Darn, could have recorded some civil war battles. 1860-65 (guns shots in the backround) "Tell my great great grandkids that I love em, i'm going to antetum right now, got mr. Lincoln at might side here, relaxing and smoking his pipe."
Just imagine little bighorn 1876 Custer: "got my trusty winchester rifle, she'll see me through, wait, I reckon something's not quite right here"(shouts/warcries of lacota and rifle blasts can be heard)
I suspect it was impossible to hear the original recording. It was justa record of sound waves. Edison no doubt heard or these experiments & came up w/ a way to play back the sound which is recorded. Edison had to "recreate" his recording b/c his original method recorded on tin foil & it was detroyed on removal from the phonograph cylender.
eymeng, the first part is the paper recording from Leon Scott de Martinville and is from "Au claire de la Lune" the second part with the singing is a more modern piece so you can hear what it is suppose to sound like. The original Leon Scott recording was just lampblack on papar. Leon Scott was doing work on soundwaves at the time and made his machine was called a Phonautograph.The last part "Mary had a Little Lamp" is a recreation done by Edison of his first recording. I hope this helps out.
I am fascinated by the history of recording. I love hearing old recordings and marveling that they were done so long ago! No words to capture the awe I feel, though. None.
The singing at first is very wavy and distorted. Then there's a woman singing with a guitar? behind her. It sounds far too clear to be an 1870s recording. THen there's the familiar poetry reciting. Where did this 1860 recording come from? It's a piece of history, and it intrigues me.
why is everyone only commenting on the first 47 seconds? Why doesn't the description have more info? Am I hearing singing and poetry that no one else is??
I mean what did it really sound like when new, before degrading over the many years? Could that ever possibly be restored and heard again? And were there even earlier recordings that may or may not exist today, but have yet to be discovered? Or, if there are such things, are they forever lost as well? If so, that last makes me sad.
It is a good thing to record, and to keep such recordings completely preserved forever losing nothing, if it could ever be possible to do so.
The 1877 recording sounds exponentially clearer than the 17-year-older recording.
At least it sounds that way today. Perhaps it is possible that 1860 recording once sounded much better than it does now but maybe has not been as well-preserved as the greater-known Edison recording.
Wow! The thought of such technology boggles the mind! But is also a sad thought, making one wonder about what is now forever lost in antiquity.
I don't know what you guys are so scared of, I actually find it pretty aspiring that someone could actually figure out a way to record with a oil container, although I find it creepy that you are actually listening to a ghost...
It doesn't beat Edison! Stop putting this non-historical bunk on here. The recording was made into paper and was never played back until recently when computers took the ink tracing and made sound out of it. Edison invented a machine that PLAYED BACK the recordings. This 1860 machine didn't play anything back.
Okay! For all of you who think it's a woman singing that little French piece, it's actually a guy. The reason it sounds like a woman is because it's faster than it should be. Look this up on Wikipedia and you'll find out it's a man.
sound like a fucking creepy EVP for ghost hunting lol ^^ in fact if this french inventor used wax like edison and not paper, he could be the first inventor of phonograph.
This is scary. No doubt about it. Who agrees looking at old things. Or pictures or anything for that matter you get goose bumps and think these people don't look right. I mean you can't tell me people in the 15 hundreths look like ghosts or corpses 0_0 everyone then were satanic....
Don't be ridiculous - it's not in the least "scary", "creepy" or "freaky". What IS scary is the technology of changing voices so that singers can "sing" songs that weren't even written when they were alive.
This is absolutely fascinating and a worthy piece of history. Thank you for posting it here.
@tinpanalley67 It is true. Go to tinfoil dot com. They have a ton of recordings. Including the experimental talking clock. Frank Lambert created it. If you'd do the research you would know it..
