Looks to me like a gaymaro just got walked on by a little NA 281. I suspect even without the 100 shot, on an even launch, it would be an awkward moment for Mr. gaymaro and his 'powerful' 378CI engine. :)
@9b8 i replied to this without watching the video and assumed that since it was mach 1 vs ss i figured the SS in question was from the same era as the mach 1 (ls1 Fbody era) my mistake i apologies
lol so much hate on this page... ive beaten the new ss camaros in my mach 1 with out spray haha even the owners tell me how heavy they are.. 400 hp dosnt mean shit if ur driving a fucken tank
fords are the biggest pieces of shit haha "mustang mach 1 w/100 shot, off road X, bla bla bla vs camaro..."looked stock". And you guys are saying chevys are crap? Now this guys saying DOHC thinking thats fuckin badass and shit..LOL
@yuutuba11 Well I personally don't even like the new camaro, the interior is garbage, the windows are small as shit, and the exterior isnt very appealing unless you do it right. BUT....mustangs are still shit too lol. And the fact that this guys braggin he beat a camAro with a 100 shot is rediculous and utterly retarded.
@mike510 i dont see anyone bragging, just a 4.6 litre engine spanking a camEro. the mach 1 is a better car overall. why do you think there are so many mustangs on he road? Ford sells so many of them year after year for a reason... just watch the video and stop getting butthurt
@yuutuba11 Theres so many on the road cuz all the bitches and mexicans buy them. So answer me this...why if you were to go on craigslist right now the camaro's show value...as to where the mustangs you can get for dirt cheap....cuz nobody wants them and their pieces of shiEt.
@mike510 its funny that the bitches and Mexicans even know what to buy haha. camEros have higher value because theyre not very common. chevy couldnt sell it to save their lives. Mustang wins in this video and overall in sales. and if nobody wanted them they wouldnt sell so well...watch the video again. Mustang>CamEro :)
@yuutuba11 first off, its CAMARO not camero, secondly the 4.6 liter engine was a POS (unless it was hand fuckin built by the SVT teams) the intake manifolds cracked on almost every GT car. secondly lets look at the 90's shall we? 94-2000 Mustang GT=225bhp, 98-2002 Cobra SVT=305bhp (after that they supercharged the engine and that really sets them apart), 92-97 Z28=275bhp, 98-2003 Z28=310bhp,2000-03 SS=330bhp (remember the Chevy is all motor and IMO all muscle cars should be) so you tell me,
@insatiableTy im not sure what you think you're accomplishing by posting all those specs that you just googled. ive known those basic specs for years. my brother had a mostly stock a4 lt1 Camaro years back and it was pretty mean for a $4500 car. Put a bus on my beat up 5.0. im very familiar what f-bodys can do. and the whole "camEro thing is complete sarcasm. I respect and love f-bodys but prefer mustangs. I just hate when peple try to rag on mustangs. its a band wagon thing to make fun of them.
@yuutuba11 just like mustang fans rag on camaro's. but the facts are the facts it took a supercharger for the 4.6 liter to beat the 5.7 and that is fine but it is still a fact. and another fact is the Intake manifolds on the late 90's mustang GTs were shit. I have nothing against mustangs i like camaro's more but will give credit were credit is due, Also just a side note, I own a '98 LS1 powered Z28, my bestfriend has a '94 Z28 with the LT4 conversion in it and my brother in law has a '98 cobra.
@insatiableTy also i just noticed that most of your specs are wrong anyway.. 94-98 mustang GT was a 215-225 hp car. 99-04 GT was a 260hp car, also, there was no 2002 cobra in the US. and the 2001 rated at 320hp, also, the 96-98 cobra ran door to door with most LS cars. also, car and driver tested the 2000GT M5 vs the 2000 M6 Z28 and the GT was quicker in the 1/4 mile, more comfy, retailed for less, and got more mpgs. the aftermarket world is also bigger for mustangs.
