Did you use Apple Lossless Encoding (ALE) or AIFF? If you used just ALE, then try the same test with AIFF. ALE isn't fully uncompressed (it's called a "lossy" format. Not quite fully lossless).
Yes the dac is all that it matters & that's why i use the digital output from the itransport to get the digital signal from the ipod (bypassing ipod's int. dac ) & straight onto my mark 30.5 dac.
hi there, thanks for the suggestions, a major upgrade for this setup is to be expected soon. Am looking for a new poweramp & a better digital processor.
Thx for the interest,the dac used in this video is a Mark Levinson No.30.5 digital processor, considered to be a reference class dac by most, costs just over £10,000.
The purpose of this test by having it hooked up to the wadia itransport is to test how good of a digital transport the wadia really was, but unfortunately it was no match to the No.31.5 it was competing against (costing £9,000 btw), so i don't think anyone should worry, because it was beaten by the best!
very bright ,,not the system ,, its jut's the crap music
twochaudio 1 year ago
Which loudspeakers and amplification are being used?
ngarmpis 2 years ago
I agree AIF should be used in this test or at least WAV as the Wadia can decode it to the full!
LordGeorgeRodney 2 years ago
Did you use Apple Lossless Encoding (ALE) or AIFF? If you used just ALE, then try the same test with AIFF. ALE isn't fully uncompressed (it's called a "lossy" format. Not quite fully lossless).
falkenlaser 2 years ago
I think AIFF is the best to use on Apple classic
I used this on my Wadia & a tube DAC & I think it is better format sound wise.
LordGeorgeRodney 2 years ago
Hey, can anyone pls tell me what song this is?@ rolfruit: impressive setup
vendetta22119 2 years ago
Putting the WADIA to the test with the MLevinson only proves its huge qualities for a low budget price!
xanaduofcorse 2 years ago
you need to extract with EAC software with a plextor cd drive and choose the wav instead if lossless this wiil probably take the competitors closer
bzaster7 2 years ago
Why so idiot?
When using the ipod the DAC in the ipod/reciever does the conversion and when using a CDP the DAC in the CDP is doing the conversion.
Of course the CD will be better...
When the source is digital the only thing that matters is the DAC.
Rayder123 2 years ago
Yes the dac is all that it matters & that's why i use the digital output from the itransport to get the digital signal from the ipod (bypassing ipod's int. dac ) & straight onto my mark 30.5 dac.
rolfruit 2 years ago
hi there, thanks for the suggestions, a major upgrade for this setup is to be expected soon. Am looking for a new poweramp & a better digital processor.
rolfruit 2 years ago
All the money spent on audio equipment is waisted if your listening room is not treated with acoustic panels and diffusers
a1aztec 2 years ago
I would like to think so, that is if you pair the wadia with a decent dac (such as the Chord dac64, Theta Pro Basic III, etc).
I do have a demo video of the wadia itransport + dac64 uploaded you should check it out.
rolfruit 3 years ago
Thx for the interest,the dac used in this video is a Mark Levinson No.30.5 digital processor, considered to be a reference class dac by most, costs just over £10,000.
The purpose of this test by having it hooked up to the wadia itransport is to test how good of a digital transport the wadia really was, but unfortunately it was no match to the No.31.5 it was competing against (costing £9,000 btw), so i don't think anyone should worry, because it was beaten by the best!
rolfruit 3 years ago
Perhaps next time i'll put up tests between the itransport and a sub £2,000 cd transport, & see which one comes out top!
rolfruit 3 years ago