This is actually an air crash, ya should know that. The A320 was doing a low pass with the scheduled altitude of 100 feet, but the plane went down to 30 feet due to instrumental failure.
The map of this airport which was given to the pilot before didn't show the forest over there, that's why pilot couldnt avoid crushing. Pilots did just what they were programmed.
This wasn't a bad landing or even an attempted landing. It was an attempted fly-by for the press and other people on the ground. The new fly-by-wire and computer system thought the pilots were trying to land and would not let them go-around. The computer continued to try to land the plane as it had been programmed to. Needless to say, the software was re-written after this incident.
This was a tradgic accident. Over 100 people died in it. It was also the first public flying of the a320. The pilots had programmed it to pull up later. Their maps did not show the large forest. It didnt have time to pull up
@natsplit Every plane today is not fly by wire, and fly by wire does not correct pilot inputs. Fly by wire makes everything easier to control as at high speeds the ailerons and elevators have shifted positions ever so slightly which can affect the airflow over the wings surfaces. And only airbuses like this one, are fly by wire, the Boeing 727, 737, 747 and 777 are not fly by wire.
No, there were three deaths among around 100 people on board. Youtube comments, especially on aviation related videos, have to be the most retarded bunch of fucking crackers in the world..
On Sunday June 26, 1988, the airclub at the airfield of Mulhouse-Habsheim in Alsace/France had organized with Air France a low approach of a brand new Airbus A320 in landing configuration. Michel Asseline was the pilot in command of F-GFKC, Pierre Mazière was his first officer. 3 passengers died in the accident and about 50 were injured. Search as Flight AF296
Didn't take the time to read through many comments...but most are very f**king wrong. The computer/FWB/whatever you want to call it performed flawlessly. The pilot was supposed to perform the fly-by higher. He was attempting to demonstrate alpha-floor (stall protection.) However, that protection goes away in direct control law (basic control mode that allows landing), which is active below 200' agl (I think.) By the time he realized the plane wasn't going to recover on its own, it was too late.
Haha, the most informed comment in here, and people probably will say you made up the term alpha floor. COMPUTERS AND CYBORGS ARE FLYIN!>!!:??!?!?!?!! OH NO
Also known as "NINTENDO-JET"!! lol! a french pilot told me that even his 12 year son could fly it... what hapenned here is 100% pilot responsability...otherwise, it's a greqt plane...
This was a test, not an airshow, in which Aibus was going to show the public its A320.
What happens is that Airbus gave an oppurtunity to the "public" to go onbord the plane.
What happened is that the FBW system of the aircraft failed during the fly-by making the pilot unable to climb, it was a software error, not pilot error.
Airbus was also very irresponsible to allow passenger during a tast flight.
Actually, it wasn't. It was a fly-by at an airshow, with full crew and even passengers on board. 130 passengers, six crew. Three passengers died, and the cause was determined to be pilot error. You can look up the facts yourself by searching for 'Air France 296'. In fact, the one and ONLY reason some people keep saying the plane was 'unmanned' is this very 24-second video, and the poorly researched and plain wrong comment in it. So no, not unmanned. Unfortunately.
If you knew anything about aviation you would know that planes are flown by computer today.
There is a system on modern planes called Fly-by-Wire which controls the aircraft, when the pilot moves the stick, a signal is sent throught the FBW to a central computer which then accepts or rejects the pilot control input, if it accepts the input the the hidraulic are moved and thus the aircraft can be flown.
@raderrader3911 LMAO F-117 cant have fly by wire as it is too old and it wasnt even around back then, and it wouldnt need it as it flies too slow AND furthermore EVERY SINGLE AIRBUS AIRCRAFT HAS FLY BY WIRE
I like how everybody on here has different views on what happened in the video :) If you listen to what the man says, it was "the first fully automated plane". Computer, not pilot, computer. Also, according to the title and description it was both a takeoff AND a landing. Frankly it looked like neither to me :)
This was at the paris airshow. The plane was being flown by air france's star A320 pilot. He was supposed to be showing what the airbus could do. The report said he couldnt see the trees cause of the angle of the aircraft. The engines get choked by the trees and couldnt power up.
