Added: 9 months ago
From: OnlyWaxing
Views: 9,746
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (106)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Bill Maher is so astute.

  • If a republican messed with my voting laws, then I have permission to kick their ass!

  • Spot on as usual! Bill Maher pegged them for exactly what they are.

  • Bill Maher...now there's a guy with no class. Everyone Google "Bill Maher" and "Crocodile Hunter" and you will see a picture of this goofy bastard dressed as Steve Irwin at a Halloween party shortly after he had died.

  • Africa for the Africans,Asia for the Asians,white countries for EVERYBODY!

    "Anti-racists" are everything they accuse us of being and far more.

    Targeting a race everywhere on the planet for extinction is what any sane person would define as hard core racism. No one has ever attempted what "anti-racists" (ha ha) are doing to whites.

    GeNOcide on a GLOBAL SCALE, in the name of "anti-racism"???

    Sick joke?

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  • Do you agree with this statement:

    "Genocide involves the attempt to achieve the disappearance of a group by whatever means. It does not have to be violent, it could be a combination of policies that would lead to a certain group dying out."

    Malcolm Fraser (Prime Minister of Australia 1975-1983)?

    Do you also agree that non-white immigrants demographically replace whites when they are invited into white countries by the Establishment and it`s supporters?

  • @dungeoncrawler55 oooooh yeah, poor whites being replaced demographically. let's compare that to what the whites did to the Native Americans and black people. you're right. it's genocide all around.

  • @MsDDiddy

    Are you forgetting about the Trans-Saharan slave trade,Arab Imperialism,African atrocities etc,etc?

    Hey,the Mongols were a bit naughty 700 years ago so lets flood Mongolia with tens of millions of non-Mongolians and try and force-blend them out of existence as a fitting punishment eh?

    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

  • @dungeoncrawler55 arab imperialism? don't get me started on european imperialism. get over it you paranoid little fuck. minorities are all over the world, especially in america and no amount of bitching from you is going to change that. either live with it or move to fucking antarctica.

  • Yes repuplicans are all of those.

  • ASIANS FOR THE ASIANS

    AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS

    WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY???

    THAT IS WHITE GENOCIDE PURE AND SIMPLE and if you are advocating this then you are guilty of the most virulent anti-Whitism.

  • @chromeagle

    "That's a dressed up word used by scared-shitless white republicans who don't like change."

    The "change" you speak of means fewer and fewer white people does`nt it?

    Why should white people just passively accept this deliberate demographic elimination(GENOCIDE) you anti-whites are foisting on them?

    Who gave you the moral authority to "OK" white genocide,you anti-white weasel?

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  • @dungeoncrawler55 like i said "scared shitless"

  • @dungeoncrawler55 no, the "change" means a shifting demographic (not less white people, more non-white people, there's a difference) of blacks, latinos, middle-easterners, gays ect in this country. its not white peoples fault thats happening. its called a changing of the guard. anti-racist cant be anti-white because then that mean that pro-racist is pro-white. i dont think white people are racists and i certainly hope u arent.

  • @chromeagle

    "no, the "change" means a shifting demographic (not less white people,"

    You dirty anti-white liar.You are trying to claim that the rapidly increasing numbers of non-whites inside white countries have absolutely no impact on the numbers of white people in existence?

    huffingtonpostDOTcom/2011/04/0­6/racial-generation-gap-census­-analysis_n_845276.html

    “Were it not for Hispanics, the nation’s child population would have declined,” the report's authors wrote.

    It`s genocide.

  • @dungeoncrawler55 GENOCIDE? OMG, GENOCIDE? WTF, how in the hell did u arrive 2 the conclusion that b/c more foreigners are coming to america, white people are disappearing, and worse, that it's GENOCIDE! That is the most unintelligent, far-fetched thing I've ever heard. The decline in whites in this country is not the result of hispanics. Where on Earth are these Whites going? No, it's the fact that, something else Maher pointed out on another video, that because its Hispanics "fuck more".

  • @chromeagle

    But you support the replacement of white people with no-whites don`t you?

