get top boxing exuipment at great prices in the uk, featuring brands such as lonsdale, grant, cleto reyes, everlast, pro box, adiddas, and more at..... fightoutlet.co.uk
Frog has create new style for boxing: flinging and running like hell. He even lost to that danish slow puncher. I just wonder why british working class idiots are worshipping this combtooth blenny.
Dirrell won almost every round.I gave 1 to Froch for pitty.Froch is no match for Dirrell.If it were in america we all know who would have won that figh.The only reson Dirrell did not win is because of the fact that he was fighting in Froch's home town.
Dirrell won almost every round.I gave 1 to Froch for pitty.Froch is no match for Dirrell.If it were in america we all know who would have won that figh.The only reson Dirrell did not win is because of the fact that he was fighting in Froch's home town.
dirrel had froch beat on speed and accuracy but unfortuantly dirrel spent 90% of the fight running and hugging, shame on you rember the stevens fight dirrel, what an embarrsment.
Dirrell won't win against Abraham with his "run and hug" technique. He will need to stand his ground. There were enough close rounds against Froch that the champ clearly got the benefit of the doubt because he was pressing the fight. Dirrell only has himself to blame - but if he decides to trade with Abraham he will be quickly KO'ed... Dirrell just isn't experienced enough to be in this tourney...
IMO i think Andre dirrel deserved to loose because he went about the fight in worng way, less holding and running & using more of his technical boxing skills (which he has) would have earned him the decision, he has only him self to blame for not wining the fight. Come on Carl good luck againt Kessler in April. Cant wait!!!!!
FIY stupid brits, it's called sticking and moving, not running. This sport is called BOXING. Dirrell is a BOXER, meaning he uses his head, moves around the ring and picks the right moment when to attack and when to counter. Froch is a dumb brawler. He's slow, thows punches mindlessly (no technical BOXING skills at all), and he keeps his hands down at the worst possible moment. If he keeps doing that against top level competition, he's gonna get knocked into a comatose state like ricky hatton.
If your truly a boxing enthusiast, then you know that Dirrell won this fight. Froch got outworked practically the whole fight by an "amateur" (according to Froch). the total punch stats weren't even close. He only got the win because he was in his hometown. had it been anywhere else, Dirrell would have won by unanimous decision. I just wish Andre Ward could fight Froch because he would be school him so bad that Froch wouldn't even get a decision win at home, thats how bad he would get whooped.
direll was running round the ring like a school boy bitch, when he stood toe to toe he would frow a thew shots then fucking run off, you aint gunna win a title like that, you have to fucking earn it, but obviously all you inbreds no more than the judges when you say direll should of won.
Lets just say that he hit Froch flush way more times. Froch was just so slow and wreckless. Pure BS. Yea hugged a lot, but still. BS is BS unless you're from Nottingham, England.
It doesn't matter how you look at a boxers style of fighting, its still boxing. Thats what makes boxing entertaining to watch. Direll may have the moves of a boxer but in the end of the day, Froch won the fight. His fight record shows that his style IS boring but it gives him WINS, and if you watch every fights he has done, he is conservative which saves a lot of energy, it suits well for the man who has limited punching ability. Though I must admit, the bastard sure hits hard and accurate.
RibenaSpring, your a joke as is froch. You obviously know nothing about boxing because you can't add in anything of value in your statements. FROCH WON! GET OVER IT. THATS ALL YOU CAN SAY....dumb brit Froch is no more than an unskilled brawler (like hatton). He was clearly frustrated during the post fight interview blaming dirrell for the fight being boring. It was boring because he didn't have the speed or skill to land punches on dirrell. All he is a brawler, no boxing skills at all.
dirrel was robbed just like pauli carl froch actually is a shitty ass fighter jermaine is washed up and everyone no"s that really no accomplish ment ppl are saying he ran but i thought the sport was called boxing its about strategy not throwing wild ass punches like froch did he used dirty tactics he deducted a point from andre for holding but nothing for all the late punches rematch in the states prove how much better dirrel is he was smileing at how slow froch was watch the 10th round and 11h
Ignore Ribena folks, he's from Nottingham and will try to sugar coat anything that Carl Froch does. He can't take the fact that since winning the title his performances have been dreadful. Froch is possibly the worst British world champion I have ever seen apart from Gavin Reece. At this rate he won't hold onto his title for long . I bet Ribena even thought Froch would have beat Calzaghe.
I've been a big fan of froch up until this fight where i have to say he was dire, he really didnt know how to handle the faster sharper and younger guy. He sloathed around the ring like a neandathol looking for the big shots and didn't have a plan b in mind. i'm sure dirrell worked out a game plan to beat carl froch and in my mind it worked to a T. Having said this, froch will have better success landing against the likes of Abraham or kessler, should make for a better fight.
and you preferred Dirrells pussy tactics LOL, says alot about you. you will find Dirrell can employ them tactics against just about most if not all SMW, in th bigger picture Froch did pretty good considering
froch is a bum and kessler is going to obliterate him. then i think he has to fight abraham and then his tournament will be over. say what you want to about how direll fought but what you cant say is that froch looked anywhere near impressive. hes about to get a taste of reality. hes not a champion.
i dont think you get it, no body would look impressive fighting Dirrell, he could fight like that with most if not all SMW's, Dirrell doesnt fight like a champ, Kessler wont contently hold or run so us boxing fans will get to watch a good fight
@dpensfan511 hahahahahahahahahahaha. kessler-froch was one of the fights of the year.. and abraham was completely fucking owned by froch. get back in your hole.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i am a froch fan and i think hes bulked too much he was alot faster than this or maybe its cos his last 3 fights have been adainst fast middleweight boxers. the kessler fight is gonna be miles different than this 1 u gonna see 2 big supermiddle weights punch the crap out of each other
Haha!! Its obvious to me my friend that you dont have a clue "Wot" ie What' your on about when it comes to boxing, and i dont even need to swear about it!
Boxers are always built up on easy fights with journymen or forreiners with made up titles, thats why up to now you feel frock was fast!lol! But ther comes a day that they have to fight a proper fight' and as you can see it results in your fast frock becoming slow and docile as he always has been! I'l throw in "fuking" for good measure lol!!
Dirrell has the speed and movement that Froch doesnt have and Froch has the power, heart and is a warrior loke spirit Dirrell could only dream of having, Dirrell has a good defense and Froch likes to go to war
If Froch likes to go to war perhaps he should enlist because this is boxing, the sweet science, hit and don't get hit....there's more to it than standing toe to toe trading shots!! Dirrell is a talent who will go further than Froch for sure.
hit and not get hit you say but how does that work when he constantly holds, so you will find he hasn't quite got the "sweet science" right just yet lol and if you think he has then you would be comparing him to Ali and im sure you wouldnt agree with that, would you ?