I've read that Edison may have taken credit for other people's inventions, but this is the first I've heard of him conspiring to murder. Could you be specific? If it's too time-consuming to respond, could you please post a link to this information? I hope it's not true, but I will look at any evidence objectively.
why scary? We also know Lennon or Cobain are dead, however I don't see anything scary about them except whether you think their music sucks. This is simply astounding and wonderful, kinda like The Twilight Zone.
The people who first played this Phonautograph recording now have done more research and discovered they played the recording twice the intended speed. The voice is a man, actually it is Leon Scott himself. The Edison recording is from a film soundtrack Aug. 12, 1927.
@OmegaWolf747 Oh, yeah! Then it would be totally "Black Sabbath" creepy. I don't know why metal bands aren't using these ancient gadgets. Just think of all the ways you could freak people out with the spooky recordings. :P
@gamesDAMNED I know that what is most frightening is when people make recording about abusing drugs & killing police officers & other deviances etc. but the "poor" sound quality of the worlds first recording of the daughter of the inventor of this device is far from frightening.
The phonautograph was invented purely as a scientific novelty to make soundwaves visible, it was not understood that the patterns made by the device were actually a recording of the sound that only needed a playback device
Man this freaked me out. especially cause I saw this at night. o__0
Pretty cool though how much everything's changed since then. Thank God too! Can you imagine how creepy it'd be if today's songs were recorded like that? *shudders*
What's up with the 2 notes playing and walkietalkie sound effect after the person saying pierrot? Or was she still singing and then the recorder stopped?
I'm sure back then the creators thought that was really some accomplishment - and it was. Can you imagine if they could come back and see where technology is today...I'm not even sure if the word (technology) was even around then.. but golly gee wiz, look how far we've come... now That's the scary part... really!!! Scotty....beam me up now!
but the thing is, that the guy who recorded it, he did'nt play it back, he did'nt even know he could, he just studied the marks her voice made on the "whateveritwas"
I think it's a bit scary...I mean, I'm sure the woman wasn't scary in real life...but just the thought of her voice coming through after 149 years, all distorted and crackly and surreal, is a bit unnerving.
@levizer Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville is a man AND he was the voice you heard in the first clip.. The second clip is just a woman singing but it WASN't him
Fascinating !
gerardbedecarter 2 days ago
How in the Hell can you dislike this without this there would be no You-Tube dimwits!
americanmonarchist 3 days ago
better than justin bieber
MrLimeandsalt 5 days ago
sounds like something you'd hear in a horror movie trailer
caspianb132 1 week ago
This is scaring me!! What was that??
M0RGaN98 1 week ago
ONE WORD CREEPY
shaneyseano 2 weeks ago
PARECE QUEJIDOS DE PELICULA DE TERROR
SOYSOCRATES1 4 weeks ago
who gargles so loudly?
aayush10001 1 month ago
Lolol for some reson this is outlandishly halarious. Makes me smile real good. I can't stop laughing at the fuzzy noise xD
marurashi 1 month ago
fuck! It's the strangest thing I've ever heard, now I'm listening this and btw I'm alone at home. Yh screw you World's Oldest Recordings!
Asztonmartin 1 month ago
So fucking beautiful, Somebody kiss me before this feeling ends.
mothbits 1 month ago
Really Scary actually :S
FillionDollarSmile 1 month ago 2
so apparently, Susan Boyle was alive in 1860...
Dice3000 1 month ago 6
It sounds like Rattman from Portal
evilsmile013 1 month ago
aaannnnd why didnt they just speak into a cup and close the lid???
SendBig 1 month ago
he's singing au claire de la lune
BurtGoaler 1 month ago
Kinda creepy. I love it
Demendred1605 1 month ago
If edison knew he was inventing such a shitty sounding phonograph, then why the hell are we so stupid?!
jackwolf131 1 month ago
kinda creepy..
LuvMyBirdies 1 month ago
I prefer DVD
martinvoet 1 month ago
I wasn't going to sleep tonight anyways
WMGsuck 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What's the name of the song??
