64bit Demo WWDC 2007

[Schlimmerfinger87]

got a 185 mb nasa picture of the world map. and you can zoom in to the bodensee near the alps (medium sized lake in germany) without quality loss. I think he could even zoomed in to the letters of the books ;)

[sahsidtf]

notice how he zooms in only on that one area??

[reallyred123]

where can I get that 4 gb photo?

[Schlimmerfinger87]

@reallyred123 are there bigger one xD? Like up to 16 GB XD?

[LAVASTICK]

Catalogue of 64-bit Software - there are some native 64-bit apps :)

[LAVASTICK]

does this thing work?

[warpq1]

Apple are idiots with their 64 bit...just look at Photoshop, CS4 will be released without a problem for 64 bit Windows operating systems, CS4 for Apple computers will only be released as 32 bit version, because Apple is screwing up again. Who said Microsoft sucks...

[sporknfoon]

thats only half apples fault, adobe are writing the program remember?

[warpq1]

You expect Adobe to rewrite the complete program when Apple plan to plug the plug at a late moment?

You're funny...you've obviously never been a programmer like I was for many year hehe

[sporknfoon]

I think you mean 'pull the plug' and no im not a programmer, but Apple has been pushing 64 bit since the early 10.x releases, and Adobe already had to re-write CS3 for Apple but they decided NOT to do it in 64 bit for reasons unknown to me which is why I have no sympathy for them. Besides, they are making heaps of money. Hire a few more asians to do the boring stuff.

[warpq1]

Listen kid, if you refuse to read the news and still pretend to know everything, then don't be surprised if you make dumb statements. Photoshop is a Carbon application and Apple decided to drop their 64-bit Carbon efforts at WWDC in June 2007.

And as for hiring a few more asians to do the boring stuff; dumb comment too.

[sporknfoon]

And yet Apple are the idiots with their 64 bit, compared to Microsoft where EVERY SINGLE APP AND DRIVER NEEDS TO BE 64 BIT IN A COPY OF 64 BIT WINDOWS OR IT WILL NOT RUN. Hmm, its hard to decide who is more foolish....

[warpq1]

Again, you're not well informed...sigh. While it's true that every driver has to be 64 bit, it doesn't really matter, since Microsoft will only certify 32 drivers for Vista if the manufacturers also develops a 64 bit version.

As for applications having to be 64 bit in Vista; that's also dumb to say this, because 99.9% of all 32 bit applications run just fine in Vista X64. LIke I told you earlier, do some rsearch first to avoid these uneducated replies.

[sporknfoon]

I was actually talking about XP.

[warpq1]

No, you werent, you didn't mention that anywhere, nice try. And as for XP 64 bit, also that OS can run 32 applications without a problem. Wow, you ARE making a complete fool of yourself, now aren't ya? hehe

[TrueLoveQuotient]

Another retard brainwashed 2 worship the cult of 64 bit. Tell us all how U work with so many 4gb images! HAHAHAHA

so useless

[MateriaRing]

Um... PS3 games are in HD... comparatively PS2 games will look jagged. Perhaps if you cited where we can get this 'free stuff' people would be more inclined to believe you. If you're suffering from delusions of l33tness you can call 1-800-668-5337.

[TrueLoveQuotient]

All of this is fraud. They simply set the priority higher on the 64 thingy. 32 bit is actually MUCH faster than 64 bit, just like running DOS 16 bit aps on a PC is WAAAAY faster than running 32 bit aps - LESS OVERHEAD! What U think bits fall from the sky?

Reminds me how people slam old RAM. They fail 2 mention that each new thing - like DDR - is much slower - more overhead. If U want speed, use C type programs on Pre-IE Win95, no joke. It's faster than Linux even - & mac is just BSD.

[k214raZor]

64bit version don't use a disk, so it's mach more faster than 32bit version, bec a 32bit could not work with this picture without disk...

[TrueLoveQuotient]

The lower the number of bits, the faster the result. More bits just enables LARGER addressing. U R all retards, like those wigger dorks chanting 'power handling' when choosing a speaker. All high power handling means is WASTEED POWER AS HEAT. Wha U want is EFFICIENCY and SPL & such things. High 'power handling' is the OPPOSITE of what U need. Grow a brain.

[sporknfoon]

oh my god. you must be living in a shadow, under a rock, in a desert, on the dark side of the moon. Are you seriously this deluded? my god sunshine, do some research, you are approximately 100% wrong.

[TrueLoveQuotient]

Bla bla bla Mr. Kill The Messenger. Everything I said is true & U know it.