Ali wtf are you talking about?Just FYI Froch was holding Dirrel too ,The fact that the Brits wont release the punch stat numbers for the fight is interesting.Bottom line Dirrel landed more punches period ..by a lot go back and watch the fight..BOTH fighters commited fouls in the fight yet only one was penalized.This is a biasd tourney the American figherters have no chance being that they are boxers and the Europeans are sluggers..The american boxers are dub for entering this tourney
bottom line is Froch won, yeah people compare him to Ali and Maywether saying he has the sweet science when he cant attract like Ali and the rest of them lol, so you need to be commenting back at the Dirrell fans who claim this lol, they talk about the sweet science and they dont even know what it means, there was no way Dirrell won that fight and he didnt deserve to
I think it's you that does not know what the sweet science means! Answer this question..Scoring a fight is based on 1. Ring generalship, 2. "Effective" agression, 3. Defense, & 4. Clean Punches landed, so based on this how the hell can anyone say Froch won that fight??!! Dirrell made Foch fight his fight, he was more effective although he was on the backfoot, his defense was excellent & he outlanded Froch 2:1. He also hurt Froch twice!!
because i dont want to i havent got time listening to all you bad losers, answer me this and i will answer you gay questions, so are you saying Dirrell has the Sweet science like Ali and Mayweather ? lol,,,,,,, John Duddy
You are asking me "Has Dirrell GOT the sweet science like Ali?"!!! And you are saying I don't know what it means!!! You don't HAVE the sweet science you fool! The sweet science is a phrase used to describe boxing. Some people know how to implement the sweet science, like Direll, some do not, like Froch. And what has John Duddy got to do with this conversation? Stop trying to change the subject Ribena Spring, we are talking about Froch & Dirrell.
lol your a joke, i fucking know that you tool, its a phase used to describe a way of boxing thats being used by Dirrell fans, going on like Dirrell fought that way against Froch so my point is Ali etc showed the sweet science when he fought and if thats the case they are comparing Dirrell to Ali and Dirrell is nothing like Ali, get over it Celtic Cutie Pie
I'm a joke? You are asking me if Dirrell has the sweet science & I'm a joke?!! It is not a phrase to describe "a way" of boxing, it is a phrase to describe boxing full stop! In case you did not know, boxing is about more than just plodding forward like a fucking zombie like Froch does!!! Dirrell won the fight just as Haye won the fight against Valuev, by using defense, skill, speed, etc. If you think Dirrell lost then you must also agree that Haye should have lost right?
You cannot answer a simple question. You know nothing about boxng. I proved you wrong & you have no answer. Dirrell should have won & everyone knows it. Get over that idiot!
Who won ? who is unbeaten ? thank you, 3 pro judges scored it,
watch Haye and you will see how to beat a champ, dont forget haye moved alot im the ring but thats the tactics he had to use fighting someone over 7 stone heavier and didnt have to constantly grab, unlike Dirrell who spoiled the fight against someone who weights the same weight and used them tactics in EVERY fight, lol
no it is you who doesnt have a clue, umm i think Froch won and he did so GET OVER IT lol, you can comment back all your life if it helps you but you cant change the FACT froch won
Can't you get your point across without cursing? that says a lot about you. As for David Haye, he fought the exact same fight as Andre Dirrell did against Froch. The only difference here was that the judges gave it to the guy with the so called "pussy" tactics and not the bigger stronger champion who walked forward looking more aggressive, throwing more punches, trying to make a fight of it. Ok so Valuev missed most of the night but so did Froch against Direll.
Haye fought someone over 7 stone heavier and had to use them tactics and he never had to hold, Haye will change his approach for the next fight as he does not fight like that in all his fights, unlike Dirrell who has the same game plan in all his fights and spoils them and only look to defend because he cant bang, so if your saying he was the same as Haye then you haven't got a clue, sorry
He can't bang? But he had Froch doing a little dance in the 11th round!! It doesn't matter how big the opponent is, the fact is Dirrell beat Froch using the same tactics Haye used on Valuev. Haye was running all night & Valuev is not even a big puncher! Do you realise that the smaller guy should actually fight on the inside against the bigger guy? Why didn't Haye do that? lol! You have shown that you have little knowedge on the subject so maybe you should comment on something you know about!
Ribena Spring, you keep saying shit with nothing to back it up. YOU DON'T KNOW BOXING!!! Everything I said is 100% accurate. Prove me wrong or STFU!!! What did I say that is inaccurate??? You can't tell me can you?!
First of your saying Haye fought like Dirrell LOL - WRONG,
Also you said "Do you realise that the smaller guy should actually fight on the inside against the bigger guy? Why didn't Haye do that?" - what has that to do with it ? what are you trying to prove, you are Wrong again and trying to tell me what you think Haye should of done even tho he WON you loser, your not worth a debate your knowledge is amusing, GET OVER IT. you are fighting a losing battle, face it, when will you get over it?
Evander Holyfield showed how the smaller guy should fight Valuev, by getting close and trading.Haye barely won in most peoples eyes.Haye fought of the backfoot and used his defense, just like Dirrell. I am 100% correct on these points. You are deluded and are changing your tune now that a British fighter used the same "pussy" tactics that you've been deriding Dirrell for using on Froch!! You are clueless and you cannot face facts!! I've already won bitch because you keep contradicting yourself!!
whats your problem lol, you still not over it yet,
Ok if it helps lets just pretend Dirrell won and Froch is not unbeaten, you might be able to get a good nights sleep...... im over the Froch lose already lol
Slagging off our sporting ability? How many gold medals did our tiny country win at the 08 Olympics eh? We came 4th in the world to the largest, most populated and economically powerful countries. But our great sporting achievements shine through. A win is a win. Get over it.. Lewis, Calzaghe, Froch, Haye, Eubank, plus many more champions over the years have outboxed the best on the Planet. Bruno beat Tyson in his prime, but he was cheated on a 13 sec count! But we don't bitch about it!
99% of the time americans have home crowd advantage, 99% of dodgy decisions they benefit from
One goes the other way (yes it did - Dirrell should have won)...and the sport of boxing is in disrepute
Other countries should just not bother, just make it an american sport....Froch and Kessler should not have bought two world title belts into this tournament...they should just be US national belts...the boxing would still be Ok...apart from heavyweights
Dirrell had mr Frock well beaten! by throwing and connecting hundreds of times and even nearly knocking frock out!!
Thi only reply from frock was a few fresh air shots!! This was a disgaceful desition as usual in england!! Brings boxing into disrepute!! Dirrell was completly robbed!!
He made mr frock out to be an amature to say the least!!
Well i might score Mr Frock 3 shots maybe, but yes Dirrel scored "Hundreds" Brilliant Skill and one shot nearly Knocked Frock out Clean!!! But as usual the english boxer of course will get the decision to save face!! "Disgraceful to say the least!! "Rematch!!!!!Rematch!! in a neutural country! Mr Frock dare not Rematch as he knows he would loss!!
terrible decision by referree Andre Dirrell gave one punch Froch a lesson. He landed the clean punches. Froch was slow and rabbit punching.
Even his interview after the fight was poor. "This was a tough night at the office" then next "I could have gone 25 rounds at this pace it was easy".
