anyways those are the two fastest laps ever, webber went faster than michael... and in fact so did alonso. not to mention vettel did a 24 flat in q2, so michael's lap is only 5th fastest lol.
@OriginalDaVe it's true that in 2010 some drivers beat michael's time but i think that make a video with two 2010 cars is a bit silly, because until this year the best time was of michael. I'd prefer to put the best lap at the moment and the other best, that was in 2010.
@utente3893 how can the 04 be the fastest when the 2010 car has the fastest lap at melbourne? it is circuit dependent. the 10 cars rape 04 cars at monaco.
@OriginalDaVe I think he means acceleration and top speed wise. But of course they have less grip. But it isnt true the 2010 cars rape the 04 cars at Monaco.
Whilst at other circuits, such as Melbourne, the 2010 cars are faster. Raikkonens 2007 pole at spa would have been good enough for 3rd on this years Spa grid iirc. Monza, 1:20.089 in 2004 whilst 1:21.962 in 2010, nearly 2 seconds quicker. So yeah, its cicrcuit dependant. Imagine '10 cars with V10's...
Remember that F1 2004 had grooved tires with less grip unlike full slicks of the RedBull
m598lmr 1 month ago
F2004 - best car ever, MS best driver ever :-) But Seb is kewl, too. :)
DarthSparhawk 7 months ago
The red bull has defenitely got better brakes!
ApplicationTestTeam 8 months ago
the f2004 is a faster car, considering it was carrying 50kg of fuel. the redbull was on fumes.
clay111 1 year ago
anyways those are the two fastest laps ever, webber went faster than michael... and in fact so did alonso. not to mention vettel did a 24 flat in q2, so michael's lap is only 5th fastest lol.
OriginalDaVe 1 year ago
@OriginalDaVe it's true that in 2010 some drivers beat michael's time but i think that make a video with two 2010 cars is a bit silly, because until this year the best time was of michael. I'd prefer to put the best lap at the moment and the other best, that was in 2010.
quiquegines 1 year ago
What a nice cocaphony of noise
MXW77 1 year ago 4
@MXW77 :))))))))))))))))))))
tibjmk 1 year ago
2010 cars have more grip but 2004 cars were the fastest
utente3893 1 year ago 5
@utente3893 how can the 04 be the fastest when the 2010 car has the fastest lap at melbourne? it is circuit dependent. the 10 cars rape 04 cars at monaco.
OriginalDaVe 1 year ago
@OriginalDaVe I think he means acceleration and top speed wise. But of course they have less grip. But it isnt true the 2010 cars rape the 04 cars at Monaco.
1:13.826 in 2010.
1:13.985 in 2004.
Whilst at other circuits, such as Melbourne, the 2010 cars are faster. Raikkonens 2007 pole at spa would have been good enough for 3rd on this years Spa grid iirc. Monza, 1:20.089 in 2004 whilst 1:21.962 in 2010, nearly 2 seconds quicker. So yeah, its cicrcuit dependant. Imagine '10 cars with V10's...
MetaKnightsKirby 1 year ago
@MetaKnightsKirby 2010 cars with V10's? That would be immense...
MegaSparky555 1 year ago