What liberals fail to see, is that Saddam Hussein and his cronies who are now departed from this world..(peace be upon that dear old chap of theirs..Allah) They were all weapons of mass destruction. Once dead, they should of all been mixed in pig fodder, but wait, then the pigs would have had to be exorcized!!! Stick that in your Turban Allah!!!
MoscowMaestro, from that anus which sits upon your shoulders, fecal matter spews from that oriface, and yet, with the same one you eat. I think you need to refrain from anymore verbal dissertations, if, it can even be called that!
@MoscowMaestro Actually none of them even play professional baseball. Now go make buddies with Hitler before he makes war with you. And while you're at it attack Afghanistan even though they didn't attack you unlike us, and feel free to kill 20 million of your own people. And lest we forget build a nuclear reactor for that sweet Islamic republic of Iran. Get out of here Russian moron and take half your population back that are freeloaders and moochers living in my country!
@Dimaggio369 HEY FUCKTARD FREAK CUNT YANKEE. It was YOUR cunt Prescott Bush who was doing business with Hitler, CUNT. WE were in Afghanistan protecting an elected Government, CUNT. Afghanistan never attacked you, you FUCKING YANKEE MORON CUNT SHIT. NOW GET OUT OF HERE before I smash your fucking worthless teeth so far down your obese yankee gullet you're pickin' them out your fucking 600lb asshole, CUNT
@MoscowMaestro I appreciate the compliment, but I can't lie. I too do not play baseball in New York. And Unfortunately I've been to Europe numerous times, but certainly wouldn't want to stay there. Russians don't want to stay there either. You fools flock here as much as any 3rd world country and live off welfare. A bunch of liberal pussies. There is a reason America has won more olympic medals than the 2nd ,3rd and 4th most countries combined. You couldn't even handle Japan ya pussy.
@Dimaggio369 Prescott Bush worked for a company that sold products to Germany in the 30's before they invaded any other countries. Your country tried to kiss his butt after he invaded other countries until he invaded yours. Of course your piece of crap country was worse and took over more countries than the Nazi's and would have taken over far more if we didn't stop yer nasty slavic selves. You tried to take over Afghanistan like you did Uzbekistan, Georgia, poland...Now go wait 2 hours for food
@Dimaggio369 MORE FUCKING YANKEE CUNT LIES. RUSSIA NEVER HAD ANY CONTACT WITH CUNT YANKEE SCUM PRESCOTT FUCKING CUNT BUSH, GRANDFATHER OF PRESIDENT GEORGE H BUSH. NOW FUCK OFF AND DIE YOU CUNT FREAK NAZI SCUM.
@MoscowMaestro I can confirm that after the events of September 11, 2001, and up to the military operation in Iraq, Russian special services and Russian intelligence several times received ... information that official organs of Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist acts on the territory of the United States and beyond its borders, at U.S. military and civilian locations," Vlad Putin. hahaha read it and weep Commie! He never played for the New York Yankees!
@MoscowMaestro Well I've managed to figure out why so many retarded Commie Russians keep leaving Russia. Look how dumb they are. That was a quote from vladimir putin you idiot. If you knew how to read you'd see that I said that moron as you seem to think only baseball players from new york said that retard. I am very proud of you big boy you've learned cunt and fucktard. What is the count on number of times you've said them now? Wish I was grown up like you Commie.
@MoscowMaestro Russia was good buddies with the Nazi's until Hitler turned and started kicking your butt. We should have let him have your pussy country. You killed 20 million of your own people anyway.Now hurry, get in line for food now and you may get some cheese by midnight. At least we didn't have to build a wall to keep our people in! hahaha
@Dimaggio369 NO DANGER OF A LARDASS CUNT LIKE YOU JOINING A FOOD LINE EH, CUNTTARD YANKEE ASSHOLE??? KEEP MUNCHING THAT 8LB BAG OF DONUTS YOU LARDASS CUNT FREAK. BY THE WAY YOU HAVE BUILT A WALL ON THE TEXAS BORDER, CUNT!!!! ROFL!!! AND ANOTHER IN YOUR PUPPET STATE OF ISRAEL, FUCKTARD!!!!
@MoscowMaestro What a genius. Yes we are building a wall along the Texas border to keep people from coming in, not our people from going out you retard. Unlike you guys who have to build a wall to keep people in. We can afford food unlike you. And yes we are so fat we have won more olympic medals then the next 3 best countries combined you retard hahaha. And I will bet any amount of money you want that I have less body fat than you. Wonder why no Americans are sneaking into Russia? now go Stalin
@MoscowMaestro Getting a little butt sore are ya commie boy? Evrybody looks fat next to your country that can't feed it's people. Now beat it loser. Jealousy is a bitter pill so I understand why you're on American channels.
@MoscowMaestro Last Russian heavyweight champ? haha good one huh? Bunch of pussies. Oh and Europe hates you idiot. That's why NATO was invented. So you couldn't do to western Europe what you did to Eastern Europe imperialist Stalinist pig.
@MoscowMaestro - You're so indoctrinated you're BEYOND stupid. You can't even be correct on accident.
You murdered more of your own citizens than the number of people killed by the US in every war it has ever fought. And that was just your Soviet, atheist Empire's work in the Winter of 1933.
You're so fucking brain dead you're defending the worst people in human history. You're so fucking stupid you can't even understand that never at a time in America were millions starving to death.
@thomaserossi HEY FUCKTARD CUNT. YOU LEAVE ANY MORE MESSAGES ON MY PAGE, CUNT - AND I'LL COME ROUND AND CUT YOUR HANDS OFF WITH A CHAINSAW. YOU READING ME, NIGGER???
Does anyone actually argue that Congress is not equally - or more - responsible for the horrific waste of time, money, energy and human life that is the Iraq War? Why is this video even necessary, as no one disputes the history of how we got here... Republicans said most of the same stuff...
You're so brainwashed & retarded that I don't know how you put on your own socks & underwear. No kidding ~ your level of stupidity is fk'ing insane. Virtually everything you post is completely back-asswards from the truth.
@2010GOP Republicans created NAFTA as I have proved. YOU proved that it was a majority of republicans who passed nafta. Bush created it, republicans passed it. Democrats were the majority voting to protect American jobs. republicans voted to outsource American jobs and Democrats were the majority who voted to protect American jobs. As a worker I must support the ones who did the most for workers on the day of the NAFTA vote. That was Democrats. Go FUCK yourself, republican traitor.
@2010GOP You won't even utter the words that NAFTA is republican...even though I threw the FACTS in your dirty face....you are so blindly hypnotized by republican anti-American propaganda that you hate your own fucking country...you seditious mother fucking commie republican freak!!!!!!!!!
"Three government officials met in 1992 to discuss a free trade agreement. Those officials were President George H. W. Bush of the U.S., Carlos Salinas of Mexico & Brian Mulroney of Canada. These officials essentially came to an agreement together, which left it to each respective country’s legislative branch. After re-negotiations after a change in both the Canadian government and a change in the U.S. president, Bill Clinton. All 3 sides agreed on a free trade agreement"
@2010GOP I proved that Bush created it....when you said Clinton did. I proved that you are a hypnotized lying piece of shit republican traitor to America. Go right ahead, keep digging yourself in deeper, making yourself look like an even bigger jackass. The point to all of this is that republicans originated the concept of outsourcing our jobs by giving corporations incentive to do so, through the republican bill NAFTA. republicans did that, not Democrats. Therefore workers vote Democratic.
@JetMechMA: As I've proven w/every in-depth historical account of NAFTA, Bush Sr only agreed. The actual legislation came from Clinton & his Administration. If not for the majority of Democrats voting for it ... and without Clinton's signature on it, NAFTA wouldn't exist.
And Clinton talked up NAFTA & praised it immensely. Where's your anger on that again? Oh, that's right ~ you're a Pussy-Boy w/partisan blinders on. Never mind.
@2010GOP I'm not talking about that piece of shit Clinton, I'm talking about the republicans who created NAFTA, pushed it through Congress, and the majority of people voting to outsource the jobs being republican. YOU yourself proved that the majority of people voting to outsource YOUR job, were your republican representatives....yet you still support them. The depth of your insanity is beyond words. You have yet to admit that you have been a fool for supporting the outsourcing of your own job.
@2010GOP The majority supporting NAFTA were republicans. Why do you support outsourcing? republicans push outsourcing in general. They want to FIRE you and give that job to a communist Chinese slave. The communist Chinese use that money to train their troops to kill Americans...how can you support republican funding the communist Chinese? Use your head, we're talking about the preponderance of the evidence. republicans are more involved in outsourcing than Democrats. Hold them responsible.
@2010GOP That's a GOD DAMNED FUCKING LIE. republicans created nafta and were the first to sign it and pushed it through congress. The majority supporting NAFTA were republicans. NAFTA and also outsourcing to communist China is a REPUBLICAN thing as I have proved for any reader to see. You are a GOD damned filthy fucking lying republican traitor to your own country. You're a fucking traitor to America you piece fo shit.
@2010GOP: The actual legislation came from Clinton & his Administration.
JM: That's a God damned filthy republican seditious lie. Clinton only added protections for labor, Clinton did not create NAFTA. bush sr created NAFTA and signed it with the other two presidents as YOU yourself have finally admitted to. You are a God damned liar for saying that Clinton created NAFTA. Bush sr created NAFTA before Clinton was anywhere in sight. Majority of GOP passed it.
JM: Clinton is not the majority of Democrats. The majority of republicans created NAFTA and they voted to pass NAFTA. The majoriity of those voting against NAFTA were Democrats. Why haven't I heard you praise the Democrats who fought to protect your job? It's because your are hopelessly brainwashed to support your GOP cult. Who am I going to vote for, the republicans who worked to outsource my job? I gotta go with the ones who voted against outsourcing.
@2010GOP Further more, you're a GOD DAMNED fool for voting republican because republicans are your bitter fucking enemy....dumbass ! ! ! !!!!!!! I don't give a FUCK about you.....but you are dragging the rest of us down with you. Get with it.
Republicans create jobs ... Republicans don't try to regulate every aspect of my life ... Republicans don't want to tax me to death.
You prefer Democrats who destroy jobs, impose any tax or "fee" imaginable, and tell you how to wipe your ass. I suppose pussies like that.
By the way, you brought up illegals & yet never responded: How do you like the leader of Democrats saying being illegal isn't a "crime" ... and Democrats voting to give them welfare?
@2010GOP I've proven what a fool you are for voting republican. You are uneducable.....but you are dragging the rest of us down with you. If a bloody revolution breaks out in this country because of republican treasons, you've chosen the wrong side my friend.
@2010GOP: Republicans don't want to tax me to death.
JM: No, they want to outsource your job entirely. Dumbass, at least with Democrats you HAVE a job. Look what 8 years of failed republican policies brought us.....economic RUIN. It will be known as "The Lost Decade". How many decades do you have to throw away supporting failed republican policies?
@JetMechMA: As every in-depth historical account states, Bush Sr only agreed. Clinton & his Admin drafted the legislation & presented it to Congress. It takes a special kind of retard to believe leaders from another country actually drafted it.
Democrats were the majority when NAFTA passed -- they made it happen
Clinton sold it. - "NAFTA means jobs .. and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement" - "Clinton horse traded for votes on NAFTA"
@2010GOP: As every in-depth historical account states, Bush Sr only agreed.
JM: That's what I said and you tried to deny that bush sr created NAFTA. republicans created NAFTA. NAFTA is a republican policy. You tried to deny that. You're a liar. A bald faced liar. You said that Democrats were the majority when NAFTA passed, in an attempt to make it seem as if the Democrats passed NAFTA. That's a GOD damned bald faced lie. Republicans created and passed NAFTA as any reader can see.
@2010GOP What the fuck is wrong with you? We're talking about NAFTA because it is a bad thing for America, you are cornered. I expressed my concerns with Clinton for stabbing us in the back. NAFTA kills jobs in America and I proved that republicans created it and passed it.....you haven't said squat SHIT about republicans creating and passing NAFTA. That's because you are a God damned brainwashed republican jackass, that's why. That makes you a fucking traitor to America buddy.
@JetMechMA: "(Republicans) want to outsource your job entirely".
