@CaptainOmar I swear man! Hondas beginning to tick me off with their continuous CR"V's, Civics, Accords, Blah blahhh, Give us SPORTSS CARS! -________-
@CaptainOmar I think you fail to realize the S2000 is a far more tunable car and much more affordable - with boost it easily spanks exotic cars while still offering razor sharp handling....made for more than 10 years its been available to you for many years - few people bothered to tune it - but as time passed and people tweak it more mand more folks are starting to realize Honda gave us a supra --- 700whp stock block F20Cs --- 10/9 sec stock block S2000s....much much cheaper than a Supra
@96bweb if what you drive is better than this than your doing something. this car is no piece of shit. these are high end cars capable of many things. just because its a Honda doesn't mean its a piece. and also fyi, any Honda will out last any Chevy.
God I love this car ... Got to take some sweet pics and got to sit in it ... It comes up to my waist and I'm only 6'3" if you want pics text me 2544664697
acura and honda is the same thing, acura is just hondas "luxury" line. same main company though, thats why you can easily swap acura rsx and acura integra engines/parts into like honda civic's, its all one company, nubs man
For all you idiots who keep saying it's acura it's acura.. "Acura" is Honda.. just as "Lexus" is Toyota.. as so on with other car brands.. Acura, Lexus etc is just the "luxury" line of Honda, Toyota etc.. look at the Acura CSX and Honda Civic, same car, interchangeable parts, exterior is a little different and in the luxury line Acura CSX it has a Honda Civic Si motor that has been detuned, learn your facts. It's a Honda, done deal, originated from the Japanese people and therefore is a Honda
@SULERONE1 the one who is dumb is YOU.. Honda sold the NSX in US under the brand Acura, so that means Acura NSX is just a mere rebadged version of Honda NSX..
educate yourself before making yourself look dumb..
@SULERONE1 - From 1990 (US model year 1991) to mid 2004, all NSXs were produced at Takanezawa R&D Plant in Tochigi, Japan. The production line was then moved to the R&D Plant in Suzuka, Japan until production stopped in 2005. NSXs were branded as Hondas, except those destined for the USA were branded Acura. The Acura badged cars were approximately 50% of production. The Honda NSX-R never came to the USA, and many options, like navigation, were never available in the USA cars.
BMW X5's are for rich wives mate. Maybe if you took a better interest in cars you would have chosen better. Do you look like the other blokes driving them with their fake tan and oversized sunglasses. Oh and I drive a 2010 audi rs6 saloon - why dont you google that and watch your manhood shrink. Good day
@imissthe80s100 people who have nice things and don't take care of them are called spoiled little bitches who's parents never taught them the value of a dollar. Learn to appreciate what you have and to take care of it, because when your at 8k miles before an oil change and your beamer breaks down........you'll wish you took better care of it. or when your windshield becomes so dirty that your wipers cant remove rain....when you crash you'll wish you cleaned your car. Also learn to not troll.-_-
@AntRuggiero Pretty much the same internals but usually have different tunes for different domestic markets, and usually the vehicles made for the Japanese market will have slightly more HP than the same car made for the US - apart from that engines are practically the same (except for maybe extra emissions stuff for the US and vise versa).
@AntRuggiero - All NSXs came out off the same assembly lines. 1st in Tochigi, Japan, then in mid-2004 they were built in Suzuka, Japan. All NSXs were Honda except those destined for the USA, which wore Acura badges. Honda was always improving the NSX. As the years rolled by, Honda improved HP, trannys, brakes, suspension, electronics, and firmware. The coupes are lighter and more ridged than NSX-Ts. 2002+ NSXs had improved aerodynamics and HID headlights.
@AirsoftKY - Actually, insurance is not that bad... I pay pretty close the same as my other cars. My NSX is supercharged and I get ~18 MPG city and ~25MPG highway.
VTEC is NOT "V-tec", "V-TEC", "V-tech", "V-TECH", "VTECH", "V-TEK", "vtech", "vtec", "vortech", "Vtec", or "Vtech". It's CAPITAL VTEC. No dashes, no lower case, no extra letters, no anything other than the correct and only spelling of VTEC. If you cannot respect the technology and simply use the correct spelling, you do not deserve what it gives you.
@MrLoren41191 I am sorry but you are mistaken. your rsx does not have vtec... It has IVTEC ya know that smart vtec thang.lol. oh and that guy that replied to your comment is a waste of air.if you capitalize or dont EVERYBODY knows what vtec is....
Give me a break. I'm just sayin - it's a BASIC thing. Is too hard to write that correctly? Whatever, itsn't most important. Better enjoy the sound, cause it's music for ears :)
@ratyo88 some people are just lazy to capitalize and punctuate crap dude...get over it. its not like people get graded for posting something on youtube.you just sound like a dick when you correct people for that.
@ratyo88 Shit-tec? Fag-tec? I think my car is so sweet cause it has vtaaaacccc! I hit that shit so hard the other day it was fucking awesome. Just you vttaaaacccc loving faggots know, every car maker has had and still produces a variable cam motor. It's not a Honda only thing they're just the ones who paste it all over their cars that run 15.1! Vtttaaacccc is a joke and so are you faggot!
what the fuck. Honda is fucking amazing. They can make any engine sound the same, their i4's v6's v10s, fuck, they sound the same its amazing. Other car makers when they try to make engines it all has characteristics, v10's warble, i4's bass or weakness, v6's med-warble, v8's roar. Honda seems to make all of their engines sound like a mix of them all.
it was a reference joke... because you know how with V-TEC you can switch between an economy and performance cam profile at a specific RPM? Well they've applied the concept to the pistons, which will be able to switch between a economy cycle and an performance cycle. Hence the joke, VTEC on pistons.
I know about all dat good stuff but, isnt it still impressing? I mean aerodynamics is a huge part of it but weight, and power matters too. im just saying its awesome how they engineered it and people should stop judging it by the small engine or some fancy looks missing. ya know
true honda/japanese engineering for it to have such a high top speed for a non carbonfiber v6 car. not to mention whole bunch of other fancy things....
@jdmtwinky top speed has nothing to do with carbon fiber or not, or that its a v6., you have been misled. its all about aerodynamics. any sportscar with good aerodynamics will be capable of going 160 mph with only 290hp v6. i believe stock toyota supra does it too, 280-320hp and 160mph+++ heck a crapy 1992 eclipse will easily go 160mph with 290 hp, or a chevy cavalier for that matter, same story lol.
