i am a true hindu and i respect every religion my head bows down infront of temple mosque church gurudwara or at any place where people worship the god almighty with true heart
we all are indians frnds and even before that human beings let us be that first
If vasudev wud go 2 war..they al wud hav died in an instant....but this is the msg wich v hav 2 learn...God is always there 2 support u..but u hav 2 fite ur own battles....do ur own karma..nt wait 4 God 2 do it 4 u...God can be our srength..but not our karta of our actions...
The bottom line is that Bruce Lee woulld have any of these mortal warriors with or without weapons. His training regime was far superior and not one of these warriors knew how to fight without weapons. Abhimanyu is the ultiate portrayal of a REAL MAN and that is the purpose of his character....but I have a feeling that Bruce wld have managed to exit the circle fairly easily. What does every1 think...pls comment?
We really dont know how far the depiction of this Great War is on par with the One that really happened and so I cannot comment or compare these two great warriors.
infact the day when jaydrath was killed was the fiercest battle of the mahabharata. Arjuna was so devastating on the kaurava army where he single handedly destroys 2 akshaunis. Arjuna was the only factor which the Kauravas feared. But more than him, It was definetely Lord Krishna who called all the shots.
wow what a great warrior abhimanyu is. he is also known as veerabhimanyu. all these cowards killed him. he doesn't know how to come out of chakravyuh. this leads to karna's demice
Krishna took Arjun away from Chakravyooh because Karan is waiting inside with his Vaijayanthi (Shakti given by Devendra). Arjun can easily break up the Chakravyooh, but the end would have been disasterous for Arjun himself. So, first Abhimanyu And then Ghatotkatch were sacrificed for Arjun's sake. After all, Arjun to phir Arjun Hain.
@generalchathans if what u say is correct, then how comes on the following day, when Arjun was ifiltrating the kaurava army looking for Jayadrath, he came face to face with Karan who tried to stop Arjun from entering. Karan couldn't even use thhat so called shakti on him then, but instead got defeated by Arjun. Explain that. I don't think yourr theory is correct. On the 13th day, Krishna actually told Arjun not to stray far from Yudhisthir, but Arjun's warrior pride got the better of him.
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
@bhasinuscuscable Killing Bhishmapitamah by cheating was somehow justifiable as he himself mentioned it because he came in the Battlefield with the ItchaMrityu Kawach!!! Once again , don't forget that even if he told Pandav how he can be defeated, he also told Duryodhan in which way they can protect him!!!
@bhasinuscuscable my dr friend you seem to forget that it was Duryodhan who started this CHEATING process!!! Remember how he got the Second best Charioteer, King Shalya on his side!!! Concerning the dual between Bhina and Duryodhan. Isn't it CHEATING to have a dual fight with an added protection ( The boon that his Mother Gandhari gave him) ??? Even Arjun had Divyasatra, but he never used them during the Kurukshetra!!!
Well, he was a demon in his last life. The important lesson that you are missing is that he repented for his mistakes.
That doesn't mean he won't be punished but the repentance is what separates him from say, Jadradath. (yes, my spelling sucks).
People tell lies all the time but how many people actually regret doing so each time?
Not many, I bet. What I am saying is that a person's negative traits do not cancel out his positive traits and vice versa. A liar can still be a saint, etc.
I hope you don't think that I am apologizing for Karna's actions. For me, Abimanyu's death justifies all the rule-breaking ways that Drona, Karna, etc. die (Drona is unarmed, Karna is lifting chariot wheel).
Unfair deaths but they had it coming after hacking a young boy into pieces from all sides.
i.e. Maharathi vs Maharathi...but we see warriors from both camps flouting this rule from day 1 itself for eg.Arjun killing 10-100 normal foot-soldiers by firing a single arrows using mantras...WAS THAT FAIR??? If not,all this talk about unfair means is totally useless because in war it is impossible to follow such rules and gain victory.But,Ofcourse,Pandavas deserved the victory.
I just want to say one thing...people here are highlighting the fact that abhimanyu died because of a seven on one assualt but what about the normal soldiers...each and every maharathi on both sides were supposed to fight warriors of equal rank
He then tells Daruka: "There is no one that is as dear to Me as Arjuna..not even my wives and I shall not be able to see the earth even a day without Arjuna.
