There was a big war. people died. lots of people. people who didnt deserve to die, and people who did. Instead of worrying about exactly how many people died, who they where, what happened etc cant we just acknoledge the fact that it has happened and make sure that it doesnt happen again? take after the people like Oskar Schindler and Maximillian Kobe and work for the betterment of mankind.
You are right, official statistic - 22 millions, 6,5 of soldiers, 15,5 civilans. Germans lost about 4,2 millions soldiers(Eastfront). 20 millions died soldiers is unreal number.Because Population of USSR was 192 millions.
Atrocities can never be condoned. Collective guilt is not real, it's just something people invent to justify their actions. Understandable is not the same as acceptable.
And dont forget that the germans were not the only ones to commit atrocities. Does that mean that collective guilt applies to other countries as well?
Collective guilt is only used against the ones that lose a war.
The bottom line of what I am trying to enlight people with, is that Germany was treated very bad by the allies and the Soviet Union in particular during WWII. Terror bombing of cities and genocide and ethnic cleansing in the east with several million victims can not be shuffled under the carpet by us, even though we won the war and were in a position to decide what the official history should sound like. It is stupid to do so and allows neonazis a fertile situation.
mmosberg...I agree that the Soviet system was bad, bad, bad. But to say that Germany was treated badly during WW2? This after they laid waste to most of western Russia, Belorussia and the Ukraine. Which war have you been studying?
K. I am sorry for not having made myself clear enough on this page that the Germans treated their occupied territories awfully, particullary in the east. The Germans were the agressors, and we can understand why the Soviets wanted revenge. Germany deserved the treatment they got. Still my point is that the treatment the Germans received shouldn't be omitted out of our European history.
@mmosberg Germany was treated badly after world war one. Which led to national socialism, mobilization and world war 2. What started in 1914 ended when the Berlin wall came down in the 80s.
In all the bickering responses posted, no one has mentioned who the real winners of the war was. No one has touched upon whom had the intentions to benefit the most, and those whom did benefit the most.
Dalbert, don't you call me a nazi. You don't know your history. Stalin killed more soviets than the nazis did, and Soviet troops murdered, raped and plundered sivilians just as much as German troops did. It has just been hidden in the history books. Read some books by Beevor, Sennerteg and Rees and you will also see!!!!
I hope you don't mind my interceding, but Mr Beevor's revisionist book should be taken with a large pinch of salt. Far better are William Craig's 'Enemy At The Gates', and Marshal V.I. Chuikov's 'The Beginning Of The Road'.
K. I know that Beevor created a lot of frustration and denial with his books, but his work is based on research. To my knowledge he harvested nothing but recognition by the established research communities. This ais a big camel to swallow for former Soviet republics, but still a fact. By the way I read Sjukov, and my grandfather met him. Sjukov was also removed from publicity by Stalin....
mmosberg. Just one item. Beevor poo-poos the 'Major Koenig' story - yet Chuikov devotes one and a half pages to it, and lest we forget, Chuikov WAS there at the time - whereas Beevor wasn't.
K. I have as little confidence to Soviets saying no encroachments took place on their side, as with Germans talking about their side. Soviet Union was a brutal dictatorship with no respect for the life of anybody, including it's own citizens, who did oppose. Sjukov/Stalin sacrificed 200.000 men, when they the war was won, just to try to capture Berlin for the 1st of May celebration.
Stalin was arming for attacking Europe, but the campaign was not to start before mid -40s. Hitler knew this and wanted to attack before to late. Abt strength: On both fronts the Germans were outnumbered by 3-5 already in the beginning of WW2. In the end the relation was 10:1. Due to supreme equipment, tactics and excellent organization and skills the Germans were successfull the first years. I am glad the Reich was beaten, but let's not forget that Stalin was more crazy than anyone of this era.
arming too attack Europe???What a fuck are you talking about?He wanted too give the Red Army the leadership it had before the purges,idiot...and you must be a Hitler fan..Stalin never killed anyone who didnt piss him off and he wasnt even Russian..both he and Berija were from Georgia
If the Soviet Union had not received massive western supplies of military equipment like tanks and aircrafts, maybe Germany had succeeded in the east. And if Germany had not attacked soviet Union then the rest of Europe would have been speaking Russian by now. Stalin was planning an attack on Europe to bring communism to Europe. In many ways we can thank those German soldiers who died on the eastern front that we are not living on a communistic continent.
