I want you all to keep in mind that Molotov Mitchell is a genius,which isn't a bad thing unless he uses his genius to manipulate people who are dumber than he.Molotov fails to mention that the KKK and all those who opposed the civil rights act in 1964 all switched to the GOP. Its shameful and offensive imply that MLK supported republican ideas. MLK was a progressives. Jesus believed that the rich should pay more in taxes.
And as for the socialist line, what has Obama done that is socialist?
@LiberalMediaBiasBlog Yeah, because that is what Jesus was all about... forcing people who make more money to pay more in taxes. Its called freedom of choice, genius. Its a stupid thing to try and pin racism on either party when both are guilty. And if you can't figure out one thing that Obama has done that indicates his staunch belief in socialism, redistributionist, Keynesian economic leanings, then you are danger to society and should have yourself spade or neutered .
@jdm11060 All I did was point out few things that Mitchell left out. I never said anyone was racist, I think its insulting for him to juxtapose Progressives who were republicans when the party was progressive with right wing extremist. And as for Jesus, I believe he taught his followers to help the sick and the poor. I never brought up racism in the party but you did and then used the term "Kenynesian economic learnings" and said that i should be neutered for not realizing it. Hmm......
@jdm11060 I challenge you to name one thing socialist that Obama has done, that hadn't been proposed by a republican first. They way the right twist peoples word and actions like you did with my statement is shameful and the reason why the country is going to shit. People like this guy, Beck, and Palin are so far off in lala land that they won't compromise with anyone. They twist everything the to be seen as socialism and then they scare there followers by telling them every1 else is dishonest.
@LiberalMediaBiasBlog HA! You think I'm in the bag for the GOP? Again your incredible ignorance is on display. I detest what Republicans have become. But Democrats are the same way. Our entire system has gone socialist. If you can't see that taking sides of either Republicans or Democrats is woefully dangerous to what our founders and Constitution has originally designed, than I would like to refer you back to the end of my original reply with a greater sense of urgency.
@jdm11060 You are obviously right wing and watch Fox news way to much. The people who wrote the constitution knew that it would need to change with the times and that is why they gave us the option to change it. You obviously don't like progress and would like to bring the country back to how it was before 1860. Just b/c u hate the US it doesn't mean the US is wrong, it means u r. I don't expect you to come up with an intelligent response so don't worry, you can just keep name calling
@ScottStedford14 Explaining this to people is getting tiresome. They used the label "Socialist" in a time of national depression to get all the unions and labourers on there side. After being voted into power and fixing the economy Hitler disbanded all the unions and made any kind of club or society illegal. Finally he pretty much out right banned Marxism and blamed it on the Jew conspiracy.
Benito Mussolini was a socialist, but he rejected the ideology because of its internationalist bent. To fascists (including the Nazis), socialists were more loyal to the international working class than they were to their own nation - they were disloyal, in other words. Furthermore, the Nazi Party intentionally co-opted the Social Democrats' rhetoric and organizational style to create a right-wing mass political party. They called themselves socialists, but that was part of the strategy.
FAIL EPIC HISTORY FAIL. Hitler was not a socialist; he actually thought that Marxism was part of an international Jewish conspiracy to control the world. That's why it was called the *national* socialist party - socialists view society in terms of class, whereas fascists view it in terms of nationalism. Hitler immediately threw the Social Democrats (socialists) and KPD (Communists) into concentration camps upon coming into power.
The arguments that right wing extremist started as Democrats are completely flawed. Back then, the Democratic party WAS the conservative party, and the Republicans were the liberals. The shift started with the New Deal in the 1930s. So please, we know that a Republican freed the slaves. But guess what? Lincoln would be a Democrat today.
@trifonovg1 Actually, conservatives are liberals, those currently known as liberals are progressives or socialists or fascists, and libertarians are radical liberals. The Republican Party was part progressive, part conservative, and was literally just the "anti-slavery" party at its inception. The Democratic Party was also conservative at the time, just pro-slavery. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive Democrat and a segregationist. Racism was not tied to classical liberalism, but to the party.
@n0t0mega Are you perhaps familiar with the 25 point Nazi platform? You can classify each point as nationalist, socialist, or racist. The only way to claim that the Nazis were to the right of the spectrum would be to say either:
1. Nationalism makes them to the right therefore being on the left requires that a party is of the sort who favors globalism over national interests. Or
2. They are to the right because they are racist.
It's a lose-lose proposition. They were socialist racists.
@n0t0mega I didn't say the overall state of the country. It takes time to socialize a country. I said the Nazis. Besides corporatism was an ideology of the SPD. You know the party that opposed the Nazis right up until the last free elections.
It's OK. I won't call you despicable for your ignorance. I will just assume that you are a product of your American public school education system. How else could you be deluded enough to argue with a German expat about my own history?
@n0t0mega They persecuted the Socialist Democrat Party because they opposed them. Not because they were socialist. The communist party was suppressed following the Reichstag fire. I cannot make it clear enough how foolish or indoctrinated you are.
A German citizen who had to study this for years in school has taken the time to correct your grievous error claiming something that is clear even by what you call them in English. I have never encountered this level of idiocy in my life.
@n0t0mega actually, you're technically right. National socialism is Fascism (thus why Hitler and Mussolini considered eachother to be "brothers"). But what is Fascism? Fascism is what happens when you take big-government social engineers and give them authoritarian control over the economy -- making "National Socialist" a fairly accurate term despite them not actually being socialist.
What is interesting to note is that before coming up with Fascism, Mussolini was a member of the Socialist Party
@n0t0mega but still, they persecuted socialists and communists for political reasons (they were their biggest political opponents), not because they disagreed terribly on economic matters.
Both are ill-conceived economic totalitarians. Both wind up being horrible for the citizenry (look at the oppression of bureaucratic socialist USSR and China).
@n0t0mega they really didn't. It's more like the progressivism of the right caught on in the left. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive as well as a segregationist. Martin Luther King wasn't just a Republican, he was a member of the religious far right, and he saw some degree of hope for black men in the free enterprise system; just as soon as they could be judged by the same standard as white men. The Jim Crow laws are perfect examples of un-conservative racism.
Many of these facts are misrepresented or simply wrong. The origin of the Republican Christian Right started with the Southern Democrat opposition to the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960's. That was when they changed sides in the Nixon era and the GOP has been marching to their tune ever since.
The Nazis were on the far right wing because of economic policies that encouraged heavy corporatism and private ownership. The majority of the founding fathers were in fact deist or had no belief.
@lamorte42 Fascism (corporatism) is not far-right policy, it is far-left policy, reserved for those dissatisfied with free market conditions but too cowardly to attempt true socialism.
@n0t0mega Historically correct, not a moron. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive Democrat, a segregationist (he thought that blacks would give whites VD), and also our first overtly corporatist president (see the Federal Reserve).
I loved the whole pause to apologize to home schoolers XD
but I must say, I was lucky enough to have a great US History teacher that didn't censor much of anything. He made it clear that those people were republican and that the democratic party was originally for slavery. I love your videos, they are very informative! Thank you for caring enough to post these things :)
I think we should take that list and start checking up anyone that is not decribed by it. Of course I would say that cause every one of those items on the check list decribes me.
Wow way to spin the right wing agenda. Here I was basing my thoughts on right wingers on their current stances and agendas. When I should have been basing it on right wing philosophies from 100 yrs ago. Thanks for clearing that up I always knew jesus would promote no healthcare without payment. *sigh*
actually u should even look at whats racist....notice that white colonisation bad...and non white colonisation good? we have been so conditioned about the word racist that it immediately polorizes crackers while they are walked on in the same instance.
and did you know that Hitler had the traditional socialists in the NAZI's killed, and that the German resistance was communist. and that when Hitler said socialist he meant that the fruits of slave labor (the undesirables that didn't get gassed) should be shared with the whites. and that Marx was an abolitionist, and antiracist.
@Mark123USA i honestly don't care, only right wing antifreedom nutters care. we have freedom of religion for a reason. only your own worship can lead to god no religion can.
@Mark123USA no the left and the right have both yeilded up a wide range of heroes:
the left has heroes marx (idealist but he was trying to help an oppressed group), king, lincoln, bakunin, proudhon, the international brigades, the anarcho-communists of catalonia, joe hill, the miners of west virgina
it has villians stalin, lenin, mao, trotsky, the red army faction, the PIRA, the bombers of the 1900's
the right has heroes: theuro, twain, the saint Patrick's battalion.
okay, the populist party made the dems into nonracists. and the reps became racist later. and not all homeschooled people are cons, my freind is liberal and was homeschooled. also i am an anarchist, and i go to a democratic school.
@FREEAMERICANOW69 Did you not know the NIV is also published by the same company to publishes the satanic bible? You should do your research before quoting that filth. Don't let yourself be deceived so easily.
hey retard, do you know that publishers are in a business to make money and they have the right to publish anything that's legal, and that judeo-christian god is myth and historical evidence proves it?
watch :3.3.3 Atheism: A History of God (Part 1)
Evid3nc3
so since i got history on my side, it's you who are being deceived.
"Nazi is an abbreviated word for 'National Socialist'"
True enough, but socialism doesn't just come bundled together with socialism. Nationalism is nearly synonymous with right-wing politics, emphasizing the feverish disdain of foreign influences, non-native cultural practices, the deification of the military, and the distillation of ethnic, gender, sexual, and religious persuasions into the credentials for hierarchy.