Tommorow if Arjuna will not be able to make it, I will blow the conch and you get the chariot. I shall slay the entire army of 21 Akshaunis and let Arjun fulfil his oath. I will end the war tommorow itself." For his devotees, Krishna can even take up defamy! But ofcourse in His case all negatives(like defamy) only glorifies Him :)
Nice to meet u 2 man :). Such things I learnt from forums and also comments in youtube etc....indeed ve got to know a lot even from the Mahabharat comments here
WHen Arjun took the oath of slaying Jayadrath, Krishna's reaction to it was so touching that it still never fails to move me. He asks Arjun as to how he plans to do it for which Arjun says that with the weapons in his quiver and Krishna as his charioteer he will have no problem. Krishna walks out lost in deep thoughts...then He remembers Daruka, His charioteer who appears with His chariot and His grand horses, chakra etc.
Arjun was killed by Babruvahan not because Arjun was incapable but because of a curse given by Ganga. She was infuriated by the fall of Bhishma because of Arjuna as Bhishma brought up Arjuna when he was a kid. So Ganga cursed Arjuna that he will be killed by Arjun's own son. However Krishna brought him back to life.
Bheema defeated Karna in archery. It is mentioned in VedVyas Mahabharat. I don't remember if it is in the Drona Parva or Karna Parva. But I can guarantee it did happen according to the so called Vyas Mahabharath available today
A person's strength and ability should also be measured by the Divyaastras he possesses as he worked hard to get the Divyaastras. It is like seeking for knowledge through severe penance, learn and acquire it. Keep in mind that knowing to use a Divyaastra is not a joke like what is shown in the serials. It requires a lot of concentration, mental ability, temparament, presence of mind and above all the ability to handle it.
abhimanyu was killed in chakravyuha ,in ckaravyuha a lone warrior is attacked by buch of warriors thats why it is worst feared arrangement in ancient times.
In this incident, may be... but saying such things to greatest warriors such as Drona and Karna is unfair...
I heard that among the 6 people,
Parashuram, Bhishm, Drona, Karna, Arjun and Abhimanyu... nobody can beat other in a fair one-one battle.... (w/o using Divyastras after which anything can happen)...... They are all the greatest archers in this epic and none of them should be INSULTED according to me....
They were great warriors but every one is defeatable even by fair means.
--Parashuram was about to be killed by Bhishma when he was about to use "Praswapa Asthra"--Bhishma was defeated by "Kalayavan" which is actually smothered in the Mahabharat.
--Drona and Karna were defeated by Arjun in Virata war.
--Karna was defeated by Bheema in archery in the final war
Yeah.. But Bhishma was about to use Divyastr.. Same goes with Drona and Karna in Virata war.. But neways I think once Divyastra are used, it is definitely possible.
I doubt if ever Karna gets defeated by Bheema...... in archery... But I don't for sure though....
Arjun was never defeated... And Karna fans shuld see minute 39, what is Karn who claims to be better than Arjun saying here? Can't he block Arjun? If he can not what was he claiming all through his life?
I could def have duryodhan in a one on one fist fight and i'll 100% take out karan too. arjun was great warrior but would be taken straight out by laxman and without the bow he wouldnt stand long in the ring against tyson
Babrubahan was a king Tripura and he happened to be a son of Arjun. The war between the legendary babru happened to be in Awmedha Yagna of Pandavas. He even killed arjun but there is Krishna to make alive back. Arjun denied Baru is not his son, he must be coward , the but hot blooded babru showed that he is really arjun's son.
reply to jerichococmosy2j: no doubt they were all great cowards! super cowards to fight a lone young warrior whom they themselves called 'baalak' - child!! shame on the 7 maharathi!! dont deserve to be called maharathis but napunsaks!!
@shahkinghero I AM MUSLIM BUT I UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT THE RELIGION OF MY ANCESTORS. I WISH ABHIMANIYU WAS MY SON AND I COULD HAVE BEEN PROUDEST FATHER EVER. THIS BRAVE KID WAS MURDERED COWEREDLY. AND ALL THOSE WHO KILLED HIM WERE TO LOOSE RESPECT FOR EVER.
@ shahkinghero.... dude, you are correct. You have captured the true essence of the Mahabharat as an integral part of Indian culture and not just limited to the Hindus. May people of your understanding and intellect continue to grow....
mahabharat actually represents the pride, jealousy and ego of a great ruler who destroys and loses everything for nothing. (Duryodhan).
