Cryengine 3 walkthrough demo Cevat Yerli Commentary

[gbushimprov]

Did Cevat just say rectal physics at 1:18?

[TripleFootage]

2:14 thats so bullshit ... Xbox 360 and PS3 will always look similer and PC will look amazing

ps. I own an 360 so don't hate, plus I DO think PS3 is cool too :)

[heartlessentity]

Whoever said the human eye can't more than 30 frames a second is highly misinformed. First off, calculating the "fps" of the human eye is a very tricky business. The human eye doesn't calculate sight by frames, it just is. And second, to recreate the fluidity of real life, it's generally agreed that around 500 fps is required to be believable.

[TheDanceMan95]

i got told this was codename kingdoms WTF?? if you got a link sending you hear for Codenames plz let me know aswell otherwise my computers fucked

[619MAD]

but why he whant to let crysis look the same on each system :( pc is so much more power...

[lorin1996]

why isn't there anti aliasing for ps3 and xbox -.-

[SPECTRE9200]

@lorin1996 because consoles aren't powerful enough.

[dorksterful]

was this game crysis 2 or something else??

[BluesDices]

european woods rock xD

[BBrtqB]

water at 5:05 is orgasmic

[snail562]

i just came...

[theAYLEEYUN]

I cant until video games look real

[CoasterfanMNS]

hahaha you can hear so strong that the speaker has a german / turkish dialect XD

[dooshtoomun]

4:54 - 6:24 Elder Scrolls 5!!

6:48 - 9:28 Kvatch??

[Dopenosed26]

Cryengine 3 creates the most beautiful worlds in any games available. Comparing it to the Unreal 3 is sad. Unreal can't compete at all.

[GrandHighGamer]

@Dopenosed26 A brand new engine looks better then one that's like 4-5 years old now? Shit.

[Zanxion]

It can look amazing, but if it's not doing 60fps, then forget it.

[SuckItLily]

@Zanxion forget 60 fps, only a few racing games run at that rate, shooters are normally 30 (cod, killzone2, halo reach) and thats enough. you realize how much graphical fidelity those three examples would lose if they were supposed to run at double the framerate?

[Naetrox]

@Zanxion

Your eyes can't really see more than 30.

[FOGoticus]

The second map for the PS3 was laggy....

[DesaiahulD]

Cryengine 3 gives best of realistic world from hardware out there from 2007, supports DX-9,10&11.

[hardkoregamer1981]

@knowledgegranted Nvidia's ceo released the specs of the rsx gpu during the demo presentation rsx's capbilities a few years ago.@GEARSCOMBATANT1 you have proven that you have little technology sense about hardware & game development so there was nothing to debunk but ignorance & stupidity.

[knowledgegranted]

Um, this is very wrong. If you see my friend Lumooja has said it already. Leadwerks is likewise real-time. So, like he stated below, there are two that we know of.

[VisualKnights]

I wonder why the development of those games has stopped. I would buy them purely for graphical beauty only.

Amazing how they wright shaders for almost every sinle texture where water falls on. Pitty the gamer didn't get really close to the waterfall. Those softparticles looked really good. Also the textures from up close have nice quality. This engine will be very pricy no doubt.

[Lumooja]

Cevat said there is no other engine in the world which does everything in real-time, but Leadwerks Engine does that also. So there are 2 engines in the world which do that.

[715Lundvall]

@Lumooja yes but i would like to see you create a level with palm trees and a river and also make it realistic and detailed like Cryengine 3 and then I'll agree that Leadwerks is real-time.

[zackdrink2]

@Lumooja And UDK does it...

[hardkoregamer1981]

@gearscombatant1...your pretty hung up on microsoft & that means your either a microsoft pr or a brain washed microsoft fanboy brain washed by company hype or a ignorant misinformed fool or all of the above lmfao!

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

You're pretty dense.

I've made my points.

Now you've gotta debunk them.

[BoobaKuba09]

Very nice visuals but will the A.I be dumbed down? What about the weapons in the game? I will be so mad if we have to pay for DLC to get all the extra shit that should have been included in the game.