Nationalism has NOTHING inherently to do with socialism.
it's clear that he doesn't know what the word, extremist is or that they, right-wing extremists are willing to kill for their beliefs, even though they won't test their beliefs to make sure they're right and doesn't care that other people doesn't care in their beliefs at all.
just like people who killed abortionists because they claimed that their bible, gives them the right to do it...but the bible supports abortion, genocide, infanticide, murder and slavery.
and how many millions did christians kill and are killing now?
the human parasitic fetus has no right to life and a woman shouldn't be forced into keeping an unwanted pregnancy and have her body, life and future ruined because ppl like u hate abortion.
the bible supported abortion. the footnote from NIV 1984 footnote from numbers 5:11-31 said:
"Numbers 5:21 Or causes you to have a miscarrying womb and barrenness"
@FREEAMERICANOW69 Hey moron, that verse is a punishment for accidentally causing a miscarriage. What do you think God's thought's are on deliberate abortion? Since when is a baby a parasite? I suppose you think the same of unborn eagles right? You are just too stupid. Really.
hey retard, that verse is a ruse for an abortion and the 1984 NIV footnote proves it.
"Numbers 5:21 Or causes you to have a miscarrying womb and barrenness"
to CAUSE a miscarrying womb IS an abortion.
prove that your god is real, even though historical evidence proves he's not...so the writers of your myth had no problem with abortion, since they supported infanticide.
when did i say a baby was a parasite? never...i said a fetus is parasite and symbiosis proves it.
If you sit home waiting your turn you deserve to have your gun taken from your cold dead hands.
The Founders didn’t wait for the Brits to knock down their doors. They gathered at the green and stood up like men and they killed government employees all the way back to Boston.
What will you do when it’s time to hunt NWO hacks, republicrats and commies(“Liberals” and ‘progressives’)?
Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first.
i love when they say "drrr Hitler was a leftist because Nazi means "National Socialist." Hm, well I guess North Korea is a thriving constitutional republic, a democracy, because North Korea is called "the Democratic Republic of North Korea." Socialism was all the rage when the Nazis came on the scene, they used the term, but were: Nationalists, socialists are Internationalists. They BANNED socialist/communist literature, etc. etc. etc.
After the Civil Rights Movement, the "racist inbred Democrats" switched to the GOP. And National Socialism was a form of fascism, an extreme right wing position. Just saying these things for the record, 'cause the illuminative record is very, very wrong.
Just because you're a member of the Democratic Party doesn't make you a person from the left. Those old school southern Democrats wouldn't agree with almost all of what the Democratic Party stands for today. On the other side Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican, but he has been noted to of said things in support of Democratic Socialism. Furthermore, the ideology of the Nazi Party was facsism; fascism is very complicated because it is composed of anti-capitalist and anti-marxist views. Learn
@CreekSalt Exacttly, This guy is making it seem like Hitler was a socialist when he actually killed communists. Nazis hated communism and liked fascism. But If Molotov actually read about what kind of government the nazi's were trying to propose was not socialism. The nazis hid behind the nam,e because no one wants to join a fascism party.
Republicans today are not republicans. They haven't been for at least 30 years. They used to be conservatives, now they're just neo-conservatives. It used to be about the economy, now it's a crowd of petty little bastards who waste the spotlight fighting over abortion, religion, marriage and gun rights.
As far as my views, I am a Libertarian. Libertarinism = True Conservatism. Read the following if you really want to know: conservativeforchange (dot) com / 2009 / 05 / what-true-conservatism-really-is (dot) html
Hey, what a twist! I'm a Libertarian too, and I don't just believe the bullshit that people who lie and lable themselves with that lable spew out; not because they have a pretty website, and not because they claim purity.
a true libertarian stands for the most rights possible, meaning the complete left-most political view point possible where eveyone is in charge of government and the betterment of our country. I'm afraid we ARE our brother's keeper.
@LuminousTruth, I agree Libertarians do believe people should be in complete control of our government, as well as our lives, but that's not the case is it? You are right we share some views with Liberals, but we also share some with Conservatives. Liberals hold the belief that only government can guarantee social justice, and seek an increase in government, taxes, and regulation. That's socialism, and I know of no Libertarians who call themselves left-wing. We're somewhere in the middle.
Liberals belief that government (since we elect it and it is supposed to be responsible to us) is the best safest but not the only entity that can guarantee social justice.
Conservatives also believe this, hence no privatization of the Judicial branch.
Liberals seek to strenghen our government/country by increasing in capabilities, it's income, and it's regulation. that's not socialism. Conservatives do this also. I'm progresive libertarian
@LuminousTruth, and therein lies the rub. Progressive I am not. That ideology is naive because it completely ignores the nature of mankind. Mankind will never "progress" beyond it's nature - there will always be those who are born to do evil in the world. There is no way around that (that's biology), so it's fallacy to ever seek absolute control. Absolute control corrupts absolutely. By the way, government control is socialism. Do look that up. Libertarianism is individual liberty.
@dementeddc Libertarians also wants to get rid of the minimum wage. As if getting by on $7.50 an hour was bad enough. They argue that by doing this it helps the economy and lowers unemployment. Sure more people will be employed, but for steadily decreasing wages. America will turn into a sweatshop economy.
Libertarians don't care about the common good. Liberty is more important than the community. Why should a libertarian with a nice job care that everyone else works for a dollar a day?
@samisyosam, left unchecked you may be right but no one is proposing totally eliminating common sense, only that government shouldn't be the one deciding that issue. 1st off, wages should be left to the people, their employers, and the state in which they live in (if not their local communities). Why? Because conditions vary across the country. A one-sized fits all approach doesn't work.
@samisyosam, 2nd this country needs to reform society and business. Many people have lost all sense of integrity and personal responsibility. If we don't want religion taught in schools, we should come up with an alternative to teach values of right and wrong to our children. Also, it's possible to build employee representation into the business structure, without paying dues to a faceless union with it's own agenda. Many modern businesses do that.
@samisyosam, Libertarians most certainly do care about others, only it's up to US to make society better, not the government. Government ruins everything it touches. If you honestly care about workers, health care, or anything else then do something about it in your local community. The only thing you're doing by placing that in the hands of DC is making the politicians rich and giving them power, while they laugh at your suffering. Do wake up.
@dementeddc Right. Eeeverything it has ever touched has been ruined. Like those roads you walk on, the commodities like gas, food and paint without heavy metals in them (damn those bastards! lead was cheaper to use!), the national forests that aren't clear-cut wastes, damn regulations!
Our country is falling into disrepair because it's been mis-managed. Don't blame the government model just because some idiots are behind the wheel. Call them out on it, show the people. Make integrity a habit.
@LuminousTruth, you're also wrong about Libertarianism being leftmost on the political scale. Again, that dichotomy is misunderstood. Left-wing means complete government control, right-wing means no government control. Why do you think Ron Paul and Gary Johnson are running as Republicans? Because the one thing we have in common with them is the sense of small government, nothing more. Liberals haven't believed in that concept since JFK, otherwise I would be supporting them.
The dichotomy of left vs. right is completely false as most of you seem to understand it. Left wing would be complete government control, whereas right wing would be complete anarchy and no government. This is the true scale to judge ideology. Fascism in all forms is left wing. Evangelicals were Democrats until the election of Ronald Reagan, but after the election of Clinton returned to the left. Take Westboro Baptist or Terry Jones for example - both are registered Democrat supporters.
Complete Government control is the sense of a true democracy, where EVERYONE is involved in all of government in a perfect way, with the most rights possible, meaning all rights which don't affect other's rights. Fascism is an Authoritarian stance, and has more to do with conservatism than with "government control of everything". conservatism in NOT anarchism. your over simplifications show that your mind is overly simple. which makes you a conservative republican.
@LuminousTruth, the following is a direct quote from Hitler's Secret Conversations (1953): National Socialism and religion cannot exist together. The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity...
(quote continued) Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things. (p 6 & 7) . Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure. (p 43) The reason why the ancient world was so pure, light and serene was that it knew nothing of the two great scourges: the pox and Christianity.
O.k. and The Bible says that the writer of a particular verse says that Jesus said that he came to bring fire to our world and to divide people amongst eachother and against peace. not a very noble or good thing if you ask me. What's your point in quoting Hitler's book? that he believed in evolution and stopped being Catholic and didn't want to become Lutheran/protestant? That really just shows a failure on the part of Catholics and protestants. are you saying Hitler was a muslim?
@LuminousTruth, no, as I pointed out Hitler was an atheist who used religion to achieve his goals. His obsession with the occult is well documented - he searched the world for artifacts contained in myths because he sought their power. Strange, but true. Luckily they were just stories. It's funny you mention muslims, though. Hitler met with the muslim brotherhood in the 1930's. In fact, he made them part of the SS in the middle east because of their shared hatred of jews.
no clearly he was a secret muslim. did he ever say "Islam is the most vile religion, used by Jews to enslave us"? no. and so it's save to jump to the conclusion that he was a secret muslim. Did hitler kill atheists in the gas chambers? hell no, never! at least I never heard he did (he did). atheists aren't obsessed with the occult, in fact, most atheists are naturalists who don't believe in magic. If Hitler was an atheist he was definately NOT a "militant/fundamentalist" atheist..