Sorry, dippy ~ facts prove you wrong once more. You must live under a rock:
LOWEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATES = Conservative states
LOWEST WELFARE RATES per capita = Conservative states
MOST FORTUNE 500 & 1000 COMPANIES = Conservative state
Lastly, go back to middle-school & learn that the power is with Congress. It is they who create the policies & control the spending. Who controlled Congress the last 4 years? Oh yea ~ Democrats
@2010GOP: Who controlled Congress the last 4 years? Oh yea ~ Democrats
JM: GOP had the congress for 6 years and bush for 8. At the end of those 8 years, 6 of them with an all republican majority government, the country was left in a smoldering ruins. What the FUCK is wrong with you, assHOLE ????????
@JetMechMA "Dumbass, at least with Democrats you HAVE a job." Yeah, only if you're able to suck ass and get a union /govt gig where you have to PAY "DONATIONS" TO DEMOCRATS TO KEEP PAYING YOU FROM THE GOVT TEAT.
For Republicans, every day is July 4th. For Democrats, EVERY DAY IS APRIL 15th.
Look at the dates of these speeches. Outdated material. Weapons inspectors TOLD the bush cabal that there were no more WMD in Iraq...and they were RIGHT!!!!!!! Anyone who would take these statements out of context this badly, in order to support the war crimes committed by the bush cabal, is a seditious traitor to the United States.
@JetMechMA: LOL .. Are you angry because you're learning how brainwashed & stupid you've been all this time? What you're hearing is the position of Democrats even before Bush was in office & reiterating the same after 9/11
And no Dummy, go read the reports from UNSCOM & UNMOVIC ... you're clueless. Bush didn't "lie" about anything. Bush's approval rating skyrocketed & Democrats had to figure out a way to lower it. They relied on ignorant people to buy their bullshit, like you for example.
@2010GOP: ten years before bush was in office Saddam DID have WMD. Weapons inspectors DESTROYED them....and they TOLD the bush cabal this was the case.....AND THEY WERE RIGHT!!!!!!!
You're a mother fucking communist republican seditious traitor to America...mother fucking lying traitor scum republican. Fuck YOU!!!!!!!!!!! republicans fund explosive growth in communist China with jobs outsourced from America. You mother fucker. Guess what, the revolution ain't gonna be outsourced.
10 yrs before? LOL! Forget Clinton's military strikes 24 months before Bush took office for not complying w/inspections? Saddam was still not complying afterward leading Democrats to again push for action after 9/11.
You were fed horseshit & bought it. That's why Pelosi called for investigation of Weiner & not Bush -- Democrats would be exposed for the liars they are. Congrats, fk'tard
@2010GOP You brainwashed asshole. My God, you've been brainwashed to hate your own country. You do mental gymnastics to defend your republican cult, while I defend America. You are a seditious, communist, republican traitor to America. You're a piece of shit.
@JetMechMA: I read your comments on other videos. You're an Obama ass-kisser! LMAO. How's it feel knowing your hero is about to engage the US in a 4th war? Or that of the 1,503 US Troop deaths in Afghanistan, 933 are under Obama?
Republicans are communists? Wow... you're clearly fk'd in the head. No wonder you're an Obama fan. I'll stay in my Conservative state, you can plant your ass in a shit-hole Liberal area
Your hero is FAILURE & a CLOWN ... the country laughs at you Pussy Boy
JM: The US has BEEN in a fourth war since bush started missile attacks in Pakistan. The war in Pakistan has been going since bush. Where the hell have you been?
Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya & now Yemen. Can you count to 4, retard? And no, Obama pushed deeper into Pakistan & increased the use of drones, killing a record number of civilians. Not to mention the record number of US troop deaths in Afghanistan under Obama.
Jobs outsourced? Who signed NAFTA, dipshit? By the way, most of the jobs you're seeing disappear from the high-tax Liberal shit-hole you live in are relocating to business-friendly low tax Conservative states.
JM: NAFTA was created by bush sr, first signed by bush sr....introduced as a bill in Congress by republicans and the majority who voted to pass NAFTA were republicans, while the majority voting against NAFTA were Democrats. Look it up.
It was fairly even: 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats passed it in the House, it passed the Senate 61-38. Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats.
"NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement." - Bill Clinton
YOU WROTE: "First signed by Bush, Sr". That's wrong, asshat. He never signed any binding legislation.
YOU WROTE: "Introduced as a bill by Republicans". Wrong again, Dipshit. "Clinton introduced clauses in the legislation before sending it to the US Senate".
YOU WROTE: "The majority who voted to pass NAFTA were republicans". It's called Bi-partisan, dummy. Democrats controlled both Houses at the time -- 60% of the Senate Democrats voted "yea"
@2010GOP: I TOLD you to look it up, dumbass. You're just embarrassing yourself with each new dumbass reply. Bush sr sat down with the presidents of Canada and Mexico and signed the NAFTA agreement which went on to get the approval of each country's congress before being signed by Clinton. All you did was prove me right again when you said that the majority of those voting to pass NAFTA were republicans while the majority of those voting against it were Democrats.
@2010GOP I bet your head exploded when you looked it up and finally realized that you voted for the very republicans who outsourced your job....fucken dumbass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU'VE BEEN BRAINWASHED TO HATE YOUR OWN COUNTRY.......DIRTY LOUSY FILTHY ROTTEN COMMUNIST REPUBLICAN TRAITOR TO AMERICA!!!!!!!!
JM: Republicans created NAFTA, introduced it as a bill in Congress and voted to pass it. The majority of those voting to outsource the jobs are republicans. The majority of those voting against outsourcing the jobs are Democrats. As a working class person, who you going to vote for? The answer is... Democrats do more for the working man than republicans. You're out of your fucking mind to vote for your own bitter enemies in Congress, the republicans
@JetMechMA: Scroll down & read my comment again --- I know your brain is a little on the slow side.
I clearly said, Bush Sr did not sign any "binding legislation". It was CLINTON who signed it, putting it in motion. How strange that you've yet to blame him.
"Democrats do more for the working man" <--- LOL! Do you have any idea how damn dumb you are?
Who wants to pass legislation admitting your electric/heating bill skyrocket (up to 300%)? Tax for "naughty" behavior? Even fk'ing cow farts
@2010GOP ANSWER the question COWARD! republiscum created NAFTA, introduced it as a bill in Congress, and the majority of those voting ot pass NAFTA were republicans,...we've established that.... so who you gonna vote for as a working class person? You miserable coward...answer the question!!!!!!!!
"President George H.W. Bush signed an agreement (not legislation) for ceremonial purposes only. The agreement had to be ratified by each nation's legislative branch. President Bill Clinton formulated the legislation and introduced it to the U.S. Senate. The legislation passed both House of Congress with majority votes from each party".
Speaking of "Cowards" -- you still haven't answered. Why no anger at Clinton, pussy-boy?
@2010GOP: President Bill Clinton formulated the legislation and introduced it to the U.S. Senate.
JM: That's a bald faced lie. You are certifiably insane. I accept your surrender on the facts. republicans are traitors to America who outsource the jobs...and you are a hypnotized republican cult zombie. You've lost your fucking mind. And you never did answer the question. I'll answer it for you...a working class person votes Democrat you stupid mother fucker.
UVA, Miller Center, Washington DC: "President Clinton and key members of his administration worked tirelessly on the legislation to assuage fears by inserting clauses and inserting the North American Development Bank to assist development along the Mexican border and show sympathy with the concerns of Hispanic Representatives. Clinton was convinced long-term prosperity depended on free trade between nations. NAFTA amounted to an administration victory"
@2010GOP CLINTON DIDN'T CREATE NAFTA, REPUBLICANS DID. CLINTON DIDN'T INTRODUCE NAFTA AS A BILL IN CONGRESS, REPUBLICANS DID. THE MAJORITY OF THOSE VOTING TO PASS NAFTA WEREN'T DEMOCRATS, THEY WERE REPUBLICANS. THE MAJORITY OF THOSE VOTING AGAINST NAFTA WERE DEMOCRATS. CLINTON IS NOT THE ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, BUT THE MAJORITY OF REPUBLICANS VOTING TO PASS NAFTA .....DOES REPRESENT...THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. YOU STILL HAVEN'T ANSWERED THE QUESTION, WITH THAT IN MIND...WHO YOU VOTING FOR?
Bush Sr made an informal agreement -- Clinton & his Administration formulated the actual legislation & presented it to the Senate. Majorities in both parties supported. Those are facts, get over it
Democrats cause the outsourcing to red states and other countries with their excess taxes & regulations. You have no understanding of the US Constitution & must be a Pussy who thinks "Govt" always knows what's best
@2010GOP: Bush Sr made an informal agreement -- Clinton & his Administration formulated the actual legislation & presented it to the Senate.
JM: You admit here that republicans created NAFTA...so...we've established that you are a liar on that much. Now anyone can look up the record on NAFTA and see that it was sponsored as a bill in Congress by republicans. And we've already established that the majority voting to outsource the jobs were republicans. You just dig yourself in deeper.
@JetMechMA: If you really believe the original talks of NAFTA were w/Republicans & Bush Sr exclusively, you're even more retarded than I first thought. Anyone can review virtually any historical data & clearly see that. Clinton & his Admin created the legislation & had it signed before he was in office for a year. Read Clinton's comments regarding NAFTA ... he was all about that shit. But it's more fun to say "Bush's fault", isn't it? That's what your tiny brain has been trained to do.
@JetMechMA: Lastly, go take a 2nd grade math class. There was a higher "number" of Republicans because they were the majority at the time. As anyone over the age of 11 would understand, that doesn't negate the fact that the MAJORITY of Democrats supported. Seriously ~ did you make it through middle-school math class?
@2010GOP: There was a higher "number" of Republicans because they were the majority at the time.
JM: So you admit that republicans created and passed NAFTA. Thank you. It was like pulling teeth getting you to admit that republicans are traitors to America. Thanks for finally admitting it.
a) UVA, Miller Center on NAFTA. Clinton & his Admin created the legislation.
b) 34 Republicans voted yes .... it would not have passed w/out those 27 Democrats. Return to 3rd grade math class.
c) Where's your anger again on Clinton formulating the legislation, presenting it to the Senate, signing it, and promoting it as a great piece of legislation? I seem to keep missing that post
d) Conservatives - Constitution loving Patriots. As most know, Liberals = Worthless Filth
@2010GOP Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it. In the U.S., Bush, who had worked to "fast track" the signing
@2010GOP Clinton introduced clauses to protect American workers. On September 18, 1992, President Bush officially notified the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate, in accordance with the 90-day notice requirement under section 1103(a)(1) of the 1988 Act, of his intent to enter into a NAFTA with the Governments of Mexico and Canada. On December 17, 1992, President Bush, President Salinas, and Prime Minister Mulroney signed the NAFTA.
@2010GOP the implementing legislation was introduced as H.R. 3450 in the House on November 4, by Mr. Rostenkowski (as designee of the Democrat Majority Leader) for himself and Mr. Archer ( designee of the Republican Minority Leader), (JM: This is a simple procedural action which must be carried out by request of the ones introducing the bill in Congress...the republicans. Bush sr created it, signed it, and the republicans pushed it through Congress, the majority of republicans passed NAFTA.
@2010GOP Clinton did not formulate it, did not create it...thats a bald faced lie as I have proven here. Clinton introduced protections for labor into the anti-American trade agreement, thats all. Why should I have anger against Clinton for introducing protections for labor? You're a jackass.
@2010GOP Clinton didn't create NAFTA or introduce it as bill in Congress. Clinton got protectiions for US workers put into the republican bill. He didn't support it until protections for US workers. Where were the mother fucking republicans when it came to protections for US workers you stupid God damned mother fucker? When it came time to vote on NAFTA, the majority of those voting to pass NAFTA were republicans. The majority of those voting to protect American jobs were Democrats.
@JetMechMA: AMAZING IGNORANCE. Only uneducated "workers" vote Democrat. How fk'ing stupid are you exactly? Most "workers" who actually have "jobs" are in Red states.