Froch may be a bit puncher, but he has no idea about a combination. A jab or two and quicker feet and much better to watch than a guy who tracks the other guy with a cocked right hand.
froch is well over rated, he defo didnt beat dirrell and wouldnt of beat taylor if it wasnt for the fight being stopped, hes far to slow with shit defence, kessler will smash him
if anyone knows anything then they would no dirrell won that fight, he picked froch of whole fight and made him miss... froch hardly landed anything, fucking hometown decisions once again. kessler will smash froch
im not quite sure how this fight was scored?? direll was very messy and moning pretty much through the whole fight which was dissapointing on his behalf however,... this man way out classed froch who, without doubt has power but no where near the skill he believes he has!! all this fight proved is how little talent froch has at world level, ive not seen such a big headed fighter perform so average, if direll wasnt acting a tart it would have been froch's big embarrasment!!
Dirrell may win the rematch but he didn't win this fight. The stink-it-up hugfest was Dirrell's doing. Froch also was consistent to the body and his jab was getting through nearly every time he threw it. I saw the fight with both US and UK commentary - it's interesting how people see things differently. Dirrell held Froch right after he buzzed him with a punch. That's not gonna win a belt from the champ - ever.
dirrell landed 280 punches and froch landed 39. the stats speak for themselves. i do not know wat people were watchin to say hat froch won....i wanted froch to win but that was the shittest performance iv ever seen from him ever. dirrell deserves that belt
Even Froch's corner told him he needed a knockout before the start of the 12th -- If the 10th round had been a few seconds longer, Froch would have been stopped.
Dirrell did exactly what a BOXER is supposed to do, HIT without being hit back. Froch, the BRAWLER, could never catch up to him and therefore resorted to dirty tactics, This is the SPORT of BOXING, the sweet science, and it is judged on a round-by-round basis. It is not a summary determined at the end of the fight
damn did anybody watch the same fight i did thats boxing and dirrell not only would have won in the us if they fought here but he boxed beautifuly but ward knockin all they ass out lol
Not saying he didn´t clinch, and froch didn´t win a few rounds, but like i said, ref didn´t give him a choice, and clinching isn´t worse then Frochs illegal punches.
I´m not neccessary a fan of dirrel but he won that fight. Dirrel was the better fighter and scored the more points.
And he won those rounds. That´s exactly how you fight someone like froch. He made him look like a freaking amateur, and then out of frustration came the cheap shots. Pure and simple, froch was out boxed. You wanna live the lie and pretend otherwise, just because he clinched his way through a few rounds. They all do that mate
we do end on a disagrement though, cause i think people are turning off boxing because of fighters like Froch. And if you don´t like defensive boxers, you´re gonna absolutely hate Kessler:-)
I acknowledge that buddy. Everyone sees things differently so I respect you opinions. Nah Froch as you say is a brawler and would probably suit the pikey UFC lol.
Lets just hope the remaining fights are really good.
at the end of the day.. you score when u connect which is what dirrell done to froch, froch may have been the aggressor but he hardly landed anything, dirrell landed alot more.. and so what if he was using hit a run tactics, at the end of the day the more eye catchin work was from dirrelland he landed alot more, he was robbed.
if ur honest wiv urself m8, dirrell won that fight. dunno how people r making excuses, yeh he held on, n yea he likes to use the ring but he won, comfortably! big up Carl Froch for being a big let down!
I'm being honest..I'm saying I cane see a cas that Dirrell won by a round or 2 but what makes us laugh is how peopl like you say "yeh he held on, n yea he likes to use the ring "
Err, holding is illegal and wil eventually result in dissqualification so too will turning your body and inviting the opponent to rabit punch. That's not to mwntion the jumping on the floor lol
The fact that some people find this exciting is kinda sad...
lol i remember the name? I tried to score that and found it very hard. I think Froch took the first few rounds with the jab but then Kess started comming back. I personally thought that fight was so tight that it could of gone either way and so I have no complaints. Froch can't complain because he was lucky with the descision against Dirrell and he simply didn't do enough. 117 - 111 is ridiculous though lol.
Have you heard what Froch has said? He has said that if the next fight is not in UK he will leave the tourny. I do think that's stupid after him going on about how he will fight anybody anywhere although the only thing I disagree with is using that judge who scored the Svenn Ottke vs Robin fight. He was the guy who scored it 117 to Kessler the other night.
boxing is an art and a science.why should dirrel stand and brawl with a man who is bigger and stronger than him?brawling is also part of that science when done correctly as well as a dirty shot here and there (hopkins)but to let froch hit behind the head at will and not take a point away is wrong no matter how you look at it.dirrel landed the harder cleaner shots all night the video doesnt lie.froch was the agressor but his agressivenes was not effective enough to have won this fight.
That's where we differ. Yes Dirrell was at times amazing by the way he avoided Carls power shots but that doesn't physically score points.
Dirrell landed the head shots where as Carl landed the body shots.
I believe Dirrell was 'robbed' coz in the first half of the fight he just ran and then in the latter part he consistantly held, slipped evertime they got close.
He tried to stink his way to the belt so he deserved what he got in my opinion.
The ref should have taken a point from Froch too. Very early on actually, but seeing that he didn´t, and he allowed froch his cheap shots Dirrel didn´t have much of a choice but to duck and cover. He would have been killed by frochs albovs and back of the head punching.
Mate you need to look at the fight again. Cause Froch started very early on with the cheap shots. Dude gets frustrated easy. And i don´t think they´re scared of him. a natural respect for his power, but not afraid. And Dirrel is not a nazi:-)
No it wont. It´s gonna be a boring fight. The one good thing you can say about froch v dirrel. It may not have been pretty, but at least it had some intencity to it.
You think so?I can see someone getting KO'd in that fight. As for the Dirrell fight...had Dirrell of fought the way he did in the 11th for the whole fight then yes, it would of been a very good fight and Dirrell would of won so long as the Cobra didn't manage to land a bomb.
Actually it is. Making your opponent miss. pretty much the essence of boxing. And maybe you ought to check out Kesslers record list. Looks impressive from a far. But a closer look. not that much. Calzaghe and Mundine and that´s pretty much it. The rest are second rate fighters.
Boxing is exciting because of Mayweather and fighters like him 29Gixxer just mad because he blows Froch and his other fighters up because of Lacy and Jermaine two fucking bums. Any fair minded person know Froch loss and he's a bum that will be defeated again promise.
Maybe he is a weak champ. He won't be champ when this tournament is over. However, Dirrell did not give a championship performance. I mean, even if Dirrell had gotten the decision, he'd still look like a weak champ. He just didn't fight like a champ...at all.
He beat the so called champ and hurt him the boy is young and will get better Froch a bum bottom line Allen Green should of had Jermaine spot dude been a bum never beat b-hop, winky, barely spinks
Froch is a bum Taylor is better than him just needs to condition better but taylor never beat hopkis or winky...but Direll gave Froch a boxing lesson my man got ripped off
Floyd the best but there are new comers like Dirrell, Ward, Antowe Smith, Peterson brothers, Alexander the great, Holt, Bradley, Berto, Williams, Clouds, Dawson, Kirkland and a few more. Froch is a bum and will be defeated again.