@yuutuba11 i was giving general specs,im sorry i didnt specify 215-225bhp and this was all off the top of my head i dont google shit to seem smart and seeing as you needed to google that i was being GENEROUS to the GT's by saying 225 i kind of feel like you are taking this a little to seriously i couldnt find your 2000 car and drivervid but feel free to watchTHIS CAR AND DRIVER video =====> C&D 1999: Chevrolet Camaro Z28 vs Ford Mustang GT Comparison Road Test
@insatiableTy ive already seen that. did you miss where they said "the LS1 engine borrowed from the corvette"? lol. also, i have a hard time taking cars seriously when they have a 9 foot dash and look like a catfish. ever heard of the 2011 GT? im not taking this seriously whatsoever. ive seen stock 99-04 GTs beat ls1s and ive seen some bolt on LS1s that are in Terminator (2003/2004 Cobra) territory. bottom line is they wouldnt sell like crazy every year if they werent great sports cars.
@yuutuba11 ya i have a hard time taking a car seriously that i could smokein my old honda prelude, MUSTANG GT! COUCH! COUGH! lol to each their own i guess
@insatiableTy Preludes, integras and RSX's also make girl cars. And civics and turdcels and paseos are perfect for tonka toy grads (young boys). Let's not kid around pointing fingers about exclusivity. If I drove a civic or prelude or anything of that nature, I would be VERY humble and mostly keep my mouth shut, unless it was a seriously built, tuned, and balanced car, with numbers to prove it. Nope, turbo kits and mail-order tunes don't count. Nor do headers.
@yuutuba11 which car you would rather drive the camaro with 300+BHP or the mustang with only 25 more horsepower then an H22a4 Honda Civic.....also the1/4 mile on the LS1 camaros was better then the N/A 4.6 liter 90's cobras (once they S/C the cobras though they ate almost everything but like i said i'm more into keeping things ALL MOTOR)just so you know....
Hmmm a modded mustang against a unmodded camaro. Why even post this? If the camaro was modded it would be a different story. Nothing unexpected to see here.
@caperjim He posted this to show how much better ford is than chevy... I agree with you last statement, "Nothing unexpected to see here". Well duh of course that DOHC was gonna win
LOL even your passenger got excited for that one did he jizz too?? LMAO go race a SS with the same same MOD's as your's let's see how happy you are after that run that mach 1 stock for stock would have a hard time keeping it's nose infront of a stock Camaro V6.
@MrMartinez789 WRONG. a stock Camaro v6 is a slow bitch. the mach 1 is rated at 305 hp but actually has 320 hp. and that's b4 u get up to speed and get a few xtra hp via the extra cold air coming in through the scoop. the v6 maro doesn't use its 305 hp well enough to keep up with the mach 1. people mod their cars so they can beat other cars... they don't mod their cars so they can go lose to a faster car. the ss maro already has over 400 hp. and still got beat by this well modded mach 1.
either the camaro was a v6 or he didnt know that was a race. if it was an ss and he knew what was going on MABEY he wouldve lost but definitely not by that much
@svt89 Theres not many of them at all I mean they only produced 9652 in 2003 probably not much more or less than that in 2004 so to own one is the be one of very few people in the world that do so consider your self lucky, I know I do!
2003 Black Mach Flow Masters, Long Tubes 3.73's and 65mm Twin Throttle Body
Wait you guys are arguing about this Camaro being slow vs the Mach? As it just lost to a bolt on Mach 1 with a 100 shot? Your joking right.... Smh Did the Camaro owner even know you were bout to run him as he pulled up? I mean you were already in high rpms as he began to pass you & he looked like he was just cruising. Meaning he had to downshift then get back on it while you were already taking off in a better gear? Anyway I own a 01 Z28 & love the looks of 5th gens but they weigh WAY TO MUCH!
@DoggyB22 The new SS's are pretty slow I would rather have a LS1 SS personally. The new SS's are over rated, I watched one get beat by bus lengths by a stock 04 Cobra rated at less HP.
