This is an interesting idea, cover up deaths n africa of malnutrition and clean water with saying hey are aids death, this would make ppl assume they are so disgusting with sex practices and NOT want to help them, when in fact its not the problem. This sounds god awful, but even as a born white man in the US, I can tell you it is not out of the question, some people are dead set on getting BIG & FAST results on reversing overpopulation. Personally I think they should off themselves first.
@ccr5cxcr4 Ok, stop with your stupid propaganda. There are ZERO proofs of the existence of HIV. There are ZERO chances AIDS is a disease, so you DON'T DIE OF AIDS, YOU DIE OF THE DISEASES THEY ATTRIBUTED TO AIDS WITH ZERO PROOFS.
Can't help but see a similarity to the Global Warming scam and terrorism threat scam. Looks like it's common for all scams of nowadays, to corrupt research/estimates by unclear definitions and computer models and scare the crap out of people with very graphic and eqaully false images. They follow exactly the same script - all these problems are very intangible and uncountable and detached from the common sense, to make people believe without checking(they wouldn't understand it so why bother)
AIDS may be a new scam elaborated but possible humanity has been scammed before by religion for example and politics like comunism etc. It truly seems like another scam.
AIDS is just one aspect fo the world depopulation program, along with vaccinations, gmo, food industry, culture industry, wars, etc There is a real race war going on right now.
@Pediculuscapitis If you have the peer reviewed reference the dissident scientists have been looking for please share. Post it my featured video....Why I Quit Hiv with Kary Mullis - Rodney Richards - more HoN
Title Date and Journal. 3 logical fallacies and you're out. I also have the direct links to the so-called "hiv" test disclaimers on my channel under the profile pic.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny you know, theres a saying. "Proof is the burden of the believer. Not the skeptic." you say that the aids denialist dont have a leg to stand on because they dont make sense. ok. then we will take this tactic. HOW ABOUT YOU PROVE HIV IS HERE AND IS THE CAUSE OF AIDS? instead of being a troll why dont you prove it? because personaly i have 3.5 inches of paperwork sitting right here in front of me from scientists doctors retroviralogists and HIV+ people wrote supporting us.
Thank you David. My good friend Jim died in NYC in 1987. Within one year Jim and all the other waiters at his restaurant died from Aids. From that day I knew something was fishey.What has this world come to when we kill each other like this.It is depressing.
@ListeningSky That guy is "Dr" Sockpuppet. So is Traviancollege. The idiot had FOUR Humanshot channels too so he could spam skeptics and give himself applause. There is a list of Some of his Known sockpuppets on my channel near the bottom. He shut most of them down....even his favorite favorite CCr5....after I mentioned KEVIN KURITSKY to him on this video....Kary Mullis Celebrates the Scientific Exepriment
I guess "Dr" Sockpuppet doesn't like the name KEVIN KURITSKY mentioned in public.
@ListeningSky Ha...in fact if you look at comments on this video from a year ago you can see where myself and guy called reggie were chasing his sorry ass down after I mentioned KEVIN KURITSKY to him on the Kary Mullis video and he started shutting sockpuppets down. I think in part 3 of this talk Humanshot2 and Humanshot1 turn up. The idiot would lose track of which sock he was using when he was flipping thru them to give himself applause.
how can aids drugs help slow down hiv when they dont know what they are hunting? hiv is said to be a retrovirus and supposing all you commenting know what that is, you should know then that makes it a cancer virus meaning it infects the host cells, therefore it simply cant kill the cells becoz it needs them to replicate, this is how retroviruses operate but for some reason HIV acts different more like a super virus from the planet Gimoa.
David Crowe say cometics and lightening creams could be causing AIDS in Africa, but why in Africa? Cometics and lightening creams have been used in Wstern Europe for a long time and they're still being used to my knowledge. This is the place were such products are produced. But I don't see or hear of Europeans dying of AIDS because of their use. Am just wondering where this theory is coming from.
@makheyi He says they cause antibody reactions which can then be picked up on Gallo's crap "hiv" antibody test. Europeans don't really use skin lighteners and cosmetics for sale in western countries are more vigorously tested for safety.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Europeans do use skin lighteners especially when aging and wrinkles start to show...there are quite a lot of them in Europe, saw some Switzerland, France, Italy, Finland and UK. And they have been used a lot...just chek youtube on that subject, you'll be amazed...Asians too do use skin lighteners...
@mykoolaidtastesfunny As you age, your skin gets thinner and dryer. Collagen and elastin, the networks of fibers that make your skin firm and elastic, become disconnected, leading to sagging and wrinkles. And your cells simply slow down: New skin cells don't grow as quickly and dead cells don't shed as quickly, resulting in dull, grayish skin. Finally, older skin is more likely to develop brown spots because pigment cells, or melanocytes, begin to grow irregularly.
@makheyi He said the DEFINITION of AIDS by the WHO in Africa is *different* from the west. So if u have dyssentry or diarreah or some skin disease or tubercolosis, they all come under "AIDS" if you are in Africa. That way they can say millions are dying of AIDS (and push AIDS drugs on them which actually make them really sick and die) but the truth is they are sick from malnutrition (solved thru food), or other causes like the chemicals in skin-whiteners. watch the video again
@chicawhappa I think I understood what he said about diseases associated with AIDS and why they push drugs to Africa. Malnutrition is know to cause so many diseases and this is clear to me and everyone. He mentioned Skin lighteners, but he didn't say they cause AIDS, he's just speculating. Besides Europeans have used skin lighteners for ages and they dont have AIDS, so this couldn't be the cause of AIDS. And skin lighteners have been used even before AIDS was discovered so can he explain that?
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Well this is a speculation and it's not a scientific proof. In science we conduct tests and experiments or observe people over a period of time. As I stated earlier skin lighteners have been around since man existed and these guys could have discoverd they cause some reaction.
@makheyi Ican't imgine how. If yu want to see scientific documentation of causes of reactions on those crap tests google..........WHOSE ANTIBODIES ARE THEY ANYWAY?
Factors Known to Cause False Positive HIV Antibody Test Results
might be flu might be malaria might be hepatitis might be pregnancy or aprevious pregnancy might be TB might be herpes might be cancer might be leprosy might be kidney failure might be a recent vaccination might be rheumatoid arthritis might be cirrhosis of th....
@mykoolaidtastesfunny To base your arguments on speculation is not science at all. I these guys were scientists, I think they'd know exactly what to do, I think that's what we want to hear here. Maybe they want some funding to start their research projects who knows....why all the talk about this when you cant provide a good solution to the problem.
No you didn' t understand - the DEFINITION of what is AIDS is different in Africa. Like, if u get a skin rash from a skin whitener or gastric problems from malnutrition, in the rest of the world espy the West they would be just that - a skin rash or gastric problems. But if you're in Africa and u go to the doctor with these problems, they will file it under AIDS because they CAN over there thanks to 'special' Aids definitions set up by the health organizations FOR AFRICA ONLY.
This way they can say 60% are dying of AIDS when really most of those are just suffering from 'regular' diseases or infections/problems which are not AIDS-related even (the way we understand AIDS to be in the West and other parts of the world).
fuck u asshole u need to lose someone u love to learn not to bubble shit for public attention you gay fuck.by the way africa has got authentic food not the western modified foods asholes like you sound as satanist preachers you i hope you burn in hell being fucked by the devil in yo ass like u like it.bastard
Theres still wars and still dictators. Many of the leaders are Knights of Malta such as Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki. These two are both subordinate to the Duke of Gloucester and to the Dame of Malta, Queen Elizabeth II. The same old British Empire trojan horse of Rome.
I'll tell you how to disprove this guy. Have him have sex with 3 hiv positive women, with out a condom, and test him in 3 months. For one this guy would say hell no, to that but it would prove that his claim hiv isn't sexually transmitted is such bull shit
@montanasosa21 if you can find the HIV virus and give me a vial I'd inject myself with it in a heartbeat, so long as I'm allowed to continue eating my vegan diet, I am convinced absolutely nothing will happen? Why? because you can't isolate a virus, therefore you can't inject anyone with it. Dr Deusberg has offered to do this but has been refused all funding and permission to publish work since questioning the AIDS hypothesis. I see all those who believe in it simply don't answer David's points.
