@AngryAdolfHipster you shouldnt be worried about blacks, you need to worry about how you mutants are going to survive this global warning bc you know the sun gives everyone else life but it kills you mutants. also you need to worry about your people dying out from your lack of melanin etc.
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust you have committed adultery with her in your heart.
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Does this concern you? The Bible teaches despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your eye for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
there is no sound but lemme say this i never trusted those quick results one gimme the 2 week joint and ill wait. i dont trust nothing new the govt come out with!
@metriodpower I came into this knowledge in 2004 I felt the same way but I learned there are some things just as bad protect yourself when with random women please. People who are infected with Hepatitis C are known to test positive on that fake test.
Hmmm, the number 2 cause of death among African Americans(most likely an attempt at engineered genocide) and these pasty faced bullshit arstists are trying to "whitewash" it away?
@sopmodm4 You're an idiot. These people are trying to explain to why the tests are crap. The testsare crap and the "meds" are deadly poison. Google...AZT LABEL
that's WHY African Americans are dying of "aids" you idiot. They are being diagnosed based on their "risk group" i.e. race. NOT on an objective evidentiary basis.
@sopmodm4 If that was the case people in your hood would be dying left in right do people really know what an epidemic is? I see a drug epidemic in the hood but not Aids. It's an attempt to stop reproduction for Black folks ie safe sex or abstinence,it's also about medication and treatment Dr. appointments etc it's a scam.I'm glad this is finally coming to the surface,I really appreciate this video.
Google....Verdict Of $2.5 Million Over False-Positive HIV Diagnosis
Brings up Basic Problems With AIDS Testing and Treatment, Say Scientists
"Rodney Richards, Ph.D., worked on the development of antibody (ELISA) and genetic “viral load” tests for Amgen and holds some related patents. “The diagnosis of being HIV positive is based on arbitrary combinations of tests, none of which are approved for diagnosing HIV,” he says. “In fact there is no test for HIV. It’s just an illusion.”
Google....The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia
".... let's just take a look at who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?
A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney, Nathan Geffen, Gregg Gonsalves, Richard Jefferys), and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman)...."
@mykoolaidtastesfunny But the "AIDS truth mafia" is attacked for lack of same credentials. How about that Griffin quote? Was it 20 years out of date? Or not? I haven`t been able to find anything more recent than that, so I`ll just assume that`s the case. 20 years.... You probably weren`t even born back then. Makes you think, huh?
@comingviking No honey...the Dr griffin quote is ot ou of date.....the burden of proof is ALWAYS on hose who make a claim not on those who disute it.
If you are a member of Gallo's virusof mass destruction cult then you have the burden of proof. TITLE DATE and JOURNAL where Gallo proved these proteins.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 ...belong to a unique viral entity and he linked it to immune problems.
@comingviking Dosn't it strike you as "odd" that NOBODY can come up with the primary peer reviewed papers which pove that these proteins.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 .....belong to Gallo's virus and linked it to immune problems?
Ha...not to mention the fact that cult members claim the reason there is still no vaccine is because Gallo's virus mutates sooo rapidly...how does Gallo's virus both mutate and remain identical at the same time? Is it a magic virus?
@comingviking I grew up with Gallo's fake ass virus in the family. I was alive and I personally remember when Gallo announced his big "discovery" at that press conference in 1984
@comingviking Btw...the Ministry of Aidstruth is NOT attked for lack of credentials although it's true they don't have any. It's the libel, logical fallacies and censorship campaigns that piss people off.
“It will surely lead to a scientifically healthier society if the burden of proof for HIV as a deadly pathogen is returned to where it belongs — to those who maintain that HIV causes AIDS — and others are allowed to pursue alternative approaches in the battle for eradication of the disease.”
Dr. Beverly E. Griffin, PhD, Director, Department of Virology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School google...IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW”SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
@mykoolaidtastesfunny And when did Dr Griffin say that? I know she said some things LIKE it around 1991. Do you suggest that this is a stand that Dr Griffin would be willing to take these days? Has she said something to that effect recently?
@mykoolaidtastesfunny But perhaps you could come up with a date for when Dr Griffin allegedly made the statement you claim to have quoted? IS it 20 years old?
@comingviking What does it matter? The rules of logic have not changed. The burden of proofis ALWAYS on those make a cliam and not on those who dispute it.
“We did not purify [isolate] ... We saw some particles but they did not have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses ... They were very different ... What we did not have, as I have always recognized it, is that it was truly the cause of AIDS.”
Interview with Djamel Tahi-1997
— Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, co-discoverer of HIV, Pasteur Institute, Paris
@mykoolaidtastesfunny So, they had some real challenges back then in isolating the virus. It was grounbreaking work, and it was 30 years ago. Not easy at all. And because of that, it doesn`t exist? You cherrypick a couple of phrases, and that makes HIV go away?
Google....Questioning HIV/AIDS: Morally Reprehensible or
Scientifically Warranted? Nov 2007 JPANDS
.." As to point 2, dissidents continue to ask—so far to no avail—for the SPECIFIC literature citations of publications that supposedly prove that HIV causes AIDS..... Respecting point 4, these activists are spending an inordinate amount of time seeking to discredit skeptics."
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You know, even though this journal has "physicians and doctors" in the title, it isn`t really a scientific journal. And it isn`t really peer reviewed. It`s a microphone stand for cranks.
@comingviking Again sweetie....ad hominem attack is NOT the TITLE DATE and JOURNAL of the reference you nee to provide. If YOUbelieve in Gallo's fake ass virus then you have the burden of proof.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Well, it`s really not so much what I believe, as what has been repeatedly shown in a VERY high number of peer reviewed articles over the last 30 years or so, and for which a couple of Nobel prizes have been given. I should think that when a unified research community consistently claim the virus to exist and demonstrate the decease vectors, the burden of proof should be on the denier. But all you got is "Hollywood gumshoe" and JPANDS.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny "So say we all", is certainly not proof of anything. Except if you refer a ton of research that has been reviewed and published in scientific journals. And the opposition (thats you) cite an organization of doctors who hate peer verview because it stops them from publishing the crap they just KNOW to be true, but can`t prove, and an ex marine, ex cop, now AIDS denier, and a host of people whose best argument is "I DON`T BELIEVE IT".
"From the CDC (Center for Disease Control) in Atlanta I have requested the scientific papers that prove the causal relationship between the HIV retrovirus and the IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME commonly known as AIDS. They have never sent even references to the peer-reviewed primary scientific literature that establishes the causal relationship because they can’t. Such papers do NOT exist."
quote is from....Lynn Margulis, PhD, Biologist...Recipient of the National Medal of Science (1999). Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983. ..The Library of Congress started to permanently archive all of her papers in 1998.
for more google....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You know, one really can`t be bothered. Wouldn`t change your mind even if I got you a reference list as long as my arm. A man that refers to the sublime thruth radiating from Hollywood blogspot, while denying the relevance of a Lancet article as recent as last year, have made up his mind, and won`t be swayed by any amount of fact. But it`s good, clean fun to watch you embarras yourself. Keep it up.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Brilliant. "I claim to have sent someone a letter, to which I received no reply. Therefore, HIV do not exist." No prize for spotting the gaping hole in the argument, people. You`re FUNNY!
Google....More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”
@mykoolaidtastesfunny WTF? Hollywood blogspot? Give me a break!! I bet studying humanity on the streets of Calcutta made Baker an expert on many things. Mainly how to pick up prostitutes, I assume. Wouldn`t take his word in a public health debate, however. That`s all you have? Pitiful, pitiful.
@comingviking Honey....he's a privte investigator hired by th Semmelweiss Society. He is lincensed to give evidence based opinions in courts of law. The FACT is that "hiv" criminal cases are being thrown out because there is zero evidence that thos tests detect any specific infection.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny And what gives the Semmelweis society legitimacy in this issue? It`s an organization devoted to help physicians that think themselves wrongfully accused of misconduct, not a research organization. And Baker is an ex Marine, which I find kinda irrelevant to the issue at hand. He is, to put it shortly, not competent to give testemony regardig the existence og nonexistence of the HIV virus, or the decease vectors of AIDS. He`s a grunt, not a researcher. Cant you tell the diff?