[F3rgul]

So CryEngine3 is more advanced on PC than CE2? the next PC title will be more advanced than Crysis? I thought Crytek were focusing now on multiplatform singular engine development so there not focusing on pushing the PC for now?

[SynodCenturion]

@F3rgul

Crytek still focused on making the Cryengine 3 pushing the PC to the limit again.

The Cryengine will be fully unlocked in all capabilities for PC only. the consoles are again hardware limited.

As example with one of those extra features is, Tesselation. and The deferred lighting system for the PC version has higher propagation volume and shall support faster global illumination, thnx to the pc's higher Buffer Memory.

Also PhysX, not rated for Consoles. Nvidia thingy :P

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

And I'm not exactly comparing console hardware to PC hardware. The fact of the matter is that the Cell is a server cpu, and general purpose cpu's have, and always been better for gaming.

Also note, the original argument was that Crysis would look and run better on the 360. Which is most likely gonna be the case, seeing as the 360 has a better GPU, and almost all games today are GPU limited.

[rollokb2]

however, a CELL cpu is very good at doing large repetitive calclations much like a graphics card

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

Except since ALL the consoles have very little ram, this capability isn't as good as its potential.

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

But in the case of gaming, games are built for regular CPU's, seeing as that's what 99% of regular users have in their PC's....

Gaming will ALWAYS be optimized more for regular CPU's.

[chirlakato]

Maybe now all of the uptight gay PC-only Fanboys who only boast about PC specs can understand that graphics computing goes FAR BEYOND just hardware....without the software/programming and development optimizations and extensive testing, High-end hardware means nothing. Actually, in most cases, LIKE this, the development/optimization is more critical than just throwing in a billion dollar hardware. THAT's called inefficiency and wasting resources.

[solidsnackumzzz]

@chirlakato Exactly what i was thinking

[chirlakato]

@solidsnackumzzz

Thank you lol, that one guy obviously doesn't know what he's talking about, I just got finished elaborating (just as you did) on how a CONSOLE is custom-made and it's architecture CANNOT be compared to the standard of even an i7 Quad CPU in the name of both PS3's 8-core Cell CPU and even 360's 3.2ghz Triple-Core IBM. There's NOTHING to 'multi-task' on with a Console designed SOLEY for gaming AND optimized for gaming and instruction sets ONLY for games specifically.

[solidsnackumzzz]

@chirlakato nice to know theres are still those that dont talk out their arse, and know their shit.

[chirlakato]

@solidsnackumzzz

Yeah, I agree! There's far too many (for better lack of word) PC or Console "fanboys" who TRY to make arguments without even knowing solid facts as far as technology period. I love consoles and I love PC's...both for their distinct architecture that separates them almost totally on paper stats.....yet both see real world performance on similar applications...  which points out the obvious, the architect AND parallel development for EACH set of hardware. PPL don't realize it

[solidsnackumzzz]

@chirlakato all very true

[chirlakato]

@solidsnackumzzz

Yep..... I don't think people or "enthusiast" give much (if any) credit to the programmers and development teams of the game ENGINES. They're constantly going around boasting about PC specs or console wars of PS3 and 360 which is better.... but it seems NO ONE cares or even points out the REAL determining factor if it would even run on a supercomputer mainframe if it lacks drivers and the engine it runs on to even utilize hardware ontop of software/OS.

[EGROWORLD]

I still think the RAGE engine is better for the games though)

[graFFizz]

the rag-doll physics are weird

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

One example is GTAIV.

Despite Rockstar being fairly Sony-centric, GTAIV looks AND runs better on the 360, which happens to be a very cpu heavy game.

[solidsnackumzzz]

@GEARSCOMBATANT1 any citations or benchmarks to back that wild claim shooter?

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

How is it a wild claim?

Anybody worth their salt knows that a Server CPU simply isnt as good or versatile as a general purpose processor, when it comes to handling on the fly calculations used in everyday apps and games...

Why do you think there's a such thing as SERVER AND General purpose processors?

