What u r claiming is BS I notice you don't show how much power is being consumed and you also don't show how much is being generated and that is because you are putting in more than your getting out anyone that thinks anything of this is an idiot!
Everyone keeps talking about "free energy." You want free energy? Get a solar cell. The Sun gives out more energy per second that anyone on Earth can use in a very long time! And it'll be there for 5 billion more years!
@npsit1 Yes, the way I've been reading it for over 50 years, in just 10 minutes, enough sunlight falls on the earth to power everything for a year, if only we could actually harvest it? The amount is estimated to be around 1KW per square meter.
ok what are you using as the generator to make power? Too what are these connected too? Then what type off power do they are converted from too make Dc or Ac house current?
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be a part of the energy revolution!
@eddie7478852 Tha is one very dumb statement. Belts or gears would have contact and a loss resulting from that physical contact. Hre there is no contact between the rotors, and magnets, working in attraction mode, are actualy reducing the motors' own internal magnetic resistance. That could explain why there may actually be some overunity. And note that I am not saying there IS any, I am saying there MAY be. With belts and gear there CANNOT be any because of the loss through the friciton.
@moniquitus1, I believe you may be wrong in calling it a "dumb" statement. The input that is delivered to keep this magnetic gear set-up in motion will probably equal the friction losses if a gear train or belt pulley system is used. Just as you state, " That could explain why there may actually be some overunity. And note that I am not saying there IS any, I am saying there MAY be." I am saying there MAY not be. All things are up for revision in my dumb mind making dumb statements.
@eddie7478852 I am simply saying that where there is no friction caused by physical contact, the loss of energy is lower. That is why magnetic bearing is so much more efficient than ball bearing. Whether overunity can be achieved by this set up is another thing. Overunity exists, for example in nuclear process, where we input just a little of the energy to produce a lot. That is overunity in anyone's book. So, it does exist. And there may be better ways to create it than nuclear energy.
@moniquitus1 I want this to happen, I believe it can be done. I am working on my own and state opinions because of my desire to use no input initially. That is probably why I am biased. Peace and Love.
Hello. I would have given you 5 stars but there's no explaination of what it can do (output vs input, etc.) or anything about how it's really supposed to work or the dynamics of how it's powered.
Has anything more happened since this video was posted?
What u r claiming is BS I notice you don't show how much power is being consumed and you also don't show how much is being generated and that is because you are putting in more than your getting out anyone that thinks anything of this is an idiot!
KiloEchoDelta 21 hours ago
If this can amke free energy, where is the confirmation by repeating the experiment ?
where is the witnesses ?
where are the plans?
why not make many of these and spread/sell them to the public/universities?
superdiza 1 month ago
Everyone keeps talking about "free energy." You want free energy? Get a solar cell. The Sun gives out more energy per second that anyone on Earth can use in a very long time! And it'll be there for 5 billion more years!
npsit1 1 month ago
@npsit1 Yes, the way I've been reading it for over 50 years, in just 10 minutes, enough sunlight falls on the earth to power everything for a year, if only we could actually harvest it? The amount is estimated to be around 1KW per square meter.
dougspair 3 weeks ago
fucking moron.
it's a miracle that there are such ignorant
lionogre 3 months ago
Nice,got a few vids out myself on such.
stevensrd1 3 months ago
ok what are you using as the generator to make power? Too what are these connected too? Then what type off power do they are converted from too make Dc or Ac house current?
Mrinfoone 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be a part of the energy revolution!
rebelliouseoagj 1 year ago
Get the same result from belts or gears.
eddie7478852 1 year ago
@eddie7478852 Tha is one very dumb statement. Belts or gears would have contact and a loss resulting from that physical contact. Hre there is no contact between the rotors, and magnets, working in attraction mode, are actualy reducing the motors' own internal magnetic resistance. That could explain why there may actually be some overunity. And note that I am not saying there IS any, I am saying there MAY be. With belts and gear there CANNOT be any because of the loss through the friciton.
moniquitus1 1 year ago
@moniquitus1, I believe you may be wrong in calling it a "dumb" statement. The input that is delivered to keep this magnetic gear set-up in motion will probably equal the friction losses if a gear train or belt pulley system is used. Just as you state, " That could explain why there may actually be some overunity. And note that I am not saying there IS any, I am saying there MAY be." I am saying there MAY not be. All things are up for revision in my dumb mind making dumb statements.
eddie7478852 1 year ago
@eddie7478852 I am simply saying that where there is no friction caused by physical contact, the loss of energy is lower. That is why magnetic bearing is so much more efficient than ball bearing. Whether overunity can be achieved by this set up is another thing. Overunity exists, for example in nuclear process, where we input just a little of the energy to produce a lot. That is overunity in anyone's book. So, it does exist. And there may be better ways to create it than nuclear energy.
moniquitus1 1 year ago
@moniquitus1 I want this to happen, I believe it can be done. I am working on my own and state opinions because of my desire to use no input initially. That is probably why I am biased. Peace and Love.
Sincerely,
The dummy
eddie7478852 1 year ago
@eddie7478852 imagine this with Free Energy Step by Step Instructions Part 2 or Free Energy " One of a Kind Device " or those on a romerouk ?
bearpatch626 9 months ago
Hello. I would have given you 5 stars but there's no explaination of what it can do (output vs input, etc.) or anything about how it's really supposed to work or the dynamics of how it's powered.
Has anything more happened since this video was posted?
Thanks for your efforts, though, and good luck!
seanmcgu 2 years ago