Air cussion is expensive for me. And there is a problem of vibration. What you say about those who critisize is just like how I feel ever since I started this project. But if it is what many people will soon accept, it is already seen in every shop, every show window. What many people ignore is not always what has no value. I think my devices have values, so I try to make people think as I do. If you can, please watch my latest video/ dZD_bYZalD0 /
Thank you, I watched all. If I make presentation with any of them, I will be told in many ways. Your device touch cable. Your device makes waves and they reflect on side walls of a pool. The sole of your device is not symmetrical. When your device starts, it doesn't stand still. The effect of wind and stream ? I can't believe it does reactionless propulsion--I can make sure that there is no perfect water test in YouTube. I don't say my test is perfect. Scale test is inperfect, too.
@propulsion2010 The lowest friction you can get is the fricton with the air. Here is a solution:
/watch?v=zRYL953jmSU watch the webcite in the description
How you use that:
/watch?v=jwSCM-Ipy2Y
/watch?v=-VHqdiVUHDk
There will be no perfect test for "no-men" they will criticise even if you will get them to the Moon, cause they are all trolls or science incvisitors.
/watch?v=IaOIWXqH9Io That's a part from a BBC series "Heretic" about Eric Laithwaite...
"I want to know in which direction it accelerates. Upward or downward ?"
The direction that you choose it should move.
"Or in the direction the rotary mass is going ?"
I thought it was going in circles with different speed, i don't know what is your scheme exactly, i just guess.
Assume you put your device to a car (spaceship or boat), then start it up, the car accelerates to 40 kph, then it stops accelerating and goes at constant speed, you want to go faster, what do you do?
@TheAsatot 1.Sorry but still don't know exactly what you mean. I think it is because the force of resistance becomes bigger that any car, any ship, any train, and even truly reactionless propulsion vehicle can no longer accelerate at a certain point. But in space where there is no resistance it is only rockets and reactionless drive that can get speed and accelerate.
@TheAsatot 2.Devices you picked up containing Thornson's are the ones extracting propulsion force by lessening or strengthening centrifugal force. So their rotation axis and the proceeding direction make a right angle, but the device of this video gets propulsion force in the same direction as the rotation axis. From this, you will know my device has the different mechanism from ones you picked up.
@TheAsatot O, wait, in the same direction, i've got it, sorry. The axis of the motor rotation is the same with the direction of movement of the device, now i see.
@TheAsatot You really know much of these videos. Now I think that the best possible, if not perfect proof of reactionless propulsion (for an amateur) is to make it go on the water with the sole as symmetric as possible like my video/LEcCwq8Asuc and /hC9Df1FWV0. People absolutely doubt if there is not a little friction effect if it goes on the floor or the table or the rail, Teach me if you know an experiment on the water but Thornson's.
I was searching in the inthernet for 3 years everything about inertial and gyroscpope propusion.
Here, couple of videos with water test
/watch?v=PaiYgB4q1gs
/watch?v=ofbB3Iy5bUw&feature=related
that one looks just my first inertial propusion device)
There is one more Thornsons device by independent experementator and that's it about water tests. Really the best way to test the device is your experiment with the pivot scales, the scales have less friction then the water.
You must have seen this /watch?v=SXOKT3_SPS0&feature=related
or that /watch?v=IrJ79rZKTp4&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
or that /watch?v=op2zKfLjOV4
So if you want to accelerate (float faster) sitting in the Thornson's boat, you will fail. That boat can go only with one constant speed. The same with the Shipov device. It can not encrease speed. All such devices have a motor wich rotates a mass. If you want the WHOLE DEVICE to go faster you encrease the rate of rotation of the motor, wright?
@propulsion2010 The most common problem of the inertial propulsion devices is that when you add the RPM to the rotary mass, the device slows down, not accelerating. You showld test it. Cause if it can accelerate then it's really great scheme. If it does not, then start looking for a problem, as i did. I found common mistake in Thornson, Shipov and my own devices. And of course in the Kidd's hyroscope device.
Anyway, i am empressed with the scales experiment, i will cross my fingers for you.)
@TheAsatot I have no idea what you mean by "when you add the RPM to the rotary mass, the device slows down, not accelerating." I want to know in which direction it accelerates. Upward or downward ? Or in the direction the rotary mass is going ?
EXCELLENT!! This is one of the most convincing experiments I have seen from you. Please do more of these weight - beam tests. By doing this we can safely remove stick-slip friction effect or water-wave motion reaction effect. And since it is inside a box there is no action-reaction on sorrounding air.
@oystla Thank you for your estimate and advice. This experiment has a problem. When weight moves horizontally in the box, beam will tilt easily. Because the inside of the box keeps secret for the present, I can't show there is no such motion in it. I admit all these videos are just indirect proofs, but of cource to those with serious interest I am willing to open the boxes and show these are true devices. I don't know Peswiki, but will investigate it.