The Server CPU is more specialized for handling large chunks of data and linear calculations, while the regular cpu can do all a server cpu can, and more. Just not as fast in some cases.

[solidsnackumzzz]

@GEARSCOMBATANT1 Wild in how the CELL first and foremost isnt just a server CPU, it was custom made, the SPE's handling intense number crunching and multi-tasking, the main core being of the more general purpose nature, and acting as a controller. Wild in how you claim a half baked intel core, or 360 cpu actually beats the cell. Benchmarks man, BENCHMARKS!

[chirlakato]

Well that's because many don't realize the CUSTOM-architecture involved in both PS3 and 360...namely the CPU's along with the GPU's. 360 features a CUSTOM IBM TRIPLE-CORE CPU at 3.2ghz on paper among many other things like their own cache/triple threads, etc while PS3 has an EIGHT-core CPU...and they are BOTH custom designed SOLEY for the cosoles unlike PC hardware which requires drivers and far more compatibility because it must run on a VARIETY of PC configurations ontop of many windows.

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

That's funny.... The PS3 has a SINGLE Core CPU with 7 other SPE's.

The SPE's individually are nowhere near as powerful or versatile as a single core cpu, why do you think they have SEVEN on the chip?

Each SPE is essentially designated to do one thing. A single SPE isnt made to multitask, so it's practically worthless unless you have them handling tasks the single core alone cant handle....

[chirlakato]

@GEARSCOMBATANT1

ONce again......... Consoles are NOT computers. You're right, they ARE NOT meant to "multi-task".... everything on the consoles (both the 360's triple-core CPU and PS3's EIGHT-core) are CUSTOM made to do ONE thing, and that's to dedicate all threads, power and instruction sets to gaming (and mostly aid in geometry/rendering on the PS3 because of it's 'weaker' GF71 chip). Stop comparing a console's architecture to a standard PC's design function with full OS's.

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

I know they're dedicated to gaming and media playback, but I'm talking about in game... The PS3 has a SINGLE CORE CPU with 7 functional SPE's.

Those SPE's arent able to multitask like a regular core in any cpu.

Meaning the SPE is only really able to handle one function at a time, like aiding in post processing by handling something like motion blur.

[luke246810]

I'm really glad crytek decided to develop an engine that would run on consoles. Once again judging by this video they've done an amazing job at producing an optimized engine that incorporates multiple advanced rendering effects whilst still delivering great performance. So far this engine seems to be on par with the pc version of cryengine 2 and considering the ageing GPU' present in the consoles, I think this is a great achievment, so kudos to crytek for that :)

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

The fact that it pushes a bit less than double the GFlops the Xenon does, is damn near irrelevant... The PS3's cell is essentially a server cpu, which isnt good for anything but crunching numbers... Any decent general purpose processor made in the last 3 years will shit all over the Cell processor, in any category...

[nar0001]

he says the its better on ps3 at the end of the video

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

Crysis is a GPU heavy game, NOT CPU.

If anything, they'd be able to squeeze more eye candy out of the CE3 with the 360, seeing as it has the better GPU...

The only thing the cell is really gonna help with is the physics, AI, and possibly particle effects..

Not to mention the Cell isnt THAT much better than the 360's Xenon processor to begin with anyway...

I highly doubt Crysis 2 will be much different from the first, so expect more on the 360.

[ShadowWulf14]

That's all fine, except Crytek said it actuallly WOULD look better on PS3

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

Devs say a lot of things... Dont believe what the devs say until the product is on the table.

[ShadowWulf14]

So I should trust you instead? right....

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

I never said to listen to ME... Anyone who knows ANYTHING about PC hardware would agree with me, at least on some level...

And you cant honestly tell me that devs dont lie... Most of em' lie through their asshole to make the end consumer support them..

[DarthXephron]

@GEARSCOMBATANT1

Umm do your research. The Cell is much much more powerful than the Xenon. Because I'll have you know that The Cell, all by its self ran Uncharted 2 and it's graphics without using the GPU. And let me know when your 360 can run at 218GFLOPS

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

Excuse me, but that's one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever read from a Playslave.