An individual who insults the Nsx is simply displaying their own ignorance. Titanium connecting rods, six bolt main caps, all aluminum body and chassis, manual transmission that has a fluid pump.Just a couple things that set this car apart. It is so well balanced it doesn't need huge power to out-track awd cars with double the whp. With the adoption of the Aem Ems and companies such as Lovefab, a turbo nsx can compete against almost anything. Do some research or watch best motoring type r battle
@donald4494 that's true! NSX has power and perfect weight distribution. it's an engeneering master piece. just the opposite of what american crap cars are. all about power power power...which shamefully doesn't even get you anywhere, because the chassis/steering/suspension/weight distribution doesn't mean anything for americans. all they want is smoking their tiers and make ridiculous noises outta their cars. now THAT'S what i call racer RICER!!
@donald4494 titanium connecting rods? six bolt main caps?that nsx engine is worthless. think about it, its a v6 engine, based on the accord v6 lol. makes 280hp stock with almost no potential, stock engine can handle 450whp under extreme stress, not very impressive. i dont understand why honda put such a crappy engine in such an amazing body, the nsx body it self is impressive, handles well and lightweight. the engine though is a disgrace. they could of gone with a longitudinal mounted v8.
@mustang4sho 2jzgte would be an excellent engine for the nsx, with plenty of power potential. the problem is, putting a 2jzgte in a nsx body is nearly impossible. the 2jz is a long inline 6 engine and will only fit in a longitudinal position. unfortunatly the nsx stock engine/transmission setup is transverse, making putting the 2jz nearly impossible. to fit a 2jz in there you would have cut up/modify alot of the nsx's body to fit the 2jz in there, you would also a special porsche transmission
@Redline2695 PART ONE: lol are you stalking my comments and defending hondas where ever i go lol? relax haha im not a honda hater lol if thats what your worried about :) NSX is a beautifull car, i considered buying one, but went with a Corvette Z06 instead. I tottaly will say the NSX looks better then my Z06. but it does have a CRAPPY ENGINE, back in 1990 when it was developed, it was meant to go up against "Ferrari 328" that ferrari had 270hp, and 1990 NSX made 270HP.
@Redline2695 PART TWO: The NSX was a great competition for ferrari 328, that ferrari was the intended target car. but heres what happened, over the years ferrari along with other cheaper sportscars improved thier v8 engines/models and by 2006 ferrari had 483hp. The 2006 Corvette Z06 had 505HP. Yet the 2005 NSX had only 290hp and still stuck with its v6. After 2005 stopped being produced, it just wasent compettive anymore. The NSX engine in 1990 was amazing, and in 2006 it was not so amazing.
@Redline2695 PART THREE: The NSX body kept being amazing, but over the years, the v6 seriously lagged behind. I will admit, i was obsessed with the NSX and still am, how too put a bigger V8 engine in there and make more power! but its nearly impossible, due to the transverse engine setup, the NSX is stuck with the V6 C32 engine. So yes beutifull car, but crappy engine! especially because its nearly impossible to swap anything better in there without cutting up the frame.
@e320e98u uhhh... the nsx engine is far from crappy !!! and why would i want to drop another engine in there when i can just work on the stock motor and build it.and the reason why it doesnt have that much hp is because that was the 2nd generation of the nsx that came out 2002. sure it only has 290hp but what other car do you know that has a top speed of 160mph with only 290hp??? the nsx r has 276hp and the top speed is 174mph!!!! not to mention the nsx isnt carbon fiber like a vette
@Redline2695 part 1: first question, do you own a nsx? you know anything about c32 engine? stock motor will push 450whp and that is the limit, sure you can fully build the engine and be capable of making maybe 650whp, with a big turbo. with a big turbo you will have serious turbo lag, which is exactly against the spirit of the car thats meant to be a roadracer/autocross, it will suffer with turbo lag, which is inavoidable with the 3.0 engine. therefore it needs a bigger motor
@e320e98u no i dont own an nsx and im pretty sure a stock nsx motor can make more than 450hp stock.and a fully built nsx will make WAY over 650hp.and the 2nd gen nsx has a 3.2L oooo yea my point was when i said it ran over 170mph was this is its one of the only sportscars on the planet that doesn't even have 300hp and can go 174mph BONE STOCK if it needed a v8 honda would have put one in it. honda is known for doing big things with smaller engines
@Redline2695 part 1: you dont own an nsx, while i considered buying one and did alot of reasearch about it. c30 and c32, stock engines are capable of making 450whp underboost, after that they explode. dont believe me? go research on nsxprime.com. a fully built engine could possibly make more then 650rwhp, but it will have massive turbo lag, and wont make power until high rpms, which is unacceptable on this car, it will suffer at autocross, because of the lag and useless powerband
@e320e98u well im pretty sure a stock nsx can make more than 450hp when stock. i know for a fact a nsx motor can make way more than 650hp built.and i never said the nsx was the only car one tha planet that can go +160mph with less than 300hp i said 1 of the only. btw the nsx that goes 174mph only has 276hp not 290hp
@Redline2695 no lol, it doesnt live too more then 450hp on stock motor, if you think it does prove it. yess it may make more then 650hp built, but do you know what turbo lag is? or a terrible powerband because of the huge turbo? for that motor too make that power the car will be uncompetive on the racetrack, so its pointless. one of the only cars? if lowly porsche boxter can go 160++ then so can any other real sportscar: 282 hp BMW M3 E36, 276hp skyline gtr r34, and many others
@e320e98u let me rephrase myself i know for a FACT a nsx can make WAY more than 650hp and yes i do know what turbo lag is... the bmw m3 e36 that ran 160mph had 317hp not 282hp. the porsche does go 165mph with 266hp but the 0-60 is 5.7 seconds and the r34s 0-60 is 5.1 seconds not to mention the r34 is turbo unlike the nsx the nsx's 0-60 is 4.7 if the nsx had 500hp the top speed on the car would be out of this world but im pretty sure honda wouldnt do that plus there trying to atick to there roots
@Redline2695 i think we are weveing off, the fact that nsx goes 165++ plus with 290hp is impressive, but its pretty normal for a car with that much power to go that fast. but the original point was that 290hp is not enough, when competing cars have 400-500hp v8 engines and weigh the same and have equal aerodynamics, yet the other cars accelerate much faster out of a corner.
@Redline2695 part 2: nsx is not the only car that OFFICIALLY NOTED goes 165mph, and 172 mph for 2002 and up. take the misreble porsche boxter. 2003 Porsche Boxter S, it makes only 258hp and goes 164mph. in first generation NSX needs 270hp to go 165. Boxter only needs 258hp to go 164mph lol. in second generation NSX has 290hp and goes 172mph, how fast do you think Boxter would go if it had 290HP haha. so nsx is not the only car on the planet that goes this fast with little hp.