This has been flagged as spam show
get top boxing exuipment at great prices in the uk, featuring brands such as lonsdale, grant, cleto reyes, everlast, pro box, adiddas, and more at..... fightoutlet.co.uk
fightoutlet 5 months ago
Frog has create new style for boxing: flinging and running like hell. He even lost to that danish slow puncher. I just wonder why british working class idiots are worshipping this combtooth blenny.
saddoboxing1 5 months ago
@saddoboxing1 lol@ combtooth blenny.
mboaz5530 2 months ago
carl froch the new great white hope
xxxBALUCHISTANxxx 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ROBBERY
jummacob 5 months ago
Fucking judges should be ashamed of themselfs
ImatwFearsKnowan 1 year ago
this song reminds me of the movie boogie nights when kirk diggler was trying to imitate this type of music , i guess its gay 80s music
druha10304 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dirrell won almost every round.I gave 1 to Froch for pitty.Froch is no match for Dirrell.If it were in america we all know who would have won that figh.The only reson Dirrell did not win is because of the fact that he was fighting in Froch's home town.
BRAD4able 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dirrell won almost every round.I gave 1 to Froch for pitty.Froch is no match for Dirrell.If it were in america we all know who would have won that figh.The only reson Dirrell did not win is because of the fact that he was fighting in Froch's home town.
BRAD4able 1 year ago
Comment removed
BRAD4able 1 year ago
I love to see a dude get folded up by a body shot...
mookeychase0907 1 year ago
your right he puts most people in the uk asleep everytime he steps into the the ring.. He's that boring to watch his fights aren't even televised..
jester295 1 year ago
UNLUCKY FROCH YOUR SHIT
NickSolar 1 year ago
artur abraham is the best....name of this song????
flowkillerboxer22 2 years ago
@flowkillerboxer22 No easy way out. it was on Rocky 4 soundtrack, Noob.
toadman842 1 year ago
@toadman842 i know im just not remember the name,thanks.
flowkillerboxer22 1 year ago
dirrel had froch beat on speed and accuracy but unfortuantly dirrel spent 90% of the fight running and hugging, shame on you rember the stevens fight dirrel, what an embarrsment.
membland 2 years ago
Dirrell>Froch aka Toucan sam
Andre got robbed, Froch wasnt landing anything.
Chex2331 2 years ago
Dirrell won't win against Abraham with his "run and hug" technique. He will need to stand his ground. There were enough close rounds against Froch that the champ clearly got the benefit of the doubt because he was pressing the fight. Dirrell only has himself to blame - but if he decides to trade with Abraham he will be quickly KO'ed... Dirrell just isn't experienced enough to be in this tourney...
bobbypfalcon 2 years ago
IMO i think Andre dirrel deserved to loose because he went about the fight in worng way, less holding and running & using more of his technical boxing skills (which he has) would have earned him the decision, he has only him self to blame for not wining the fight. Come on Carl good luck againt Kessler in April. Cant wait!!!!!
IronMansho 2 years ago
Ward and Abraham would school them both thesse guys dont ahve a chance in the finals. ABraham is going to knock Dirrel out this next fight.
destructo1080 2 years ago
FIY stupid brits, it's called sticking and moving, not running. This sport is called BOXING. Dirrell is a BOXER, meaning he uses his head, moves around the ring and picks the right moment when to attack and when to counter. Froch is a dumb brawler. He's slow, thows punches mindlessly (no technical BOXING skills at all), and he keeps his hands down at the worst possible moment. If he keeps doing that against top level competition, he's gonna get knocked into a comatose state like ricky hatton.
xBOSSxMODEx 2 years ago
They don't get it dude! Unless of course it's Haye sticking and moving..then it's ok!
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
Haye backed-up against Valuev, which is probably the only fight you've seen of him based on this comment.
There is no other way to box a fighter who is over 7 foot and 20 odd stone!!
simondgrass 2 years ago
Backing up the entire fight isn't the way to take a title.
simondgrass 2 years ago
Also, Hatton is chinny. You can't knock Froch out! His chin is granite.
simondgrass 2 years ago
Taylor floored him, Dirrell had him hurt...yeah man, granite chin for sure!!!
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
Yeah with shots that woulda koed most men!
simondgrass 2 years ago
But he took them and ended winning both fights, therefore showing he can take a punch. Idiot.
MmmKellyKapowski 1 year ago
If your truly a boxing enthusiast, then you know that Dirrell won this fight. Froch got outworked practically the whole fight by an "amateur" (according to Froch). the total punch stats weren't even close. He only got the win because he was in his hometown. had it been anywhere else, Dirrell would have won by unanimous decision. I just wish Andre Ward could fight Froch because he would be school him so bad that Froch wouldn't even get a decision win at home, thats how bad he would get whooped.
xBOSSxMODEx 2 years ago
direll was running round the ring like a school boy bitch, when he stood toe to toe he would frow a thew shots then fucking run off, you aint gunna win a title like that, you have to fucking earn it, but obviously all you inbreds no more than the judges when you say direll should of won.
stooblay 2 years ago
Lets just say that he hit Froch flush way more times. Froch was just so slow and wreckless. Pure BS. Yea hugged a lot, but still. BS is BS unless you're from Nottingham, England.
Can't wait for Kessler to Annihilate.
TurtLePimpin 2 years ago
froch=best middleweight boxer ever.
15kilkenny 2 years ago
It doesn't matter how you look at a boxers style of fighting, its still boxing. Thats what makes boxing entertaining to watch. Direll may have the moves of a boxer but in the end of the day, Froch won the fight. His fight record shows that his style IS boring but it gives him WINS, and if you watch every fights he has done, he is conservative which saves a lot of energy, it suits well for the man who has limited punching ability. Though I must admit, the bastard sure hits hard and accurate.
krayzee001 2 years ago
everyone look up the punch stats on utube for froch and dirrell
ARMONI555 2 years ago
being even english, froch didnt win that fight!! he has a lot of heart and great stamina but no natural ability!!
ezy227 2 years ago
RibenaSpring, your a joke as is froch. You obviously know nothing about boxing because you can't add in anything of value in your statements. FROCH WON! GET OVER IT. THATS ALL YOU CAN SAY....dumb brit Froch is no more than an unskilled brawler (like hatton). He was clearly frustrated during the post fight interview blaming dirrell for the fight being boring. It was boring because he didn't have the speed or skill to land punches on dirrell. All he is a brawler, no boxing skills at all.
xBOSSxMODEx 2 years ago 2
Actually Hatton is much better than Froch. He actually lands his punches.
