Hair of the Dog: Newt's Up, Cain's Out and Donald Trump Is Back

[zvi303]

I think Paul has one problem that is not his fault, and that is that he seems to be channeling Ross Perot, much as Perry, through no fault of his own, seem to be channeling W.

That is not to say that his views make sense.

[zvi303]

Dear Paul-bots:

Does the word monomania mean anything to you? It seems if PJTV doesn't back your guy, there's no point. How about fanaticism? No-one is allowed to hold a contrary opinion. You remind me of Randians. Or any other sort fo religious fanatic.

That's the main reason we jump on your guy, because your intolerant obsession is so unnerving.

[zvi303]

@CommonRaven And yet you get 24 likes, and I get none. :-)

[bnjones28]

"does it change how the president looks... Yep, he will talk about how the numbers are looking better.

[ZombieX13]

lol typical PJ fashion they ignore the real front runner. Their boy, Cain failed so now it's all a big joke just like them.

[zvi303]

@ZombieX13 You mena Gingrich, I presume. Or Romney.

I can't wait for New Hampshire.

[doubledutch6rudder]

He said he would run as an independent if the right candidate doesn't win the primary

[Drake3209]

Wow the format has changed a bit and I like it, well done.

[elricmlbone]

The reason I stopped my subscription to PJ either no mention of Dr. Paul or they slam him.

[prac2]

No mention of Ron Paul? Why is everyone scared of Ron Paul?

[StatelessEuphoria]

RON PAUL

[thejihadresistance]

@StatelessEuphoria  NO to moRON Paul!

[zvi303]

@CommonRaven You should be very happy with politics in the country right now. Look at any earlier decade; for the first time, following the constitution is a legitimate political position.

[bretlynn]

IT'S PAUL! HE'S THE ONLY GUY LEFT, DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS!? PAUL! PAUL! PAUL! shake the cobwebs out of your head and have the courage to vote or the guy who believes the FOUNDERS, like you do!

[zvi303]

@bretlynn If Paul believed the founders, he would be a social conservative. Learn some history/

[bretlynn]

@zvi303 LOL you first!

[tjttzcspplt]

@bretlynn I'm going with bretlynn on this one, dude.

[zvi303]

@tjttzcspplt You honestly think the foudners where social libertarians? Really? You know what laws they had back then?

[tjttzcspplt]

They were innovators. These ideas were in their infancy. We're such doofuses, most don't know a thing they said, or anything about them, or the background that led them to where they were. Therefore, we are doomed to getting led by the nose into oppression. We are too stupid and lazy to end up otherwise. We who know better are too few, far between and working too hard to pay the bills to do much about it. Our kids don't want to deal with it, so lose it in video games.

[1manwalkingfreakshow]

Hey, normally I wouldn't care for Trump. But anybody who'd send an ineffective RINO politico into a post-apocalypse arena via rocket cage can't be ALL bad.

[greenfive]

the guy hosting this video is so annoying

[nottinmatterz2day]

Need Ron Paul in this title ;)

[NAGGERNUTZ]

It's gonna get very ugly until the election. Democrats have nothing to run on, so look out for the smears, filth and thug politics.

[tiggstah]

we don't like Romney because we don't need another moderate democrat on the republican ticket.

[tiggstah]

Newt's Up, Cain's Out, Donald Trump Is Back and everyone continues to obstinately ignore Ron Paul.

i'm so sick of hearing "electability" when Ron Paul would carry most of the republican vote and a good percentage of the democrat vote because Paul is on the side of the social issues that caused people to flee the republican party.

[tjttzcspplt]

@tiggstah Ron Paul is living on another planet.

[tiggstah]

@tjttzcspplt Everything that Ron Paul says is backed up by logic and sanity. Saying he is "living on another planet" is completely devoid of both. try again.

[zvi303]

@tiggstah You're right. He's living in another dimension, where his sort of "logic" works. His foreign policy is based on the same logic as Barack Obama's. His social policy is based on lies. And he seems less concerned about economic policy than the other stuff.

[tiggstah]

@zvi303 how do you manage to tie your shoes every morning?

i'm not in full accord with him on foreign policy but as for the rest... you're not just drinking the cool-aid, your mixing in some hennessy.

[zvi303]

@tiggstah Actually, I leave them tied the night before. Saves time. :-)

You are claiming the founders were not social conservatives? Really?

P.S. After Hilary's latest speech, I am willing to vote for Paul over Obama, in the unlikely that wins the primary. But in the long run if we have a succession of people like him, the world will fall to pieces and the US will eventually fall also. Neville Chaimberlain all over again.

He also seem to be chanelliing Ross Perot - not his fault.

[tiggstah]

@zvi303 they were, it's just that the stances back then and right now are different things all-together. and let's not forget the point that the founders never intended for us to engage in the military interventionism that seems to be the "conservative" stance now. you will find that the constitutional libertarianism mirrors exactly that of the founders intent. the republicans have tried to adjudicate morality while the democrats have become socialists. neither which the founders wanted.

[tjttzcspplt]

He called our troops killers. He doesn't believe our enemies in the Middle East have the willpower to make war with us and our allies (in spite of them doing it as we speak). He is more concerned about whacky weed distribution than any other social issue. He's an overgrown pacifist right-wing hippie. And his followers are a little "off" too. Some are a lot off. Nothing to do but troll around on You Tube all day. Very concerning.