The plane was taking off and 3 crews were killed. Subsequent investigation have found that the pilots might have been horseplaying and failed to ascend.
This is actually an air crash, ya should know that. The A320 was doing a low pass with the scheduled altitude of 100 feet, but the plane went down to 30 feet due to instrumental failure.
JeremyB787 5 months ago
he was doing an airshow flyby, got it wrong don't believe me? look at this type in air crash investigation pilot vs. plane
360GamerJP 6 months ago
Comment removed
360GamerJP 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BAD LANDING?! ITS A CRASH!!! CHANGE THE TITLE!
CriscitoZhao 7 months ago
how come the title says bad landing, and the description says bad takeoff?
I've flown lots of sims and I doubt most pilots would trust a computer at low altitude. Not with a plane. Chopper maybe.
kozmon0t 8 months ago
The map of this airport which was given to the pilot before didn't show the forest over there, that's why pilot couldnt avoid crushing. Pilots did just what they were programmed.
R.I.P. victims.
greata7x 8 months ago
i have seen this footage on aircraft crash investigation,it was a real crash with many lives lost
damiano776 10 months ago
@damiano776
not many lives but 2 lives lost,
pilotdynan 9 months ago
Som call it landing, I'd call it a crash...
Bluesbrothe 11 months ago
This wasn't a bad landing or even an attempted landing. It was an attempted fly-by for the press and other people on the ground. The new fly-by-wire and computer system thought the pilots were trying to land and would not let them go-around. The computer continued to try to land the plane as it had been programmed to. Needless to say, the software was re-written after this incident.
deputy1952 1 year ago
You see that the landing did not understand how or accident.
mine74 1 year ago
BAD LANDING?! ITS A CRASH!!! CHANGE THE TITLE!
jessecruzu 1 year ago
This was a tradgic accident. Over 100 people died in it. It was also the first public flying of the a320. The pilots had programmed it to pull up later. Their maps did not show the large forest. It didnt have time to pull up
squawstar 1 year ago
@squawstar
there were 2 lives lost, the rest got out, but anyway it was a tragic accident
pilotdynan 9 months ago
this isn't bas takeoff ! This is a missed landing and 3 people died in this crash !
pilotedeligne25 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I want to be flown by a computer... not!
undelete84 1 year ago
I want to be flown by a computer... not!
undelete84 1 year ago
Need your tree trimmed or cut down? Call Air France. We'll take care of all your pruning needs!
germanchocolate1982 1 year ago
and i wonder why global warming is getting worse?
jokinen1582 2 years ago
ops aircraft manufactures just caused another forest fire
chris5812341234 2 years ago 6
WEINIE-ROAST!!!
tracyterry 2 years ago
was a computer really flying that plane???
dml5583 2 years ago 2
no, this video is bullshit.
it was the first FLY BY WIRE plane. (means a computer is correting the pilot inputs)
every plane today is fly by wire.
but the plane didn't crashed bcuz of the computer, the pilots forgot to enable an anti-stall system
natsplit 2 years ago
@natsplit Every plane today is not fly by wire, and fly by wire does not correct pilot inputs. Fly by wire makes everything easier to control as at high speeds the ailerons and elevators have shifted positions ever so slightly which can affect the airflow over the wings surfaces. And only airbuses like this one, are fly by wire, the Boeing 727, 737, 747 and 777 are not fly by wire.
slaneyboi 1 year ago
@dml5583 it was they were testing new planes that were flown by computers...thats why they still use people
MrEthan0329 2 years ago
@dml5583 yes it was... there was no person inside
HDMGDH 1 year ago
Comment removed
soaringmonkey96 2 years ago
only 3 people died
B767rules 2 years ago
Comment removed
sympik 2 years ago
bääm voll in wald
bääm full in the woods
thyson412 2 years ago
oh my god !!! what happen with that plane ?
G4nt3ng22 2 years ago
uh, it crashed...
