I saw this when I was little and was terrified of the apes. Then I looked back on it in later years and was like "This sucks." My sister convinced me to read the book and it was amazing. That was actually the first Michael Crichton book I ever read, and I've been a huge fan of his ever since. I'm so sad that he died.
They changed or omitted the majority of the important parts of the book, shit on the story, and ruined the reputation of a good MC story. Amy hated the jungle and was a much more in depth character instead of acting like a toddler. Ross was cold and grumpy. All the other characters (except for munro) are added. They add bad characters, completely change the goals of Ross, and leave out the major aspects of the consortium, the intelligence of the white apes, and the tribals. Shame they ruined it
One of the things that really, REALLY pissed me off? They changed Kelly Munroe's name to Munroe Kelly. Was that really necessary? Of all the stupid changes, you change the name of a character.
I don't mind the addition of Herkermer Homolka. I don't like how they almost completely stripped the technical aspect of getting to the Congo.
The consortium isn't even represented in the movie. They use another expedition to replace the plane they find. And don't even have a native battle.
@FreonRose In the book they make tools and weapons to kill intruders. they also come up with strategic ways to get around the electric fences into the peoples' camp
@Thag20 Did you expect a fucking documentary? Since when are they forced to copy stories to the films from the books? Personaly i want film to be interesting and i dont care about how smart some white apes were.
No, not a documentary, but when you remove, change, and destroy 3/4 of the book, it barely looks like it was translated from the book.
If it were made closer to the book, it would have been BETTER. If you haven't read the book, you shouldn't criticize people. The movie that came out was 10 times dumber than the book. The movie, if it had been properly translated from the book, would have been more interesting.
@Draknfyre I was alot younger when i first saw this movie and i found it exciting :). Havent read the book but i quess i can understand your point. Can you explain what are say.... 5 most significant changes between movie and the book?
About 3/4th's of the book was removed. The original story was about finding the diamond mine to use blue diamonds for electronic products, not a single one for a laser. It focused more heavily on the technology aspect. A competing firm, called the consortium, was competing to get there first. It was their plane at the end instead of another expedition. Amy's role was larger, and the grey gorrilas had a bigger part. Even finding Zinj took much longer
It involved more than just stumbling on it like in the book. Beating the consortium to Zinj was a real threat to the group. Karen Ross didn't have a fiance to find, and was more focused and business-like. The attacks on the camp happened more than one night. A good portion of the book the expedition was under the threat of the volcano erupting, it wasn't just a last-minute eruption like in the movie. A fight with a cannibal tribe was also at the end, before they could leave.
I really like this horrible movie. Its just bad but I watch it at least once a year...and i know it sucks. The horrible Amy the Gorilla costume or the plot lines that make no sense. Like how come every plane in the movie gets shot down but they get away in a hot air balloon. Or she throws away a huge diamond to spite her enemy when shoe could have took it to his competition and ran him out of business. but I love this movie none the less
This isn't made very apparant in the movie, but the second plane are shot down by a military faction just like the first. The balloon wasn't near where those factions were. The plane crashed miles away.
And the point of Karen Ross throwing the diamond away was to show she wasn't a heartless bitch. TraviCom was pretty much top of the game in the book and movie. Going to their competition might have ended badly for her, professionally-speaking, of course.
@Draknfyre I know what they were trying to say but it comes off corny. That diamond was the size of a baseball she could have retired off that. What about all those people that just died, that money could have went to their families. But like I say, I like it, I can always watch it. I'm sure the book was very good but the movie was bad. Heres another thing that gets me, How is Ernie Hudson supposed to be a safari guy with that neat processed perm hairstyle. But he's my fav character in the movie
This is another point they didn't make in the movie. The diamond was a blue diamond. It was worthless as far as diamonds go, but it was very good at conducting electricity. Travis wanted them because it would enable him to become king of electronics in his field. This was depicted as being what made the communications laser functionable (and it could be used as a weapon.) In the book, they were after a whole mine of blue diamonds, not just one.
Crichton probably thought of this when he was taking a swig and reading "Heart of Darkness." Then he said "fuck Kurtz, fuck Marlow, you know what... this shit needs MONKEYS, no ... no... no, it needs fucking GOR-eee-LAZ."
Jurassic Park used a ton of CGI. They even used CGI for Ariana Richard's stunt double's face when she looked up into the vent when she fell. She wasn't supposed to do that, but they kept the take in, and used CGI to place Ariana Richard's face on her face.