@montanasosa21 The largestandlongest study ever done of hetero trabsmission found ZERO transmission even after 10 years of sex. With condoms without condoms...zero is zero
Google.....THERE WILL BE NO HETEROSEXUAL AIDSEPIDEMIC EXPERTS ADMIT
"...… No transmission [of HIV] occurred among the 25% of couples who did not use their condoms consistently, nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up…”
@TheKookbuster Why are you keeping this one open too? When you sooo quickly closed your favorite favorite sockpuppet CCR5 after I mentioned the name Kevin Kuritsky I thought surely he'll have the sense to close them all. Was it your sockpuppetry that made you miss so much class? It obviously wasn't because of a dead mother since your mother is alive. Google...
Blowing the whistle?
An expelled student is the latest to allege retaliation Emory
@eynshamrood Hey...when I asked your "friend" CCR5 why he sounded sooo much like Kvein Kuritski, the lying plagiariser who got booted out of Emory medical school 2 months before graduation in the BOTTOM 12% of the class...you closed that account. WHy are you keeping this one and TheKookbuster and Nousides and lmao...well you know....why are you keeping all the others open? Do you still cling to fantasies of sockpuppet glory on youtube?
@ccr5cxcr4 Her "comments" aren't in the study you idiot. "Comments" are not empirical data. DUH!
" No transmission [of HIV] occurred among the 25% of couples who did not use their condoms consistently, nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up (Padian pg 356)
@ccr5cxcr4 Sweetie you don't even know the difference btw the Padian Study published in 1997 and the spin she wrote ten years AFTER the study was published. THIS is her study...."We observed no seroconversions after entry into the study [nobody became HIV positive]This evidence argues for low infectivity in the absence of either needle sharing and/or other cofactors.
Padian determined that outside of intravenous drug use, this was not a very transmissible sexually-transmissible disease.
@ccr5cxcr4 Lol.....sorry "Dr" Sockpuppet. THAT is NOT part of her study. DUH! Can't you read? She wrote that ten years AFTER her study was published. DUH! Will Meyerdesrvedarrest be making an appearance now? Lmao
i thought you said you were leaving youtube for 6 months. wasnt that just yesterday or the day before?
.
see how your obsession controls you
i just got yet another message from someone saying you claim they are me. that guy made his account over 3 years ago
.
its been a pleasure watching you unravel TROLL. you claim to be a smart 'doctor' yet you are compelled to cut n past the very same comments across multiple versions of the same video & with your various accounts
No son, I am going to walk away from YT for six more months, and when I come back, I know you will sill be here, because you have nothing else to keep you alive"
.
isnt it cute how he thinks im his progeny? if i was i would have put myself in child protective services long ago
Here he demonstrates he's stupid, in talking about the Covells. NOBODY denies that a virus named HIV exists and is communicable. That Covell's husband isn't HIV positive only demonstrates that the virus has low communicability.
BTW, both Mrs. Covell and her 3 year old daughter are now dead, from pathologies often seen as "AIDS."
@GetMeThere1 Um...yeah..plenty of reputable scientists dispute that "hiv" was ever isolated. For one thing the "hiv" tests to this day STILL have no reference standard. As for it being communicable....The largest and longest study of hetero transmission found ZERO transmission even after ten years of sex. With condoms without condoms. No difference. Zero is zero.
To see the Padian Study for yourself go to HELPFORHIV com or for just the results google..."The Padian Waffle" or "There Will Be No Heterosexual Aids Epidemic Experts Admit"
The direct link to the 2nd article is on my channle and also has the results of studies with Tel Aviv hookers, Tijuana hookers and some African hookers as well as the direct link to the interview with the World Health Organization
conotoxins latest ploy has been to try & bully me to suicide. nice guy huh? [anyone whos wondering just message me & ill show where] i wonder where he got his 'medical degree'? josef mengele university?
.
someone told me that if hes telling the truth about being in atlanta, he most likely works at emery university hospital. do you think you can ask if any of your contacts in the med world know if there is a state based complaints department for hospital workers?
@Reggieworth O **** him....I mean "them" Lmao. He doesn't work anywhere. WHEN does he work? WHEN? lmao ....he's too busy playing with his sockpuppets on youtube. Thekookbuster eynshamrood meyerdesrvedarrest Humanshot Humanshot1 humanshot2 humanshot3 ccr5 Traviancollege etc etc etc Look at what "they"re" doing at "AIDS INC"
MAYBE he works as a janitor someplace but beyond that....LMAO!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@GetMeThere1 I suspect you meant to refer to Christine Maggiore and her daughter. EJ died of an allergic reaction to antibiotics. That's why there was no trial or even an indictment. If you have info re EJ's medical records that the DA missed during his year long investigation into the case then share it with him forthwith.
Christine died of renal failure which the last time I checked isn't an OI.
He just got done saying that HIV isn't tested for in Africa and now he is saying that dirty needles are what is causing false positives. How can their be so many false positives if nobody is being tested? This guy is nuts.
on "Airbus Crash" great evidence of the troll boy's ways.....Comment(s) marked as spam Hide
humanshot3 (1 month ago)
Comment removed by author
ccr5cxcr4 (1 month ago) -1 Reply | Spam
yep Humanshot3 has made a rare appearance. If you go to
Text Comments (55,232) Options
and choose show all comments you can see what he's working so hard to censor. Some of it IS just garbage but a some is people trying to expose his sockpuppet ass.
by god you just don't let up do you first you start saying the antroviral theoropy is good which it is then you turn around and say that drugs are evil pham company game but i have no time to go through all you ridicules posts because your like diarrhea you dont stop spewing shit out your ass. Im not replying to any of your posts. cuz even when i owned many times you just keep going so im off
oh for god sake this is ridiculous. Toxic drugs my ass. Im pretty sure that if there was a cure for aids it would be sold already. And condoms help prevent the spread of aids. Veggies dont cure AIDS
Go tell that to Montagnier...he just won the Nobel Prize for "hiv"
Nobel Laureate Montagnier: HIV Can Be Cleared Naturally - House of Numbers
He admits that "hiv" won't make healthy people sick and that immune problems can be treated with nutrition except there's no profit in nutrition. Go see for yourselves. It's my featured video for anyone who can't find it
So bullshit theres profit in food retard theres profit in everything the food industry is huge. + veggies dont cure cancer. If he proven its a cure for aids then why hasnt he tried it on anyone. Im pretty sure that if someone was cured from aids it would be all over cbc or bbc. Please understand what your trying to argue before you start typing
The pharma co's make BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars every year from the virus of mass destruction. If the cure is as simple as healthy living and fermented papaya juice...Montagnier's suggestion....they lose out don't they? I guess you didn't bother to watch the video. Please do not complain about something you didn't take the time to watch.
If you have complaint about it you should go watch the video and leave a comment there.
Fake aids cures are dangerous and the people who make them make profits off of peoples suffering. You cant cure aids you can delay it but its not getting cured
20. Why have improvements in "virological responses" ("viral load" and CD4 counts) to HAART not translated into decreased clinical progression to AIDS and death (31)?
direct links to the studies are included in the article
This is ONE of the studies referenced May, MT et al, 2006. "HIV treatment response and prognosis in Europe and North America in the first decade of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis", Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):427-8,
INTERPRETATION: Virological response after starting HAART improved over calendar years, but such improvement has NOT translated into a decrease in mortality.
aniretroviral therapy is different from veggies you fucking retard so thank you for proving my point that you can't get rid of aids. the only problem with the theropy is that alot of the people who get aids are in poorer countries and can't get access to it. That is one of the drugs or treatments you can get for aids. It helps delay the virus from completely owning your body and killing you.
Buddy the drugs sometimes have bad side effects but its the best you have. Your jumping all over the place like one minute you say drugs are bad the next you say they arnt pick a side and stick with it.