@comingviking Looking for ways to attack people is not the TITLE DATE and JOURNAL whee these proteins.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 .....were proven to belong toa unique viral entity and linked it to immune problems.
Google...Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers
"... Montagnier, however, admitted on camera more than a decade ago that his experiments did NOT purify any virus. a letter from an electron microscopy expert indicating that Gallo’s samples did NOT contain any virus, and a letter from Gallo to a researcher verifying that HIV could NOT be purified directly from human materials..."
cont..."... In 1993, governmental investigators determined Gallo had so poorly recorded his key and much-cited experiment that it was impossible to repeat and verify it.
The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the lead paper of the four was "fraught with false and erroneous statements".....
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Whatever was said or not back then, is 30 year old water under the bridge, and not particularly relevant to the present knowledge and research. You kinda sound like creationists that lay into Darwins mistakes and errors, and forget that thats a century and a halv ago, and that we`ve had some seven generations of researchers expand on it since then. God, you guys are pathetic.
@comingviking No honey because the "hiv" proteins have NOT changed. They are exctly the same as when Gallo first ptented his test.
Google....20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc. the major proteins considered to be "HIV proteins" remain as follows: p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 (1, 2).
direct links to the references are included in the article.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny It`s good and fine that he got himself a Nobel prize in biochemistry. His invention was in the field of molecular biology, and a very important and useful lab technique. But that doesn`t make him an expert in the field of virology or public health issues. But hey, viral loads? Didn`t you just say that the virus doesn`t exist? Change of heart?
@comingviking Google.....PCR FOR THE SO-CALLED MEASUREMENT OF HIV VIRAL LOAD
"BUT: 6% or more of the human genome has striking homology with retroviral genome, a fact that is well documented for more than a decade. So, PCR has no difficulty to recognize short retroviral-like sequences in these human chromatin samples (never twice the same, but never mind: it keeps mutating !!), .."
@comingviking Just name the primary peer reviewed reference where Gallo the "discoverer" AND test kit patent holder proved these proteins... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160.....belong to a uniqueviral entity and linked it to immune problems.
You need to provide TITLE DATE and JOURNAL and it better have Gallo's name on it. Gallo is the test kit patent holder and avirus of mass destruction was his bright idea.
"The questions, “WHO proved that HIV attacks cells and causes AIDS? HOW? WHERE was this published?”, are routinely evaded by defenders of the orthodoxy; but they could not evade them in court. How could even the most expert witness respond? — “the most rigorous peer review . . . comes from cross-examination . . . in the courtroom” Could Fauci or Gallo be reduced to pleading the Fifth, not answering for fear of self-incrimination?"
@mykoolaidtastesfunny How about EVERYWHERE? And why the hell do you harp on about the discoverers of the virus when there is a such an enormous field of research on the issue? I did a PubMed search on anti viral drugs and HIV and it returned 26,000 + peer reviewed articles. I then included survival rates in the keyword search, and got 201 articles on survival rates and antiviral drugs in HIV infection. HIV infection alone returns in excess of 120,000 peer reviewed articles, each research based.
@comingviking Lmao...stop oing to infomercial mareting sites like Aidstruth. You guys all say the exact same things.There are no scientists on the board and they're sponsored by the companies whose products they endorse
WHY do you thnk "hiv" exists when even the "discoverer" never actually found any such thing? Do you tink he made a very very very very vry lucky guess?
@mykoolaidtastesfunny I don`t even know what "aidstruth" IS. Never been there. But I do have basic medical training, and access to literature databases. HIV is VERY thouroghly descrived, and like I said, a good 120,000 peer reviewed research articles have been published on the issue. Your koolaid must taste VERY funny. Maybe yous hould consider cutting back.
HIV treatment response and prognosis in Europe and North America in the first decade of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis.
INTERPRETATION: Virological response after starting HAART improved over calendar years, but such improvement has......NOT....... translated into a decrease in mortality.
The HIV-1 pandemic is a complex mix of diverse epidemics within and between countries and regions of the world, and is undoubtedly the defining public-health crisis of our time. Research has deepened our understanding of how the virus replicates, manipulates, and hides in an infected person. (....) Antiretroviral treatment has transformed AIDS from an inevitably fatal condition to a chronic, manageable disease
Heterosexual transmission remains the dominant mode of transmission and accounts for about 85% of all HIV-1 infections.
Although the relative contribution of cell-free virus compared with cell-associated virus in HIV-1 transmission remains unclear, there is growing evidence that viral load is predictive of transmission risk.
Based on their genetic make-up, HIV-1 viruses are divided into three groups.
""Nevertheless, the absence of seroincident infection over the course of the study cannot be entirely attributed to significant behavior change. No transmission occured among the 25 percent of couples who did not use condoms consistently at their last follow-up nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up" (Padian, pg 356.)
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Why do you refer to outdated research? That`s 13 years out of date, a study that started a mere 6 years after the initial discovery of the HIV virus. 13 years is an eternity in a field so extencively researched as this has been.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Yeah, he just lied, and then some other guys just lied, for 30 years, and they published 120,000 articles that were just lies, and then some asshole gave them the Nobel prize, and nobody died from AIDS, ever. That about cover your position on this? LMAO!
@comingviking Gallo never got a Nobel Prize. You can't give a Nobel Prize for papers which have been found to be fraudulent more than once by more than one gvernmental agency. Montagnier i just the guy Gallo stole from and he's been trying to back out of this mess for years.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny But, hey, like, you said this article supported ypur view that HIV doesn`t exist? Where the hell do they get the fucking genetic makeup of a virus that doesn`t exist, from? A damn mystery. Way deep!
Name the primary peer reviewed referecewhich proves these proteins.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 ....used in ALL "hiv" tests belong to a unique viral entity and linke it to immune problems
Don't try t weasel out of it by going back to an old comment.
@comingviking Um....no. I'm pointng out that imaginary things can't hurt people. WHY do you think "hiv" exists when even Gallo never found any such thing and the only evidence you have for its existance are Gallo's tests.
Aids Hiv Lol Mankind is just nasty and corrupt all manner of disease surrounds him it weren't not longer ago 50 plus ago He was dying like flies from living flithy lifestyle God told him how to wash and be clean but nasty mankind still does not want to hear and do if you do not hear you shall feel ........
Look to Africa. They do not have the benefit of medication, and die by the thousands. Look especially to present day South Africa, which sports a government of AIDS deniers, where the minister of health care thinks herbal meds are a good strategy for AIDS. The AIDS casualties are through the roof and off the scale.
@comingviking There have been no increases in death rates or decreass in population anywhere
google....NOTEWORTHY SUCCESES AGAINST AIDS IN AFRICA
" In Uganda, the overall death rate has been about 1.3%, according to the CIA Fact Book. Since HIV-infected Ugandans have been dying at the rate of 1.2%, just about all the deaths during this period of decreasing prevalence of HIV were attributable to HIV......"
Cont- "If it weren’t for that frightful epidemic, then, Ugandans would hardly have been dying at all, apparently they could live virtually for ever...."
This is good too....HIV DOUBLETHINK
"What is the greatest tribulation for a continent ravaged by a deadly incurable virus spread sexually and from mother to child, where in many parts of that continent the infection rate is as high as 30%...
@mykoolaidtastesfunny The CIA fact book? How about the WHO fact books? How about every major medical association active on the continent? You cite ONE puny source and that`s proof? And the rest of the world is, I assume, just part of a gigantic conspiracy?