All dirty tricks are fair in warfare and politics. It does not matter how brave you are, as Mahabharat proves, the objective is to end the war as quickly as possible, by whatever means.
who told you that u should end war by watever means.. it says that there is nothing wrong in doing something wrong for doing something right.. pandavas are righteous and they are trying to follow their dharam by doing a lil bit adharam
Winning war by whatever means is adharam. Through cunning and cheating, the Pandavas won the battle. The silly warfare rules in fact destroyed India since millions of men were wasted in open battle...
sau sach se eek juth accha agar woh kisi ki bhalai ke liye bola gaya ho. have u heard of that.. btw pandavas did wat sri krishna said and they did not do it coz they wanted a piece of land. they did it to fight against injustice done to them. they did it coz krishna advised them.. moreover, when a warrior does not stand on right side, he got no right to live coz a warrior's duty is to fight against injustice and not againsts right and justice
dharma should be protected at all costs. that is wat pandavas did.. millions of warriors died coz they were fighting agianst injustice and some were fighting wid injustice.. hope u got wat i m tryin to say
hello!!. rightfully and even ethically yudhisthir was supposed to king hence duryodhan tried to kill him so many times.. after that they got indraprastha that too coz it was a vast barren land.. they made that place worth living and then they lost it.. they were suppose to complete 13 years in exile and get back their kingdom.. they did that.. so tell me where the hell do u think that they had to right over the throne
And moreover by your logic, even Dhritarashtra and Pandu should not have been kings as they are not biological sons of Vichitraveerya. The sons produced through the process become legal heirs to their foster fathers although their biological fathers are different.
Coming to tricks of Pandavas, as johnsalman66 explained, perhaps the lesson here is that one can deter from being moral 100 % of the time to save long term interests of Dharma in a larger way.
so wat? they were atlest kings by half blood.. hence they were legal heirs as there was no one eligible for that. yup i agree wid the last line.. lol r u trying to say that duryodhan was on path of dharma and he was trying to protect dharma?
well you need to remember what the mahabharat actually represents , the breakdown of all social order. the old order based on individual chivalry, exploited by the corrupt, the violent replacement of that by a sense of group ethic and larger good...
everybody should learn this, it teaches us lot of good things as guru Drona said u should never satisfied with what u hav achieved, u should be good learner.
@mpatel14 Wonder if it is the same reason as Bhishma told Karna that he didn't allow him in war as he wanted to both live Arjun and Karna after the war as Hastinapur would get void or great warriors ! And Krishna just thaought something like against this truth ! and if, why ?
it was this sacrifice of abhimanyu ... ( i guess Lord krishna knew this too ..) ..he told this in earlier episode that he was born such that one whole day would be written for him ..so it was..... because they didn't fought as per the rules of the game..... lord krishna decided ( later I guess) to themselves forget the rule ..tit for tat ...another trick of Lord Krishna ;)
I beleive Abhimanyu had a boon .... that nobody can defeat him by fighting headon mano-a-mano... so they all gangedup on him...It was his only way to gain moksha...anyways abhimanyu i salute you..
no, abhimanyu had no such boon. he was strong enough for all of them if they fought the kid in one on one. Drona knew this. he was the only one who cried when shooting arrows at abhimanyu.
abhimanyu's death shown here is false. actually dushasana's son later crushed his skull with a mace when we was unconscious.
Abhimanyu didnot have self wish death in his hand unlike bhiesma..so to defeat that was the only way but Abhimanyu was just a kid infront of karna,Drona,Duryodhan and many more .Still they couldnt defeat him one on one(shameful)so I agree it totally ruined Dronas and karna's reputation so everthing became fair after this
I sometimes really wish that Arjuna ordered all the cowards to not pay respects to his son. I definitively would not let them even 100 ft within his body.
I understand why you may feel frustrated or at odds with that. But, both were totally different situations, Arjun and Shree Ganga Puthar Bhisma were not only opponents, but even then loved each other deeply, so Bhisma and Abhaniyu's situation were different so have some respect and don't call great warriors dumb. thanks.
what a tragic death. Clever of Krishna to let Abhimanyu die so that Drona, Karna, etc, etc have lost all the protection that their good deeds had given them until that point. From this point of the war, they were truly adharmic and thus destined to lose.
Karna still had his Indra-Shakti at this time. He could have stood in front of Jayadratha, and used the Shakti against Arjun.
kmg4 1 month ago
great acting by Arjun.
shailee25 5 months ago
@shailee25 His name is Firoz Khan...and he is a proud Indian.....After this serial he changed his name to Arjun Firoz Khan
psychoforam 1 week ago
i agree Abhimaniyu was the great warrior of all... one man alone face 7 people
preetygulati1 5 months ago
y krishan was looking surprize he should of known
masterblasterr1 5 months ago
jai shree krisna
jignesh823 6 months ago
Mahabharat has lots of bloody coward people.
Shamelesspeople
ramayan123 6 months ago
asvasthama is stil alive many ppls have seen him in himalayas, as he is eternal
TheVikki3030 8 months ago
i am a true hindu and i respect every religion my head bows down infront of temple mosque church gurudwara or at any place where people worship the god almighty with true heart
we all are indians frnds and even before that human beings let us be that first
sunooona 8 months ago 2
my heart is aching...