@e320e98u - FYI... There are at least two NSXs with over 1000HP. Both cars are turbo'd... and yes, they have "built" motors. Both cars are driven regularly on the street. One was built by LoveFab in Traverse City, MI. The other was built but Autowave in Huntington Beach, CA., and it won the Ultimate Street Car Championship in 2006.
@Redline2695 part 2: if the car is going too make more power without pesky turbo lag it will need more liters, more litters = bigger engine (v8) therefore it needs a better engine unless you like 300hp. the corvette is not a carbon fiber frame, and nsx is aluminum frame by the way. okay sure it can do 160mph with 290hp and the point is? does it makes the car faster? knowing that it has 290 and goes 160mph? the car is stuck at 160mph, while other cars go way faster with more hp
@Redline2695 part 3: saying the car can do 160mph with 290hp is just hillarious. its like some people say ooh my honda s2000 is only 2 liters but makes 240hp, thats 220hp per liter!! while my car is 5.7liters and makes 425hp, thats only 74hp per liter!! so sad for me, such inefficient engine. but good news is my car has 425 hp and s2000 has 240hp, thefore my car IS FASTER. the nsx power too max top speed ratio is impressive, but it doesnt make the car go faster.
@e320e98u you forgot too mention the most important bit .The NSX was also developed with the help of the greatest ever F1 champion Driver Ayrton Senna who was driving for Mclaren Honda at the time .Ayrtons race input and the honda engineers helped develope a chassis that was second too none and sstreets ahead of anything else in price range and well beyond
@MrScruff1975 yep nsx did have an amazing interesting development. and what alot of people dont know is that MCLAREN F1 IS PARTIALLY BASED ON THE NSX. gordon murray was so impressed with the nsx that he wanted his new supercar mclaren f1 too feel like a nsx, he actually bought and owned a nsx and was very impressed with its handling/manners, though mclaren f1 designer did not make the mistake that honda made, he put a v12 in his supercar that was somewhat based on nsx lol
@Redline2695 part 1: okay now your talking about 0-60 times? and that skyline is turbo? who cares if its turbo, turbo or not, hp is the same. 280 hp turbo and 280hp naturaly aspirated is the same damn thing. dont weer off point even more and start comparing 0-60 times. the point is that nsx is slower then other sportscars in its class. it has less hp, and that makes it WAY SLOWER, 270/290 HP and weighs about ~3050lbs depending on trim. sure it might be able too squeeze out a tiny
@Redline2695 part 2: bit more performance out of its 270/290HP then other sport cars, sure ill admit that because im not going too sit and compare every single spec of every sportcar vs NSX. but the point is NSX is SLOWER then all the sports cars in its class/price, because its crappy engine makes little hp. all you have to do to compare sport cars performance, is compare the how much horsepower per weight, its called "HP to weight ratio." the less pounds per hp, the faster!
@Redline2695 part 3: all of NSX's competitors have superior, hp to weight ratio, and those cars areWAY faster, NSX is WAY SLOWER. NSX 3050LBS / 290HP = 10.51 pounds per hp. Corvette C5 Z06 3115lbs / 425hp = 7.69 pounds per hp. Corvette C6 Z06 3150lbs / 505hp = 6.23 pounds per hp. 2003 Porsche 911turbo 2920lbs / 420hp = 6.95 pounds perhp.all of these rival cars kick the crap out of the nsx in every single way! because of the weak nsx engine. NSX competes with STIs and EVOs lol
@e320e98u now lets see the corvette zr1 has 638hp with a top speed of 205mph and weighs 3350lbs now the nsx and mclaren F1 are brothers that are both over 10 years old in design F1 weighs 2,513lbs with 617hp and the top speed is 242mph and the nsx r gt weights 2,794lbs with 276hp and the top speed is 174mph... so spoon made the same nsx and made another version for the US with honda which weighs 2,425lbs now if you get to 650hp with the nsx im pretty sure it will rival its brother the mclaren F1
@Redline2695 part 1: sure you can turbo the nsx and get roughly double the hp. you can also turbo the mclaren f1 and double its hp from 617hp too 1200hp, you can also turbo the corvette zr1 and double the hp from 638 too 1200hp.you can turbo and double the hp of any of these cars, but going turbo will create 1-2 seconds turbo throttle lag, and if youre at wrong engine rpm u will not make serious power cause of the turbo. this is why turboing is not viable
@Redline2695 part 2: Putting a big turbo thats required for big power on a car thats built for roadrace/autocross/circuit, is dumb, it will ruin the cars handling.coming out of a corner you step on the throttle and u dont have full power cause of turbo lag. Turbo setups are only viable for drag racing and top speed runs.so turbo is not an option. but okay, if youre going to turbo the nsx, then be fair and turbo the zr1 and mclaren f1. And once again the NSX is the SLOWWWER car.
@e320e98u what im saying is if the mclaren F1 can go 242mph with 617hp and weighs 2513lbs the nsx that weighs 2425lbs with 600hp should be just as fast and who said anything about turbos im talking about superchrgers and bringing the hp up to the 600hp range with V12 mclaren and the supercharged vette and the nsx doesnt have a accord or acura legend engine either
@Redline2695 part 1: lol you are so blind. stock nsx is slower, then corvette z06 zr1, 911turbo. a modified corvette zr1 with double the hp will be 1200hp, a nsx with doubled hp will have 600hp. a corvette will beat it no matter what! as far as aerodynamics go, NSX+corvette+mclaren, have similiar aerodynamic drag, and with equal hp will do fairly similiar top speed. nsx does not defy the laws of physics, its not going to go supefast with little hp
@e320e98u the same way the vette and F1 can make 1200hp so can the nsx btw the nsx that weighs 2425lbs is made for the american market since there was no nsx r gt for america and one that legend is a 2.0L the 2nd gen nsx is a 3.2L
@Redline2695 - A normal NSX weighted between ~2,976 lb for an early model coupe, to ~3,193lb for a late model NSX-T. The 2002 NSX-R weighed 2,809lb. Honda Motor Company advertised the "curb weight" of my 2002 NSX-T at 3,153 lbs. I have removed some items, added a supercharger, and corner balanced it with all fluids full. The corner balance scales showed 2997lbs. "Curb weight" usually means all fluids full... but the UK differs from the US as the UK adds the weight of the driver.
