Added: 3 years ago
From: rajshri
Views: 263,772
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (136)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Karna still had his Indra-Shakti at this time. He could have stood in front of Jayadratha, and used the Shakti against Arjun.

  • great acting by Arjun.

  • @shailee25 His name is Firoz Khan...and he is a proud Indian.....After this serial he changed his name to Arjun Firoz Khan

  • i agree Abhimaniyu was the great warrior of all... one man alone face 7 people

  • y krishan was looking surprize he should of known

  • jai shree krisna

  • Mahabharat has lots of bloody coward people.

    Shamelesspeople

  • asvasthama is stil alive many ppls have seen him in himalayas, as he is eternal

  • i am a true hindu and i respect every religion my head bows down infront of temple mosque church gurudwara or at any place where people worship the god almighty with true heart

    we all are indians frnds and even before that human beings let us be that first

  • my heart is aching...

  • how come  vansudev didn't go to war!

  • @prami2

    If vasudev wud go 2 war..they al wud hav died in an instant....but this is the msg wich v hav 2 learn...God is always there 2 support u..but u hav 2 fite ur own battles....do ur own karma..nt wait 4 God 2 do it 4 u...God can be our srength..but not our karta of our actions...

  • The bottom line is that Bruce Lee woulld have any of these mortal warriors with or without weapons. His training regime was far superior and not one of these warriors knew how to fight without weapons. Abhimanyu is the ultiate portrayal of a REAL MAN and that is the purpose of his character....but I have a feeling that Bruce wld have managed to exit the circle fairly easily. What does every1 think...pls comment?

  • @1RONLUNG999

    We really dont know how far the depiction of this Great War is on par with the One that really happened and so I cannot comment or compare these two great warriors.

  • infact the day when jaydrath was killed was the fiercest battle of the mahabharata. Arjuna was so devastating on the kaurava army where he single handedly destroys 2 akshaunis. Arjuna was the only factor which the Kauravas feared. But more than him, It was definetely Lord Krishna who called all the shots.

  • wow what a great warrior abhimanyu is. he is also known as veerabhimanyu. all these cowards killed him. he doesn't know how to come out of chakravyuh. this leads to karna's demice

  • it's awesome i don't have enough word to exeplain my feelings

  • Dharma always wins...jai shri krishna

  • i loved the way how krishna comforted arjun!!! a real gyani friend!! I love Krishna

  • Krishna took Arjun away from Chakravyooh because Karan is waiting inside with his Vaijayanthi (Shakti given by Devendra). Arjun can easily break up the Chakravyooh, but the end would have been disasterous for Arjun himself. So, first Abhimanyu And then Ghatotkatch were sacrificed for Arjun's sake. After all, Arjun to phir Arjun Hain.

  • @generalchathans if what u say is correct, then how comes on the following day, when Arjun was ifiltrating the kaurava army looking for Jayadrath, he came face to face with Karan who tried to stop Arjun from entering. Karan couldn't even use thhat so called shakti on him then, but instead got defeated by Arjun. Explain that. I don't think yourr theory is correct. On the 13th day, Krishna actually told Arjun not to stray far from Yudhisthir, but Arjun's warrior pride got the better of him.

  • Duryodhan again at  30: 48..ahahahhahah.. hardcore disrespect..

  • AT 29:08 minutes Duryodhan-"iske baad tumhari barri hai"- ahahhhahaha...

  • Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!

  • arjune ne sabse pehle nihatthe bheeshm pe ban chalaya tha.

  • why is my comment written in devnagri not displayed??? you tube do u hav an answer?

  • Comment removed

  • Draupati Vast Haran and Abhimanyu's Killing were two main events that made Mahabharat.

    The first one started it and the second one ended it.

  • @bhasinuscuscable Killing Bhishmapitamah by cheating was somehow justifiable as he himself mentioned it because he came in the Battlefield with the ItchaMrityu Kawach!!! Once again , don't forget that even if he told Pandav how he can be defeated, he also told Duryodhan in which way they can protect him!!!

  • @bhasinuscuscable my dr friend you seem to forget that it was Duryodhan who started this CHEATING process!!! Remember how he got the Second best Charioteer, King Shalya on his side!!! Concerning the dual between Bhina and Duryodhan. Isn't it CHEATING to have a dual fight with an added protection ( The boon that his Mother Gandhari gave him) ??? Even Arjun had Divyasatra, but he never used them during the Kurukshetra!!!

  • salute to abhimanu

  • Thank you Rajshri for uploading I loved it still and we'll still be the very best epic I've ever seen and will be the best I've ever seen jai hind

  • abe hindi me bolo sab angrezi bolni jaruri hain yaha pe bhi

  • @9711ALI abey, angrezi to angrezi hi tho hotha hain, ye tho angrezi ka web hain

  • @hcpspilakarb to bhai hinglish bolo not pure english :)

  • @9711ALI teekh hain saab!