Because it was a bad, bad translation from the book. The book is much more in-depth. They took out most parts of the book for the movie. Characters were removed or added, or had their names changed. The entire ending with a fight with a tribe was taken out, the expedition was much shorter than it really was, many details about the technology used was skipped, the entire subplot of Amy being returned was shortened. The plot boiled down to "get this diamond", instead of the mine
No, part of the movie dealt with returning an ape to Africa. The book dwelt more on this. Until they actually got there, the apes weren't known to exist, and the diamond mines were considered a myth. In the book, one of the tribes actually took care of the injured man, where in the movie he died. I don't think it had racist overtones.
The book goes into more detail about this. This was an ancient "diamond mine" of King Solomon (it's actually based on a real location), in the movie it was an old volcano, and the diamonds were raised from the ground. The lava brought them up with other material, and it cooled down, leaving the diamonds nearer the surface to be mined. The holes you see in the rock lead to the gorilla's caves, and where the miners dug the diamonds out. You see the volcano erupt at the end.
And diamonds are not infused with minerals. Diamonds are carbon from the former remains of plants or animals that have been compressed over time. With lots of time and heat, the carbon is slowly compressed into a pure form.
The diamonds in this movie are slightly different. They are blue diamonds, and they are being sought for their technological use rather than their money value. The diamond was encased in dirt and rock when they hit it, and broke the dirt and rock open.
Look man, I appreciate you are trying to bring awareness to that in the Congo, and that it's terrible the amount of rapes that exist, but you are obviously copying that from a web site, and posting it on all videos related to the Congo, and I am going to have to remove it.
I think Congo is the best adventure movie ever made. Plus I like the parts with WHO'S KAFKA? TELL ME!!! and STOP EATING MY SESAME CAKE!!! Those were pretty funny. Congo:10/10.
@Alibanini Lol yeah that's Bruce Campbell Alright, I remember this movie along time ago he played a character name: Charlie Travis a scientist. plus I remember seeing him in this movie cause I think he picked up or found a severed thumb on the ground and that's when he heard a noise and turned around which then the gorillas attacked him after he screams. Wow I can't believe I just remembered that whole scene :D.
@Draknfyre Oh ok thanks for the tip xD now I know that he finds an eyeball on the ground, Turns screams and gets attacked xD thanks for the tip again.
How so? You are in an area where there are apes that want to kill you. Apes are generally an endangered species. If you are in the area where the apes will kill you, you are the endangered species. It makes perfect sense if you understand what endangered means. The apes aren't in real danger from you, and they outnumber you.
Actually it's a Secret History that shouldnt of been revealed but now it's not worth keeping hidden who would believe a race of people were domesticated Ape/Man kind and set free in their own land. only to evolve and turn on their teachers thinking they were holding out on all the knowledge.
They weren't "ape/men", the book made it pretty clear they were a race of deformed gorrilas that were trained to be extremely violent to protect the mines. They turned on their masters because they were trained to defend the mines, and they killed the people there, too.
No, it wouldn't have. CGI is overused nowadays. The fact that some of the gorillas looked so good, and some people even mistook Amy as a real gorilla, shows how good the suits were.
@Draknfyre I agree. There was nothing wrong with the suits they used for this film. They are extremely credible. I didn't know that Amy or any of the killer apes weren't real gorillas up until a year ago when I heard they were indeed suits. I'd actually spent the last 15 years wondering how they trained the gorillas to perform so well.
Jurassic Park was one of the biggest CGI movies then, and the biggest in '93. Today the CGI still holds up. Why? Because they didn't go overboard with it, and they used it smartly. They didn't try to make every single thing out of CGI
CGI isn't to blame, the over use of CGI is to blame. I enjoy good special effects, animatronic and CGI alike, but it annoys me when film makers go over board.
I agree, CGI can ruin a movie thru over use, cough(indianajones4)cough, but it can also make a good film even better, allah Lord Of The Rings. even though I have to admit that I like practical effect much better than CGI because it's much more inventive.
After Jurassic Park made a ton of money they hoped making another movie based on Crichtons book would pay off, the problem is this movie sucked. The apes are clearly people in suits.
This movie is a major disappointment for Crichton fans (a lot like the other adaptations of his books). Worst part of the movie was the lava. The book actually makes it a point to say the lava is not the real problem. It moves too slow to be any danger to you. The real danger is the smoke, ash, and debris. But lava that chases you seemed more theatrically fun.