Air cussion is expensive for me. And there is a problem of vibration. What you say about those who critisize is just like how I feel ever since I started this project. But if it is what many people will soon accept, it is already seen in every shop, every show window. What many people ignore is not always what has no value. I think my devices have values, so I try to make people think as I do. If you can, please watch my latest video/ dZD_bYZalD0 /
propulsion2010 5 months ago
Thank you, I watched all. If I make presentation with any of them, I will be told in many ways. Your device touch cable. Your device makes waves and they reflect on side walls of a pool. The sole of your device is not symmetrical. When your device starts, it doesn't stand still. The effect of wind and stream ? I can't believe it does reactionless propulsion--I can make sure that there is no perfect water test in YouTube. I don't say my test is perfect. Scale test is inperfect, too.
propulsion2010 5 months ago
@propulsion2010 The lowest friction you can get is the fricton with the air. Here is a solution:
/watch?v=zRYL953jmSU watch the webcite in the description
How you use that:
/watch?v=jwSCM-Ipy2Y
/watch?v=-VHqdiVUHDk
There will be no perfect test for "no-men" they will criticise even if you will get them to the Moon, cause they are all trolls or science incvisitors.
/watch?v=IaOIWXqH9Io That's a part from a BBC series "Heretic" about Eric Laithwaite...
You must beleve in yourself.
TheAsatot 5 months ago
one more video, not much to see though, just couple of seconds in the middle of it.
/watch?v=qN94bk7hrH0
TheAsatot 5 months ago
"I want to know in which direction it accelerates. Upward or downward ?"
The direction that you choose it should move.
"Or in the direction the rotary mass is going ?"
I thought it was going in circles with different speed, i don't know what is your scheme exactly, i just guess.
Assume you put your device to a car (spaceship or boat), then start it up, the car accelerates to 40 kph, then it stops accelerating and goes at constant speed, you want to go faster, what do you do?
TheAsatot 5 months ago
@TheAsatot 1.Sorry but still don't know exactly what you mean. I think it is because the force of resistance becomes bigger that any car, any ship, any train, and even truly reactionless propulsion vehicle can no longer accelerate at a certain point. But in space where there is no resistance it is only rockets and reactionless drive that can get speed and accelerate.
propulsion2010 5 months ago
@TheAsatot 2.Devices you picked up containing Thornson's are the ones extracting propulsion force by lessening or strengthening centrifugal force. So their rotation axis and the proceeding direction make a right angle, but the device of this video gets propulsion force in the same direction as the rotation axis. From this, you will know my device has the different mechanism from ones you picked up.
propulsion2010 5 months ago
@propulsion2010 "device of this video gets propulsion force in the same direction as the rotation axis"
Like this? /watch?v=r7NPx3dRpUw&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
TheAsatot 5 months ago
@TheAsatot O, wait, in the same direction, i've got it, sorry. The axis of the motor rotation is the same with the direction of movement of the device, now i see.
TheAsatot 5 months ago
@TheAsatot You really know much of these videos. Now I think that the best possible, if not perfect proof of reactionless propulsion (for an amateur) is to make it go on the water with the sole as symmetric as possible like my video/LEcCwq8Asuc and /hC9Df1FWV0. People absolutely doubt if there is not a little friction effect if it goes on the floor or the table or the rail, Teach me if you know an experiment on the water but Thornson's.
propulsion2010 5 months ago
@propulsion2010
I was searching in the inthernet for 3 years everything about inertial and gyroscpope propusion.
Here, couple of videos with water test
/watch?v=PaiYgB4q1gs
/watch?v=ofbB3Iy5bUw&feature=related
that one looks just my first inertial propusion device)
There is one more Thornsons device by independent experementator and that's it about water tests. Really the best way to test the device is your experiment with the pivot scales, the scales have less friction then the water.
TheAsatot 5 months ago
You must have seen this /watch?v=SXOKT3_SPS0&feature=related
or that /watch?v=IrJ79rZKTp4&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
or that /watch?v=op2zKfLjOV4
So if you want to accelerate (float faster) sitting in the Thornson's boat, you will fail. That boat can go only with one constant speed. The same with the Shipov device. It can not encrease speed. All such devices have a motor wich rotates a mass. If you want the WHOLE DEVICE to go faster you encrease the rate of rotation of the motor, wright?
TheAsatot 5 months ago
Can it accelerate?
TheAsatot 5 months ago in playlist Другие видео от пользователя propulsion2010
@TheAsatot I think it can do.
propulsion2010 5 months ago
@propulsion2010 The most common problem of the inertial propulsion devices is that when you add the RPM to the rotary mass, the device slows down, not accelerating. You showld test it. Cause if it can accelerate then it's really great scheme. If it does not, then start looking for a problem, as i did. I found common mistake in Thornson, Shipov and my own devices. And of course in the Kidd's hyroscope device.
Anyway, i am empressed with the scales experiment, i will cross my fingers for you.)
TheAsatot 5 months ago
@TheAsatot I have no idea what you mean by "when you add the RPM to the rotary mass, the device slows down, not accelerating." I want to know in which direction it accelerates. Upward or downward ? Or in the direction the rotary mass is going ?
propulsion2010 5 months ago
EXCELLENT!! This is one of the most convincing experiments I have seen from you. Please do more of these weight - beam tests. By doing this we can safely remove stick-slip friction effect or water-wave motion reaction effect. And since it is inside a box there is no action-reaction on sorrounding air.
Very GOOD!
Send this one to the Peswiki dot com web.
oystla 6 months ago
@oystla Thank you for your estimate and advice. This experiment has a problem. When weight moves horizontally in the box, beam will tilt easily. Because the inside of the box keeps secret for the present, I can't show there is no such motion in it. I admit all these videos are just indirect proofs, but of cource to those with serious interest I am willing to open the boxes and show these are true devices. I don't know Peswiki, but will investigate it.
propulsion2010 6 months ago