Smalls9090 2 years ago 3
it wasn't landing. they were showing off the new plane and the pilot was too low and couldn't pull up quick enough.
jon09593 2 years ago
IS NOT A BAD LANDING!
is an error in the cpu of the airplane, the pilot was land with autopilot, and this is an accident caused from cpu.
it was a test flight!
trucesav 3 years ago
In case you didn't notice, it CRASHED. In plowed into a bunch of trees, and fucking exploded. There was a big mushroom cloud and no survivors.
So, yeah, it was a BAD fucking landing (even though it was meant to be a takeoff).
HugelyBig 2 years ago
Actually only a few people died, even though it does look like a major crash. The plane was ruined (obviously.)
DominoFaz 2 years ago
Only a few people died because only a few people were in the plane. It was an airshow.
HugelyBig 2 years ago
@trucesav It was an airshow, and it was a take-off.
slaneyboi 1 year ago
Bad landing? I thought it happened at takeoff
escaperoute2 3 years ago
it wasnt a computer, there ware 3 cabin crew member inside of it, it was for a show in france
RIP
ludo0077 3 years ago
You're right. I remember that airshow.
GriffieRex 2 years ago
Except that they didn't die....
padizzle 2 years ago
Yes they did.
HugelyBig 2 years ago
No, there were three deaths among around 100 people on board. Youtube comments, especially on aviation related videos, have to be the most retarded bunch of fucking crackers in the world..
padizzle 2 years ago
And if you'd look beyond youtube you'd know that this was, in fact, during an airshow and that there were only 3 people aboard.
HugelyBig 2 years ago
@padizzle true that
MrEthan0329 2 years ago
This aircraft went on to being the safest in the world! There was nothing wrong with the aircraft. It was pilot error. 90% of all crashes are
mgiannelis 3 years ago
uh i think it missed the runway. lol
SoonersFan19 3 years ago
well that was a failure
hairesonyourchest 3 years ago
this is auto landing system test gone wrong
segajin 3 years ago
Microsoft flight simulator, you disappoint me. xD
SoClosex 3 years ago
If Computers Ever Come To Flying Planes Ill Never Get On One Again Id Trust A Human Way More Then A Poxy Chip
sexylauren123 3 years ago 3
i agree with u..
DirtyThing20 3 years ago
i third this
digiwolff 3 years ago
so do i
derekli04 3 years ago
ya totaly
pedroanumber123 3 years ago
the description sais bad take off but the title says bad landing
ImNoTeMoJuStNeRdY 3 years ago
On Sunday June 26, 1988, the airclub at the airfield of Mulhouse-Habsheim in Alsace/France had organized with Air France a low approach of a brand new Airbus A320 in landing configuration. Michel Asseline was the pilot in command of F-GFKC, Pierre Mazière was his first officer. 3 passengers died in the accident and about 50 were injured. Search as Flight AF296
jrcostarica 3 years ago
Am i right that this was a test at a French airshow?
There wasn't anyone on this flight was there.....hopefully not!!!
AyDavey21 3 years ago
I was going to buy a nice little cottage in the forest...
a1mint 3 years ago
YOU SEE HOW CRAP WINDOWS VISTA IS? lol
now that was an expensive crash, are companies still testing this idea?
Tomtheflyboy 3 years ago 10
They should have gone with Ubuntu. :P
popaddict 3 years ago
@Tomtheflyboy actually yes, they were lol. Otherwise fly-by-wire wouldn't exist today :D
Plamen2007 1 year ago
roflmao
Cr4zyD4n93 3 years ago
Didn't take the time to read through many comments...but most are very f**king wrong. The computer/FWB/whatever you want to call it performed flawlessly. The pilot was supposed to perform the fly-by higher. He was attempting to demonstrate alpha-floor (stall protection.) However, that protection goes away in direct control law (basic control mode that allows landing), which is active below 200' agl (I think.) By the time he realized the plane wasn't going to recover on its own, it was too late.
cag0034 3 years ago
Haha, the most informed comment in here, and people probably will say you made up the term alpha floor. COMPUTERS AND CYBORGS ARE FLYIN!>!!:??!?!?!?!! OH NO
padizzle 2 years ago
what i heard about this vedio is,,,it was a test flight with no passenger BUT its real
dolly76sa 4 years ago
is that real?