@Redline2695 - Yes... of course. There is much talk about it within the NSX community. There is mixed feelings about it, but overall somewhat positive. If it had a 500+HP V10, the response would be much better. :-)
@nsx1com or they can just turbo charge and still have a light car and probably get batter gas mileage than a v10 or make it 500hp with what they currently have and dont forget the car is suppose to be realesed in 2015 which gives them at least 2 more years to work on the car
Honda 3.2L V6 is no joke...those engines scream. Nice to hear that for a change, opposed to the inline 4 which we've all seen so often
TequilaAssassin4eva 2 hours ago
no fuelcut sound?
bitkarek 1 day ago
i know the nsx is honda made but it should just be "THE" NSX
xOoA7XoOx 2 days ago
stock fourtrax sounds much better
m3a12as4 2 days ago
@alex52184 Then tell her to eat less beans
MrAleksandarDzever 6 days ago
No Vtec?
andrewpauls777 1 week ago
@andrewpauls777 Vtec engagement is at 5500rpm, around 0:15 in the video
scorp965 1 week ago
@scorp965 Eh I kinda hear it I guess
andrewpauls777 1 week ago
@andrewpauls777 No way man ;) this is NSX and have a FULL VTEC 3.2i
UpOnOnee 1 day ago
my moms fiat sounds better than that. lol.
alex52184 1 week ago
when you aim for 500+ hp your probably not to worried about mileage, and if you are by a tesla roadster cause they are bad ass as fuck too
matrix4111 1 week ago
wow, is this actually an american-tuned car that revs over 7k?! HAHA
JackAr1a 2 weeks ago
@JackAr1a My BOSS 302 redlines at 8.5k after a quick flash tune and can hold that for 8 sec.
MaLeDiiCeNT 2 weeks ago
@MaLeDiiCeNT not bad man, i didn't see any videos on your channel, got any of your car?
JackAr1a 2 weeks ago
simply calling it a "honda" is almost insulting.
LOLHICRONO 2 weeks ago
nice, but check the mclaren mp 4/6
v12 honda.... best ever
REVs99 2 weeks ago
the only good sounding honda ever would b a better title
LOGIC42369 2 weeks ago
@LOGIC42369 this is true :D
ElegyXD 2 weeks ago
Such a lovely car, Honda or Acura.
Johny40Se7en 2 weeks ago
Am i the only one who was expecting a backfire?
MrKidTheMan 3 weeks ago 57
@MrKidTheMan cats and a tune not done with a calculator usually does good things.
jarjarlol 2 weeks ago
@MrKidTheMan backfires are for cars using more gas than needed...
Honda uses exactly as much as needed...!
xenoo4life 1 week ago
Not just a honda. Honda NSX.
durabrigt 3 weeks ago
just had an orgasm ..
Mynstroop 3 weeks ago
Never seen a dyno like that, what's it called? O_o
LimitlessAeon619 3 weeks ago
@LimitlessAeon619 HUB Dyno
cunt3d 3 weeks ago
@cunt3d
Guess I probably could have assumed that.. Was a dumb moment for me, ty :)
LimitlessAeon619 3 weeks ago
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRP
braxbrax12 3 weeks ago
@jspahn420 No it won't.
JMTxProductions 3 weeks ago
Now why can't Honda/Acura make their other cars sound like this instead of fart cannons :/
armenchik619 3 weeks ago
@armenchik619
"Because Honda's freaking stubborn! They could make some of the best (sport) cars on the road...but just don't.
The most we have is....the V6 Accord, V6 TSX and SH-AWD TL
...but that's still not enough! LOL
CaptainOmar 3 weeks ago
@CaptainOmar I swear man! Hondas beginning to tick me off with their continuous CR"V's, Civics, Accords, Blah blahhh, Give us SPORTSS CARS! -________-
armenchik619 3 weeks ago
@CaptainOmar I think you fail to realize the S2000 is a far more tunable car and much more affordable - with boost it easily spanks exotic cars while still offering razor sharp handling....made for more than 10 years its been available to you for many years - few people bothered to tune it - but as time passed and people tweak it more mand more folks are starting to realize Honda gave us a supra --- 700whp stock block F20Cs --- 10/9 sec stock block S2000s....much much cheaper than a Supra
SergEK9 2 weeks ago
@SergEK9
I think you fail to realize the point of my previous comment. We need NEW sports cars.
CaptainOmar 2 weeks ago
To the dumbasses saying "that's VTEC" you should learn what vtec even is, its just a variable cam! The vtec in your 1.8litre civic doesn't do shit.
7bphillips13 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
Uncommonfern 1 month ago
its still a honda
kalschmikov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It sounds like every honda a peice of shit
96bweb 1 month ago
@96bweb if what you drive is better than this than your doing something. this car is no piece of shit. these are high end cars capable of many things. just because its a Honda doesn't mean its a piece. and also fyi, any Honda will out last any Chevy.
jspahn420 1 month ago
@96bweb This is a NSX u fucking retard, learn something kid and dont watch these videos untill your balls drop.
TheDM75 4 weeks ago
Nice
irelandbloke 1 month ago
God I love this car ... Got to take some sweet pics and got to sit in it ... It comes up to my waist and I'm only 6'3" if you want pics text me 2544664697
blucobra5 1 month ago
now take it outside the garage.
enjoipandas 1 month ago
NSX, my dreamcar
KiterTMK 1 month ago
i thought it was supposed to sound good? nobody chew me out, please. just my opinion.
11ellswray 1 month ago
acura and honda is the same thing, acura is just hondas "luxury" line. same main company though, thats why you can easily swap acura rsx and acura integra engines/parts into like honda civic's, its all one company, nubs man
h1roshi918 1 month ago
For all you idiots who keep saying it's acura it's acura.. "Acura" is Honda.. just as "Lexus" is Toyota.. as so on with other car brands.. Acura, Lexus etc is just the "luxury" line of Honda, Toyota etc.. look at the Acura CSX and Honda Civic, same car, interchangeable parts, exterior is a little different and in the luxury line Acura CSX it has a Honda Civic Si motor that has been detuned, learn your facts. It's a Honda, done deal, originated from the Japanese people and therefore is a Honda
SHIFTtack 1 month ago
you guys are dumb, when the nsx was first put on production lines it was by ACURA from 90- 94 in the late 90's honda brought it back from 96 to 98
SULERONE1 1 month ago
@SULERONE1 Wow YOU are dumb. They are the same exact car. Different badges. The car is sold as an Acura in the U.S. and as a Honda elsewhere.
MrBarrett4bama 1 month ago
@MrBarrett4bama i think as an aucra is a better name for it...
OptimusPrimeLeader1 1 month ago
@OptimusPrimeLeader1 Why?
MrBarrett4bama 1 month ago
@MrBarrett4bama because it fits... honda.. is like really gay in my opinon...