Dantesierra 1 month ago
sounds like a elephant farting
bobalegokid123 2 months ago
@bobalegokid123 true but I have 1 question, why must you call your mom an ELEPHANT
StandUPcomedyGENIUS 1 month ago
@StandUPcomedyGENIUS listen i was just saying thats what its sounds like and i really dont like when peoplemake fun of my mom
bobalegokid123 1 month ago
@bobalegokid123 Don`t worry it didn`t make sense anyway
Honkanen89 1 month ago
Au clair de la la lune, mon amour j'ai perdu ! Les paroles ne sont pas tout à fait les mêmes que dans la chanson.
pleoj 2 months ago
What happens if you play this backwards?
jonathankeighty 2 months ago
@jonathankeighty
Well, I can't understand shit so, I think nothing
WMGsuck 1 month ago
whats it saying?
hitlersucks101 2 months ago
Its still better than todays music
xxBaMaBeAsTxx 2 months ago 6
@xxBaMaBeAsTxx You have not heard Morton Subotnick, I presume? :-)
MushroomedAnymore 2 months ago
@MushroomedAnymore Who?
Skulldetta 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Skulldetta Copy and Paste this into the YouTube Search Engine: Morton Subotnick, Key To Songs and you you will see what I mean. :-)
MushroomedAnymore 2 months ago
@xxBaMaBeAsTxx Do I rap over this
pictureisup1 2 months ago
Darn, could have recorded some civil war battles. 1860-65 (guns shots in the backround) "Tell my great great grandkids that I love em, i'm going to antetum right now, got mr. Lincoln at might side here, relaxing and smoking his pipe."
Just imagine little bighorn 1876 Custer: "got my trusty winchester rifle, she'll see me through, wait, I reckon something's not quite right here"(shouts/warcries of lacota and rifle blasts can be heard)
jaymorpheus11 2 months ago
wow the beginning is hell creepy :D
xxpinkstrawberriexxx 2 months ago
I'm in awe..
bulabula51 2 months ago
wonder why it never caught on? lol
RedStateRoy 2 months ago
@lbqt123np lol. go back to listening to your ipod. And thank these guys for starting the line of inventions that led to it.
wdr217 2 months ago
damn the second one aint bad.
rockyfan94 2 months ago
@rockyfan94 Yeah i know i thought all of these are just gonna sound like buzzes
JPhil151 2 months ago
@lbqt123np Yah think? i dont think they had HD phonograms back then. just sayin.
xNoTriggerx 3 months ago
The first part was kinda.. ehm.. I'm not going to sleep tonight, anyway.
henrik174 3 months ago
au claire de la lune are a song in french,i speak french, AND I CAN EAR THE LYRIC!
wow! this sound very low,but,i can understand what she say!
mat5637 3 months ago 2
The 1877 one isn't bad.
lordmahan11 3 months ago
4 million wasps in a fight
misanthropicagenda1 3 months ago 18
@lbqt123np It was recorded 150 years ago, what did you expect?
Corvastus 3 months ago
They used to record with Patatoes, try this at home
7Enzoo 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
0:46-1:12 that song could not've been fromm 1877.
67nairb 3 months ago
Doesn't it sound like a pigeon?
PotatoHoly 3 months ago
Is it itrue that the voice recording was that of a guy? not female?
battou66488 3 months ago
I suspect it was impossible to hear the original recording. It was justa record of sound waves. Edison no doubt heard or these experiments & came up w/ a way to play back the sound which is recorded. Edison had to "recreate" his recording b/c his original method recorded on tin foil & it was detroyed on removal from the phonograph cylender.
VictorLepanto 3 months ago
@VictorLepanto no,this singer speak in french this is why you cant understanding what she say....
mat5637 3 months ago
@mat5637: I doubt anyone heard this until it was transferred to some other medium. It was just lines drawn in carbon on a cylender.
