I think the most recent percentage was like 85% of geo-scientists think man-made global warming and climate change is occurring, while only 65% of lay people think it's occurring...shows you how politicized the issue has become. On one hand, you have the big oil barons wanting to maintain profit by lobbying against the idea that GW exists, and on the other you have the Rothschilds, who want to profit from a one-world global system. A one-world system is the next logical step for the human race.
The evidence is continuing to mount in support of man-made global warming and climate change. Do any of you dispute the IPCC or the hundred of thousands of honest scientists who believe in Global Warming's existence? Have any of you taken a geology or geophysics class? You are letting your conspiracy blind you. The Rothschilds are attempting to use Global Warming to create a world system, but that doesn't mean Global Warming is made up... just ask an unbiased permafrost scientist like myself.
C02 doesn't trap anything except a ridiculous notion in the minds of the gullible.
C02 changes as a result of natural (non-human) temperature variations. In other words C02 lags temperature therefore the hypothesis is man caused warming is not only kinda funny... it's also FALSE
Satellite's findings show that planet Earth actually releases heat into space, more than it retains it. The higher efficiency of releasing energy outside of Earth contradicts former forecasts of climate change.
"When my sister and I were growing up," Al Gore told a small audience made up mostly of women, "there was never any doubt in our minds that men and women were equal, if not more so."
At an event in Las Vegas on Monday, 09/1800, Al Gore declared potential breast cancer victims faced "a long waiting line before they could get a biopsy or, uh, or a uh, another kind of, what am I looking for, a sonogram or...." People in the crowd shouted "mammogram."
(Source: MSLSD 09/21/00 - The News with Brian Williams)
@drkstrong the un scientists where cought falsafying data. then the un researched it themselves and found their pupets clear fo the charges of course, the un isa compleet joke bent on domination by bankers.
@1liveandlearn11 Thee is no such thing as a UN scientist - the IPCC members are not paid by the UN, they are not employed by the UN, they are not chosen by the UN, and they change each time. The UN IPCC does no original research - the reports are a summary of existing work.
What data was falsified? Be specific - who falsified it, what was changed, how much difference did it make tot he result, and where is the reference to the analysis done with the untampered data? No blogs, please.
@drkstrong Google Climategate to learn about falsified data for the UN to push their agenda for a global tax, then google how they investigated their own crime, found themselves innocent of course.
@1liveandlearn11 I know all about climategate - Ieven have met and talked with several of the people involved. They ar ehonest hardworking scientists. You do realize that several of these so called "revealing" emails were to some of the world's leading climate sceptics? John Christy for example. Why didnt they blow the cover years ago on this if it was so revealing? They didnt because there is nothing there - its manufactured piece of nonsense.
@drkstrong Whether you believe that mankind has a significant effect on climate or not (I don't believe), forcing everyone on Earth to pay a "carbon tax" (which is a tax on all human activity) to a bunch of scumbag international banksters won't do a friggin thing to solve the alleged problem. All it will do is further impoverish humanity, take away more of our rights and freedoms, and expand the elites' power.
If the Earth does get warmer, we will adapt and thrive, as we have in the past.
@BRYAN351 It is not a matter of belief, it is a matter of fact. The carbon tax or cap & trade are proposed as solutions. If you dont like them then propose a better one. The solution has nothing to do with the state of the climate.
@drkstrong matter of fact? That depends on who you ask, or which studies you choose to believe. A carbon tax or cap & trade are solutions, yes. They're solutions to the elites' incomplete domination of the world.
@BRYAN351 If you ask those who are professional climatologists, ie those who know about the climate, or if you read the studies that have been peer reviewed (ie verified) then you get the same answer. Belief does not come into it. The temperatures record is clear, its increasing particularly in the last 50 years. GHG and aerosols increased by the exact amount need to account for this. no natural source can explain it. Via isotopes and simple math the increase in GHG can be pinned on fossil fuels
@drkstrong You're concerned about 50-year temperature fluctuations on a 4.5 BILLION year old planet? A planet that's seen FAR HIGHER temperature averages in the distant past, when humans weren't even around to make the sky fall?
The elite who own you are happy that you're promoting their agenda.