0nman 9 months ago
how come vansudev didn't go to war!
prami2 10 months ago
@prami2
If vasudev wud go 2 war..they al wud hav died in an instant....but this is the msg wich v hav 2 learn...God is always there 2 support u..but u hav 2 fite ur own battles....do ur own karma..nt wait 4 God 2 do it 4 u...God can be our srength..but not our karta of our actions...
krishnathakkar61 6 months ago 4
The bottom line is that Bruce Lee woulld have any of these mortal warriors with or without weapons. His training regime was far superior and not one of these warriors knew how to fight without weapons. Abhimanyu is the ultiate portrayal of a REAL MAN and that is the purpose of his character....but I have a feeling that Bruce wld have managed to exit the circle fairly easily. What does every1 think...pls comment?
1RONLUNG999 11 months ago
@1RONLUNG999
We really dont know how far the depiction of this Great War is on par with the One that really happened and so I cannot comment or compare these two great warriors.
solusindica89 10 months ago
infact the day when jaydrath was killed was the fiercest battle of the mahabharata. Arjuna was so devastating on the kaurava army where he single handedly destroys 2 akshaunis. Arjuna was the only factor which the Kauravas feared. But more than him, It was definetely Lord Krishna who called all the shots.
ajayjeev 11 months ago
wow what a great warrior abhimanyu is. he is also known as veerabhimanyu. all these cowards killed him. he doesn't know how to come out of chakravyuh. this leads to karna's demice
parakala1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys I've found one link of Mahabharat part 2 i mean the history after the war.
bwtorrents(dot)com/threads/272 686-Mahabharat-Katha-Part-2-(4 5-avi-files)-B(dot)R(dot)Chopra
mit3inn 1 year ago
it's awesome i don't have enough word to exeplain my feelings
patelkeyur952 1 year ago
Dharma always wins...jai shri krishna
TheAvishek007 1 year ago
i loved the way how krishna comforted arjun!!! a real gyani friend!! I love Krishna
todehni 1 year ago
Krishna took Arjun away from Chakravyooh because Karan is waiting inside with his Vaijayanthi (Shakti given by Devendra). Arjun can easily break up the Chakravyooh, but the end would have been disasterous for Arjun himself. So, first Abhimanyu And then Ghatotkatch were sacrificed for Arjun's sake. After all, Arjun to phir Arjun Hain.
generalchathans 1 year ago 3
@generalchathans if what u say is correct, then how comes on the following day, when Arjun was ifiltrating the kaurava army looking for Jayadrath, he came face to face with Karan who tried to stop Arjun from entering. Karan couldn't even use thhat so called shakti on him then, but instead got defeated by Arjun. Explain that. I don't think yourr theory is correct. On the 13th day, Krishna actually told Arjun not to stray far from Yudhisthir, but Arjun's warrior pride got the better of him.
dannyp206 5 months ago
Duryodhan again at 30: 48..ahahahhahah.. hardcore disrespect..
axl8 1 year ago
AT 29:08 minutes Duryodhan-"iske baad tumhari barri hai"- ahahhhahaha...
axl8 1 year ago
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
foryatharthgeeta 1 year ago
arjune ne sabse pehle nihatthe bheeshm pe ban chalaya tha.
shanu7uday 1 year ago
why is my comment written in devnagri not displayed??? you tube do u hav an answer?
shanu7uday 1 year ago
Comment removed
shanu7uday 1 year ago
Comment removed
shanu7uday 1 year ago
Comment removed
shanu7uday 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I disagree with many people here.. पांडवों ने ही नियम उल्लंघन आरम्भ किया था |
याद रहे.. कि "निहत्थे" पितामह पर प्रथम बाण चला कर अर्जुन पहले ही नियम तोड़ चुका था
shanu7uday 1 year ago
Comment removed
shanu7uday 1 year ago
Draupati Vast Haran and Abhimanyu's Killing were two main events that made Mahabharat.