    Anyone who does`nt support that is called a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionje­ws and you don`t want to be called one of them do you?

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  • @dungeoncrawler55 where are you from the south?? is your sister the mother of your children you idiotic hick trash??

    this is the saddest country in the world and you are the contributing factor

  • @dungeoncrawler55 so when the english slaughtered the native americans HINCE THE WORD NATIVE was that GENOCIDE?????

  • @dungeoncrawler55 and if killing whites means killing racism then so be it

  • @dungeoncrawler55 this is the problem with u racist idiots. u treat the ever changing world as a threat to ur way of life. yes, there is a color shift in this country, but if ur so scared of something that will bring no harm to whites, what the hell are u gonna do about it? can u tell me that?

  • Comment removed

  • Every respectable person now knows that the term "Diversity" and "Multiculturalism" are nothing more than a codewords for White Genocide by racial assimilation. Anyone who advocates these concepts and policies is absolutely guitly of massive Anti-Whitism and complicity in genocide of White people. No self respecting White person should ever tolerate anyone demanding these vile demands for White Gencide in the guise of words like 'Diversity" and "Multiculturalsim."

  • Questions for anti-white Bill:

    Do you agree that If Saddam Hussein had flooded the Kurdish villages with non-kurds and ordered the Kurds to "assimilate" and "celebrate this diversity" and thereby demographically wiping out the Kurds as an ethnic group he WOULD have been GUILTY of committing an intentional act of genocide?

    Isn`t that what you anti-whites are doing to white people by flooding our communities with non-whites and telling us we have to "assimilate" and "celebrate diversity"?

  • Africa for the Africans,Asia for the Asians,white countries for EVERYBODY!

    "Genocide involves the attempt to achieve the disappearance of a group by whatever means. It does not have to be violent, it could be a combination of policies that would lead to a certain group dying out."

    Malcolm Fraser (Prime Minister of Australia 1975-1983)

    Bill Maher is white genocide supporting filth.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  • Doesn't this anti-white Maher have a problem with Muhammad being the most popular baby name in London, England, because supposedly he loves western culture? So if these africans & middle easterners converted to atheism and named their baby boys Horatio then it's no problem right? The disappearance of white people doesn't matter and the "name magic" of Great Britain will advance western civilization despite the fact all brown countries are 3rd world countries. It is white-genocide.

  • In his horribly biased anti-White opinion White Republicans are racist, but he is just saying that because they are WHITE. Everybody knows that the term "anti-racist' is nothing more than a vicious codeword for ANTI-WHITE. White people anywhere do not have to tolerate such vile attitudes which are clearly informed by an unbelievably virulent ANTI-WHITISM such as that unfortunately and unashamedly displayed by this angry anti-White Bill Maher and anachronisms like him.

  • @Formulaone21 So... your implication, then, is that Bill Maher, whose fans and supporters are majority-white, who is famous primarily because of a majority white audience, and who is rich because of a majority white audience...is "anti-white". Care to explain that one a little further?

  • At least a Mercury is an American car.

  • Democrats were against desegregation... The KKK were all democrats... NO ONE CAN DISPUTE THIS FACT.. History has a way of getting in the way, doesn't it?

  • democrats elect presidents on the account of race. they are the real racists here, who believe racial advocacy is mandatory (oh unless you're white of course).

    Bill must be getting money from some well funded democrat for being so god damned biased and "keith olberman-like" lately.

  • @lictor313 you sound so ignorant and stupid

  • @chromeagle "ignorant" .... such a by-word used by leftwing drones... "dat beez igna-ant"... instead of hit and running why don't you show me through A and B what is "ignorant" in my statement?

    coward

  • @lictor313 A) "dat beez igna-ant" what the hell does that even mean? B) You accused dems of electing presidentS (I uppercased the S just to show that you're generalizing). How do they elect presidents based on their color. 43 of them were white. Not much color to sift through huh. The only racist here is the one trying to accuse dems of playing the race card to get votes (YOU). It's not about race it's about the issues.