OptimusPrimeLeader1 1 month ago
@OptimusPrimeLeader1 You are a gay turd Optimus
fluffysnakeful 1 month ago
@SULERONE1 the one who is dumb is YOU.. Honda sold the NSX in US under the brand Acura, so that means Acura NSX is just a mere rebadged version of Honda NSX..
educate yourself before making yourself look dumb..
NEWanjingkepala3 1 month ago 44
@NEWanjingkepala3
Honestly Both cars are the same shit just under a different name, like Chevy, GMC, and Cadillac
MadDog5292 3 weeks ago
@NEWanjingkepala3 who cares though? there the same fucking car.
240sxDrifterr 6 days ago
@SULERONE1 - From 1990 (US model year 1991) to mid 2004, all NSXs were produced at Takanezawa R&D Plant in Tochigi, Japan. The production line was then moved to the R&D Plant in Suzuka, Japan until production stopped in 2005. NSXs were branded as Hondas, except those destined for the USA were branded Acura. The Acura badged cars were approximately 50% of production. The Honda NSX-R never came to the USA, and many options, like navigation, were never available in the USA cars.
nsx1com 1 week ago
V TEC ENGINE IN THAT BITCH ;)
MrBobbyloc 1 month ago
Yummy!!
aahumada3915439154 1 month ago
Best sounding Honda = Indy Racing League
RabiaEx 1 month ago
If you think BMW are that good lets talk bout reliabilty not luxury .... fucken idiots...
snoozefest41 1 month ago
rice
4g63jojo 1 month ago
@imissthe80s100
why hate???
Nelis1992 1 month ago
@imissthe80s100
BMW X5's are for rich wives mate. Maybe if you took a better interest in cars you would have chosen better. Do you look like the other blokes driving them with their fake tan and oversized sunglasses. Oh and I drive a 2010 audi rs6 saloon - why dont you google that and watch your manhood shrink. Good day
richardthek 1 month ago
@imissthe80s100 for some reason BMW drivers are all ass holes
6Scitt9 1 month ago
@6Scitt9
Only the //M drivers are
Thtblkbrit 1 month ago
<3 it
nadpomorzanin08j4 1 month ago
no huge external fan cooling the car on dyno = bad
walperstyle 2 months ago
thats how the Japanese use a dyno!
guy990 2 months ago
@imissthe80s100 people who have nice things and don't take care of them are called spoiled little bitches who's parents never taught them the value of a dollar. Learn to appreciate what you have and to take care of it, because when your at 8k miles before an oil change and your beamer breaks down........you'll wish you took better care of it. or when your windshield becomes so dirty that your wipers cant remove rain....when you crash you'll wish you cleaned your car. Also learn to not troll.-_-
Pockerdepper 2 months ago
nix doesn't necessarily have to go under the rice burner category in my book ;)
kiiler car bro
92SallyGT 2 months ago
This is Hondas Ferrari...
Russak037 2 months ago
@Russak037 Honda's*
ILikeReallyBigButts 1 month ago
The Best Sounding Honda Ever?
Definitely yes.
The Best Honda Ever?
Definitely yes.
The Best Japanese Car Ever?
Definitely a strong contender.
WittiestUsernameEver 2 months ago
APOCALYPSE
MrhdiR 2 months ago
-Holy Mother Of God. . .
TheEDMlover 2 months ago
dear boss, add a couple 0's to the end of my cheques....
TheJordanGraff 2 months ago
this is because it isnt one of those stupid civics with the huge mufflers! This is an NSX!
out of curiosity, is the acura NSX or honda NSX better?
AntRuggiero 2 months ago
Comment removed
GoneBadKiwi 2 months ago
@GoneBadKiwi yeah i knew that but i wasnt sure if they had any different internals..
AntRuggiero 2 months ago
@AntRuggiero Pretty much the same internals but usually have different tunes for different domestic markets, and usually the vehicles made for the Japanese market will have slightly more HP than the same car made for the US - apart from that engines are practically the same (except for maybe extra emissions stuff for the US and vise versa).
GoneBadKiwi 2 months ago
@AntRuggiero - All NSXs came out off the same assembly lines. 1st in Tochigi, Japan, then in mid-2004 they were built in Suzuka, Japan. All NSXs were Honda except those destined for the USA, which wore Acura badges. Honda was always improving the NSX. As the years rolled by, Honda improved HP, trannys, brakes, suspension, electronics, and firmware. The coupes are lighter and more ridged than NSX-Ts. 2002+ NSXs had improved aerodynamics and HID headlights.
nsx1com 1 week ago
Only Honda I would ever buy. This is a piece of art. unlike civics.
caguamassatanicas 2 months ago
@caguamassatanicas I would buy it too, wouldn't break down, but the price, insurance, and gas are another story
AirsoftKY 2 months ago
@AirsoftKY - Actually, insurance is not that bad... I pay pretty close the same as my other cars. My NSX is supercharged and I get ~18 MPG city and ~25MPG highway.
nsx1com 1 week ago
whats the pricetag on one of those?
more than you can afford pal, V-TEC.
LOL
ThatOneCoolGuy77 2 months ago 50
@ThatOneCoolGuy77 Vtec is correct and and an nsx isnt to expensive to be honest
RoverMini94 2 months ago
@RoverMini94 i would have 1
CivicJay21 2 months ago
@CivicJay21 emmm ok, haha a probs would aswell
RoverMini94 2 months ago
@ThatOneCoolGuy77 (Brian's Response) Are you kidding? I got a Supra that i Super-tuned
gtasaplayer12345 1 month ago
@ThatOneCoolGuy77
Its actually, 'whats the retail on one of those' then you got it right :D
Just saying
zShow0ffz 1 month ago
@ThatOneCoolGuy77 that really did make me LOL
slideways89 1 month ago
@ThatOneCoolGuy77
Man...
VTEC is NOT "V-tec", "V-TEC", "V-tech", "V-TECH", "VTECH", "V-TEK", "vtech", "vtec", "vortech", "Vtec", or "Vtech". It's CAPITAL VTEC. No dashes, no lower case, no extra letters, no anything other than the correct and only spelling of VTEC. If you cannot respect the technology and simply use the correct spelling, you do not deserve what it gives you.
ratyo88 1 month ago
@ratyo88 i have a 2004 acura rsx-s and my engine says Vtec just like that on it... so wtf are you talking about?
MrLoren41191 1 month ago
@MrLoren41191
That's right - VTEC, not V-TEC or whatever. Black isn't white. Just sayin'...
ratyo88 1 month ago
@MrLoren41191 I am sorry but you are mistaken. your rsx does not have vtec... It has IVTEC ya know that smart vtec thang.lol. oh and that guy that replied to your comment is a waste of air.if you capitalize or dont EVERYBODY knows what vtec is....
