Create Health combining Cellular theory with Germ theory

[busybuzzbuzz]

germ theory does not exist so therre is no reason to included it into the Redox theory of disease. THis is a typical relativist compromise

[TeamingWithNature]

@busybuzzbuzz I appreciate your input and we can agree to disagree on this one. I do consider cellular theory to be the primary approach, but I disagree that 'germ theory does not exist'. For me, that's throwing the baby out with the bath water. Isn't it great that we can disagree and still discuss it!

Perhaps you are right that it's relativist stance. We are all related after all ;). I call it an integrated approach.

Peace.

To health!

[jett888]

"Disease is created by unhealthy conditions in the body" AND in the MIND- don't forget the mind! :~} thanks, great video! I thought Pasteur, on his death bed,

admitted that his theory was completely wrong.? It's all about the immune system and attitude.

[TeamingWithNature]

@jett888 Thank you for the reminder! I completely agree with you.  The mind plays a huge role in our immunity! Thanks for the kind comments!

To our health!

[mellraizer]

Bingo. ive come round to this way of thinking for the last couple of years after struggling with chronic illness. great vid!

It also never ceases to amaze me how our physiology can get locked into chronic stress (emotional + psychological factors) without us *conciously* realising. The knock on effect being that this undermines all the good work (bechamps side) as our systems reject & become 'intolerant' & 'reactive' to things that should be incredibly good for us.

[johnbleeker]

Very well done thanks for posting

[TeamingWithNature]

@johnbleeker My pleasure. Thanks for the kind feedback.

[prsglenn]

Also we can't foget that historically, Louis pasteur was a very cunning man, in that he stole many of his theories from leading people of the time and took the credit for it himself while not completely understanding the science. Like with the silk worms and bechamp. Bechamp had it down pat that it was parasitic, and pasteur openly denied it was a parasite, however pasteur eventually took the conclusion and credit as his own. I do agreee with both though. You explained it great, loved the graph.

[TeamingWithNature]

@prsglenn Yep, agreed again about Pasteur being more of a marketer than Bechamp. One account I read was Pasteur actually sat in on Bechamp's classes (and gleamed some ideas to promote as his own). Yeah, the graph was the distillation of the two and how they interact. Fun stuff!

Thanks for the kind words!

[prsglenn]

I didnt think anyone on youtube was talking about this! This subject Pasteur VS Bechamp had me puzzled for a while. If you go deeper, pasteur also says that the body is sterile, and it is attacked by the 'germs'. Pasteur also says that microbes and bacteria cannot change form, whereas Bechamp says that the body contains 'microbes' and lives harmoniously in balance, but in a more acidic state the microbes change between 1bacterial 2fungal 3viral. Like you say, it is a combination of both!!

[TeamingWithNature]

@prsglenn Agreed with your point about the morphing of bacteria etc from nonpathogenic to pathogenic based on the 'terrain' of the organism (our individual body). I had to trim some of the details of the differences based on my attempt to encapsulate this idea into a less than 10 minute video. I'm glad you enjoyed it. It sure has been a big 'a-ha' for me.

To our health!

[IKFFChannel]

Great stuff Will-keep them coming. Thanks!

[ginnydex]

Hi Will, This was a great video. You sure are a great presenter. I wish you would go to colleges and be a visiting lecturer. You have a lot of good things to say and an easy way of presenting. We need our young to hear from you and I really think they would listen:-)