"HIV=AIDS=DEATH is a gross error. The medical community is providing deadly drugs to positive HIV patients, that will cause certain death to them. Then, the myth will be played on, with the doctor reporting that they died from AIDS, not from the complications of these deadly drugs. The madness must stop."
— Dr. Craig Michael Uhl, MD, former U.S. Navy physician, California
so your going to belive what a former navy doctor says on a subject he probably knows nothing about. First you say drugs are good then you say drugs are bad. Your not a credible source of info. aniretroviral theoropy is a good way to get help slow the hiv virus but the drugs are hard to make and are very expensive and are only availible in certain places. And if you get hiv or aids you are probably going to die. No magic potion is going to cure it.
I grew up with this in the family and the ONLY people that I have seen get sick or die of "hiv" have been the people on the meds. The UNmedicated junkies have outlived the medicated health nuts.
That's why I started asking questions.
And dude...obviously it's all the same guy doing the thumbsdowning. This video has no traffic. He does this to everyone he..I mean" they disagrees with. EVERYWHERE "they" go. I knew him from these videos and then one day I thought to google his names.
Here's what I've seen after growing up with this in the family...the ONLY people getting sick or dying of "hiv" have been the ones taking the meds. The UNmedicated junkies are fine.
Who the hell am I to know so many "exceptions"? In 20 years JUST exceptions actually. So one day I started asking questions
doomsday, are you saying you don't believe any of the drugs routinely prescribed for HIV positive people are toxic?
AZT most definitely is, to name one. When packaged for lab use, it comes with warnings that it's highly toxic, and to avoid even skin contact. The info leaflet states it attacks the bone marrow, and gives a list of symptoms of poisoning with it that reads like severe advanced AIDS
a good source that states that HTLV was the first pathogenic retrovirus discovered, in 1981, whereas the discovery of hepatits b occurred in 1963, I believe, and I seem to be getting conflicting reports as to exactly whether or not it is a retrovirus. That aside, I admit defeat in this matter. I will educate myself in this matter, and if I feel after doing so I have a worthwhile contribution to make, I will do so. In the meantime, I offer my apologies, and retract all previous statements.
I did some reading. And now I need to do some more. It seems, indeed, that HTLV is also considered by mainstream science to be a pathogenic retrovirus. I guess the reason Rasnick and Duesberg don't consider HIV pathogenic is the same reason they assume HTLV to be harmless. However, what Rasnick says about mainstream science not having been able to demonstrate other pathogenic retroviruses is not true, even if it's what he believes, and his statement is therefore entirely misleading. I have(cont)
whom the disease was a problem and those whose bodies had overcome it. My understanding was, again from school, I am a complete layperson, that the presence of antibodies meant a disease could not return. Whilst this is certainly true for many diseases, maybe it is not true for all? Does none of you find it strange that after 25 years working on this condition and the hundreds of billions of dollars invested that researchers have been unable to produce a vaccine? The simplest explanation (cont)
contain antibodies to both but not the pathogens themselves. Having been immunised against hepatitis, presumably by blood would again contain antibodies to this virus but not the pathogen itself. Would a "sufferer" of hepatitis's body also produce antibodies? Would they be different antibodies, identifiable with an antibody test, or is there just one kind? You can see the problem: if both bodies were producing antibodies, this need not necessarily in itself distinguish between those for (cont)
FTAO: ccr5cxcr4, conotoxin, any humanshot, travian college, croakermd, nousides, raxinfull, or any other of the gang. Sirs, perhaps one of you fine fellows could enlighten me and other youtube viewers as to the rationale for the HIV antibody test. It seems I am labouring under some misapprehensions. In things like chicken pox and measles, the body starts producing antibodies when the infection has been overcome by the body. As such, having been exposed to both naturally, my blood would (cont)
To clarify, I just need to be shown that it is possible for another retrovirus to cause harm or be sexually transmitted. Such characteristics could appear in two different viruses. If David Rasnick is wrong on this matter I would certainly be surprised, but, then again, nothing much surprises me any more. You should plainly be able to see the inherent danger of making the kind of cause/effect assumptions implicit within the mainstream HIV/AIDS paradigm, but I'm not actually sure you do.
All you and your cronies do is provide anecdotal evidence that many people who test HIV+ seem to die untimely deaths. Having no access to such data, I cannot claim that people within this demographic don't have shorter life expectancies, but my perfectly reasonable question is why this should be attributed to a retrovirus. To fully admit defeat, I need a single example of a retrovirus other than HIV that in clinical tests has been proven to cause physical harm, and to be transmitted sexually.
Okay, then, can you inform me of any other retrovirus which has been proved to be harmful to either man or beast? Just one, give me a name for me to research. If you can do this to my satisfaction I will willingly admit defeat. Apparently, there have been some 4000 catalogued, so it shouldn't be hard.
Question: did Robert Gallo not state publically that in his opinion no one knew more about retroviruses than Peter Deusberg? From "Investing the AIDS Virus" by Peter Duesberg: 'In 1946, Stanley received the first Nobel Prize ever awarded to a virologist, and two years afterward established the Virus Lab at the Berkley campus of the University of California, where he later supervised the training of Harry Rubin, Peter Duesberg, and others scientists in virus research.'
Why call me an idiot? Yes, I know what peer-reviewed means, yes, I know what verbatim means. It was 7 years ago. I am not claiming it is 100% correct, just close to it. If I said it was verbatim I would be lying, but it's very close. This is not a hard concept to grasp. You are very rude. You indeed are Nousides. Just so everyone knows. Please see the page of user: MyKoolAidTastesFunny for a complete list of this guy's accounts. The deepest circle of hell of reserved for deceivers and mutineers.
Restate previous question: please go on the record to confirm you and Nousides are not one and the same. I'm questioning your integrity right now. And just because these "science" rags won't publish a paper doesn't mean the work is not legitimate, rather that it doesn't fit the bankrupt consensus model. The Lancet, Nature, The New Scientist publish so much that is utter drivel that Deusberg's article would have no doubt raised the tone immesurably.
He did not say have unprotected sex, he did not mention protection. How you let my words get twisted. Nousides knows exactly what I said. I am not a liar, and I don't appreciate the insinuation. You are a liar, and I know this to be a fact. That is pretty much verbatim the message I got from the sexual heatlh centre, too. I doubt very much whether I am the only one to have received such advice. Maybe someone else can back up what I'm saying. I do not knowingly lie. Period. You should be ashamed.
Second hand information is always problematic. More name calling I notice. Why would I expect better? Someone thinks you are the same account as Nousides. Is this true? I have just ordered Deusberg's seminal Inventing the AIDS Virus. I think it's time I did some proper reading. Perhaps you can do what Nousides was unable to, answer my questions relating to retroviruses. They are quite clearly stated, so good luck. PS, try and be a grown up and do so without resorting to playground langauge.
The message "we don't think it's necessary for you to be tested for HIV, but you can if you want" was relayed to me by both the doctor who provided the physical examination and the administrator who decided what I was going to be tested for. The only logical conclusion is they didn't want another hetro male testing negative, cause it's more evidence that their hypothesis about the cause of HIV is 100% redundant. I'm from the gay capital of the UK, the test centre completely HAS a mandate to test
Also, stop calling me boy. You're a disrespectful little nobody. You're wrong, real world time. One in a thousand people diagnosed HIV+ in the UK. Mostly gay men, women that slept with bisexual men, and African immigrants. Like I said, he's a realist. You're not. Risk = negligible, advice well meant. Knew it wouldn't be acted upon, but to hear from a doctor that sex wasn't some thing to be afraid of was the order of the day. You lose. Again. And again, and again...
Lol, no you didn't, you provided one source from that rag, The Lancet. You will not answer my questions because you cannot answer my questions. Btw, what's your doctorate in, shiny floors?
Final chance. Respond to my messages of three hours previously or admit defeat. Peter Deusberg was and is acknowledged as the world's premier authority on retroviruses. He has produced peer-reviewed work that states explicitly why retroviruses cannot harm their host. How and why is he wrong? Antibodies to a disease demonstrate its defeat by the body. There are no exceptions to this rule. Yet HIV antibodies are considered evidence of illness? How is this possible? Put up or shut up.