  • this episode makes it appear as if ABhimanyu was the only person ever killed in Kurukshetra. Just to generate sympathy for the Pandavas

  • I think the Abhimanyu episode will shut the mouth of all those who said anything about dharma not being on Pandava side.

  • From this point of the war, they were truly adharmic and thus destined to lose.

  • Abimanyu death may have been a blessing. So Arjun can actually now focus on the war ????

  • Abimanyu broke his brahmacharya- see the price he had to pay!!

  • Karna is kayar. first he does work like kayar and then asks for forgiveness!

  • kayar tries to find excuses, not ask for forgiveness

  • Well, he was a demon in his last life. The important lesson that you are missing is that he repented for his mistakes.

    That doesn't mean he won't be punished but the repentance is what separates him from say, Jadradath. (yes, my spelling sucks).

    People tell lies all the time but how many people actually regret doing so each time?

    Not many, I bet. What I am saying is that a person's negative traits do not cancel out his positive traits and vice versa. A liar can still be a saint, etc.

  • I hope you don't think that I am apologizing for Karna's actions. For me, Abimanyu's death justifies all the rule-breaking ways that Drona, Karna, etc. die (Drona is unarmed, Karna is lifting chariot wheel).

    Unfair deaths but they had it coming after hacking a young boy into pieces from all sides.

  • yeah I 100% agree with you frnd

  • i.e. Maharathi vs Maharathi...but we see warriors from both camps flouting this rule from day 1 itself for eg.Arjun killing 10-100 normal foot-soldiers by firing a single arrows using mantras...WAS THAT FAIR??? If not,all this talk about unfair means is totally useless because in war it is impossible to follow such rules and gain victory.But,Ofcourse,Pandavas deserved the victory.

  • yeah, the rules are pretty fuzzy.

  • you understand diff between 1 killing Many and Many killing 1?

  • @zubinr9 The equal rank fight apllies only for Duel Fight !!!

  • I just want to say one thing...people here are highlighting the fact that abhimanyu died because of a seven on one assualt but what about the normal soldiers...each and every maharathi on both sides were supposed to fight warriors of equal rank

  • they used the old ramayan music

  • SuSharma is NOT Killed on 13th Day But, on 18th Day. It's Only Susharma's Brother Who gets Killed By Arjun on 13th Day

  • 28:33

    ROFL

  • 46:00

    ROFLLLLLLLLLLL

    HAHAHAHHAHA

  • He then tells Daruka: "There is no one that is as dear to Me as Arjuna..not even my wives and I shall not be able to see the earth even a day without Arjuna.

    Tommorow if Arjuna will not be able to make it, I will blow the conch and you get the chariot. I shall slay the entire army of 21 Akshaunis and let Arjun fulfil his oath. I will end the war tommorow itself." For his devotees, Krishna can even take up defamy! But ofcourse in His case all negatives(like defamy) only glorifies Him :)

  • wow man u know stuff

    nice to meet u man.

  • Nice to meet u 2 man :). Such things I learnt from forums and also comments in youtube etc....indeed ve got to know a lot even from the Mahabharat comments here

  • True bro

  • Buddy it should be 18 Akshounis, 11 from the Kaurava side and 7 from the Pandava side.

  • Ohh I am sorry.....it was 11 Akshaunis and not 21..that's a typo :)...but He told that He would slay the entire opponent's army for Arjuna

     Thanks for the correction

  • WHen Arjun took the oath of slaying Jayadrath, Krishna's reaction to it was so touching that it still never fails to move me. He asks Arjun as to how he plans to do it for which Arjun says that with the weapons in his quiver and Krishna as his charioteer he will have no problem. Krishna walks out lost in deep thoughts...then He remembers Daruka, His charioteer who appears with His chariot and His grand horses, chakra etc.

  • Jayadratha is now scared and he must be, because "arjun" has already took vow to introduce Jayadratha to his death before the very next sunset..

    FYI: krishna will help arjun in this case

  • Comment removed

  • Arjun was killed by Babruvahan not because Arjun was incapable but because of a curse given by Ganga. She was infuriated by the fall of Bhishma because of Arjuna as Bhishma brought up Arjuna when he was a kid. So Ganga cursed Arjuna that he will be killed by Arjun's own son. However Krishna brought him back to life.

  • Bheema defeated Karna in archery. It is mentioned in VedVyas Mahabharat. I don't remember if it is in the Drona Parva or Karna Parva. But I can guarantee it did happen according to the so called Vyas Mahabharath available today

  • @karthige79  never

  • Divyaastras are not given to any Tom, Dick and Harry but only those who deserve it

  • A person's strength and ability should also be measured by the Divyaastras he possesses as he worked hard to get the Divyaastras. It is like seeking for knowledge through severe penance, learn and acquire it. Keep in mind that knowing to use a Divyaastra is not a joke like what is shown in the serials. It requires a lot of concentration, mental ability, temparament, presence of mind and above all the ability to handle it.