@comingviking Sweetie....the burden of proof of proof isone those who make a claim not on those who dispute it. If YOU believe in Gallo's fake virus then YOU have the burden of proof. You need to cme up wuth the TITLE Date and JOURNAL where Gallo the "disocverer" AND test kit patent holder proved there is such a virus and linked it to immune problems
@mykoolaidtastesfunny The HIV virus, its infection vectors and its way of damaging the immune system is very well documented in a large number of peer reviewed articles in a large number of journals. The AIDS deniers are the ones that have the burden of proof in this case. They have to come up with an alternative explanation for why all these people with HIV infections, have failing immune systems. I will not do to simply say: I don`t believe in this. Sweetie.
@comingviking Um....so the Primary peer reviewed papershould be trouble sunshine. You have the burden of proof. It isn't up to the dissidents to find them fr you
@comingviking WHAT virus? The "discoverer" AND test kit patent holder, Robert "L Ron" Gallo never found any such virus. He just lied. That's why his "hiv" antibody tests are NONspecific and UNstandardized trash. He had nothing to compare the tests to t validate them scientifically.
Go look at the disclaimer. It's on my channel under the pic of the Pope.
@comingviking Google....There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit
"No, really. But take it from someone you trust, Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: “[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.”
“A 25-year health campaign was misplaced outside the continent of Africa,” the article concedes, daring you hang them all....."
@comingviking See on youtube....Nobel Laureate Montagnier: HIV Can Be Cleared Naturally - House of Numbers
Montagnier won the Nobel Prize for "hiv". He's been getting excellent results in his aids patients usig fermented papaya juice. he slams the drug and vaccines as being about prfit not health
@mykoolaidtastesfunny That`s almost magic! One whole fucking minute! He said nothing about the fruit juice, btw. That weakened individuals contract damn near anything much easier than people with good health, is very basic medical knowledge. That giving people healthy food, clean water, etc, will also help protect them against infection, is also very true. And basic.
But that someone can be cured from aids by means of fermented papaya, is just bullshit. It ain`t THAT healthy!
@mykoolaidtastesfunny. If fermented papaya has any effect, or even better effect than antiviral drugs, wonderful. I would be very happy if that was indeed the case. So you, by any chance, have a link to an actual peer reviewed jounal article where this claim is made and backed up by any actual data?
@Isreal4realz What does HIV do? Fucks up your immune system, is what. When do you think it pertinent to TEST that? Most of the time: When your immune system seems to be acting up. Not working properly. Like when you`re ill and just don`t seem to get better? Lingering pneumonia, weird fungal infections, that sort of thing? So then you get your test, and your diagnosis, and your meds, but it`s a bit late in the game, and you`re already loosing. Because now you hav AIDS, not just HIV.
Whats up with people saying HIV is harmless? How about the proven scientific fact that it ravages your immune system, leading you to be extremely vulnerable to a wide variety of diseases. Just because it is RELATED to retro-viruses, it is not only a retro virus, doesn't mean it acts just like a retro-virus. And as for it being a government plot? Are you people fucking insane? Our government is too damn stupid to pull off something like that.
@Sjazz87 WHAT proof? Even the "discoverer" never actually found any such virus in any aids patient. That's WHY the "hiv' tests are UNstandardized and NONspecific crap. I have the direct link to a disclaimer on my channel. It's right under the Pope.
I'm going to have to go on what Abbott Diagnostics says about their own product. If you have any info they missed go share it with them
@Sjazz87 And no..."hiv" is retrovirus...IF the "discoverer" had ever found one I mean...so there is no reason to think it would behave any differently than any other catalogues retrovirus. It isn't a magic virus.
@Sjazz87 - well, if they made Gallo's original research that all hiv testing and all hiv drugs have been based upon, classified documents for reasons of national security, then they would have 25 years until the freedom of information act required their release and declassification - that would also prevent that evidence from being admitted into the courts - ps. donald rumsfeld was the chairman of top selling hiv drug company gilead sciences
@Sjazz87 Well, it IS a retrovirus, in the sense that it splices itself into your DNA and just kinda becomes a part of you. But that`s a caraceristic shared with a whole bunch of viruses. You know, it`s like with mammals: You have your four legged animals, and some of them are cows, pretty little kittens and some are freaky sheep dogs. And then you have your rabid wolverines, which are seriously bad news when you`re out hiking. Hiv is in the latter category.
Don't miss this enormously IMPORTANT article in the JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS!
jpands . org
See 'SPRING 2010' / Vol.15 No. 1: "HIV TESTS ARE NOT HIV TESTS!" by Henry H. Bauer Ph.D.
jpands . org/vol15no1/bauer . pdf (NO gaps) Shared by HIVQuestions: bit . ly / bwhwXd
Let's ALL pray that this, together with the current screening of HOUSE OF NUMBERS documentary: houseofnumbers . com is the LAST & FINAL STRAW in this mega HOAX & web of evil LIE$
Don't miss this enormously IMPORTANT article in the JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS!
jpands . org
See 'SPRING 2010' / Vol.15 No. 1: "HIV TESTS ARE NOT HIV TESTS!" by Henry H. Bauer Ph.D.
jpands . org/vol15no1/bauer . pdf (NO gaps) Shared by HIVQuestions: bit . ly / bwhwXd
Let's ALL pray that this, together with the current screening of HOUSE OF NUMBERS documentary: houseofnumbers . com is the LAST & FINAL STRAW in this mega HOAX & web of evil LIE$
Don't bother arguing with koolybabe... she can't debate and she'll simply spout off a series of copy and pastes. She preys on the weak and ignorant who don't understand the science. If you want an interesting response, next time she copy+pastes something about Gallo's falsified data... ask her to point out a single piece of data in his report. The fact is, we can barely read his comments and simply says what she's told. She'll probably misconstrue a line about previous research (not even data)!
I'm going to sum this up. MY black people if anyone racist says you have aids as a racist comment. Just tell them they have cancer and they'll freak out works every time
Because when they do that they don't find anything. There has never been "hiv' viremia in aids patients. That's why the tests are unstandardized....without something to compare them to it's all just guesswork.
1) HIV particles have never been demonstrated by electron microscopy in the blood stream of AIDS patients allegedly presenting with high viral load.
4) Public credulity is abused by the constant publication of HIV images that all derive from electron microscopy of laboratory cell cultures, and never derive directly from AIDS patients.
December 8, 2003, address to European Parliament Conference on AIDS in Africa, Brussels
quotes is by....Etienne de Harven,..Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.
Rethinkaids com quotes. The direct link is on my channel or google....IS HIV REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS?ARE THERE REALLY ONLY "A FEW"SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
@MandolinoFan What is detected, is antibodys AGAINST the virus. HIV by proxy, if you will. And "harmless"? People DO die from it, you know. The fact that it`s a retrovirus, simply means that it incorporates itself into your DNA, and THAT means that once you get it, you don`t get rid of it. Now where`s the harm in having a virus that simply stays, you might ask. If it`s a virus that can damage your T-cells, it`s VERY bad. Retro does not meand "hippy" og "groovy" where viruses are concerned....
mykoolaidtastesfunny: OK, I did the Google thing. Is this where you get your facts? Quoting a mathematician with expertise in number theory? Darin Brown is not a biologist or physician and does not understand the fuzziness of such systems. All of these issues can be answered but not in a 500 character limit response on YT
Are you claiming that Rodriguez got his paper wrong?
"Despite this trend across broad categories of HIV RNA levels, only a small proportion of CD4 cell loss variability (4%-6%) could be explained by presenting plasma HIV RNA level." Rodríguez B et al., 2006. "Predictive Value of Plasma HIV RNA Level on Rate of CD4 T-Cell Decline in Untreated HIV Infection", JAMA.2006; 296: 1498-1506,
"Hiv" is a hoax. There isn't even a scientifically valid test to detect it. Immune deficiencies are multifactorial and environmental. That's why it never spread out of the original risk groups of 25 years ago.
AIDS is a behavioural disease. It is multifactorial, brought on by several simultaneous strains on the immune system — drugs, pharmaceutical and recreational, sexually transmitted diseases, multiple viral infections.
