churchill gets, he was still just one man alongside his cabinet, parliament, military and entire fellow citizenry. He did what he did but, mostly, he just was where he was.
roylee,sad to say,but 50 yrs wont do,we will never know when would the world realize what kind of world we have now...
the world may never had a chance to know how to solve such heavy problems that our world has now,as long as the power remains in the hands of +++++...
i prefer no longer point,but just state a belief,explain and point out no more hatred...
Wartime politics in a democracy/republic are always facinating.
The re-election of Lincoln in 1864 and Roosevelt 100 years later were other 'votes of confidence'.
Naturally people will always disagree with their leaders, and 20/20 hindsight is always a dangerous preoccupation in historiography, but it almost seems inevitable that these leaders would remain in office.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Look at how the EU corrupts everything is touches. The English were once one of the greatest warrior peoples the white race has ever produced. Now the UK is little more than a pathetic rabble of leftists of different types. And this is no put-down of the still brave British Army. 50 years from now historians are going to look back and say: "that Soviet Union was bad but the European Union was/is even worse."
Pathetic how they voted no confidence in Churchill's leadership. Not one of them would have the guts or the intelligence to lead Britain through the worst crisis it had ever faced.
Only 25 voted No Confidence. Anyway, is it not a great thing that democracy was alive and (quite) well in Britain in 1942? Can you imagine a vote of no confidence in Htiler or Mussolini at that time?!
@cchj768 well,it's just a safety method,noone wanna wind up like chamberlaine...
and so far churchill had did his best and proved much better than chamberlaine...
i'm no fan of churchill,but only someone that has a true neverdie spirit,who are very very rare,could take the worst condition into better condition...
being a leader,specially on the wost condition isn't easy task...
cchj768 Actually, many of those "rebel MPs" and their constituents DID have the guts and intelligence, and DID do their part to guide Britain. As much polish as Churchill gets, he was still just one man alongside his cabinet, parliament, military and entire fellow citizenry. He did what he did but, mostly, he just was where he was.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
At about 2:00 - world's first reductio ad Hitlerum.
0NoName9 1 year ago
Cripps and other British Stalinists were twits.
RobGoth100 1 year ago
teslagod2003 are you on drugs?
66peacelove 1 year ago
roylee,sad to say,but 50 yrs wont do,we will never know when would the world realize what kind of world we have now...
the world may never had a chance to know how to solve such heavy problems that our world has now,as long as the power remains in the hands of +++++...
i prefer no longer point,but just state a belief,explain and point out no more hatred...
teslagod2003 1 year ago
:46 Oh no... of course not. Stalin would never ever interfere with the internal affairs of another country. lol
Ahh... Poland? Perhaps Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania? Hmmmmm.
the82spartans 1 year ago 2
Wartime politics in a democracy/republic are always facinating.
The re-election of Lincoln in 1864 and Roosevelt 100 years later were other 'votes of confidence'.
Naturally people will always disagree with their leaders, and 20/20 hindsight is always a dangerous preoccupation in historiography, but it almost seems inevitable that these leaders would remain in office.
"Changing the horse in midstream" and all that.
QPhilms 2 years ago
BLACK MARKET IS BEING STOPPED LOL
UKCALLING99 2 years ago
I like 10:06 when the politician awkwardly reclines onto the desk.
denisebrunette 2 years ago 2
ha ha, yes
askjiir 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Brittain allied herself with the Axis power Soviet Union.
Should have stayed away and waited for Americans to join.
graniitti1 2 years ago
roylee you sound like hitler! - dirty fascist!
falmouth4386 2 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why are facist considered dirty actually they were very clean at least they tried to clean up europe and not leave it in a red shadow
woolvett22 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Look at how the EU corrupts everything is touches. The English were once one of the greatest warrior peoples the white race has ever produced. Now the UK is little more than a pathetic rabble of leftists of different types. And this is no put-down of the still brave British Army. 50 years from now historians are going to look back and say: "that Soviet Union was bad but the European Union was/is even worse."
roylee13 2 years ago
Do You have any idea what you're talking about?
chrismiw 2 years ago 6
You suck really bad. You have very low IQ
askjiir 2 years ago
Pathetic how they voted no confidence in Churchill's leadership. Not one of them would have the guts or the intelligence to lead Britain through the worst crisis it had ever faced.
cchj768 3 years ago 13
Only 25 voted No Confidence. Anyway, is it not a great thing that democracy was alive and (quite) well in Britain in 1942? Can you imagine a vote of no confidence in Htiler or Mussolini at that time?!
pix042 2 years ago
@cchj768 well,it's just a safety method,noone wanna wind up like chamberlaine...
and so far churchill had did his best and proved much better than chamberlaine...
i'm no fan of churchill,but only someone that has a true neverdie spirit,who are very very rare,could take the worst condition into better condition...
being a leader,specially on the wost condition isn't easy task...
teslagod2003 1 year ago