He's just the troll boy...google these accounts...Nousides rasnixful humanshot humanshot1 ALL the Humanshots obviously ilfousdetaguel etc etc...I have the list on my channel.
He spends ALL day on youtube pretending to be different people so "someone" will agree with him. He's also on ALL the UF student tasered videos, all over AIDS INC and is obsessed with vegans for some reason...check out the comments here too...Conflict This is the Alf
all the same guy. I have the list of his troll accounts on my channel. He spends ALLLL day on youtube pretending to be different people , posting the same crap & spamming everyone he disagrees with. Yes, it's weird and sick
Pharma shill alert...ccr5cxcr4 aka Humanshot aka Humanshot1 aka Humanshot2 aka Humanshot3 aka Rasnixful aka Nousides etc etc I have a list of his shill accounts on my channel.
Google the names ;) "They" always turn up "together" and go on spamming campaigns He's a total scientology style censorship fiend.
twat ccrcx5 or however you want to spell your name, or is it humanshot humanshot1 humanshot2 humanshot3 croakermd lldefougaste jeez you are a troll spammer with multiple accounts and nobody likes you.
But don't they have the monopoly on quack therapies?
I'll bet they're pissed!
I'll bet she probably doesn't forcibly test those therapies on minority orphan children like big pharma does. i'll bet the therapies she's pushing don't kill people either...
Apparently, ccr5cxcr4, the schooling one receives to become an MD is almost entirely worthless now. It's all about indoctrination into the big pharma cult. It's also arrogance training... you people are trained to stay in your little world of big-pharma-approved peer review, shunning anyone who steps outside the box. big pharma buys the patents on actual 'cures' for anything and throws it in file 13. Shame on you for your cheering of a system that is the #3 killer in the US.
he's a liar! I'm not any of those people, I've never claimed to have medical training and I'm not selling anything! He just likes to project his multiple personality issues onto others.
Hit.."show spam"...He likes to spam away all dispute.
He claims to be an internist... (ER) which should mean he works 70+ hours per week peddling quackery. Not sure where one would find the time to screw around with ppl on youtube... he doesn't allow comments on his own videos (in which he likes to slam others)... i have a special abiding disgust for people like that. I guess you can tell ;)
He has about a dozen different accounts that I know of so that makes his claim to be an ER doctor even less believable. Most likely he's just an internet marketer with some type of science degree. I've heard that there are companies that hire people to promote their products online and it's a good way for people to help pay off student loans.
if this was true then why I have found out about it on youtube and not as a breaking news that everybody in the world talks about? this man would be a 1 million dollar Nobel prize winner for medicine research but he isn't, besides all he does is just talking and proving nothing, and do you know why? because this is BULLSHIT!
One of the most difficult things to write is a refutation of a massive fraud, especially a health fraud, in the face of media control and knowledge monopolies by financial powerhouses. Making it still more difficult is the possible threat of libel lawsuits from the powerful parties essentially accused of scientific misconduct at best and criminal negligence at worst.
Joel Kauffman, PhD Organic Chemistry MIT. Emeritus Professor of Chemistry University of the Sciences in Philadelphia A specialist in exploratory drug development, he obtained grants& contracts from the US National Institutes of Health the Department of Energy, the Office of Naval Research Army Research Office& various companies Author of 80 papers on chemical and medical topics, and holder of 11 patents, including 2 on anti-tuberculosis drugs, Dr. Kauffman now works to expose fraud in medicine
This has been flagged as spam show
This is an interesting idea, cover up deaths n africa of malnutrition and clean water with saying hey are aids death, this would make ppl assume they are so disgusting with sex practices and NOT want to help them, when in fact its not the problem. This sounds god awful, but even as a born white man in the US, I can tell you it is not out of the question, some people are dead set on getting BIG & FAST results on reversing overpopulation. Personally I think they should off themselves first.
xinecallaw 4 hours ago
I took 1 look at this guy's necktie, and knew he is not to be taken serious...
zoetvanham 2 days ago
@ccr5cxcr4 Ok, stop with your stupid propaganda. There are ZERO proofs of the existence of HIV. There are ZERO chances AIDS is a disease, so you DON'T DIE OF AIDS, YOU DIE OF THE DISEASES THEY ATTRIBUTED TO AIDS WITH ZERO PROOFS.
yowyOw69 in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 4 months ago
Can't help but see a similarity to the Global Warming scam and terrorism threat scam. Looks like it's common for all scams of nowadays, to corrupt research/estimates by unclear definitions and computer models and scare the crap out of people with very graphic and eqaully false images. They follow exactly the same script - all these problems are very intangible and uncountable and detached from the common sense, to make people believe without checking(they wouldn't understand it so why bother)
JJTechnologies 6 months ago
AIDS may be a new scam elaborated but possible humanity has been scammed before by religion for example and politics like comunism etc. It truly seems like another scam.
alracgabu 6 months ago
AIDS is just one aspect fo the world depopulation program, along with vaccinations, gmo, food industry, culture industry, wars, etc There is a real race war going on right now.
Quex01 6 months ago
Life is too short for this kind of drivel. Shame on me for wasting several hours of my life on this nonsense. Shame on YOU if you repeat my mistake.
PEOPLE DON'T BELIEVE THIS PSEUDOSCIENCE!!!
Pediculuscapitis 7 months ago
Life is too short for this kind of drivel. Shame on me for wasting several hours of my life on this nonsense. Shame on YOU if you repeat my mistake.
PEOPLE DON'T BELIEVE THIS PSEUDOSCIENCE!!!
Read this to get your facts straight => ww.physics.smu.edu/pseudo/AIDS/
Pediculuscapitis 7 months ago
@Pediculuscapitis If you have the peer reviewed reference the dissident scientists have been looking for please share. Post it my featured video....Why I Quit Hiv with Kary Mullis - Rodney Richards - more HoN
Title Date and Journal. 3 logical fallacies and you're out. I also have the direct links to the so-called "hiv" test disclaimers on my channel under the profile pic.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to Pediculuscapitis (Show the comment) 6 months ago
@Pediculuscapitis There are ZERO scientific papers referenced in your link. Aidstruth is actually listed as a credible reference lmao
google....THE GUINEA PIG KIDS THE BBC AND THE AIDSTRUTH MAFIA
The fact is nobody disputes the existence of immune problems so "aids" denier doesn't even make sense. Nice "facts"
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to Pediculuscapitis (Show the comment) 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny you know, theres a saying. "Proof is the burden of the believer. Not the skeptic." you say that the aids denialist dont have a leg to stand on because they dont make sense. ok. then we will take this tactic. HOW ABOUT YOU PROVE HIV IS HERE AND IS THE CAUSE OF AIDS? instead of being a troll why dont you prove it? because personaly i have 3.5 inches of paperwork sitting right here in front of me from scientists doctors retroviralogists and HIV+ people wrote supporting us.
retandom in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 3 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny woops. that last post was ment for that doochebag Pediculuscapitis, sorry yo.
retandom in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 3 months ago
Thank you David. My good friend Jim died in NYC in 1987. Within one year Jim and all the other waiters at his restaurant died from Aids. From that day I knew something was fishey.What has this world come to when we kill each other like this.It is depressing.
commins100 7 months ago
@IlSeFousDeTaGuele Please cite your reference. The paper and the journal?