Dr. Gordon Stewart, MD, Emeritus Professor of Public Health, University of Glasgow. Former Consultant Physician (Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine) to National Health Service (UK) and WHO. Author of over 100 journal articles and contributions to symposia
quote is from...Rethinkaids com quotes on aids section. The direct link is on my channel or people can google....IS HIV REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS?ARE THERE REALLY ONLY "A FEW"SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
What EVIDENCE do you have that any of those deaths were caused by a virus of mass destruction? Is there a scientifically valid test for it? No. Does the epidemiology support claims of a sexually transmitted pathogen? No. Has there been an increase in ANY country's death rates or decrease in population? NO!
I'm getting a little tired of people using logical fallacies instead of evidence.
In Uganda, the overall death rate has been about 1.3% according to the CIA Fact Book. Since HIV+ Ugandans have been dying at the rate of 1.2%, just about all the deaths during this period of decreasing prevalence of HIV were attributable to HIV. If it werent for that frightful epidemic, then, Ugandans would hardly have been dying at all, apparently they could live virtually for ever. So too in Kenya, with its overall death rate of 1.1% of which at least 1% was supposedly attributable to HIV
excerpt is from "Noteworthy Successes Against Aids in Africa"
Also see....HIV DOUBLETHINK « HIV/AIDS Skepticism
....What is the greatest tribulation for a continent ravaged by a deadly incurable virus spread sexually and from mother to child, where in many parts of that continent the infection rate is as high as 30%, occasionally even higher?
We did not purify [isolate] ... We saw some particles but they did not have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses ... They were very different ... What we did not have, as I have always recognized it, is that it was truly the cause of AIDS.
Interview with Djamel Tahi-1997
Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, co-discoverer of HIV, Pasteur Institute, Paris
"From the CDC (Center for Disease Control) in Atlanta I have requested the scientific papers that prove the causal relationship between the HIV retrovirus and the IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME commonly known as AIDS. They have never sent even references to the peer-reviewed primary scientific literature that establishes the causal relationship because they cant. Such papers do NOT exist."
quote is by...— Lynn Margulis, PhD, Biologist, Distinguished Professor of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Recipient of the National Medal of Science (1999). Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983. Author of over 130 scientific works and the books, The Library of Congress started to permanently archive all of her papers in 1998.
Lmao...why not bother to offer me Gallo? Is it because even you know that Gallo is a liar and a fraud?
The LEVY paper is NOT the primary citation. Either you don't know what a primary citation is or you think I don't. And I guess Lynn Margulis must not either, lol
I'm very aware of the history of AIDS. The articles by Montagnier et al in 1984 were concerning a viral pathogenesis of lymphadenopathy. I used the article below because it specifically named AIDS.
@AngryAdolfHipster you shouldnt be worried about blacks, you need to worry about how you mutants are going to survive this global warning bc you know the sun gives everyone else life but it kills you mutants. also you need to worry about your people dying out from your lack of melanin etc.
shallah777 1 month ago
THIS VIDEO IS A JOKE...ALL BLACK PEOPLE PUT EVERYONE AT RISK OF HIV/AIDS AND SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE U.S. AND EUTHANIZED.
AngryAdolfHipster 1 month ago
@AngryAdolfHipster PROVE IT
TheNewBreedKniV3z 1 month ago
@AngryAdolfHipster PROVE ITS A JOKE OR SHUT THE FUCK UP
TheNewBreedKniV3z 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you ready?
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust you have committed adultery with her in your heart.
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Does this concern you? The Bible teaches despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your eye for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
standingontruth1 1 month ago in playlist POPULATION CONTROL./ ETC.
there is no sound but lemme say this i never trusted those quick results one gimme the 2 week joint and ill wait. i dont trust nothing new the govt come out with!
MLPeebles27 7 months ago
I CANT HEAR THE VIDEO
SapphireDiamond19 1 year ago
Comment removed
Coenzyme911 1 year ago
Respond to this video... Well time to bang some bitches left and right, it's hammer time ^_^
metriodpower 1 year ago
@metriodpower I came into this knowledge in 2004 I felt the same way but I learned there are some things just as bad protect yourself when with random women please. People who are infected with Hepatitis C are known to test positive on that fake test.
mookeychase0907 1 month ago
Hmmm, the number 2 cause of death among African Americans(most likely an attempt at engineered genocide) and these pasty faced bullshit arstists are trying to "whitewash" it away?
sopmodm4 1 year ago
@sopmodm4 You're an idiot. These people are trying to explain to why the tests are crap. The testsare crap and the "meds" are deadly poison. Google...AZT LABEL
that's WHY African Americans are dying of "aids" you idiot. They are being diagnosed based on their "risk group" i.e. race. NOT on an objective evidentiary basis.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@sopmodm4 If that was the case people in your hood would be dying left in right do people really know what an epidemic is? I see a drug epidemic in the hood but not Aids. It's an attempt to stop reproduction for Black folks ie safe sex or abstinence,it's also about medication and treatment Dr. appointments etc it's a scam.I'm glad this is finally coming to the surface,I really appreciate this video.
mookeychase0907 1 month ago
Google....Verdict Of $2.5 Million Over False-Positive HIV Diagnosis
Brings up Basic Problems With AIDS Testing and Treatment, Say Scientists
"Rodney Richards, Ph.D., worked on the development of antibody (ELISA) and genetic “viral load” tests for Amgen and holds some related patents. “The diagnosis of being HIV positive is based on arbitrary combinations of tests, none of which are approved for diagnosing HIV,” he says. “In fact there is no test for HIV. It’s just an illusion.”
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
Google....The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia
".... let's just take a look at who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?
A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney, Nathan Geffen, Gregg Gonsalves, Richard Jefferys), and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman)...."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny And now the world awaits a quick description of your own scentific credentials.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking ?
I've never claimed to have any. That's one of the reasons I post quotes from experts wit identites and credentials that are easily verified.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny But the "AIDS truth mafia" is attacked for lack of same credentials. How about that Griffin quote? Was it 20 years out of date? Or not? I haven`t been able to find anything more recent than that, so I`ll just assume that`s the case. 20 years.... You probably weren`t even born back then. Makes you think, huh?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking No honey...the Dr griffin quote is ot ou of date.....the burden of proof is ALWAYS on hose who make a claim not on those who disute it.
If you are a member of Gallo's virusof mass destruction cult then you have the burden of proof. TITLE DATE and JOURNAL where Gallo proved these proteins.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 ...belong to a unique viral entity and he linked it to immune problems.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny 20 goddamn years out of date. Says it all, really. Go fuck a duck.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking No sweetie...the burden of proof is ALWAYS on those who make a claim not on tose who dispute it.
Look itup if you don't believe me.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking Dosn't it strike you as "odd" that NOBODY can come up with the primary peer reviewed papers which pove that these proteins.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 .....belong to Gallo's virus and linked it to immune problems?
Ha...not to mention the fact that cult members claim the reason there is still no vaccine is because Gallo's virus mutates sooo rapidly...how does Gallo's virus both mutate and remain identical at the same time? Is it a magic virus?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago 2
@comingviking I grew up with Gallo's fake ass virus in the family. I was alive and I personally remember when Gallo announced his big "discovery" at that press conference in 1984
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking Btw...the Ministry of Aidstruth is NOT attked for lack of credentials although it's true they don't have any. It's the libel, logical fallacies and censorship campaigns that piss people off.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny And now the world awaits a quick description of your own scientific credentials.
comingviking 1 year ago
“It will surely lead to a scientifically healthier society if the burden of proof for HIV as a deadly pathogen is returned to where it belongs — to those who maintain that HIV causes AIDS — and others are allowed to pursue alternative approaches in the battle for eradication of the disease.”