I think this movie was very underrated. 1995 was the year of my favorite movies - Copycat, The Net, Congo, Braveheart, GoldenEye, Money Train, Dangerous Minds...
"I am your great, white guide....even though I happen to be black." one of my favorite lines. This trailer really misrepresents the movie and the movie isnt a real good interpretation of the book. Yet, for some reason, I like this movie. Good to know at least one other person does too :P
Who's Kafka? Tell me!
Leatherbubba 5 days ago
*Goes to IMDB, searches "Congo", sees Tim Curry's name, dies a little* "No, it can't be true. Tell me it's not true!"
indielovesunicorns 1 month ago
I saw this when I was little and was terrified of the apes. Then I looked back on it in later years and was like "This sucks." My sister convinced me to read the book and it was amazing. That was actually the first Michael Crichton book I ever read, and I've been a huge fan of his ever since. I'm so sad that he died.
indielovesunicorns 1 month ago
There is a updated cover of Congo on DVD but I am not going to tell you where it is.
norskman69 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Love this movie.
Nightmonkey17 3 months ago
"That's a real monkey."
"No, that's a guy in a suit."
"Okay, so *that's* a real monkey."
"No, that's another guy in a suit!"
"I see what you're saying. That's a guy in a suit!"
"No, that's a real monkey!"
"...We're gonna have to see this again."
envysiblegirl 5 months ago
@EddieWyatt1 The book was fucked up, but a great book. The movie in my opinion is OK, but the book is 1000x better.
CParsnips 5 months ago
are those the same villagers chanting that were in the fall?
they look really familiar... hmmm...
divabrat12 5 months ago
@EddieWyatt1
OMG me too!!!
divabrat12 5 months ago
They changed or omitted the majority of the important parts of the book, shit on the story, and ruined the reputation of a good MC story. Amy hated the jungle and was a much more in depth character instead of acting like a toddler. Ross was cold and grumpy. All the other characters (except for munro) are added. They add bad characters, completely change the goals of Ross, and leave out the major aspects of the consortium, the intelligence of the white apes, and the tribals. Shame they ruined it
Thag20 6 months ago 5
@Thag20
One of the things that really, REALLY pissed me off? They changed Kelly Munroe's name to Munroe Kelly. Was that really necessary? Of all the stupid changes, you change the name of a character.
I don't mind the addition of Herkermer Homolka. I don't like how they almost completely stripped the technical aspect of getting to the Congo.
The consortium isn't even represented in the movie. They use another expedition to replace the plane they find. And don't even have a native battle.
Draknfyre 6 months ago 2
@Thag20 actually they made the white apes pretty damn smart. dunno about the rest because i've never read the book. lol
FreonRose 3 months ago
@FreonRose In the book they make tools and weapons to kill intruders. they also come up with strategic ways to get around the electric fences into the peoples' camp
Thag20 3 months ago
@Thag20 ah,guess you got a point because all they did in the movie was grunt n' clobber. they did figure out how to get around the fences though.
FreonRose 3 months ago
@Thag20 Did you expect a fucking documentary? Since when are they forced to copy stories to the films from the books? Personaly i want film to be interesting and i dont care about how smart some white apes were.
Deater90 2 months ago
@Deater90
No, not a documentary, but when you remove, change, and destroy 3/4 of the book, it barely looks like it was translated from the book.
If it were made closer to the book, it would have been BETTER. If you haven't read the book, you shouldn't criticize people. The movie that came out was 10 times dumber than the book. The movie, if it had been properly translated from the book, would have been more interesting.
Draknfyre 2 months ago
@Draknfyre I was alot younger when i first saw this movie and i found it exciting :). Havent read the book but i quess i can understand your point. Can you explain what are say.... 5 most significant changes between movie and the book?
Deater90 2 months ago
@Deater90
About 3/4th's of the book was removed. The original story was about finding the diamond mine to use blue diamonds for electronic products, not a single one for a laser. It focused more heavily on the technology aspect. A competing firm, called the consortium, was competing to get there first. It was their plane at the end instead of another expedition. Amy's role was larger, and the grey gorrilas had a bigger part. Even finding Zinj took much longer
(Continued in next comment.)