TurtLePimpin 2 years ago 2
I think Taylor should retire for his own good, & be replaced by Pascal or Calzaghe (if he's got the balls, which I doubt it....) LOL
pink43560 2 years ago 2
dirrel was robbed just like pauli carl froch actually is a shitty ass fighter jermaine is washed up and everyone no"s that really no accomplish ment ppl are saying he ran but i thought the sport was called boxing its about strategy not throwing wild ass punches like froch did he used dirty tactics he deducted a point from andre for holding but nothing for all the late punches rematch in the states prove how much better dirrel is he was smileing at how slow froch was watch the 10th round and 11h
Z1ZJUNIORZ1Z 2 years ago
anyone know where i can see the whole fight without crappy music lol
ysgvssfdh 2 years ago 2
Ignore Ribena folks, he's from Nottingham and will try to sugar coat anything that Carl Froch does. He can't take the fact that since winning the title his performances have been dreadful. Froch is possibly the worst British world champion I have ever seen apart from Gavin Reece. At this rate he won't hold onto his title for long . I bet Ribena even thought Froch would have beat Calzaghe.
cossy1981 2 years ago
shut up dpensfan u fukin idiot talkin shit u fukin yank
billybwtc 2 years ago
I've been a big fan of froch up until this fight where i have to say he was dire, he really didnt know how to handle the faster sharper and younger guy. He sloathed around the ring like a neandathol looking for the big shots and didn't have a plan b in mind. i'm sure dirrell worked out a game plan to beat carl froch and in my mind it worked to a T. Having said this, froch will have better success landing against the likes of Abraham or kessler, should make for a better fight.
cossy1981 2 years ago 2
and you preferred Dirrells pussy tactics LOL, says alot about you. you will find Dirrell can employ them tactics against just about most if not all SMW, in th bigger picture Froch did pretty good considering
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
froch is a bum and kessler is going to obliterate him. then i think he has to fight abraham and then his tournament will be over. say what you want to about how direll fought but what you cant say is that froch looked anywhere near impressive. hes about to get a taste of reality. hes not a champion.
dpensfan511 2 years ago 3
i dont think you get it, no body would look impressive fighting Dirrell, he could fight like that with most if not all SMW's, Dirrell doesnt fight like a champ, Kessler wont contently hold or run so us boxing fans will get to watch a good fight
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
@dpensfan511... Hmmm. what's your opinion on him now? this is perfect proof of the kind of bullshit people spurt out.
TheHayemaker100 1 year ago
Good win by Froch he chased him around the ring all night.. You don`t win a title running away and hitting w/ soft shots
davgabe 1 year ago
@davgabe... Your right Froch is a warrior!
TheHayemaker100 1 year ago
@dpensfan511 hahahahahahahahahahaha. kessler-froch was one of the fights of the year.. and abraham was completely fucking owned by froch. get back in your hole.
bigdunk9 1 year ago
@dpensfan511
u look fuckin stupid now dont ya hahahaha yea froch got battered by both of em hahaha u dickhead
somerville1234 1 year ago
@dpensfan511 really??..i literally dont agree with anything you said...
whitebigpolarbear 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i am a froch fan and i think hes bulked too much he was alot faster than this or maybe its cos his last 3 fights have been adainst fast middleweight boxers. the kessler fight is gonna be miles different than this 1 u gonna see 2 big supermiddle weights punch the crap out of each other
Realdaddyuk 2 years ago
Bulked too much' lol! He is just naturaly "Slow" and 1 dimentional!!
And Yes" Kessler will punch the crap out of him!! Cant wait!
onlyonekind1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your comments just made me realise something.
u havent got a fuking clue wot your on about
Realdaddyuk 2 years ago
Haha!! Its obvious to me my friend that you dont have a clue "Wot" ie What' your on about when it comes to boxing, and i dont even need to swear about it!
Boxers are always built up on easy fights with journymen or forreiners with made up titles, thats why up to now you feel frock was fast!lol! But ther comes a day that they have to fight a proper fight' and as you can see it results in your fast frock becoming slow and docile as he always has been! I'l throw in "fuking" for good measure lol!!
onlyonekind1 2 years ago 2
Dirrell has the speed and movement that Froch doesnt have and Froch has the power, heart and is a warrior loke spirit Dirrell could only dream of having, Dirrell has a good defense and Froch likes to go to war
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
If Froch likes to go to war perhaps he should enlist because this is boxing, the sweet science, hit and don't get hit....there's more to it than standing toe to toe trading shots!! Dirrell is a talent who will go further than Froch for sure.
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
Defense is great, but Dirrell is a coward in the ring sometimes
rollerswartz 2 years ago
hit and not get hit you say but how does that work when he constantly holds, so you will find he hasn't quite got the "sweet science" right just yet lol and if you think he has then you would be comparing him to Ali and im sure you wouldnt agree with that, would you ?
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
Ali wtf are you talking about?Just FYI Froch was holding Dirrel too ,The fact that the Brits wont release the punch stat numbers for the fight is interesting.Bottom line Dirrel landed more punches period ..by a lot go back and watch the fight..BOTH fighters commited fouls in the fight yet only one was penalized.This is a biasd tourney the American figherters have no chance being that they are boxers and the Europeans are sluggers..The american boxers are dub for entering this tourney
NenoBrown24 2 years ago
bottom line is Froch won, yeah people compare him to Ali and Maywether saying he has the sweet science when he cant attract like Ali and the rest of them lol, so you need to be commenting back at the Dirrell fans who claim this lol, they talk about the sweet science and they dont even know what it means, there was no way Dirrell won that fight and he didnt deserve to
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
I think it's you that does not know what the sweet science means! Answer this question..Scoring a fight is based on 1. Ring generalship, 2. "Effective" agression, 3. Defense, & 4. Clean Punches landed, so based on this how the hell can anyone say Froch won that fight??!! Dirrell made Foch fight his fight, he was more effective although he was on the backfoot, his defense was excellent & he outlanded Froch 2:1. He also hurt Froch twice!!
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
the point is YOU DONT KNOW
Froch won Dirrell lost
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
You can't answer my question Ribena Spring so you are admitting that you don't know what the fuck you are on about!!
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
because i dont want to i havent got time listening to all you bad losers, answer me this and i will answer you gay questions, so are you saying Dirrell has the Sweet science like Ali and Mayweather ? lol,,,,,,, John Duddy
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
You are asking me "Has Dirrell GOT the sweet science like Ali?"!!! And you are saying I don't know what it means!!! You don't HAVE the sweet science you fool! The sweet science is a phrase used to describe boxing. Some people know how to implement the sweet science, like Direll, some do not, like Froch. And what has John Duddy got to do with this conversation? Stop trying to change the subject Ribena Spring, we are talking about Froch & Dirrell.
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
lol your a joke, i fucking know that you tool, its a phase used to describe a way of boxing thats being used by Dirrell fans, going on like Dirrell fought that way against Froch so my point is Ali etc showed the sweet science when he fought and if thats the case they are comparing Dirrell to Ali and Dirrell is nothing like Ali, get over it Celtic Cutie Pie
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
I'm a joke? You are asking me if Dirrell has the sweet science & I'm a joke?!! It is not a phrase to describe "a way" of boxing, it is a phrase to describe boxing full stop! In case you did not know, boxing is about more than just plodding forward like a fucking zombie like Froch does!!! Dirrell won the fight just as Haye won the fight against Valuev, by using defense, skill, speed, etc. If you think Dirrell lost then you must also agree that Haye should have lost right?
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
Froch won your boring me, get over it loser,
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
You cannot answer a simple question. You know nothing about boxng. I proved you wrong & you have no answer. Dirrell should have won & everyone knows it. Get over that idiot!