Bamavol89 3 weeks ago
@ratyo88
all i hear is yer bichin.. ohh sorry i meant with a capital 'I' , "you", and " bitching" ok? because i totally respect bitches ya know
jdmtwinky 1 month ago
@jdmtwinky
Give me a break. I'm just sayin - it's a BASIC thing. Is too hard to write that correctly? Whatever, itsn't most important. Better enjoy the sound, cause it's music for ears :)
ratyo88 1 month ago
@ratyo88 some people are just lazy to capitalize and punctuate crap dude...get over it. its not like people get graded for posting something on youtube.you just sound like a dick when you correct people for that.
Bamavol89 3 weeks ago
@ratyo88 btw you have errors in your post too...just sayin
Bamavol89 3 weeks ago
@ratyo88 Shit-tec? Fag-tec? I think my car is so sweet cause it has vtaaaacccc! I hit that shit so hard the other day it was fucking awesome. Just you vttaaaacccc loving faggots know, every car maker has had and still produces a variable cam motor. It's not a Honda only thing they're just the ones who paste it all over their cars that run 15.1! Vtttaaacccc is a joke and so are you faggot!
FuckToyota440 1 month ago
@FuckToyota440
GTFO you dickhead and go cry somewhere else.
ratyo88 1 month ago
not a honda...Acura...
AirsoftKY 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@AirsoftKY acura is made by honda do your research better
sejfiu100 2 months ago
@AirsoftKY Could be a Japanese NSX, which would make it a Honda.
ilangsfs 2 months ago 28
@AirsoftKY they only put the acura badge on the nsx in america.
broncokonco 2 months ago
@AirsoftKY
when was the last time you popped the hood on a acura....they all say honda motor co. on the engines retard.
steveeeeboi 2 months ago
@steveeeeboi if you custom a car and put a chevy 350 in a mazda rx7, its not chevy car
AirsoftKY 2 months ago
@AirsoftKY If you can't form a correct sentence no one can understand the retarded things you say.
ComptechTypeS 2 months ago
@AirsoftKY Same thing boyo!
TheEthanFbaby 1 month ago
ehh NSX Father of ALL SPORTS CAR
Out5id3rr 2 months ago
what the fuck. Honda is fucking amazing. They can make any engine sound the same, their i4's v6's v10s, fuck, they sound the same its amazing. Other car makers when they try to make engines it all has characteristics, v10's warble, i4's bass or weakness, v6's med-warble, v8's roar. Honda seems to make all of their engines sound like a mix of them all.
ItsMrWinters 2 months ago
it was a reference joke... because you know how with V-TEC you can switch between an economy and performance cam profile at a specific RPM? Well they've applied the concept to the pistons, which will be able to switch between a economy cycle and an performance cycle. Hence the joke, VTEC on pistons.
musicmanvin1 2 months ago
revs just keep going
termantor28 2 months ago
Hell Yeah.. NSX Baby
iluvtekno 2 months ago
I know about all dat good stuff but, isnt it still impressing? I mean aerodynamics is a huge part of it but weight, and power matters too. im just saying its awesome how they engineered it and people should stop judging it by the small engine or some fancy looks missing. ya know
jdmtwinky 2 months ago
true honda/japanese engineering for it to have such a high top speed for a non carbonfiber v6 car. not to mention whole bunch of other fancy things....
jdmtwinky 2 months ago
@jdmtwinky top speed has nothing to do with carbon fiber or not, or that its a v6., you have been misled. its all about aerodynamics. any sportscar with good aerodynamics will be capable of going 160 mph with only 290hp v6. i believe stock toyota supra does it too, 280-320hp and 160mph+++ heck a crapy 1992 eclipse will easily go 160mph with 290 hp, or a chevy cavalier for that matter, same story lol.
e320e98u 2 months ago
.....Dear Santa:
woahITZscyan 3 months ago 34
still sounds like a fart cannon
jhiggi28 3 months ago
holy shit.. only shit..
claudio1532 3 months ago
haters = losers...
why hate so much! and bother to watch?
kohensanzo 3 months ago
It does sound very nice, just smoothly throughout the RPM band..!
Az0ngl33 3 months ago
@IIBYWATERII my "shit " nissan has 750 horsepower buddy.
ddustinb 3 months ago
@ddustinb We would really love to see your "750 hp" Datsun. Oh wait, you haven't put up a video of you driving it because you don't OWN one...
bigcamracing 3 months ago
rrrrrrRRRRROAAAAAARRRRRR!!!
noypi1995 3 months ago
Nsx, awesome.
Austinflank 3 months ago
i think a mosquito was just flying too close to the camera.
oilerman313131 3 months ago
Ayrton Senna helped in the development of this car. i thnk that speaks for itself...
skylineGTRB 3 months ago
sounds nice. win.
TCDF22 3 months ago
An individual who insults the Nsx is simply displaying their own ignorance. Titanium connecting rods, six bolt main caps, all aluminum body and chassis, manual transmission that has a fluid pump.Just a couple things that set this car apart. It is so well balanced it doesn't need huge power to out-track awd cars with double the whp. With the adoption of the Aem Ems and companies such as Lovefab, a turbo nsx can compete against almost anything. Do some research or watch best motoring type r battle
donald4494 3 months ago 58
@donald4494 that's true! NSX has power and perfect weight distribution. it's an engeneering master piece. just the opposite of what american crap cars are. all about power power power...which shamefully doesn't even get you anywhere, because the chassis/steering/suspension/weight distribution doesn't mean anything for americans. all they want is smoking their tiers and make ridiculous noises outta their cars. now THAT'S what i call racer RICER!!
Shuffle3956 3 months ago
@donald4494 titanium connecting rods? six bolt main caps?that nsx engine is worthless. think about it, its a v6 engine, based on the accord v6 lol. makes 280hp stock with almost no potential, stock engine can handle 450whp under extreme stress, not very impressive. i dont understand why honda put such a crappy engine in such an amazing body, the nsx body it self is impressive, handles well and lightweight. the engine though is a disgrace. they could of gone with a longitudinal mounted v8.
e320e98u 3 months ago
@e320e98u 2jz pal...Built 2jz and she'll be all set to go.
mustang4sho 3 months ago
@mustang4sho 2jzgte would be an excellent engine for the nsx, with plenty of power potential. the problem is, putting a 2jzgte in a nsx body is nearly impossible. the 2jz is a long inline 6 engine and will only fit in a longitudinal position. unfortunatly the nsx stock engine/transmission setup is transverse, making putting the 2jz nearly impossible. to fit a 2jz in there you would have cut up/modify alot of the nsx's body to fit the 2jz in there, you would also a special porsche transmission
e320e98u 3 months ago
@e320e98u crappy engine ?????