  • All Arjun bashers should watch the scene starting from 37:14

  • abhimanyu was killed in chakravyuha ,in ckaravyuha a lone warrior is attacked by buch of warriors thats why it is worst feared arrangement in ancient times.

  • Kauravas, Karna, and Dhronacharya are a bunch of cowards.

  • In this incident, may be... but saying such things to greatest warriors such as Drona and Karna is unfair...

    I heard that among the 6 people,

    Parashuram, Bhishm, Drona, Karna, Arjun and Abhimanyu... nobody can beat other in a fair one-one battle.... (w/o using Divyastras after which anything can happen)...... They are all the greatest archers in this epic and none of them should be INSULTED according to me....

  • you are right,but parshuram got his invincible parshu.offcourse no one would have won.

  • They were great warriors but every one is defeatable even by fair means.

    --Parashuram was about to be killed by Bhishma when he was about to use "Praswapa Asthra"--Bhishma was defeated by "Kalayavan" which is actually smothered in the Mahabharat.

    --Drona and Karna were defeated by Arjun in Virata war.

    --Karna was defeated by Bheema in archery in the final war

  • Yeah.. But Bhishma was about to use Divyastr.. Same goes with Drona and Karna in Virata war.. But neways I think once Divyastra are used, it is definitely possible.

    I doubt if ever Karna gets defeated by Bheema...... in archery... But I don't for sure though....

  • Arjun was never defeated... And Karna fans shuld see minute 39, what is Karn who claims to be better than Arjun saying here? Can't he block Arjun? If he can not what was he claiming all through his life?

  • :-) . Would have... Could have... speculations Vs History :-)

  • Are you dumb or what

  • you should be in the Olympics then....looking forward to see you sir!!

  • @1RONLUNG999

    Lets reserver your absolute absurd jokes for later part of the show can we??

  • --Arjun was defeated by Lord Shiva and and killed by Babruvan(his son). Of course he was brought back alive.

    --There is no proof of Abhimanyu's defeat in one-on-one combat but I don't think that he was "Ajay"

  • Is the war of Arjun vs Babruvan recorded in Vedavyas Mahabharat... can u tell me when did that happen..... Which Parva??

    Abhimanyu neways does not have Divyastra... so he could have been defeated by the other people by using them..

  • Babrubahan was a king Tripura and he happened to be a son of Arjun. The war between the legendary babru happened to be in Awmedha Yagna of Pandavas. He even killed arjun but there is Krishna to make alive back. Arjun denied Baru is not his son, he must be coward , the but hot blooded babru showed that he is really arjun's son.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • reply to jerichococmosy2j: no doubt they were all great cowards! super cowards to fight a lone young warrior whom they themselves called 'baalak' - child!! shame on the 7 maharathi!! dont deserve to be called maharathis but napunsaks!!

  • @shahkinghero  I AM MUSLIM BUT I UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT THE RELIGION OF MY ANCESTORS. I WISH ABHIMANIYU WAS MY SON AND I COULD HAVE BEEN PROUDEST FATHER EVER. THIS BRAVE KID WAS MURDERED COWEREDLY. AND ALL THOSE WHO KILLED HIM WERE TO LOOSE RESPECT FOR EVER.

  • @ shahkinghero.... dude, you are correct. You have captured the true essence of the Mahabharat as an integral part of Indian culture and not just limited to the Hindus. May people of your understanding and intellect continue to grow....

  • Comment removed

  • @bily456 : your religion is not in your hand...it come with your birth.....!!! but respect every religion is the ISLAM..!!

    I respect ISLAM even though I am hindu...!! respect you buddy

  • @gaurangaero I totally agree with u and also I understand his feelings for Abhimanyu...Poor boy was killed so badly

  • @bily456 This boy Abhimanyu was killed mercilessly by others.....He was alone and was surrounded by many other warriors...Still her tried

  • @shahkinghero KKKKKK

  • mahabharat actually represents the pride, jealousy and ego of a great ruler who destroys and loses everything for nothing. (Duryodhan).

    All dirty tricks are fair in warfare and politics. It does not matter how brave you are, as Mahabharat proves, the objective is to end the war as quickly as possible, by whatever means.

  • who told you that u should end war by watever means.. it says that there is nothing wrong in doing something wrong for doing something right.. pandavas are righteous and they are trying to follow their dharam by doing a lil bit adharam

  • Winning war by whatever means is adharam. Through cunning and cheating, the Pandavas won the battle. The silly warfare rules in fact destroyed India since millions of men were wasted in open battle...