@LuminousTruth, now you're making no sense. Hitler did not believe in occult lore, simply the idea that these myths may have been based on some truth that was misinterpreted by savages (again, his own words). He did not subscribe to any established religious view outside of his childhood. He was a evil, insane bastard concerned only with his own ego and greatness. What exactly are you trying to imply?
Such brutal dishonesty... talking about what Democrats were like 100 years ago.
Times have changed, mate. I can show you 1000 KKK members who vote Republican for every 1 you can show voting Democrat. (If you could actually find one, that is...)
@fearguis, you offer nothing but baseless claims. I, on the other hand, offer ongoing policies by the Progressive left intended to harm my people and wipe us from the face of this country. The myth that the left abandoned these policies after Civil rights is only accepted by those reared on revisionist history. I dare you to watch some of the clips on my channel if you're so secure in your worldview.
@dementeddc Baseless claims? I said that the majority of KKK members vote Republican. That is hardly baseless. :) Perhaps you meant to respond to someone else?
@fearguis, throwing out that claim is baseless. Where is your proof? Thomas Robb, director of The Knights Party (the modern klan), endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2008. To be fair, they did say they would consider voting for McCain if Obama won the nomination. A 2009 legal case (State of Nebraska vs. Robert Henderson), confirmed the Knights Party is essentially the same organization as the KKK, retaining the same framework and political ties originally established by the Democrat Party.
In 1992, the KKK in Arkansas endorsed William J. Clinton, but withdrew that endorsement when the media starting touting Clinton as the 1st "black" president. Similiar "white pride" groups in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Texas, Alabama, Texas, and Mississippi have endorsed Democrat candidates as well up until the election of Obama. Since then, these groups have been seeking to create an alternative party representing their values (platforms can be found on their sites).
@dementeddc If any of that were true, you might have a point. Dude, don't even attempt to convince anyone that white supremacists are not overwhelmingly Republican. You know they are as well I do. You can support the Republicans if you want, they represent plenty of different things, and they are not all white supremacists. But saying that white supremacists vote Democrat would only be fitting as a headline on The Onion.
@fearguis, it is true and they do, however understand they have their own agenda. I am not saying that I support Republicans. See the post I just put. There are racists on both sides of the aisle, and I see that as more of a generational issue than an ideological one. However, the racists that have infiltrated the left have intentionally used government policy to harm us minorities. That is fact. One could argue that the GOP has done the same, but it's not as obvious.
@fearguis, personally I hate both parties, and would welcome a system where we have neither. The biggest point I have been trying to make is that rich elites control BOTH parties, and are responsible for most of the ills we have faced and will face. That's not to say there aren't "normal" people who run for office, but take a look at who usually wins. It's the same suspects. Traditionally, people out these kind of politicians by labelling them as "progressives" (on both sides of the aisle).
But... but "Nazi" mean NATIONAL socialist. By your warped logic, that means American patriots are Nazis too. That means the founding fathers you love to worship have more in common with Hitler than anything and if you love America and take pride in your nation, you're a nazi. By your definiton, Molotov.
Not mention Hitler was a rabid homophobe, and advocated killing them too... Kind of sounds like the "Kill the Gays" bill you supported in Uganda, Molotov. If anything, you have more in common with Hitler than anyone else. Please... you say Obama has more in common with Hitler than Reagan or Bush? He wouldn't even be alive for long in that regime, as Hitler hated black people. Hitler invaded small countries to satisfy the arms-titans in Germany, which sounds very similar to...
Yeah, talk about only putting in facts that support your twisted world-view in this video, or changing them so they do. I can't stand 95% percent of conservative bullshit like this. If you don't like the facts, change them. Hitler advocated the destruction of trade unions and was vehemently anticommunist. He sent communists to concentration camps even before the Jews. He was as right-wing as right-wing gets, which is why we should be careful.
The National Socialists German Workers' Party (Nazi's) advocated the welfare state, worker's rights, railed against capitalism (the Weimar Republic was a Captialist Democracy), and forwarded the notion that government is better suited to running people's lives than they are. Sound familiar? By the way, Hitler was also an atheist (filled German churches with SS, not pastors), and persecuted Jews because he hated religion (read his own words). If you support these things, you're the fascist.
@valkhorn, yes he was. Hitler was raised christian, but was atheist when he took control of the Nazi party. In Mein Kamf he states how much he hated religion and the church and wanted to see it erased from the world, yet he recognized the church could convince the populace to commit deeds they would normally be against. He got this idea from America, where churches were used to justify the enslavement of blacks and eastern europeans and the eradication of native Americans.
Have you read Mein Kamf? In it he states how firmly he believed in the "true God" and in the gas chambers he threw in atheists that opposed him. In his eyes, the church's weakness was merely its peacefulness, and the only thing wrong with Christianity was that Jesus was genetically a Jew. If there are any secret atheists, It's ALL of the theists.
@dementeddc So if it is in anyway associated with the Bazi party, it's objectively bad even if it helps out people as well as a nation? Well, America has a military. So did the Nazis. Hitler wanted to be an architect so I guess we should kill all architects. Hitler was a Christian so we might as well consider most of the world's population Nazis. See how stupid your logic is? It's very stupid.
@MurderYourBoss, your retort is fundamentally flawed. While these policies may seem to benefit society, the reality is much different. That is the history of socialism. It is a philosophy intentionally designed to enslave the masses through deception. America's flirtation with socialism has created a segment of society where education levels have plummeted, economic status has dwindled, crime rates have risen, and family structures have been destroyed.
I don't care what left or right means, I just base my judgement on the results, and the results of socialism sometimes (always in my opinion) lead to fascism.
Obama has or is about to pass law that allows the government to arrest you for being possible of commiting a crime in the future, without evidence and hold you in custody....as long as required. Call it anything you want, but that sure reminds me of Adolf Hitler.
@HolliValsMusic So the system thaat the workers control the means of production and everyone owns the same property, leads to an extreme nationalist totalitarian regime, that forms an ugly union with capitalism. I'm sure that makes perfect sense in your world.
You know full well the National Socilalist party were right wingers. Its like Citizens United or Prosperity for America actually give a damn about this country and not taking the advantage of the debt and the economy to further policies that hurt the poor and the down trodden. Also the republicans were the liberals until the 1960's when they started to care about winning rather than their integrity.
@mssnrykd Well actually Teddy Roosevelt didn't Start the Bull Moose party, it was started for him, and he reluctantly ran as its representative after he left the republican party.
@slicingwater First off the wiki article says that they started it after leaving the RNC meeting. Second, regardless of who started it, are you contending that they had a different motive than the problem you implied came out in the 1960's?
Also, If, 'socialists' are left-wing, and 'nazi' comes from national socialist, how does it not follow that 'nazi' is not left-wing?
Hitler's right wing. He hated Communists and was in with Fascists such as Mussolini and Franco. He sent the Luftwaffe to bomb to bomb Spain's socialist Popular Front fighters during the Spanish Civil War. Duh.
@TheRealDinner So hating communists makes one a 'right winger'? Please, the right-left plitical terminology dates from the French revolution. You know, before Karl Marx.
Also, how do you reconcile that with his parties name being national-socialist or Nazi?
@mssnrykd One of the first things Hitler did was round up trade unionists, then ban all unions and replace them with the German Labour Front. Hitler was an admirer of Italian Fascism, and expected Franco to fight for him and Mussolini during World War 2. The Nazi Party was supported by businessmen, and I doubt a businessman would give his support to a Communist. Hitler wanted efficiency, the communists wanted equality.
@TheRealDinner Isn't 'socialism' a left-wing belief? If so, then Fascists and Nazis are both left wing. The major difference between the Fascists and the communists is nationalism.
If given a choice between supporting someone who will take away your property and someone who will simply regulate your actions, most businessmen would and did choose to back the regulator.
Also, replacing unions with a gov. controled monopoly is not a 'right' idea. Right-wingers just want to get rid of all of them.
@mssnrykd Yes but it's just a name. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea isn't democratic even though it's in the name. Fascists are right wing. That's a fact. Fascists want efficiency, Communists want equality. That means that women are allowed to work and have equal rights to men (in Nazi Germany women were encouraged to be housewives, have many children, and dress in a certain way).
You make it sound as if businessmen had no choice but they were supporting Hitler in the 1920s.
@TheRealDinner There is always a choice, some choices are just worse than others.
Names have meaning, if nothing else, they tell us what image the group adopting the image wants to present.
Your 'definition' of fascist and communist is oversimplified and childish, please fix that. Read 'liberal fascism' or something about Mussolini. Also, you make it sound as though Stalin didn't want efficiency either. Further, both had centralized economy.
@mssnrykd It's as if you're denying the existence of Right Wing extremists. It's not as if everyone on the right are angels with no extremists among them. It's the same with the left - there are moderates and extremists. We must accept that Hitler was pretty far right. If you actually look at his policies and his actions you can see that. Going on what you say we might as well brandish the GOP as a far left extremist party. National Socialism is simply a misnomer.
@TheRealDinner I'm not saying whether or not right-wing extremists exist, I'm agruing that the metaphor is of very questionable usefulness outside of its original context in the time of the french revolution. You say "We must accept that Hitler was pretty far right." I'm asking does your Right-left metaphor work with reality.
How do you get to your GOP statement?
Also, which policies? Taking away guns?
Further, Where does laissez faire fit into your definitions?