ListeningSky 8 months ago
@ListeningSky That guy is "Dr" Sockpuppet. So is Traviancollege. The idiot had FOUR Humanshot channels too so he could spam skeptics and give himself applause. There is a list of Some of his Known sockpuppets on my channel near the bottom. He shut most of them down....even his favorite favorite CCr5....after I mentioned KEVIN KURITSKY to him on this video....Kary Mullis Celebrates the Scientific Exepriment
I guess "Dr" Sockpuppet doesn't like the name KEVIN KURITSKY mentioned in public.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to ListeningSky (Show the comment) 8 months ago
@ListeningSky Ha...in fact if you look at comments on this video from a year ago you can see where myself and guy called reggie were chasing his sorry ass down after I mentioned KEVIN KURITSKY to him on the Kary Mullis video and he started shutting sockpuppets down. I think in part 3 of this talk Humanshot2 and Humanshot1 turn up. The idiot would lose track of which sock he was using when he was flipping thru them to give himself applause.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to ListeningSky (Show the comment) 8 months ago
Piling falacy upon falacy. Cutting though the veneer of respectability (tie, glasses) is a bald-faced liar.
jonnyneviripine 10 months ago
@jonnyneviripine WHAT "falacy" (sic) WHAT "lies"?
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to jonnyneviripine (Show the comment) 10 months ago
@jonnyneviripine Your channel name is sick disgusting joke btw......google....Out of control:
AIDS and the corruption of medical science
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to jonnyneviripine (Show the comment) 10 months ago 2
@dust2dust2day You're a fake. I already had to block your weird troll account from my channel.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
how can aids drugs help slow down hiv when they dont know what they are hunting? hiv is said to be a retrovirus and supposing all you commenting know what that is, you should know then that makes it a cancer virus meaning it infects the host cells, therefore it simply cant kill the cells becoz it needs them to replicate, this is how retroviruses operate but for some reason HIV acts different more like a super virus from the planet Gimoa.
azraelblame 1 year ago
David Crowe say cometics and lightening creams could be causing AIDS in Africa, but why in Africa? Cometics and lightening creams have been used in Wstern Europe for a long time and they're still being used to my knowledge. This is the place were such products are produced. But I don't see or hear of Europeans dying of AIDS because of their use. Am just wondering where this theory is coming from.
makheyi 1 year ago
@makheyi He says they cause antibody reactions which can then be picked up on Gallo's crap "hiv" antibody test. Europeans don't really use skin lighteners and cosmetics for sale in western countries are more vigorously tested for safety.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Europeans do use skin lighteners especially when aging and wrinkles start to show...there are quite a lot of them in Europe, saw some Switzerland, France, Italy, Finland and UK. And they have been used a lot...just chek youtube on that subject, you'll be amazed...Asians too do use skin lighteners...
makheyi in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@makheyi Skin lightening has absolutely nothing to do with wrinkles.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny As you age, your skin gets thinner and dryer. Collagen and elastin, the networks of fibers that make your skin firm and elastic, become disconnected, leading to sagging and wrinkles. And your cells simply slow down: New skin cells don't grow as quickly and dead cells don't shed as quickly, resulting in dull, grayish skin. Finally, older skin is more likely to develop brown spots because pigment cells, or melanocytes, begin to grow irregularly.
makheyi in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@makheyi I know how skin aging works and the fact is that nobody uses skin lighteners to get rid of wrinkles.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Skin lightening actual cover those brown spots created by aging. I know people who use it for that purpose.
makheyi in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@makheyi He said the DEFINITION of AIDS by the WHO in Africa is *different* from the west. So if u have dyssentry or diarreah or some skin disease or tubercolosis, they all come under "AIDS" if you are in Africa. That way they can say millions are dying of AIDS (and push AIDS drugs on them which actually make them really sick and die) but the truth is they are sick from malnutrition (solved thru food), or other causes like the chemicals in skin-whiteners. watch the video again
chicawhappa in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@chicawhappa I think I understood what he said about diseases associated with AIDS and why they push drugs to Africa. Malnutrition is know to cause so many diseases and this is clear to me and everyone. He mentioned Skin lighteners, but he didn't say they cause AIDS, he's just speculating. Besides Europeans have used skin lighteners for ages and they dont have AIDS, so this couldn't be the cause of AIDS. And skin lighteners have been used even before AIDS was discovered so can he explain that?
makheyi in reply to chicawhappa (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@makheyi He never said skin lighteners are the cause of aids. He said they can be a cause of antibody reactions that turn up on the tests.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Well this is a speculation and it's not a scientific proof. In science we conduct tests and experiments or observe people over a period of time. As I stated earlier skin lighteners have been around since man existed and these guys could have discoverd they cause some reaction.
makheyi in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@makheyi Really? The cavemen were using skin lighteners? is that right?
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Oh what a nice joke...I think I have made my point.
makheyi in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@makheyi Ican't imgine how. If yu want to see scientific documentation of causes of reactions on those crap tests google..........WHOSE ANTIBODIES ARE THEY ANYWAY?
Factors Known to Cause False Positive HIV Antibody Test Results
might be flu might be malaria might be hepatitis might be pregnancy or aprevious pregnancy might be TB might be herpes might be cancer might be leprosy might be kidney failure might be a recent vaccination might be rheumatoid arthritis might be cirrhosis of th....
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny To base your arguments on speculation is not science at all. I these guys were scientists, I think they'd know exactly what to do, I think that's what we want to hear here. Maybe they want some funding to start their research projects who knows....why all the talk about this when you cant provide a good solution to the problem.
makheyi in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@makheyi There's no money in NOT selling tests and drugsto people. Who would fund something that isn't going to make them any money?
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@makheyi
No you didn' t understand - the DEFINITION of what is AIDS is different in Africa. Like, if u get a skin rash from a skin whitener or gastric problems from malnutrition, in the rest of the world espy the West they would be just that - a skin rash or gastric problems. But if you're in Africa and u go to the doctor with these problems, they will file it under AIDS because they CAN over there thanks to 'special' Aids definitions set up by the health organizations FOR AFRICA ONLY.
chicawhappa in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@makheyi
This way they can say 60% are dying of AIDS when really most of those are just suffering from 'regular' diseases or infections/problems which are not AIDS-related even (the way we understand AIDS to be in the West and other parts of the world).
chicawhappa in reply to chicawhappa (Show the comment) 1 year ago
Comment removed
chicawhappa in reply to makheyi (Show the comment) 1 year ago
fuck u asshole u need to lose someone u love to learn not to bubble shit for public attention you gay fuck.by the way africa has got authentic food not the western modified foods asholes like you sound as satanist preachers you i hope you burn in hell being fucked by the devil in yo ass like u like it.bastard
100118923 1 year ago
watch this on youtube
Amazing: how to cure cancer & HIV (Dr. Bob Beck) -part 1/13
honestTom333 1 year ago
Pregnancy is also a false test indicator claiming you have HIV and you know how often Africans are breeding.
anunnaki2006 1 year ago
Theres still wars and still dictators. Many of the leaders are Knights of Malta such as Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki. These two are both subordinate to the Duke of Gloucester and to the Dame of Malta, Queen Elizabeth II. The same old British Empire trojan horse of Rome.
anunnaki2006 1 year ago
I'll tell you how to disprove this guy. Have him have sex with 3 hiv positive women, with out a condom, and test him in 3 months. For one this guy would say hell no, to that but it would prove that his claim hiv isn't sexually transmitted is such bull shit
montanasosa21 1 year ago
@montanasosa21 if you can find the HIV virus and give me a vial I'd inject myself with it in a heartbeat, so long as I'm allowed to continue eating my vegan diet, I am convinced absolutely nothing will happen? Why? because you can't isolate a virus, therefore you can't inject anyone with it. Dr Deusberg has offered to do this but has been refused all funding and permission to publish work since questioning the AIDS hypothesis. I see all those who believe in it simply don't answer David's points.
MarioSavioTZM in reply to montanasosa21 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@montanasosa21 The largestandlongest study ever done of hetero trabsmission found ZERO transmission even after 10 years of sex. With condoms without condoms...zero is zero
Google.....THERE WILL BE NO HETEROSEXUAL AIDSEPIDEMIC EXPERTS ADMIT
"...… No transmission [of HIV] occurred among the 25% of couples who did not use their condoms consistently, nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up…”
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to montanasosa21 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
So. What's your proof it exists? This guy makes many good points. Would you like to continue with the straw man or rebut his argument?
bweazel 1 year ago
@TheKookbuster Why are you keeping this one open too? When you sooo quickly closed your favorite favorite sockpuppet CCR5 after I mentioned the name Kevin Kuritsky I thought surely he'll have the sense to close them all. Was it your sockpuppetry that made you miss so much class? It obviously wasn't because of a dead mother since your mother is alive. Google...