I'm not arguing but the only thing that is really holding the 5th gen Camaro back is its weight. Its got everything else going for it. I mean 3800-4000 lbs is just WAY to much weight for it. If it was in the 3400-3600 lb range it would be a hell of a car! But what some of the people are saying about the 5th gen Camaro on here is retarded... & realistically a stock 04 Cobra shouldn't beat a 5th gen Camaro by "bus lengths" since they both have around 400 hp & run the same 1/4 mile...
@DoggyB22 My LT1 hung with a new SS, and I just have a 6spd, few bolt on's exhaust nothing major. People will buy what they want to buy nothing wrong with the SS camaro, but I just think its kinda overrated in terms of performance. It says 400+HP but it barely overtakes LS1 SS's... I hope GM resigns the camaro in a couple years. I hope they go with a killer retro look that's not so bulky.
Depending on whats done to both cars Id say that was driver error. Because they can run mid 12s stock.... I own a LS1 & most LT1 with minor bolts aren't running that. Like I said the only thing that is holding it back against a LS1/LT1 is its weight. Otherwise its got a better power band & obviously makes more power. But GM is switching to the Alpha Platform in 2014-2016 so it will be lighter
Mmmmm dude I don't think even with a 100 shot they'll b able to keep up, yea so is trying to do a fly by so I used my bottle cause I knew this baby was gonna cry lol.
@FoxRacingGirl13 idk the SS only runs a 1/4 mile in 13, which machs can do bone stock with a good driver. plus the SS is almost 4000lbs. watch?v=2aSEMM0vDfg this guy smokes a SS with even fewer mods.
@hec03beast next time you should inform the other driver that there is a race going on...or at least have the decency not to do the ricer take off when the other driver is clearly just cruising by.
@hec03beast an intake tune exhuast mach putting down 320whp which is average will have a superior power to weight ratio than an ls3 maro. not to mention l99's are surprisingly easy kills for any f body even fellow chevys. the new pony cars are so goddamn heavy
Haha us slow? Ur home boy just got smoked and if u got the same car as him, il b happy to do another fly by on ur ass this time! lol bring it chevy boy I'm in Reno.
@xuraniumx The Mach 1 stock has a faster 0-60 than the Camaro SS by .1 seconds on paper... and this kid has put more than enough money into his to stomp out your ls3. No offense, but anything ABOVE the GT is actually pretty quick.
@xuraniumx I have a stock 04 Mach 1 and i kill 2010 SS. Dude u have a heavy pig that AT BEST does 0-60 in 4.7 and 1/4 at 13 flat. My mach does 0-60 in 4.9 and 1/4 at 13.2 with only a 315hp 4.6. Sorry but the 2010+ camaros are a disgrace to their brand. The Ls1s put up a better fight.
@Pktmnstr yep....that is what all chevy people say when they lose...." I WAS NOT EVEN TRYING"....and never an explanation nor proof why they think that chevy is better other than saying..." CHEVY IS JUST BETTER"....get a life you goon and do your homework...a mach 1 is not a mustang gt....mach's are way faster and the camaro driver did not know that was not a mustang gt....and yea you can hear the camaro shify down...and how sad... a 4.6 beats a 6.2 litre... hahaha
@Pktmnstr yet why did he slow down to get beside him man you maro boys will say anything at least dude in the mustang said he used nos hahhahaha big ass babys
@badrice: I'm not sure where you live, but I wouldn't come to Memphis barking all that shit about slow Chevy cars, if I were you. I can't count on all my fingers and toes the number of GM monsters out here that would hurt the feelings of mustang and import owners both.
@Pktmnstr That's because GM only made about a zillion of them, have saturated the market since the fucking 50s, instead of a few, well defined brand names. And then they stick essentially the same power trains in all of them. I'm not sure if that is much to brag about per se, but OK. But I rarely see apples to apples comparison of GM vs brand X. These sort of fallacies are what breeds ignorance. Heaven forbid a bad boy 400+ CI big block Camaro be pitted against a Boss 429, and so on.