First of all, no game, on any platform beyond ancient PC games, runs solely on the processor. If that was the case, then Uncharted 2 could have been even more impressive(for a console game)... And with Sony putting so much into their first party games, UC2 would have been 'maxed' from the get-go.

Number two, the Cell is no where near as good as a general purpose processor at gaming applications...

[DarthXephron]

@GEARSCOMBATANT1

Yeah yeah yeah, dont get your panties in a bunch, we all know that you're a PC fanboy.

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

I'm no PC fanboy... I'm being what's called 'realistic'.

Anyone who knows anything about PC hardware will agree, regardless of bias... I like to play games across all platforms. It doesnt mean I'm gonna blow bullshit out my ass to please any community... I'm just tellin' it how it is.

[solidsnackumzzz]

@GEARSCOMBATANT1 which is why Crytek CEO Cevat Yerli, in this video mind you, says PC and PS3 physics are pretty much identical. You Fail

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

Actually, no.

A standard PC and 360 are almost identical architecture wise when it comes to the CPU, which is where physics is handled.

The PS3's cell on the otherhand is a backasswards server processor, which is much better at crunching pre-determined numbers rather than handling dynamic calculations that physics require.

Rather than going by word of mouth, look at the facts, and stop being so butthurt.

[solidsnackumzzz]

@GEARSCOMBATANT1 Lying isnt going to solve anything, neither is being ignorant. Why would Cervat Lie. Its not like physics is the games major selling point, so there'd be no reason to lie, as it would mean no gain for the company. Stop talking in theoretics, and face simply proven facts. For example, the 360 CPU is very weak and common.

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

Your entire argument is 'why would he lie, he cant profit from it'.

Holy shit you're fucking stupid.

Of course he can profit off of it... He's the dev, he's promiting the PS3, and any logical gamer who knows anything about hardware can see through this BS.

I'm not lying, I'm stating facts. You can babble all you want, but the fact of the matter is that these 'run of the mill' CPU's are much better at calculating real-time physics and AI changes....

[solidsnackumzzz]

God your an idiot. Lying CAN be profitable, i never said it wasn't, but if he lies about something that doesn't even arose public interest, what gain has he or the company made? Give me benchmarks, actually prove to me that run of the mill CPUs are any better

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

No, **you're** the idiot.

How about YOU do some research rather than me having to spell it out for you.

I gave you the info, you're the one who needs to disprove me.

[solidsnackumzzz]

@GEARSCOMBATANT1 Well in adult world when you make a claim, your supposed to back it up, not pass the buck.

[solidsnackumzzz]

@DarthXephron half true. There was a significant amount of the CPU present in the rendering process, more so than any regular game, but not 100%

[DarthXephron]

@solidsnackumzzz

Naughtydog said that they mostly used the rendering with the CPU.

[solidsnackumzzz]

@DarthXephron My point exactly, not all is CPU rendered

[SuperWierdShit]

ok actually think about an alien ware desk top i saw one it had 24 gig RAM no jokes costs a damn fortune though

[LOLTHATWASLAME]

Don't be stupid, you could probably save half the price of the Alienware desktop by building it yourself

Btw 6 gigs of ddr3 ram in dual channel mode is enough, you don't need 24 gigs of ram unless you got a server or something..

[thcman4]

what resolution is this being played at? the gun takes up a third of the screen.

[Melonade101]

Whoa my mouth dropped open at 4:56 holy crow! I guess it's nice to escape the jungle once and a while.

[Sunno94]

8:15 did he just say "all the pussy droll"?

[Ohmek]

pretty sure he said, "all the possible small details you see here".

[niero556]

crysis 2 will be look best on pc but ps3 is better tahn xbox 360

[N173]

Too glitchy right now, but I hope for the best.

[secuda1]

I hope they can sell this engine to some companies so we can get some nice looking games this gen :)

[JEFFERYNOTHING]

It costs 3,000,000 to use. Good luck with that.