Dr. Beverly E. Griffin, PhD, Director, Department of Virology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School google...IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW”SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny And when did Dr Griffin say that? I know she said some things LIKE it around 1991. Do you suggest that this is a stand that Dr Griffin would be willing to take these days? Has she said something to that effect recently?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking I don't see why she wouldn't. Nobody can cough up the primary peer reviewedpapers which prove Gallo's virus exists and causs aids.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny But perhaps you could come up with a date for when Dr Griffin allegedly made the statement you claim to have quoted? IS it 20 years old?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking What does it matter? The rules of logic have not changed. The burden of proofis ALWAYS on those make a cliam and not on those who dispute it.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
“We did not purify [isolate] ... We saw some particles but they did not have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses ... They were very different ... What we did not have, as I have always recognized it, is that it was truly the cause of AIDS.”
Interview with Djamel Tahi-1997
— Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, co-discoverer of HIV, Pasteur Institute, Paris
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny So, they had some real challenges back then in isolating the virus. It was grounbreaking work, and it was 30 years ago. Not easy at all. And because of that, it doesn`t exist? You cherrypick a couple of phrases, and that makes HIV go away?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking They did NOT find anything. These are the "hiv proteins".... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160
Nam the papers where i was proven those proteins belong to Gallo's virus and he inked it to immune problems.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
Google....Questioning HIV/AIDS: Morally Reprehensible or
Scientifically Warranted? Nov 2007 JPANDS
.." As to point 2, dissidents continue to ask—so far to no avail—for the SPECIFIC literature citations of publications that supposedly prove that HIV causes AIDS..... Respecting point 4, these activists are spending an inordinate amount of time seeking to discredit skeptics."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You know, even though this journal has "physicians and doctors" in the title, it isn`t really a scientific journal. And it isn`t really peer reviewed. It`s a microphone stand for cranks.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Again sweetie....ad hominem attack is NOT the TITLE DATE and JOURNAL of the reference you nee to provide. If YOUbelieve in Gallo's fake ass virus then you have the burden of proof.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Well, it`s really not so much what I believe, as what has been repeatedly shown in a VERY high number of peer reviewed articles over the last 30 years or so, and for which a couple of Nobel prizes have been given. I should think that when a unified research community consistently claim the virus to exist and demonstrate the decease vectors, the burden of proof should be on the denier. But all you got is "Hollywood gumshoe" and JPANDS.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Honey.....you need to NAME the primary papers. TITLE DATE and JOURNAL
Stop evadin the question with logical fallacies.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking Just NAME the papers.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking No...you don't get to re-write the rules of logic to accomodate your cult. Ad populum is not evidence either.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny "So say we all", is certainly not proof of anything. Except if you refer a ton of research that has been reviewed and published in scientific journals. And the opposition (thats you) cite an organization of doctors who hate peer verview because it stops them from publishing the crap they just KNOW to be true, but can`t prove, and an ex marine, ex cop, now AIDS denier, and a host of people whose best argument is "I DON`T BELIEVE IT".
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Um.....honey...YOU have the burden of proof and Gallo announcedhis virus at a press conference.
The burden on proof is on those who make a claim not on those who dispute it. Did you "forget" again?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking Also...Clark Baker can provehis claims. Prosecutors ARE gettin their cases thrown out.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
"From the CDC (Center for Disease Control) in Atlanta I have requested the scientific papers that prove the causal relationship between the HIV retrovirus and the IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME commonly known as AIDS. They have never sent even references to the peer-reviewed primary scientific literature that establishes the causal relationship because they can’t. Such papers do NOT exist."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
quote is from....Lynn Margulis, PhD, Biologist...Recipient of the National Medal of Science (1999). Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983. ..The Library of Congress started to permanently archive all of her papers in 1998.
for more google....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Actually, no scientists in the field itself, and only a minority outside of it. And you, of course.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking So NAME the prmary peer reviewed papers.
TITLE DATE and JOURNAL
stop evadng te question with logical fallacies.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You know, one really can`t be bothered. Wouldn`t change your mind even if I got you a reference list as long as my arm. A man that refers to the sublime thruth radiating from Hollywood blogspot, while denying the relevance of a Lancet article as recent as last year, have made up his mind, and won`t be swayed by any amount of fact. But it`s good, clean fun to watch you embarras yourself. Keep it up.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Lol....reallly? All of a sudden you can't be bothered?
Wow....the primaryreference should be no trouble at all. You just makeexcuses and personal attacks though
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Brilliant. "I claim to have sent someone a letter, to which I received no reply. Therefore, HIV do not exist." No prize for spotting the gaping hole in the argument, people. You`re FUNNY!
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking So NAME them.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
Google....More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny WTF? Hollywood blogspot? Give me a break!! I bet studying humanity on the streets of Calcutta made Baker an expert on many things. Mainly how to pick up prostitutes, I assume. Wouldn`t take his word in a public health debate, however. That`s all you have? Pitiful, pitiful.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Honey....he's a privte investigator hired by th Semmelweiss Society. He is lincensed to give evidence based opinions in courts of law. The FACT is that "hiv" criminal cases are being thrown out because there is zero evidence that thos tests detect any specific infection.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny And what gives the Semmelweis society legitimacy in this issue? It`s an organization devoted to help physicians that think themselves wrongfully accused of misconduct, not a research organization. And Baker is an ex Marine, which I find kinda irrelevant to the issue at hand. He is, to put it shortly, not competent to give testemony regardig the existence og nonexistence of the HIV virus, or the decease vectors of AIDS. He`s a grunt, not a researcher. Cant you tell the diff?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Looking for ways to attack people is not the TITLE DATE and JOURNAL whee these proteins.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 .....were proven to belong toa unique viral entity and linked it to immune problems.
Stick to ad res argument.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking Stop evading....personal attacks are not the TITLE DATE and JOURNAL of the primary peer reviewed reference.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
Google...Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers
"... Montagnier, however, admitted on camera more than a decade ago that his experiments did NOT purify any virus. a letter from an electron microscopy expert indicating that Gallo’s samples did NOT contain any virus, and a letter from Gallo to a researcher verifying that HIV could NOT be purified directly from human materials..."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
cont..."... In 1993, governmental investigators determined Gallo had so poorly recorded his key and much-cited experiment that it was impossible to repeat and verify it.
The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the lead paper of the four was "fraught with false and erroneous statements".....
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Whatever was said or not back then, is 30 year old water under the bridge, and not particularly relevant to the present knowledge and research. You kinda sound like creationists that lay into Darwins mistakes and errors, and forget that thats a century and a halv ago, and that we`ve had some seven generations of researchers expand on it since then. God, you guys are pathetic.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking No honey because the "hiv" proteins have NOT changed. They are exctly the same as when Gallo first ptented his test.
Google....20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc. the major proteins considered to be "HIV proteins" remain as follows: p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 (1, 2).
direct links to the references are included in the article.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
“Years from now, people will find our acceptance of the HIV theory of AIDS as silly as we find those who excommunicated Galileo.”
Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist, Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for inventing PCR the basis for the HIV viral load tests
for more google....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
He's also in HOUSE OF NUMBERS along with Montagnier etc
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny It`s good and fine that he got himself a Nobel prize in biochemistry. His invention was in the field of molecular biology, and a very important and useful lab technique. But that doesn`t make him an expert in the field of virology or public health issues. But hey, viral loads? Didn`t you just say that the virus doesn`t exist? Change of heart?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Google.....PCR FOR THE SO-CALLED MEASUREMENT OF HIV VIRAL LOAD
"BUT: 6% or more of the human genome has striking homology with retroviral genome, a fact that is well documented for more than a decade. So, PCR has no difficulty to recognize short retroviral-like sequences in these human chromatin samples (never twice the same, but never mind: it keeps mutating !!), .."
He also has article out in the Spet 2010 JPANDS
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking Just name the primary peer reviewed reference where Gallo the "discoverer" AND test kit patent holder proved these proteins... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160.....belong to a uniqueviral entity and linked it to immune problems.