[sporknfoon]

kill the messenger? you are delusional, and I'm not the only one here that thinks so. This has nothing to do with 'priority'. It is a 64 bit processor and 64 bit software both working at native speeds and addressing 64 bits of information per clock cycle. As you should know because you clearly know a lot, 64 bit computing can address a lot more MEMORY at once, which explains why it kicked 32bit ass, but it also finished the first line of the filter application FIRST!

[TrueLoveQuotient]

Tell us Mr. 64 - where do those extra bits come from? They drop from the sky do they? Oh sure - all that extra addressing info. - doesn't take N E overhead (right). Nothin' like wastin all yer cash on RAM U don't need :D It makes U 'cool', & all the ass pirates with their rainbow PCs (apples) will love U!

[sporknfoon]

BTW I hope you enjoy the compatibility of Windows 95 on your old cheap PC with ur free, advanced software, sucker. Bahahaha

[TrueLoveQuotient]

Put Win'95 - the version B 4 IE existed - on a modern PC, & it's faster even than N E Linux variant (once U tweak it). I sell lots of 6TB servers runnin' that with a custom java file networking thingy. It's rock stable & more flexy than 'nix, 'cuz it's WinDoze! :D

In other words, none of that 'recompile' B.S. or 'learn advanced programming 2 set up your mouse' nonsense like 'nix HAHAHA

Well 2 B fair, check out how ridiculously overcomplicated 'nix is 2 set up multiple monitors :P

[sporknfoon]

Nothing on a modern PC will run on 95. 95% of applications require xp or > none of your hardware will be compatible or offer a reliable, stable or well featured driver. Interesting to note, I work with files often GREATER than 4GB, however 4GB is the maximum ram that any version of Windows below Vista can handle. Ouch.

[TrueLoveQuotient]

Would U like 2 bet $ on that? Let me know. Put your $ where your mouth is fuker.  I even offered 2 send 1 of my 6TB servers 2 Micro$cam 2 help them improve their OS via my tweaks. That is when I learned their objective is 2 DECREASE performance with each release ;)

They even told me it can't B done - retards. 1 hand doesn't know what the other's doing. Most 'drive overlay' softwares let U run as much size as U want on '95, etc.

[sporknfoon]

No one who can afford 6TB worth of storage speaks like you. Sorry kid, ur busted. Back to junior high.

[TrueLoveQuotient]

U R doing 'poisoning the well' fallacy. U R the clown here. If U like I can send U a server - refund U when U send it back (they R pricey)

[sporknfoon]

U R incomprehensible I cant actually believe for more than two-seconds that you have 'clients'. Sure they might be preschoolers who order cardboard boxes off you, but I don't believe that counts. Not to mention you CAN NOT use RAM cards if you are trying to manipulate files with sizes greater than the maximum system RAM because it is not much faster than disk access therefore pointless. My god your bluff is running tight kid.

[TrueLoveQuotient]

U can mock me all ya' like, but all I'm doing is informing U of facts. Get over it. Your brainwashing is what separates U from real innovators like me.

If U want proof, just tell me what U want & I will explain how 2 do it @ 1/10 the cost U pay now.

[TrueLoveQuotient]

P.S.: None of my clients have requested 4GB+ file size capability in RAM, but if U want can run RAM cards & address them however U like - depending on the controller card (RAM cards hold whatever RAM U want, & the drive controler card mounts those). U can have a zillion-gig file in RAM if U like, running on Win '95.

[xXfalafelXx]

does this mean leopard is running as fast, or faster than tiger on my macbook?

[Olgasys]

generally OS X upgrade makes your machine faster, exact opposite of windows.

[jhdezjr]

that i'm aware if your MacBook has an Intel Core Duo processor it runs at 32-bit and the new Intel Core 2 Duo is full 64-bit compatible.

[Badran7]

i wonder which camera used to take this really huge picture ??

[Olgasys]

Leica has 39 mpixel pro ones.

[Techne]

Are the two instances of this program running in the same iron.. or are they running in a separate box each one? It isnt fair to prioritize the 64bits version, the comparison wont be useful.

[SuCKeRPunCH187]

what is 64 bit?

[GenCollado]

"what is 64 bit?"

64 bit is a processor architecture that takes full advantage of your processor and operating system. Right now, 9/10 you're running 32 bit. Having 64bit increases speed SIGNIFACNTLY.

Lag is non existence and heavy duty tasks fly.

[emeek77]

the same box can run either one. it doesnt mater if its 64 or 32. its all the same..you have to buy windows 64 seperate. 64 bit apps wont work on the 32 bit windows os. developers wont develope 64 bit for windows cause no one has the 64 bit os. with mac every one who has os X has 64 bit