  • @chromeagle The democrats have been using the race card to whoop up enthusiasm in their voting ranks since the civil rights age! Don't even pretend. And of course, like the dishonest coward that you are, you willfully misrepresent what I wrote: I said that that democrats are racists in that their voting is very much dictated by racial considerations- not that they elect black presidents! If a candidate is for amnesty, for affirmative action, or benefits some racial enclave in ANY WAY: they vote

  • @lictor313 But this all misses the point of Bill Maher and filthy Anti-Whites like him. They always advocate programs and policies which are in the end geared toward the diminution of White people and the pursuit of White Genocide.They need and will be brought to tribunals for treason at some point in the near future this much is sure.

  • @Formulaone21 I should certainly hope so... but looking at average white america today... its very hard to see backbone or dignity in any of them....

    america is a nation bent for suicide.. America in 2030 will look more like a cross between mexico, sub saharan africa and Brazil...

    the time to act is very limited. and i'm afraid white people are too divided and lack in manhood

  • @lictor313 I hear your frustration. The people who run Greater Angloshpere--including US--have run an ethnic conflict model against their own White founding gene pool; They have indoctrinated many of our own White people to demand and pursue policies which are thoroughly Anti-White. In fact, anti-racist is a codeword for ANTI-WHITE. You need to listen to Follow the White Rabbit Radio as it deals with White issues from this perspective. Just Follow the White Rabbit Radio by Horus the Avenger.

  • @lictor313 first of all, im not a coward. u wanna see a coward, go look in the mirror. secondly, ur saying that dems dictate their votes by racial considerations. blacks don't just vote for dems just because. JFK, a dem, fought for civil rights and his vp lyndon johnson passed the civil rights act and the voting act. clinton was called the "nations first black president" for his upbringing.

  • @lictor313 there are too many different people in america now, too many different cultures. and the democrats appeal to those people because pretty soon they will be the majority. thats not racism, thats strategy. and it's republicans who like keeping the country in the 1950s where minorities had no rights, whites had all the rights, everyone was married and christian, and socialists where our biggest enemy. but that era is 60 years old, stop trying to bring it back.

  • @lictor313 dems win these votes because they are politically correct. republicans pass laws that are against affirmative action, an important policy that helps blacks get ahead so they arent stuck in a gutter. and they'll cut taxes for education so blacks cant get the necessary knowledge to succeed in the global market. and they'll slander welfare that poor blacks need for basic survival. so yea, the vote dem. but not b/c of race. they vote dem b/c the gop is against them.

  • @chromeagle loooL! what laws specifically did the republicans pass that curved or even slowed down affirmative action type policies? On the contrary, under BUsh, affirmative action and racial quotas greatly increased, under such nonsense schemes as "the no child left behind act" and the disastrous minority home loaning schemes of the past decade. Under bush the growth of tax burdens and expenditure on set aside programs of minorities doubled. what you say is nonsense on stilts.

  • @lictor313 BTW, "racial advocacy" isn't mandatory. That's a dressed up word used by scared-shitless white republicans who don't like change. And of course there's no "racial advocacy" for white people because white people don't need to advocate for people that are already white. Embrace a new world instead of living under a rock.

  • @lictor313 Actually, chromeagle's right: you're pretty ignorant. You said: "democrats elect presidents on the account of race." Why, then, has only been one non-white President in the history of this country? Even if what you're saying is true -- and it isn't -- the majority of democrats and republicans have historically both been white. Or did you have another point beyond this nonsense about reverse racism?

  • @lictor313 Actually, chromeagle's right: you're pretty ignorant. You said: "democrats elect presidents on the account of race." Why, then, has only been one non-white President in the history of this country? Even if what you're saying is true -- and it isn't -- the majority of democrats and republicans have historically both been white. Or did you have another point beyond this nonsense about reverse racism?

  • @spideymayne of course my argument that "democrats elect on the account of race" isn't a historical one... any one with half a brain could have deduced that I was refering to the recent cultural revolution and consequent birth of political correctness. My argument holds true for only about 30-40 years. And my argument doesn't depend on the election of a black president either, democrats have had racially motivated policies since the civil rights era (affirmative action happened without an Obama

  • @lictor313 I don't think anybody with half a brain would be attempting to make your argument in the first place. You can't put a birthdate on political correctness any more than you can prove how one majority white party has more non-white interests over the other. There were white -Republican- abolitionists and a white -Republican- President that ultimately put The Emancipation Proclamation into effect. And you do realize civil rights are about more than racial interests, right?