The first one started it and the second one ended it.
lovelynight007 1 year ago
@bhasinuscuscable Killing Bhishmapitamah by cheating was somehow justifiable as he himself mentioned it because he came in the Battlefield with the ItchaMrityu Kawach!!! Once again , don't forget that even if he told Pandav how he can be defeated, he also told Duryodhan in which way they can protect him!!!
artist1402 1 year ago
@bhasinuscuscable my dr friend you seem to forget that it was Duryodhan who started this CHEATING process!!! Remember how he got the Second best Charioteer, King Shalya on his side!!! Concerning the dual between Bhina and Duryodhan. Isn't it CHEATING to have a dual fight with an added protection ( The boon that his Mother Gandhari gave him) ??? Even Arjun had Divyasatra, but he never used them during the Kurukshetra!!!
artist1402 1 year ago
salute to abhimanu
ravisrocks 1 year ago
Thank you Rajshri for uploading I loved it still and we'll still be the very best epic I've ever seen and will be the best I've ever seen jai hind
MrDhamaal 1 year ago
abe hindi me bolo sab angrezi bolni jaruri hain yaha pe bhi
9711ALI 1 year ago 4
@9711ALI abey, angrezi to angrezi hi tho hotha hain, ye tho angrezi ka web hain
hcpspilakarb 1 year ago
@hcpspilakarb to bhai hinglish bolo not pure english :)
9711ALI 1 year ago
@9711ALI teekh hain saab!
hcpspilakarb 1 year ago
this episode makes it appear as if ABhimanyu was the only person ever killed in Kurukshetra. Just to generate sympathy for the Pandavas
eghead2000 1 year ago
I think the Abhimanyu episode will shut the mouth of all those who said anything about dharma not being on Pandava side.
ThePelikan93 1 year ago 4
From this point of the war, they were truly adharmic and thus destined to lose.
mrtechnology100 1 year ago 2
Abimanyu death may have been a blessing. So Arjun can actually now focus on the war ????
kingofthenight1 1 year ago
Abimanyu broke his brahmacharya- see the price he had to pay!!
computermaster 2 years ago
Karna is kayar. first he does work like kayar and then asks for forgiveness!
dev8082ruj 2 years ago
kayar tries to find excuses, not ask for forgiveness
taapas111 1 year ago
Well, he was a demon in his last life. The important lesson that you are missing is that he repented for his mistakes.
That doesn't mean he won't be punished but the repentance is what separates him from say, Jadradath. (yes, my spelling sucks).
People tell lies all the time but how many people actually regret doing so each time?
Not many, I bet. What I am saying is that a person's negative traits do not cancel out his positive traits and vice versa. A liar can still be a saint, etc.
pratt123 1 year ago
I hope you don't think that I am apologizing for Karna's actions. For me, Abimanyu's death justifies all the rule-breaking ways that Drona, Karna, etc. die (Drona is unarmed, Karna is lifting chariot wheel).
Unfair deaths but they had it coming after hacking a young boy into pieces from all sides.
pratt123 1 year ago 6
yeah I 100% agree with you frnd
Tanu370 1 year ago
i.e. Maharathi vs Maharathi...but we see warriors from both camps flouting this rule from day 1 itself for eg.Arjun killing 10-100 normal foot-soldiers by firing a single arrows using mantras...WAS THAT FAIR??? If not,all this talk about unfair means is totally useless because in war it is impossible to follow such rules and gain victory.But,Ofcourse,Pandavas deserved the victory.
zubinr9 2 years ago
yeah, the rules are pretty fuzzy.
dp2284 2 years ago
you understand diff between 1 killing Many and Many killing 1?
taapas111 1 year ago
@zubinr9 The equal rank fight apllies only for Duel Fight !!!
artist1402 1 year ago
I just want to say one thing...people here are highlighting the fact that abhimanyu died because of a seven on one assualt but what about the normal soldiers...each and every maharathi on both sides were supposed to fight warriors of equal rank
zubinr9 2 years ago
they used the old ramayan music
str8desi 2 years ago
SuSharma is NOT Killed on 13th Day But, on 18th Day. It's Only Susharma's Brother Who gets Killed By Arjun on 13th Day
humbleRaj 2 years ago
28:33
ROFL
Akshayphadke 2 years ago
46:00
ROFLLLLLLLLLLL
HAHAHAHHAHA
Akshayphadke 2 years ago
He then tells Daruka: "There is no one that is as dear to Me as Arjuna..not even my wives and I shall not be able to see the earth even a day without Arjuna.
Tommorow if Arjuna will not be able to make it, I will blow the conch and you get the chariot. I shall slay the entire army of 21 Akshaunis and let Arjun fulfil his oath. I will end the war tommorow itself." For his devotees, Krishna can even take up defamy! But ofcourse in His case all negatives(like defamy) only glorifies Him :)
GokulWasi 2 years ago 3
wow man u know stuff
nice to meet u man.
