I like how in this one, the body rejects the woman getting pregnant, and wjhen science forces her pregnant, the baby has a genetic disease. alsmost as if the body is smart enough to tell a bitch shes not having a baby because it will be born fucked up.
perhaps one gene = one generation...like rings in trees...
each ring tells us the climate of the year it grew.. each individual gene represents an ancestor...a track record of their life and the diseases they had can be there ..or not..
now we need to know how old the human species is...
30 000 genes=30 000 years?
if so cucumbers have been around longer than we have!
It's not rocket science that people shouldn't be using so much artificial bullshit, particularly when children are involved. This just in: it appears that messing with natural processes seems to fuck people up. So, yeah...good job, science. Just keep up that stupid shit and watch the birth defects and insanity spiral completely out of control. Sadly, people tend to be healthier when they stay the fuck away from doctors for a reason. Stay away from these experiementers, I say.
@EvilsOfFeminism hmm well my brother goes to the doctors ALL the time and he gets sick ALOT, but I don't go often and I don't get sick often. So yeah, that may be true.
@Andre2Dayle being 7 doesn't make you stupid. I think though that this video might be a bit grown up for you. You don't need to worry about genes and things for a few years yet.
@uknowispeaksense But why not watch videos that are complicated even if people don't understand the video. Why not try to understand and learn from the video, the more people watch videos like these, the more educated they become and the more smarter they will be even if people don't understand, they will still learn from the video. If people watch simple things, their mind may always think simple, etc...
@Titusaki dude, he is 7. he has plenty of time to learn complicated things. at 7 all he should worry about is being a kid. When you've got kids of your own you will understand.
@uknowispeaksense Yeah I know, but if he wants to know, then why not give him the answer because he seems interested in learning. If he wanted to be a kid then he can, though he can be a kid while he wants to learn about the things he wants to know. So if he wants to learn complicated things while being a kid, it should be ok.
@Andre2Dayle a gene is, technically, "a specific location on the chromosome that holds the code for a protein." Genes are what control how you look, and how your body functions. It's a segment of DNA. Alleles are the types of genes that you can have. For example, you have a gene that controls your eye color. One allele will make your eyes blue, another will make them green. Depending on which allele you have and which is dominant, your eyes will be that color.
Maybe these guys should practice some computer programming aside of genetic and bio things because the two areas are obviously show more and more similarities as we look deeper.
Crude though it was, Lamarck was essentially correct, not unlike Darwin. My twist: keep hacking away the ONE arm, of a family of humans and after a couple thousand generations and what the good professor called GENOMIC IMPRINTING, slowly taking place in both the BRAIN and the genes themselves, will dictate that that arm (of THAT genetic FAMILY all of whose off spring's ONE arm is always hacked away immediately after birth) be reduced, from the embryo phases onward and, ultimately, NOT grown!
I, for some totally perverse reason, have always thought Lamarck (laughed at & ridiculed), HAD SOMETHING going on, when he made his crude hypothesis about the animals who ACQUIRED Superior Qualities Passes them to their Offpring. It's obvious neither Lamarck nor Darwin --- and for that matter, neither did the great Mandel, who worked on the MATHEMATICAL probability of inheritance --- knew any thing about chromosome structures, specific genes, or the multiple roles each gene plays....
I'm rolling my eyes at the naivity of some commenters -but then again, this IS youtube. Epigenetics is a field that is relatively young but rapidly growing -this isn't some BIG secret and the data supporting its hypotheses goes back many years and its published for anyone to see. I guess I forget that some fruit pies find consipiracy theory more sexy than taking Genetics 101 or reading a scientific journal.
Anthropologists have been teaching this in biology classes for quite some time. I wish that the sciences would communicate more readily. Of course anthropology and paleontology are two of the sciences that have been attempting this since at least the 1970's.
Just-Cause 2 gameplay beats any kind of game on the market at the moment! Their own physics essentially makes the game greater than just about any other. From flying helicoptors, to driving around in vehicles, it's simply just stunning. If you would like to experiment with it for no cost, head over to JC2DownloadXcom (replace X with . ).
So there are some parts of genetics we don't understand, then the whole theory of genetics must be false? This is lamarckism, lets not hope it leads to the same catastrophies as it did in the soviet...
The conversations in the comments on this video are essentially just like the ones you always hear on a crowded bus.
How in the...hell is one generation equal to one year? HOW?!
Alternatevil 1 month ago
I like how in this one, the body rejects the woman getting pregnant, and wjhen science forces her pregnant, the baby has a genetic disease. alsmost as if the body is smart enough to tell a bitch shes not having a baby because it will be born fucked up.
MrJohnny56789 2 months ago
perhaps one gene = one generation...like rings in trees...
each ring tells us the climate of the year it grew.. each individual gene represents an ancestor...a track record of their life and the diseases they had can be there ..or not..
now we need to know how old the human species is...
30 000 genes=30 000 years?
if so cucumbers have been around longer than we have!
metamaggot 3 months ago
@metamaggot hmm not quite..it seems man left africa 200 000 years ago and became really modern abou 50 000 years ago...
if there's 25 000 genes it could be 2 generations= 1 gene
metamaggot 3 months ago
It's not rocket science that people shouldn't be using so much artificial bullshit, particularly when children are involved. This just in: it appears that messing with natural processes seems to fuck people up. So, yeah...good job, science. Just keep up that stupid shit and watch the birth defects and insanity spiral completely out of control. Sadly, people tend to be healthier when they stay the fuck away from doctors for a reason. Stay away from these experiementers, I say.