Draknfyre 2 months ago
@Deater90
It involved more than just stumbling on it like in the book. Beating the consortium to Zinj was a real threat to the group. Karen Ross didn't have a fiance to find, and was more focused and business-like. The attacks on the camp happened more than one night. A good portion of the book the expedition was under the threat of the volcano erupting, it wasn't just a last-minute eruption like in the movie. A fight with a cannibal tribe was also at the end, before they could leave.
Draknfyre 2 months ago
I really like this horrible movie. Its just bad but I watch it at least once a year...and i know it sucks. The horrible Amy the Gorilla costume or the plot lines that make no sense. Like how come every plane in the movie gets shot down but they get away in a hot air balloon. Or she throws away a huge diamond to spite her enemy when shoe could have took it to his competition and ran him out of business. but I love this movie none the less
amensupremera 6 months ago
@amensupremera
This isn't made very apparant in the movie, but the second plane are shot down by a military faction just like the first. The balloon wasn't near where those factions were. The plane crashed miles away.
And the point of Karen Ross throwing the diamond away was to show she wasn't a heartless bitch. TraviCom was pretty much top of the game in the book and movie. Going to their competition might have ended badly for her, professionally-speaking, of course.
Draknfyre 6 months ago
@Draknfyre I know what they were trying to say but it comes off corny. That diamond was the size of a baseball she could have retired off that. What about all those people that just died, that money could have went to their families. But like I say, I like it, I can always watch it. I'm sure the book was very good but the movie was bad. Heres another thing that gets me, How is Ernie Hudson supposed to be a safari guy with that neat processed perm hairstyle. But he's my fav character in the movie
amensupremera 6 months ago
@amensupremera
This is another point they didn't make in the movie. The diamond was a blue diamond. It was worthless as far as diamonds go, but it was very good at conducting electricity. Travis wanted them because it would enable him to become king of electronics in his field. This was depicted as being what made the communications laser functionable (and it could be used as a weapon.) In the book, they were after a whole mine of blue diamonds, not just one.
Draknfyre 6 months ago
This started my fear of monkeys... S:
VidaDeKat 6 months ago
Crichton probably thought of this when he was taking a swig and reading "Heart of Darkness." Then he said "fuck Kurtz, fuck Marlow, you know what... this shit needs MONKEYS, no ... no... no, it needs fucking GOR-eee-LAZ."
ChuloGoatWild 7 months ago
i'm reading the book
abc12319525 7 months ago
this is one amazing film!<3
matthewlovesbritney 7 months ago
jurassic park barely used any CGI :D
greivous45 7 months ago
@greivous45
Jurassic Park used a ton of CGI. They even used CGI for Ariana Richard's stunt double's face when she looked up into the vent when she fell. She wasn't supposed to do that, but they kept the take in, and used CGI to place Ariana Richard's face on her face.
Draknfyre 7 months ago
it was scary the first time, why would you want to remake it!
feberlinecniv 8 months ago
@feberlinecniv
Because it was a bad, bad translation from the book. The book is much more in-depth. They took out most parts of the book for the movie. Characters were removed or added, or had their names changed. The entire ending with a fight with a tribe was taken out, the expedition was much shorter than it really was, many details about the technology used was skipped, the entire subplot of Amy being returned was shortened. The plot boiled down to "get this diamond", instead of the mine
Draknfyre 8 months ago
XD i like how people are getting technical about this
Fahstudios13579 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyone else sense odd unconsciously racist undercurrents? "We want things out of Africa but there are these goddam apes there."
mortalkonlaw 8 months ago
Anyone else smell odd unconsciously racist undercurrents? "We want things out of Africa but there are these goddam apes there."
mortalkonlaw 8 months ago
@mortalkonlaw
No, part of the movie dealt with returning an ape to Africa. The book dwelt more on this. Until they actually got there, the apes weren't known to exist, and the diamond mines were considered a myth. In the book, one of the tribes actually took care of the injured man, where in the movie he died. I don't think it had racist overtones.
Draknfyre 8 months ago
Comment removed
scar504 8 months ago
@scar504
The book goes into more detail about this. This was an ancient "diamond mine" of King Solomon (it's actually based on a real location), in the movie it was an old volcano, and the diamonds were raised from the ground. The lava brought them up with other material, and it cooled down, leaving the diamonds nearer the surface to be mined. The holes you see in the rock lead to the gorilla's caves, and where the miners dug the diamonds out. You see the volcano erupt at the end.
Draknfyre 8 months ago
@scar504
And diamonds are not infused with minerals. Diamonds are carbon from the former remains of plants or animals that have been compressed over time. With lots of time and heat, the carbon is slowly compressed into a pure form.