  • @spideymayne you certainly can put a birthday on modern political correctness ... it's called the civil rights era... And to prove my point... can you tell me if either party actually has WHITE RACIAL ADVOCACY policies? i'd be astonished if you could show me that. The 60's cultural revolution were inspired by amrcuse and cultural marxism... you do realize that right?

  • @lictor313 rofl. First you make a sweeping general statement that states, verbatim, "democrats elect on the account of race". Now it's "modern" political correctness we're talking about. How many times do you need to revise your context? Second, why would I need to show you white racial advocacy policies when my whole point was that neither party's interests were ever specifically racially motivated? (Notice it's "civil rights" and not "the political correctness era")

  • @spideymayne democrats do elect on the account of race, if their policies for the past 40 years have been deeply entrenched in racial politics and that the bearing of a given racial... there was precisely zero revision of my previous statement- you deformed it, so I added refinements. Your implications earlier were that the republican party were somhoe the pro-white racist party... I asked for you to account for this... to no avail.

  • @lictor313 Deformed it? I quoted you directly. It's sitting right at the top. Second, at no point did I imply that anyone was racist besides you. Third, explain to me how I'm implying that Republicans are a "pro-white racist party" (for reference, quotation marks are for direct quotes) when I pointed out to you that they have a history of abolition. Try using direct quotes of something I've said. With quotation marks. =]

  • @lictor313 To answer your question, though, most advocacy policies (like, say, affirmative action) benefit whites just as much as persons of color; just not explicitly. Why do you think they're passed in the first place?

    One other question: why do you keep bringing up political correctness like it's a bad thing? Do you have something against cultural diversity? Do you have a problem with a socially or culturally-disadvantaged person asking to be treated with respect?

  • @spideymayne that's a hilarious statement... a racial preference policy that denies better qualified whites and excludes people on account of their race... is "good for them".... I wish I had the gall to make the same argument for Jim Crow laws... I have no problem with "cultural diversity" not sure I understand what you mean by that. and you got it all wrong... affiramtive action is not about respect at all... its about getting unequal treatment on account of your race... freeloader nonsense

  • @lictor313 Regarding affirmative action: there is a widely-acknowledged wage gap between African-Americans (AAs) and whites. An employer could hire an AA male with a degree for virtually the same rate as a less-qualified white male for the same amount. Hiring a greater amount of people of color lends credence to any business, which looks good on paper when applying for various types of funding or grants.

    Now tell me how I'm making any of this up.

    (Hint: I'm implying that you're an idiot.)

  • @lictor313 Anyways, you still haven't proven to me that "democrats elect presidents on the account of race". You're saying this began around the civil rights era, correct? Great. School me, professor. I'm going to give you one last chance to prove to me that civil rights are about racial preference and not -social equality-. Let me guess: I bet white men also don't benefit from, say, women having the right to vote, right? Good luck wrapping your brain around that one. LOL. 

  • So just because I'm a republican that means I'm racist? That's like saying that all Muslims are terrorists or that all Americans are fat, some are but not all of them are. Also people of many races voted for republicans and are members of the republican party, please figure out that the belief or actions of the minority of a group doesn't mean the entire group is like that.

  • His face and smile always say the same: "damn, i am so clever!". This guy is nuts

  • Lol this dude is so right! Fucking hateful, corrupt, bible thumping, rich, pieces of shit republicans. (now now lets not group all republicans under this light). Your right, not all their members are rich, they manage to take in some of our poor...the poor dumb enough to believe this party gives a flying fuck about anyone who has to actually work for a living.

  • WOW... And I thought he was just some ugly son of a bitch with a face only a mother could love. Now I know he's a stupid dick hole too!

  • Hey look its the tolerant & peace loving Bill Maher doing what he does best, being intolerant and trying to incite more hate between Republicans and Democrats. Good job trolling Bill.

