@ScienceFoundation Same can be said for (religious) evolutionismists, and anyone can throw out a "willfuly ignorant" anyday. It's meaningless unless it's backed up.
@ScienceFoundation Evolution exists in the mind only, while signs of creation are literally everywhere, do some research sometime; for starters, just open your eyes and think how did this get here and why. You can think for yourself you know instead of following mainstream propaganda. Ignorance is not your major problem, what you believe in print is a biggie.
@Craigmw45 sure, where's the best soils? in cold climbs where the growing season is short; I get it; coincidence; where else? tropics where land is limited where it lacks? deserts ..more coincidence right? and soil itself is magical no? a tiny seed in it + water and poof a giant tree; remove the tree, add another seed; and repeat; that's some inspiring stuff! Take away the soil and nothing. How LOGICALLY do you propose soil "evolved?" I propose it was designed intelligently like everything else.
@gr8vibes2 Wow.... I mean Wow. Did you think that you could make up what ever you wanted and simply proclaim it as evidence for creation without being called out for it? The best soils are not in colder climates.
Even if we ignore the factual inaccuracy, this isn't evidence for creation. It's just an appeal to ignorance. "Things are complex therefor they must have been designed"
@Craigmw45 I second the wow appeal .. your rebuttle is jaw dropping and do some research; soil in the areas I mentioned is among the richest; dodging, lying or ignoring facts whichever is your excuse, none is more blind than the willfully ignorant
@gr8vibes2 "your rebuttle is jaw dropping and do some research; soil in the areas I mentioned is among the richest"
No in fact it's quite the opposite. The Taiga biome is the largest biome in the world, and is characterized by very poor soil conditions, specifically because it's in a cold climate. I guess you could simply ignore that, but it seems stupid to do so because it covers 27% of the earths land surface.
@gr8vibes2 "none is more blind than the willfully ignorant"
Right you are. But in the future don't call your opponent willfully ignorant, if your simply making stuff up. He might come back with some facts as I did in the comment below and make you look rather foolish.
But who care's even if everything you said wasn't incorrect, your still not explaining how it's evidence for creation.
@Craigmw45 and in the future I expect a little more than false accusations; so now you're not sure what I said wa correct! So is everything you've said up till now just a bluff? Again, do some research and come back and we'll talk eye to eye. So far this discussion is beneath me. Your debate standards are in serious question.
@gr8vibes2 "Again, do some research and come back"
I did. Cold climates have poor soil specifically because they are cold. I specified the Taiga biome (or the boral forests) which covers a full 1/4 of the earths surface. It has poor soil throughout, and since it's found in Canada, and Siberia, it's certainly cold.
My debate style is in question? Your only response to this fact is to ignore it, and then insult my intellect.
@gr8vibes2 Actually you've only supported my argument further by pointing out polar regions having poor soil because what do you need for growth for most types of vegetation? Warmth and direct sunlight. And where on earth is the only place lacking such necessities? Areas near the poles. And as you said, these areas, like deserts have less good soil. Again, you'll eventually just pass it off a sheer coincidence; it's just a matter of time.
@gr8vibes2 "Actually you've only supported my argument further"
No I'm pointing out that your ignoring 1/4 of the earths surface when you say that colder climates have fertile soil. This is cold, and has very poor soil, making your statement false.
I'm not going to be selective in what facts I accept.
Not to mention you still can't connect this to a deity creating the earth, which is kind of an important omission.
@Craigmw45 more lies; because the first few of your posts were empty; until now you've done no research; so being a liar also beneath me I'll have to bid you ado
I actually referenced my points. You have done nothing of the sort, only accusations of me lying, and simply deciding to ignore the largest ecosystem in the world, covering a 1/4 of the surface.
But I can see why you would like to leave, as connecting soil fertility to creation by a deity, quickly become untenable when the facts directly contradict your hypothesizes, and I'm not willing to ignore them.
@gr8vibes2 soil is not a living organism, no one says it evolved, no one thinks evolution says this except apparently you. if you put your comment in video form it would possibly win the golden crocoduck award, seriously, thats how fucking stupid you are
@wearestarstuffsagan and no one projects that I think soil evolved except apparently you. Where did I say soil evolved? I was saying soil is strategically placed on earth. So if some form of intelligence didn't do it, what did? Evolution? Bahahah! Seriously, stop reading into what people say aka projecting and planting words in people's mouths. Quack quack quack.
@Eye2EyeIIIV we are not only related to apes, we ARE apes, even if god created all the species separate (we know god didnt create every species because we have witnessed speciation) we would still be genetically, physically and biochemically apes.