The diamonds in this movie are slightly different. They are blue diamonds, and they are being sought for their technological use rather than their money value. The diamond was encased in dirt and rock when they hit it, and broke the dirt and rock open.
Draknfyre 8 months ago
@Draknfyre i knew some know it all would correct me..its a joke dont take it seriously
scar504 8 months ago
@scar504
No offense, but you see alot of misinformed comments on YouTube. I was just correcting one. You didn't have to remove your comment.
Draknfyre 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Draknfyre i knew some know it all would correct me..its a joke dont take it seriously
scar504 8 months ago
@MrGrevy
Look man, I appreciate you are trying to bring awareness to that in the Congo, and that it's terrible the amount of rapes that exist, but you are obviously copying that from a web site, and posting it on all videos related to the Congo, and I am going to have to remove it.
Draknfyre 8 months ago
@Draknfyre It's from a news report, so what? Grow a pair!
MrGrevy 8 months ago
@MrGrevy
Because while I sympathize with the report, and it is terrrible, you are still spamming on a video.
Draknfyre 8 months ago
@Draknfyre You say spam, I say promoting awareness for people to stay AWAY from that rape-ridden hellhole.
MrGrevy 8 months ago
This movie looks good plus I seen it at wal-mart for five bucks.
confidentdog2011 8 months ago
The diamonds are heere and queer and not going anyweere
velocikiller13 9 months ago
**spoiler** everyone gets AIDS and dies
jbm2005 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
**spoiler** everyone gets AIDS and dies
jbm2005 9 months ago
Comment removed
jbm2005 9 months ago
Now that's the real ape, right?
No, that's a guy in a suit.
Leatherbubba 10 months ago
thanks i apreciate it man.
MOVIEmania709 10 months ago
man i haven't seen this for like 7 years does anyone know where i can get it on dvd
MOVIEmania709 10 months ago
@MOVIEmania709
Well, Wal-Mart might have it. It's usually in the cheap DVD aisle, like $5 or $10.
Draknfyre 10 months ago
This movie was famous for being filmed mostly in the studio lot. Yes, including the jungle.
It's a HORRIBLE, horrible movie, but I've always had a soft spot for it for some reason. Call it a fetish. :P
Great Jerry Goldsmith score, by the way.
samsamba08 10 months ago
@samsamba08
Part of it was filmed in Africa. They said they wanted to film in the actual Congo, but even the edges were too dangerous.
The hippo attack scene was filmed in the Paramount Studio parking lot. They put up dams, and flooded it.
Draknfyre 10 months ago
Seannaers brought me here :)
crazypencil100 11 months ago
I just read the book. Is the movie worth watching?
evil3drummer 11 months ago
@evil3drummer
Well, it's one of the worst book-to-movie translations I have ever seen, but it won't hurt to watch it.
Draknfyre 11 months ago
I think Congo is the best adventure movie ever made. Plus I like the parts with WHO'S KAFKA? TELL ME!!! and STOP EATING MY SESAME CAKE!!! Those were pretty funny. Congo:10/10.
musicwweConkergamer 11 months ago
they should have kept bruce campbell in the movie. all he needed was a chainsaw and his boomstick and he would be able to save everyone.
looking back at it now, that movie sucked ass. keeping bruce in it would have made it awesome.
14words2liveby 11 months ago
@14words2liveby i got a fever and the only prescription is more boomstick!, so give me some sugar babe!.
kratos3821 11 months ago
"Some for fortuoooone". Great over the top-narrator!
RacsoHillgreen 1 year ago
This trailer is fucking BADASS!
ooozetoons 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please stop eating my sesame cake....
samigol 1 year ago
its the dude from nip tuck dr mcnamara
LordOftheMind 1 year ago
thumbs up if you saw this thanks to the nostalgia critic
shpared 1 year ago
someone give me the narrator a glass of water
TMThenu 1 year ago
some....for forchoon....WTF? you mean fortune?
bdgerety 1 year ago
"What's your name?"
"Claude."
"Claude? Wow, that's an unusual name for somebody from, um... where you from?"
"Mombasa."
"Mombasa? Wow, that's an unusual name for somebody from Mombasa."
"Have you ever been to Mombasa?"
"Um... no."
"Then what do you know about it?"
