First couple of times thru I noticed a big difference in added expression, re: your new recorder. I have to download and save videos because I am on dial-up. On successive playing a don't notice the extra expression as vividly. My tech seemed to have an explanation which I could not possibly re-iterate! LOL Anyway, it is quite a successful composition, rendition and video. I like the piece very much. Only thing I don't like is the name! :-)
Some weird things going on with the stereo spectrum... the conversion before upload to YouTube has it too. I might have to keep the AAC down to 44.1kHz instead of the 48 kHz it's at now, and see what that does. But it's well past bed time now. I've spent all night trying to get this looking and sounding right. Never thought a new camera would pose so much trouble when the old one's videos worked perfectly, albeit at a low quality.
At least so far the AAC audio, although encoded at the same bitrate as the original, doesn't seem to be full of static like it was when uploaded in the original AC3 format. But of course the video isn't finished processing as I write this... so YouTube still has time to mess it up.
Lowered the bitrate of the video to try to get rid of some of the jaggies. Ideally I'd like to figure out what codec to use that would eliminate those jaggies altogether. They're not present in the original MPEG-2 video.
hi where i can find sheet music from this song
peruanadaz 1 year ago
@peruanadaz I made a score for it but you should ask Natalia if you can have a copy. Her YouTube account is "myslnat1".
Keeper1st 1 year ago
Do you ever drum/ tap your fingers on your camcorder whilst recording?
MisterMulluc 1 year ago
No, but I did hit the camera with a kazoo in a video of Good Gravy Rag, where there's a break in the music.
Keeper1st 1 year ago
I've watched this so many times, well done for spotting the original
MisterMulluc 2 years ago
First couple of times thru I noticed a big difference in added expression, re: your new recorder. I have to download and save videos because I am on dial-up. On successive playing a don't notice the extra expression as vividly. My tech seemed to have an explanation which I could not possibly re-iterate! LOL Anyway, it is quite a successful composition, rendition and video. I like the piece very much. Only thing I don't like is the name! :-)
TheKnabe 2 years ago
Good job once again :)
mariokartrainbowroad 2 years ago
This is great!
AceWissle 2 years ago
Nice! "Dancing Tones" is a really nice rag. It's posted on the Authentic Ragtime website.
ragtimebuddy 2 years ago
Flawless! It's Like Night And Day From The Earlier Upload! Fantastic *****!
skyman2002 2 years ago
Some weird things going on with the stereo spectrum... the conversion before upload to YouTube has it too. I might have to keep the AAC down to 44.1kHz instead of the 48 kHz it's at now, and see what that does. But it's well past bed time now. I've spent all night trying to get this looking and sounding right. Never thought a new camera would pose so much trouble when the old one's videos worked perfectly, albeit at a low quality.
Keeper1st 2 years ago
At least so far the AAC audio, although encoded at the same bitrate as the original, doesn't seem to be full of static like it was when uploaded in the original AC3 format. But of course the video isn't finished processing as I write this... so YouTube still has time to mess it up.
Keeper1st 2 years ago
Lowered the bitrate of the video to try to get rid of some of the jaggies. Ideally I'd like to figure out what codec to use that would eliminate those jaggies altogether. They're not present in the original MPEG-2 video.
Keeper1st 2 years ago