@BRYAN351 The whole point is that for most of theat 4 By we or anything like us were not around - because of the climate could not support mammals or advanced civilizations. Climate conditions like that which we have now only been in place for about 10,000 years. Previous interglacials were relatively short. If you want to hand the planet back to the reptiles and insects or pengins and polar bears go ahead and say that directly and see how much support you garner.
@drkstrong Among the IPCC elite embarrassingly, if not criminally, compromised is Phillip D. Jones, a Ph.D. climatologist at the University of East Anglia whose work figured prominently in the IPCC Third Assessment Report of 2001. Jones also contributed significantly to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report in 2007 (AR4), but he failed to follow through when skeptical investigators asked to review raw data associated with that report.
@drkstrong Jones sent the following e-mail: "Mike, Can you delete any e-mails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise.... Can you also e-mail Gene and get him to do the same?... Will be getting Caspar to do likewise." The Mike in this message is Michael Mann, professor of meteorology at Pennsylvania State University, whose influential "hockey stick" graph warning of pending global warming eco-catastrophe was found by a congressional investigation to be fraudulent.
@MrClimategate Did anybody delete emails - No. End of story.
Mann's results were upheld by the Congressional enquirey. Only the chairmen (Barton - yes, the one who appologized to BP for the oil spill) claimed despite sworn testemony to the contrary that not to be the case. All the other members of the committee including several from his own party agreed that Mann's results were correct. (See National Accademy testemony to the Committee). A copy of it is available at the NASA site
@drkstrong In another correspondence about AR4 labeled HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL, Jones contacted Mann regarding research critical of their global warming platform. "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report," wrote Jones. "Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
@MrClimategate You realy do need to get you facts straight before sounding off. Did you look at the actual papers concerned & the contraversy surrounding them? No? I thought not. The papers were pushed through a journal by an editor who was anti AGW. They got negative reviews from the reviewers. He would not allow a rebuttal paper which got positive reviews to be published. Both are a breaches of the professional scientific paper process. Most of his fellow editors resigned from the journal.
@drkstrong Mann received another incriminating e-mail from Dr. Kevin Trenberth, a New Zealander now with the University of Colorado and Head of the Climate Analysis Section at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. "The fact is we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."
@MrClimategate Oh for goodness sake - stop parroting Exxon talking points and read the whole email message & not just part of it. If you read the whole email you will see that Trenberth is letting people know about his paper on the flow of energy through the climate system. In the message & the paper he states that the heating is still going (even states the amount) but he says we cant follow it during periods of natural variability where the temperature turns down for a few months. Thats true
@drkstrong Now that AGW is revealed as a farce, will big-spending politicians in the U.S. Senate halt efforts to impose a cap-and-trade system to ostensibly combat greenhouse gases and global warming? Of course not. Cap and trade is about raising taxes and increasing government control over our entire economy.
@MrClimategate Your pemis is faulty. Then you confuse the proposed solutions with the problem. If you dont like the solution propose better ones. That doe snot change the fact that AGW is happening and is an urgent problem.
I think the most recent percentage was like 85% of geo-scientists think man-made global warming and climate change is occurring, while only 65% of lay people think it's occurring...shows you how politicized the issue has become. On one hand, you have the big oil barons wanting to maintain profit by lobbying against the idea that GW exists, and on the other you have the Rothschilds, who want to profit from a one-world global system. A one-world system is the next logical step for the human race.
peteyson5 1 month ago
Comment removed
peteyson5 1 month ago
The evidence is continuing to mount in support of man-made global warming and climate change. Do any of you dispute the IPCC or the hundred of thousands of honest scientists who believe in Global Warming's existence? Have any of you taken a geology or geophysics class? You are letting your conspiracy blind you. The Rothschilds are attempting to use Global Warming to create a world system, but that doesn't mean Global Warming is made up... just ask an unbiased permafrost scientist like myself.
peteyson5 1 month ago
I've been trying to warn people for years about the Rothchilds and the Rockefellers
PoorMansNews 3 months ago
Fuck al gore
asdfghjklkjhgfdsa555 4 months ago 2
@asdfghjklkjhgfdsa555 Nicely said
cambell1308 4 months ago
We chose freedom over tyranni.