@ScienceFoundation Was that a genuine case of begging the question? I think it was. You even answered it yourself! Typical of someone with too much time on their hands and not enough interpersonal skills. They ask their own questions, and answer them too! Now let me try- based on the aforementioned symptoms, possible split personality sufferrer? You sure do make a good case that would appear so.
@FreakShizzlez Apparently you missed the other 40 or 50 videos on which I asked 'How does this support creation or contradict evolution?'
Funny how you only respond when I answer it myself, but then instead of trying to actually contradict anything I said, you immediately resort to ad hominems.
So if I was wrong; How does the information in this video contradict evolution or support creation?
@ScienceFoundation Oh wait, so you CAN actually recognize the distinction between logical fallacies and those valid, but yet you knowingly resort to them anyway?! Hmmm...I wonder why that is. But trsut me, unlike you, I don't have to answer it myself. Frankly it does so itself.
It is interesting that atheists are watching your channel ...they must know that God exists or they wouldn't bother seeing the vids!
houndjog 1 month ago
Joke of the day "Liver evolved."
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 Or "Creationists still think their willful ignorance is an argument"
ScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@ScienceFoundation Same can be said for (religious) evolutionismists, and anyone can throw out a "willfuly ignorant" anyday. It's meaningless unless it's backed up.
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 No it can't, as evolution has already been backed up, over and over. That's where the willful ignorance of creationists come in.
ScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@ScienceFoundation Evolution exists in the mind only, while signs of creation are literally everywhere, do some research sometime; for starters, just open your eyes and think how did this get here and why. You can think for yourself you know instead of following mainstream propaganda. Ignorance is not your major problem, what you believe in print is a biggie.
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 "while signs of creation are literally everywhere"
OK name one. Positive evidence for the creation model please. I keep asking for this, and not once has anyone even tried to come up with anything.
Craigmw45 1 month ago in playlist More videos from BereanBeacon
@Craigmw45 soil
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 errr... Really. Do you wonder why creationists are regarded by and large as quacks? Soil?
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@Craigmw45 Yes soil, mr. poo-poo evonist.
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 OK then... I don't suppose you could explain why.
Craigmw45 1 month ago in playlist More videos from BereanBeacon
@Craigmw45 sure, where's the best soils? in cold climbs where the growing season is short; I get it; coincidence; where else? tropics where land is limited where it lacks? deserts ..more coincidence right? and soil itself is magical no? a tiny seed in it + water and poof a giant tree; remove the tree, add another seed; and repeat; that's some inspiring stuff! Take away the soil and nothing. How LOGICALLY do you propose soil "evolved?" I propose it was designed intelligently like everything else.
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 Wow.... I mean Wow. Did you think that you could make up what ever you wanted and simply proclaim it as evidence for creation without being called out for it? The best soils are not in colder climates.
Even if we ignore the factual inaccuracy, this isn't evidence for creation. It's just an appeal to ignorance. "Things are complex therefor they must have been designed"
Come on, post evidence, not blind speculation.
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@Craigmw45 I second the wow appeal .. your rebuttle is jaw dropping and do some research; soil in the areas I mentioned is among the richest; dodging, lying or ignoring facts whichever is your excuse, none is more blind than the willfully ignorant
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gr8vibes2 "your rebuttle is jaw dropping and do some research; soil in the areas I mentioned is among the richest"
No in fact it's quite the opposite. The Taiga biome is the largest biome in the world, and is characterized by very poor soil conditions, specifically because it's in a cold climate. I guess you could simply ignore that, but it seems stupid to do so because it covers 27% of the earths land surface.
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 "none is more blind than the willfully ignorant"
Right you are. But in the future don't call your opponent willfully ignorant, if your simply making stuff up. He might come back with some facts as I did in the comment below and make you look rather foolish.
But who care's even if everything you said wasn't incorrect, your still not explaining how it's evidence for creation.
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@Craigmw45 and in the future I expect a little more than false accusations; so now you're not sure what I said wa correct! So is everything you've said up till now just a bluff? Again, do some research and come back and we'll talk eye to eye. So far this discussion is beneath me. Your debate standards are in serious question.
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 "Again, do some research and come back"
I did. Cold climates have poor soil specifically because they are cold. I specified the Taiga biome (or the boral forests) which covers a full 1/4 of the earths surface. It has poor soil throughout, and since it's found in Canada, and Siberia, it's certainly cold.
My debate style is in question? Your only response to this fact is to ignore it, and then insult my intellect.
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@Craigmw45 I meant lower than waay up north; not tundra areas; your debate style was in question yes; quite frankly what intellect?