1- did u give him the finger?.....2 - that had to make him feel like a retard, haha
ROBBY639 4 days ago
Looks to me like a gaymaro just got walked on by a little NA 281. I suspect even without the 100 shot, on an even launch, it would be an awkward moment for Mr. gaymaro and his 'powerful' 378CI engine. :)
9b8 1 month ago
@9b8 what camaro do you know of that came with a 378ci engine??? aAnswer me this, are you retarded or are you attempting at sarcasm????
insatiableTy 1 month ago
@insatiableTy Uh, 6.2L = 378CI. The LS3/L99/LSA family of GM engines are 6.2L. No, no sarcasm. Retarded? What say you?
9b8 1 month ago
@9b8 i replied to this without watching the video and assumed that since it was mach 1 vs ss i figured the SS in question was from the same era as the mach 1 (ls1 Fbody era) my mistake i apologies
insatiableTy 1 month ago
@insatiableTy Okie dokie. It happens.
9b8 1 month ago
I beat a stock gt in my grand price it was like a 07. 0-60 which is my worse in acceleration. Fwd v8 time to go in the snows
zachattack83 1 month ago
lol so much hate on this page... ive beaten the new ss camaros in my mach 1 with out spray haha even the owners tell me how heavy they are.. 400 hp dosnt mean shit if ur driving a fucken tank
marquis781 4 months ago
fords are the biggest pieces of shit haha "mustang mach 1 w/100 shot, off road X, bla bla bla vs camaro..."looked stock". And you guys are saying chevys are crap? Now this guys saying DOHC thinking thats fuckin badass and shit..LOL
mike510 4 months ago
@mike510 when your taking about a $10k car thats 7+ years old raping an ugly goofy looking slow heavy ass camEro then yes chevys are crap.
yuutuba11 4 months ago
@yuutuba11 Well I personally don't even like the new camaro, the interior is garbage, the windows are small as shit, and the exterior isnt very appealing unless you do it right. BUT....mustangs are still shit too lol. And the fact that this guys braggin he beat a camAro with a 100 shot is rediculous and utterly retarded.
mike510 4 months ago
@mike510 i dont see anyone bragging, just a 4.6 litre engine spanking a camEro. the mach 1 is a better car overall. why do you think there are so many mustangs on he road? Ford sells so many of them year after year for a reason... just watch the video and stop getting butthurt
yuutuba11 4 months ago
@yuutuba11 Theres so many on the road cuz all the bitches and mexicans buy them. So answer me this...why if you were to go on craigslist right now the camaro's show value...as to where the mustangs you can get for dirt cheap....cuz nobody wants them and their pieces of shiEt.
mike510 4 months ago
@mike510 its funny that the bitches and Mexicans even know what to buy haha. camEros have higher value because theyre not very common. chevy couldnt sell it to save their lives. Mustang wins in this video and overall in sales. and if nobody wanted them they wouldnt sell so well...watch the video again. Mustang>CamEro :)
yuutuba11 4 months ago
@yuutuba11 first off, its CAMARO not camero, secondly the 4.6 liter engine was a POS (unless it was hand fuckin built by the SVT teams) the intake manifolds cracked on almost every GT car. secondly lets look at the 90's shall we? 94-2000 Mustang GT=225bhp, 98-2002 Cobra SVT=305bhp (after that they supercharged the engine and that really sets them apart), 92-97 Z28=275bhp, 98-2003 Z28=310bhp,2000-03 SS=330bhp (remember the Chevy is all motor and IMO all muscle cars should be) so you tell me,
insatiableTy 3 months ago
@insatiableTy im not sure what you think you're accomplishing by posting all those specs that you just googled. ive known those basic specs for years. my brother had a mostly stock a4 lt1 Camaro years back and it was pretty mean for a $4500 car. Put a bus on my beat up 5.0. im very familiar what f-bodys can do. and the whole "camEro thing is complete sarcasm. I respect and love f-bodys but prefer mustangs. I just hate when peple try to rag on mustangs. its a band wagon thing to make fun of them.