HIFKhockey90 4 years ago
yes crash d' Habsheim
666Vredesbyrd 3 years ago
Also known as "NINTENDO-JET"!! lol! a french pilot told me that even his 12 year son could fly it... what hapenned here is 100% pilot responsability...otherwise, it's a greqt plane...
Moumou727 4 years ago
oh no oh no lol
mbzfolife 4 years ago
ha ha ha ha
Obpd 4 years ago
OMG this is funny
seanliamreid 4 years ago
GG computers ! u rock ! i would love that computer to fly Bush's plane :))
Shockate 4 years ago
oh no oh no lol !
Duky1994 4 years ago
This was a test, not an airshow, in which Aibus was going to show the public its A320.
What happens is that Airbus gave an oppurtunity to the "public" to go onbord the plane.
What happened is that the FBW system of the aircraft failed during the fly-by making the pilot unable to climb, it was a software error, not pilot error.
Airbus was also very irresponsible to allow passenger during a tast flight.
2129261184 4 years ago
That'ss wrong it's Habsheim 's crash
check on web
666Vredesbyrd 3 years ago
Your wires are crossed, this was a test to see if a plane could fly unmanned.
RochdaleHappyGilmore 4 years ago
Actually, it wasn't. It was a fly-by at an airshow, with full crew and even passengers on board. 130 passengers, six crew. Three passengers died, and the cause was determined to be pilot error. You can look up the facts yourself by searching for 'Air France 296'. In fact, the one and ONLY reason some people keep saying the plane was 'unmanned' is this very 24-second video, and the poorly researched and plain wrong comment in it. So no, not unmanned. Unfortunately.
Smoznizjev 4 years ago
Oh, well in that case my error, I remember seeing this video about 1 month or so ago and reading the description on it.
RochdaleHappyGilmore 4 years ago
Off course there were passengers on board u pricks. It wasn't test flight. 296 passengers dead inc pilots. Is that test flight?
LUCIMIL 4 years ago
Unfortunatly, it was being controlled by a computer program for a weedeater
AirmanCylon401 4 years ago
actually there were people onboard this plane, but they survived amazingly
lokjeffrey 4 years ago
Are you people retarded, at the end the guy says "flown by a computer"
latinpapi1 4 years ago
Well, the guy is wrong. It had a full crew AND passengers on board. See my other reply here for details.
Smoznizjev 4 years ago
If you knew anything about aviation you would know that planes are flown by computer today.
There is a system on modern planes called Fly-by-Wire which controls the aircraft, when the pilot moves the stick, a signal is sent throught the FBW to a central computer which then accepts or rejects the pilot control input, if it accepts the input the the hidraulic are moved and thus the aircraft can be flown.
In this case the FBW failed and that happened.
The narrator is referring to the FBW.
2129261184 4 years ago 2
actually, you are totally wrong. Do not talk about Aviation unless you know what you are on about
tonks0013 3 years ago
I do know what i´m talking about, make a search for Fly-by-Wire or just stay ignorant.
2129261184 3 years ago
you are a bumb ass they dont use fly by wire on civlilan aircraft only on b-2 and f-117 stealth bomersand other flying wings
raderrader3911 3 years ago
@raderrader3911 LMAO F-117 cant have fly by wire as it is too old and it wasnt even around back then, and it wouldnt need it as it flies too slow AND furthermore EVERY SINGLE AIRBUS AIRCRAFT HAS FLY BY WIRE
slaneyboi 1 year ago
it was remote controlled
joel709 4 years ago
The pilot and crew died due to computer malfunction. The computer was locked in landing mode and the pilot wanted rize. To bad.
R.I.P.
tomaselvis 4 years ago
wow ur really stupid arent you.. this was an test to see if airplanes could fly unmanned.