@mssnrykd Ok then, let's forget about the left-right metaphor for a second. The Nazis were "National Socialists", but the definition of the word is "the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism." If this is true why did Nazis literally fight Communists? Also, many Socialists/Communists were Jewish, like Marx, Trotsky and Rosa Luxmeburg. Let's face it, National Socialism is miles different from socialism. And I'm not seriously calling the GOP left wing extremists.
@TheRealDinner Most of your problems seem to stem from you ignoring the nationalist part. Nationalist being used to distinguish themselves from the soviet spies. (I don't know about the german ones but the U.S. had plenty, see the venona project) Also, find a definition that isn't dependent on accepting marxist theory, people were claiming to be socialists before marx.
BTW. what about mussoulini? We keep talking about Hitler but the actual "Fascists" were italian not German.
@mssnrykd Distinguish themselves from Soviet Spies? He was a nationalist, because he believed that Germany was a great nation that had been driven into the ground by Jews, Socialists, Marxists, Communists and the Treaty of Versailles. He believed that Germany should be pure, and that's why he sterilized many groups of people he considered to be sub-human. And you don't have to be Italian to be fascist, even if that's where it originated from, many Nazis believed in fascist ideology.
@TheRealDinner True you don't have to be Italian to be a fascist, but I wonder if you can name one thing you don't like about fascism without stretching to link them to the Nazis.
@mssnrykd Please, let's keep this civilized. I'm just here to give my views and present the facts. No need to get personal. All I'm trying to show is that the Nazis weren't socialists as we consider the term now. For instance, in public book burnings the books of Jack London (member of the Socialist Labor Party), Rosa Luxemburg, Engels, Einstein (Socialist and anti-Nazi) and many more. Just because the Nazi Party has socialism in the title doesn't automatically make it so. It's just a name.
@TheRealDinner What did I say that was personal? Are you refering to the comment that you removed? Also, look up socialist in a dictionary and use the definition that isn't dependent on accepting marx, by that definition the Nazis and Fascists were socialist. Yes they burned books by those they disagreed with, but so did every other totalitarian dictator. That isn't a good qualification for calling anyone a nazi or fascist since burning books predates both.
@mssnrykd " A political and economic theory of that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." You're telling me that the "means of production, distribution, and exchange" in Nazi Germany were "owned or regulated by the community as a whole."?
@TheRealDinner In the case of the Nazis, regulated not owned. This would be why they were preferable from a bussines stand point to the communists who had a nasty habit of not only siezing factories but killing the owners as well.
@waypasthadenough No they weren't socialism, they were fascist. Socialism has a common definition that people outside of Retarded Fuckland use & it doesn't fit NAZIsm, NAZIsm is a form of fascism to us here in Realityvill
@SturmUndDrang13 no again outside of retarded fuckistan socialism has an actual definition that nazism does not meet it. Only retards who don't know what nazism or socialism are claim nazism is socialism.
@SturmUndDrang13 No that would make the requirements of being the Republicsn party. Again outside of retarded fuckistan these words have actual meaning NAZIism is a type of fascism not socialism as the government doesn't own the means of production. LEARN2POLITICALSCIENCE.
@yellowkrux. Why don't you learn grammar and proper English, before teaching 'POLTICALSCIENCE'. Fascism is something totally different that nazism. You must be a real proper moron. For example, nazism is racist, fascism is not.
But I can clearly see that these nuances go beyond you and your tiny left-wing brain.
@SturmUndDrang13 You trollin'? Again LEARN2POLITICALSCIENCE. Nazism is a form of fascism, look it up. You're right fascism isn't racist neither is socialism. According to you a system that is fascist & racist is socialist & not fascist even though it fits the definition of fascism. If you are to stupid to understand that you're contradicting yourself, you qualify to run for office as a Republican. & You never \gave a metric for measuring the size of government.
@yellowkrux. "Look it up"? I have a degree in political sciences, moron. If you're too stupid to know the difference between fascism , nazism and authoritarian conservatism (Franco, Salazar, etc) you're a dumbass who should shut up about it.
@SturmUndDrang13 & I have degrees in physics, medicine, law, philosophy & your mom. Seriously I'm insulted that you would expect me to buy that shit at this point.
@SturmUndDrang13 That's right I don't have a degree in political science, but unlike you I never claimed to. Also unlike you I know what the words "fascism" "socialism" nazism" & "communism" mean. Seriously how stupid are you? Did you think I would actually believe you have a degree in political science, when you don't understand these basic terms?
I want you all to keep in mind that Molotov Mitchell is a genius,which isn't a bad thing unless he uses his genius to manipulate people who are dumber than he.Molotov fails to mention that the KKK and all those who opposed the civil rights act in 1964 all switched to the GOP. Its shameful and offensive imply that MLK supported republican ideas. MLK was a progressives. Jesus believed that the rich should pay more in taxes.
And as for the socialist line, what has Obama done that is socialist?
LiberalMediaBiasBlog 1 week ago
@LiberalMediaBiasBlog Yeah, because that is what Jesus was all about... forcing people who make more money to pay more in taxes. Its called freedom of choice, genius. Its a stupid thing to try and pin racism on either party when both are guilty. And if you can't figure out one thing that Obama has done that indicates his staunch belief in socialism, redistributionist, Keynesian economic leanings, then you are danger to society and should have yourself spade or neutered .
jdm11060 1 week ago
@jdm11060 All I did was point out few things that Mitchell left out. I never said anyone was racist, I think its insulting for him to juxtapose Progressives who were republicans when the party was progressive with right wing extremist. And as for Jesus, I believe he taught his followers to help the sick and the poor. I never brought up racism in the party but you did and then used the term "Kenynesian economic learnings" and said that i should be neutered for not realizing it. Hmm......
LiberalMediaBiasBlog 1 week ago
@jdm11060 I challenge you to name one thing socialist that Obama has done, that hadn't been proposed by a republican first. They way the right twist peoples word and actions like you did with my statement is shameful and the reason why the country is going to shit. People like this guy, Beck, and Palin are so far off in lala land that they won't compromise with anyone. They twist everything the to be seen as socialism and then they scare there followers by telling them every1 else is dishonest.
LiberalMediaBiasBlog 1 week ago
@LiberalMediaBiasBlog HA! You think I'm in the bag for the GOP? Again your incredible ignorance is on display. I detest what Republicans have become. But Democrats are the same way. Our entire system has gone socialist. If you can't see that taking sides of either Republicans or Democrats is woefully dangerous to what our founders and Constitution has originally designed, than I would like to refer you back to the end of my original reply with a greater sense of urgency.
jdm11060 6 days ago
@jdm11060 You are obviously right wing and watch Fox news way to much. The people who wrote the constitution knew that it would need to change with the times and that is why they gave us the option to change it. You obviously don't like progress and would like to bring the country back to how it was before 1860. Just b/c u hate the US it doesn't mean the US is wrong, it means u r. I don't expect you to come up with an intelligent response so don't worry, you can just keep name calling
LiberalMediaBiasBlog 6 days ago
Nazis are right wing fascists idiot.
HobbsO 2 weeks ago
@HobbsO the nazis were left wing. they were socialists. how can you class socialists as right wing?
ScottStedford14 2 weeks ago
@ScottStedford14 Explaining this to people is getting tiresome. They used the label "Socialist" in a time of national depression to get all the unions and labourers on there side. After being voted into power and fixing the economy Hitler disbanded all the unions and made any kind of club or society illegal. Finally he pretty much out right banned Marxism and blamed it on the Jew conspiracy.
HobbsO 2 weeks ago
Benito Mussolini was a socialist, but he rejected the ideology because of its internationalist bent. To fascists (including the Nazis), socialists were more loyal to the international working class than they were to their own nation - they were disloyal, in other words. Furthermore, the Nazi Party intentionally co-opted the Social Democrats' rhetoric and organizational style to create a right-wing mass political party. They called themselves socialists, but that was part of the strategy.
comfortablynumb7 2 weeks ago
FAIL EPIC HISTORY FAIL. Hitler was not a socialist; he actually thought that Marxism was part of an international Jewish conspiracy to control the world. That's why it was called the *national* socialist party - socialists view society in terms of class, whereas fascists view it in terms of nationalism. Hitler immediately threw the Social Democrats (socialists) and KPD (Communists) into concentration camps upon coming into power.
comfortablynumb7 2 weeks ago 3
Jesus right wing extremist??? pffffhahahahahhahahaha!!! poor republicans losers!
majesticguitar2 2 weeks ago
Nazi full term: National Socialist Workers Party.
CAUGHTUPALIVE1 1 month ago in playlist More videos from illuminatitv
@CAUGHTUPALIVE1 North Korea full term: Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
dave19941000 2 weeks ago
lol @ 1:22
bigun89 1 month ago
The arguments that right wing extremist started as Democrats are completely flawed. Back then, the Democratic party WAS the conservative party, and the Republicans were the liberals. The shift started with the New Deal in the 1930s. So please, we know that a Republican freed the slaves. But guess what? Lincoln would be a Democrat today.
trifonovg1 1 month ago
@trifonovg1 no
OrangeManIce 1 month ago
@trifonovg1 Actually, conservatives are liberals, those currently known as liberals are progressives or socialists or fascists, and libertarians are radical liberals. The Republican Party was part progressive, part conservative, and was literally just the "anti-slavery" party at its inception. The Democratic Party was also conservative at the time, just pro-slavery. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive Democrat and a segregationist. Racism was not tied to classical liberalism, but to the party.
nfries88 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Martin Luther King Jr. wasn't Republican.