Akshayphadke 2 years ago
Nice to meet u 2 man :). Such things I learnt from forums and also comments in youtube etc....indeed ve got to know a lot even from the Mahabharat comments here
GokulWasi 2 years ago 3
True bro
Akshayphadke 2 years ago
Buddy it should be 18 Akshounis, 11 from the Kaurava side and 7 from the Pandava side.
karthige79 2 years ago 2
Ohh I am sorry.....it was 11 Akshaunis and not 21..that's a typo :)...but He told that He would slay the entire opponent's army for Arjuna
Thanks for the correction
GokulWasi 2 years ago
WHen Arjun took the oath of slaying Jayadrath, Krishna's reaction to it was so touching that it still never fails to move me. He asks Arjun as to how he plans to do it for which Arjun says that with the weapons in his quiver and Krishna as his charioteer he will have no problem. Krishna walks out lost in deep thoughts...then He remembers Daruka, His charioteer who appears with His chariot and His grand horses, chakra etc.
GokulWasi 2 years ago
Jayadratha is now scared and he must be, because "arjun" has already took vow to introduce Jayadratha to his death before the very next sunset..
FYI: krishna will help arjun in this case
utubekhiladi 2 years ago
Comment removed
utubekhiladi 2 years ago
Arjun was killed by Babruvahan not because Arjun was incapable but because of a curse given by Ganga. She was infuriated by the fall of Bhishma because of Arjuna as Bhishma brought up Arjuna when he was a kid. So Ganga cursed Arjuna that he will be killed by Arjun's own son. However Krishna brought him back to life.
karthige79 2 years ago
Bheema defeated Karna in archery. It is mentioned in VedVyas Mahabharat. I don't remember if it is in the Drona Parva or Karna Parva. But I can guarantee it did happen according to the so called Vyas Mahabharath available today
karthige79 2 years ago
@karthige79 never
pujasur09 1 year ago
Divyaastras are not given to any Tom, Dick and Harry but only those who deserve it
karthige79 2 years ago
A person's strength and ability should also be measured by the Divyaastras he possesses as he worked hard to get the Divyaastras. It is like seeking for knowledge through severe penance, learn and acquire it. Keep in mind that knowing to use a Divyaastra is not a joke like what is shown in the serials. It requires a lot of concentration, mental ability, temparament, presence of mind and above all the ability to handle it.
karthige79 2 years ago
All Arjun bashers should watch the scene starting from 37:14
esrujan 2 years ago
abhimanyu was killed in chakravyuha ,in ckaravyuha a lone warrior is attacked by buch of warriors thats why it is worst feared arrangement in ancient times.
sitadriver 2 years ago
Kauravas, Karna, and Dhronacharya are a bunch of cowards.
jerichocosmosy2j 2 years ago
In this incident, may be... but saying such things to greatest warriors such as Drona and Karna is unfair...
I heard that among the 6 people,
Parashuram, Bhishm, Drona, Karna, Arjun and Abhimanyu... nobody can beat other in a fair one-one battle.... (w/o using Divyastras after which anything can happen)...... They are all the greatest archers in this epic and none of them should be INSULTED according to me....
esrujan 2 years ago
you are right,but parshuram got his invincible parshu.offcourse no one would have won.
sitadriver 2 years ago
They were great warriors but every one is defeatable even by fair means.
--Parashuram was about to be killed by Bhishma when he was about to use "Praswapa Asthra"--Bhishma was defeated by "Kalayavan" which is actually smothered in the Mahabharat.
--Drona and Karna were defeated by Arjun in Virata war.
--Karna was defeated by Bheema in archery in the final war
karthige79 2 years ago
Yeah.. But Bhishma was about to use Divyastr.. Same goes with Drona and Karna in Virata war.. But neways I think once Divyastra are used, it is definitely possible.
I doubt if ever Karna gets defeated by Bheema...... in archery... But I don't for sure though....
esrujan 2 years ago
Arjun was never defeated... And Karna fans shuld see minute 39, what is Karn who claims to be better than Arjun saying here? Can't he block Arjun? If he can not what was he claiming all through his life?
dullesfarm 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I could def have duryodhan in a one on one fist fight and i'll 100% take out karan too. arjun was great warrior but would be taken straight out by laxman and without the bow he wouldnt stand long in the ring against tyson
1RONLUNG999 2 years ago
:-) . Would have... Could have... speculations Vs History :-)
dullesfarm 2 years ago
Are you dumb or what
iaarl 2 years ago
you should be in the Olympics then....looking forward to see you sir!!
nitrai1991 2 years ago
@1RONLUNG999
Lets reserver your absolute absurd jokes for later part of the show can we??
ssvenks 2 years ago
--Arjun was defeated by Lord Shiva and and killed by Babruvan(his son). Of course he was brought back alive.
--There is no proof of Abhimanyu's defeat in one-on-one combat but I don't think that he was "Ajay"
karthige79 2 years ago
Is the war of Arjun vs Babruvan recorded in Vedavyas Mahabharat... can u tell me when did that happen..... Which Parva??