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
you cannot understand simple comments,
Who won ? who is unbeaten ? thank you, 3 pro judges scored it,
watch Haye and you will see how to beat a champ, dont forget haye moved alot im the ring but thats the tactics he had to use fighting someone over 7 stone heavier and didnt have to constantly grab, unlike Dirrell who spoiled the fight against someone who weights the same weight and used them tactics in EVERY fight, lol
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
You haven't got a clue pal, not a clue!!! Keep on fooling yourself you hypocrite!!!!
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
no it is you who doesnt have a clue, umm i think Froch won and he did so GET OVER IT lol, you can comment back all your life if it helps you but you cant change the FACT froch won
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
Can't you get your point across without cursing? that says a lot about you. As for David Haye, he fought the exact same fight as Andre Dirrell did against Froch. The only difference here was that the judges gave it to the guy with the so called "pussy" tactics and not the bigger stronger champion who walked forward looking more aggressive, throwing more punches, trying to make a fight of it. Ok so Valuev missed most of the night but so did Froch against Direll.
cossy1981 2 years ago
same tactics lol, come on your joking right
Haye fought someone over 7 stone heavier and had to use them tactics and he never had to hold, Haye will change his approach for the next fight as he does not fight like that in all his fights, unlike Dirrell who has the same game plan in all his fights and spoils them and only look to defend because he cant bang, so if your saying he was the same as Haye then you haven't got a clue, sorry
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
He can't bang? But he had Froch doing a little dance in the 11th round!! It doesn't matter how big the opponent is, the fact is Dirrell beat Froch using the same tactics Haye used on Valuev. Haye was running all night & Valuev is not even a big puncher! Do you realise that the smaller guy should actually fight on the inside against the bigger guy? Why didn't Haye do that? lol! You have shown that you have little knowedge on the subject so maybe you should comment on something you know about!
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
HAHAHAHA dude your comment just proves you dont have a clue,
GET OVER IT
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
Ribena Spring, you keep saying shit with nothing to back it up. YOU DON'T KNOW BOXING!!! Everything I said is 100% accurate. Prove me wrong or STFU!!! What did I say that is inaccurate??? You can't tell me can you?!
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
GET OVER IT
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
First of your saying Haye fought like Dirrell LOL - WRONG,
Also you said "Do you realise that the smaller guy should actually fight on the inside against the bigger guy? Why didn't Haye do that?" - what has that to do with it ? what are you trying to prove, you are Wrong again and trying to tell me what you think Haye should of done even tho he WON you loser, your not worth a debate your knowledge is amusing, GET OVER IT. you are fighting a losing battle, face it, when will you get over it?
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
Evander Holyfield showed how the smaller guy should fight Valuev, by getting close and trading.Haye barely won in most peoples eyes.Haye fought of the backfoot and used his defense, just like Dirrell. I am 100% correct on these points. You are deluded and are changing your tune now that a British fighter used the same "pussy" tactics that you've been deriding Dirrell for using on Froch!! You are clueless and you cannot face facts!! I've already won bitch because you keep contradicting yourself!!
celticcutiepie 2 years ago
Dont worry Celtic. Haye will meet Tua :-) No more running.
TurtLePimpin 2 years ago 2
@TurtLePimpin
How did Haye get involved in this thread? That fat tub of 39 year old lard ass aint gonna do shit lol. Haye's only worry is Vitali.
29Gixxer 1 year ago
Froch didn't win
Boxingmygame 2 years ago
whats your problem lol, you still not over it yet,
Ok if it helps lets just pretend Dirrell won and Froch is not unbeaten, you might be able to get a good nights sleep...... im over the Froch lose already lol
RibenaSpring 2 years ago
Slagging off our sporting ability? How many gold medals did our tiny country win at the 08 Olympics eh? We came 4th in the world to the largest, most populated and economically powerful countries. But our great sporting achievements shine through. A win is a win. Get over it.. Lewis, Calzaghe, Froch, Haye, Eubank, plus many more champions over the years have outboxed the best on the Planet. Bruno beat Tyson in his prime, but he was cheated on a 13 sec count! But we don't bitch about it!
liamardo007 2 years ago
well said ,I agree most people commenting that they think Froch won dont know shit about boxing..Its called boxing for a reason
NenoBrown24 2 years ago
There's basically no point in boxing anymore
99% of the time americans have home crowd advantage, 99% of dodgy decisions they benefit from
One goes the other way (yes it did - Dirrell should have won)...and the sport of boxing is in disrepute
Other countries should just not bother, just make it an american sport....Froch and Kessler should not have bought two world title belts into this tournament...they should just be US national belts...the boxing would still be Ok...apart from heavyweights
BillB808 2 years ago
Dirrell had mr Frock well beaten! by throwing and connecting hundreds of times and even nearly knocking frock out!!
Thi only reply from frock was a few fresh air shots!! This was a disgaceful desition as usual in england!! Brings boxing into disrepute!! Dirrell was completly robbed!!
He made mr frock out to be an amature to say the least!!
onlyonekind1 2 years ago
erm 100s of times. so if froch never hit him how come dirrell was cut and swollen
Realdaddyuk 2 years ago
Well i might score Mr Frock 3 shots maybe, but yes Dirrel scored "Hundreds" Brilliant Skill and one shot nearly Knocked Frock out Clean!!! But as usual the english boxer of course will get the decision to save face!! "Disgraceful to say the least!! "Rematch!!!!!Rematch!! in a neutural country! Mr Frock dare not Rematch as he knows he would loss!!
onlyonekind1 2 years ago
I'm English and I know that Froch lost on the night.
Froch is sh*t......he should be ashamed of his performance.
I say things how it is despite what nation fights.
Dirrell was robbed.
So much for judging.
nistelsoi 2 years ago
i don't think direll was robbed the win he was to defensiv but i agree with you that froch did not fight like a champion he fought dirty
xboxcake 2 years ago 2
terrible decision by referree Andre Dirrell gave one punch Froch a lesson. He landed the clean punches. Froch was slow and rabbit punching.
Even his interview after the fight was poor. "This was a tough night at the office" then next "I could have gone 25 rounds at this pace it was easy".
Froch may be a bit puncher, but he has no idea about a combination. A jab or two and quicker feet and much better to watch than a guy who tracks the other guy with a cocked right hand.
Dirrell was robbed
fataluser 2 years ago
It's one thing to use the ring but another to throw a piss poor jab and then run away. This is what dmaged Dirrells chance of winning.
In a rematch I do believe Dirrell would of learn't from this and so I predict a Dirrell win
29Gixxer 2 years ago
What we are saying is that you cannot expect to take the belt in that manner.