HanGookBoi 4 years ago
No, I watched the discovery channel about this crash. You call them stupid?
tomaselvis 4 years ago
NO IT WAS NO!! PEOPLE ON BOARD
tussisussi 4 years ago
So the pilot's and publicity crew not classed as 'people'?
'No passengers' is not the same as 'no people' Of course there were people on board.
wazzmastermax 4 years ago
u sure there were people on board?
varun1704 4 years ago
WHOA
creez34 4 years ago
Did the computer controlling the plane crash? or was it the plane?
FeathersMcGraw1 4 years ago
now THATS A chainsaw hehe=P
wery sad to loose a such a nice plane
air france
tussisussi 4 years ago
They ran MS-DOS in the FMC ...
throttlelever 4 years ago
lol
martyallthatime1 4 years ago
it was a flyby at an airshow
pannono 4 years ago
I like how everybody on here has different views on what happened in the video :) If you listen to what the man says, it was "the first fully automated plane". Computer, not pilot, computer. Also, according to the title and description it was both a takeoff AND a landing. Frankly it looked like neither to me :)
myadder 4 years ago
It was most likely Microsoft Vista That caused it. That guy in the back round was a microsoft investor saying he wasn't going to give money.
OH no OH no OH no!
markeez23 4 years ago
Bullshit. Nobody onboard at all. Just a software glitch. Air France do have an iffy record though...sorry to say.
MuayThaiBoxing 4 years ago
This was at the paris airshow. The plane was being flown by air france's star A320 pilot. He was supposed to be showing what the airbus could do. The report said he couldnt see the trees cause of the angle of the aircraft. The engines get choked by the trees and couldnt power up.
craigjohnson12345 4 years ago
You're right. The altimeter wasn't working and the pilot reported that it read 100 ft when it was actually 30ft.
787A380 4 years ago
@787A380 Did the pilot really say that did he? Out of the loudspeaker system on his coffin then?
slaneyboi 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol
WEIRDCANDY 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
die in hell. lol
totopasbo 4 years ago
I saw the on Discovery Channel too.
The plane was taking off and 3 crews were killed. Subsequent investigation have found that the pilots might have been horseplaying and failed to ascend.
McCowsh1t 4 years ago
ouch wat a waste of money
Patiriktirik 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
noo, this is the first attempt to landing in fully controlled machine, nobodoy are on the plane.
Hectorpilot911 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what a noobie-ass computer -_-
bedshow 4 years ago
hahaha, True
PlanesForLife 4 years ago
looks like it stall
bedshow 4 years ago
RIP.. peepz
dkorda 4 years ago
The comments are fake !
And this was not a landing, and not a take off.
Just a low pass, for an Air Show.
And the engines have not responded when the pilot push the throttle for climbing.
3 deaths in the crash.
Was in France. In Alsace, in Hazbeim
Poke777 4 years ago 2
WRONG.
PlanesForLife 4 years ago
Must have used Linux
JMK853 4 years ago
No, no people were onboard.
aatredes 4 years ago
Incorrect. There were 136 people on board, and only 3 people died. Pilots were in the cockpit, but it's their job to monitor the Fly-By-Wire.
BritishAgent 4 years ago
Yes, there were people aboard.
AlatusLeo 4 years ago
no there werent. it was a test flight.
slipknotrules303 4 years ago
Yes, there were, and no, it was not a test flight. 136 people on board, three died. Search for 'Air France 296' for details.
Smoznizjev 4 years ago
I saw this on Discovery Channel; actually this jet was taking off not landing.....
aatredes 4 years ago
There is people inside the plane ???
VicKiller94 4 years ago
houston ! we have a problem
30hourpunch 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahaahahahahaha that's funny
TheGoodDevil7 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL
eylshazuela 4 years ago
works great
ProctoLogic 4 years ago
and thats why i wont let the computer fly lol
cobralover88 4 years ago
i work in computers. Computers trend to "brake". LOL
jazzmelody 5 years ago