"I wanna go home." :(
Batman8657 1 year ago 2
@Batman8657 LOIL
1emcmarine 1 year ago
"Those apes are smart... too damn smart" worst line, ever
kcx4 1 year ago
@kcx4 fud duh wuh
1emcmarine 1 year ago
Is that Bruce Campbell? :D
Alibanini 1 year ago 3
Yes, it is.
Draknfyre 1 year ago
@Draknfyre Haha! No way, I love that guy! Ima have to watch this now :P
+ for the ever classic 'Stop eating my sesame cake!'
Alibanini 1 year ago
@Alibanini Lol yeah that's Bruce Campbell Alright, I remember this movie along time ago he played a character name: Charlie Travis a scientist. plus I remember seeing him in this movie cause I think he picked up or found a severed thumb on the ground and that's when he heard a noise and turned around which then the gorillas attacked him after he screams. Wow I can't believe I just remembered that whole scene :D.
themoviereviewer1000 1 year ago
He picked up an eyeball. The book made sure you knew when the gorillas killed you, your eyeballs would go flying out. It was shown once in the movie.
Draknfyre 1 year ago
@Draknfyre Oh ok thanks for the tip xD now I know that he finds an eyeball on the ground, Turns screams and gets attacked xD thanks for the tip again.
themoviereviewer1000 1 year ago
lol
cacaorocks 1 year ago
love it
kr81452 1 year ago
STOP EATING MY SESAME CAKE!!!
kekeboy97 1 year ago
lol "where you are the endangered species" that shit doesnt even make any sense
cmonutube 1 year ago
@cmonutube
How so? You are in an area where there are apes that want to kill you. Apes are generally an endangered species. If you are in the area where the apes will kill you, you are the endangered species. It makes perfect sense if you understand what endangered means. The apes aren't in real danger from you, and they outnumber you.
Draknfyre 1 year ago 10
@Draknfyre youre right
cmonutube 1 year ago
@Draknfyre YEAH LOOL
1emcmarine 1 year ago
@Draknfyre Looks like 6 people don't even know what a species is. Maybe look it up in the dictionary.
robbyart2 1 year ago
@cmonutube LOL! ;D
1emcmarine 1 year ago
where you are the endangered species
N3wGrass 1 year ago
bull shit
sunder6585 1 year ago
the book is tons better than the movie! any other michael crichton fan would also agree.
henf5671 1 year ago
Actually it's a Secret History that shouldnt of been revealed but now it's not worth keeping hidden who would believe a race of people were domesticated Ape/Man kind and set free in their own land. only to evolve and turn on their teachers thinking they were holding out on all the knowledge.
KeemLegendPA 1 year ago
They weren't "ape/men", the book made it pretty clear they were a race of deformed gorrilas that were trained to be extremely violent to protect the mines. They turned on their masters because they were trained to defend the mines, and they killed the people there, too.
Draknfyre 1 year ago
i don't know which is worst: smart gorillas or smart raptors. :)
ultilinium8 2 years ago
smart raptors
Brownshoe24 1 year ago
Mr. Halmolka? Stop eating my sesame cake.
Doomsdaywarrior 2 years ago 2
I have this movie some parts have CGI.
Fatzombie1980 2 years ago
man i remember this movie!! great one!! love it!
xStalkerxx 2 years ago
This movie would have been better if the gorillas are CGI.
Tyrannozero82 2 years ago
No, it wouldn't have. CGI is overused nowadays. The fact that some of the gorillas looked so good, and some people even mistook Amy as a real gorilla, shows how good the suits were.
Draknfyre 2 years ago 22
Comment removed
VerySourLemon 2 years ago
Comment removed
VerySourLemon 2 years ago
Nope, not only would it break copyright, but I can't upload anything over 10 minutes, and I am not splitting it up into dozens of files.
Not that I am advocating piracy, but if you look around the internet, I am sure you could find a copy until you could get the DVD.