Do you whack off at the thought of Democrats sitting around thinking of another way to take money from you, such as w/"indirect" tax? They know many of their supporters are uneducated, like you. They laugh at you behind your back
Tell your Democrat leaders to keep "outsourcing" those jobs to Red states, we appreciate it;)
@2010GOP Democrats don't have shit to do with outsourcing....republican business owners do. I proved to you that outsourcing is a republican thing, and you still vote republican. You are stark raving insane and you are a danger to America because you are a fucking communist republican traitor to America who supports funding explosive growth in communist China with jobs outsourced from America. If we were soldiers in WW2, you would be fragged for endangering your own troops.
@2010GOP Oh by the way, stupid mother fucking idiot republican, NAFTA doesn't have anything to do with republican support for communist China. NAFTA stands for NORTH AMERICAN Free Trade....dumbass ! ! ! !!!!!!
@JetMechMA: Oh ~ and to answer you question, I'm evaluating all Republican candidates & their positions. That's what smart people do, unlike you who bought into that Hopey Changey Horseshit.
However, I am leaning towards Rick Perry. You know, the Governor of Texas who created nearly 1/2 of all jobs in this country, balanced the budget, maintained a business-friendly environment, all while keeping some of the lowest taxes in the nation.
Will be a comedy show watching Obama debate him. LOL!
@2010GOP LOL....Rick Perry and who....Palin?.....Bachman? Yeah sure.....God bless Palin and Bachman....a gift from God to the Democrat candidates. The philosopher Voltaire once said, "I have made but one prayer to God, 'make my enemies ridiculous', and God granted it." Thanks for the laugh.
@JetMechMA: Perry/Rubio 2012 .. helluva ticket. Bachmann is very qualified for a cabinet position. You know, someone w/2 degrees, along w/business experience, understands the US Constitution, etc.
You keep laughing Pussy .. the country has awakened. Where were you just a few months ago when Democrats lost their ass?: Senate seats, 63 House seats losing the majority, majority of Governorships, and 600+ state legislative seats across the country. Maybe one day you'll grow up & grow a brain
@2010GOP The true American patriots will rise up against you communist Chinese republican traitors to your own country. You won't outsource the fucking revolution. You better import enough illegal alien labor to do your fighting for you. You republicans are good at bringing illegals into America for cheap labor. Right here in this thread you have bragged about underrcutting your fellow Americans with illegal aliens. You dirty lousy rotten filthy republican traitor to America.
@JetMechMA: Illegals? You, as a Liberal, are retarded enough to bring up illegals?
The other day, the leader of the Democratic Nat'l Cmte said, "Republicans think illegals being here is a crime. They just want to ship them all back". Here you go: /watch?v=asJNCKLoLNA
Obama/Democrats - refuse to protect the border; suing AZ
Obama claimed Republicans want a moat w/alligators at the border
Democrats vote to give Illegals welfare, and cheat to do it: /watch?v=N5Dul5hyoBA&feature=related
JM: Dirty lousy rotten filthy scum communist republicans fund explosive growth in communist China with jobs outsourced from America. republicans DECIMATE America with outsourcing. republicans fund explosive growth in communist China instead of in America. Keep your communist made shit over in your communist China motherland, would you. Communist republican traitors to your own country.
JM: AFTER Sept 11th, BUSH controlled the fucking intelligence.....he LIED about the WMD. Weapons inspectors TOLD the bush cabal that saddam no longer possessed WMD....and they were RIGHT ! ! ! !!!!! CIA testified under oath that there was no credible evidence that Iraq had any ties to anti-American terrorism in over a decade. YOU MASS MURDERED INNOCENT IRAQIS YOU FUCKING MONSTER ! ! !
The congressional vote on attacking Iraq was based on false intelligence put out by the bush cabal. bush lied to the congress and they based their vote on that. It's one thing to tell congress that Saddam has WMD, but after you mass murder hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis, you better be right. Bush is a mass murdering war criminal who lied us into attacking Iraq and mass murdering hundreds of thousands of totally innocent Iraqis. bush should be tried for treason and sentenced to death.
I gladly say today merely against the democratic party you guys invaded Libya with the joke of doing nothing more than removing a dictator. And I'm still waiting for my war protest young angry liberals. No did not think so. Muhahahahah.
@NAGGERNUTZ Eight years after Iraq, in a country over 1,000 miles away (Tunisia), protests against the government in the midst of a global economic recession, all happened because they see "Democracy flourishing in Iraq"? Why not credit the fall of the Berlin Wall while you're at it?
@BI30 - Tell me something I don't know. Bush was STILL right. Sorry it chafes your ass, but it's true.
Bush said "once democracy is established in Iraq, it will spread throughout the region". It's happening right now. Maybe Iraq didn't have anything to do with it, but it's STILL happening... so... BUSH WAS RIGHT.
@NAGGERNUTZ If you credit Carter with the fall of the Berlin Wall, then your argument holds. But in fact, these protests *are taking place in Iraq right now too*. Bush's argument was that the sight of a flourishing Democracy in Iraq would encourage people in other nations to follow suit wanting the same thing. If "Iraq" is the reason why these nations are protesting, why is *Iraq* protesting? Because they've seen how good Democracy is? Democracy is not "flourishing" in Iraq. Bush was WRONG.
@BI30 - Stop spinning. Nobody said anything about democracy flourishing. The protests in Iraq have nothing to do with democracy. The protests are over corruption, unemployment, the lack of basic services and restrictions on freedom of expression (CNN April 8, 2011). They're protesting just like any other democracy. Iraqi's are able to elect their own representatives for the first time in history... and it's spreading throughout the region, just as Bush said it would. BUSH WAS RIGHT.
@NAGGERNUTZ I'm not sure you read your own words as you type. "No one said anything about Democracy Flourishing"? Google the phrase along with the words "President Bush" and tell me what you get (I direct you to January of 2007). You are absolutely CORRECT that the protests in Iraq are jobs, corruption and lack of services. But THAT is why they are/were protesting in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and everywhere else. NOT because they've been enticed by what they see happening in Iraq.
@BI30 - I'm not real sure you get it either. You see, facts are funny things. They are what they are. They are the truth. Spin whatever reason you want... whatever makes you sleep better. The fact remains, Bush said that once democracy was established in Iraq, it would spread throughout the region. And guess what? It's by your own admission spreading throughout the region. Do you hate democracy or what? Or is it the fact that Bush said it and you hate Bush? Bush was right.
@NAGGERNUTZ This is insanity. You are ACTUALLY trying to argue that "Democracy in Iraq"... such that it is, and put in place nearly five years ago... is the sudden impetus for the protests currently going on in Egypt and the surrounding region NOW. And when you concede that the people in Iraq are protesting as well, Iraq somehow exists in a vacuum, unrelated to events in those other countries. Explain to me exactly HOW Iraq is the basis of these protests?
@BI30 - I'm not arguing anything, you are. You're getting off subject, my friend. The subject is... and it was my initial comment that you replied to...
"George Bush said that once democracy was established in Iraq, it would spread throughout the region". Guess what? It's spreading throughout the region. Syria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and there's even unrest in Qatar, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Stop trying to get off on a hissy tangent. Put your pants on and man up or stop responding. Simple.
@NAGGERNUTZ I asked one simple question and you couldn't answer it. "How is Iraq influencing these protests?"
The fact these protests are taking place years after Bush made his claim, doesn't mean Iraq is the influence behind them. Bush said Democracy in Iraq "would spread throughout the region", meaning other nations would follow Iraq's lead. Just because nations are currently protesting in no proof they have anything to do with Iraq. You can't say "Bush was right" simply because of sequence.
@BI30 - Wow... unbelievable. If I say it's going to snow tomorrow... and it does snow, could you say I was right? Pretty simple. I'm sorry if all the middle eastern countries didn't collapse the next day after Iraq did. In the real world, 5 years is nothing. I know you hate George Bush, but the man made a prediction and it came true. Now go away. If you can't handle the truth, then don't reply to peoples' comments. Maybe these other countries want to be able to elect their own representatives?
@NAGGERNUTZ Let me put it this way: If I told someone "If I put this Welcome Mat on my doorstep, someone will knock on my door." Two years later, my landlord knocks on my door asking why I haven't paid my rent.
Was I right? Was my putting that doormat out responsible for "someone" knocking on my door two years later for a totally unrelated reason?
@BI30 - OMG!!! Are you serious? No wait... you're paranoid schizophrenic, right? Look, It's obvious that you're a rabid, liberal Bush hater. Fine. Hate away. But what the man said was correct. Do you suppose Bush was privy to intel that you and I aren't? Do you think it's possible that Bush knew ahead of time that these countries would be doing what they're doing now? Do you think maybe Obama knows too? Has the CIA ever conspired to take down a foreign government? Go away please.
@NAGGERNUTZ You are REALLY grasping at straws now, suggesting that you/Bush were right because "maybe" Bush had some intel six years ago that foresaw what would happen in 2011?
You don't get it. Your "snow prediction" example lacked any "cause & effect". Bush might as well have said, "If I snap my fingers, Democracy will eventually break out in the Middle East". Just because something happens, doesn't prove "cause & effect".
Clearly, you have no knowledge of WHAT sparked these recent protests.
@BI30 - Are you back again? No more welcome mat stories? If Obama had said the same thing, you'd be singing his praises. Now, for the forth time... please... go away.
@BI30 - Only if he snapped his fingers and it happened. You aren't too stable are you? You seem to be digging like crazy to find any way to discredit George Bush. Actually, having Bush back in the white house right about now, would be a godsend. There is NOTHING that George Bush did that Obama hasn't. Jimmy Carter was our worst president ever, but he's in second place now.
@NAGGERNUTZ Just establishing your level of intellectual (dis)honesty. By that same standard, I can say with absolute authority that aliens will land on the White House lawn, scientists will find a cure for cancer, and the island of Japan will sink into the ocean.
All three statements meet your criteria of 1) I said it. 2) No time frame, so if it takes a billion years, I predicted it, ergo, 3) I am right.
BTW: Check your math on Carter. Both Bushes and Ford created fewer jobs... COMBINED.
@BI30 - Well, I guess it's better to be right and not know it, than to know it and argue to the contrary. Congratulations.
You are good for a daily laugh though.
There are 52 people who were held hostage in Iran for 444 days by Islamic extremists... and released exactly 20 minutes after Ronald Reagan was sworn in, that might disagree with you on Carter. That's all the math I need to know on Carter. Did I mention gas lines that stretched for miles?
@NAGGERNUTZ Since I'm old enough to remember Carter (and Ford), I'd remind you that the gas lines began under Ford. They returned during the Russian oil embargo in response to their aiding Iran. Waiting until Regan was sworn in was Iran's "slap in the face" to Carter. So unless you are on the side of Iran here, I don't think the timing of the hostages release is a criticism of Carter.
But I've already established your level of intellectual (dis)honesty. By YOUR standards, YES, Bush "was right".
@BI30 - I'm not only old enough to remember them, I'm old enough to have actually been able to wipe my own ass at the time... unless you're not telling the truth about your age... which is quite possible considering how you've nit picked and spun every fact so far. The gas lines started under Carter. I know because I was actually driving at the time and sat in the gas lines. Oh, so Carter was such a great president that's why our hostages rotted for 444 days? Weakness is good? I get it now.
@NAGGERNUTZ I'm not about to get into another absurd side argument with you over something easily provable by a Google search. And a Bush apologist such as yourself certainly shouldn't start criticizing presidents over their ability to "get the job done" within a respectable amount of time.
@BI30 - Your entire dialog has been a side argument. Why stop now? I'm sensing some anger. I never apologized for Bush. I merely stated a fact. Sorry if democracy didn't come to the middle east the day after Bush made the statement. Kind-of a lame argument, but then again, what else is new?
@NAGGERNUTZ I never strayed from the topic. I probably shouldn't have said "apologist" since you clearly believe he has nothing to apologize for, Fine. Absurd. But fine.
The "timing" of "Democracy breaking out" in Northern Africa today is... by your own admission... irrelevant since (by your own admission) Bush had nothing to do with it, and cause & effect is irrelevant.
And I wouldn't be quoting 1Cor13:11, since you clearly haven't yet reached stage two.
@BI30 - Oh how your comment just drips with hypocrisy! You can't get past Bush, when Obama has done or is doing the very same. Obama has as much to apologize for in just 2 years compared to Bush's 8 years. Otherwise explain what Bush did that Obama hasn't.
I never said Bush had anything to do with democracy "breaking out"... you did. I merely stated that Bush said that after democracy is established in Iraq, it would spread throughout the region, which it did. So... again, Bush was right.