For instance, he voted for JFK. It's no evidence but there's no evidence of the contrary either.
heathmoor 1 month ago
Comment removed
heathmoor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Where did he get that T-shirt of Obama with horns? I want another for me.
Why (unlike the presidential candidates) the best T-shirt designs never catch on?
heathmoor 1 month ago
Comment removed
heathmoor 1 month ago
>he think national socialist means the same thing as socialist
fucking moron
n0t0mega 1 month ago
@n0t0mega Are you perhaps familiar with the 25 point Nazi platform? You can classify each point as nationalist, socialist, or racist. The only way to claim that the Nazis were to the right of the spectrum would be to say either:
1. Nationalism makes them to the right therefore being on the left requires that a party is of the sort who favors globalism over national interests. Or
2. They are to the right because they are racist.
It's a lose-lose proposition. They were socialist racists.
wokeupmusician 1 month ago
@wokeupmusician
No Nazi Germany was heavily corporate, it was to corporate to be considered socialist.
You need to stop revising history, this is just as despicable as saying gay people ran the Nazi party.
n0t0mega 1 month ago
@n0t0mega I didn't say the overall state of the country. It takes time to socialize a country. I said the Nazis. Besides corporatism was an ideology of the SPD. You know the party that opposed the Nazis right up until the last free elections.
It's OK. I won't call you despicable for your ignorance. I will just assume that you are a product of your American public school education system. How else could you be deluded enough to argue with a German expat about my own history?
wokeupmusician 1 month ago
@wokeupmusician
Dude straight up fuck off, The Nazi party persecuted socialists, and communists. National socialist is not the same thing as socialist.
You're the ignorant one not me
n0t0mega 1 month ago
@n0t0mega They persecuted the Socialist Democrat Party because they opposed them. Not because they were socialist. The communist party was suppressed following the Reichstag fire. I cannot make it clear enough how foolish or indoctrinated you are.
A German citizen who had to study this for years in school has taken the time to correct your grievous error claiming something that is clear even by what you call them in English. I have never encountered this level of idiocy in my life.
wokeupmusician 1 month ago
@n0t0mega actually, you're technically right. National socialism is Fascism (thus why Hitler and Mussolini considered eachother to be "brothers"). But what is Fascism? Fascism is what happens when you take big-government social engineers and give them authoritarian control over the economy -- making "National Socialist" a fairly accurate term despite them not actually being socialist.
What is interesting to note is that before coming up with Fascism, Mussolini was a member of the Socialist Party
nfries88 1 month ago
@n0t0mega but still, they persecuted socialists and communists for political reasons (they were their biggest political opponents), not because they disagreed terribly on economic matters.
Both are ill-conceived economic totalitarians. Both wind up being horrible for the citizenry (look at the oppression of bureaucratic socialist USSR and China).
nfries88 1 month ago
@wokeupmusician
Being german does not absolve you from historical ignorance about your won country.
n0t0mega 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@n0t0mega
*your own country
n0t0mega 1 month ago
>doesn't realize republicans and democrats switched places
n0t0mega 1 month ago
@n0t0mega they really didn't. It's more like the progressivism of the right caught on in the left. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive as well as a segregationist. Martin Luther King wasn't just a Republican, he was a member of the religious far right, and he saw some degree of hope for black men in the free enterprise system; just as soon as they could be judged by the same standard as white men. The Jim Crow laws are perfect examples of un-conservative racism.
nfries88 1 month ago
Are you stupid or something? For The Record, the democrats from the past time are today's republican party. Freaking stupid.
TotallyMeAwesome223 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TotallyMeAwesome223 no, you are stupid
OrangeManIce 1 month ago
Democrats are communists. Obama is so corrupt that even not only Republicans but Democrats too have decided to investigate this administration.
Packerd01 2 months ago
Many of these facts are misrepresented or simply wrong. The origin of the Republican Christian Right started with the Southern Democrat opposition to the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960's. That was when they changed sides in the Nixon era and the GOP has been marching to their tune ever since.
The Nazis were on the far right wing because of economic policies that encouraged heavy corporatism and private ownership. The majority of the founding fathers were in fact deist or had no belief.
lamorte42 2 months ago
@lamorte42 Fascism (corporatism) is not far-right policy, it is far-left policy, reserved for those dissatisfied with free market conditions but too cowardly to attempt true socialism.
Of course, socialism is pretty abhorrent as well.
nfries88 1 month ago
@nfries88
You're a complete moron.
n0t0mega 1 month ago
@n0t0mega Historically correct, not a moron. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive Democrat, a segregationist (he thought that blacks would give whites VD), and also our first overtly corporatist president (see the Federal Reserve).
nfries88 1 month ago
On the far right is anarchism but I still like the video :)
CloverfieldMonster95 2 months ago
I loved the whole pause to apologize to home schoolers XD
but I must say, I was lucky enough to have a great US History teacher that didn't censor much of anything. He made it clear that those people were republican and that the democratic party was originally for slavery. I love your videos, they are very informative! Thank you for caring enough to post these things :)
SOAR4Jesus 2 months ago
who gives a fuck that republican was not the only people in KKK ... KKK is just bad moral
marduv 2 months ago
i usually dont like this guys videos. Because he has a strong christian agenda. But, I actually liked this one alot. Its so true. good stuff
WorldMilitia 2 months ago
a quick history lesson will show us that Nazi Germany was a big private sector and NSP was a misnomer.
kirbienstien 2 months ago 2
I think we should take that list and start checking up anyone that is not decribed by it. Of course I would say that cause every one of those items on the check list decribes me.
UtherPendragan 3 months ago
this man is a clown.
tofent2 3 months ago 2
You are funny: D
ari1234a 3 months ago
Wow way to spin the right wing agenda. Here I was basing my thoughts on right wingers on their current stances and agendas. When I should have been basing it on right wing philosophies from 100 yrs ago. Thanks for clearing that up I always knew jesus would promote no healthcare without payment. *sigh*
willweeverlearn 3 months ago
actually u should even look at whats racist....notice that white colonisation bad...and non white colonisation good? we have been so conditioned about the word racist that it immediately polorizes crackers while they are walked on in the same instance.
JASONSEPTEMBER7th84 3 months ago
This guy proves how limited his public school education really was.
edgwaterprog 4 months ago
I'm not even american, but this offends me as a human being...
OlderSnake 4 months ago
@Molotov ... maybe you should say "most of the Popes" because some were or at least supported blood thirsty behavior.
4PFrog 4 months ago
the king of england thought washington was a terrorist.
death9719 4 months ago
yes a black guy is going to be liked by hitler.
death9719 4 months ago
and did you know that Hitler had the traditional socialists in the NAZI's killed, and that the German resistance was communist. and that when Hitler said socialist he meant that the fruits of slave labor (the undesirables that didn't get gassed) should be shared with the whites. and that Marx was an abolitionist, and antiracist.
death9719 4 months ago
@death9719 Marx was also the High Priest of the Church of Satan in france...study your history.
Mark123USA 4 months ago
@Mark123USA i honestly don't care, only right wing antifreedom nutters care. we have freedom of religion for a reason. only your own worship can lead to god no religion can.
death9719 4 months ago
@death9719 you mean the left wing anti-freedom nutters, right?
Mark123USA 4 months ago
@Mark123USA no the left and the right have both yeilded up a wide range of heroes:
the left has heroes marx (idealist but he was trying to help an oppressed group), king, lincoln, bakunin, proudhon, the international brigades, the anarcho-communists of catalonia, joe hill, the miners of west virgina
it has villians stalin, lenin, mao, trotsky, the red army faction, the PIRA, the bombers of the 1900's
the right has heroes: theuro, twain, the saint Patrick's battalion.
it has bad: franoc hitler
death9719 4 months ago
mussilini, every single US politician after Lincoln, the contras, the KKK
more heroes of the right: adam smith, benjamin tucker, Emma Goldman, chomsky, and the rest
death9719 4 months ago
@death9719 i am beholden to know arbitrary line in the sand, i am beholden to my species and its freedom
death9719 4 months ago
okay, the populist party made the dems into nonracists. and the reps became racist later. and not all homeschooled people are cons, my freind is liberal and was homeschooled. also i am an anarchist, and i go to a democratic school.
death9719 4 months ago
Well tell that to Norway.
slicingwater 4 months ago
Haha And Hitler Was A Rightwing Bonehead That Shot Himself Because We Wooped His Ass And I Think Its Time You Should Do The Same For Our Country!!
IRatherBeDeadThanRed 4 months ago
All those racist democrats fled to the republican party after LBJ signed civil rights legislation.
bradjbourgeois73 5 months ago
@FREEAMERICANOW69 Did you not know the NIV is also published by the same company to publishes the satanic bible? You should do your research before quoting that filth. Don't let yourself be deceived so easily.
bane5150 5 months ago
@bane5150
hey retard, do you know that publishers are in a business to make money and they have the right to publish anything that's legal, and that judeo-christian god is myth and historical evidence proves it?
watch :3.3.3 Atheism: A History of God (Part 1)
Evid3nc3
so since i got history on my side, it's you who are being deceived.
think for yourself, for once.
FREEAMERICANOW69 4 months ago
"Nazi is an abbreviated word for 'National Socialist'"
True enough, but socialism doesn't just come bundled together with socialism. Nationalism is nearly synonymous with right-wing politics, emphasizing the feverish disdain of foreign influences, non-native cultural practices, the deification of the military, and the distillation of ethnic, gender, sexual, and religious persuasions into the credentials for hierarchy.