yuutuba11 3 months ago
@yuutuba11 just like mustang fans rag on camaro's. but the facts are the facts it took a supercharger for the 4.6 liter to beat the 5.7 and that is fine but it is still a fact. and another fact is the Intake manifolds on the late 90's mustang GTs were shit. I have nothing against mustangs i like camaro's more but will give credit were credit is due, Also just a side note, I own a '98 LS1 powered Z28, my bestfriend has a '94 Z28 with the LT4 conversion in it and my brother in law has a '98 cobra.
insatiableTy 3 months ago
@insatiableTy also i just noticed that most of your specs are wrong anyway.. 94-98 mustang GT was a 215-225 hp car. 99-04 GT was a 260hp car, also, there was no 2002 cobra in the US. and the 2001 rated at 320hp, also, the 96-98 cobra ran door to door with most LS cars. also, car and driver tested the 2000GT M5 vs the 2000 M6 Z28 and the GT was quicker in the 1/4 mile, more comfy, retailed for less, and got more mpgs. the aftermarket world is also bigger for mustangs.
yuutuba11 3 months ago
@yuutuba11 i was giving general specs,im sorry i didnt specify 215-225bhp and this was all off the top of my head i dont google shit to seem smart and seeing as you needed to google that i was being GENEROUS to the GT's by saying 225 i kind of feel like you are taking this a little to seriously i couldnt find your 2000 car and drivervid but feel free to watchTHIS CAR AND DRIVER video =====> C&D 1999: Chevrolet Camaro Z28 vs Ford Mustang GT Comparison Road Test
insatiableTy 3 months ago
@insatiableTy ive already seen that. did you miss where they said "the LS1 engine borrowed from the corvette"? lol. also, i have a hard time taking cars seriously when they have a 9 foot dash and look like a catfish. ever heard of the 2011 GT? im not taking this seriously whatsoever. ive seen stock 99-04 GTs beat ls1s and ive seen some bolt on LS1s that are in Terminator (2003/2004 Cobra) territory. bottom line is they wouldnt sell like crazy every year if they werent great sports cars.
yuutuba11 3 months ago
@yuutuba11 ya i have a hard time taking a car seriously that i could smokein my old honda prelude, MUSTANG GT! COUCH! COUGH! lol to each their own i guess
insatiableTy 3 months ago
@yuutuba11 also the majority of mustang sales are V6 models...and yes they make great teenage girl sports cars... just likethe convertable beetle
insatiableTy 3 months ago
@insatiableTy Preludes, integras and RSX's also make girl cars. And civics and turdcels and paseos are perfect for tonka toy grads (young boys). Let's not kid around pointing fingers about exclusivity. If I drove a civic or prelude or anything of that nature, I would be VERY humble and mostly keep my mouth shut, unless it was a seriously built, tuned, and balanced car, with numbers to prove it. Nope, turbo kits and mail-order tunes don't count. Nor do headers.
9b8 1 month ago
@yuutuba11 which car you would rather drive the camaro with 300+BHP or the mustang with only 25 more horsepower then an H22a4 Honda Civic.....also the1/4 mile on the LS1 camaros was better then the N/A 4.6 liter 90's cobras (once they S/C the cobras though they ate almost everything but like i said i'm more into keeping things ALL MOTOR)just so you know....
insatiableTy 3 months ago
Lol the camero even got the jump.
spicky786 4 months ago
nice man,
glitchez 5 months ago
Hmmm a modded mustang against a unmodded camaro. Why even post this? If the camaro was modded it would be a different story. Nothing unexpected to see here.
caperjim 6 months ago
@caperjim Its a 2010 SS! My lord dude... get over it...
Texarmageddon 6 months ago
@caperjim He posted this to show how much better ford is than chevy... I agree with you last statement, "Nothing unexpected to see here". Well duh of course that DOHC was gonna win
2VModularPowerHouse 4 months ago
people always hate on mustangs. you can clearly hear the camaro floor it when it got next to the mach. mach blew it away plain and simple
hfdskaterhi 6 months ago
LOL even your passenger got excited for that one did he jizz too?? LMAO go race a SS with the same same MOD's as your's let's see how happy you are after that run that mach 1 stock for stock would have a hard time keeping it's nose infront of a stock Camaro V6.