@NAGGERNUTZ You'll have to point out my hypocrisy, because I never once mentioned Obama.
You "never said Bush had anything to do with democracy 'breaking out'", and in the same sentence conclude "after democracy is established in Iraq, it would spread throughout the region, which it did. So... again, Bush was right."
The fact that you can't see you are trying to credit Bush for the current protests makes this a pointless argument.
@BI30 - OMG!!! Your hypocrisy is NOT MENTIONING OBAMA! You bash Bush, while letting Obama off the hook for doing the very same things Bush did. I'm now convinced that you're not mentally stable.
"The fact that you can't see you are trying to credit Bush for the current protests makes this a pointless argument." If it's a pointless argument, then why did you start this dialog? There's some more hypocrisy. hypocrisy.
@NAGGERNUTZ You're assuming I'm an Obama supporter simply because I'm a Democrat. That's a Republican thing. Republicans believe you must agree 100% with everything the GOP does or else call yourself "an Independent". I'm an adult. I can still call myself a Democrat w/o agreeing with everything my Party does.
You should probably buy yourself a dictionary and look up the word "hypocrisy". I never defended Obama for doing the things Bush did. I'm not surprised you can't tell the difference.
@BI30 - uh huh... just a troll. You got yourself into something that you can't get yourself out of, so now you're running for the hills. You get credit for at least finally admitting that Obama isn't worth arguing over. You lose points for jumping on Bush. There's the hypocrisy. I wonder if 2 years ago you were singing the same tune.
@NAGGERNUTZ Clearly, you can't carry on a discussion w/o devolving into juvenile ad hominem attacks. I'm not "running for the hills" by refusing to defend Obama simply because you believe that's the job of anyone that calls themselves a Democrat.
You claim to be older than me, but every one of your posts so far has been a childish example of pathetic name calling.
@BI30 - From the very first reply that you made to my simple, but true statement, I've given you the opportunity to go away. YOU chose to attack me for making a simple statement that YOU just couldn't handle. All because you just can't stand that George Bush said something that came true. YOU chose to perpetuate this, not me. Out of 10,300 viewers of this video, YOU were the only one that attacked me for my statement. Now YOU can't handle what you got back. Grow up or stop attacking people.
@NAGGERNUTZ You've called me a child while lobbing childish names at me. You accused me of "running away" while begging me to leave. And pointing out a fallacy is not an "attack".
But we can conclude this quickly if you answer this simple question:
In your initial comment, when you said "Bush was right", where you praising his psychic powers or what a lucky guesser he was? You've already conceded it wasn't for his actions in Iraq.
@BI30 - Was I praising his psychic powers or what a lucky guesser he was? Are you kidding? Bush made a simple, but true statement. Tell me, why does it matter so much to you? My guess is, you're a hater. You simply can't handle the fact that he was right... wild guess or psychic power. You hate George Bush, you hate conservatives. I read your channel page. Now put your big boy pants on... man up... accept the facts. Go away or keep perpetuating your hate. Now I'VE exposed liberal hypocrisy.
If no one were saying "Bush was wrong", there'd be no need to proclaim "Bush was right" There can be only three reasons: a) You are praising his psychic abilities to foresee the future, b) You are commenting on his amazing guessing skills, or c) You believe current events vindicate him.
A & B are both nonsense, and you concede it's not C. Either you are a liar or an idiot (or likely both.)
@BI30 - Your hate propels you on huh? You keep asking me questions, but you refuse to answer mine. What does it matter? In reality, it doesn't. It's all about your hate. You boldly state it on your channel page.
I'm either a liar or an idiot? Let's break this down... I made a simple, but true statement. George Bush made a simple statement that proved true (those pesky facts on current events again). I guess in your liberal, hating, mind if you can't handle the truth it's got to be a lie?
@NAGGERNUTZ What does it matter? When you first posted "Bush was right", you were trying to credit him for current events. When I called you on it, you denied it and came up with this bizarre "Because it happened, it's true" nonsense defense. Trying to get a Conservative ideologue to acknowledge their own nonsense is like trying to train a dog to play piano. Mea culpa.
@BI30 - What's even worse, is some liberal moonbat is posting our dialog on an obscure little amateurish web site. I feel honored. It's amazing how the libtards will take such a simple statement and run with it. The only problem is, nobody will ever get the chance to read it. I have to go... CNN and MSNBC will no doubt be trying to contact me for an interview. Hey, tell me, you probably knock down a few hundred thousand a week on ad sales alone, huh? Woo hoo and the custom artwork is awesome!
@BI30 - Awe, now there you go... calling me names. That wouldn't be another example of your hypocrisy, would it? I've waited all day and I haven't heard from CNN or MSNBC yet... but I still have hope. How much did it cost for that custom artwork? Was it expensive? You're still gonna post this aren't you? I'd hate for this dialog to go unseen. Oh, wait... nobody will see it anyway! Uh oh... the phones ringing... maybe it's the Huffington Post!
@NAGGERNUTZ@NAGGERNUTZ Sorry if you don't like "moonbat trolls" calling you names. Call the waaaambulance.
Congratulations on figuring out how to visit my profile and click on my homepage. I'm (not) surprised it took you as long as it did. You clearly think you have an audience here cheering you on. You should be thrilled I posted your comments someplace where people (100 a week) will actually see it.
Thank you for the compliment on my artwork. Yes, I do get paid for it.
@BI30 - Oh to the contrary. I enjoy how wingnuts always break down to name calling when they get bested. Nothing new here. So stop whining.
Now let's address the next lie. 100 hits a week? Please don't make me laugh. You're lucky to get one hit a week and that's by accident... exactly the way I found your little gem web site. I found it by doing a Google for George Bush's true statement... I found your little rant. I've built enough web sites to know you started the counter at 76,100.
@NAGGERNUTZ Actually, I've been doing my blog since the 2004 election. The counter started at zero. And if you revisit each Monday, you can witness the number of hits (assuming you can count.)
And if you review the thread, the first "name" was lobbed by you. I too enjoy how Wingnuts break down into name-calling when they lack an intelligent response. Thanks for letting me know why you did so.
@BI30 - The first rule about holes: When you're in one, stop digging. Let me see if I can break this down a little further. 5 days ago, I saw your site for the first time. Yesterday, the counter still hadn't advanced, with the exception of one, which was me. Yesterday, I brought it to your attention and lo and behold, over night the counter advances 116 hits! Amazing! So.... either liberals only read your site one day a week, or, you're manipulating the counter AFTER I brought it up!!! Liar.
@NAGGERNUTZ You are indeed a sad little man. The number of hit naturally drops off towards the end of the week as I only post a WEEKLY Op/Ed on Mondays. The majority of my hits occur on the first days of publication, which in this case is Sunday night thru Tuesday morning.
@BI30 - Hey, here's some further proof that you're a liar. The time line of our dialog, that YOU published on your web site, proves you a liar. Yep, if I were you, I'd only publish the good stuff too...NOT. You're not only a liar, you're not even good at it. Pathetic. And the funniest part of it... I didn't have to do a thing to prove it... YOU did it yourself! I can't stop laughing.
@BI30 - OMG!!! Without THINKING, you again prove that you're lying! You might want to stop now. You've already destroyed any semblance of honesty. Remember the first rule of holes? You're way below ground level now. Hey, keep trying, you might hit OIL!
@BI30 - Hey! Why did you stop posting this? I'm disappointed. I checked your web site (of course the page counter hasn't advanced in three days now), so there blows the 100 hits a day lie. How much you wanna bet, in a month, if I go back, the counter will be the same? Come on, a serious newsman on a big time libtard web site can't let himself get flustered, like you're obviously doing now. Don't feel bad, you just broke a little sooner than most. Most moonbats take a little longer to break.
@NAGGERNUTZ Once I post my Op/Ed's, the story is over. To quote you: "Nothing new here." And repeatedly whining about me "whining" (which I have not done) seems to be par for the course with you... calling me names then whining about me calling you names, begging me to "go away" while accusing me of "running away", et al.
As for my counter not advancing, there have been 96 hits in 24 hours. The count was 76,112 when posted Sunday night.
So, where's your "big time website"? I didn't think so.
@BI30 - Oh, I see... only cover the game until half-time. You wouldn't want your readers to see the game turn around would you? Sad, very sad. But I digress. It's your web site and you are a liberal, so reporting only half of the story and cherry picking what you do report is expected. You must spend hours writing content... but wait... it only took me 5 minutes to read the entire web site. So if you started the site in 2004, it's taken 7 years to get to where you are? One lie leads to another.
@BI30 - Well gee, let me see. Most journalists wait till a dialog or debate is over before publishing ANYTHING. Now that you're being exposed as the liar that you obviously are, you end the report? Please tell me what school of journalism that you flunked out of? Also, where did you learn web design? Because damned if I can find 296 articles. If I can't find them, nobody else can. But wait, you lied before, could this be another lie? You're not only a liar, you're a fraud too.
@NAGGERNUTZ One thing I noticed long ago was the more a Republicans' argument falls apart, the more Replies they post in response to every answer. You were already posting two responses for every one of my comments. When I reply to both, it grows to three. Sad. And I *did* wait until "the debate was over". You just don't realize it.
Need help finding those older posts? Scroll to the bottom and click "Older entries", OR use the calendar at the top of the screen. Not too difficult.
@BI30 - Wow! By your own words... I'VE begged you to go away. But you keep coming back. So I guess that further proves that you're desperate to find something... anything... that you can use to save face, otherwise, you'd have been gone days ago. Yep, keep coming back. Doesn't it suck when your own words come back to haunt you? I'm not perpetuating anything... YOU ARE. One lie leads to another. I guess you haven't learned that lesson yet. I'll take you to school.
What liberals fail to see, is that Saddam Hussein and his cronies who are now departed from this world..(peace be upon that dear old chap of theirs..Allah) They were all weapons of mass destruction. Once dead, they should of all been mixed in pig fodder, but wait, then the pigs would have had to be exorcized!!! Stick that in your Turban Allah!!!
Demelza12345 3 months ago
MoscowMaestro, from that anus which sits upon your shoulders, fecal matter spews from that oriface, and yet, with the same one you eat. I think you need to refrain from anymore verbal dissertations, if, it can even be called that!
Demelza12345 3 months ago
Ron Paul is the only peace candidate. Ron Paul 2012.
canaanav 4 months ago
@canaanav RP is a pussy.
MrSavagerocks 3 months ago
They're ALL yanks, they're ALL scum,. they're all stinking YANKEE liars!! Fucking scum!! Fucking yankee scum!!!
MoscowMaestro 4 months ago
@MoscowMaestro Actually none of them even play professional baseball. Now go make buddies with Hitler before he makes war with you. And while you're at it attack Afghanistan even though they didn't attack you unlike us, and feel free to kill 20 million of your own people. And lest we forget build a nuclear reactor for that sweet Islamic republic of Iran. Get out of here Russian moron and take half your population back that are freeloaders and moochers living in my country!
Dimaggio369 3 months ago
@Dimaggio369 HEY FUCKTARD FREAK CUNT YANKEE. It was YOUR cunt Prescott Bush who was doing business with Hitler, CUNT. WE were in Afghanistan protecting an elected Government, CUNT. Afghanistan never attacked you, you FUCKING YANKEE MORON CUNT SHIT. NOW GET OUT OF HERE before I smash your fucking worthless teeth so far down your obese yankee gullet you're pickin' them out your fucking 600lb asshole, CUNT
MoscowMaestro 3 months ago
@MoscowMaestro I appreciate the compliment, but I can't lie. I too do not play baseball in New York. And Unfortunately I've been to Europe numerous times, but certainly wouldn't want to stay there. Russians don't want to stay there either. You fools flock here as much as any 3rd world country and live off welfare. A bunch of liberal pussies. There is a reason America has won more olympic medals than the 2nd ,3rd and 4th most countries combined. You couldn't even handle Japan ya pussy.
