it depends on the circumstances under which you have to do a forced landing and the fields quality. in some cases it is impossible to land your aircraft for example when you've lost control because a rudder is blocked. in this case the parachute would safe your life. a forced landing on a normal field is a high risk which could cause high damages not only to the airplane but also to its crew. if you try to land on a wet field you could easily rip off the landing gear or roll ove
Is a parachute that much safer than a forced landing in a field? I ask because I'm learning how to do PFLs at the moment for my private license, but I'm learning to do them in a 1970's C-152!
The only thing that worries me is that with this installed, the emphisis of keeping failures from happening to begin with may become lax. "Well, we don't need to improve that, if it fails, there's a parachute to save the day" mentallity may start to take hold. It's a nice feature, but eliminating engine failures and pilot error should be the number one priority.
@sixstringfretter i completely agree with you people will give a bit of slack because of the chute during preflights and people will miss stuff you would ordinaroly find like a loose screw.
Yep. According to these guys, they claim that they have save over a hundred planes with close to 300 people. I wish I could see what the reasons for all those failures were. Bet you alot of it is stupid shit that the owners just screwed up.
I think it should be mandatory on all planes! Hurry and perfect the technology so the large commercial planes can have these as well! It would give me a great deal of peace of mind when flying! I'd rather hear about this happening instead of having more peanuts offered on my flights!
@minored360 they have been selling them for hang gliders, ultralights, homebuilts for a years. Cirrus is the first certified aircraft to install them in their planes to compensate for the unrecoverable spin problem.
Would be pretty cool if Diamond Aircraft implements these too! I would probably get a Cirrus over a Diamond Star right now but only because of the chute!! I also saw that the Terrafugia will have parachutes too, I wonder if they will be using Boris Popov's chutes too!?
Excellent technology. I was actually involved in a forced landing/crash caused by an engine failure about a year ago, fortunately, my friend and I both walked away from it with only minor injuries. Often a safe landing can be made in the event of an engine failure, but there are situations where that is not the case. At those times having BRS as an option could be the difference between life and death.
First really? every UL in europe is forced to have a parachute for the whole plane. years befor this brave american invited this "first". be ashamed m*therf*cker!
First really? every UL in europe is forced to have a parachute for the whole plane. years befor this brave american invited this "first". be ashamed motherfucker!
The Cirrus has them installed on all of their aircraft because they are prone to unrecoverable spins! The Challenger II I fly has one installed and I am Grateful its there.
I can't believe the fallacies in this video. It is wrong that the parachute saves the plane. It's goal is to save the pilot, the plane usually gets damaged on impact. The reason is that it is much safer to lower the plane on a chute then have the pilot bail out - they can get injured or killed, or may not be able to bail out at all because of the G-forces. The exception is when the plane is on fire - in this case personal chutes are better.
@rolfen Yes, they do use the term "save the airplane" however, it is clear the meaning is that they are saving the airplane in order to save the passengers.
In a light aircraft there is hardly room for individual 'chutes for each passenger. And getting out of airplanes not designed to get out of mid-air, especially at the low altitudes light planes generally fly at, is hardly a good idea.
It is not a fallacy, it's just not the most accurate or clear wording.
as a search and rescuer it makes my job easier to see a plane from the air for our air crews because of the white and red of the parachute i aplaude what you are doing at BRS
What if the part containing the parachute is ripped off if the plane is somehow severed in a mid-air jackknife? I personally think this is a brilliant invention but everyone flying should have their own personal parachutes as a backup - if I'm correct this is law in Germany.
I`am looking at learning to fly. I`am not fond of hights to say the least but its something I always wanted to do. I think the parachute idea is great but after checking out all the deployments online, most people still suffer serious injury or die after deploying it. Better than nothing though I suppose.
@Apollo580 If you check out the whole thing, there is a page on the net that tells you every time it has been deployed and what the outcome was etc. Read that, then comment back. Not always the parachute`s fault though, must admit.