'Stalin was planning an attack on Europe...' In July 1941 Russia wasn't even capable of defending it's own, let alone invading Europe, and remained so until Stalingrad.
A word on the invincibility of German arms. People seem to forget that ALL of the countries invaded by them were unprepared both in material and temperamenatal terms, but once they got their acts together at Stalingrad and El Alamein - no more blitzkreig.
Americans entered the war when Soviet Union was already winning the war and Germans were on the retreat. If it wasn't for the Soviet Union, the rest of the world would be speaking German now.
Before waxing too poetic over the USSR's victory: the Hitler-Stalin-Pact of 1939 (also known as the Nazi-Soviet Nonaggression Treaty) included a secret protocol in which the independent countries of Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania were divided into "spheres of interest". Subsequently all these countries were invaded and ceded to either the Soviet Union or Germany.
Only AFTER Hitler's surprise attack did Stalin declare war.
Yeah right. Do you know that if there wasn't for the Americans the Germans could concentrate ALL of their force on the eastern front and hold the Soviets off long enough to develop much more superior weapons and defeat them? And who defeated the Japansese?
Do you think anyone wants to hear anymore of this bullshit? The bullshit that America was oh so great and that they saved the world. It was'nt JUST the Americans that defeated the Japanese; there were also British, Indian, Canadian, Australian, and New zealand armies there.
Given up?? Have you forgotten Churchills famous speech?? "We shall fight on the beaches, on the streets, in the mountains.. we shall never surrender!" After the battle of britain the RAF continued to pound German infrastructure with thei heavy bombers.
The British were brave??? B.S WW2 was over in Western Europe, so Germany invaded Russia since Britain had basically given up. Then the damn japs bombed Pearl Harbor, and Germany was caught in the middle of fighting on five fronts, Mediterainian, Russia, Western, and Afrika
The stubborn Britons were brave, but it would have been difficult to stand alone against nazi germany on the european continent, despite the Home Fleet and RAF.
And the same would happened to the UK if the US decided not to lease out those 50 destroyers to Britain. So they could defend their convoys in the atlantic ocean against the wolfpacks. The RAF gave the germans a hard match, but without the american assistance with all the necessary materials they shipped. I believe the outcome would have been in German favor.
Without the US and British aid during WW2, the future for the Soviet Union certainly would have looked black. In fact, without their convoys loaded with most needed supplies to Murmansk and via Iran the soviets wouldn't been able to fill their enormous losses in time to repel the german onslaught.
you can understand russia ,after losing so many people and suffering so much,not wanting to give up captured land,another factor of the cold war was when russia stopped all western routes into berlin, all food convoys were stopped,west berlin surrounded ,resulting in the berlin air lift,after agreeing to dividing berlin wanted the west out.
anyway about the video yes russia made a massive sacrifice and had to put up with hitlers and stalins purges and massacres
it was the russian policy of staying in eastern europe and setting up puppet communist governments that started the cold war,poland that britain had gone to war for was occupied by the soviets,all freedom of speech denied,the free goverment in exile in britain ,many returned to poland ,only to be arrested ,it happend all through eastern europe
montgomery wanted to capture berlin,and the western allies could of,because of the german fanatical defence on the eastern front,knowing what the russians would do to them,it would of been possible to have taken berlin,it didnt and through politics the russians were given the honour to take berlin,anyway with the end of war in sight who wanted to lose thousands of men.
the soviets didnt win the war and could not by themselves ,they made a massive contribution yes and sacrifice but without britain and america they would have been beaten,britain was alone against the full might of the axis forces and defeated the german air force in the battle of britain.
hey dickhead i didnt say that you didnt win the war, i said we won it together,theirs a lot of ifs and buts,but no single force during that period could have won it without the other,if you anything about the war at all.
