MISTER MORRISON

[Macajah]

d. I mean I did actually eidt in explainations in scroll. For the stuff that is not explained. What am I talking about?

[philmfan]

Glad to see some Balloonman material here. This is a great clip. Seems familiar but then again not. Love the way it sort of just jumps in on the middle and fades out mid-sentence. And that limp balloon dangling there, uninflated, there's some possibilities there in that, somewhere. And titles! Now it's clear that the clips we already posted should have had titles! Think of the possibilities, using text over clips after the fact...

[Macajah]

I fooled with this. With dialogue boxes. With explainations as scrolli g script. I fiddled with it for awhile, off an on, maybe a week or more before I decided it was best unexplaine

[Macajah]

But you know Pil. in the e d I decided it makes no difference that I could make it better, rather make it CLEAR. There are 3 or 4 choice spots that would have cleared it up fine. Example. Tim conway Show,, that reference to the LEECHMANTim Conway.

[Macajah]

That was Craig Nelson and I didn't mention him, his name. That would have gie diesion, currency so to speak to it. Would or didn't take many 'titles' . Scrolls would be, were, when i did them, brief. Sweet. Bt as I say, eith the 'advantages' and the rtools to do it, better leave MM, I think, at lesst in this instance, probalble most, as they are. There are what they are.

[Macajah]

You get what it is. Sure, it would be legit and effective too to do stuff. But I cam conviced, at tis point, convinced this piece is best left alone, exce;pt for the lead in MM and the out MM.