VictorLepanto 3 months ago
eymeng, the first part is the paper recording from Leon Scott de Martinville and is from "Au claire de la Lune" the second part with the singing is a more modern piece so you can hear what it is suppose to sound like. The original Leon Scott recording was just lampblack on papar. Leon Scott was doing work on soundwaves at the time and made his machine was called a Phonautograph.The last part "Mary had a Little Lamp" is a recreation done by Edison of his first recording. I hope this helps out.
ThePookybear 3 months ago
@ThePookybear Thanks for the info! I wonder why the owner didn't post this in the description.
TwinMillMC 3 months ago
I am fascinated by the history of recording. I love hearing old recordings and marveling that they were done so long ago! No words to capture the awe I feel, though. None.
LostJedi26 4 months ago
The singing at first is very wavy and distorted. Then there's a woman singing with a guitar? behind her. It sounds far too clear to be an 1870s recording. THen there's the familiar poetry reciting. Where did this 1860 recording come from? It's a piece of history, and it intrigues me.
LostJedi26 4 months ago
why is everyone only commenting on the first 47 seconds? Why doesn't the description have more info? Am I hearing singing and poetry that no one else is??
EyMeng 4 months ago
sounds like my cat with a hairball
QuikdrawlMcgraw 4 months ago
[...continued, last]
I mean what did it really sound like when new, before degrading over the many years? Could that ever possibly be restored and heard again? And were there even earlier recordings that may or may not exist today, but have yet to be discovered? Or, if there are such things, are they forever lost as well? If so, that last makes me sad.
It is a good thing to record, and to keep such recordings completely preserved forever losing nothing, if it could ever be possible to do so.
WinstonSmith6079 5 months ago
The 1877 recording sounds exponentially clearer than the 17-year-older recording.
At least it sounds that way today. Perhaps it is possible that 1860 recording once sounded much better than it does now but maybe has not been as well-preserved as the greater-known Edison recording.
Wow! The thought of such technology boggles the mind! But is also a sad thought, making one wonder about what is now forever lost in antiquity.
[continued, next...]
WinstonSmith6079 5 months ago
k first of all, i dont understand its sound like bee, not since 0:46
Mrpotsable 5 months ago
I don't know what you guys are so scared of, I actually find it pretty aspiring that someone could actually figure out a way to record with a oil container, although I find it creepy that you are actually listening to a ghost...
Yazunmanto77 5 months ago
i wanna hear a dubstep of this!
MichaelSarkizzian 5 months ago
a voice from the past. amazing that only her voice of her generation in 1860 would be heard again in 151 years time
crazyknight2008 5 months ago 2
This is like bad dream....
I'm scared !!!
feqfg 5 months ago
It's like a haunting from the grave...
Damn right it is, goddamit...
Svartalfgeist 5 months ago
I'm Scared :O
DAVELIGHT11 5 months ago
almost shitted on my pants with the first thing ._______.
Elxthalanx64 5 months ago
seven days...
obscurecult 5 months ago 60
@obscurecult ?
ZAUBERINSEL 2 weeks ago
What an interesting video! Thanks a lot!
SuperLuckydream 5 months ago
This should never be heard. God help us!
leftyspade 5 months ago
did they record it with a calculator?
joking!
ReBeLhIpI 5 months ago
those noises at the start (0:12) was that ment to be like what?
v1nchynoobs 5 months ago
Crappy Microphones On That Recorder They Had Back Then.
Andrea10143 6 months ago
scary as fuck
zbtunes 6 months ago
Translation: " doom is coming a evil girl is goin to be born call justin bieber be aware!
lingy010595 6 months ago 2
Scary~
sazuist 6 months ago
Comment removed
NewDisneySucksHard 6 months ago
Old television was in black and white.
Old recordings were done in wax and cylinder phonographs.
Old pictures required hours of exposure to get a proper image.
And here, we're watching YouTube on our cell phones, where we get to record our own text message ringtones and take pictures in seconds.
... What would the good old days have actually BEEN like, anyways?