Nationalism has NOTHING inherently to do with socialism.
bigollameo 5 months ago
it's clear that he doesn't know what the word, extremist is or that they, right-wing extremists are willing to kill for their beliefs, even though they won't test their beliefs to make sure they're right and doesn't care that other people doesn't care in their beliefs at all.
just like people who killed abortionists because they claimed that their bible, gives them the right to do it...but the bible supports abortion, genocide, infanticide, murder and slavery.
these people are stupid.
FREEAMERICANOW69 5 months ago 2
@FREEAMERICANOW69 while the abortionist were killing miilions....and I think you we reading..really don't know but it wasn't the BIBLE
FAIL !
adoptedoneathotmail 5 months ago
@a
and how many millions did christians kill and are killing now?
the human parasitic fetus has no right to life and a woman shouldn't be forced into keeping an unwanted pregnancy and have her body, life and future ruined because ppl like u hate abortion.
the bible supported abortion. the footnote from NIV 1984 footnote from numbers 5:11-31 said:
"Numbers 5:21 Or causes you to have a miscarrying womb and barrenness"
to CAUSE a miscarrying womb is an abortion.
now fuck off.
FREEAMERICANOW69 5 months ago
@FREEAMERICANOW69 Hey moron, that verse is a punishment for accidentally causing a miscarriage. What do you think God's thought's are on deliberate abortion? Since when is a baby a parasite? I suppose you think the same of unborn eagles right? You are just too stupid. Really.
1980PintoMan 5 months ago
@1
hey retard, that verse is a ruse for an abortion and the 1984 NIV footnote proves it.
"Numbers 5:21 Or causes you to have a miscarrying womb and barrenness"
to CAUSE a miscarrying womb IS an abortion.
prove that your god is real, even though historical evidence proves he's not...so the writers of your myth had no problem with abortion, since they supported infanticide.
when did i say a baby was a parasite? never...i said a fetus is parasite and symbiosis proves it.
think, next time.
FREEAMERICANOW69 4 months ago
The Bushes were statists too.
TheLoyalOfficer 5 months ago
oh ho ho. What do you say now after Oslo
classicgamerguy112 6 months ago
@classicgamerguy112 What do you say after the Russian revolution, the French Revolution, the Holocaust, Mao, etc.?
mssnrykd 6 months ago
I wonder if he knows who Ron Paul is
jbenjamin06 6 months ago
you realize Abraham Lincoln was one of the worst presidents in American history right ?
jsbobo36 6 months ago
If you sit home waiting your turn you deserve to have your gun taken from your cold dead hands.
The Founders didn’t wait for the Brits to knock down their doors. They gathered at the green and stood up like men and they killed government employees all the way back to Boston.
What will you do when it’s time to hunt NWO hacks, republicrats and commies(“Liberals” and ‘progressives’)?
Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first.
waypasthadenough 6 months ago
looks like another Cockfail. haha
TMBrd89 6 months ago
Im not a right or left.... Im right in the middle where I belong. Independent!
memback01 6 months ago
Dumbass who likes to make fancy videos.
ianhowe007 6 months ago
i love when they say "drrr Hitler was a leftist because Nazi means "National Socialist." Hm, well I guess North Korea is a thriving constitutional republic, a democracy, because North Korea is called "the Democratic Republic of North Korea." Socialism was all the rage when the Nazis came on the scene, they used the term, but were: Nationalists, socialists are Internationalists. They BANNED socialist/communist literature, etc. etc. etc.
BillKiernan 7 months ago
After the Civil Rights Movement, the "racist inbred Democrats" switched to the GOP. And National Socialism was a form of fascism, an extreme right wing position. Just saying these things for the record, 'cause the illuminative record is very, very wrong.
onlylettersand0to9 7 months ago
Just because you're a member of the Democratic Party doesn't make you a person from the left. Those old school southern Democrats wouldn't agree with almost all of what the Democratic Party stands for today. On the other side Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican, but he has been noted to of said things in support of Democratic Socialism. Furthermore, the ideology of the Nazi Party was facsism; fascism is very complicated because it is composed of anti-capitalist and anti-marxist views. Learn
CreekSalt 7 months ago
@CreekSalt Exacttly, This guy is making it seem like Hitler was a socialist when he actually killed communists. Nazis hated communism and liked fascism. But If Molotov actually read about what kind of government the nazi's were trying to propose was not socialism. The nazis hid behind the nam,e because no one wants to join a fascism party.
FTJproductions 7 months ago
Republicans today are not republicans. They haven't been for at least 30 years. They used to be conservatives, now they're just neo-conservatives. It used to be about the economy, now it's a crowd of petty little bastards who waste the spotlight fighting over abortion, religion, marriage and gun rights.
samisyosam 7 months ago
As far as my views, I am a Libertarian. Libertarinism = True Conservatism. Read the following if you really want to know: conservativeforchange (dot) com / 2009 / 05 / what-true-conservatism-really-is (dot) html
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc
Hey, what a twist! I'm a Libertarian too, and I don't just believe the bullshit that people who lie and lable themselves with that lable spew out; not because they have a pretty website, and not because they claim purity.
a true libertarian stands for the most rights possible, meaning the complete left-most political view point possible where eveyone is in charge of government and the betterment of our country. I'm afraid we ARE our brother's keeper.
LuminousTruth 7 months ago
@LuminousTruth, I agree Libertarians do believe people should be in complete control of our government, as well as our lives, but that's not the case is it? You are right we share some views with Liberals, but we also share some with Conservatives. Liberals hold the belief that only government can guarantee social justice, and seek an increase in government, taxes, and regulation. That's socialism, and I know of no Libertarians who call themselves left-wing. We're somewhere in the middle.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc
o.k. lets go by the current trends:
Liberals belief that government (since we elect it and it is supposed to be responsible to us) is the best safest but not the only entity that can guarantee social justice.
Conservatives also believe this, hence no privatization of the Judicial branch.
Liberals seek to strenghen our government/country by increasing in capabilities, it's income, and it's regulation. that's not socialism. Conservatives do this also. I'm progresive libertarian
LuminousTruth 7 months ago
@LuminousTruth, and therein lies the rub. Progressive I am not. That ideology is naive because it completely ignores the nature of mankind. Mankind will never "progress" beyond it's nature - there will always be those who are born to do evil in the world. There is no way around that (that's biology), so it's fallacy to ever seek absolute control. Absolute control corrupts absolutely. By the way, government control is socialism. Do look that up. Libertarianism is individual liberty.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc Libertarians also wants to get rid of the minimum wage. As if getting by on $7.50 an hour was bad enough. They argue that by doing this it helps the economy and lowers unemployment. Sure more people will be employed, but for steadily decreasing wages. America will turn into a sweatshop economy.
Libertarians don't care about the common good. Liberty is more important than the community. Why should a libertarian with a nice job care that everyone else works for a dollar a day?
samisyosam 7 months ago
@samisyosam, left unchecked you may be right but no one is proposing totally eliminating common sense, only that government shouldn't be the one deciding that issue. 1st off, wages should be left to the people, their employers, and the state in which they live in (if not their local communities). Why? Because conditions vary across the country. A one-sized fits all approach doesn't work.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@samisyosam, 2nd this country needs to reform society and business. Many people have lost all sense of integrity and personal responsibility. If we don't want religion taught in schools, we should come up with an alternative to teach values of right and wrong to our children. Also, it's possible to build employee representation into the business structure, without paying dues to a faceless union with it's own agenda. Many modern businesses do that.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@samisyosam, Libertarians most certainly do care about others, only it's up to US to make society better, not the government. Government ruins everything it touches. If you honestly care about workers, health care, or anything else then do something about it in your local community. The only thing you're doing by placing that in the hands of DC is making the politicians rich and giving them power, while they laugh at your suffering. Do wake up.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc Right. Eeeverything it has ever touched has been ruined. Like those roads you walk on, the commodities like gas, food and paint without heavy metals in them (damn those bastards! lead was cheaper to use!), the national forests that aren't clear-cut wastes, damn regulations!
Our country is falling into disrepair because it's been mis-managed. Don't blame the government model just because some idiots are behind the wheel. Call them out on it, show the people. Make integrity a habit.
samisyosam 7 months ago
@LuminousTruth, you're also wrong about Libertarianism being leftmost on the political scale. Again, that dichotomy is misunderstood. Left-wing means complete government control, right-wing means no government control. Why do you think Ron Paul and Gary Johnson are running as Republicans? Because the one thing we have in common with them is the sense of small government, nothing more. Liberals haven't believed in that concept since JFK, otherwise I would be supporting them.
dementeddc 7 months ago
Wow you are a true moron, I knew all those things and they are all half-truths when we jump to your "no right-wing extremists" hypothesis,
1. Did you know, there were Conservative Democrats :O,
2. did you know, "right-wing" actually means Conservative?
3. did you know, Conservative can mean a lot of different things at differnt times?