[secuda1]

well EA could buy it and make a decent looking FIFA game for once.

[JEFFERYNOTHING]

Personally I hope Bethesda uses it in order to make the ultimate Elder Scrolls game. Could you imagine the next Elder Scrolls, or the next Fallout using Cryengine 3? It would be insane!

[secuda1]

that would be awesome, we have already seeing those castle pictures from the former game, also i am not a big fan of sports fan.

i think they are just showing off to se what envoriment they can use this engine is (no shit) and it looks pretty amazing, i was skeptical first when they was going to release it on console but it looks fine to me.

[SuperWierdShit]

oh FUCK yes! that would be my dream come true! i was about to post a comment saying exactly the same thing just a imagine a massive RPG on this engine...OMG! lol

[Irishfreedom]

They should release this tech demo to the public. It would be far more effective at showing off their engine if we all actually got a chance to try it out.

[theman2481]

thats right ps3 all day and if u want a game to look this good blu-ray=50g mem to handle these sick graphics longer gameplay and full 1080p res unlike stupid dvd discs with 8.5g that scratch and break all day:( like my halo3

[AnnoyedDragon]

Disk storage has little to nothing to do with graphical quality and resolution...

[falubii]

True, but I think he meant you can store more on the disk which means more game content. It's not like it matters though because the PS3 couldn't play it.

[theman2481]

exactly but u can also keep those nice graphics without having to slightly downgrade em if u dont have enough space for ur game content. wait what do u mean ps3 couldnt play it?

[AnnoyedDragon]

Content quality is only limited by storage space in extreme circumstances. Seeing how the most technically advanced game today doesn't even fill a single DVD; we are still a while from that happening.

I can only think of one game that is DVD restricted today and that is Rage, one game is hardly a justification of the technology.

We are far far much limited by hardware performance and development costs than disk storage right now. Blu-ray will be important next generation, but not right now.

[theman2481]

i guess but it doesnt hurt to have 50g of mem and able to get full 1080p res but ture i know what you mean like crysis which had awesome graphics.

[AnnoyedDragon]

"it doesnt hurt to have 50g of mem and able to get full 1080p res"

Again storage has nothing to do with the render resolution of a game, storage is only relevant to the resolution of video.

[theman2481]

"Again storage has nothing to do with the render resolution of a game, storage is only relevant to the resolution of video."

again it still doesnt hurt to have it i never said anything about what u just said in the previous comment all i said it doesnt hurt to have that for this gen and next gen.......

[jackalarrr]

He runs to damn slow

[ShadowWulf14]

He's not really running, whenever he moves at all he puts the gun down like that

[0nemest0]

maximum speed...

[RandyWells89]

CRYSIS 2 coming next year

[mognovox]

what game was that for?

[metimehmet]

when this game coming on ps3?!

[Marrilliams]

I agree I cant wait for this to come out for the ps3 Ill probably be buying it day 01 :D

[jdcruzseen430]

low fps

[thelasthallow]

look at the Xbox 360. it has low FPS. you can see it lagging pretty good in nearly all the videos.

This TECH Demo did not lagg at all. there were no low FPS. anything you seen where it was stuttering was it simply loading. thats it.

[JEFFERYNOTHING]

We also all know that crysis 2 will sell more on the consoles due to piracy on the PC. HENCE CRYSIS FOR CONSOLES.

[AnnoyedDragon]

By that very same rational consoles have a very serious piracy problem, why else would the majority of console games end up on PC and other consoles?

It's called increasing your returns by broadening your audience, it has nothing to do with piracy.

The vast majority of console games are cross platform, not because of piracy; but because developers can get more money that way.

[JEFFERYNOTHING]

But what I am getting at here is a game like Crysis was never meant for consoles. It was either made for consoles to A. Show off Cryengine 3, B. Get more sales for the Crysis Franchise. C. Both A and B.

Really (due to Crysis not going to the Wii for obvious reasons) Crysis 2 can only be pirated on 1 console. The 360. The Ps3 has not even had its security cracked yet, and even if it had, BDs are expensive. Piracy is no where as near spread on consoles (The 360) as it is PC.