Dimaggio369 3 months ago
@Dimaggio369 Prescott Bush worked for a company that sold products to Germany in the 30's before they invaded any other countries. Your country tried to kiss his butt after he invaded other countries until he invaded yours. Of course your piece of crap country was worse and took over more countries than the Nazi's and would have taken over far more if we didn't stop yer nasty slavic selves. You tried to take over Afghanistan like you did Uzbekistan, Georgia, poland...Now go wait 2 hours for food
Dimaggio369 3 months ago
@Dimaggio369 MORE FUCKING YANKEE CUNT LIES. RUSSIA NEVER HAD ANY CONTACT WITH CUNT YANKEE SCUM PRESCOTT FUCKING CUNT BUSH, GRANDFATHER OF PRESIDENT GEORGE H BUSH. NOW FUCK OFF AND DIE YOU CUNT FREAK NAZI SCUM.
MoscowMaestro 3 months ago
@MoscowMaestro I can confirm that after the events of September 11, 2001, and up to the military operation in Iraq, Russian special services and Russian intelligence several times received ... information that official organs of Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist acts on the territory of the United States and beyond its borders, at U.S. military and civilian locations," Vlad Putin. hahaha read it and weep Commie! He never played for the New York Yankees!
Dimaggio369 3 months ago
@Dimaggio369 DOES YOUR MOMMY KNOW YOU'RE PLAYING ON THE INTERNET, FUCKTARD?? HEY, YOU'D BETTER GET BACK TO YOUR JOB DELIVERING PIZZA, FUCKTARD!!!
MoscowMaestro 3 months ago
@Dimaggio369 YOU CAN CONFIRM????? WELL WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU, LITTLE CUNT?? WHAT DO YOU KNOW???
FIND THE WMD AND GET BACK TO US, YANKEE SCUM!!!! YOU'RE A FUCKING LIAR, YOUR WHOLE NATION ARE GUTLESS CUNT SCUM LIARS!!!!
NO WMD!!!! YOU'RE LAUGHABLE!!!
ROFL!!!!!
MoscowMaestro 3 months ago
@MoscowMaestro Well I've managed to figure out why so many retarded Commie Russians keep leaving Russia. Look how dumb they are. That was a quote from vladimir putin you idiot. If you knew how to read you'd see that I said that moron as you seem to think only baseball players from new york said that retard. I am very proud of you big boy you've learned cunt and fucktard. What is the count on number of times you've said them now? Wish I was grown up like you Commie.
Dimaggio369 3 months ago
@Dimaggio369 FUCK OFF AND DIE OF OBESITY, YOU 600LB FUCKTARD NAZI SCUM
MoscowMaestro 3 months ago
@MoscowMaestro Russia was good buddies with the Nazi's until Hitler turned and started kicking your butt. We should have let him have your pussy country. You killed 20 million of your own people anyway.Now hurry, get in line for food now and you may get some cheese by midnight. At least we didn't have to build a wall to keep our people in! hahaha
Dimaggio369 3 months ago
@Dimaggio369 NO DANGER OF A LARDASS CUNT LIKE YOU JOINING A FOOD LINE EH, CUNTTARD YANKEE ASSHOLE??? KEEP MUNCHING THAT 8LB BAG OF DONUTS YOU LARDASS CUNT FREAK. BY THE WAY YOU HAVE BUILT A WALL ON THE TEXAS BORDER, CUNT!!!! ROFL!!! AND ANOTHER IN YOUR PUPPET STATE OF ISRAEL, FUCKTARD!!!!
MoscowMaestro 3 months ago
@MoscowMaestro What a genius. Yes we are building a wall along the Texas border to keep people from coming in, not our people from going out you retard. Unlike you guys who have to build a wall to keep people in. We can afford food unlike you. And yes we are so fat we have won more olympic medals then the next 3 best countries combined you retard hahaha. And I will bet any amount of money you want that I have less body fat than you. Wonder why no Americans are sneaking into Russia? now go Stalin
Dimaggio369 3 months ago
@Dimaggio369 I TOLD YOU TO FUCK OFF AND DIE, LARDASS. LEARN TO TAKE ORDERS, YANKEE CUNT.
MoscowMaestro 3 months ago
@MoscowMaestro Getting a little butt sore are ya commie boy? Evrybody looks fat next to your country that can't feed it's people. Now beat it loser. Jealousy is a bitter pill so I understand why you're on American channels.
Dimaggio369 3 months ago
@Dimaggio369 BLOW IT OUT YOUR 600LB ASSHOLE, YANKEE CUNT
MoscowMaestro 3 months ago
@MoscowMaestro Last Russian heavyweight champ? haha good one huh? Bunch of pussies. Oh and Europe hates you idiot. That's why NATO was invented. So you couldn't do to western Europe what you did to Eastern Europe imperialist Stalinist pig.
Dimaggio369 3 months ago
@MoscowMaestro - You're so indoctrinated you're BEYOND stupid. You can't even be correct on accident.
You murdered more of your own citizens than the number of people killed by the US in every war it has ever fought. And that was just your Soviet, atheist Empire's work in the Winter of 1933.
You're so fucking brain dead you're defending the worst people in human history. You're so fucking stupid you can't even understand that never at a time in America were millions starving to death.
thomaserossi 3 months ago
@thomaserossi HEY FUCKTARD CUNT. YOU LEAVE ANY MORE MESSAGES ON MY PAGE, CUNT - AND I'LL COME ROUND AND CUT YOUR HANDS OFF WITH A CHAINSAW. YOU READING ME, NIGGER???
MoscowMaestro 3 months ago
"we know they have weapons of mass destruction"-because we still have the bill of sale.-bill hicks
dhebert111 4 months ago
Does anyone actually argue that Congress is not equally - or more - responsible for the horrific waste of time, money, energy and human life that is the Iraq War? Why is this video even necessary, as no one disputes the history of how we got here... Republicans said most of the same stuff...
mike2lane 4 months ago
You're so brainwashed & retarded that I don't know how you put on your own socks & underwear. No kidding ~ your level of stupidity is fk'ing insane. Virtually everything you post is completely back-asswards from the truth.
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP Republicans created NAFTA as I have proved. YOU proved that it was a majority of republicans who passed nafta. Bush created it, republicans passed it. Democrats were the majority voting to protect American jobs. republicans voted to outsource American jobs and Democrats were the majority who voted to protect American jobs. As a worker I must support the ones who did the most for workers on the day of the NAFTA vote. That was Democrats. Go FUCK yourself, republican traitor.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP You won't even utter the words that NAFTA is republican...even though I threw the FACTS in your dirty face....you are so blindly hypnotized by republican anti-American propaganda that you hate your own fucking country...you seditious mother fucking commie republican freak!!!!!!!!!
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA:
"Three government officials met in 1992 to discuss a free trade agreement. Those officials were President George H. W. Bush of the U.S., Carlos Salinas of Mexico & Brian Mulroney of Canada. These officials essentially came to an agreement together, which left it to each respective country’s legislative branch. After re-negotiations after a change in both the Canadian government and a change in the U.S. president, Bill Clinton. All 3 sides agreed on a free trade agreement"
2010GOP 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: Are you able to identify those context clues, Corky?
..officials essentially came to an agreement together, WHICH LEFT IT TO each respective country’s LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
AFTER RE-NEGOTIATIONS after a change in Government (with) BILL CLINTON, all 3 sides AGREED ON A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
Don't hurt your head too much, retard...
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP I proved that Bush created it....when you said Clinton did. I proved that you are a hypnotized lying piece of shit republican traitor to America. Go right ahead, keep digging yourself in deeper, making yourself look like an even bigger jackass. The point to all of this is that republicans originated the concept of outsourcing our jobs by giving corporations incentive to do so, through the republican bill NAFTA. republicans did that, not Democrats. Therefore workers vote Democratic.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: As I've proven w/every in-depth historical account of NAFTA, Bush Sr only agreed. The actual legislation came from Clinton & his Administration. If not for the majority of Democrats voting for it ... and without Clinton's signature on it, NAFTA wouldn't exist.
And Clinton talked up NAFTA & praised it immensely. Where's your anger on that again? Oh, that's right ~ you're a Pussy-Boy w/partisan blinders on. Never mind.
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP I'm not talking about that piece of shit Clinton, I'm talking about the republicans who created NAFTA, pushed it through Congress, and the majority of people voting to outsource the jobs being republican. YOU yourself proved that the majority of people voting to outsource YOUR job, were your republican representatives....yet you still support them. The depth of your insanity is beyond words. You have yet to admit that you have been a fool for supporting the outsourcing of your own job.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP The majority supporting NAFTA were republicans. Why do you support outsourcing? republicans push outsourcing in general. They want to FIRE you and give that job to a communist Chinese slave. The communist Chinese use that money to train their troops to kill Americans...how can you support republican funding the communist Chinese? Use your head, we're talking about the preponderance of the evidence. republicans are more involved in outsourcing than Democrats. Hold them responsible.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP That's a GOD DAMNED FUCKING LIE. republicans created nafta and were the first to sign it and pushed it through congress. The majority supporting NAFTA were republicans. NAFTA and also outsourcing to communist China is a REPUBLICAN thing as I have proved for any reader to see. You are a GOD damned filthy fucking lying republican traitor to your own country. You're a fucking traitor to America you piece fo shit.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP: The actual legislation came from Clinton & his Administration.
JM: That's a God damned filthy republican seditious lie. Clinton only added protections for labor, Clinton did not create NAFTA. bush sr created NAFTA and signed it with the other two presidents as YOU yourself have finally admitted to. You are a God damned liar for saying that Clinton created NAFTA. Bush sr created NAFTA before Clinton was anywhere in sight. Majority of GOP passed it.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP: And Clinton talked up NAFTA
JM: Clinton is not the majority of Democrats. The majority of republicans created NAFTA and they voted to pass NAFTA. The majoriity of those voting against NAFTA were Democrats. Why haven't I heard you praise the Democrats who fought to protect your job? It's because your are hopelessly brainwashed to support your GOP cult. Who am I going to vote for, the republicans who worked to outsource my job? I gotta go with the ones who voted against outsourcing.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP Further more, you're a GOD DAMNED fool for voting republican because republicans are your bitter fucking enemy....dumbass ! ! ! !!!!!!! I don't give a FUCK about you.....but you are dragging the rest of us down with you. Get with it.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: LOL ... you're the FOOL.
Republicans create jobs ... Republicans don't try to regulate every aspect of my life ... Republicans don't want to tax me to death.
You prefer Democrats who destroy jobs, impose any tax or "fee" imaginable, and tell you how to wipe your ass. I suppose pussies like that.
By the way, you brought up illegals & yet never responded: How do you like the leader of Democrats saying being illegal isn't a "crime" ... and Democrats voting to give them welfare?
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP I've proven what a fool you are for voting republican. You are uneducable.....but you are dragging the rest of us down with you. If a bloody revolution breaks out in this country because of republican treasons, you've chosen the wrong side my friend.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP When unions were at their peak of membership, it was during the 1950's. The era we refer to as,
"The Fabulous '50's."
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP: Republicans don't want to tax me to death.
JM: No, they want to outsource your job entirely. Dumbass, at least with Democrats you HAVE a job. Look what 8 years of failed republican policies brought us.....economic RUIN. It will be known as "The Lost Decade". How many decades do you have to throw away supporting failed republican policies?
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: As every in-depth historical account states, Bush Sr only agreed. Clinton & his Admin drafted the legislation & presented it to Congress. It takes a special kind of retard to believe leaders from another country actually drafted it.
Democrats were the majority when NAFTA passed -- they made it happen
Clinton sold it. - "NAFTA means jobs .. and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement" - "Clinton horse traded for votes on NAFTA"
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: As every in-depth historical account states, Bush Sr only agreed.
JM: That's what I said and you tried to deny that bush sr created NAFTA. republicans created NAFTA. NAFTA is a republican policy. You tried to deny that. You're a liar. A bald faced liar. You said that Democrats were the majority when NAFTA passed, in an attempt to make it seem as if the Democrats passed NAFTA. That's a GOD damned bald faced lie. Republicans created and passed NAFTA as any reader can see.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP What the fuck is wrong with you? We're talking about NAFTA because it is a bad thing for America, you are cornered. I expressed my concerns with Clinton for stabbing us in the back. NAFTA kills jobs in America and I proved that republicans created it and passed it.....you haven't said squat SHIT about republicans creating and passing NAFTA. That's because you are a God damned brainwashed republican jackass, that's why. That makes you a fucking traitor to America buddy.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: "(Republicans) want to outsource your job entirely".