4. Did you know, the ending of slavery is by definition a liberal stance?
5. Did you know, those people were Republican because that wasn't 2011?
LuminousTruth 7 months ago
The dichotomy of left vs. right is completely false as most of you seem to understand it. Left wing would be complete government control, whereas right wing would be complete anarchy and no government. This is the true scale to judge ideology. Fascism in all forms is left wing. Evangelicals were Democrats until the election of Ronald Reagan, but after the election of Clinton returned to the left. Take Westboro Baptist or Terry Jones for example - both are registered Democrat supporters.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc
Complete Government control is the sense of a true democracy, where EVERYONE is involved in all of government in a perfect way, with the most rights possible, meaning all rights which don't affect other's rights. Fascism is an Authoritarian stance, and has more to do with conservatism than with "government control of everything". conservatism in NOT anarchism. your over simplifications show that your mind is overly simple. which makes you a conservative republican.
LuminousTruth 7 months ago
@LuminousTruth, the following is a direct quote from Hitler's Secret Conversations (1953): National Socialism and religion cannot exist together. The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity...
dementeddc 7 months ago
(quote continued) Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things. (p 6 & 7) . Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure. (p 43) The reason why the ancient world was so pure, light and serene was that it knew nothing of the two great scourges: the pox and Christianity.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc
O.k. and The Bible says that the writer of a particular verse says that Jesus said that he came to bring fire to our world and to divide people amongst eachother and against peace. not a very noble or good thing if you ask me. What's your point in quoting Hitler's book? that he believed in evolution and stopped being Catholic and didn't want to become Lutheran/protestant? That really just shows a failure on the part of Catholics and protestants. are you saying Hitler was a muslim?
LuminousTruth 7 months ago
@LuminousTruth, no, as I pointed out Hitler was an atheist who used religion to achieve his goals. His obsession with the occult is well documented - he searched the world for artifacts contained in myths because he sought their power. Strange, but true. Luckily they were just stories. It's funny you mention muslims, though. Hitler met with the muslim brotherhood in the 1930's. In fact, he made them part of the SS in the middle east because of their shared hatred of jews.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc
no clearly he was a secret muslim. did he ever say "Islam is the most vile religion, used by Jews to enslave us"? no. and so it's save to jump to the conclusion that he was a secret muslim. Did hitler kill atheists in the gas chambers? hell no, never! at least I never heard he did (he did). atheists aren't obsessed with the occult, in fact, most atheists are naturalists who don't believe in magic. If Hitler was an atheist he was definately NOT a "militant/fundamentalist" atheist..
LuminousTruth 7 months ago
@LuminousTruth, now you're making no sense. Hitler did not believe in occult lore, simply the idea that these myths may have been based on some truth that was misinterpreted by savages (again, his own words). He did not subscribe to any established religious view outside of his childhood. He was a evil, insane bastard concerned only with his own ego and greatness. What exactly are you trying to imply?
dementeddc 7 months ago
These videos are not informing anyone of anything useful. Good job.
srbeiler 7 months ago
Such brutal dishonesty... talking about what Democrats were like 100 years ago.
Times have changed, mate. I can show you 1000 KKK members who vote Republican for every 1 you can show voting Democrat. (If you could actually find one, that is...)
fearguis 7 months ago
@fearguis, you offer nothing but baseless claims. I, on the other hand, offer ongoing policies by the Progressive left intended to harm my people and wipe us from the face of this country. The myth that the left abandoned these policies after Civil rights is only accepted by those reared on revisionist history. I dare you to watch some of the clips on my channel if you're so secure in your worldview.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc Baseless claims? I said that the majority of KKK members vote Republican. That is hardly baseless. :) Perhaps you meant to respond to someone else?
fearguis 7 months ago
@fearguis, throwing out that claim is baseless. Where is your proof? Thomas Robb, director of The Knights Party (the modern klan), endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2008. To be fair, they did say they would consider voting for McCain if Obama won the nomination. A 2009 legal case (State of Nebraska vs. Robert Henderson), confirmed the Knights Party is essentially the same organization as the KKK, retaining the same framework and political ties originally established by the Democrat Party.
dementeddc 7 months ago
In 1992, the KKK in Arkansas endorsed William J. Clinton, but withdrew that endorsement when the media starting touting Clinton as the 1st "black" president. Similiar "white pride" groups in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Texas, Alabama, Texas, and Mississippi have endorsed Democrat candidates as well up until the election of Obama. Since then, these groups have been seeking to create an alternative party representing their values (platforms can be found on their sites).
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc If any of that were true, you might have a point. Dude, don't even attempt to convince anyone that white supremacists are not overwhelmingly Republican. You know they are as well I do. You can support the Republicans if you want, they represent plenty of different things, and they are not all white supremacists. But saying that white supremacists vote Democrat would only be fitting as a headline on The Onion.
fearguis 7 months ago
@fearguis, it is true and they do, however understand they have their own agenda. I am not saying that I support Republicans. See the post I just put. There are racists on both sides of the aisle, and I see that as more of a generational issue than an ideological one. However, the racists that have infiltrated the left have intentionally used government policy to harm us minorities. That is fact. One could argue that the GOP has done the same, but it's not as obvious.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@fearguis, personally I hate both parties, and would welcome a system where we have neither. The biggest point I have been trying to make is that rich elites control BOTH parties, and are responsible for most of the ills we have faced and will face. That's not to say there aren't "normal" people who run for office, but take a look at who usually wins. It's the same suspects. Traditionally, people out these kind of politicians by labelling them as "progressives" (on both sides of the aisle).
dementeddc 7 months ago
But... but "Nazi" mean NATIONAL socialist. By your warped logic, that means American patriots are Nazis too. That means the founding fathers you love to worship have more in common with Hitler than anything and if you love America and take pride in your nation, you're a nazi. By your definiton, Molotov.
MurderYourBoss 7 months ago
Not mention Hitler was a rabid homophobe, and advocated killing them too... Kind of sounds like the "Kill the Gays" bill you supported in Uganda, Molotov. If anything, you have more in common with Hitler than anyone else. Please... you say Obama has more in common with Hitler than Reagan or Bush? He wouldn't even be alive for long in that regime, as Hitler hated black people. Hitler invaded small countries to satisfy the arms-titans in Germany, which sounds very similar to...
TheRedstar1979 7 months ago
Yeah, talk about only putting in facts that support your twisted world-view in this video, or changing them so they do. I can't stand 95% percent of conservative bullshit like this. If you don't like the facts, change them. Hitler advocated the destruction of trade unions and was vehemently anticommunist. He sent communists to concentration camps even before the Jews. He was as right-wing as right-wing gets, which is why we should be careful.
TheRedstar1979 7 months ago
what a load of bullshit.
ChasingDemons23 7 months ago
The National Socialists German Workers' Party (Nazi's) advocated the welfare state, worker's rights, railed against capitalism (the Weimar Republic was a Captialist Democracy), and forwarded the notion that government is better suited to running people's lives than they are. Sound familiar? By the way, Hitler was also an atheist (filled German churches with SS, not pastors), and persecuted Jews because he hated religion (read his own words). If you support these things, you're the fascist.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc
Hitler wasn't an Atheist.
valkhorn 7 months ago
@valkhorn, yes he was. Hitler was raised christian, but was atheist when he took control of the Nazi party. In Mein Kamf he states how much he hated religion and the church and wanted to see it erased from the world, yet he recognized the church could convince the populace to commit deeds they would normally be against. He got this idea from America, where churches were used to justify the enslavement of blacks and eastern europeans and the eradication of native Americans.
dementeddc 7 months ago
@dementeddc
Have you read Mein Kamf? In it he states how firmly he believed in the "true God" and in the gas chambers he threw in atheists that opposed him. In his eyes, the church's weakness was merely its peacefulness, and the only thing wrong with Christianity was that Jesus was genetically a Jew. If there are any secret atheists, It's ALL of the theists.
LuminousTruth 7 months ago
@dementeddc So if it is in anyway associated with the Bazi party, it's objectively bad even if it helps out people as well as a nation? Well, America has a military. So did the Nazis. Hitler wanted to be an architect so I guess we should kill all architects. Hitler was a Christian so we might as well consider most of the world's population Nazis. See how stupid your logic is? It's very stupid.
MurderYourBoss 7 months ago
@MurderYourBoss, your retort is fundamentally flawed. While these policies may seem to benefit society, the reality is much different. That is the history of socialism. It is a philosophy intentionally designed to enslave the masses through deception. America's flirtation with socialism has created a segment of society where education levels have plummeted, economic status has dwindled, crime rates have risen, and family structures have been destroyed.
dementeddc 7 months ago
Comment removed
dementeddc 7 months ago
Comment removed
dementeddc 7 months ago
I don't care what left or right means, I just base my judgement on the results, and the results of socialism sometimes (always in my opinion) lead to fascism.
Obama has or is about to pass law that allows the government to arrest you for being possible of commiting a crime in the future, without evidence and hold you in custody....as long as required. Call it anything you want, but that sure reminds me of Adolf Hitler.
HolliValsMusic 7 months ago
@HolliValsMusic So the system thaat the workers control the means of production and everyone owns the same property, leads to an extreme nationalist totalitarian regime, that forms an ugly union with capitalism. I'm sure that makes perfect sense in your world.
slicingwater 7 months ago
@slicingwater The problem with all these system is that they require people to be in charge of other people.
HolliValsMusic 7 months ago
You know full well the National Socilalist party were right wingers. Its like Citizens United or Prosperity for America actually give a damn about this country and not taking the advantage of the debt and the economy to further policies that hurt the poor and the down trodden. Also the republicans were the liberals until the 1960's when they started to care about winning rather than their integrity.
slicingwater 7 months ago
@slicingwater I'm pretty sure Teddy Roosevelt would have something to say about that, what with his starting the bul moose party and all.