[AnnoyedDragon]

Crysis sold 1.5 million copies on PC and counting.

Crytek has enough money to buy Free Radical, upgrade CryEngine 2 into 3, develop Crysis 2 on three platforms and even develop then discard another game during all this.

Their activities are evidence that they made a more than sufficient return from Crysis on PC. Piracy is no more a factor in them going cross platform as any other developer that has gone cross platform this generation; regardless of platform they started on.

[JEFFERYNOTHING]

You have valid points, but all I am really trying to get out here is that Crysis 2 is unnecessary for consoles and will be nothing more than an expensive tech demo for the consoles. (An expensive tech demo that I will buy) Piracy is still much more rampant on the PC than the console, though I do understand what you are saying.

[richy123xd]

Wait, did he say the end of september is when its gonna launch?

[wrestler07ma]

I think he said Cryengine 3 will be released to developers. Not Crysis 2.

[richy123xd]

oh ok..

[001blackwing]

ok i am sorry for my last comment, it's actually very nice, i was wrong to say that, just console fans piss me off when they think cryteck is making this release for console and pc so they can finally make some money. Fuck You Pc Rules Forever

[LizzyAston]

in the fantasy world you can see that the raindrops on the water have a short draw-distance

but how the hell they managed to get this on the PS3 is beyond me

[theman2481]

@LizzyAston

the cell processore im guessing

[BuffaStuffa18]

Pubelicious can suck a dick!

[pubelicious15]

I fucking hate consoles, first they steal the Call of Duty series from us now Crysis. This better not turn out to be a watered down version of CryEngine 2, at least not the PC version, if it is I will be extremely dissapointed.

Off Topic: Does anyone know how many copies Crysis and Crysis: Warhead sold?

[JuvenileErmine]

most of the people watching this video know that crysis 2 was going to consoles and knew it about 2 years ago enough with the crying it will still be on pcs and will have more options along with AA and higher resolutions than 1280x720 really its gonna be on consoles just so they can say we did it and maxed the consoles and of corse pirating crytek has always been a quality PC dev i doubt very much that they would leave the PC out on one of the most anticipated games of the year

[R3APERvsTYETREE]

You can play consoles on a pc monitor. I have my 360 set up to my monitor and i t runs at 1680x1050, it looks so much better than on my 37inc hd tv.

Pc will always have more horse power but you would be suprised how niuc some console games can look at 1680x1050. This game is on all platforms and crytek have said the pc will have all the features we have come to expect and im sure it will be dx11 to.

[SuperWierdShit]

heard of the cell prosesor in the PS3? it apparently has the best (raw) prosesing power in the world no jokes read up on it like way better then an intel quad extreme! now i don't fully understand DX whats it there for? link me a vid or somthing to explain it to me plz lol sozz for the incompetence

[GEARSCOMBATANT1]

Except No.

[001blackwing]

approx 1.5 million for the original

and about the same for warhead, though that is very disappointing, i have to admit because of piracy, they estimated 15-20 copies downloaded for free per 1 copy purchase :( :( Fuckin thieves

[DeadFredVideo]

Wow, looks bloody fantastic! I'm really glad that developers are finally taxing the PS3, this shows what the cell can really do! Enough of the whining "it's a difficult platform wah wah" :)

I hate Crysis but i might just have to buy Crysis 2 just to see how the final product looks :)

Good job crytek!

[lordgeorgemaster]

hmm very interesting looking forward to crysis 2 with this engine, pc all the way consoles will never play games lik this, dont get me wrong my ps3 is great but cryengine 3 will be a much greater experience on pc , so looking forward to what sort of rig's guys have to build to run this hmmm. sweet vid man

[popothecatathome]

5/5 nice job man

[001blackwing]

look how shitty the explosions are, this is so watered down man

[R3APERvsTYETREE]

Maybe but you will never see a better engine on the current gen consoles.

This will set the standard to how games shoud look, like crysis did for pc and since then nothing has came close, lots of promise but only constant dissapointment.