People need to read the rule book as Dirrell could of been dissqualified in round 7 after hugging 11 times :)
29Gixxer 2 years ago
Forgive the type errors, I'm typng without a light on.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
froch is well over rated, he defo didnt beat dirrell and wouldnt of beat taylor if it wasnt for the fight being stopped, hes far to slow with shit defence, kessler will smash him
boxinslegend 2 years ago
if anyone knows anything then they would no dirrell won that fight, he picked froch of whole fight and made him miss... froch hardly landed anything, fucking hometown decisions once again. kessler will smash froch
boxinslegend 2 years ago
im not quite sure how this fight was scored?? direll was very messy and moning pretty much through the whole fight which was dissapointing on his behalf however,... this man way out classed froch who, without doubt has power but no where near the skill he believes he has!! all this fight proved is how little talent froch has at world level, ive not seen such a big headed fighter perform so average, if direll wasnt acting a tart it would have been froch's big embarrasment!!
blish1000 2 years ago
Dirrell may win the rematch but he didn't win this fight. The stink-it-up hugfest was Dirrell's doing. Froch also was consistent to the body and his jab was getting through nearly every time he threw it. I saw the fight with both US and UK commentary - it's interesting how people see things differently. Dirrell held Froch right after he buzzed him with a punch. That's not gonna win a belt from the champ - ever.
bobbypfalcon 2 years ago
yeh but froch didnt do anything to win the fight, he hardly landed anything, dirrell made him look stupid.
boxinslegend 2 years ago
I agree the only thing that Froch did consistently was hit Dirrell on the back of the head and stick in the elbow.
Again Froch was one dimensional and was very lucky,if he fights Kessler it will be Goodnight.
Ry42Back 2 years ago 2
But Kessler has the style to engage Carl in a fight, styles make fights and in a brawl Carl could come out on top.
ngh1 2 years ago
dirrell landed 280 punches and froch landed 39. the stats speak for themselves. i do not know wat people were watchin to say hat froch won....i wanted froch to win but that was the shittest performance iv ever seen from him ever. dirrell deserves that belt
de1onj 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Even Froch's corner told him he needed a knockout before the start of the 12th -- If the 10th round had been a few seconds longer, Froch would have been stopped.
Dirrell did exactly what a BOXER is supposed to do, HIT without being hit back. Froch, the BRAWLER, could never catch up to him and therefore resorted to dirty tactics, This is the SPORT of BOXING, the sweet science, and it is judged on a round-by-round basis. It is not a summary determined at the end of the fight
primeraprim 2 years ago
i think kessler and abrahams will be the last two!
manchesterman118 2 years ago
damn did anybody watch the same fight i did thats boxing and dirrell not only would have won in the us if they fought here but he boxed beautifuly but ward knockin all they ass out lol
city720206 2 years ago
You say being aggressive isn't enough but i would say being just defensive is worse :0
29Gixxer 2 years ago
Again that vid proves my point that Dirrell should not be allowed in the ring until he learns to fight like a pro
29Gixxer 2 years ago
I'm sorry but how can you have respect for a guy who fights like that?
He should not be allowed inside a boxing ring!
This is why Froch was getting frustrated mate.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
Not saying he didn´t clinch, and froch didn´t win a few rounds, but like i said, ref didn´t give him a choice, and clinching isn´t worse then Frochs illegal punches.
I´m not neccessary a fan of dirrel but he won that fight. Dirrel was the better fighter and scored the more points.
basquat76 2 years ago
That was a shambles there mate. This is why us Brits are fuming. How many times did Froch illegally punch compared to Dirrells sharade?
lol you just saw Dirrell clinch like 10 times in 1 round!!!
As I have said you can't blame a guy getting frustrated when his opponent is employing the tactics of a weasel :)
The vid you just saw is the reason why we can't allow that fraud Dirrell to take the WBC.
It's bad for boxing in general...
29Gixxer 2 years ago
that was round 7, 8 and 10. Let´s see 1 to 6. And again, can u blame him being up against carl cheap shot Froch.
basquat76 2 years ago
And i have alot more respect for Dirrel then Froch after that fight. Alot more.
Dirrel the boxer versus Froch the bully.
basquat76 2 years ago
LOL yeah coz in rounds 1 - 6 Dirrell just ran and so didn't need to clinch. Nothing happened in those rounds for that reason :0
Watch the fight again and you will agree with that.
hehe you know that vid pwns Dirrell :)
Froch fights. He doesn't clinch CONSTANTLY as well as other gayweather style tactics.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
And he won those rounds. That´s exactly how you fight someone like froch. He made him look like a freaking amateur, and then out of frustration came the cheap shots. Pure and simple, froch was out boxed. You wanna live the lie and pretend otherwise, just because he clinched his way through a few rounds. They all do that mate
basquat76 2 years ago
When you fight the champ on his home soil, if nothing happens in the rounds then they are a draw or possibly goto the agressor which was Froch.
How you score points for just making someone miss is beyond me.
Had dirrell of landed in those rounds then yes, he should of got them.
You can't say someone won those rounds when they were on the defensive and did nothing mate.
People clinch but not to the extent dirrell did.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
Being agressive isn´t enough. You have to actually catch your opponent and actually HIT HIM. Didn´t happen mate. Face it, your boy lost
basquat76 2 years ago
and it isn´t just a title fight. It´s super six. They´ll meet again, on american soil and froch has 1 chance. KO
basquat76 2 years ago
lol Dirrell is the reason why people are turning away from boxing and watching UFC!
Thankyou for debating though my fiend. You didn't result to insults so I know your European lol
29Gixxer 2 years ago
we do end on a disagrement though, cause i think people are turning off boxing because of fighters like Froch. And if you don´t like defensive boxers, you´re gonna absolutely hate Kessler:-)
basquat76 2 years ago
I acknowledge that buddy. Everyone sees things differently so I respect you opinions. Nah Froch as you say is a brawler and would probably suit the pikey UFC lol.
Lets just hope the remaining fights are really good.
All the best mate.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
lol I just looked hard and it was mostly round 7 that was shown - 11 clinches in total in that round :)
29Gixxer 2 years ago
And still..WBC Super Middle weight Champion of the Worrrld...Carl..the Cooooobra Froch!
29Gixxer 2 years ago
I'm glad this aspect was brought up as this is the difference between how people score fights.
You score the guy who makes the other miss where as i score the agressor if no punches were landed.
This is something which cannot be resolved as it is personal opinion bud.
Nope face it, Dirrell disgraced hmself to defeat and that vid proves it.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
at the end of the day.. you score when u connect which is what dirrell done to froch, froch may have been the aggressor but he hardly landed anything, dirrell landed alot more.. and so what if he was using hit a run tactics, at the end of the day the more eye catchin work was from dirrelland he landed alot more, he was robbed.
boxinslegend 2 years ago
I'm not denying what your saying bud.
What I'm saying is one cannot complain atbthe oucome due to Dirrells holding sharde (amongst othe things).
You just can't expect to bat the champ like that.
Froch would argue that had Dirrell of not consistantly held, turned, jumped on the floor etc then he would of had a better chance of the stppage.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
if ur honest wiv urself m8, dirrell won that fight. dunno how people r making excuses, yeh he held on, n yea he likes to use the ring but he won, comfortably! big up Carl Froch for being a big let down!
de1onj 2 years ago
I'm being honest..I'm saying I cane see a cas that Dirrell won by a round or 2 but what makes us laugh is how peopl like you say "yeh he held on, n yea he likes to use the ring "
Err, holding is illegal and wil eventually result in dissqualification so too will turning your body and inviting the opponent to rabit punch. That's not to mwntion the jumping on the floor lol
The fact that some people find this exciting is kinda sad...