Iranianoilbourse 6 months ago
C02 doesn't trap anything except a ridiculous notion in the minds of the gullible.
C02 changes as a result of natural (non-human) temperature variations. In other words C02 lags temperature therefore the hypothesis is man caused warming is not only kinda funny... it's also FALSE
PhilJonesLIED 6 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
RIP 2009 The Hypothesis of Man Made Global Warming
LIberalDrones 6 months ago
Satellite's findings show that planet Earth actually releases heat into space, more than it retains it. The higher efficiency of releasing energy outside of Earth contradicts former forecasts of climate change.
NASA 2011
GreenChurchReject 7 months ago 10
i have a feeling this guy wont live long
vidaminfeeder2 8 months ago
"When my sister and I were growing up," Al Gore told a small audience made up mostly of women, "there was never any doubt in our minds that men and women were equal, if not more so."
(Source: NY Times, 08/12/00)
GreenChurchReject 8 months ago 5
At an event in Las Vegas on Monday, 09/1800, Al Gore declared potential breast cancer victims faced "a long waiting line before they could get a biopsy or, uh, or a uh, another kind of, what am I looking for, a sonogram or...." People in the crowd shouted "mammogram."
(Source: MSLSD 09/21/00 - The News with Brian Williams)
GreenChurchReject 8 months ago
I have posted some links in description if you want to look into this further
cambell1308 10 months ago
Where does it show that AGW is a hoax.
Actually the 31,000 scientists is itself a hoax - see "31000 scientists Cant All be Wrong" at watch?v=C8NVsmgeFmo
drkstrong 10 months ago
@drkstrong the un scientists where cought falsafying data. then the un researched it themselves and found their pupets clear fo the charges of course, the un isa compleet joke bent on domination by bankers.
1liveandlearn11 10 months ago
@1liveandlearn11 Thee is no such thing as a UN scientist - the IPCC members are not paid by the UN, they are not employed by the UN, they are not chosen by the UN, and they change each time. The UN IPCC does no original research - the reports are a summary of existing work.
What data was falsified? Be specific - who falsified it, what was changed, how much difference did it make tot he result, and where is the reference to the analysis done with the untampered data? No blogs, please.
drkstrong 10 months ago
@drkstrong Google Climategate to learn about falsified data for the UN to push their agenda for a global tax, then google how they investigated their own crime, found themselves innocent of course.
1liveandlearn11 10 months ago
@1liveandlearn11 I know all about climategate - Ieven have met and talked with several of the people involved. They ar ehonest hardworking scientists. You do realize that several of these so called "revealing" emails were to some of the world's leading climate sceptics? John Christy for example. Why didnt they blow the cover years ago on this if it was so revealing? They didnt because there is nothing there - its manufactured piece of nonsense.
drkstrong 10 months ago
@drkstrong IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud
MrClimategate 8 months ago
@MrClimategate Sorry you are making that up
drkstrong 8 months ago
@drkstrong why dont you make yourself useful and tell me where the hell is Al Gore these days?
GreenChurchReject 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@GreenChurchReject Why is that important - Gore is not scientist he is merely trying to relay the scientific message.
drkstrong 8 months ago
@drkstrong Whether you believe that mankind has a significant effect on climate or not (I don't believe), forcing everyone on Earth to pay a "carbon tax" (which is a tax on all human activity) to a bunch of scumbag international banksters won't do a friggin thing to solve the alleged problem. All it will do is further impoverish humanity, take away more of our rights and freedoms, and expand the elites' power.
If the Earth does get warmer, we will adapt and thrive, as we have in the past.
BRYAN351 4 months ago
@BRYAN351 It is not a matter of belief, it is a matter of fact. The carbon tax or cap & trade are proposed as solutions. If you dont like them then propose a better one. The solution has nothing to do with the state of the climate.
drkstrong 4 months ago
@drkstrong matter of fact? That depends on who you ask, or which studies you choose to believe. A carbon tax or cap & trade are solutions, yes. They're solutions to the elites' incomplete domination of the world.