Blowing the whistle?
An expelled student is the latest to allege retaliation Emory
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to TheKookbuster (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@eynshamrood Hey...when I asked your "friend" CCR5 why he sounded sooo much like Kvein Kuritski, the lying plagiariser who got booted out of Emory medical school 2 months before graduation in the BOTTOM 12% of the class...you closed that account. WHy are you keeping this one and TheKookbuster and Nousides and lmao...well you know....why are you keeping all the others open? Do you still cling to fantasies of sockpuppet glory on youtube?
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to eynshamrood (Show the comment) 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ccr5cxcr4 Her "comments" aren't in the study you idiot. "Comments" are not empirical data. DUH!
" No transmission [of HIV] occurred among the 25% of couples who did not use their condoms consistently, nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up (Padian pg 356)
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ccr5cxcr4 Sweetie you don't even know the difference btw the Padian Study published in 1997 and the spin she wrote ten years AFTER the study was published. THIS is her study...."We observed no seroconversions after entry into the study [nobody became HIV positive]This evidence argues for low infectivity in the absence of either needle sharing and/or other cofactors.
Padian determined that outside of intravenous drug use, this was not a very transmissible sexually-transmissible disease.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ccr5cxcr4 Lol...so where's the indictment O Wise Youtube Troll? DUH! Renal failure isn't an opportunistic infection "Dr' Sockpuppet.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@ccr5cxcr4 Lol.....sorry "Dr" Sockpuppet. THAT is NOT part of her study. DUH! Can't you read? She wrote that ten years AFTER her study was published. DUH! Will Meyerdesrvedarrest be making an appearance now? Lmao
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MeyerDeservedArrest
i thought you said you were leaving youtube for 6 months. wasnt that just yesterday or the day before?
.
see how your obsession controls you
i just got yet another message from someone saying you claim they are me. that guy made his account over 3 years ago
.
its been a pleasure watching you unravel TROLL. you claim to be a smart 'doctor' yet you are compelled to cut n past the very same comments across multiple versions of the same video & with your various accounts
Reggieworth in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ah yes, here it is
"ccr5cxcr4
No son, I am going to walk away from YT for six more months, and when I come back, I know you will sill be here, because you have nothing else to keep you alive"
.
isnt it cute how he thinks im his progeny? if i was i would have put myself in child protective services long ago
Reggieworth in reply to Reggieworth (Show the comment) 1 year ago
Here he demonstrates he's stupid, in talking about the Covells. NOBODY denies that a virus named HIV exists and is communicable. That Covell's husband isn't HIV positive only demonstrates that the virus has low communicability.
BTW, both Mrs. Covell and her 3 year old daughter are now dead, from pathologies often seen as "AIDS."
GetMeThere1 1 year ago
@GetMeThere1 Um...yeah..plenty of reputable scientists dispute that "hiv" was ever isolated. For one thing the "hiv" tests to this day STILL have no reference standard. As for it being communicable....The largest and longest study of hetero transmission found ZERO transmission even after ten years of sex. With condoms without condoms. No difference. Zero is zero.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to GetMeThere1 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To see the Padian Study for yourself go to HELPFORHIV com or for just the results google..."The Padian Waffle" or "There Will Be No Heterosexual Aids Epidemic Experts Admit"
The direct link to the 2nd article is on my channle and also has the results of studies with Tel Aviv hookers, Tijuana hookers and some African hookers as well as the direct link to the interview with the World Health Organization
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey koolaid,
conotoxins latest ploy has been to try & bully me to suicide. nice guy huh? [anyone whos wondering just message me & ill show where] i wonder where he got his 'medical degree'? josef mengele university?
.
someone told me that if hes telling the truth about being in atlanta, he most likely works at emery university hospital. do you think you can ask if any of your contacts in the med world know if there is a state based complaints department for hospital workers?
Reggieworth in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Reggieworth O **** him....I mean "them" Lmao. He doesn't work anywhere. WHEN does he work? WHEN? lmao ....he's too busy playing with his sockpuppets on youtube. Thekookbuster eynshamrood meyerdesrvedarrest Humanshot Humanshot1 humanshot2 humanshot3 ccr5 Traviancollege etc etc etc Look at what "they"re" doing at "AIDS INC"
MAYBE he works as a janitor someplace but beyond that....LMAO!
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to Reggieworth (Show the comment) 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@GetMeThere1 I suspect you meant to refer to Christine Maggiore and her daughter. EJ died of an allergic reaction to antibiotics. That's why there was no trial or even an indictment. If you have info re EJ's medical records that the DA missed during his year long investigation into the case then share it with him forthwith.
Christine died of renal failure which the last time I checked isn't an OI.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to GetMeThere1 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
@GetMeThere1 EJ's medcial records including her lung slides can be found here...google....JUSTICE FOR EJ
Christine's autopsy can be found here...google... HIV DEFENDANT PREVAILS OVER PHARMACEUTICAL PROPAGANDA
her autopsy is in the "adverse drug reaction" link
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to GetMeThere1 (Show the comment) 1 year ago
que se hace con los sintomas?
hernan267 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Instead of using adjectives, try making an actual argument proving the theory you claim to believe in.
Hardin9 in reply to TheKookbuster (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thanks for sharing. I feel you're honest about your word. Keep at it
jdw211 2 years ago
He just got done saying that HIV isn't tested for in Africa and now he is saying that dirty needles are what is causing false positives. How can their be so many false positives if nobody is being tested? This guy is nuts.
christo930 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's not what he said. He said in Africa a person can be labeled as an AIDS patient with or without an HIV test.
Hardin9 in reply to christo930 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
ya it was probably an accident sry
doomsday800 in reply to TheKookbuster (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
on "Airbus Crash" great evidence of the troll boy's ways.....Comment(s) marked as spam Hide
humanshot3 (1 month ago)
Comment removed by author
ccr5cxcr4 (1 month ago) -1 Reply | Spam
yep Humanshot3 has made a rare appearance. If you go to
Text Comments (55,232) Options
and choose show all comments you can see what he's working so hard to censor. Some of it IS just garbage but a some is people trying to expose his sockpuppet ass.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
im not listening to you. You always spam the shit out of everyone like is this your job. Get a life hippie
doomsday800 in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago 2
by god you just don't let up do you first you start saying the antroviral theoropy is good which it is then you turn around and say that drugs are evil pham company game but i have no time to go through all you ridicules posts because your like diarrhea you dont stop spewing shit out your ass. Im not replying to any of your posts. cuz even when i owned many times you just keep going so im off
doomsday800 in reply to TheKookbuster (Show the comment) 2 years ago
oh for god sake this is ridiculous. Toxic drugs my ass. Im pretty sure that if there was a cure for aids it would be sold already. And condoms help prevent the spread of aids. Veggies dont cure AIDS
doomsday800 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Go tell that to Montagnier...he just won the Nobel Prize for "hiv"
Nobel Laureate Montagnier: HIV Can Be Cleared Naturally - House of Numbers
He admits that "hiv" won't make healthy people sick and that immune problems can be treated with nutrition except there's no profit in nutrition. Go see for yourselves. It's my featured video for anyone who can't find it
;)
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
So bullshit theres profit in food retard theres profit in everything the food industry is huge. + veggies dont cure cancer. If he proven its a cure for aids then why hasnt he tried it on anyone. Im pretty sure that if someone was cured from aids it would be all over cbc or bbc. Please understand what your trying to argue before you start typing
doomsday800 in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago
The pharma co's make BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars every year from the virus of mass destruction. If the cure is as simple as healthy living and fermented papaya juice...Montagnier's suggestion....they lose out don't they? I guess you didn't bother to watch the video. Please do not complain about something you didn't take the time to watch.