  • @BigDeebow66 We've been letting you neocon girls hog all the hate for years. After what you done to the country, you deserve a lot more hate than we've even got...

  • @masercot Well woes is me. :( Lets all feel sorry for the dems. If you would of actually read my comment, I didn't insult Democrats I insulted Bill Maher. He preaches like he is tolerant & peace loving, yet he says stupid shit like this that make him look like a giant freaking hypocrite. It's stupid idiots like yourself that follow assholes like Maher that make the World a worse place than it all ready is. One more thing, I'm not conservative, so stop generalizing you dumb ass.

  • @BigDeebow66 Please, tell me: When, since the beginning of time, has Bill Maher stated that he is tolerant? Why do democrats have to "tolerate" you idiot neocons and your racism?

  • @masercot First of all, stop calling me a neocon. I'm not conservative. I'm far from it. Second of all, you got me. I have never heard Bill Maher say he was tolerant, but I will say he loves to point out that the republican party is intolerant, racist, greedy, and how they are going to destroy the world. Yet he never calls himself on all the hate he is spewing out of his pie hole. He is a hypocrite.

    Also, how are the republicans & conservatives racist? Because they don't like Obama?

  • @BigDeebow66 Obviously, you are a Republican, son. Or, you wouldn't whine, "How are Republicans racist?"...

    They offer and pass laws that make it hard for Blacks to vote...laws that all but specify illegal HISPANIC immigrants for prosecution...every election they send out some kind of flier in minority neighborhoods to make the occupants afraid to vote...recently, one candidate wanted a return to the "poll test" and another was against the Civil Rights act... I've got more...

  • @masercot no please, by all means, SAY MORE!

  • @masercot Knew a white in communist party who abt voting said "We can vote in a dictatorship or anything we want." ---by inciting violence in various populations (black is only one), propaganda t.v. campaigns, they could "get" vote 2 put in group to control country's money (so the end game is radical welfare state with all money held by a handful in government), so r others wrong to try to stop it? If blacks, hispanics are main target of cp, will they B happy with end game?

  • @westchesterny If you have no proof of any of what you are babbling, you are wasting my and your time, son. Your logic sounds a lot like that used by the Nazis against the Jews: Make up a pretend crime...then PREVENT IT...

    Try your stupidity on some without a highschool education, child...

  • @masercot Also, obviously intimidation cuts many ways. Many generational white americans do not vote, as they feel they have no voice in government. ---A statistical fact. The poster asked whether Maher is Anti-white, though. You seem to say "yes, he is anti-white." BUT he is justified in being anti-white. This anti-white rhetoric is necessary b/c whites, (as if they are all the same and think alike, which they don't) are evil. So he is anti-white and this is necessary.

  • @masercot ..... I've still not figured out how it is that the person who says that black people don't need a handicap to get ahead is racist..... unless, you know, your retarded... and no shit, their are plenty of racist Republicans, yet you ignore the fact the same is true of Democrats, gun laws that make it more difficult for blacks to get concealed weapons permits, laws that assume a black man can't get ahead without a handicap; a proposed law that will force many Latinos into the military...

  • ... so that poor brown kids can be sent overseas to kill or get killed by other poor brown kids for benifit of the pocket books of the Rothchilds and Rockefellers.....

  • @BillMaherBigNose Looks like you're the pitiful one, what with a troll account on YouTube,

  • Talk about being prejudiced! Saying ALL (every member) of a particular group has these traits? Isn’t it Liberals who are always saying you have to look at people as individuals?

    What about the African-Americans who are Republicans? (Oh, right. They’ve either sold out or are “Uncle Toms” because African-Americans can’t have their own opinions!)

    Who is the real racist here?

  • Talk about being prejudiced! Saying ALL (every member) of a particular group has these traits? Isn’t it Liberals who are always saying you have to look at people as individuals?

    What about the African-Americans who are Republicans? (Oh, right. They’ve either sold out or are “Uncle Toms” because African-Americans can’t have their own opinions!)

    Who is the real racist here?