BRYAN351 4 months ago
@BRYAN351 If you ask those who are professional climatologists, ie those who know about the climate, or if you read the studies that have been peer reviewed (ie verified) then you get the same answer. Belief does not come into it. The temperatures record is clear, its increasing particularly in the last 50 years. GHG and aerosols increased by the exact amount need to account for this. no natural source can explain it. Via isotopes and simple math the increase in GHG can be pinned on fossil fuels
drkstrong 4 months ago
@drkstrong You're concerned about 50-year temperature fluctuations on a 4.5 BILLION year old planet? A planet that's seen FAR HIGHER temperature averages in the distant past, when humans weren't even around to make the sky fall?
The elite who own you are happy that you're promoting their agenda.
BRYAN351 3 months ago
@BRYAN351 The whole point is that for most of theat 4 By we or anything like us were not around - because of the climate could not support mammals or advanced civilizations. Climate conditions like that which we have now only been in place for about 10,000 years. Previous interglacials were relatively short. If you want to hand the planet back to the reptiles and insects or pengins and polar bears go ahead and say that directly and see how much support you garner.
Nobody "owns me"
drkstrong 3 months ago
@drkstrong Among the IPCC elite embarrassingly, if not criminally, compromised is Phillip D. Jones, a Ph.D. climatologist at the University of East Anglia whose work figured prominently in the IPCC Third Assessment Report of 2001. Jones also contributed significantly to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report in 2007 (AR4), but he failed to follow through when skeptical investigators asked to review raw data associated with that report.
MrClimategate 8 months ago
@MrClimategate You have the Phil Jones story completely upside down. It would be nice if you checked your facts before posting.
drkstrong 8 months ago
@drkstrong go back under the man made warming rock.
GreenChurchReject 8 months ago
@GreenChurchReject Well, there is an open minded answer backe dup by logical rasoning and sound facts.
drkstrong 8 months ago
@drkstrong Jones sent the following e-mail: "Mike, Can you delete any e-mails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise.... Can you also e-mail Gene and get him to do the same?... Will be getting Caspar to do likewise." The Mike in this message is Michael Mann, professor of meteorology at Pennsylvania State University, whose influential "hockey stick" graph warning of pending global warming eco-catastrophe was found by a congressional investigation to be fraudulent.
MrClimategate 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrClimategate Did anybody delete emails - No. End of story.
Mann's results were upheld by the Congressional enquirey. Only the chairmen (Barton - yes, the one who appologized to BP for the oil spill) claimed despite sworn testemony to the contrary that not to be the case. All the other members of the committee including several from his own party agreed that Mann's results were correct. (See National Accademy testemony to the Committee). A copy of it is available at the NASA site
drkstrong 8 months ago
@drkstrong In another correspondence about AR4 labeled HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL, Jones contacted Mann regarding research critical of their global warming platform. "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report," wrote Jones. "Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
MrClimategate 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrClimategate You realy do need to get you facts straight before sounding off. Did you look at the actual papers concerned & the contraversy surrounding them? No? I thought not. The papers were pushed through a journal by an editor who was anti AGW. They got negative reviews from the reviewers. He would not allow a rebuttal paper which got positive reviews to be published. Both are a breaches of the professional scientific paper process. Most of his fellow editors resigned from the journal.
drkstrong 8 months ago
@drkstrong Mann received another incriminating e-mail from Dr. Kevin Trenberth, a New Zealander now with the University of Colorado and Head of the Climate Analysis Section at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. "The fact is we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."
MrClimategate 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrClimategate Oh for goodness sake - stop parroting Exxon talking points and read the whole email message & not just part of it. If you read the whole email you will see that Trenberth is letting people know about his paper on the flow of energy through the climate system. In the message & the paper he states that the heating is still going (even states the amount) but he says we cant follow it during periods of natural variability where the temperature turns down for a few months. Thats true
drkstrong 8 months ago
@drkstrong Now that AGW is revealed as a farce, will big-spending politicians in the U.S. Senate halt efforts to impose a cap-and-trade system to ostensibly combat greenhouse gases and global warming? Of course not. Cap and trade is about raising taxes and increasing government control over our entire economy.
MrClimategate 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrClimategate Your pemis is faulty. Then you confuse the proposed solutions with the problem. If you dont like the solution propose better ones. That doe snot change the fact that AGW is happening and is an urgent problem.
drkstrong 8 months ago