If you have complaint about it you should go watch the video and leave a comment there.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Fake aids cures are dangerous and the people who make them make profits off of peoples suffering. You cant cure aids you can delay it but its not getting cured
doomsday800 in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago
He just won the Nobel Prize for "hiv"
That is LUC Montagnier in the video.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Hello? What about the BILLIONS of dollars in profit the aids drug co's make every year off of peoples' suffering?
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Ya execpt those drugs actually help delay the virus you shit juice only makes it worse
doomsday800 in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago
No they don't. ...google....
20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc.
20. Why have improvements in "virological responses" ("viral load" and CD4 counts) to HAART not translated into decreased clinical progression to AIDS and death (31)?
direct links to the studies are included in the article
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This is ONE of the studies referenced May, MT et al, 2006. "HIV treatment response and prognosis in Europe and North America in the first decade of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis", Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):427-8,
INTERPRETATION: Virological response after starting HAART improved over calendar years, but such improvement has NOT translated into a decrease in mortality.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago
aniretroviral therapy is different from veggies you fucking retard so thank you for proving my point that you can't get rid of aids. the only problem with the theropy is that alot of the people who get aids are in poorer countries and can't get access to it. That is one of the drugs or treatments you can get for aids. It helps delay the virus from completely owning your body and killing you.
doomsday800 in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NOT according to the peer reviewed scientific literature.
The meds do NOT prolong life. At all.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Well buddy aids medication is expensive and hard to find the good stuff. BTW aids drugs to help delay the HIV from spreading
doomsday800 in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NOT according to the peer reviewed scientific literature.
The meds do NOT prolong life. At all. Take it up with The Lancet if you have evidence which disproves the study.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Buddy the drugs sometimes have bad side effects but its the best you have. Your jumping all over the place like one minute you say drugs are bad the next you say they arnt pick a side and stick with it.
doomsday800 in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I if you think I ever said the drugs are not bad then you understood nothing I said
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"HIV=AIDS=DEATH is a gross error. The medical community is providing deadly drugs to positive HIV patients, that will cause certain death to them. Then, the myth will be played on, with the doctor reporting that they died from AIDS, not from the complications of these deadly drugs. The madness must stop."
— Dr. Craig Michael Uhl, MD, former U.S. Navy physician, California
Rethinkaids com quotes on aids section.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
so your going to belive what a former navy doctor says on a subject he probably knows nothing about. First you say drugs are good then you say drugs are bad. Your not a credible source of info. aniretroviral theoropy is a good way to get help slow the hiv virus but the drugs are hard to make and are very expensive and are only availible in certain places. And if you get hiv or aids you are probably going to die. No magic potion is going to cure it.
doomsday800 in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I NEVER said the drugs are good. Stop lying.
The LANCET is THE most respected science journal in the world you fool. Learn to read.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I grew up with this in the family and the ONLY people that I have seen get sick or die of "hiv" have been the people on the meds. The UNmedicated junkies have outlived the medicated health nuts.
That's why I started asking questions.
And dude...obviously it's all the same guy doing the thumbsdowning. This video has no traffic. He does this to everyone he..I mean" they disagrees with. EVERYWHERE "they" go. I knew him from these videos and then one day I thought to google his names.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here's what I've seen after growing up with this in the family...the ONLY people getting sick or dying of "hiv" have been the ones taking the meds. The UNmedicated junkies are fine.
Who the hell am I to know so many "exceptions"? In 20 years JUST exceptions actually. So one day I started asking questions
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
doomsday, are you saying you don't believe any of the drugs routinely prescribed for HIV positive people are toxic?
AZT most definitely is, to name one. When packaged for lab use, it comes with warnings that it's highly toxic, and to avoid even skin contact. The info leaflet states it attacks the bone marrow, and gives a list of symptoms of poisoning with it that reads like severe advanced AIDS
queenastilon in reply to doomsday800 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I receive money to discredit David's threat to drug company profits.
Farscape1Contact in reply to IlSeFousDeTaGuele (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
a good source that states that HTLV was the first pathogenic retrovirus discovered, in 1981, whereas the discovery of hepatits b occurred in 1963, I believe, and I seem to be getting conflicting reports as to exactly whether or not it is a retrovirus. That aside, I admit defeat in this matter. I will educate myself in this matter, and if I feel after doing so I have a worthwhile contribution to make, I will do so. In the meantime, I offer my apologies, and retract all previous statements.
thespacialone in reply to IlSeFousDeTaGuele (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I did some reading. And now I need to do some more. It seems, indeed, that HTLV is also considered by mainstream science to be a pathogenic retrovirus. I guess the reason Rasnick and Duesberg don't consider HIV pathogenic is the same reason they assume HTLV to be harmless. However, what Rasnick says about mainstream science not having been able to demonstrate other pathogenic retroviruses is not true, even if it's what he believes, and his statement is therefore entirely misleading. I have(cont)
thespacialone in reply to IlSeFousDeTaGuele (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to IlSeFousDeTaGuele (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to IlSeFousDeTaGuele (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
whom the disease was a problem and those whose bodies had overcome it. My understanding was, again from school, I am a complete layperson, that the presence of antibodies meant a disease could not return. Whilst this is certainly true for many diseases, maybe it is not true for all? Does none of you find it strange that after 25 years working on this condition and the hundreds of billions of dollars invested that researchers have been unable to produce a vaccine? The simplest explanation (cont)
thespacialone 2 years ago
contain antibodies to both but not the pathogens themselves. Having been immunised against hepatitis, presumably by blood would again contain antibodies to this virus but not the pathogen itself. Would a "sufferer" of hepatitis's body also produce antibodies? Would they be different antibodies, identifiable with an antibody test, or is there just one kind? You can see the problem: if both bodies were producing antibodies, this need not necessarily in itself distinguish between those for (cont)
thespacialone 2 years ago
FTAO: ccr5cxcr4, conotoxin, any humanshot, travian college, croakermd, nousides, raxinfull, or any other of the gang. Sirs, perhaps one of you fine fellows could enlighten me and other youtube viewers as to the rationale for the HIV antibody test. It seems I am labouring under some misapprehensions. In things like chicken pox and measles, the body starts producing antibodies when the infection has been overcome by the body. As such, having been exposed to both naturally, my blood would (cont)
thespacialone 2 years ago
To clarify, I just need to be shown that it is possible for another retrovirus to cause harm or be sexually transmitted. Such characteristics could appear in two different viruses. If David Rasnick is wrong on this matter I would certainly be surprised, but, then again, nothing much surprises me any more. You should plainly be able to see the inherent danger of making the kind of cause/effect assumptions implicit within the mainstream HIV/AIDS paradigm, but I'm not actually sure you do.
thespacialone in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All you and your cronies do is provide anecdotal evidence that many people who test HIV+ seem to die untimely deaths. Having no access to such data, I cannot claim that people within this demographic don't have shorter life expectancies, but my perfectly reasonable question is why this should be attributed to a retrovirus. To fully admit defeat, I need a single example of a retrovirus other than HIV that in clinical tests has been proven to cause physical harm, and to be transmitted sexually.
thespacialone in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Okay, then, can you inform me of any other retrovirus which has been proved to be harmful to either man or beast? Just one, give me a name for me to research. If you can do this to my satisfaction I will willingly admit defeat. Apparently, there have been some 4000 catalogued, so it shouldn't be hard.
thespacialone in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Question: did Robert Gallo not state publically that in his opinion no one knew more about retroviruses than Peter Deusberg? From "Investing the AIDS Virus" by Peter Duesberg: 'In 1946, Stanley received the first Nobel Prize ever awarded to a virologist, and two years afterward established the Virus Lab at the Berkley campus of the University of California, where he later supervised the training of Harry Rubin, Peter Duesberg, and others scientists in virus research.'
thespacialone 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why call me an idiot? Yes, I know what peer-reviewed means, yes, I know what verbatim means. It was 7 years ago. I am not claiming it is 100% correct, just close to it. If I said it was verbatim I would be lying, but it's very close. This is not a hard concept to grasp. You are very rude. You indeed are Nousides. Just so everyone knows. Please see the page of user: MyKoolAidTastesFunny for a complete list of this guy's accounts. The deepest circle of hell of reserved for deceivers and mutineers.