Sorry, dippy ~ facts prove you wrong once more. You must live under a rock:
LOWEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATES = Conservative states
LOWEST WELFARE RATES per capita = Conservative states
MOST FORTUNE 500 & 1000 COMPANIES = Conservative state
Lastly, go back to middle-school & learn that the power is with Congress. It is they who create the policies & control the spending. Who controlled Congress the last 4 years? Oh yea ~ Democrats
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: Who controlled Congress the last 4 years? Oh yea ~ Democrats
JM: GOP had the congress for 6 years and bush for 8. At the end of those 8 years, 6 of them with an all republican majority government, the country was left in a smoldering ruins. What the FUCK is wrong with you, assHOLE ????????
JetMechMA 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2010GOP Why haven't I heard you praise the Democrats who fought to protect your job?
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA "Dumbass, at least with Democrats you HAVE a job." Yeah, only if you're able to suck ass and get a union /govt gig where you have to PAY "DONATIONS" TO DEMOCRATS TO KEEP PAYING YOU FROM THE GOVT TEAT.
For Republicans, every day is July 4th. For Democrats, EVERY DAY IS APRIL 15th.
jpeditor 6 months ago
@jpeditor You sure told me.
JetMechMA 6 months ago
Look at the dates of these speeches. Outdated material. Weapons inspectors TOLD the bush cabal that there were no more WMD in Iraq...and they were RIGHT!!!!!!! Anyone who would take these statements out of context this badly, in order to support the war crimes committed by the bush cabal, is a seditious traitor to the United States.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: LOL .. Are you angry because you're learning how brainwashed & stupid you've been all this time? What you're hearing is the position of Democrats even before Bush was in office & reiterating the same after 9/11
And no Dummy, go read the reports from UNSCOM & UNMOVIC ... you're clueless. Bush didn't "lie" about anything. Bush's approval rating skyrocketed & Democrats had to figure out a way to lower it. They relied on ignorant people to buy their bullshit, like you for example.
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: ten years before bush was in office Saddam DID have WMD. Weapons inspectors DESTROYED them....and they TOLD the bush cabal this was the case.....AND THEY WERE RIGHT!!!!!!!
You're a mother fucking communist republican seditious traitor to America...mother fucking lying traitor scum republican. Fuck YOU!!!!!!!!!!! republicans fund explosive growth in communist China with jobs outsourced from America. You mother fucker. Guess what, the revolution ain't gonna be outsourced.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: LOL ... typical uneducated Liberal.
Want the UN reports MSNBC didn't fill you in on?
10 yrs before? LOL! Forget Clinton's military strikes 24 months before Bush took office for not complying w/inspections? Saddam was still not complying afterward leading Democrats to again push for action after 9/11.
You were fed horseshit & bought it. That's why Pelosi called for investigation of Weiner & not Bush -- Democrats would be exposed for the liars they are. Congrats, fk'tard
2010GOP 7 months ago 2
@2010GOP You brainwashed asshole. My God, you've been brainwashed to hate your own country. You do mental gymnastics to defend your republican cult, while I defend America. You are a seditious, communist, republican traitor to America. You're a piece of shit.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: I read your comments on other videos. You're an Obama ass-kisser! LMAO. How's it feel knowing your hero is about to engage the US in a 4th war? Or that of the 1,503 US Troop deaths in Afghanistan, 933 are under Obama?
Republicans are communists? Wow... you're clearly fk'd in the head. No wonder you're an Obama fan. I'll stay in my Conservative state, you can plant your ass in a shit-hole Liberal area
Your hero is FAILURE & a CLOWN ... the country laughs at you Pussy Boy
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: to engage the US in a 4th war?
JM: The US has BEEN in a fourth war since bush started missile attacks in Pakistan. The war in Pakistan has been going since bush. Where the hell have you been?
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: Hey Dumbf-ck!
Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya & now Yemen. Can you count to 4, retard? And no, Obama pushed deeper into Pakistan & increased the use of drones, killing a record number of civilians. Not to mention the record number of US troop deaths in Afghanistan under Obama.
Jobs outsourced? Who signed NAFTA, dipshit? By the way, most of the jobs you're seeing disappear from the high-tax Liberal shit-hole you live in are relocating to business-friendly low tax Conservative states.
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: Who signed NAFTA
JM: NAFTA was created by bush sr, first signed by bush sr....introduced as a bill in Congress by republicans and the majority who voted to pass NAFTA were republicans, while the majority voting against NAFTA were Democrats. Look it up.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: WRONG again.
It was fairly even: 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats passed it in the House, it passed the Senate 61-38. Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats.
"NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement." - Bill Clinton
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP Thanks for proving me right and you wrong.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA:
YOU WROTE: "First signed by Bush, Sr". That's wrong, asshat. He never signed any binding legislation.
YOU WROTE: "Introduced as a bill by Republicans". Wrong again, Dipshit. "Clinton introduced clauses in the legislation before sending it to the US Senate".
YOU WROTE: "The majority who voted to pass NAFTA were republicans". It's called Bi-partisan, dummy. Democrats controlled both Houses at the time -- 60% of the Senate Democrats voted "yea"
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: I TOLD you to look it up, dumbass. You're just embarrassing yourself with each new dumbass reply. Bush sr sat down with the presidents of Canada and Mexico and signed the NAFTA agreement which went on to get the approval of each country's congress before being signed by Clinton. All you did was prove me right again when you said that the majority of those voting to pass NAFTA were republicans while the majority of those voting against it were Democrats.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP I bet your head exploded when you looked it up and finally realized that you voted for the very republicans who outsourced your job....fucken dumbass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU'VE BEEN BRAINWASHED TO HATE YOUR OWN COUNTRY.......DIRTY LOUSY FILTHY ROTTEN COMMUNIST REPUBLICAN TRAITOR TO AMERICA!!!!!!!!
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: LOL!! What a fking dumbass you are.
Bush Sr's signature did nothing. Clinton's signature is what actually put it in effect; and Clinton supported it 100%. But you still blame "Bush".
Democrats controlled Congress when NAFTA was signed; the majority of Democrats voted "Yes" for NAFTA. But you still blame "Republicans".
And sorry ass-hat. Millions of jobs have moved away from Libtard states to Conservative states.
You're nothing but a hopeless little tard ... LOL
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: Bush Sr's signature did nothing.
JM: Republicans created NAFTA, introduced it as a bill in Congress and voted to pass it. The majority of those voting to outsource the jobs are republicans. The majority of those voting against outsourcing the jobs are Democrats. As a working class person, who you going to vote for? The answer is... Democrats do more for the working man than republicans. You're out of your fucking mind to vote for your own bitter enemies in Congress, the republicans
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP: Bush Sr's signature did nothing.
JM: Oh, so now we've gone from bush didn't sign it to "Bush Sr's signature did nothing." ASSHOLE ! ! !
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: Scroll down & read my comment again --- I know your brain is a little on the slow side.
I clearly said, Bush Sr did not sign any "binding legislation". It was CLINTON who signed it, putting it in motion. How strange that you've yet to blame him.
"Democrats do more for the working man" <--- LOL! Do you have any idea how damn dumb you are?
Who wants to pass legislation admitting your electric/heating bill skyrocket (up to 300%)? Tax for "naughty" behavior? Even fk'ing cow farts
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP ANSWER the question COWARD! republiscum created NAFTA, introduced it as a bill in Congress, and the majority of those voting ot pass NAFTA were republicans,...we've established that.... so who you gonna vote for as a working class person? You miserable coward...answer the question!!!!!!!!
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: WRONG again, dipshit.
"President George H.W. Bush signed an agreement (not legislation) for ceremonial purposes only. The agreement had to be ratified by each nation's legislative branch. President Bill Clinton formulated the legislation and introduced it to the U.S. Senate. The legislation passed both House of Congress with majority votes from each party".
Speaking of "Cowards" -- you still haven't answered. Why no anger at Clinton, pussy-boy?
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: President Bill Clinton formulated the legislation and introduced it to the U.S. Senate.
JM: That's a bald faced lie. You are certifiably insane. I accept your surrender on the facts. republicans are traitors to America who outsource the jobs...and you are a hypnotized republican cult zombie. You've lost your fucking mind. And you never did answer the question. I'll answer it for you...a working class person votes Democrat you stupid mother fucker.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: DIPSHIT.
UVA, Miller Center, Washington DC: "President Clinton and key members of his administration worked tirelessly on the legislation to assuage fears by inserting clauses and inserting the North American Development Bank to assist development along the Mexican border and show sympathy with the concerns of Hispanic Representatives. Clinton was convinced long-term prosperity depended on free trade between nations. NAFTA amounted to an administration victory"
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP CLINTON DIDN'T CREATE NAFTA, REPUBLICANS DID. CLINTON DIDN'T INTRODUCE NAFTA AS A BILL IN CONGRESS, REPUBLICANS DID. THE MAJORITY OF THOSE VOTING TO PASS NAFTA WEREN'T DEMOCRATS, THEY WERE REPUBLICANS. THE MAJORITY OF THOSE VOTING AGAINST NAFTA WERE DEMOCRATS. CLINTON IS NOT THE ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, BUT THE MAJORITY OF REPUBLICANS VOTING TO PASS NAFTA .....DOES REPRESENT...THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. YOU STILL HAVEN'T ANSWERED THE QUESTION, WITH THAT IN MIND...WHO YOU VOTING FOR?
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA
Bush Sr made an informal agreement -- Clinton & his Administration formulated the actual legislation & presented it to the Senate. Majorities in both parties supported. Those are facts, get over it
Democrats cause the outsourcing to red states and other countries with their excess taxes & regulations. You have no understanding of the US Constitution & must be a Pussy who thinks "Govt" always knows what's best
Conservatives = 40% of Americans & growing
Liberals = 21% & shrinking
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: Bush Sr made an informal agreement -- Clinton & his Administration formulated the actual legislation & presented it to the Senate.
JM: You admit here that republicans created NAFTA...so...we've established that you are a liar on that much. Now anyone can look up the record on NAFTA and see that it was sponsored as a bill in Congress by republicans. And we've already established that the majority voting to outsource the jobs were republicans. You just dig yourself in deeper.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: If you really believe the original talks of NAFTA were w/Republicans & Bush Sr exclusively, you're even more retarded than I first thought. Anyone can review virtually any historical data & clearly see that. Clinton & his Admin created the legislation & had it signed before he was in office for a year. Read Clinton's comments regarding NAFTA ... he was all about that shit. But it's more fun to say "Bush's fault", isn't it? That's what your tiny brain has been trained to do.
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: Clinton & his Admin created the legislation
JM: You are a God damned bald faced liar.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: Lastly, go take a 2nd grade math class. There was a higher "number" of Republicans because they were the majority at the time. As anyone over the age of 11 would understand, that doesn't negate the fact that the MAJORITY of Democrats supported. Seriously ~ did you make it through middle-school math class?
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: There was a higher "number" of Republicans because they were the majority at the time.
JM: So you admit that republicans created and passed NAFTA. Thank you. It was like pulling teeth getting you to admit that republicans are traitors to America. Thanks for finally admitting it.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA:
a) UVA, Miller Center on NAFTA. Clinton & his Admin created the legislation.
b) 34 Republicans voted yes .... it would not have passed w/out those 27 Democrats. Return to 3rd grade math class.
c) Where's your anger again on Clinton formulating the legislation, presenting it to the Senate, signing it, and promoting it as a great piece of legislation? I seem to keep missing that post
d) Conservatives - Constitution loving Patriots. As most know, Liberals = Worthless Filth
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it. In the U.S., Bush, who had worked to "fast track" the signing
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP Clinton introduced clauses to protect American workers. On September 18, 1992, President Bush officially notified the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate, in accordance with the 90-day notice requirement under section 1103(a)(1) of the 1988 Act, of his intent to enter into a NAFTA with the Governments of Mexico and Canada. On December 17, 1992, President Bush, President Salinas, and Prime Minister Mulroney signed the NAFTA.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP the implementing legislation was introduced as H.R. 3450 in the House on November 4, by Mr. Rostenkowski (as designee of the Democrat Majority Leader) for himself and Mr. Archer ( designee of the Republican Minority Leader), (JM: This is a simple procedural action which must be carried out by request of the ones introducing the bill in Congress...the republicans. Bush sr created it, signed it, and the republicans pushed it through Congress, the majority of republicans passed NAFTA.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP Clinton did not formulate it, did not create it...thats a bald faced lie as I have proven here. Clinton introduced protections for labor into the anti-American trade agreement, thats all. Why should I have anger against Clinton for introducing protections for labor? You're a jackass.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP Clinton didn't create NAFTA or introduce it as bill in Congress. Clinton got protectiions for US workers put into the republican bill. He didn't support it until protections for US workers. Where were the mother fucking republicans when it came to protections for US workers you stupid God damned mother fucker? When it came time to vote on NAFTA, the majority of those voting to pass NAFTA were republicans. The majority of those voting to protect American jobs were Democrats.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: AMAZING IGNORANCE. Only uneducated "workers" vote Democrat. How fk'ing stupid are you exactly? Most "workers" who actually have "jobs" are in Red states.