Abhimanyu neways does not have Divyastra... so he could have been defeated by the other people by using them..
esrujan 2 years ago
Babrubahan was a king Tripura and he happened to be a son of Arjun. The war between the legendary babru happened to be in Awmedha Yagna of Pandavas. He even killed arjun but there is Krishna to make alive back. Arjun denied Baru is not his son, he must be coward , the but hot blooded babru showed that he is really arjun's son.
ArjunsGandivArrow 2 years ago
Comment removed
dullesfarm 2 years ago
Comment removed
dullesfarm 2 years ago
reply to jerichococmosy2j: no doubt they were all great cowards! super cowards to fight a lone young warrior whom they themselves called 'baalak' - child!! shame on the 7 maharathi!! dont deserve to be called maharathis but napunsaks!!
shahkinghero 2 years ago 20
@shahkinghero I AM MUSLIM BUT I UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT THE RELIGION OF MY ANCESTORS. I WISH ABHIMANIYU WAS MY SON AND I COULD HAVE BEEN PROUDEST FATHER EVER. THIS BRAVE KID WAS MURDERED COWEREDLY. AND ALL THOSE WHO KILLED HIM WERE TO LOOSE RESPECT FOR EVER.
bily456 1 year ago 38
@ shahkinghero.... dude, you are correct. You have captured the true essence of the Mahabharat as an integral part of Indian culture and not just limited to the Hindus. May people of your understanding and intellect continue to grow....
Abhishek27 6 months ago
Comment removed
krishnathakkar61 6 months ago
@bily456 : your religion is not in your hand...it come with your birth.....!!! but respect every religion is the ISLAM..!!
I respect ISLAM even though I am hindu...!! respect you buddy
gaurangaero 4 months ago 5
@gaurangaero I totally agree with u and also I understand his feelings for Abhimanyu...Poor boy was killed so badly
psychoforam 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bily456 : your religion is not in your hand...it come with your birth.....!!! but respect every religion is the ISLAM..!!
I respect ISLAM even though I am hindu...!! respect you buddy
gaurangaero 4 months ago
@bily456 This boy Abhimanyu was killed mercilessly by others.....He was alone and was surrounded by many other warriors...Still her tried
psychoforam 1 week ago
@shahkinghero KKKKKK
bily456 1 year ago
mahabharat actually represents the pride, jealousy and ego of a great ruler who destroys and loses everything for nothing. (Duryodhan).
All dirty tricks are fair in warfare and politics. It does not matter how brave you are, as Mahabharat proves, the objective is to end the war as quickly as possible, by whatever means.
Reddy26 2 years ago
who told you that u should end war by watever means.. it says that there is nothing wrong in doing something wrong for doing something right.. pandavas are righteous and they are trying to follow their dharam by doing a lil bit adharam
johnsalman66 2 years ago 4
Winning war by whatever means is adharam. Through cunning and cheating, the Pandavas won the battle. The silly warfare rules in fact destroyed India since millions of men were wasted in open battle...
Reddy26 2 years ago
sau sach se eek juth accha agar woh kisi ki bhalai ke liye bola gaya ho. have u heard of that.. btw pandavas did wat sri krishna said and they did not do it coz they wanted a piece of land. they did it to fight against injustice done to them. they did it coz krishna advised them.. moreover, when a warrior does not stand on right side, he got no right to live coz a warrior's duty is to fight against injustice and not againsts right and justice
johnsalman66 2 years ago 2
dharma should be protected at all costs. that is wat pandavas did.. millions of warriors died coz they were fighting agianst injustice and some were fighting wid injustice.. hope u got wat i m tryin to say
johnsalman66 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There was no injustice. The Panduvas had no legal claim to the throne or any part of the kingdom.
Reddy26 2 years ago
hello!!. rightfully and even ethically yudhisthir was supposed to king hence duryodhan tried to kill him so many times.. after that they got indraprastha that too coz it was a vast barren land.. they made that place worth living and then they lost it.. they were suppose to complete 13 years in exile and get back their kingdom.. they did that.. so tell me where the hell do u think that they had to right over the throne
johnsalman66 2 years ago
@Reddy26
And moreover by your logic, even Dhritarashtra and Pandu should not have been kings as they are not biological sons of Vichitraveerya. The sons produced through the process become legal heirs to their foster fathers although their biological fathers are different.