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 Actually you've only supported my argument further by pointing out polar regions having poor soil because what do you need for growth for most types of vegetation? Warmth and direct sunlight. And where on earth is the only place lacking such necessities? Areas near the poles. And as you said, these areas, like deserts have less good soil. Again, you'll eventually just pass it off a sheer coincidence; it's just a matter of time.
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 "Actually you've only supported my argument further"
No I'm pointing out that your ignoring 1/4 of the earths surface when you say that colder climates have fertile soil. This is cold, and has very poor soil, making your statement false.
I'm not going to be selective in what facts I accept.
Not to mention you still can't connect this to a deity creating the earth, which is kind of an important omission.
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 That's not to mention the fact that even if what you said wasn't catastrophically wrong, it's still not evidence for creation.
Cold climates have fertile soil... Your missing several large steps to connect that idea to evidence for a deity creating the earth.
But since that fact is so wrong that the opposite is in fact true, why bother, perhaps you should just reload and try again.
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 And since twice now you have accused me of not doing research, I'll give you something I'm sure I'll never see from you, REFERENCES
Element cycling in taiga forests: state-factor control, K Van Cleve
Substrate limitations to microbial activity in taiga forest floors, ED Vance
The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities, FS Chapin III
Don't worry I'm sure that you can still claim this is beneath you, and happily ignore 1/4 of the earths surface to make your point
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@Craigmw45 more lies; because the first few of your posts were empty; until now you've done no research; so being a liar also beneath me I'll have to bid you ado
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 LOL
I actually referenced my points. You have done nothing of the sort, only accusations of me lying, and simply deciding to ignore the largest ecosystem in the world, covering a 1/4 of the surface.
But I can see why you would like to leave, as connecting soil fertility to creation by a deity, quickly become untenable when the facts directly contradict your hypothesizes, and I'm not willing to ignore them.
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@gr8vibes2 soil is not a living organism, no one says it evolved, no one thinks evolution says this except apparently you. if you put your comment in video form it would possibly win the golden crocoduck award, seriously, thats how fucking stupid you are
wearestarstuffsagan 1 week ago
@wearestarstuffsagan and no one projects that I think soil evolved except apparently you. Where did I say soil evolved? I was saying soil is strategically placed on earth. So if some form of intelligence didn't do it, what did? Evolution? Bahahah! Seriously, stop reading into what people say aka projecting and planting words in people's mouths. Quack quack quack.
gr8vibes2 1 week ago
@ScienceFoundation backed up by quackery and lies doesn't quite cut it; ignorance? that's where projections come in
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
"I am not an animal! I am a human being! I am a man!"
~ John Merrick
Eye2EyeIIIV 1 month ago
@Eye2EyeIIIV well, considering that if you are a human, you are by definition, an animal, that is one dumbass quote
wearestarstuffsagan 1 week ago
@wearestarstuffsagan if you think we're "related" to apes or whatever, you're mistaken.
Even if G-d didn't create the apes, monkies, chips, etc, people would've STILL look for animal that looked "very close" to humans.
Eye2EyeIIIV 1 week ago
@Eye2EyeIIIV we are not only related to apes, we ARE apes, even if god created all the species separate (we know god didnt create every species because we have witnessed speciation) we would still be genetically, physically and biochemically apes.
wearestarstuffsagan 1 week ago
Was this supposed to contradict evolution or support creation? Because it doesn't.
ScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@ScienceFoundation i find this youboob channel to be slightly bizarre.
roaringwaterbay 1 month ago
@ScienceFoundation I don't think even he knows the answer to this question.
Lombrette1657 1 month ago
@ScienceFoundation Was that a genuine case of begging the question? I think it was. You even answered it yourself! Typical of someone with too much time on their hands and not enough interpersonal skills. They ask their own questions, and answer them too! Now let me try- based on the aforementioned symptoms, possible split personality sufferrer? You sure do make a good case that would appear so.
FreakShizzlez 1 month ago
@FreakShizzlez Apparently you missed the other 40 or 50 videos on which I asked 'How does this support creation or contradict evolution?'
Funny how you only respond when I answer it myself, but then instead of trying to actually contradict anything I said, you immediately resort to ad hominems.
So if I was wrong; How does the information in this video contradict evolution or support creation?
ScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@ScienceFoundation Oh wait, so you CAN actually recognize the distinction between logical fallacies and those valid, but yet you knowingly resort to them anyway?! Hmmm...I wonder why that is. But trsut me, unlike you, I don't have to answer it myself. Frankly it does so itself.
FreakShizzlez 1 month ago