MrMartinez789 6 months ago
@MrMartinez789 WRONG. a stock Camaro v6 is a slow bitch. the mach 1 is rated at 305 hp but actually has 320 hp. and that's b4 u get up to speed and get a few xtra hp via the extra cold air coming in through the scoop. the v6 maro doesn't use its 305 hp well enough to keep up with the mach 1. people mod their cars so they can beat other cars... they don't mod their cars so they can go lose to a faster car. the ss maro already has over 400 hp. and still got beat by this well modded mach 1.
JunkyardMunky 4 months ago
how do you miss 4th???
CallAnAmberLampsLOL1 6 months ago
damn now i want nitrous on my mach
TheHydrocortisone 7 months ago
either the camaro was a v6 or he didnt know that was a race. if it was an ss and he knew what was going on MABEY he wouldve lost but definitely not by that much
jsk8drummer 7 months ago
lol the camaros a v6
GreekBballa21 7 months ago
@badrice1 LOL thats why i drive a ford nice mach not very many were im from.
svt89 8 months ago
@svt89 Theres not many of them at all I mean they only produced 9652 in 2003 probably not much more or less than that in 2004 so to own one is the be one of very few people in the world that do so consider your self lucky, I know I do!
2003 Black Mach Flow Masters, Long Tubes 3.73's and 65mm Twin Throttle Body
mustanglover1985 7 months ago
Wait you guys are arguing about this Camaro being slow vs the Mach? As it just lost to a bolt on Mach 1 with a 100 shot? Your joking right.... Smh Did the Camaro owner even know you were bout to run him as he pulled up? I mean you were already in high rpms as he began to pass you & he looked like he was just cruising. Meaning he had to downshift then get back on it while you were already taking off in a better gear? Anyway I own a 01 Z28 & love the looks of 5th gens but they weigh WAY TO MUCH!
DoggyB22 9 months ago
@DoggyB22 The new SS's are pretty slow I would rather have a LS1 SS personally. The new SS's are over rated, I watched one get beat by bus lengths by a stock 04 Cobra rated at less HP.
SuRihtanil 7 months ago
@SuRihtanil
I'm not arguing but the only thing that is really holding the 5th gen Camaro back is its weight. Its got everything else going for it. I mean 3800-4000 lbs is just WAY to much weight for it. If it was in the 3400-3600 lb range it would be a hell of a car! But what some of the people are saying about the 5th gen Camaro on here is retarded... & realistically a stock 04 Cobra shouldn't beat a 5th gen Camaro by "bus lengths" since they both have around 400 hp & run the same 1/4 mile...
DoggyB22 7 months ago
@DoggyB22 My LT1 hung with a new SS, and I just have a 6spd, few bolt on's exhaust nothing major. People will buy what they want to buy nothing wrong with the SS camaro, but I just think its kinda overrated in terms of performance. It says 400+HP but it barely overtakes LS1 SS's... I hope GM resigns the camaro in a couple years. I hope they go with a killer retro look that's not so bulky.
SuRihtanil 7 months ago
Comment removed
DoggyB22 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SuRihtanil
Depending on whats done to both cars Id say that was driver error. Because they can run mid 12s stock.... I own a LS1 & most LT1 with minor bolts aren't running that. Like I said the only thing that is holding it back against a LS1/LT1 is its weight. Otherwise its got a better power band & obviously makes more power. But GM is switching to the Alpha Platform in 2014-2016 so it will be lighter
DoggyB22 7 months ago
Mmmmm dude I don't think even with a 100 shot they'll b able to keep up, yea so is trying to do a fly by so I used my bottle cause I knew this baby was gonna cry lol.
hec03beast 10 months ago
@hec03beast DUMB........ If that camaro was racing u woulda been eatting dust.