[tiggstah]

@tjttzcspplt as i have said, i don't agree with him on some of his foreign policy. i dobt however he would be able to, or want to (after he has military intel after becoming president) to make drastic changes that could be a threat to our national security. and he is concerned with national security.

please provide a link to him calling us (i'm retired military) killers. oh, and in-context please.

[tjttzcspplt]

It is common knowledge. He is on You Tube video saying it. You should know the man you are in love with. He is not just naive, like Herman is. He is a pacifist, which is an entirely different thing, and is irrational at the outset. He has preconceived notions that he refuses to budge on. That's dangerous. He would be better than Obama, but, Newt, for all his crap, will at least consider something carefully, weigh the options. Not perfect, but, knowledgeable and seasoned. It's scary stuff.

[tiggstah]

@tjttzcspplt yeah, i decided to look up that "common knowledge." couldn't find it.

apparently the only place it's common knowledge is in the fantasies of idiots. perhaps you should do some actual research before making stupid statements.

[tjttzcspplt]

Gee what a surprise. Denial. I know what I saw, your freaked out blind faith notwithstanding. And gee, what a surprise. You resort to acting like a child and calling me names. As if I didn't know it was coming. Go away, you are not worth talking to.

[tiggstah]

@tjttzcspplt denial? i looked for the clip, or any record of him equating u.s. soldiers as nothing but killers. i'm telling you it doesn't exist. look for it, you won't find it. you are the one in denial and having blind faith. i did some research to validate your claim.

dr paul served proudly in the military service, so for you to submit, without any form of proof, that he called military servicemen "killers" is idiotic at best.

[tjttzcspplt]

It is like finding a needle in a haystack. The fact is, I saw him say that, and he has been my enemy since. I am sure he has backed off from it. It was around that time they were getting that green beret soldier. He was being prosecuted for killing a terrorist "in cold blood" (I say GOOD SHOT!) Either way, you can't deny R.P.'s a pacifist which disqualifies him immediately. Pacificsm is extreme denial. It is not a good thing good for our Commander-in-Chief to be. It is irrational.

[tiggstah]

@tjttzcspplt "needle in a haystack" you won't find it 'cause he never said it. you may have heard an out-of-context clip from some liberal jackass.

dr paul is most certainly not a pacifist. he believes in a strong national defense. he just believes that the military interventionism we engage in, especially in the middle east, is not necessary for our national defense but in fact works against us by gaining us more enemies. on a base level i agree with him but not specifics.

[tjttzcspplt]

No, lackey tiggstah, I heard it from the horse's mouth, and you know it. A pacifist does not see reality. He is blinded by his idealism. R.P. does not speak intelligently on this issue. These people attacked us in an act of war. They actively seek our demise. We already looked the other way in the 80s, and 90s, and we paid for lack of leadership. He is not fit for office. The end result may be the same, but, only a fool would continue to pretend we're not at war with these people.

[tiggstah]

@tjttzcspplt you've never heard it "from the horse's mouth" (at least not in context at any rate) because he's never said it. if you want to keep believing he did without any evidence go right ahead. do you still believe in the tooth fairy too? i don't need to prove he didn't because a negative is impossible to prove.

and for god sake's he's not a pacifist. he's just anti-interventionist when it doesn't serve the national defense.grow a brain guy, stop living in the black and white

[tiggstah]

@tjttzcspplt what you believe about ron paul is what you have been fed by the liberals who don't want his fiscal policies and the mainstream neo-con republicans who are dependent upon the military industrial complex.

but it is not true.

he is not a pacifist, he believes in the laws upon which we were founded.

he is not an isolationist, he just doesn't believe that we should go sticking our nose into everyone else's business like a bully.

[tjttzcspplt]

Go away, I'm tired of this ridiculous conversation. You are completely disengaged with the reality of the situation. Don't reply.

[tiggstah]

@tjttzcspplt it's really funny that you think i am totally disengaged from reality.

thinking that someone who is not completely behind the military industrial complex is automatically a pacifist is a strawman argument that falls apart in any other reality other than the fantasy you have in your own head.

if you can't see at least some of the logic behind dr paul's argument that our interventionism actually gains us enemies then it is your mind that is fractured.

don't reply? lol

[tjttzcspplt]

Look, you've proved your immaturity with your childish insults to ppl already. That is established. No one is making a blanket statement about your "military industrial complex" conspiracy theories. The point is that this man does not demonstrate the rational thought required, but, rather, his own idea re how things shld go, regardless of facts or changes. He is not fit for the job, sorry. Insult me (somewhere else) all you want. That's the reality of the situation. Like it or not.

[tiggstah]

@tjttzcspplt the man exudes nothing but rational thought.

i thought you wanted this conversation to end. perhaps though it took you a few days to try and come up with a retort when you came to know every point you were making was wrong.

so now you just try to say "you're being childish and dr paul is stupid?" really?

what color is the sky in your 5th grade planet?

whatever dude, i am rubber and you are glue....

[kevlarunderware]

All I wan't for Christmas is a Ron Paul nomination

[DiNatalli]

RONPAUL ALL THE WAY.

[rdhayes06]

You know who opted out of the circus the Donald is hosting? Ron Paul.

[CountArtha]

@rdhayes06 Huntsman excused himself too. I believe he used the phrase "reality show." :P

[Mezey5]

@rdhayes06 Yeah, i really like John Huntsman but he isn't that popular.

[MrFreeLibertarian]

@rdhayes06 Great!  Now we don't have to hear how America is the problem in the world!