@gigantojim if it is placed to far away from the CG then it can cause a nose down position or a tail down position, no one has had fatal problems but their can be mild back injury which would result in a bruise
@gustavo87467357 hell yea u can, if u lose ur engine, pilots need to stop acting like this is their only option. Ever heard of a deadstick landing jezus christ.
go fuck yourself. what if the situation is unrecoverable. turning stall departing pattern from a soft field (still gaining airspeed) and your engine quits. hmmmmmm..... where the fuck am i gonna go. spin stall trying to get back to the runway, or right into the pine tees at the forward threshold of the departed runway.......hmmmmmm CAPS comes in handy
@beechcraft12 First of all lemme ask you this, have you flown a cirrus? If your turning departing a pattern you have to try to stall this thing, and if you stall from turning because the pilot is a dumbass like you and didnt read the stall speeds at angles of bank, i can see why you might need this parachute. Btw if your engine quit and your way above the runway, have you thought of mayb pitching the nose down and finding a suitable landing spot, btw the caps has only been tested at 900ft agl
@beechcraft12 People like you should be banned from flying with the type of aeronautical knowledge you have. Do the world a favor and stay out of a plane dumbshit
@XxMartialArtistxX fuck off, you piece of shit troll. btw, i earned my wings with the same knowledge as everyone else that is licensed to fly. its not just given to random people, dumbshit. i encourage you to go try it, its a fun hobby/job etc. :)
@beechcraft12 i know its not given to random people, i know theres alot more training involved, and i know its a good hobby/job. Idk if u can look up other pilots numbers, but if u dont beleive me ill be more than happy to prove to you i have my license as well ;)
@XxMartialArtistxX You are probably the most ignorant person I've seen. There was an instance where an aircraft was cutoff by another towing a glider - the wire clipped the wing clean off- CAPS is what kept the guy alive. Go ahead and try and deadstick a one winged aircraft not capable of 300+ kts... Idiot.
The pilot manual for Cirrus SR22 states that deployment may cause serious injury or death! Emergency section, 3-20 I think. Oh great... and that the impact is the same as dropping the aircraft 13 feet high from the ground! Not a fan, not just because of those reasons, but the stick is awful, the throttle is a power lever... not interested.
Does anyone know if a similar system is in development for commercial airliners? I mean i would literally pay hundreds more knowing that there is at least some hope of survival in the remote case something aweful happens.
For anyone that is interested, google Cirrus Aircraft parachute deployments, there is a complete list of the usages of this system and each pilot and the people aboard the aircraft, location and parameters of the reason for deployment. Excellent work BRS and Cirrus A/C!! Awesome idea.
@BuzzDyou Awesome indeed. Reading some of the deployment incidents though I can't help but think the next revisions of Cirrus aircraft should employ black boxes to record what caused the plane to lose control and whether the parachute was fired by choice or whether it shot out for no reason!
The Cirrus is the first plane I have owned that my wife will let me take BOTH kids at once... because of the Chute! Proud owner of C-GOPX, 2002 Sr-20.
this is the way forward, I hate it when people give up before trying, many said this sort of thing couldn't be done, this dude had to go through an incident before he was motivated enough. Glad to see the results. Now, what we need is an all situation parachute solution. be it eject mechanism like jets , or whatever , what matters is that even in a case of explosion, fire, storm it'll take people to safety. Oh, and we want it for passenger planes !! good luck !
How much does it cost to have one installed?
10sbowden 2 weeks ago
And then you pay 20,000 to rearm the parachute
karkuten 3 weeks ago
@MynameisElliot
it depends on the circumstances under which you have to do a forced landing and the fields quality. in some cases it is impossible to land your aircraft for example when you've lost control because a rudder is blocked. in this case the parachute would safe your life. a forced landing on a normal field is a high risk which could cause high damages not only to the airplane but also to its crew. if you try to land on a wet field you could easily rip off the landing gear or roll ove
edlkAviator 1 month ago
@floridaskater07 See comment below
LordsOfLanding 2 months ago
@jwboll. A cirrus will recover from an erect spin just fine and in fact are very difficult airplanes to enter a spin in.