Do you whack off at the thought of Democrats sitting around thinking of another way to take money from you, such as w/"indirect" tax? They know many of their supporters are uneducated, like you. They laugh at you behind your back
Tell your Democrat leaders to keep "outsourcing" those jobs to Red states, we appreciate it;)
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP Democrats don't have shit to do with outsourcing....republican business owners do. I proved to you that outsourcing is a republican thing, and you still vote republican. You are stark raving insane and you are a danger to America because you are a fucking communist republican traitor to America who supports funding explosive growth in communist China with jobs outsourced from America. If we were soldiers in WW2, you would be fragged for endangering your own troops.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP Oh by the way, stupid mother fucking idiot republican, NAFTA doesn't have anything to do with republican support for communist China. NAFTA stands for NORTH AMERICAN Free Trade....dumbass ! ! ! !!!!!!
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: No shit, retard. We were talking about both subjects. No surprise a Libtard can't follow a comment thread.
2010GOP 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: Oh ~ and to answer you question, I'm evaluating all Republican candidates & their positions. That's what smart people do, unlike you who bought into that Hopey Changey Horseshit.
However, I am leaning towards Rick Perry. You know, the Governor of Texas who created nearly 1/2 of all jobs in this country, balanced the budget, maintained a business-friendly environment, all while keeping some of the lowest taxes in the nation.
Will be a comedy show watching Obama debate him. LOL!
2010GOP 7 months ago
*your
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP LOL....Rick Perry and who....Palin?.....Bachman? Yeah sure.....God bless Palin and Bachman....a gift from God to the Democrat candidates. The philosopher Voltaire once said, "I have made but one prayer to God, 'make my enemies ridiculous', and God granted it." Thanks for the laugh.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: Perry/Rubio 2012 .. helluva ticket. Bachmann is very qualified for a cabinet position. You know, someone w/2 degrees, along w/business experience, understands the US Constitution, etc.
You keep laughing Pussy .. the country has awakened. Where were you just a few months ago when Democrats lost their ass?: Senate seats, 63 House seats losing the majority, majority of Governorships, and 600+ state legislative seats across the country. Maybe one day you'll grow up & grow a brain
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP The true American patriots will rise up against you communist Chinese republican traitors to your own country. You won't outsource the fucking revolution. You better import enough illegal alien labor to do your fighting for you. You republicans are good at bringing illegals into America for cheap labor. Right here in this thread you have bragged about underrcutting your fellow Americans with illegal aliens. You dirty lousy rotten filthy republican traitor to America.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@JetMechMA: Illegals? You, as a Liberal, are retarded enough to bring up illegals?
The other day, the leader of the Democratic Nat'l Cmte said, "Republicans think illegals being here is a crime. They just want to ship them all back". Here you go: /watch?v=asJNCKLoLNA
Obama/Democrats - refuse to protect the border; suing AZ
Obama claimed Republicans want a moat w/alligators at the border
Democrats vote to give Illegals welfare, and cheat to do it: /watch?v=N5Dul5hyoBA&feature=related
2010GOP 7 months ago
@2010GOP: Republicans are communists? Wow...
JM: Dirty lousy rotten filthy scum communist republicans fund explosive growth in communist China with jobs outsourced from America. republicans DECIMATE America with outsourcing. republicans fund explosive growth in communist China instead of in America. Keep your communist made shit over in your communist China motherland, would you. Communist republican traitors to your own country.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP made in communist China....that's you...you communist republican traitor to America.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
@2010GOP: & reiterating the same after 9/11
JM: AFTER Sept 11th, BUSH controlled the fucking intelligence.....he LIED about the WMD. Weapons inspectors TOLD the bush cabal that saddam no longer possessed WMD....and they were RIGHT ! ! ! !!!!! CIA testified under oath that there was no credible evidence that Iraq had any ties to anti-American terrorism in over a decade. YOU MASS MURDERED INNOCENT IRAQIS YOU FUCKING MONSTER ! ! !
JetMechMA 7 months ago
The congressional vote on attacking Iraq was based on false intelligence put out by the bush cabal. bush lied to the congress and they based their vote on that. It's one thing to tell congress that Saddam has WMD, but after you mass murder hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis, you better be right. Bush is a mass murdering war criminal who lied us into attacking Iraq and mass murdering hundreds of thousands of totally innocent Iraqis. bush should be tried for treason and sentenced to death.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
George Bush's highest unemployment was lower than Obama's lowest unemployment - Dept of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
I gladly say today merely against the democratic party you guys invaded Libya with the joke of doing nothing more than removing a dictator. And I'm still waiting for my war protest young angry liberals. No did not think so. Muhahahahah.
LokiScoutSniper 9 months ago
Bush was right. He said after democracy takes hold in Iraq, it would spread throughout the region... and that's what's happening right now.
NAGGERNUTZ 10 months ago 5
@NAGGERNUTZ Eight years after Iraq, in a country over 1,000 miles away (Tunisia), protests against the government in the midst of a global economic recession, all happened because they see "Democracy flourishing in Iraq"? Why not credit the fall of the Berlin Wall while you're at it?
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Bush was still right.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ Iraq has NOTHING to do with what is going on the Northern Africa and the lower Middle East right now.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Tell me something I don't know. Bush was STILL right. Sorry it chafes your ass, but it's true.
Bush said "once democracy is established in Iraq, it will spread throughout the region". It's happening right now. Maybe Iraq didn't have anything to do with it, but it's STILL happening... so... BUSH WAS RIGHT.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ If you credit Carter with the fall of the Berlin Wall, then your argument holds. But in fact, these protests *are taking place in Iraq right now too*. Bush's argument was that the sight of a flourishing Democracy in Iraq would encourage people in other nations to follow suit wanting the same thing. If "Iraq" is the reason why these nations are protesting, why is *Iraq* protesting? Because they've seen how good Democracy is? Democracy is not "flourishing" in Iraq. Bush was WRONG.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Stop spinning. Nobody said anything about democracy flourishing. The protests in Iraq have nothing to do with democracy. The protests are over corruption, unemployment, the lack of basic services and restrictions on freedom of expression (CNN April 8, 2011). They're protesting just like any other democracy. Iraqi's are able to elect their own representatives for the first time in history... and it's spreading throughout the region, just as Bush said it would. BUSH WAS RIGHT.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ I'm not sure you read your own words as you type. "No one said anything about Democracy Flourishing"? Google the phrase along with the words "President Bush" and tell me what you get (I direct you to January of 2007). You are absolutely CORRECT that the protests in Iraq are jobs, corruption and lack of services. But THAT is why they are/were protesting in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and everywhere else. NOT because they've been enticed by what they see happening in Iraq.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - I'm not real sure you get it either. You see, facts are funny things. They are what they are. They are the truth. Spin whatever reason you want... whatever makes you sleep better. The fact remains, Bush said that once democracy was established in Iraq, it would spread throughout the region. And guess what? It's by your own admission spreading throughout the region. Do you hate democracy or what? Or is it the fact that Bush said it and you hate Bush? Bush was right.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ This is insanity. You are ACTUALLY trying to argue that "Democracy in Iraq"... such that it is, and put in place nearly five years ago... is the sudden impetus for the protests currently going on in Egypt and the surrounding region NOW. And when you concede that the people in Iraq are protesting as well, Iraq somehow exists in a vacuum, unrelated to events in those other countries. Explain to me exactly HOW Iraq is the basis of these protests?
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - I'm not arguing anything, you are. You're getting off subject, my friend. The subject is... and it was my initial comment that you replied to...
"George Bush said that once democracy was established in Iraq, it would spread throughout the region". Guess what? It's spreading throughout the region. Syria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and there's even unrest in Qatar, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Stop trying to get off on a hissy tangent. Put your pants on and man up or stop responding. Simple.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ I asked one simple question and you couldn't answer it. "How is Iraq influencing these protests?"
The fact these protests are taking place years after Bush made his claim, doesn't mean Iraq is the influence behind them. Bush said Democracy in Iraq "would spread throughout the region", meaning other nations would follow Iraq's lead. Just because nations are currently protesting in no proof they have anything to do with Iraq. You can't say "Bush was right" simply because of sequence.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Wow... unbelievable. If I say it's going to snow tomorrow... and it does snow, could you say I was right? Pretty simple. I'm sorry if all the middle eastern countries didn't collapse the next day after Iraq did. In the real world, 5 years is nothing. I know you hate George Bush, but the man made a prediction and it came true. Now go away. If you can't handle the truth, then don't reply to peoples' comments. Maybe these other countries want to be able to elect their own representatives?
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ Let me put it this way: If I told someone "If I put this Welcome Mat on my doorstep, someone will knock on my door." Two years later, my landlord knocks on my door asking why I haven't paid my rent.
Was I right? Was my putting that doormat out responsible for "someone" knocking on my door two years later for a totally unrelated reason?
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - OMG!!! Are you serious? No wait... you're paranoid schizophrenic, right? Look, It's obvious that you're a rabid, liberal Bush hater. Fine. Hate away. But what the man said was correct. Do you suppose Bush was privy to intel that you and I aren't? Do you think it's possible that Bush knew ahead of time that these countries would be doing what they're doing now? Do you think maybe Obama knows too? Has the CIA ever conspired to take down a foreign government? Go away please.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ You are REALLY grasping at straws now, suggesting that you/Bush were right because "maybe" Bush had some intel six years ago that foresaw what would happen in 2011?
You don't get it. Your "snow prediction" example lacked any "cause & effect". Bush might as well have said, "If I snap my fingers, Democracy will eventually break out in the Middle East". Just because something happens, doesn't prove "cause & effect".
Clearly, you have no knowledge of WHAT sparked these recent protests.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Are you back again? No more welcome mat stories? If Obama had said the same thing, you'd be singing his praises. Now, for the forth time... please... go away.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ What a wuss. Until you can answer simple questions, I'm not going anywhere.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - OK... you wait. Hold your breath while you're at it.
FACTS:
Fact 1 - George Bush Said "after democracy takes hold in Iraq, it will spread throughout the region"
Fact 2 - It happened.
Fact 3 - George Bush was right.
I'm curious... have you even watched this video?
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ You can't dismiss "cause & effect" simply because you find it inconvenient.
FACT - Bush said "IF we do X, Y will happen."
X did not cause Y. Bush was wrong.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - By the same token, you can't dismiss truth just because you're a liberal troll and the truth hurts.
In comparison, Bush was a much better president than Obama... and he was right. Now watch the video.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ I'll ask my simple question again. Let's see if you answer it:
If Bush had said, "If I snap my fingers, Democracy will break out in the Middle East", would you still say "Bush was right"?
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Only if he snapped his fingers and it happened. You aren't too stable are you? You seem to be digging like crazy to find any way to discredit George Bush. Actually, having Bush back in the white house right about now, would be a godsend. There is NOTHING that George Bush did that Obama hasn't. Jimmy Carter was our worst president ever, but he's in second place now.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ Just establishing your level of intellectual (dis)honesty. By that same standard, I can say with absolute authority that aliens will land on the White House lawn, scientists will find a cure for cancer, and the island of Japan will sink into the ocean.
All three statements meet your criteria of 1) I said it. 2) No time frame, so if it takes a billion years, I predicted it, ergo, 3) I am right.
