Kodak had this bad habit of making cameras smaller instead of bigger. They went from 120 roll film which had huge negatives, to 127 which was smaller, to 126 which was even smaller (but still similar size to35mm) to 110 which was way too small and finally to disc which was so tiny the negatives were useless. they finally wised up and started to promote 35mm. my snapshots of the 60's still look great. Nearly every pic I've seen from the 70s and early 80's look bad because of the tiny film.
My older sister had one of those things for years. I never thought the picrues were very good but they were easy to carry around which made it convenient. I bet she still has it sitting in a cupboard.
My mother had one too, she kept that old thing for years, then finally I found it out in the garage and we decided that it was high time to donate to charity, so it went to Goodwill Industries...
I had a disc camera. It was my first camera... and it was amazing!! Till I one day went to develop my film and they wouldn't do it :( That camera worked hard and, like my digi now, it slipped so easily into my pocket. Ah.... memories... Thanks for sharing this!
take another picture without knowing me and you'll be coughing up camera flashes for weeks
Carlosiscool2 2 months ago
i found 1 in my basement !!!im 14 soooooo,ALSOME!!!
jigsaw5597 5 months ago
I still have my old Kodak Disc 3600 camera. My very first camera.
starbase121 7 months ago
Kodak had this bad habit of making cameras smaller instead of bigger. They went from 120 roll film which had huge negatives, to 127 which was smaller, to 126 which was even smaller (but still similar size to35mm) to 110 which was way too small and finally to disc which was so tiny the negatives were useless. they finally wised up and started to promote 35mm. my snapshots of the 60's still look great. Nearly every pic I've seen from the 70s and early 80's look bad because of the tiny film.
patrick9648 10 months ago
Urk, I had one of these things as my first camera when I was little. Even as a five year old I thought the pictures it took were awful.
Silanda 1 year ago
i had one
jennyjames11able 1 year ago
Hahahaha! That thing was the equivalent of a 0.1 megapixel digital!
HangoverMS 1 year ago
I had that same disc camera back in 1983'.. My mom lost it!!! :(
SuperRich1970 1 year ago
the pictures was fine if you just bought 3 inch photos, but i wouldnt think itd produce larger prints very well!
Dreambro1 1 year ago
wow. i really hate this kid
TigerTaint 1 year ago
@TigerTaint I hate his face.
DebrisStorm 1 year ago
"I just took two pictures of the cameraman, and I don't even know him"
WHAT??!!
That's really weird.
RevengeCreature 1 year ago
well isnt that cute
blueorchid1100 2 years ago
I guess this is what it would have been like if Kodak hired Doogie Howser's best friend to do a commercial.
GhostIntoTheFog 2 years ago
lmfao
moonshinevessel 2 years ago
I love the Kodak Disc Camera(s).
Nokorola 2 years ago 2
out of sync?!
djoutlaws 3 years ago
My older sister had one of those things for years. I never thought the picrues were very good but they were easy to carry around which made it convenient. I bet she still has it sitting in a cupboard.
grumpybb 4 years ago
My mother had one too, she kept that old thing for years, then finally I found it out in the garage and we decided that it was high time to donate to charity, so it went to Goodwill Industries...
LeoBurns728 3 years ago
I had a disc camera. It was my first camera... and it was amazing!! Till I one day went to develop my film and they wouldn't do it :( That camera worked hard and, like my digi now, it slipped so easily into my pocket. Ah.... memories... Thanks for sharing this!
Tintalasia 5 years ago
Ha ha.... I remember wishing I had a Disc camera when I was a kid because they seemed more "modern" and cool than my Instamatic.
Glad I didn't, because you only got 15 photos and the picture quality was lousy (tiny negs...)
Kind of like the APS of its day, but even more short-lived and less successful.
NotATube 5 years ago 5