LordsOfLanding 2 months ago
Is a parachute that much safer than a forced landing in a field? I ask because I'm learning how to do PFLs at the moment for my private license, but I'm learning to do them in a 1970's C-152!
MynameisElliott 3 months ago
The only thing that worries me is that with this installed, the emphisis of keeping failures from happening to begin with may become lax. "Well, we don't need to improve that, if it fails, there's a parachute to save the day" mentallity may start to take hold. It's a nice feature, but eliminating engine failures and pilot error should be the number one priority.
sixstringfretter 5 months ago
@sixstringfretter i completely agree with you people will give a bit of slack because of the chute during preflights and people will miss stuff you would ordinaroly find like a loose screw.
kondakor1998 5 months ago
Yep. According to these guys, they claim that they have save over a hundred planes with close to 300 people. I wish I could see what the reasons for all those failures were. Bet you alot of it is stupid shit that the owners just screwed up.
sixstringfretter 5 months ago
I think it should be mandatory on all planes! Hurry and perfect the technology so the large commercial planes can have these as well! It would give me a great deal of peace of mind when flying! I'd rather hear about this happening instead of having more peanuts offered on my flights!
hakaufma 8 months ago
Just think of the size parachute needed for a small commercial aircraft, goodness gracious.
drbackjack 9 months ago
30000 thousand planes in use
and 200 hundred parachutes used ?
that sounds pretty high
minored360 9 months ago
@minored360 they have been selling them for hang gliders, ultralights, homebuilts for a years. Cirrus is the first certified aircraft to install them in their planes to compensate for the unrecoverable spin problem.
jwboll 8 months ago
awesome what els can i say ??????
truck501 10 months ago
Would be pretty cool if Diamond Aircraft implements these too! I would probably get a Cirrus over a Diamond Star right now but only because of the chute!! I also saw that the Terrafugia will have parachutes too, I wonder if they will be using Boris Popov's chutes too!?
ElijahLynn 10 months ago
DULUTH!
sphinx245 10 months ago
This is basically a flying bomb?
AKPride00 11 months ago
@AKPride00 you know nothing about explosives.
tommangan7 10 months ago 2
Excellent technology. I was actually involved in a forced landing/crash caused by an engine failure about a year ago, fortunately, my friend and I both walked away from it with only minor injuries. Often a safe landing can be made in the event of an engine failure, but there are situations where that is not the case. At those times having BRS as an option could be the difference between life and death.
JustPlaneNuts 11 months ago
First really? every UL in europe is forced to have a parachute for the whole plane. years befor this brave american invited this "first". be ashamed m*therf*cker!
yahbluez 1 year ago
@yahbluez haha I don't give a damn
SlimySnail44 11 months ago
First really? every UL in europe is forced to have a parachute for the whole plane. years befor this brave american invited this "first". be ashamed motherfucker!
yahbluez 1 year ago
The Cirrus has them installed on all of their aircraft because they are prone to unrecoverable spins! The Challenger II I fly has one installed and I am Grateful its there.
floridaskater07 1 year ago
I can't believe the fallacies in this video. It is wrong that the parachute saves the plane. It's goal is to save the pilot, the plane usually gets damaged on impact. The reason is that it is much safer to lower the plane on a chute then have the pilot bail out - they can get injured or killed, or may not be able to bail out at all because of the G-forces. The exception is when the plane is on fire - in this case personal chutes are better.
rolfen 1 year ago
@rolfen Yes, they do use the term "save the airplane" however, it is clear the meaning is that they are saving the airplane in order to save the passengers.