Draknfyre 2 years ago
They really did. I even mistook Amy for a real gorilla. They probably would have had insurance issues with real gorillas though.
worthyambition 1 year ago 2
@Draknfyre I agree. There was nothing wrong with the suits they used for this film. They are extremely credible. I didn't know that Amy or any of the killer apes weren't real gorillas up until a year ago when I heard they were indeed suits. I'd actually spent the last 15 years wondering how they trained the gorillas to perform so well.
redbandmagic 1 year ago
@Draknfyre i would love to see this remade, preferably in a manner similar to the book. This looks godawful.
zillatamer 8 months ago
@Tyrannozero82 nah, cgi would be impressive...but you can always tell its cgi. the gorillaz here look somewhat tangible and "more real"
bsides, cgi back in 1995 wouldve sucked compred to what you are probably expecting
mbenzsl2000 1 year ago
@mbenzsl2000
Jurassic Park was one of the biggest CGI movies then, and the biggest in '93. Today the CGI still holds up. Why? Because they didn't go overboard with it, and they used it smartly. They didn't try to make every single thing out of CGI
Draknfyre 1 year ago 5
ROGER EBERT THOUGHT THIS WAS A COMEDY!
now thats bad!
looney1023 2 years ago 3
bruce campbell 1:31 and 1:35
JoelH790 2 years ago 2
NEXT NOSTALGIA CRITIC!!!!!!!!
SUPERMEDIABROTHERS6 2 years ago 6
Trailer still scares the shit out of me espeacily the loud sounds in the begining creepy
bigninja27 2 years ago
Please stop eating my sesame cake....
thcman4 2 years ago 24
@thcman4 HAVE SOME....STOP EATING MY SESAME CAKE
loilero 1 year ago
@thcman4 Raaaaarr! That make gorilla angry.
robbyart2 1 year ago
The audio is outta sync :-(
supercool1710 2 years ago
Notice my description?
Draknfyre 2 years ago
There was a time when people were dissapointed that this was done with costumes and animatronics, not CGI.
Now we would pay fortunes, to see movies with organic effects, instead of computer-generated ones!
Grafwichmann 2 years ago 3
CGI isn't to blame, the over use of CGI is to blame. I enjoy good special effects, animatronic and CGI alike, but it annoys me when film makers go over board.
FunkyFrank10 2 years ago
I agree, CGI can ruin a movie thru over use, cough(indianajones4)cough, but it can also make a good film even better, allah Lord Of The Rings. even though I have to admit that I like practical effect much better than CGI because it's much more inventive.
SUPERMEDIABROTHERS6 2 years ago
1995 had to been the best year ever because movies now had cgi and most importantly was the music there was alot of good bands that year
Fatzombie1980 2 years ago
After Jurassic Park made a ton of money they hoped making another movie based on Crichtons book would pay off, the problem is this movie sucked. The apes are clearly people in suits.
smith8833 2 years ago
this movie made twice its budget
jpatton1989 2 years ago
no, you mean they're not real?
muscleoffigus 2 years ago
fucking awesome movie
godnutt 2 years ago
This movie is a major disappointment for Crichton fans (a lot like the other adaptations of his books). Worst part of the movie was the lava. The book actually makes it a point to say the lava is not the real problem. It moves too slow to be any danger to you. The real danger is the smoke, ash, and debris. But lava that chases you seemed more theatrically fun.
arthereld 2 years ago
I think this movie was very underrated. 1995 was the year of my favorite movies - Copycat, The Net, Congo, Braveheart, GoldenEye, Money Train, Dangerous Minds...
Congo is awesome movie!
Magnolia296 2 years ago 4
the book is pretty bamf , i heard the movie kinda sucked tho... but it looks like its got a good cast
kirstynlh 2 years ago
Awful movie on most levels, yet, there is something about it I can't help but like.
Skull10 3 years ago 2
HORRIBLE!!! They should remake this movie
23letters 3 years ago
Agreed I said that too..it needs to be more intense
Maximus1Decimus 3 years ago
How old is this movie?
776036 3 years ago 2
1995.
Draknfyre 3 years ago
oh so that's the name of the movie, this movie use to freak me out when I was a kid
DjArpegius 3 years ago
Noo!
Im scared of monkeys now :(
swiinkz 3 years ago
omg nice
jedihamsterfilms007 3 years ago
That movie looks like it blows. The book was awesome though.
EnderxWiggin2070 3 years ago
"I am your great, white guide....even though I happen to be black." one of my favorite lines. This trailer really misrepresents the movie and the movie isnt a real good interpretation of the book. Yet, for some reason, I like this movie. Good to know at least one other person does too :P
razberryclownsac 3 years ago 3
totally agree.
Mercury888 3 years ago
michel critons books are just awsome
bassfishinfever 3 years ago
I remember when this movie came out. They marketed it everywhere.
ScratStitch 3 years ago
that's awesome
i grew up with this movie...it's one of my favorites
^_^
nessa887 3 years ago