LOL yes.it was the soviets that brought the fascist to there knees.it was the soviets that captured berlin.And Jpowell,i dont want to get in an arguement but the cold war started when america made the truman doctorine.that america will not let one country fall to communism.so the americans started the cold war
The Soviets were the true winners of the European Theatre. They killed the best of Germany's fighting force and scraps of left old men and young boys for the other Allies to eat.
Did Hitler kill at least 10-20 million of his own people? The general estimates of the number of Russians killed by Stalin are between 30-40 million. Nonetheless, Hitler is indirectly responsible for quickening the inevitable extinction of the entire Germanic race.
Great compliation of photos, Nobody. I recognize a few photos from books I have read.
The Germans were the evil bad guys in WWII, but on the Eastern Front, the Russians were even MORE the bad guys....sorry, but they were, otherwise there wouldn't have been a cold war..
Look in the upper left side on your screen, you can see an envelope there. Click on it with your marker and you can read messages from others on you tube. Cheers
25000 russians died fighting alongside the sixth army and 30000 were shot by the reds for cowardice
wayupurs 2 months ago
There was a big war. people died. lots of people. people who didnt deserve to die, and people who did. Instead of worrying about exactly how many people died, who they where, what happened etc cant we just acknoledge the fact that it has happened and make sure that it doesnt happen again? take after the people like Oskar Schindler and Maximillian Kobe and work for the betterment of mankind.
PrincepsLeo 11 months ago
Another great & unfortuante city & its people laid to waste by the damned nazis.
christof139 1 year ago
Бусурмане пишите на русском...
ant7891inbox 2 years ago
30 m,illion russian people died to save europe and uk from nazis but you people had stalin its unimaginable
currawongee 3 years ago 14
30 million? I think 20 million is enough, which is still huge
crazymorph86 3 years ago
20 million was the soldier count, the 30 million is the one that counted the civilian casualties.
LevaArz 3 years ago 10
You are right, official statistic - 22 millions, 6,5 of soldiers, 15,5 civilans. Germans lost about 4,2 millions soldiers(Eastfront). 20 millions died soldiers is unreal number.Because Population of USSR was 192 millions.
foman17 3 years ago 3
10 mln Soldiers ,15 mln people,3-4 mln N\A
MacMexaN 2 years ago
27.8 million is the actual sad death toll.....
MastroMissas 1 year ago
Sorry, im not sure what you mean, is that a typo? 'people had stalin'
vascodagama411 3 years ago 2
It is estimated that 19M Soviet civilians were killed by Stalin, 13M were killed by the Nazis & 12M soviet war deaths in WW2
nosirrom5 2 years ago
not only saved europe and uk...but the rest of the world!
ocelot10 2 years ago 3
i was 14/15 when involved with this music but i just had a sense of the inevitability of russia and its people
i'm 56 now i don't think much has changed
currawongee 3 years ago
What?
June28July 2 years ago
such a setting hey ,such a rememberance.its russian music lets hope it translates such a setting .
currawongee 3 years ago
"Germany deserved the treatment they got"
Atrocities can never be condoned. Collective guilt is not real, it's just something people invent to justify their actions. Understandable is not the same as acceptable.
And dont forget that the germans were not the only ones to commit atrocities. Does that mean that collective guilt applies to other countries as well?
Collective guilt is only used against the ones that lose a war.
Kulregn 3 years ago
Stalin cause Hitler took way to many drugs in the war.
F22Raptorking 3 years ago
hitler vs stalin who would win?
m5a1stuart 3 years ago 2
I think Stalin, because he used to be a dangerous criminal in Georgia.
Paeremannen 3 years ago
Both these men were rather quite short. Stalin was a runt, yet he was the worlds worst ever dictator. I'd have to say Stalin would have won.
thegoosebrain 3 years ago
Slaba Rossia . Viva el Gran ejercito Rojo.Gora Rusia From Basque Country.