BelchTycoon 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cool but a bit eerie
meatloaf928 6 months ago
there's something haunting about this :P
conorzzy 6 months ago
Well! Old and scarysounding or not it still beats a lot of the stuff made today.
Livsangel 7 months ago
It still beats a lot of the stuff made today (smiles).
Livsangel 8 months ago
it sounds eerie. this sounds like it can be an evp
GhostoftheGridiron 8 months ago
shes says, " At Claire of the Moon". thats the french translation.
XxXsitarheroXxX 8 months ago
Wiz fah woo fah et eh vooo....wiz fah woo et eh vooo
pennjersey83 8 months ago
It sounds kinda scary and yet I can´t help but listen to it.
Livsangel 8 months ago 41
Sounds scary? Yes... But how did it sound the day it was recorded?
By the pictures it looks that the recording device is practically the same principle as Edison's.
PKamargo 9 months ago
hmm the french man who recorded this,made a machine that was not suitable for playbacks that's why it sounds strange.
DeutscheRossiya 9 months ago
au clair de la lune means : under the light of the moon
psycosid666 10 months ago
so that's grand pa's I -POD
psycosid666 10 months ago
whats the name of the song at 0:58
Presidentofstormhawk 10 months ago
@Presidentofstormhawk
au claire de la lune
skwli 9 months ago
lol its like they hell rap to this in their hood, hahaha
MrmeatyJY 10 months ago
Shit thats fucking scary, I am totally going to prank someone shitless with this
horbergaren 10 months ago
wooouuuwwwwww..... so that's what saunds in hell...
Wheelrezz 10 months ago
Beautiful recording,preserving the years online,it's not creepy if you think about it,and see what we have as music now in the days
DeutscheRossiya 11 months ago 2
the second one seems to be in better condition lol
hipeeps1103 11 months ago
it sounds like elephants jizzing
doomfreezzer61 11 months ago
its in D major
pilotoatomico 11 months ago
Man, we're really come a long way from that. Still awesome to preserve this kind of things even if they are a bit creepy.
supermariosunshine64 11 months ago
sounds like its some reverb
DarkGuitarHero 11 months ago
It was the inventor's daughter who sang the 2 lines of Au Clair de la Lune so it was a child's voice. Muah-ha-ha.
94MaverickGT 1 year ago
I'd do her. Just kidding that'd be gross.
jbjindra 1 year ago
It doesn't beat Edison! Stop putting this non-historical bunk on here. The recording was made into paper and was never played back until recently when computers took the ink tracing and made sound out of it. Edison invented a machine that PLAYED BACK the recordings. This 1860 machine didn't play anything back.
hyzercreek 1 year ago
Shes French, And its really old quality so that boosts up the fail recording.
ProductionsHead 1 year ago
creepy!
Horserider4561 1 year ago
sounds a little bit like miranda cosgrove's raining sunshine
Horserider4561 1 year ago
Sounds like a ghost (first recoding), scary!
redphantom85617 1 year ago
I'm so sampling this
ScarlemD 1 year ago
how weird is it to know what thomas edison actually sounds like
TamboresDeJaykub 1 year ago
@ch1ldpr3d3t0r i gave the wrong expression.......what i meant is that this video is freaking freaky
TimeTravelerJK 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Date a naughty woman online benaughtyman.info
lachelleflockfxc 1 year ago
Okay! For all of you who think it's a woman singing that little French piece, it's actually a guy. The reason it sounds like a woman is because it's faster than it should be. Look this up on Wikipedia and you'll find out it's a man.
StormOfMaat 1 year ago
It wasn't a woman.
Eduard de Martinville's recording was played at twice the original speed
It's actually his voice.
EricBarbera 1 year ago
sound like a fucking creepy EVP for ghost hunting lol ^^ in fact if this french inventor used wax like edison and not paper, he could be the first inventor of phonograph.