You need to provide TITLE DATE and JOURNAL and it better have Gallo's name on it. Gallo is the test kit patent holder and avirus of mass destruction was his bright idea.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Yeah, kinda like the germ theory, innit? Should have stuck with the miasmas, shouldn`t we? Now, THAT was a well founded theory.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking ?
Wtf are you talking about? That isn't a scientific peer reiewed reference.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
Google ... Defeating HIV = AIDS
"The questions, “WHO proved that HIV attacks cells and causes AIDS? HOW? WHERE was this published?”, are routinely evaded by defenders of the orthodoxy; but they could not evade them in court. How could even the most expert witness respond? — “the most rigorous peer review . . . comes from cross-examination . . . in the courtroom” Could Fauci or Gallo be reduced to pleading the Fifth, not answering for fear of self-incrimination?"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny How about EVERYWHERE? And why the hell do you harp on about the discoverers of the virus when there is a such an enormous field of research on the issue? I did a PubMed search on anti viral drugs and HIV and it returned 26,000 + peer reviewed articles. I then included survival rates in the keyword search, and got 201 articles on survival rates and antiviral drugs in HIV infection. HIV infection alone returns in excess of 120,000 peer reviewed articles, each research based.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Lmao...stop oing to infomercial mareting sites like Aidstruth. You guys all say the exact same things.There are no scientists on the board and they're sponsored by the companies whose products they endorse
WHY do you thnk "hiv" exists when even the "discoverer" never actually found any such thing? Do you tink he made a very very very very vry lucky guess?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny I don`t even know what "aidstruth" IS. Never been there. But I do have basic medical training, and access to literature databases. HIV is VERY thouroghly descrived, and like I said, a good 120,000 peer reviewed research articles have been published on the issue. Your koolaid must taste VERY funny. Maybe yous hould consider cutting back.
comingviking 1 year ago
Comment removed
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking COUNTING studies is not a reference.
Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):451-8.
HIV treatment response and prognosis in Europe and North America in the first decade of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis.
INTERPRETATION: Virological response after starting HAART improved over calendar years, but such improvement has......NOT....... translated into a decrease in mortality.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You mean THIS LAncet article? Qouting from summary:
The HIV-1 pandemic is a complex mix of diverse epidemics within and between countries and regions of the world, and is undoubtedly the defining public-health crisis of our time. Research has deepened our understanding of how the virus replicates, manipulates, and hides in an infected person. (....) Antiretroviral treatment has transformed AIDS from an inevitably fatal condition to a chronic, manageable disease
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking You need o providTitle Date and Journal so I can check it.
Also that is not the Prmary reference.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny More Lancet quotes, since you love this article so much:
Heterosexual transmission remains the dominant mode of transmission and accounts for about 85% of all HIV-1 infections.
Although the relative contribution of cell-free virus compared with cell-associated virus in HIV-1 transmission remains unclear, there is growing evidence that viral load is predictive of transmission risk.
Based on their genetic make-up, HIV-1 viruses are divided into three groups.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking No honey...you need to provide TITLE DATE ad JOURNAL. Like this..
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug 15;146(4):350-7.
Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in northern California: results from a ten-year study.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
""Nevertheless, the absence of seroincident infection over the course of the study cannot be entirely attributed to significant behavior change. No transmission occured among the 25 percent of couples who did not use condoms consistently at their last follow-up nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up" (Padian, pg 356.)
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny YOU need to unplug your head from your asshole. Maybe THAT`S why the cooaid tastes like shit.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Name callingi also not a scientific peer reviewed reference.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Why do you refer to outdated research? That`s 13 years out of date, a study that started a mere 6 years after the initial discovery of the HIV virus. 13 years is an eternity in a field so extencively researched as this has been.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking "Hiv" WASN'T discovered you ninny. That's thepoint. The"disocverer" never found any such thing. He just lied.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Yeah, he just lied, and then some other guys just lied, for 30 years, and they published 120,000 articles that were just lies, and then some asshole gave them the Nobel prize, and nobody died from AIDS, ever. That about cover your position on this? LMAO!
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking "Lmao" is NOT the primary peer reviewed papers which support yourfaith in Galo's virus.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking Gallo never got a Nobel Prize. You can't give a Nobel Prize for papers which have been found to be fraudulent more than once by more than one gvernmental agency. Montagnier i just the guy Gallo stole from and he's been trying to back out of this mess for years.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny But, hey, like, you said this article supported ypur view that HIV doesn`t exist? Where the hell do they get the fucking genetic makeup of a virus that doesn`t exist, from? A damn mystery. Way deep!
Or maybe you didn`t actually READ it?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking I Can't read a article you didn't give a reference for.
Are you claiming Gallo musta made a lucky guess?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You mean the Lancet one? That`s the very one that YOU referred to. Didn`t you recognise it?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking No I didn't.
Name the primary peer reviewed referecewhich proves these proteins.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 ....used in ALL "hiv" tests belong to a unique viral entity and linke it to immune problems
Don't try t weasel out of it by going back to an old comment.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking ALL the research is based on the results of GALLO's tests. He went from the press conference straight to the patent office.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny So your harebrained assumption is that all those 120.000 articles are basically about nothing?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Um....no. I'm pointng out that imaginary things can't hurt people. WHY do you think "hiv" exists when even Gallo never found any such thing and the only evidence you have for its existance are Gallo's tests.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
damn some real shit rite here!
NoLaTvShow 1 year ago
Aids Hiv Lol Mankind is just nasty and corrupt all manner of disease surrounds him it weren't not longer ago 50 plus ago He was dying like flies from living flithy lifestyle God told him how to wash and be clean but nasty mankind still does not want to hear and do if you do not hear you shall feel ........
greensprig 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Robert Gallo ought to be sent to the GALLOWS for giving stillbirth to HIV & thus, all the genocide that his criminal & blatant LIE$ have resulted in.
See: FearOfTheInvisible . com for a copy of his falsified & fraudulent submission 1984 ~ yes! 26 longest years ago.
Just as millions are only now asking "What Building 7?" ~ thanks God, millions are finally asking "Where is HIV & what AID$?"
South Africa ~The elusive & ILLusive HIV & so-called AID$ Killing Fields of note!
annie46664 1 year ago
isn't is strange that there are NO symptoms of this supposed deadly virus?
isn't it also strange that it only AFTER when the patient takes the prescribed medication when the patients starts getting seriously sick?
Isreal4realz 1 year ago 6
@Isreal4realz
Look to Africa. They do not have the benefit of medication, and die by the thousands. Look especially to present day South Africa, which sports a government of AIDS deniers, where the minister of health care thinks herbal meds are a good strategy for AIDS. The AIDS casualties are through the roof and off the scale.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking There have been no increases in death rates or decreass in population anywhere
google....NOTEWORTHY SUCCESES AGAINST AIDS IN AFRICA
" In Uganda, the overall death rate has been about 1.3%, according to the CIA Fact Book. Since HIV-infected Ugandans have been dying at the rate of 1.2%, just about all the deaths during this period of decreasing prevalence of HIV were attributable to HIV......"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
Cont- "If it weren’t for that frightful epidemic, then, Ugandans would hardly have been dying at all, apparently they could live virtually for ever...."
This is good too....HIV DOUBLETHINK
"What is the greatest tribulation for a continent ravaged by a deadly incurable virus spread sexually and from mother to child, where in many parts of that continent the infection rate is as high as 30%...