Armentia4 4 years ago 5
killing vs killing
eventually we talk about killing
not the beautifull Borodin Theme
legemmr 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bolsheviks were dirty pigs....
janborrowitz 4 years ago
re the music... does someone wanna tell those cellos and violas that it's not a race!!!
dougal429 4 years ago
The bottom line of what I am trying to enlight people with, is that Germany was treated very bad by the allies and the Soviet Union in particular during WWII. Terror bombing of cities and genocide and ethnic cleansing in the east with several million victims can not be shuffled under the carpet by us, even though we won the war and were in a position to decide what the official history should sound like. It is stupid to do so and allows neonazis a fertile situation.
mmosberg 4 years ago
mmosberg...I agree that the Soviet system was bad, bad, bad. But to say that Germany was treated badly during WW2? This after they laid waste to most of western Russia, Belorussia and the Ukraine. Which war have you been studying?
K.
nobody67 4 years ago
K. I am sorry for not having made myself clear enough on this page that the Germans treated their occupied territories awfully, particullary in the east. The Germans were the agressors, and we can understand why the Soviets wanted revenge. Germany deserved the treatment they got. Still my point is that the treatment the Germans received shouldn't be omitted out of our European history.
mmosberg 4 years ago
Forgive me if I'm not all broken hearted about the suffering of the poor WWII Germans. They got off lightly in my book.
december2364 4 years ago 6
@mmosberg Germany was treated badly after world war one. Which led to national socialism, mobilization and world war 2. What started in 1914 ended when the Berlin wall came down in the 80s.
norb1937 1 year ago
In all the bickering responses posted, no one has mentioned who the real winners of the war was. No one has touched upon whom had the intentions to benefit the most, and those whom did benefit the most.
109caio 4 years ago
Dalbert, don't you call me a nazi. You don't know your history. Stalin killed more soviets than the nazis did, and Soviet troops murdered, raped and plundered sivilians just as much as German troops did. It has just been hidden in the history books. Read some books by Beevor, Sennerteg and Rees and you will also see!!!!
mmosberg 4 years ago
I hope you don't mind my interceding, but Mr Beevor's revisionist book should be taken with a large pinch of salt. Far better are William Craig's 'Enemy At The Gates', and Marshal V.I. Chuikov's 'The Beginning Of The Road'.
K.
nobody67 4 years ago
K. I know that Beevor created a lot of frustration and denial with his books, but his work is based on research. To my knowledge he harvested nothing but recognition by the established research communities. This ais a big camel to swallow for former Soviet republics, but still a fact. By the way I read Sjukov, and my grandfather met him. Sjukov was also removed from publicity by Stalin....
mmosberg 4 years ago
mmosberg. Just one item. Beevor poo-poos the 'Major Koenig' story - yet Chuikov devotes one and a half pages to it, and lest we forget, Chuikov WAS there at the time - whereas Beevor wasn't.
K.
nobody67 4 years ago
K. I have as little confidence to Soviets saying no encroachments took place on their side, as with Germans talking about their side. Soviet Union was a brutal dictatorship with no respect for the life of anybody, including it's own citizens, who did oppose. Sjukov/Stalin sacrificed 200.000 men, when they the war was won, just to try to capture Berlin for the 1st of May celebration.
mmosberg 4 years ago
you are right man respect
tzantzia 4 years ago
Stalin was arming for attacking Europe, but the campaign was not to start before mid -40s. Hitler knew this and wanted to attack before to late. Abt strength: On both fronts the Germans were outnumbered by 3-5 already in the beginning of WW2. In the end the relation was 10:1. Due to supreme equipment, tactics and excellent organization and skills the Germans were successfull the first years. I am glad the Reich was beaten, but let's not forget that Stalin was more crazy than anyone of this era.
mmosberg 4 years ago
'Stalin was aiming...in the mid-4o's..'