  • sau sach se eek juth accha agar woh kisi ki bhalai ke liye bola gaya ho. have u heard of that.. btw pandavas did wat sri krishna said and they did not do it coz they wanted a piece of land. they did it to fight against injustice done to them. they did it coz krishna advised them.. moreover, when a warrior does not stand on right side, he got no right to live coz a warrior's duty is to fight against injustice and not againsts right and justice

  • dharma should be protected at all costs. that is wat pandavas did.. millions of warriors died coz they were fighting agianst injustice and some were fighting wid injustice.. hope u got wat i m tryin to say

  • hello!!. rightfully and even ethically yudhisthir was supposed to king hence duryodhan tried to kill him so many times.. after that they got indraprastha that too coz it was a vast barren land.. they made that place worth living and then they lost it.. they were suppose to complete 13 years in exile and get back their kingdom.. they did that.. so tell me where the hell do u think that they had to right over the throne

  • @Reddy26

    And moreover by your logic, even Dhritarashtra and Pandu should not have been kings as they are not biological sons of Vichitraveerya. The sons produced through the process become legal heirs to their foster fathers although their biological fathers are different.

    Coming to tricks of Pandavas, as johnsalman66 explained, perhaps the lesson here is that one can deter from being moral 100 % of the time to save long term interests of Dharma in a larger way.

  • so wat? they were atlest kings by half blood.. hence they were legal heirs as there was no one eligible for that. yup i agree wid the last line.. lol r u trying to say that duryodhan was on path of dharma and he was trying to protect dharma?

  • Love what Karna said to Abhimanyu's corpse. So sweet and heartfelt.

    And Arjuna was so surprised! Haha..

    Sad ep :( :(

  • well you need to remember what the mahabharat actually represents , the breakdown of all social order. the old order based on individual chivalry, exploited by the corrupt, the violent replacement of that by a sense of group ethic and larger good...

  • everybody should learn this, it teaches us lot of good things as guru Drona said u should never satisfied with what u hav achieved, u should be good learner.

  • so sad a warrior like abhimanyu gets killed by so many cowards!!

  • @mpatel14 wonder is how ShriKrishana know the evyr truth drove away with Arjun from PadmaVuh´! sure there must be a reason I am waiting to know !

  • @wwinds

    Lord Krishna had gievn Arjun a prompt advise but, Arjun did not heed to his advise and this is the result. This is my opinion

  • @mpatel14 Wonder if it is the same reason as Bhishma told Karna that he didn't allow him in war as he wanted to both live Arjun and Karna after the war as Hastinapur would get void or great warriors ! And Krishna just thaought something like against this truth ! and if, why ?

  • it was this sacrifice of abhimanyu ... ( i guess Lord krishna knew this too ..) ..he told this in earlier episode that he was born such that one whole day would be written for him ..so it was..... because they didn't fought as per the rules of the game..... lord krishna decided ( later I guess) to themselves forget the rule ..tit for tat ...another trick of Lord Krishna ;)

  • it was bhishma who decided rules

  • I beleive Abhimanyu had a boon .... that nobody can defeat him by fighting headon mano-a-mano... so they all gangedup on him...It was his only way to gain moksha...anyways abhimanyu i salute you..

  • no, abhimanyu had no such boon. he was strong enough for all of them if they fought the kid in one on one. Drona knew this. he was the only one who cried when shooting arrows at abhimanyu.

    abhimanyu's death shown here is false. actually dushasana's son later crushed his skull with a mace when we was unconscious.

  • Abhimanyu didnot have self wish death in his hand unlike bhiesma..so to defeat that was the only way but Abhimanyu was just a kid infront of karna,Drona,Duryodhan and many more .Still they couldnt defeat him one on one(shameful)so I agree it totally ruined Dronas and karna's reputation so everthing became fair after this

  • At last i understand the meaning of abimanyu's chakarvyu

  • I sometimes really wish that Arjuna ordered all the cowards to not pay respects to his son. I definitively would not let them even 100 ft within his body.

  • yes I guess that was cheating too but Bhishma himself told Arjuna how to defeat him. So there. Abimanyu's death is completely different.

  • I understand why you may feel frustrated or at odds with that. But, both were totally different situations, Arjun and Shree Ganga Puthar Bhisma were not only opponents, but even then loved each other deeply, so Bhisma and Abhaniyu's situation were different so have some respect and don't call great warriors dumb. thanks.

  • i do agree with your comment on Bhishma's killing matter but i feel that if there is any war than these ethics become useless

  • yeah I totally agree with you, that really pissed me off too.

  • what a tragic death. Clever of Krishna to let Abhimanyu die so that Drona, Karna, etc, etc have lost all the protection that their good deeds had given them until that point. From this point of the war, they were truly adharmic and thus destined to lose.

  • i appreciate your deep understanding of lord krishna's logic

  • Thank you dear..

  • veer abhimanyu!

  • great wariorr abhimanu.Brave i salute you

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more