High birth rates, of course:
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny The CIA fact book? How about the WHO fact books? How about every major medical association active on the continent? You cite ONE puny source and that`s proof? And the rest of the world is, I assume, just part of a gigantic conspiracy?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Sweetie....the burden of proof of proof isone those who make a claim not on those who dispute it. If YOU believe in Gallo's fake virus then YOU have the burden of proof. You need to cme up wuth the TITLE Date and JOURNAL where Gallo the "disocverer" AND test kit patent holder proved there is such a virus and linked it to immune problems
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny The HIV virus, its infection vectors and its way of damaging the immune system is very well documented in a large number of peer reviewed articles in a large number of journals. The AIDS deniers are the ones that have the burden of proof in this case. They have to come up with an alternative explanation for why all these people with HIV infections, have failing immune systems. I will not do to simply say: I don`t believe in this. Sweetie.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking Um....so the Primary peer reviewed papershould be trouble sunshine. You have the burden of proof. It isn't up to the dissidents to find them fr you
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking The WHO cancelled the hetero aids epidemic 2 years ago btw.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Really? Did they tell the virus?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking WHAT virus? The "discoverer" AND test kit patent holder, Robert "L Ron" Gallo never found any such virus. He just lied. That's why his "hiv" antibody tests are NONspecific and UNstandardized trash. He had nothing to compare the tests to t validate them scientifically.
Go look at the disclaimer. It's on my channel under the pic of the Pope.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking Google....There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit
"No, really. But take it from someone you trust, Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: “[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.”
“A 25-year health campaign was misplaced outside the continent of Africa,” the article concedes, daring you hang them all....."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@comingviking See on youtube....Nobel Laureate Montagnier: HIV Can Be Cleared Naturally - House of Numbers
Montagnier won the Nobel Prize for "hiv". He's been getting excellent results in his aids patients usig fermented papaya juice. he slams the drug and vaccines as being about prfit not health
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny That`s almost magic! One whole fucking minute! He said nothing about the fruit juice, btw. That weakened individuals contract damn near anything much easier than people with good health, is very basic medical knowledge. That giving people healthy food, clean water, etc, will also help protect them against infection, is also very true. And basic.
But that someone can be cured from aids by means of fermented papaya, is just bullshit. It ain`t THAT healthy!
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking It's called research. If youread his papers yo'll see where the fermented papaya juice comes in.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny. If fermented papaya has any effect, or even better effect than antiviral drugs, wonderful. I would be very happy if that was indeed the case. So you, by any chance, have a link to an actual peer reviewed jounal article where this claim is made and backed up by any actual data?
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking There is ZERO evidence thatarv' make pople live longer healthirlives than NO drugs atall.
Google.....Montagnier oxidative stress
to find his papers.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@Isreal4realz What does HIV do? Fucks up your immune system, is what. When do you think it pertinent to TEST that? Most of the time: When your immune system seems to be acting up. Not working properly. Like when you`re ill and just don`t seem to get better? Lingering pneumonia, weird fungal infections, that sort of thing? So then you get your test, and your diagnosis, and your meds, but it`s a bit late in the game, and you`re already loosing. Because now you hav AIDS, not just HIV.
comingviking 1 year ago
Whats up with people saying HIV is harmless? How about the proven scientific fact that it ravages your immune system, leading you to be extremely vulnerable to a wide variety of diseases. Just because it is RELATED to retro-viruses, it is not only a retro virus, doesn't mean it acts just like a retro-virus. And as for it being a government plot? Are you people fucking insane? Our government is too damn stupid to pull off something like that.
Sjazz87 1 year ago
@Sjazz87 WHAT proof? Even the "discoverer" never actually found any such virus in any aids patient. That's WHY the "hiv' tests are UNstandardized and NONspecific crap. I have the direct link to a disclaimer on my channel. It's right under the Pope.
I'm going to have to go on what Abbott Diagnostics says about their own product. If you have any info they missed go share it with them
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@Sjazz87 To see Gallo's fabulous "proof" that "hiv" exists and causes aids google...A Selection of HIV DocumentsEvidence of Fraud?
Unearthed by US Governmental Investigations into the scientific work of Dr. Robert Gallo
Make note of the NIH's letter to Gallo....WHAT virus Gallo? All you have is crap here
To see Gallo trying to weasel out of showing any EM's of his great "discovery" google....DECONSTRUCTING THE MYTH OF AIDS
Gallo's weaselling is about 24-28 minutes in
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@Sjazz87 And no..."hiv" is retrovirus...IF the "discoverer" had ever found one I mean...so there is no reason to think it would behave any differently than any other catalogues retrovirus. It isn't a magic virus.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@Sjazz87 - well, if they made Gallo's original research that all hiv testing and all hiv drugs have been based upon, classified documents for reasons of national security, then they would have 25 years until the freedom of information act required their release and declassification - that would also prevent that evidence from being admitted into the courts - ps. donald rumsfeld was the chairman of top selling hiv drug company gilead sciences
hivquestions 1 year ago 3
@Sjazz87 Well, it IS a retrovirus, in the sense that it splices itself into your DNA and just kinda becomes a part of you. But that`s a caraceristic shared with a whole bunch of viruses. You know, it`s like with mammals: You have your four legged animals, and some of them are cows, pretty little kittens and some are freaky sheep dogs. And then you have your rabid wolverines, which are seriously bad news when you`re out hiking. Hiv is in the latter category.
comingviking 1 year ago
hahaha
where did aids come from?
certainly not from nature as the virus consist of componants which is unnatural?
so was it harvest in lab?
example swineflu- consisted of 2 part human flu-1 part bird-1 part pig? one must ask how is that possible? gene slicing
KingKong1ooo 1 year ago
@KingKong1ooo Dude, are you freaking retarded?
Sjazz87 1 year ago
Comment removed
DaTruth2024 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't miss this enormously IMPORTANT article in the JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS!
jpands . org
See 'SPRING 2010' / Vol.15 No. 1: "HIV TESTS ARE NOT HIV TESTS!" by Henry H. Bauer Ph.D.
jpands . org/vol15no1/bauer . pdf (NO gaps) Shared by HIVQuestions: bit . ly / bwhwXd
Let's ALL pray that this, together with the current screening of HOUSE OF NUMBERS documentary: houseofnumbers . com is the LAST & FINAL STRAW in this mega HOAX & web of evil LIE$
~South Africa~
annie46664 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't miss this enormously IMPORTANT article in the JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS!
jpands . org
See 'SPRING 2010' / Vol.15 No. 1: "HIV TESTS ARE NOT HIV TESTS!" by Henry H. Bauer Ph.D.
jpands . org/vol15no1/bauer . pdf (NO gaps) Shared by HIVQuestions: bit . ly / bwhwXd
Let's ALL pray that this, together with the current screening of HOUSE OF NUMBERS documentary: houseofnumbers . com is the LAST & FINAL STRAW in this mega HOAX & web of evil LIE$
~South Africa~
annie46664 1 year ago
Don't bother arguing with koolybabe... she can't debate and she'll simply spout off a series of copy and pastes. She preys on the weak and ignorant who don't understand the science. If you want an interesting response, next time she copy+pastes something about Gallo's falsified data... ask her to point out a single piece of data in his report. The fact is, we can barely read his comments and simply says what she's told. She'll probably misconstrue a line about previous research (not even data)!
toothpaste100 1 year ago
I'm going to sum this up. MY black people if anyone racist says you have aids as a racist comment. Just tell them they have cancer and they'll freak out works every time
afrosamurai45 1 year ago
This info is a bit plausible... 9:02 since when is Africa a country???
sheebaby 2 years ago
Peace and Love!
CanadianBeaver 2 years ago
Why do they not use a big microscope to look at your blood and determine if the viruses are there?
eydos 2 years ago 2
Because when they do that they don't find anything. There has never been "hiv' viremia in aids patients. That's why the tests are unstandardized....without something to compare them to it's all just guesswork.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
1) HIV particles have never been demonstrated by electron microscopy in the blood stream of AIDS patients allegedly presenting with high viral load.
4) Public credulity is abused by the constant publication of HIV images that all derive from electron microscopy of laboratory cell cultures, and never derive directly from AIDS patients.
December 8, 2003, address to European Parliament Conference on AIDS in Africa, Brussels
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago 2
quotes is by....Etienne de Harven,..Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.