  • im a racist, paranoid, and greedy apparently. riiite, next time this guys gets obama's dick out of his mouth to talk someone should shut the cameras off.

  • Google 'Mercury Hot Rod images'...

    And 30% of Americans will ALWAYS use words like ALWAYS. Idiot.

  • @BillMaherBigNose There's no such thing as a happy liberal. They're almost all unhappy.... and dirty.... and smelly... and often hairy in places which should have no hair.

  • @zombies8u Yes, that must be why Jon Stewart is always laughing, Glen Beck is always crying, and Michael Savage is always yelling.

  • @BillMaherBigNose no no no, you wanna see unhappy men, look at the consurvatives.

  • You need to add corruption to the list. There is little conservatism to be seen in the GOP these days. The party has been taken over by corrupt, greedy, bigots. Gone is the idea of self-reliance and an entrepreneurial spirit. What is left in its place is avarice and odium and a philosophy that says: corruption or immorality made into law are, from that moment forward, no longer corrupt nor immoral. I miss Republicans.

  • @ginesdepasamonte Calling everybody he dislikes a racist, blaming the wealthy for everything, and saying that America needs a class war, is sooo reasonable... Maher is full of hatred. I miss moderates

  • @xaviqaz You seem to be caught on the wrong end of the dynamic here. He seems to dislike them because they are racists, not call them racists because he dislikes them. Your dependence upon absolutes like «everybody» and «everything» would also seem to dilute the potency of your observation. Finally, I think you should cut him a bit of slack concerning hatred. After all, it does mean that he is willing to speak to the other side in their own idiom. Haters should expect hate in return.

  • @ginesdepasamonte You accuse me of dependence upon absolutes and you come up with "the other side". Maher uses Limbaugh, Beck, Palin and a few others to make general assertions against conservatives and right-wingers. These people talk about each other all the time because they are their own mirror image. So sick of them. They contribute nothing to improve the country. They are full time partisan doctrinaires. Maher is not a comedian. Jon Stewart is a comedian

  • @xaviqaz «...the other side...» is the closest you can come to producing an absolute in my post? OMG! You have become a cliché. So you hate Bill Maher because he hates too much... WTH! He uses the ground rules set down by his adversaries; they shouldn't bitch when he smacks them down with their own game plan.

  • SO cute watching all the imbeciles who are under the hallucination that they're "conservatives" lose their shit because a black dude once again proved he's better than anybody they've got.

  • @ScinLaeca358 only good communist is a DEAD communist

  • Bill Maher is a turd.

  • "Everything is politics" was also expressed as "The personal is the politcal"....i.e. the individual only exists insofar as they support the State. See "Liberal Fascism" by J. Goldberg, a nice historically oriented book.

  • @USA4July1776 And recommending books by Jonah Goldberg....HAHA! No wonder you're such a retard.

  • Racist douche, Bill Maher takes it in the brown eye.

  • These egalitarians believe that everyone should be equal, side be side, in the rice fields!

  • @BernardASU2009 What the fuck does that even mean? As opposed to the Republican Utopia where it's Alan Greenspan and 300 million serfs?

  • Obama and his crowd are descendants of the 1960's ethos that "everything is politics." This is the mentality that has moved us away from Constitutionally small government into the realm where government interferes with the smallest areas of our lives. Obama is a perpetual campaigner, not a leader. His idea of governing is forcing people to do what he thinks is right, irrespective of the legality of the process by which he achieves his ends.

    I hope our Republic can make it until November '12.

  • @USA4July1776 Obama got bin Laden, Mr "July 4 1776." All your people can do is bleat about immigrants and hand welfare to billionaires. So I understand why you have such a hard time coping with reality - you're a groupie for the wrong team.

  • @USA4July1776 "I hope our Republic can make it until November '12". I hope there is a decent, electable Rep/Conservative candidate by Nov '12. One thing I can say that the dems did well in 07/08, is run a good campaign. At least they should have with the 'community organizer' in chief in charge...if a professional community organizer couldn't run a good campaign, then he would have been a TOTAL looser.

  • @USA4July1776 we will even if "we the people" have to water the tree of liberty

  • Yes, really.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more