Redline2695 3 months ago
@Redline2695 PART ONE: lol are you stalking my comments and defending hondas where ever i go lol? relax haha im not a honda hater lol if thats what your worried about :) NSX is a beautifull car, i considered buying one, but went with a Corvette Z06 instead. I tottaly will say the NSX looks better then my Z06. but it does have a CRAPPY ENGINE, back in 1990 when it was developed, it was meant to go up against "Ferrari 328" that ferrari had 270hp, and 1990 NSX made 270HP.
e320e98u 3 months ago
@Redline2695 PART TWO: The NSX was a great competition for ferrari 328, that ferrari was the intended target car. but heres what happened, over the years ferrari along with other cheaper sportscars improved thier v8 engines/models and by 2006 ferrari had 483hp. The 2006 Corvette Z06 had 505HP. Yet the 2005 NSX had only 290hp and still stuck with its v6. After 2005 stopped being produced, it just wasent compettive anymore. The NSX engine in 1990 was amazing, and in 2006 it was not so amazing.
e320e98u 3 months ago
@Redline2695 PART THREE: The NSX body kept being amazing, but over the years, the v6 seriously lagged behind. I will admit, i was obsessed with the NSX and still am, how too put a bigger V8 engine in there and make more power! but its nearly impossible, due to the transverse engine setup, the NSX is stuck with the V6 C32 engine. So yes beutifull car, but crappy engine! especially because its nearly impossible to swap anything better in there without cutting up the frame.
e320e98u 3 months ago
@e320e98u uhhh... the nsx engine is far from crappy !!! and why would i want to drop another engine in there when i can just work on the stock motor and build it.and the reason why it doesnt have that much hp is because that was the 2nd generation of the nsx that came out 2002. sure it only has 290hp but what other car do you know that has a top speed of 160mph with only 290hp??? the nsx r has 276hp and the top speed is 174mph!!!! not to mention the nsx isnt carbon fiber like a vette
Redline2695 3 months ago
@Redline2695 part 1: first question, do you own a nsx? you know anything about c32 engine? stock motor will push 450whp and that is the limit, sure you can fully build the engine and be capable of making maybe 650whp, with a big turbo. with a big turbo you will have serious turbo lag, which is exactly against the spirit of the car thats meant to be a roadracer/autocross, it will suffer with turbo lag, which is inavoidable with the 3.0 engine. therefore it needs a bigger motor
e320e98u 2 months ago
@e320e98u no i dont own an nsx and im pretty sure a stock nsx motor can make more than 450hp stock.and a fully built nsx will make WAY over 650hp.and the 2nd gen nsx has a 3.2L oooo yea my point was when i said it ran over 170mph was this is its one of the only sportscars on the planet that doesn't even have 300hp and can go 174mph BONE STOCK if it needed a v8 honda would have put one in it. honda is known for doing big things with smaller engines
Redline2695 2 months ago
@Redline2695 part 1: you dont own an nsx, while i considered buying one and did alot of reasearch about it. c30 and c32, stock engines are capable of making 450whp underboost, after that they explode. dont believe me? go research on nsxprime.com. a fully built engine could possibly make more then 650rwhp, but it will have massive turbo lag, and wont make power until high rpms, which is unacceptable on this car, it will suffer at autocross, because of the lag and useless powerband
e320e98u 2 months ago
@e320e98u well im pretty sure a stock nsx can make more than 450hp when stock. i know for a fact a nsx motor can make way more than 650hp built.and i never said the nsx was the only car one tha planet that can go +160mph with less than 300hp i said 1 of the only. btw the nsx that goes 174mph only has 276hp not 290hp
Redline2695 2 months ago
@Redline2695 no lol, it doesnt live too more then 450hp on stock motor, if you think it does prove it. yess it may make more then 650hp built, but do you know what turbo lag is? or a terrible powerband because of the huge turbo? for that motor too make that power the car will be uncompetive on the racetrack, so its pointless. one of the only cars? if lowly porsche boxter can go 160++ then so can any other real sportscar: 282 hp BMW M3 E36, 276hp skyline gtr r34, and many others
e320e98u 2 months ago
@e320e98u let me rephrase myself i know for a FACT a nsx can make WAY more than 650hp and yes i do know what turbo lag is... the bmw m3 e36 that ran 160mph had 317hp not 282hp. the porsche does go 165mph with 266hp but the 0-60 is 5.7 seconds and the r34s 0-60 is 5.1 seconds not to mention the r34 is turbo unlike the nsx the nsx's 0-60 is 4.7 if the nsx had 500hp the top speed on the car would be out of this world but im pretty sure honda wouldnt do that plus there trying to atick to there roots
Redline2695 2 months ago
@Redline2695 i think we are weveing off, the fact that nsx goes 165++ plus with 290hp is impressive, but its pretty normal for a car with that much power to go that fast. but the original point was that 290hp is not enough, when competing cars have 400-500hp v8 engines and weigh the same and have equal aerodynamics, yet the other cars accelerate much faster out of a corner.
e320e98u 2 months ago
@e320e98u btw the nsx that goes 174mph has 276hp as i stated before not 290hp
Redline2695 2 months ago
@Redline2695 part 2: nsx is not the only car that OFFICIALLY NOTED goes 165mph, and 172 mph for 2002 and up. take the misreble porsche boxter. 2003 Porsche Boxter S, it makes only 258hp and goes 164mph. in first generation NSX needs 270hp to go 165. Boxter only needs 258hp to go 164mph lol. in second generation NSX has 290hp and goes 172mph, how fast do you think Boxter would go if it had 290HP haha. so nsx is not the only car on the planet that goes this fast with little hp.
e320e98u 2 months ago
@e320e98u - FYI... There are at least two NSXs with over 1000HP. Both cars are turbo'd... and yes, they have "built" motors. Both cars are driven regularly on the street. One was built by LoveFab in Traverse City, MI. The other was built but Autowave in Huntington Beach, CA., and it won the Ultimate Street Car Championship in 2006.
nsx1com 1 week ago
@Redline2695 part 2: if the car is going too make more power without pesky turbo lag it will need more liters, more litters = bigger engine (v8) therefore it needs a better engine unless you like 300hp. the corvette is not a carbon fiber frame, and nsx is aluminum frame by the way. okay sure it can do 160mph with 290hp and the point is? does it makes the car faster? knowing that it has 290 and goes 160mph? the car is stuck at 160mph, while other cars go way faster with more hp
e320e98u 2 months ago
@Redline2695 part 3: saying the car can do 160mph with 290hp is just hillarious. its like some people say ooh my honda s2000 is only 2 liters but makes 240hp, thats 220hp per liter!! while my car is 5.7liters and makes 425hp, thats only 74hp per liter!! so sad for me, such inefficient engine. but good news is my car has 425 hp and s2000 has 240hp, thefore my car IS FASTER. the nsx power too max top speed ratio is impressive, but it doesnt make the car go faster.