[asilayloathing]

Actually, although i prefere FPS's on the PC... I'm glad it's coming to the consoles... It will drive away those idiots makin COD games... coz it'll show how inferior COD games are and how theyre just after makin money.

Love Crysis and Crytek :)

[jakass505]

if its this bad on pc then im not getting it

[Hikayuhuy]

also , the reason why he's comparing the ps3's and pc's graphic is because cryengine 3 has been downgraded a bit due to the performance of cryengine 2 . cryengine 2 , technically, is the most beautiful and advance engine right now . but at the same time , it require some massive calculating power . and that's why in cryngine 3 , they have to downgrade some of the detail . watch the vid posted by reaper that compare cryegngine 2 and 3 . the console version will always lack AA , ... always .

[ownTer]

All you kids crying about lag and what not. Give them a break. Its not as if its releasing tomorrow. All games lag in early stage's. So just pipe down a bit boys and girls. It still looks pretty good. But nothing compared to PC.

[consumev]

there's not much they can do about low fps on a console, other than lower the amount of shaders = shitty graphics

[R3APERvsTYETREE]

Plus they mentioned last year that is only being devolped on these paltforms but is aimed at the next gen consoles.

Not only that when crysis came out, every pc on the planet got lag.

I also wonder why he never used speed run, well i already know the answer to that. I guess he was told to make only slow small movements to minimise what lag we see. Still when this ships it will be amazing.

[GraficOctane]

he keeps comparing it to the pc engine...PS3 ENGINE WILL NEVER BE AS GOOD AS THE PC ENGINE...not until you up the specs of the ps3 drastically. The physics is not as accurate either

[tiagom135]

lag

[chocolate45689]

the pc engine will always be the best

[druidkg]

nice

[DANINEN]

sick!

[lorecan]

is it me or is it laggin a bit

[kc9mav]

No its lagging.

[CRAKIZGOOD]

its strange that a 7900 (RSX) can play crysis

but lol its gona be at 720p (1024x720)

most of pc gamers are gona be playing it at 1920x1200 since its gona be extremely optimized

i say its gona run great with a gtx 260 or a low end sli system

[Rune101rune]

I thought the PS3 rendered in 1280x720?

[CRAKIZGOOD]

well 90% of it games are 720p

10% are 1080p

thats what u get from an extremely outdated gpu

[Rune101rune]

7900 wasn't that bad back in '05 but yea its shit now

[chambs1]

The Radeon X1900XTX was better. I remember that.

[firestormcomputers]

Hell yeah.

[hudders123]

cant w8

[asalistics]

damn lets not fight over what system its coming for, you pc gamer will get it anyways so dont worry and peace

[brandtproduction]

i should be a pc game!

[brandtproduction]

it*

[masterchiefx2]

they have to go onto consoles dont they idiots

[onoff314]

They do want to make money...

[Hyourin0584]

if you could link to the original IGN video...

[RoryM07]

very nice :)

[staticxmako]

fucking shit, same thing as all the other shit games they made

didnt get warhead, only got the first, fuck them they are sellouts

[liascm]

you only say that cause your shitty ass pentium cant run it ;)

[staticxmako]

you mean my phenom 9950, at 3.2ghz and HD4850, 4 gigs ddr2 800, k9a2 plat, raptor x, cm stacker 830 evo, 500w psu,

or my other pc,

amd opteron 185 @3.0ghz, HD3650 2gigs ocz plat, abit at8 32x 160wd 72krpm, 500w psu, antec 900moded by me to be a 902,

if i want graphics i go ride my CRF250r dirt bike that cost 4 grand, or my soon to be 30k truck, BITCH

[CRAKIZGOOD]

what the

u have a 30k truck

how did u get soo much money :|

[staticxmako]

soon to be

i said

gota pay off my dirt bike, and then comes 30k out of my pocket

[CRAKIZGOOD]

or

build a 30k system :O

[liascm]

still a pretty shit system, especially the GPU

[EdGeyy]

willy wave much?