Meteotrance 1 year ago
Still beats Justin Biber :)
DanceroidCPTV 1 year ago 3
Sounds like evp
SynL2010 1 year ago
Goes to show you that the europeans were demonic pagans at best. Listen to the 1877 one it's normal. But the old one is not right.
jlbroich 1 year ago
this women is dead now O__O
TimeTravelerJK 1 year ago
@TimeTravelerJK dude shes been dead for like a hundred years
ch1ldpr3d3t0r 1 year ago
This is scary. No doubt about it. Who agrees looking at old things. Or pictures or anything for that matter you get goose bumps and think these people don't look right. I mean you can't tell me people in the 15 hundreths look like ghosts or corpses 0_0 everyone then were satanic....
jlbroich 1 year ago
Don't be ridiculous - it's not in the least "scary", "creepy" or "freaky". What IS scary is the technology of changing voices so that singers can "sing" songs that weren't even written when they were alive.
This is absolutely fascinating and a worthy piece of history. Thank you for posting it here.
HerefordChris 1 year ago
O.O
That is freaking CREEPY man...
dmenkhau 1 year ago
This is no longer rare.
Kaorusempai1 1 year ago
Creepy azz hell.
Maymona13 1 year ago
I THINK I PISSED MY PANTS..................YEP I DID, AND I THINK I DROPPED A DEUCE IN THEM TOO
sweet58441 1 year ago
je crois qu'il dit : au clair de la lune, mon amour j'ai perdu...
pleoj 1 year ago
I will personally buy a case of beer for the first person who puts that creepy recording on their cell phone :P
gamesDAMNED 1 year ago 3
@gamesDAMNED
No thank you, good sir.
dxjohncenacaz 1 year ago
postiram pesna so neverojatna vrednost :-)) uzivjate..
skopjemoe 1 year ago
im scared
vacuumlover1 1 year ago
Im suprsied Im not seeing any comments about this being lady gaga's ancestor.
oscarX 1 year ago
this is creepy
guda4siempre 1 year ago
thia is awesome great woowwwwwwwwwwwwww
slymn2k7 1 year ago
There is a recording of an experimental talking clock from 1878.
peacemaker083 1 year ago
@peacemaker083 No, that's not true.
tinpanalley67 1 year ago
@tinpanalley67 It is true. Go to tinfoil dot com. They have a ton of recordings. Including the experimental talking clock. Frank Lambert created it. If you'd do the research you would know it..
peacemaker083 1 year ago
@peacemaker083 I'm sorry for being so ignorant.
tinpanalley67 1 year ago
btw edison was a thief, fraud & conspirator to murder
JRussoBuffaloNY 1 year ago
@JRussoBuffaloNY
I've read that Edison may have taken credit for other people's inventions, but this is the first I've heard of him conspiring to murder. Could you be specific? If it's too time-consuming to respond, could you please post a link to this information? I hope it's not true, but I will look at any evidence objectively.
Perlinator67 11 months ago
This is amazing, the recordings are almost 150 years old, it sounds like shit, but it's still amazing. :D
kris019940 1 year ago
creepy
jellyboy123 1 year ago
Thomas Edison's recording was of him laughing and yelling Mary Had a Little Lamb. You can hear it cleanly in Thomas Edison The Man.
Pokemon978IsBackOn 1 year ago
its weird
you know the voices are dead
but weirdly here they are....
scary
esfelectra 1 year ago
why scary? We also know Lennon or Cobain are dead, however I don't see anything scary about them except whether you think their music sucks. This is simply astounding and wonderful, kinda like The Twilight Zone.
Ojosappo 1 year ago
The people who first played this Phonautograph recording now have done more research and discovered they played the recording twice the intended speed. The voice is a man, actually it is Leon Scott himself. The Edison recording is from a film soundtrack Aug. 12, 1927.
mjb784533 1 year ago 4
@mjb784533 Have they tried slowing down the playback speed to the original?