Coming to tricks of Pandavas, as johnsalman66 explained, perhaps the lesson here is that one can deter from being moral 100 % of the time to save long term interests of Dharma in a larger way.
esrujan 2 years ago
so wat? they were atlest kings by half blood.. hence they were legal heirs as there was no one eligible for that. yup i agree wid the last line.. lol r u trying to say that duryodhan was on path of dharma and he was trying to protect dharma?
johnsalman66 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what NONSENCE ARE YOU TALKING rEDDY26?? PANDAVAS HAD NO LEGAL CLAIM YOU SAY?? THEN YOU ARE GOD!! YOU ARE BETTER THAN KRISHNA THEN!!??
shahkinghero 2 years ago
Love what Karna said to Abhimanyu's corpse. So sweet and heartfelt.
And Arjuna was so surprised! Haha..
Sad ep :( :(
sxcshal 2 years ago
well you need to remember what the mahabharat actually represents , the breakdown of all social order. the old order based on individual chivalry, exploited by the corrupt, the violent replacement of that by a sense of group ethic and larger good...
vikramkrishnan 2 years ago
everybody should learn this, it teaches us lot of good things as guru Drona said u should never satisfied with what u hav achieved, u should be good learner.
binayraj 3 years ago 3
so sad a warrior like abhimanyu gets killed by so many cowards!!
mpatel14 3 years ago 8
@mpatel14 wonder is how ShriKrishana know the evyr truth drove away with Arjun from PadmaVuh´! sure there must be a reason I am waiting to know !
wwinds 1 year ago
@wwinds
Lord Krishna had gievn Arjun a prompt advise but, Arjun did not heed to his advise and this is the result. This is my opinion
solusindica89 10 months ago
@mpatel14 Wonder if it is the same reason as Bhishma told Karna that he didn't allow him in war as he wanted to both live Arjun and Karna after the war as Hastinapur would get void or great warriors ! And Krishna just thaought something like against this truth ! and if, why ?
wwinds 1 year ago
it was this sacrifice of abhimanyu ... ( i guess Lord krishna knew this too ..) ..he told this in earlier episode that he was born such that one whole day would be written for him ..so it was..... because they didn't fought as per the rules of the game..... lord krishna decided ( later I guess) to themselves forget the rule ..tit for tat ...another trick of Lord Krishna ;)
kapildalwani 3 years ago 3
it was bhishma who decided rules
johnsalman66 2 years ago
I beleive Abhimanyu had a boon .... that nobody can defeat him by fighting headon mano-a-mano... so they all gangedup on him...It was his only way to gain moksha...anyways abhimanyu i salute you..
sidoghosh 3 years ago
no, abhimanyu had no such boon. he was strong enough for all of them if they fought the kid in one on one. Drona knew this. he was the only one who cried when shooting arrows at abhimanyu.
abhimanyu's death shown here is false. actually dushasana's son later crushed his skull with a mace when we was unconscious.
emperor0989 2 years ago
Abhimanyu didnot have self wish death in his hand unlike bhiesma..so to defeat that was the only way but Abhimanyu was just a kid infront of karna,Drona,Duryodhan and many more .Still they couldnt defeat him one on one(shameful)so I agree it totally ruined Dronas and karna's reputation so everthing became fair after this
Skyisunlimit 3 years ago
At last i understand the meaning of abimanyu's chakarvyu
Rikki420 3 years ago
I sometimes really wish that Arjuna ordered all the cowards to not pay respects to his son. I definitively would not let them even 100 ft within his body.
pratt123 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ah crap! then the same rule shud apply when dumb aurju killed great Bhishma by just cheat..
sara1511 3 years ago
yes I guess that was cheating too but Bhishma himself told Arjuna how to defeat him. So there. Abimanyu's death is completely different.
pratt123 3 years ago 2
I understand why you may feel frustrated or at odds with that. But, both were totally different situations, Arjun and Shree Ganga Puthar Bhisma were not only opponents, but even then loved each other deeply, so Bhisma and Abhaniyu's situation were different so have some respect and don't call great warriors dumb. thanks.
DaRealDeal2008 3 years ago 2
i do agree with your comment on Bhishma's killing matter but i feel that if there is any war than these ethics become useless
shashiawasthi 3 years ago
yeah I totally agree with you, that really pissed me off too.
DaRealDeal2008 3 years ago
what a tragic death. Clever of Krishna to let Abhimanyu die so that Drona, Karna, etc, etc have lost all the protection that their good deeds had given them until that point. From this point of the war, they were truly adharmic and thus destined to lose.
pratt123 3 years ago 6
i appreciate your deep understanding of lord krishna's logic
bdeeptibdeepti 3 years ago
Thank you dear..
listyawati 3 years ago
veer abhimanyu!
sadadosa85 3 years ago 15
great wariorr abhimanu.Brave i salute you
9811817177 3 years ago 14