and still the people who wer so called flying those planes ARE STILL PILOTS TODAY IN SUDI ARABIA AND HAD THERE IDENTIT STOLEN THATS WHAT THE AMERICAN GOVERMENT SAID, ITS ALL LIES LIES LIES THE GOVERMENT WANT U TOO BE CONTROLLED, if u cross them hard enough, bye too u ,
@danapainterman I have noticed a huge increase in commercials on youtube - in general - over the past few days. I find nearly every second video - not just our channel - has an ad before it. They got us used to a commercial every now and then and now they've "jacked up the prices"!
@MrJeggus Here's the Frank DeMartini (principal designer) interview to which I was referring: ww w.youtube.co m/watch?v=sO1JxpVb2eU (remove the blanks). If you could point me to one in which fuel is mentioned, I'd be most grateful.
@MrJeggus No need to shout and swear. I have seen ONE (the principal) designer state the bldgs were designed to withstand impact from fully loaded 707, and perhaps multiple impacts, but I don't recall him mentioning fuel. Nor did he mention what might be the result of damage to the hat truss, as in WTC1. And the fact that something has never previously happened is not an argument that it cannot happen.
Mental Health Professionals Say that Questioning 9/11 Is the Sane Thing To Do.
Most mental health professionals have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is false, and that those who BELIEVE the official version suffer from defense mechanisms.
Sociologists have also shown that fear makes people believe false things the media reports about 9/11.
The 9/11 Commissioners, Congressional investigators and most of the world don’t believe the government’s description of events on 9/11.
Poor argument to state that no steel building ever collapsed due to fire. Towers 1 and 2 were a new type of steel structure using only core and perimeter columns connected by trusses, and cannot be compared to standard steel towers having columns and crossbeams throughout. Likewise bldg 7 was unique in that its lower 6 stories were a truss atop a pre-existing structure. Interior columns didn't start until the 7th floor. Destroy truss and expect a few floors of freefall.
@TonyLambregts True. NIST says catastrophic outer column failure at 12th or 13th floor proceding laterally across building. But this seems not to account for the observable uniformity of the collapse. If we thought NIST got it right, there wouldn't be 1600 architects & engineers pressing for a re-investigation, and we wouldn't be viewing videos like this and having this discussion.
Lousy argument to state that no steel building ever collapsed due to fire. Towers 1 and 2 were a new type of steel structure using only core and perimeter columns connected by trusses, and cannot be compared to standard steel towers having columns and crossbeams throughout. Likewise bldg 7 was unique in that its lower 6 stories were a truss atop a pre-existing structure. Interior columns didn't start until the 7th floor. Destroy truss and expect a few floors of freefall.
and still the people who wer so called flying those planes ARE STILL PILOTS TODAY IN SUDI ARABIA AND HAD THERE IDENTIT STOLEN THATS WHAT THE AMERICAN GOVERMENT SAID, ITS ALL LIES LIES LIES THE GOVERMENT WANT U TOO BE CONTROLLED, if u cross them hard enough, bye too u ,
PITBIKECRUSIN 19 hours ago
whats with all the pop ups on this video, i spend all my time deleteing pop up ads, cant watch video to much trash
danapainterman 1 week ago
@danapainterman I have noticed a huge increase in commercials on youtube - in general - over the past few days. I find nearly every second video - not just our channel - has an ad before it. They got us used to a commercial every now and then and now they've "jacked up the prices"!
2WAYFM 1 week ago
@MrJeggus Here's the Frank DeMartini (principal designer) interview to which I was referring: ww w.youtube.co m/watch?v=sO1JxpVb2eU (remove the blanks). If you could point me to one in which fuel is mentioned, I'd be most grateful.
FirstUsedBooks 4 months ago
@MrJeggus No need to shout and swear. I have seen ONE (the principal) designer state the bldgs were designed to withstand impact from fully loaded 707, and perhaps multiple impacts, but I don't recall him mentioning fuel. Nor did he mention what might be the result of damage to the hat truss, as in WTC1. And the fact that something has never previously happened is not an argument that it cannot happen.
FirstUsedBooks 4 months ago
Check-out a video series called THE DARKER SIDE OF 9/11 AND THE FRENCH CONNECTION if you want the real nuts and bolts hard truth about 9/11.
JaimesPhazon 4 months ago
“…9/11 is a modern-day IQ test….” – Mike Adams
satyavira 5 months ago
10 years later and still nothing. Humans are worthless scabs.
Seigu007 5 months ago
Heres a good news story:
scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1109/S00125/
The "Critics" of 9/11 Truth. Do They Have a Case? by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Global Research, Tues.September 13, 2011 3:42 PM.
SuperBigGulps 5 months ago
Mental Health Professionals Say that Questioning 9/11 Is the Sane Thing To Do.
Most mental health professionals have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is false, and that those who BELIEVE the official version suffer from defense mechanisms.
Sociologists have also shown that fear makes people believe false things the media reports about 9/11.
The 9/11 Commissioners, Congressional investigators and most of the world don’t believe the government’s description of events on 9/11.
SuperBigGulps 5 months ago
Poor argument to state that no steel building ever collapsed due to fire. Towers 1 and 2 were a new type of steel structure using only core and perimeter columns connected by trusses, and cannot be compared to standard steel towers having columns and crossbeams throughout. Likewise bldg 7 was unique in that its lower 6 stories were a truss atop a pre-existing structure. Interior columns didn't start until the 7th floor. Destroy truss and expect a few floors of freefall.
FirstUsedBooks 5 months ago
@FirstUsedBooks That's an interesting theory about building 7. However that is not what NIST agrees with.
TonyLambregts 5 months ago
@TonyLambregts True. NIST says catastrophic outer column failure at 12th or 13th floor proceding laterally across building. But this seems not to account for the observable uniformity of the collapse. If we thought NIST got it right, there wouldn't be 1600 architects & engineers pressing for a re-investigation, and we wouldn't be viewing videos like this and having this discussion.
FirstUsedBooks 5 months ago
Lousy argument to state that no steel building ever collapsed due to fire. Towers 1 and 2 were a new type of steel structure using only core and perimeter columns connected by trusses, and cannot be compared to standard steel towers having columns and crossbeams throughout. Likewise bldg 7 was unique in that its lower 6 stories were a truss atop a pre-existing structure. Interior columns didn't start until the 7th floor. Destroy truss and expect a few floors of freefall.
FirstUsedBooks 5 months ago