OmegaWolf747 1 year ago
@OmegaWolf747 Oh, yeah! Then it would be totally "Black Sabbath" creepy. I don't know why metal bands aren't using these ancient gadgets. Just think of all the ways you could freak people out with the spooky recordings. :P
gamesDAMNED 1 year ago
@gamesDAMNED That would be cool.
OmegaWolf747 1 year ago
@gamesDAMNED I know that what is most frightening is when people make recording about abusing drugs & killing police officers & other deviances etc. but the "poor" sound quality of the worlds first recording of the daughter of the inventor of this device is far from frightening.
JRussoBuffaloNY 1 year ago
this is so creepy
dpoma 1 year ago
The phonautograph was invented purely as a scientific novelty to make soundwaves visible, it was not understood that the patterns made by the device were actually a recording of the sound that only needed a playback device
TashkentFox 2 years ago
Then we could say the first recording from 1860 was the first ever made but Edisons recording from 1877 was the first one that worked?
thorir30 1 year ago
sounds like a warped version of the dr who theme
DiamandaHagan 2 years ago
Man this freaked me out. especially cause I saw this at night. o__0
Pretty cool though how much everything's changed since then. Thank God too! Can you imagine how creepy it'd be if today's songs were recorded like that? *shudders*
sharinganqueen 2 years ago 39
I know It was like someone reaching out from the grave.
va3lan 2 years ago 30
@va3lan they are reaching from the dead... they're dead now whoever they are :)
dragostrance 9 months ago
@sharinganqueen True. Imagine recording something today, then reducing the quality by about 10'000 fold, that's about right, lol
Enk64 1 year ago
@sharinganqueen yes creepy, but i still thinks that this is better than justin bieber.
Imak3 11 months ago
@sharinganqueen hmmmm, Today's songs are actually quite creepy as is all that dirty talk and vulgarity,to be honest that wasn't creepy at all.
DeutscheRossiya 11 months ago
@sharinganqueen I guess justin bieber would sound better this way, though
rubnaus 7 months ago
@sharinganqueen dude when u said tht u made me shudder holy shit
skyarme 7 months ago
What's up with the 2 notes playing and walkietalkie sound effect after the person saying pierrot? Or was she still singing and then the recorder stopped?
03mrx 2 years ago
you're awesome, edison. and genious!
boyhey1 2 years ago
I'm sure back then the creators thought that was really some accomplishment - and it was. Can you imagine if they could come back and see where technology is today...I'm not even sure if the word (technology) was even around then.. but golly gee wiz, look how far we've come... now That's the scary part... really!!! Scotty....beam me up now!
rturnerful 2 years ago
this is creepy. I wish i could see the woman doing it. she musta bin proper excited wen she heard herself back. first person ever.
TheMrGobble 2 years ago
but the thing is, that the guy who recorded it, he did'nt play it back, he did'nt even know he could, he just studied the marks her voice made on the "whateveritwas"
xmadteaparty 2 years ago
That Edison recording isn't actually the original. The original was lost. That was Edison recreating it in the 1920s.
jooshiscrazy 2 years ago 10
its sounds like an infant its not scary at all
Aries1slayer 2 years ago 2
I think it's a bit scary...I mean, I'm sure the woman wasn't scary in real life...but just the thought of her voice coming through after 149 years, all distorted and crackly and surreal, is a bit unnerving.
JackieMagenta 2 years ago 55
agreed...feels like she's being brought back to life!
RollandB 2 years ago
@JackieMagenta it was a man
leporello56 1 year ago
@leporello56 no, it was a women!
levizer 1 year ago
@levizer Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville is a man AND he was the voice you heard in the first clip.. The second clip is just a woman singing but it WASN't him
PookeoResurrected1 1 year ago
@JackieMagenta That person wasn't woman. It was man, possibly, the inventor.
This record is double-speeded( chipmunk'd)
tinpanalley67 1 year ago
@JackieMagenta
i kno whaha
742512345689 1 year ago