EvilsOfFeminism 5 months ago
@EvilsOfFeminism hmm well my brother goes to the doctors ALL the time and he gets sick ALOT, but I don't go often and I don't get sick often. So yeah, that may be true.
Titusaki 1 month ago
I got my huge balls from my great grandfather. Thanks Great Gramps!
Gravitymann 10 months ago
@Gravitymann I know
DUNKDAEXCESS 9 months ago
Comment removed
KenMacMillan 11 months ago
what Exacley is a gene?....yes i'm stupid :) explain as i'm 7years
Andre2Dayle 11 months ago
@Andre2Dayle being 7 doesn't make you stupid. I think though that this video might be a bit grown up for you. You don't need to worry about genes and things for a few years yet.
uknowispeaksense 11 months ago
@uknowispeaksense But why not watch videos that are complicated even if people don't understand the video. Why not try to understand and learn from the video, the more people watch videos like these, the more educated they become and the more smarter they will be even if people don't understand, they will still learn from the video. If people watch simple things, their mind may always think simple, etc...
Titusaki 1 month ago
@Titusaki dude, he is 7. he has plenty of time to learn complicated things. at 7 all he should worry about is being a kid. When you've got kids of your own you will understand.
uknowispeaksense 1 month ago
@uknowispeaksense Yeah I know, but if he wants to know, then why not give him the answer because he seems interested in learning. If he wanted to be a kid then he can, though he can be a kid while he wants to learn about the things he wants to know. So if he wants to learn complicated things while being a kid, it should be ok.
Titusaki 1 month ago
@Andre2Dayle a gene is, technically, "a specific location on the chromosome that holds the code for a protein." Genes are what control how you look, and how your body functions. It's a segment of DNA. Alleles are the types of genes that you can have. For example, you have a gene that controls your eye color. One allele will make your eyes blue, another will make them green. Depending on which allele you have and which is dominant, your eyes will be that color.
greeneyedgracie 10 months ago 2
I thought inheritance is only possible in C++
sumittechkgp 1 year ago
@sumittechkgp its also possible in Java and others. Just saying.
listen2watidontsay 1 year ago
Comment removed
krstcmjns 1 year ago
Comment removed
ferdiboy22 1 year ago
Maybe these guys should practice some computer programming aside of genetic and bio things because the two areas are obviously show more and more similarities as we look deeper.
molekulaTV 1 year ago
@rachelphoebelizzie You would be really fucked
Gajoobles 1 year ago
The scientist at 5.40 looks just like Life on Mars actor John Simm.
Aireysghost1 1 year ago
Crude though it was, Lamarck was essentially correct, not unlike Darwin. My twist: keep hacking away the ONE arm, of a family of humans and after a couple thousand generations and what the good professor called GENOMIC IMPRINTING, slowly taking place in both the BRAIN and the genes themselves, will dictate that that arm (of THAT genetic FAMILY all of whose off spring's ONE arm is always hacked away immediately after birth) be reduced, from the embryo phases onward and, ultimately, NOT grown!
HenryDavidT 1 year ago
I, for some totally perverse reason, have always thought Lamarck (laughed at & ridiculed), HAD SOMETHING going on, when he made his crude hypothesis about the animals who ACQUIRED Superior Qualities Passes them to their Offpring. It's obvious neither Lamarck nor Darwin --- and for that matter, neither did the great Mandel, who worked on the MATHEMATICAL probability of inheritance --- knew any thing about chromosome structures, specific genes, or the multiple roles each gene plays....
HenryDavidT 1 year ago
I'm rolling my eyes at the naivity of some commenters -but then again, this IS youtube. Epigenetics is a field that is relatively young but rapidly growing -this isn't some BIG secret and the data supporting its hypotheses goes back many years and its published for anyone to see. I guess I forget that some fruit pies find consipiracy theory more sexy than taking Genetics 101 or reading a scientific journal.
phoenixicarus 1 year ago 26
Anthropologists have been teaching this in biology classes for quite some time. I wish that the sciences would communicate more readily. Of course anthropology and paleontology are two of the sciences that have been attempting this since at least the 1970's.
kgilster18 1 year ago
I have my degree in biology from UT and find this interesting.
phatcrayonz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just-Cause 2 gameplay beats any kind of game on the market at the moment! Their own physics essentially makes the game greater than just about any other. From flying helicoptors, to driving around in vehicles, it's simply just stunning. If you would like to experiment with it for no cost, head over to JC2DownloadXcom (replace X with . ).
judesanford281428 1 year ago
there are so few comments ,because nobody understands
georgel19841 1 year ago
@georgel19841 slash no one watches this (eg a singing cat will get 6mil views)
sippy07 1 year ago
@sippy07 she got talent
georgel19841 1 year ago
@sippy07
Wait, what, there's a singing cat on YouTube? *closes video* *searches for singing cat*
But in all seriousness, yes. I weep in despair over the dimness of the human race.
d3st88 11 months ago
This is very important to study.
RJL738 1 year ago
This was on Kant work, he said and described this as "A Priori" experience.
johnthedragon928082 2 years ago
So there are some parts of genetics we don't understand, then the whole theory of genetics must be false? This is lamarckism, lets not hope it leads to the same catastrophies as it did in the soviet...
Ghilliefied 2 years ago