Also, you might consider how many of those policies actually help the people they are supposed to.
mssnrykd 7 months ago
@mssnrykd Well actually Teddy Roosevelt didn't Start the Bull Moose party, it was started for him, and he reluctantly ran as its representative after he left the republican party.
slicingwater 7 months ago
@slicingwater First off the wiki article says that they started it after leaving the RNC meeting. Second, regardless of who started it, are you contending that they had a different motive than the problem you implied came out in the 1960's?
Also, If, 'socialists' are left-wing, and 'nazi' comes from national socialist, how does it not follow that 'nazi' is not left-wing?
mssnrykd 7 months ago
Hitler's right wing. He hated Communists and was in with Fascists such as Mussolini and Franco. He sent the Luftwaffe to bomb to bomb Spain's socialist Popular Front fighters during the Spanish Civil War. Duh.
TheRealDinner 8 months ago
@TheRealDinner So hating communists makes one a 'right winger'? Please, the right-left plitical terminology dates from the French revolution. You know, before Karl Marx.
Also, how do you reconcile that with his parties name being national-socialist or Nazi?
mssnrykd 7 months ago
@mssnrykd One of the first things Hitler did was round up trade unionists, then ban all unions and replace them with the German Labour Front. Hitler was an admirer of Italian Fascism, and expected Franco to fight for him and Mussolini during World War 2. The Nazi Party was supported by businessmen, and I doubt a businessman would give his support to a Communist. Hitler wanted efficiency, the communists wanted equality.
TheRealDinner 7 months ago
@TheRealDinner Isn't 'socialism' a left-wing belief? If so, then Fascists and Nazis are both left wing. The major difference between the Fascists and the communists is nationalism.
If given a choice between supporting someone who will take away your property and someone who will simply regulate your actions, most businessmen would and did choose to back the regulator.
Also, replacing unions with a gov. controled monopoly is not a 'right' idea. Right-wingers just want to get rid of all of them.
mssnrykd 7 months ago
@mssnrykd Yes but it's just a name. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea isn't democratic even though it's in the name. Fascists are right wing. That's a fact. Fascists want efficiency, Communists want equality. That means that women are allowed to work and have equal rights to men (in Nazi Germany women were encouraged to be housewives, have many children, and dress in a certain way).
You make it sound as if businessmen had no choice but they were supporting Hitler in the 1920s.
TheRealDinner 7 months ago
@TheRealDinner There is always a choice, some choices are just worse than others.
Names have meaning, if nothing else, they tell us what image the group adopting the image wants to present.
Your 'definition' of fascist and communist is oversimplified and childish, please fix that. Read 'liberal fascism' or something about Mussolini. Also, you make it sound as though Stalin didn't want efficiency either. Further, both had centralized economy.
mssnrykd 7 months ago
@mssnrykd It's as if you're denying the existence of Right Wing extremists. It's not as if everyone on the right are angels with no extremists among them. It's the same with the left - there are moderates and extremists. We must accept that Hitler was pretty far right. If you actually look at his policies and his actions you can see that. Going on what you say we might as well brandish the GOP as a far left extremist party. National Socialism is simply a misnomer.
TheRealDinner 7 months ago
@TheRealDinner I'm not saying whether or not right-wing extremists exist, I'm agruing that the metaphor is of very questionable usefulness outside of its original context in the time of the french revolution. You say "We must accept that Hitler was pretty far right." I'm asking does your Right-left metaphor work with reality.
How do you get to your GOP statement?
Also, which policies? Taking away guns?
Further, Where does laissez faire fit into your definitions?
mssnrykd 7 months ago
@mssnrykd Ok then, let's forget about the left-right metaphor for a second. The Nazis were "National Socialists", but the definition of the word is "the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism." If this is true why did Nazis literally fight Communists? Also, many Socialists/Communists were Jewish, like Marx, Trotsky and Rosa Luxmeburg. Let's face it, National Socialism is miles different from socialism. And I'm not seriously calling the GOP left wing extremists.
TheRealDinner 7 months ago
@TheRealDinner Most of your problems seem to stem from you ignoring the nationalist part. Nationalist being used to distinguish themselves from the soviet spies. (I don't know about the german ones but the U.S. had plenty, see the venona project) Also, find a definition that isn't dependent on accepting marxist theory, people were claiming to be socialists before marx.
BTW. what about mussoulini? We keep talking about Hitler but the actual "Fascists" were italian not German.
mssnrykd 7 months ago
@mssnrykd Distinguish themselves from Soviet Spies? He was a nationalist, because he believed that Germany was a great nation that had been driven into the ground by Jews, Socialists, Marxists, Communists and the Treaty of Versailles. He believed that Germany should be pure, and that's why he sterilized many groups of people he considered to be sub-human. And you don't have to be Italian to be fascist, even if that's where it originated from, many Nazis believed in fascist ideology.
TheRealDinner 7 months ago
@TheRealDinner True you don't have to be Italian to be a fascist, but I wonder if you can name one thing you don't like about fascism without stretching to link them to the Nazis.
mssnrykd 7 months ago
Comment removed
TheRealDinner 7 months ago
@mssnrykd Please, let's keep this civilized. I'm just here to give my views and present the facts. No need to get personal. All I'm trying to show is that the Nazis weren't socialists as we consider the term now. For instance, in public book burnings the books of Jack London (member of the Socialist Labor Party), Rosa Luxemburg, Engels, Einstein (Socialist and anti-Nazi) and many more. Just because the Nazi Party has socialism in the title doesn't automatically make it so. It's just a name.
TheRealDinner 7 months ago
@TheRealDinner What did I say that was personal? Are you refering to the comment that you removed? Also, look up socialist in a dictionary and use the definition that isn't dependent on accepting marx, by that definition the Nazis and Fascists were socialist. Yes they burned books by those they disagreed with, but so did every other totalitarian dictator. That isn't a good qualification for calling anyone a nazi or fascist since burning books predates both.
mssnrykd 7 months ago
@mssnrykd " A political and economic theory of that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." You're telling me that the "means of production, distribution, and exchange" in Nazi Germany were "owned or regulated by the community as a whole."?
TheRealDinner 7 months ago
@TheRealDinner In the case of the Nazis, regulated not owned. This would be why they were preferable from a bussines stand point to the communists who had a nasty habit of not only siezing factories but killing the owners as well.
mssnrykd 6 months ago
@TheRealDinner
They just weren't your brand of socialists. It's all rooted in the same authoritarian evil.
Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first.
waypasthadenough 6 months ago
@waypasthadenough No they weren't socialism, they were fascist. Socialism has a common definition that people outside of Retarded Fuckland use & it doesn't fit NAZIsm, NAZIsm is a form of fascism to us here in Realityvill
yellowkrux 6 months ago
@yellowkrux. National SOCIALISM or nazism is socialism, smartass.
SturmUndDrang13 6 months ago
@SturmUndDrang13 no again outside of retarded fuckistan socialism has an actual definition that nazism does not meet it. Only retards who don't know what nazism or socialism are claim nazism is socialism.
yellowkrux 6 months ago
@yellowkrux. Nationalization, collectivization and authoritarianism meets the requirement of being socialism, red wuss.
SturmUndDrang13 6 months ago
@SturmUndDrang13 No that would make the requirements of being the Republicsn party. Again outside of retarded fuckistan these words have actual meaning NAZIism is a type of fascism not socialism as the government doesn't own the means of production. LEARN2POLITICALSCIENCE.
yellowkrux 6 months ago
@yellowkrux. Why don't you learn grammar and proper English, before teaching 'POLTICALSCIENCE'. Fascism is something totally different that nazism. You must be a real proper moron. For example, nazism is racist, fascism is not.
But I can clearly see that these nuances go beyond you and your tiny left-wing brain.
SturmUndDrang13 6 months ago
Comment removed
yellowkrux 6 months ago
@SturmUndDrang13 You trollin'? Again LEARN2POLITICALSCIENCE. Nazism is a form of fascism, look it up. You're right fascism isn't racist neither is socialism. According to you a system that is fascist & racist is socialist & not fascist even though it fits the definition of fascism. If you are to stupid to understand that you're contradicting yourself, you qualify to run for office as a Republican. & You never \gave a metric for measuring the size of government.
yellowkrux 6 months ago
@yellowkrux. "Look it up"? I have a degree in political sciences, moron. If you're too stupid to know the difference between fascism , nazism and authoritarian conservatism (Franco, Salazar, etc) you're a dumbass who should shut up about it.
SturmUndDrang13 6 months ago
@SturmUndDrang13 & I have degrees in physics, medicine, law, philosophy & your mom. Seriously I'm insulted that you would expect me to buy that shit at this point.
yellowkrux 6 months ago
@yellowkrux. Obviously you don't have a degree in political sciences. Stick to your medicine, commie fuck.
SturmUndDrang13 6 months ago
Comment removed
yellowkrux 6 months ago
@SturmUndDrang13 That's right I don't have a degree in political science, but unlike you I never claimed to. Also unlike you I know what the words "fascism" "socialism" nazism" & "communism" mean. Seriously how stupid are you? Did you think I would actually believe you have a degree in political science, when you don't understand these basic terms?
yellowkrux 6 months ago
@yellowkrux. You're not a commie but I must be a nazi? Whatever, douche.
SturmUndDrang13 5 months ago