Rethinkaids com quotes. The direct link is on my channel or google....IS HIV REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS?ARE THERE REALLY ONLY "A FEW"SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
and find it too
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago 2
Microscopes work for bacteria mainly. Now, the tests say in their prospects that THEY DO NOT DETECT HIV.
Plus, HIV is a harmless retrovirus
MandolinoFan 2 years ago 5
@MandolinoFan HIV is not particularly harmless, HIV gives you AIDS.
comingviking 1 year ago
@comingviking according to my tell-lie-vision your right.....its says it on tv all the time...HIV gives you AIDS so it must be true....lmao
getdamoney08 1 year ago
@MandolinoFan What is detected, is antibodys AGAINST the virus. HIV by proxy, if you will. And "harmless"? People DO die from it, you know. The fact that it`s a retrovirus, simply means that it incorporates itself into your DNA, and THAT means that once you get it, you don`t get rid of it. Now where`s the harm in having a virus that simply stays, you might ask. If it`s a virus that can damage your T-cells, it`s VERY bad. Retro does not meand "hippy" og "groovy" where viruses are concerned....
comingviking 1 year ago
People can check for themselves...
Google...20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc.
6. Why do "viral load", CD4 counts, and culturable virus have almost no correlation with each other (13, 14)?
8. Why does "viral load" account for only 4% of the change in CD4 count cell loss in HIV-positive asymptomatics (15)?
11. Why are very high "viral loads" found in HIV-negative individuals? (19-21)
direct links to the studies are included in the article.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
mykoolaidtastesfunny: OK, I did the Google thing. Is this where you get your facts? Quoting a mathematician with expertise in number theory? Darin Brown is not a biologist or physician and does not understand the fuzziness of such systems. All of these issues can be answered but not in a 500 character limit response on YT
wjwmorrow 2 years ago
I'm wasn't quoting Darrin Brown. I was quoting the paper we were just discussing. The paper which proves your claim wrong.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
Are you claiming that Rodriguez got his paper wrong?
"Despite this trend across broad categories of HIV RNA levels, only a small proportion of CD4 cell loss variability (4%-6%) could be explained by presenting plasma HIV RNA level." Rodríguez B et al., 2006. "Predictive Value of Plasma HIV RNA Level on Rate of CD4 T-Cell Decline in Untreated HIV Infection", JAMA.2006; 296: 1498-1506,
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
Btw...shooting messengers does not answer the 20 Unanswerable Questions.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
Why do you lie so much? HAVE you staked your career on this theory?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
mykoolaidtastesfunny: Let me ask you this: what is your overall thesis on HIV/AIDS?
wjwmorrow 2 years ago
"Hiv" is a hoax. There isn't even a scientifically valid test to detect it. Immune deficiencies are multifactorial and environmental. That's why it never spread out of the original risk groups of 25 years ago.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
June 2008
Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: "[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa."
google...
There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
AIDS is a behavioural disease. It is multifactorial, brought on by several simultaneous strains on the immune system — drugs, pharmaceutical and recreational, sexually transmitted diseases, multiple viral infections.
Dr. Gordon Stewart, MD, Emeritus Professor of Public Health, University of Glasgow. Former Consultant Physician (Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine) to National Health Service (UK) and WHO. Author of over 100 journal articles and contributions to symposia
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
quote is from...Rethinkaids com quotes on aids section. The direct link is on my channel or people can google....IS HIV REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS?ARE THERE REALLY ONLY "A FEW"SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
and find it too
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
So 25 million deaths world wide is a hoax...?
wjwmorrow 2 years ago
What EVIDENCE do you have that any of those deaths were caused by a virus of mass destruction? Is there a scientifically valid test for it? No. Does the epidemiology support claims of a sexually transmitted pathogen? No. Has there been an increase in ANY country's death rates or decrease in population? NO!
I'm getting a little tired of people using logical fallacies instead of evidence.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
Yet you quote a few mavericks who use distorted data and ignore the vast body of scientific evidence. You can't have it both ways...
wjwmorrow 2 years ago
Lmao....shooting messengers is not EVIDENCE. What is your EVIDENCE?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
In Uganda, the overall death rate has been about 1.3% according to the CIA Fact Book. Since HIV+ Ugandans have been dying at the rate of 1.2%, just about all the deaths during this period of decreasing prevalence of HIV were attributable to HIV. If it werent for that frightful epidemic, then, Ugandans would hardly have been dying at all, apparently they could live virtually for ever. So too in Kenya, with its overall death rate of 1.1% of which at least 1% was supposedly attributable to HIV
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
excerpt is from "Noteworthy Successes Against Aids in Africa"
Also see....HIV DOUBLETHINK « HIV/AIDS Skepticism
....What is the greatest tribulation for a continent ravaged by a deadly incurable virus spread sexually and from mother to child, where in many parts of that continent the infection rate is as high as 30%, occasionally even higher?
High birth rates, of course:......
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
My evidence is the 200,000+ peer reviewed articles listed on PubMed
wjwmorrow 2 years ago
Lmao...no...that's an appeal to authority. What is the primary citation proving the causal relationship between hiv and immune problems?
You do understand what a primary citation is right?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
How about this:
Isolation of lymphadenopathy-associated virus (LAV) and detection of LAV antibodies from US patients with AIDS.
Barré-Sinoussi F, Mathur-Wagh U, Rey F, Brun-Vezinet F, Yancovitz SR, Rouzioux C, Montagnier L, Mildvan D, Chermann JC. JAMA. 1985 Mar 22-29;253(12):1737-9.
wjwmorrow 2 years ago
That's not the primary citation :)
The virus of mass destruction was announced in 1984
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
We did not purify [isolate] ... We saw some particles but they did not have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses ... They were very different ... What we did not have, as I have always recognized it, is that it was truly the cause of AIDS.
Interview with Djamel Tahi-1997
Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, co-discoverer of HIV, Pasteur Institute, Paris
Rethinkaids com quotes on aids section
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
What's your point about this (the virus particles)?
wjwmorrow 2 years ago
It's pretty damn clear. They found "something" just not anything typical of a retrovirus.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
Where is your primary citation?
;)
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
"From the CDC (Center for Disease Control) in Atlanta I have requested the scientific papers that prove the causal relationship between the HIV retrovirus and the IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME commonly known as AIDS. They have never sent even references to the peer-reviewed primary scientific literature that establishes the causal relationship because they cant. Such papers do NOT exist."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
quote is by...— Lynn Margulis, PhD, Biologist, Distinguished Professor of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Recipient of the National Medal of Science (1999). Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983. Author of over 130 scientific works and the books, The Library of Congress started to permanently archive all of her papers in 1998.
Rethinkaids com quotes on aids section.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
If you don't accept either the Montagnier or Gallo articles how about an entirely independent one:
Isolation of lymphocytopathic retroviruses from San Francisco patients with AIDS.
Levy JA, Hoffman AD, Kramer SM, Landis JA, Shimabukuro JM, Oshiro LS.Science. 1984;225(4664):840-2.
And while we are at it, he EM pictures published in this paper are unequivocally of a retrovirus.
wjwmorrow 2 years ago
Lmao....THAT is NOT the primary citation proving the link btw hiv and aids. You're just pulling up random papers now.
WHAT does that have to do "hiv"?
NOTHING!
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
The Levy paper is HIV. If you don't accept this or the Montagnier articles (I won't bother to offer you Gallo) you really are in denial...
wjwmorrow 2 years ago
Lmao...why not bother to offer me Gallo? Is it because even you know that Gallo is a liar and a fraud?
The LEVY paper is NOT the primary citation. Either you don't know what a primary citation is or you think I don't. And I guess Lynn Margulis must not either, lol
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
Answer this question...you keep avoiding it....do you make your living off of the virus of mass destruction? Is that how you buy your toys?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
I'm very aware of the history of AIDS. The articles by Montagnier et al in 1984 were concerning a viral pathogenesis of lymphadenopathy. I used the article below because it specifically named AIDS.
wjwmorrow 2 years ago