In a light aircraft there is hardly room for individual 'chutes for each passenger. And getting out of airplanes not designed to get out of mid-air, especially at the low altitudes light planes generally fly at, is hardly a good idea.
It is not a fallacy, it's just not the most accurate or clear wording.
music2myear 1 year ago
When it comes to saving lives... this is probably the most wonderful of all inventions and Popov can certainly be proud of this achievement.
One can only imagine too, how many hundreds of lives can be saved if he cracks a 'chute' designed to save something the size of the new A380... !
Here's to all those who said it couldn't be done.
tauheke 1 year ago 3
as a search and rescuer it makes my job easier to see a plane from the air for our air crews because of the white and red of the parachute i aplaude what you are doing at BRS
-GAWNG
CAP
youngestpilotinGa 1 year ago
The "Slider": a simple, elegant solution which follows the KISS principle.
suretobringskills 1 year ago
@suretobringskills couldn't agree more
youngestpilotinGa 1 year ago
What if the part containing the parachute is ripped off if the plane is somehow severed in a mid-air jackknife? I personally think this is a brilliant invention but everyone flying should have their own personal parachutes as a backup - if I'm correct this is law in Germany.
misterbonzai08 1 year ago
Another proof that this system really works...It just saved an Argentine pilot that rip his plane in mid air last week...Amazing!!
rhoyboi 1 year ago
Give that guy a medal
peanuts2105 1 year ago
I`am looking at learning to fly. I`am not fond of hights to say the least but its something I always wanted to do. I think the parachute idea is great but after checking out all the deployments online, most people still suffer serious injury or die after deploying it. Better than nothing though I suppose.
gigantojim 1 year ago
@gigantojim How do they still suffer serious injury or death when the parachute deploys?
Apollo580 1 year ago
@Apollo580 If you check out the whole thing, there is a page on the net that tells you every time it has been deployed and what the outcome was etc. Read that, then comment back. Not always the parachute`s fault though, must admit.
gigantojim 1 year ago
@gigantojim if it is placed to far away from the CG then it can cause a nose down position or a tail down position, no one has had fatal problems but their can be mild back injury which would result in a bruise
FlyHighRC386 1 year ago
you still can glide your airplane to a safe landing spot you lazy pilots
gustavo87467357 1 year ago 3
@gustavo87467357 hell yea u can, if u lose ur engine, pilots need to stop acting like this is their only option. Ever heard of a deadstick landing jezus christ.
XxMartialArtistxX 1 year ago
@XxMartialArtistxX
go fuck yourself. what if the situation is unrecoverable. turning stall departing pattern from a soft field (still gaining airspeed) and your engine quits. hmmmmmm..... where the fuck am i gonna go. spin stall trying to get back to the runway, or right into the pine tees at the forward threshold of the departed runway.......hmmmmmm CAPS comes in handy
beechcraft12 1 year ago
@beechcraft12 First of all lemme ask you this, have you flown a cirrus? If your turning departing a pattern you have to try to stall this thing, and if you stall from turning because the pilot is a dumbass like you and didnt read the stall speeds at angles of bank, i can see why you might need this parachute. Btw if your engine quit and your way above the runway, have you thought of mayb pitching the nose down and finding a suitable landing spot, btw the caps has only been tested at 900ft agl
XxMartialArtistxX 1 year ago
@XxMartialArtistxX
word.
beechcraft12 1 year ago
@XxMartialArtistxX
I'm not taking sides here but let me just point out that you are coming off as the asshole here.
maintheradio 1 year ago
@beechcraft12 fuckin retard
XxMartialArtistxX 1 year ago
@XxMartialArtistxX Mr. martialartist, go spin kick your ass outta here and leave me alone. you made your point.
beechcraft12 1 year ago
@beechcraft12 Exactly so stfu
XxMartialArtistxX 1 year ago
@XxMartialArtistxX fuck off prick.