e320e98u 2 months ago
@e320e98u you forgot too mention the most important bit .The NSX was also developed with the help of the greatest ever F1 champion Driver Ayrton Senna who was driving for Mclaren Honda at the time .Ayrtons race input and the honda engineers helped develope a chassis that was second too none and sstreets ahead of anything else in price range and well beyond
MrScruff1975 3 months ago
@MrScruff1975 yep nsx did have an amazing interesting development. and what alot of people dont know is that MCLAREN F1 IS PARTIALLY BASED ON THE NSX. gordon murray was so impressed with the nsx that he wanted his new supercar mclaren f1 too feel like a nsx, he actually bought and owned a nsx and was very impressed with its handling/manners, though mclaren f1 designer did not make the mistake that honda made, he put a v12 in his supercar that was somewhat based on nsx lol
e320e98u 2 months ago
@Redline2695 part 1: okay now your talking about 0-60 times? and that skyline is turbo? who cares if its turbo, turbo or not, hp is the same. 280 hp turbo and 280hp naturaly aspirated is the same damn thing. dont weer off point even more and start comparing 0-60 times. the point is that nsx is slower then other sportscars in its class. it has less hp, and that makes it WAY SLOWER, 270/290 HP and weighs about ~3050lbs depending on trim. sure it might be able too squeeze out a tiny
e320e98u 2 months ago
@Redline2695 part 2: bit more performance out of its 270/290HP then other sport cars, sure ill admit that because im not going too sit and compare every single spec of every sportcar vs NSX. but the point is NSX is SLOWER then all the sports cars in its class/price, because its crappy engine makes little hp. all you have to do to compare sport cars performance, is compare the how much horsepower per weight, its called "HP to weight ratio." the less pounds per hp, the faster!
e320e98u 2 months ago
@Redline2695 part 3: all of NSX's competitors have superior, hp to weight ratio, and those cars areWAY faster, NSX is WAY SLOWER. NSX 3050LBS / 290HP = 10.51 pounds per hp. Corvette C5 Z06 3115lbs / 425hp = 7.69 pounds per hp. Corvette C6 Z06 3150lbs / 505hp = 6.23 pounds per hp. 2003 Porsche 911turbo 2920lbs / 420hp = 6.95 pounds perhp.all of these rival cars kick the crap out of the nsx in every single way! because of the weak nsx engine. NSX competes with STIs and EVOs lol
e320e98u 2 months ago
@e320e98u now lets see the corvette zr1 has 638hp with a top speed of 205mph and weighs 3350lbs now the nsx and mclaren F1 are brothers that are both over 10 years old in design F1 weighs 2,513lbs with 617hp and the top speed is 242mph and the nsx r gt weights 2,794lbs with 276hp and the top speed is 174mph... so spoon made the same nsx and made another version for the US with honda which weighs 2,425lbs now if you get to 650hp with the nsx im pretty sure it will rival its brother the mclaren F1
Redline2695 2 months ago
@Redline2695 part 1: sure you can turbo the nsx and get roughly double the hp. you can also turbo the mclaren f1 and double its hp from 617hp too 1200hp, you can also turbo the corvette zr1 and double the hp from 638 too 1200hp.you can turbo and double the hp of any of these cars, but going turbo will create 1-2 seconds turbo throttle lag, and if youre at wrong engine rpm u will not make serious power cause of the turbo. this is why turboing is not viable
e320e98u 2 months ago
@Redline2695 part 2: Putting a big turbo thats required for big power on a car thats built for roadrace/autocross/circuit, is dumb, it will ruin the cars handling.coming out of a corner you step on the throttle and u dont have full power cause of turbo lag. Turbo setups are only viable for drag racing and top speed runs.so turbo is not an option. but okay, if youre going to turbo the nsx, then be fair and turbo the zr1 and mclaren f1. And once again the NSX is the SLOWWWER car.
e320e98u 2 months ago
@e320e98u what im saying is if the mclaren F1 can go 242mph with 617hp and weighs 2513lbs the nsx that weighs 2425lbs with 600hp should be just as fast and who said anything about turbos im talking about superchrgers and bringing the hp up to the 600hp range with V12 mclaren and the supercharged vette and the nsx doesnt have a accord or acura legend engine either
Redline2695 2 months ago
@Redline2695 part 1: lol you are so blind. stock nsx is slower, then corvette z06 zr1, 911turbo. a modified corvette zr1 with double the hp will be 1200hp, a nsx with doubled hp will have 600hp. a corvette will beat it no matter what! as far as aerodynamics go, NSX+corvette+mclaren, have similiar aerodynamic drag, and with equal hp will do fairly similiar top speed. nsx does not defy the laws of physics, its not going to go supefast with little hp
e320e98u 2 months ago
@e320e98u the same way the vette and F1 can make 1200hp so can the nsx btw the nsx that weighs 2425lbs is made for the american market since there was no nsx r gt for america and one that legend is a 2.0L the 2nd gen nsx is a 3.2L
Redline2695 2 months ago
@Redline2695 - A normal NSX weighted between ~2,976 lb for an early model coupe, to ~3,193lb for a late model NSX-T. The 2002 NSX-R weighed 2,809lb. Honda Motor Company advertised the "curb weight" of my 2002 NSX-T at 3,153 lbs. I have removed some items, added a supercharger, and corner balanced it with all fluids full. The corner balance scales showed 2997lbs. "Curb weight" usually means all fluids full... but the UK differs from the US as the UK adds the weight of the driver.
nsx1com 1 week ago
@nsx1com thanks for all the info bro have you seen the new nsx ?
Redline2695 1 week ago
@Redline2695 the concept is ugly as fuck...
GodsNotReal95 1 week ago
@GodsNotReal95 well thats your opnion buddy
Redline2695 1 week ago
@Redline2695 - Yes... of course. There is much talk about it within the NSX community. There is mixed feelings about it, but overall somewhat positive. If it had a 500+HP V10, the response would be much better. :-)
nsx1com 1 week ago
@nsx1com or they can just turbo charge and still have a light car and probably get batter gas mileage than a v10 or make it 500hp with what they currently have and dont forget the car is suppose to be realesed in 2015 which gives them at least 2 more years to work on the car
Redline2695 1 week ago