Where is the evidence?
nobody67 4 years ago
arming too attack Europe???What a fuck are you talking about?He wanted too give the Red Army the leadership it had before the purges,idiot...and you must be a Hitler fan..Stalin never killed anyone who didnt piss him off and he wasnt even Russian..both he and Berija were from Georgia
Dalbert342 4 years ago
If the Soviet Union had not received massive western supplies of military equipment like tanks and aircrafts, maybe Germany had succeeded in the east. And if Germany had not attacked soviet Union then the rest of Europe would have been speaking Russian by now. Stalin was planning an attack on Europe to bring communism to Europe. In many ways we can thank those German soldiers who died on the eastern front that we are not living on a communistic continent.
mmosberg 4 years ago
'Stalin was planning an attack on Europe...' In July 1941 Russia wasn't even capable of defending it's own, let alone invading Europe, and remained so until Stalingrad.
A word on the invincibility of German arms. People seem to forget that ALL of the countries invaded by them were unprepared both in material and temperamenatal terms, but once they got their acts together at Stalingrad and El Alamein - no more blitzkreig.
nobody67 4 years ago
You are a nazi,Berg...you should die like your ideology
Dalbert342 4 years ago
To all those AMERICANS that use the non agression pact against us Russians AMERICA DID NOT ENETR THE WAR UNTIL JAPAN SUPRISE ATTACKED YOU.
VictorNikoliavich 4 years ago
Americans entered the war when Soviet Union was already winning the war and Germans were on the retreat. If it wasn't for the Soviet Union, the rest of the world would be speaking German now.
neether 4 years ago 2
grate recording of Borodins work, who plays?
efraingonzalez 4 years ago
L'Orchestre de la Suisse Romande, Ernest Ansermet.
Rec. 1961. Available on 'The World Of Borodin' CD,
Decca 444 389-2.
nobody67 4 years ago
grate, thank you!
efraingonzalez 4 years ago
Before waxing too poetic over the USSR's victory: the Hitler-Stalin-Pact of 1939 (also known as the Nazi-Soviet Nonaggression Treaty) included a secret protocol in which the independent countries of Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania were divided into "spheres of interest". Subsequently all these countries were invaded and ceded to either the Soviet Union or Germany.
Only AFTER Hitler's surprise attack did Stalin declare war.
WindowOpportunity 4 years ago
I like your video clip and have rated it as awesome. Please check out mine on some pre WW1 battleships.
creamofcardstv 4 years ago
Dont waste second on it... Its onely a shaky camcorder and crappy blury cigarette cards..
Do it all over creamofcardstv...Use a scanner or hold the cam still
Wollemand 4 years ago
Russia really did win the war. They destroyed the bulk of the wehrmacht and Waffen SS
DexterHollandrulez06 5 years ago 2
yes they already won since they captured berlin
hacker0628 5 years ago
ya at a 4 to 1 ratio lol
hilliard55 5 years ago
Yeah right. Do you know that if there wasn't for the Americans the Germans could concentrate ALL of their force on the eastern front and hold the Soviets off long enough to develop much more superior weapons and defeat them? And who defeated the Japansese?
RudolfMaister 4 years ago
peopel from the usa did ok they entered war in 1944 so plzcome on
peruanoxsiempre 4 years ago
Do you think anyone wants to hear anymore of this bullshit? The bullshit that America was oh so great and that they saved the world. It was'nt JUST the Americans that defeated the Japanese; there were also British, Indian, Canadian, Australian, and New zealand armies there.
Solechnaya 4 years ago
Given up?? Have you forgotten Churchills famous speech?? "We shall fight on the beaches, on the streets, in the mountains.. we shall never surrender!" After the battle of britain the RAF continued to pound German infrastructure with thei heavy bombers.
nissan92 5 years ago
The British were brave??? B.S WW2 was over in Western Europe, so Germany invaded Russia since Britain had basically given up. Then the damn japs bombed Pearl Harbor, and Germany was caught in the middle of fighting on five fronts, Mediterainian, Russia, Western, and Afrika
detric9508 5 years ago
The stubborn Britons were brave, but it would have been difficult to stand alone against nazi germany on the european continent, despite the Home Fleet and RAF.
nissan92 5 years ago
And the same would happened to the UK if the US decided not to lease out those 50 destroyers to Britain. So they could defend their convoys in the atlantic ocean against the wolfpacks. The RAF gave the germans a hard match, but without the american assistance with all the necessary materials they shipped. I believe the outcome would have been in German favor.