beechcraft12 1 year ago
@beechcraft12 People like you should be banned from flying with the type of aeronautical knowledge you have. Do the world a favor and stay out of a plane dumbshit
XxMartialArtistxX 1 year ago
@XxMartialArtistxX fuck off, you piece of shit troll. btw, i earned my wings with the same knowledge as everyone else that is licensed to fly. its not just given to random people, dumbshit. i encourage you to go try it, its a fun hobby/job etc. :)
beechcraft12 1 year ago
@beechcraft12 i know its not given to random people, i know theres alot more training involved, and i know its a good hobby/job. Idk if u can look up other pilots numbers, but if u dont beleive me ill be more than happy to prove to you i have my license as well ;)
XxMartialArtistxX 1 year ago
@XxMartialArtistxX You are probably the most ignorant person I've seen. There was an instance where an aircraft was cutoff by another towing a glider - the wire clipped the wing clean off- CAPS is what kept the guy alive. Go ahead and try and deadstick a one winged aircraft not capable of 300+ kts... Idiot.
goodgamejackass 1 year ago
we love these birds at Western Michigan University... i think we have about 25 of them. I got to pull the caps in the sim the other day :-)
DarkKitten878 1 year ago
The pilot manual for Cirrus SR22 states that deployment may cause serious injury or death! Emergency section, 3-20 I think. Oh great... and that the impact is the same as dropping the aircraft 13 feet high from the ground! Not a fan, not just because of those reasons, but the stick is awful, the throttle is a power lever... not interested.
pilotfokker320 1 year ago
Does anyone know if a similar system is in development for commercial airliners? I mean i would literally pay hundreds more knowing that there is at least some hope of survival in the remote case something aweful happens.
vojkanstrasni 1 year ago
@vojkanstrasni I'm with you but I think this was looked at back in the 70s and the added weight and cost was considered uneconomical.
hogey74 1 year ago
@vojkanstrasni Hallelujah! I wish someone else thought this... ;-)
misterbonzai08 1 year ago
For anyone that is interested, google Cirrus Aircraft parachute deployments, there is a complete list of the usages of this system and each pilot and the people aboard the aircraft, location and parameters of the reason for deployment. Excellent work BRS and Cirrus A/C!! Awesome idea.
BuzzDyou 1 year ago
@BuzzDyou Awesome indeed. Reading some of the deployment incidents though I can't help but think the next revisions of Cirrus aircraft should employ black boxes to record what caused the plane to lose control and whether the parachute was fired by choice or whether it shot out for no reason!
misterbonzai08 1 year ago
Chutes on commercial a/c? What are the chances that both of the engines go out.
all4golf 1 year ago
I'm pilot training in an SR20! It is so freakin cool!
sushi064 1 year ago
This is amazing - I hope it will also be available for commercial jets.
uralus 1 year ago
love the cirrus! did up to my instrument and commercial single engine add on in it and now a proud owner of a cirrus xi
tonez182 1 year ago
The Cirrus is the first plane I have owned that my wife will let me take BOTH kids at once... because of the Chute! Proud owner of C-GOPX, 2002 Sr-20.
PlasticRocket 1 year ago 28
@PlasticRocket I also recommend you have personal chutes available in the case of mid-air fire.
rolfen 1 year ago
our school is getting 3 of SR22's next month!
mupsilaama 1 year ago
this is the way forward, I hate it when people give up before trying, many said this sort of thing couldn't be done, this dude had to go through an incident before he was motivated enough. Glad to see the results. Now, what we need is an all situation parachute solution. be it eject mechanism like jets , or whatever , what matters is that even in a case of explosion, fire, storm it'll take people to safety. Oh, and we want it for passenger planes !! good luck !
semo2010 2 years ago
@semo2010 Agreed!
misterbonzai08 1 year ago
It cost me $20,000 to install one on my 2004 Cessna 182-T but I'm happy to see that red handle everytime I leave the ground!!
Sunrunner6993 2 years ago 55
Amazing!
MichuNeo 2 years ago