BTW: Check your math on Carter. Both Bushes and Ford created fewer jobs... COMBINED.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Well, I guess it's better to be right and not know it, than to know it and argue to the contrary. Congratulations.
You are good for a daily laugh though.
There are 52 people who were held hostage in Iran for 444 days by Islamic extremists... and released exactly 20 minutes after Ronald Reagan was sworn in, that might disagree with you on Carter. That's all the math I need to know on Carter. Did I mention gas lines that stretched for miles?
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ Since I'm old enough to remember Carter (and Ford), I'd remind you that the gas lines began under Ford. They returned during the Russian oil embargo in response to their aiding Iran. Waiting until Regan was sworn in was Iran's "slap in the face" to Carter. So unless you are on the side of Iran here, I don't think the timing of the hostages release is a criticism of Carter.
But I've already established your level of intellectual (dis)honesty. By YOUR standards, YES, Bush "was right".
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - I'm not only old enough to remember them, I'm old enough to have actually been able to wipe my own ass at the time... unless you're not telling the truth about your age... which is quite possible considering how you've nit picked and spun every fact so far. The gas lines started under Carter. I know because I was actually driving at the time and sat in the gas lines. Oh, so Carter was such a great president that's why our hostages rotted for 444 days? Weakness is good? I get it now.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ I'm not about to get into another absurd side argument with you over something easily provable by a Google search. And a Bush apologist such as yourself certainly shouldn't start criticizing presidents over their ability to "get the job done" within a respectable amount of time.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Your entire dialog has been a side argument. Why stop now? I'm sensing some anger. I never apologized for Bush. I merely stated a fact. Sorry if democracy didn't come to the middle east the day after Bush made the statement. Kind-of a lame argument, but then again, what else is new?
1st Corinthians 13:11
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ I never strayed from the topic. I probably shouldn't have said "apologist" since you clearly believe he has nothing to apologize for, Fine. Absurd. But fine.
The "timing" of "Democracy breaking out" in Northern Africa today is... by your own admission... irrelevant since (by your own admission) Bush had nothing to do with it, and cause & effect is irrelevant.
And I wouldn't be quoting 1Cor13:11, since you clearly haven't yet reached stage two.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Oh how your comment just drips with hypocrisy! You can't get past Bush, when Obama has done or is doing the very same. Obama has as much to apologize for in just 2 years compared to Bush's 8 years. Otherwise explain what Bush did that Obama hasn't.
I never said Bush had anything to do with democracy "breaking out"... you did. I merely stated that Bush said that after democracy is established in Iraq, it would spread throughout the region, which it did. So... again, Bush was right.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ You'll have to point out my hypocrisy, because I never once mentioned Obama.
You "never said Bush had anything to do with democracy 'breaking out'", and in the same sentence conclude "after democracy is established in Iraq, it would spread throughout the region, which it did. So... again, Bush was right."
The fact that you can't see you are trying to credit Bush for the current protests makes this a pointless argument.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - OMG!!! Your hypocrisy is NOT MENTIONING OBAMA! You bash Bush, while letting Obama off the hook for doing the very same things Bush did. I'm now convinced that you're not mentally stable.
"The fact that you can't see you are trying to credit Bush for the current protests makes this a pointless argument." If it's a pointless argument, then why did you start this dialog? There's some more hypocrisy. hypocrisy.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ You're assuming I'm an Obama supporter simply because I'm a Democrat. That's a Republican thing. Republicans believe you must agree 100% with everything the GOP does or else call yourself "an Independent". I'm an adult. I can still call myself a Democrat w/o agreeing with everything my Party does.
You should probably buy yourself a dictionary and look up the word "hypocrisy". I never defended Obama for doing the things Bush did. I'm not surprised you can't tell the difference.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - uh huh... just a troll. You got yourself into something that you can't get yourself out of, so now you're running for the hills. You get credit for at least finally admitting that Obama isn't worth arguing over. You lose points for jumping on Bush. There's the hypocrisy. I wonder if 2 years ago you were singing the same tune.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ Clearly, you can't carry on a discussion w/o devolving into juvenile ad hominem attacks. I'm not "running for the hills" by refusing to defend Obama simply because you believe that's the job of anyone that calls themselves a Democrat.
You claim to be older than me, but every one of your posts so far has been a childish example of pathetic name calling.
What was it you quoted? 1 Cor 13:11?
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - From the very first reply that you made to my simple, but true statement, I've given you the opportunity to go away. YOU chose to attack me for making a simple statement that YOU just couldn't handle. All because you just can't stand that George Bush said something that came true. YOU chose to perpetuate this, not me. Out of 10,300 viewers of this video, YOU were the only one that attacked me for my statement. Now YOU can't handle what you got back. Grow up or stop attacking people.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ You've called me a child while lobbing childish names at me. You accused me of "running away" while begging me to leave. And pointing out a fallacy is not an "attack".
But we can conclude this quickly if you answer this simple question:
In your initial comment, when you said "Bush was right", where you praising his psychic powers or what a lucky guesser he was? You've already conceded it wasn't for his actions in Iraq.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Was I praising his psychic powers or what a lucky guesser he was? Are you kidding? Bush made a simple, but true statement. Tell me, why does it matter so much to you? My guess is, you're a hater. You simply can't handle the fact that he was right... wild guess or psychic power. You hate George Bush, you hate conservatives. I read your channel page. Now put your big boy pants on... man up... accept the facts. Go away or keep perpetuating your hate. Now I'VE exposed liberal hypocrisy.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ So, "lucky guess" then?
If no one were saying "Bush was wrong", there'd be no need to proclaim "Bush was right" There can be only three reasons: a) You are praising his psychic abilities to foresee the future, b) You are commenting on his amazing guessing skills, or c) You believe current events vindicate him.
A & B are both nonsense, and you concede it's not C. Either you are a liar or an idiot (or likely both.)
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Your hate propels you on huh? You keep asking me questions, but you refuse to answer mine. What does it matter? In reality, it doesn't. It's all about your hate. You boldly state it on your channel page.
I'm either a liar or an idiot? Let's break this down... I made a simple, but true statement. George Bush made a simple statement that proved true (those pesky facts on current events again). I guess in your liberal, hating, mind if you can't handle the truth it's got to be a lie?
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ What does it matter? When you first posted "Bush was right", you were trying to credit him for current events. When I called you on it, you denied it and came up with this bizarre "Because it happened, it's true" nonsense defense. Trying to get a Conservative ideologue to acknowledge their own nonsense is like trying to train a dog to play piano. Mea culpa.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - What's even worse, is some liberal moonbat is posting our dialog on an obscure little amateurish web site. I feel honored. It's amazing how the libtards will take such a simple statement and run with it. The only problem is, nobody will ever get the chance to read it. I have to go... CNN and MSNBC will no doubt be trying to contact me for an interview. Hey, tell me, you probably knock down a few hundred thousand a week on ad sales alone, huh? Woo hoo and the custom artwork is awesome!
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ Your stinging defense of your hypocrisy cuts me to the bone. Salute. Moron.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Awe, now there you go... calling me names. That wouldn't be another example of your hypocrisy, would it? I've waited all day and I haven't heard from CNN or MSNBC yet... but I still have hope. How much did it cost for that custom artwork? Was it expensive? You're still gonna post this aren't you? I'd hate for this dialog to go unseen. Oh, wait... nobody will see it anyway! Uh oh... the phones ringing... maybe it's the Huffington Post!
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
Comment removed
BI30 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ @NAGGERNUTZ Sorry if you don't like "moonbat trolls" calling you names. Call the waaaambulance.
Congratulations on figuring out how to visit my profile and click on my homepage. I'm (not) surprised it took you as long as it did. You clearly think you have an audience here cheering you on. You should be thrilled I posted your comments someplace where people (100 a week) will actually see it.
Thank you for the compliment on my artwork. Yes, I do get paid for it.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Oh to the contrary. I enjoy how wingnuts always break down to name calling when they get bested. Nothing new here. So stop whining.
Now let's address the next lie. 100 hits a week? Please don't make me laugh. You're lucky to get one hit a week and that's by accident... exactly the way I found your little gem web site. I found it by doing a Google for George Bush's true statement... I found your little rant. I've built enough web sites to know you started the counter at 76,100.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ Actually, I've been doing my blog since the 2004 election. The counter started at zero. And if you revisit each Monday, you can witness the number of hits (assuming you can count.)
And if you review the thread, the first "name" was lobbed by you. I too enjoy how Wingnuts break down into name-calling when they lack an intelligent response. Thanks for letting me know why you did so.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - The first rule about holes: When you're in one, stop digging. Let me see if I can break this down a little further. 5 days ago, I saw your site for the first time. Yesterday, the counter still hadn't advanced, with the exception of one, which was me. Yesterday, I brought it to your attention and lo and behold, over night the counter advances 116 hits! Amazing! So.... either liberals only read your site one day a week, or, you're manipulating the counter AFTER I brought it up!!! Liar.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ You are indeed a sad little man. The number of hit naturally drops off towards the end of the week as I only post a WEEKLY Op/Ed on Mondays. The majority of my hits occur on the first days of publication, which in this case is Sunday night thru Tuesday morning.
You are looking REALLY desperate at this point.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Just keep digging.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@BI30 - Hey, here's some further proof that you're a liar. The time line of our dialog, that YOU published on your web site, proves you a liar. Yep, if I were you, I'd only publish the good stuff too...NOT. You're not only a liar, you're not even good at it. Pathetic. And the funniest part of it... I didn't have to do a thing to prove it... YOU did it yourself! I can't stop laughing.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ In case you didn't notice, the time beneath posts here changes. Those times were accurate when I copied and pasted them into my Op/Ed.
You keep calling me a "liar" every time you can't figure something out. We've gone from "sad" to "pathetic".
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - OMG!!! Without THINKING, you again prove that you're lying! You might want to stop now. You've already destroyed any semblance of honesty. Remember the first rule of holes? You're way below ground level now. Hey, keep trying, you might hit OIL!
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@BI30 - Hey! Why did you stop posting this? I'm disappointed. I checked your web site (of course the page counter hasn't advanced in three days now), so there blows the 100 hits a day lie. How much you wanna bet, in a month, if I go back, the counter will be the same? Come on, a serious newsman on a big time libtard web site can't let himself get flustered, like you're obviously doing now. Don't feel bad, you just broke a little sooner than most. Most moonbats take a little longer to break.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ Once I post my Op/Ed's, the story is over. To quote you: "Nothing new here." And repeatedly whining about me "whining" (which I have not done) seems to be par for the course with you... calling me names then whining about me calling you names, begging me to "go away" while accusing me of "running away", et al.
As for my counter not advancing, there have been 96 hits in 24 hours. The count was 76,112 when posted Sunday night.
So, where's your "big time website"? I didn't think so.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Oh, I see... only cover the game until half-time. You wouldn't want your readers to see the game turn around would you? Sad, very sad. But I digress. It's your web site and you are a liberal, so reporting only half of the story and cherry picking what you do report is expected. You must spend hours writing content... but wait... it only took me 5 minutes to read the entire web site. So if you started the site in 2004, it's taken 7 years to get to where you are? One lie leads to another.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
Comment removed
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Well gee, let me see. Most journalists wait till a dialog or debate is over before publishing ANYTHING. Now that you're being exposed as the liar that you obviously are, you end the report? Please tell me what school of journalism that you flunked out of? Also, where did you learn web design? Because damned if I can find 296 articles. If I can't find them, nobody else can. But wait, you lied before, could this be another lie? You're not only a liar, you're a fraud too.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ One thing I noticed long ago was the more a Republicans' argument falls apart, the more Replies they post in response to every answer. You were already posting two responses for every one of my comments. When I reply to both, it grows to three. Sad. And I *did* wait until "the debate was over". You just don't realize it.
Need help finding those older posts? Scroll to the bottom and click "Older entries", OR use the calendar at the top of the screen. Not too difficult.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 - Wow! By your own words... I'VE begged you to go away. But you keep coming back. So I guess that further proves that you're desperate to find something... anything... that you can use to save face, otherwise, you'd have been gone days ago. Yep, keep coming back. Doesn't it suck when your own words come back to haunt you? I'm not perpetuating anything... YOU ARE. One lie leads to another. I guess you haven't learned that lesson yet. I'll take you to school.
NAGGERNUTZ 9 months ago