thespacialone in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Restate previous question: please go on the record to confirm you and Nousides are not one and the same. I'm questioning your integrity right now. And just because these "science" rags won't publish a paper doesn't mean the work is not legitimate, rather that it doesn't fit the bankrupt consensus model. The Lancet, Nature, The New Scientist publish so much that is utter drivel that Deusberg's article would have no doubt raised the tone immesurably.
thespacialone in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He did not say have unprotected sex, he did not mention protection. How you let my words get twisted. Nousides knows exactly what I said. I am not a liar, and I don't appreciate the insinuation. You are a liar, and I know this to be a fact. That is pretty much verbatim the message I got from the sexual heatlh centre, too. I doubt very much whether I am the only one to have received such advice. Maybe someone else can back up what I'm saying. I do not knowingly lie. Period. You should be ashamed.
thespacialone in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Second hand information is always problematic. More name calling I notice. Why would I expect better? Someone thinks you are the same account as Nousides. Is this true? I have just ordered Deusberg's seminal Inventing the AIDS Virus. I think it's time I did some proper reading. Perhaps you can do what Nousides was unable to, answer my questions relating to retroviruses. They are quite clearly stated, so good luck. PS, try and be a grown up and do so without resorting to playground langauge.
thespacialone in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
The message "we don't think it's necessary for you to be tested for HIV, but you can if you want" was relayed to me by both the doctor who provided the physical examination and the administrator who decided what I was going to be tested for. The only logical conclusion is they didn't want another hetro male testing negative, cause it's more evidence that their hypothesis about the cause of HIV is 100% redundant. I'm from the gay capital of the UK, the test centre completely HAS a mandate to test
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Also, stop calling me boy. You're a disrespectful little nobody. You're wrong, real world time. One in a thousand people diagnosed HIV+ in the UK. Mostly gay men, women that slept with bisexual men, and African immigrants. Like I said, he's a realist. You're not. Risk = negligible, advice well meant. Knew it wouldn't be acted upon, but to hear from a doctor that sex wasn't some thing to be afraid of was the order of the day. You lose. Again. And again, and again...
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Lol, no you didn't, you provided one source from that rag, The Lancet. You will not answer my questions because you cannot answer my questions. Btw, what's your doctorate in, shiny floors?
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Final chance. Respond to my messages of three hours previously or admit defeat. Peter Deusberg was and is acknowledged as the world's premier authority on retroviruses. He has produced peer-reviewed work that states explicitly why retroviruses cannot harm their host. How and why is he wrong? Antibodies to a disease demonstrate its defeat by the body. There are no exceptions to this rule. Yet HIV antibodies are considered evidence of illness? How is this possible? Put up or shut up.
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He's just the troll boy...google these accounts...Nousides rasnixful humanshot humanshot1 ALL the Humanshots obviously ilfousdetaguel etc etc...I have the list on my channel.
He spends ALL day on youtube pretending to be different people so "someone" will agree with him. He's also on ALL the UF student tasered videos, all over AIDS INC and is obsessed with vegans for some reason...check out the comments here too...Conflict This is the Alf
he's just some nutter
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to thespacialone (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone in reply to Nousides (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ccr5cxcr4 - Conotoxin - Humanshot - Humanshot1 -Humanshot2 -Humanshot3 - Traviancollege - CroakerMD - IlSeFousDeTaGuele - Nousides - Rasnixful - YoutubePolice - eynshamrood - nastylittlezipper - wrongfeller - daveyj60 -foogydoogydoo sickcityslicker etc etc etc
all the same guy. I have the list of his troll accounts on my channel. He spends ALLLL day on youtube pretending to be different people , posting the same crap & spamming everyone he disagrees with. Yes, it's weird and sick
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pharma shill alert...ccr5cxcr4 aka Humanshot aka Humanshot1 aka Humanshot2 aka Humanshot3 aka Rasnixful aka Nousides etc etc I have a list of his shill accounts on my channel.
Google the names ;) "They" always turn up "together" and go on spamming campaigns He's a total scientology style censorship fiend.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
twat ccrcx5 or however you want to spell your name, or is it humanshot humanshot1 humanshot2 humanshot3 croakermd lldefougaste jeez you are a troll spammer with multiple accounts and nobody likes you.
mk3stargazer in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
tx.
donkey69donkey69 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How many accounts do you use to give 'thumbs downs' to remove a dissenting opinion, ccr5cxcr4? You're a joke. Not an MD at all are you?
The Nobel Prize is issued by Big Industry shills. It has become as worthless as your diploma. Wipe your ass with it.
immayhem 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ccr5cxcr4 = Disinfo agent and spammer.
Why aren't you at work, you know, being an Internist?
immayhem in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow, 5 thumbs down in 12 minutes! Hide your tracks, quick, shill! That's a record! Don't you have people to save??
immayhem in reply to immayhem (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you make your living selling quack therapies for big pharma?
Doctors are the 3rd LEADING CAUSE of death in the US.
Deaths Causes
106,000 Non-error, negative effects of drugs
80,000 Infections in hospitals
45,000 Other errors in hospitals
12,000 Unnecessary surgery
7,000 Medication errors in hospitals
250,000 Total deaths per year from iatrogenic causes
immayhem in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
She's like the Pharmaceutical Industry then!
But don't they have the monopoly on quack therapies?
I'll bet they're pissed!
I'll bet she probably doesn't forcibly test those therapies on minority orphan children like big pharma does. i'll bet the therapies she's pushing don't kill people either...
immayhem in reply to ccr5cxcr4 (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apparently, ccr5cxcr4, the schooling one receives to become an MD is almost entirely worthless now. It's all about indoctrination into the big pharma cult. It's also arrogance training... you people are trained to stay in your little world of big-pharma-approved peer review, shunning anyone who steps outside the box. big pharma buys the patents on actual 'cures' for anything and throws it in file 13. Shame on you for your cheering of a system that is the #3 killer in the US.
immayhem in reply to immayhem (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HEY!
he's a liar! I'm not any of those people, I've never claimed to have medical training and I'm not selling anything! He just likes to project his multiple personality issues onto others.
Hit.."show spam"...He likes to spam away all dispute.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to immayhem (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I figured.
He claims to be an internist... (ER) which should mean he works 70+ hours per week peddling quackery. Not sure where one would find the time to screw around with ppl on youtube... he doesn't allow comments on his own videos (in which he likes to slam others)... i have a special abiding disgust for people like that. I guess you can tell ;)
immayhem in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He has about a dozen different accounts that I know of so that makes his claim to be an ER doctor even less believable. Most likely he's just an internet marketer with some type of science degree. I've heard that there are companies that hire people to promote their products online and it's a good way for people to help pay off student loans.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to immayhem (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No, I'm not Olivia or anyone else, I'm not selling anything and I've never claimed to have medical training at all.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 years ago
if this was true then why I have found out about it on youtube and not as a breaking news that everybody in the world talks about? this man would be a 1 million dollar Nobel prize winner for medicine research but he isn't, besides all he does is just talking and proving nothing, and do you know why? because this is BULLSHIT!
qwStyle 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One of the most difficult things to write is a refutation of a massive fraud, especially a health fraud, in the face of media control and knowledge monopolies by financial powerhouses. Making it still more difficult is the possible threat of libel lawsuits from the powerful parties essentially accused of scientific misconduct at best and criminal negligence at worst.
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to qwStyle (Show the comment) 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Joel Kauffman, PhD Organic Chemistry MIT. Emeritus Professor of Chemistry University of the Sciences in Philadelphia A specialist in exploratory drug development, he obtained grants& contracts from the US National Institutes of Health the Department of Energy, the Office of Naval Research Army Research Office& various companies Author of 80 papers on chemical and medical topics, and holder of 11 patents, including 2 on anti-tuberculosis drugs, Dr. Kauffman now works to expose fraud in medicine
mykoolaidtastesfunny in reply to mykoolaidtastesfunny (Show the comment) 2 years ago