FoxRacingGirl13 3 months ago
@FoxRacingGirl13 idk the SS only runs a 1/4 mile in 13, which machs can do bone stock with a good driver. plus the SS is almost 4000lbs. watch?v=2aSEMM0vDfg this guy smokes a SS with even fewer mods.
svbummin 3 months ago
@hec03beast next time you should inform the other driver that there is a race going on...or at least have the decency not to do the ricer take off when the other driver is clearly just cruising by.
insatiableTy 3 months ago
Comment removed
Storm7289 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hec03beast an intake tune exhuast mach putting down 320whp which is average will have a superior power to weight ratio than an ls3 maro. not to mention l99's are surprisingly easy kills for any f body even fellow chevys. the new pony cars are so goddamn heavy
Storm7289 1 month ago
Id hate to see a 100 shot on a ls3 but then again using the bottle is for babies lol.
svt89 10 months ago
Haha us slow? Ur home boy just got smoked and if u got the same car as him, il b happy to do another fly by on ur ass this time! lol bring it chevy boy I'm in Reno.
hec03beast 11 months ago
I have an stock ls3 2010 Camaro and I wanna race to show how slow those mustangs are!
xuraniumx 11 months ago
@xuraniumx The Mach 1 stock has a faster 0-60 than the Camaro SS by .1 seconds on paper... and this kid has put more than enough money into his to stomp out your ls3. No offense, but anything ABOVE the GT is actually pretty quick.
volcom133 11 months ago
@xuraniumx I have a stock 04 Mach 1 and i kill 2010 SS. Dude u have a heavy pig that AT BEST does 0-60 in 4.7 and 1/4 at 13 flat. My mach does 0-60 in 4.9 and 1/4 at 13.2 with only a 315hp 4.6. Sorry but the 2010+ camaros are a disgrace to their brand. The Ls1s put up a better fight.
angeflr 10 months ago
I know right, I did fly by him pretty fast lol
hec03beast 11 months ago
I dont think that Camaro knew there was a race happening.
Pktmnstr 11 months ago 9
@Pktmnstr yep....that is what all chevy people say when they lose...." I WAS NOT EVEN TRYING"....and never an explanation nor proof why they think that chevy is better other than saying..." CHEVY IS JUST BETTER"....get a life you goon and do your homework...a mach 1 is not a mustang gt....mach's are way faster and the camaro driver did not know that was not a mustang gt....and yea you can hear the camaro shify down...and how sad... a 4.6 beats a 6.2 litre... hahaha
ROBBY639 6 months ago
@Pktmnstr yet why did he slow down to get beside him man you maro boys will say anything at least dude in the mustang said he used nos hahhahaha big ass babys
saleenxxx 3 months ago
@Pktmnstr ...that is funny considering u can see him punch it, haha...before the mustang
ROBBY639 4 days ago
youll prob still whomp that ass on motor
1badmach103 1 year ago
Yea I'm sure he was I heard his car shift down and take off
hec03beast 1 year ago
Was that dude even racing?
sheqishabaz 1 year ago
@badrice: I'm not sure where you live, but I wouldn't come to Memphis barking all that shit about slow Chevy cars, if I were you. I can't count on all my fingers and toes the number of GM monsters out here that would hurt the feelings of mustang and import owners both.
Pktmnstr 8 months ago 5
@Pktmnstr hit up some of the mustangs at dynospeed and see how many times you lose...
MRwieduwilt 4 months ago
@Pktmnstr That's because GM only made about a zillion of them, have saturated the market since the fucking 50s, instead of a few, well defined brand names. And then they stick essentially the same power trains in all of them. I'm not sure if that is much to brag about per se, but OK. But I rarely see apples to apples comparison of GM vs brand X. These sort of fallacies are what breeds ignorance. Heaven forbid a bad boy 400+ CI big block Camaro be pitted against a Boss 429, and so on.
9b8 1 month ago
dats a bad ass race
lilbeastpowell 1 year ago
Thanx but I wanted to do all motor but he just took off on me so I decided to spray
hec03beast 1 year ago
good shit bro! missed 4th and still whooped that ass!
Eros1031 1 year ago