29Gixxer 2 years ago
Hello bud. remember me. We had quite a debate about the froch vs dirrel fight. I´m curious how you saw the froch, kessler fight?
basquat76 1 year ago
@basquat76
lol i remember the name? I tried to score that and found it very hard. I think Froch took the first few rounds with the jab but then Kess started comming back. I personally thought that fight was so tight that it could of gone either way and so I have no complaints. Froch can't complain because he was lucky with the descision against Dirrell and he simply didn't do enough. 117 - 111 is ridiculous though lol.
29Gixxer 1 year ago
@basquat76
PS
Have you heard what Froch has said? He has said that if the next fight is not in UK he will leave the tourny. I do think that's stupid after him going on about how he will fight anybody anywhere although the only thing I disagree with is using that judge who scored the Svenn Ottke vs Robin fight. He was the guy who scored it 117 to Kessler the other night.
29Gixxer 1 year ago
@basquat76
Green will win the S6 mate
29Gixxer 1 year ago
Definitive proof that the Matrix is a fraud....
29Gixxer 2 years ago
boxing is an art and a science.why should dirrel stand and brawl with a man who is bigger and stronger than him?brawling is also part of that science when done correctly as well as a dirty shot here and there (hopkins)but to let froch hit behind the head at will and not take a point away is wrong no matter how you look at it.dirrel landed the harder cleaner shots all night the video doesnt lie.froch was the agressor but his agressivenes was not effective enough to have won this fight.
Honeybrown1 2 years ago
Forgive the double type.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
That's where we differ. Yes Dirrell was at times amazing by the way he avoided Carls power shots but that doesn't physically score points.
Dirrell landed the head shots where as Carl landed the body shots.
I believe Dirrell was 'robbed' coz in the first half of the fight he just ran and then in the latter part he consistantly held, slipped evertime they got close.
He tried to stink his way to the belt so he deserved what he got in my opinion.
I must admit Froch will not have the WBC 4 long.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
The ref should have taken a point from Froch too. Very early on actually, but seeing that he didn´t, and he allowed froch his cheap shots Dirrel didn´t have much of a choice but to duck and cover. He would have been killed by frochs albovs and back of the head punching.
basquat76 2 years ago
Dirrell was CONSTANTLY ducking, turning, holding tho.
Carl only started doing that once Dirrell started his antics.
DIRRELL HAS BEEN BOOED FOR THIS IN THE PAST FOR THIS.
I didn't notice any elbows live but I shall watch again m8.
Think of it...if a guy is getting punched in the back of the head then common sense tells you that's coz he has his back turned/is holding etc.
Fighters seem to be scared of Carl. You could see it in Dirrells face as he entered the ring.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
lol an I wouldn't knock our hooligan spirit.
It's that which helped save Europe from the nazi's :0
29Gixxer 2 years ago
Mate you need to look at the fight again. Cause Froch started very early on with the cheap shots. Dude gets frustrated easy. And i don´t think they´re scared of him. a natural respect for his power, but not afraid. And Dirrel is not a nazi:-)
basquat76 2 years ago
OK I will. It's always better the 2nd time you watch a fight.
Ahh you know why I made that comment. I will quote you... 'That´s not boxing mate. that´s just another british hooligan'
Yes we are a warrior race, that's nothing to be ashamed about.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
Actually funniest thing, Kesslers nickname is the viking warrior, and he´s anything but a warrior. very calculating fighter, but not a warrior
basquat76 2 years ago
I agree. We Brits may not have the skills of others but we have heart and strength. Check that link out mate. Just wanna know what ya think of it.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
what link?
basquat76 2 years ago
The one below
29Gixxer 2 years ago
watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY
29Gixxer 2 years ago
And no, im not a kessler fan. I am Danish but i find Kessler an immensly boring fighter.
basquat76 2 years ago
I see. Shame as Kessler vs Froch will actually be a fight worthy of the WBC I believe.
I predict Kessler to win.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
No it wont. It´s gonna be a boring fight. The one good thing you can say about froch v dirrel. It may not have been pretty, but at least it had some intencity to it.
basquat76 2 years ago
You think so?I can see someone getting KO'd in that fight. As for the Dirrell fight...had Dirrell of fought the way he did in the 11th for the whole fight then yes, it would of been a very good fight and Dirrell would of won so long as the Cobra didn't manage to land a bomb.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
Lets just see the Ward v Kessler fight first. Seriously doubt Kessler gonna take home a point win on american ground after the joke in Nottingham:-)
basquat76 2 years ago
lol revenge huh?
Ward won't press Kessler like Froch will though.
Alot comes down to the fact that USA score differently to Europe.
We don't score points simply coz a fighter is making the other miss.
I'm not knocking it that's just the way it is.
Whatever happens a European is winning the Super Six :0
29Gixxer 2 years ago
I liked Calzage but now people know why he ducked Froch :0
29Gixxer 2 years ago
Actually it is. Making your opponent miss. pretty much the essence of boxing. And maybe you ought to check out Kesslers record list. Looks impressive from a far. But a closer look. not that much. Calzaghe and Mundine and that´s pretty much it. The rest are second rate fighters.
basquat76 2 years ago
People hate on Froch becuase he's a beast and comes to fight. He ducks nobody even if that means he will get KO'd.
29Gixxer 2 years ago
froch is a titleholder not a champ there's a big difference he just got it right now
truBoxingfan 2 years ago
Say what you will. The record says Dirrell isn't undefeated anymore but Froch is. No amount of whining from you is gonna change that.
BTW learn to speak English mate.
corny165 2 years ago
Boxing is exciting because of Mayweather and fighters like him 29Gixxer just mad because he blows Froch and his other fighters up because of Lacy and Jermaine two fucking bums. Any fair minded person know Froch loss and he's a bum that will be defeated again promise.
Boxingmygame 2 years ago
Whats with this 'lose again' business? Froch has never been beaten you fool.
corny165 2 years ago
He loss Sat. they robbed dirrell, Froch suck he's the whackest champ
Boxingmygame 2 years ago
Maybe he is a weak champ. He won't be champ when this tournament is over. However, Dirrell did not give a championship performance. I mean, even if Dirrell had gotten the decision, he'd still look like a weak champ. He just didn't fight like a champ...at all.
bigjer88 2 years ago
He beat the so called champ and hurt him the boy is young and will get better Froch a bum bottom line Allen Green should of had Jermaine spot dude been a bum never beat b-hop, winky, barely spinks
Boxingmygame 2 years ago
Froch is a bum Taylor is better than him just needs to condition better but taylor never beat hopkis or winky...but Direll gave Froch a boxing lesson my man got ripped off
bradleyJay24 2 years ago
Floyd the best but there are new comers like Dirrell, Ward, Antowe Smith, Peterson brothers, Alexander the great, Holt, Bradley, Berto, Williams, Clouds, Dawson, Kirkland and a few more. Froch is a bum and will be defeated again.
Boxingmygame 2 years ago