nissan92 5 years ago
Without the US and British aid during WW2, the future for the Soviet Union certainly would have looked black. In fact, without their convoys loaded with most needed supplies to Murmansk and via Iran the soviets wouldn't been able to fill their enormous losses in time to repel the german onslaught.
nissan92 5 years ago
bigsby48: There are no sciense behind that numbers. In fact there are numbers from 600 000 - 40 000 000? How can it be so different?
yousplitthenight 5 years ago
buen video contiene muchas imagenes realmente buenas.
bloquin 5 years ago
Yes you are absolutely right merseyside.
nissan92 5 years ago
you can understand russia ,after losing so many people and suffering so much,not wanting to give up captured land,another factor of the cold war was when russia stopped all western routes into berlin, all food convoys were stopped,west berlin surrounded ,resulting in the berlin air lift,after agreeing to dividing berlin wanted the west out.
anyway about the video yes russia made a massive sacrifice and had to put up with hitlers and stalins purges and massacres
merseyside 5 years ago
it was the russian policy of staying in eastern europe and setting up puppet communist governments that started the cold war,poland that britain had gone to war for was occupied by the soviets,all freedom of speech denied,the free goverment in exile in britain ,many returned to poland ,only to be arrested ,it happend all through eastern europe
merseyside 5 years ago
montgomery wanted to capture berlin,and the western allies could of,because of the german fanatical defence on the eastern front,knowing what the russians would do to them,it would of been possible to have taken berlin,it didnt and through politics the russians were given the honour to take berlin,anyway with the end of war in sight who wanted to lose thousands of men.
merseyside 5 years ago
the soviets didnt win the war and could not by themselves ,they made a massive contribution yes and sacrifice but without britain and america they would have been beaten,britain was alone against the full might of the axis forces and defeated the german air force in the battle of britain.
merseyside 5 years ago
thats fucking bullshit. we won the war. we battled more then 80% of german force and u fucking dare to say we didnt win? ignorant ..
koozya33 5 years ago 2
hey dickhead i didnt say that you didnt win the war, i said we won it together,theirs a lot of ifs and buts,but no single force during that period could have won it without the other,if you anything about the war at all.
merseyside 5 years ago
LOL yes.it was the soviets that brought the fascist to there knees.it was the soviets that captured berlin.And Jpowell,i dont want to get in an arguement but the cold war started when america made the truman doctorine.that america will not let one country fall to communism.so the americans started the cold war
DrunkSoviet 5 years ago
The Soviets were the true winners of the European Theatre. They killed the best of Germany's fighting force and scraps of left old men and young boys for the other Allies to eat.
BigTMan1 5 years ago
Nicely done. Churchill himself said the Russians had totally gutted the offensive capabilities of the Nazis.
MrWebster 5 years ago
Did Hitler kill at least 10-20 million of his own people? The general estimates of the number of Russians killed by Stalin are between 30-40 million. Nonetheless, Hitler is indirectly responsible for quickening the inevitable extinction of the entire Germanic race.
Great compliation of photos, Nobody. I recognize a few photos from books I have read.
bigsby48 5 years ago
The Germans were the evil bad guys in WWII, but on the Eastern Front, the Russians were even MORE the bad guys....sorry, but they were, otherwise there wouldn't have been a cold war..
jpowell180 5 years ago
Ipowell180. I make no comment either way. However, might I suggest that you actually study the subject, as you so obviously haven't.
K.
nobody67 5 years ago
Excuse me, i mean messages other people has sent to you.
If it´s yellow? then you have got a message.
Thank you for sharing it nobody67.
nissan92 5 years ago
Look in the upper left side on your screen, you can see an envelope there. Click on it with your marker and you can read messages from others on you tube. Cheers
nissan92 5 years ago
A nice set of photos from Stalingrad, thanks.
nissan92 5 years ago
nissan92. Thank you for kind comment.
K.
nobody67 5 years ago