I thought that Sony is better than Canons. but after ive done some research in the internet, i already know that Canon is the leader in photography and videos. Sony sucks
This is only directed at the dumbasses that bitch about Americans.
I find it hysterical that some non-Americans bitch about Americans while using our technology... If you hate us so much, come up with your own shit, and quit relying on us...
If it weren't for America you dumbasses would still be communicating with pen and paper... (since we also invented radio, telephone, TV, and fax etc.)
You guys need to start pulling your weight instead of bitching about us. Fucking Retards.
So i'm wondering weither to get a Sony or a Canon. Currently i have an HDRCX100 by sony and it's alright for the little i use it but i'm progressively getting more into film and my need's for a better camcorder are coming nearer and nearer. By searching i'm personally finding that Canon makes crisper more vibrant videos which is what i'm looking for and Sony does but way way way way more expensive.
@Lypur okay, well thanks. I think though, that my next camera won't be for a while because the videos i make work just fine with this one, but when i get more involved i'm planning on buying a really good quality prosumer camera. Do you know any good ones? I heard panasonic makes pretty good ones.
What's the difference between the HF11 and the HF S11? The first one costs $735 and the sencond one $1350, both in Amazon. However I can't find the reason for the second one to cost almost twice as much!
batoobah: Just got off the phone with Canon, the S stands for: Series...The HF 11 ony has 32 GB of memory, whereas the HF S11 has 64 GB. There are probably a few more uprades other than too. Sp basically the Sversions are a higher end model. Hope that helps.
i think the picture looks better on the sony... it looks sharper and bolder... the canon seems to be a bit faded... bot the canon seems to have it beat in sound? It's a close one...
@otterboxiphone Like that hasn't been said before. Can foreigners come up with new material? I mean there is other shit about US that people can make fun of except for that. And I know the account is closed.
And besides, it's way better to compare camcorders by their opreation and features. Sony has much better stabilization, which is great if you film anything where you are moving. Driving f.e
I think Sony and Canon don't put Optical Stabilization in these cams..
Software stabilization sucks..I mean it..It's not reliable..On the contary, it makes video looks rough n pixelate..This is what I really hate from Sony..
You are talking out of your ass. The Sony XR500 I have, has so-called active optical stabilization, which does not at all make the video quality worse, it just makes it extremely stable. Why do you spread bullshit info on something you don't know anything about?
Then buy a better model. On one hand you complain about the lack of image stabilization, on the other you complain (falsely) about the "poor" OIS on better models...
The OIS on the Canon HF S10 and S100 sucks compared to the competition, and none of them competes with the amazing stability of Sony's Steadyshot technology found in XR500 and XR520.
I agree Magoo. How can two camcorders be compared like for like after the video has been converted on a computer and then uploaded to YouTube to be compressed further. The only way to compare them would be to have them both in your hand and look at the raw uncompressed files.
I have since found out that my graphics card was the problem. I have a Pentium 4 Dual 3.2 GHZ with 4 meg of ram . I didn't think I needed a decent card at the time. My problem at this point is those people looking at my videos on YouTube don't have enough computer to watch. So I'm back to using SD videos.
Def HF100 for me! Colors are better and motion test was less choppy with it. I got a Sony 3.5" DVD camcorder right now and it makes way to much noise while recording. The only time you hear noise though, is during playback. Less moving parts is good.
I think canon Vixia HF100 is better than sony's HDR-Cx12. The colors are so different from each other. Canon has got all the vivid color while the other does not. Horray to canon Vixia HF100.
The difference in quality is very small and it's just a matter of taste I think. I like the Sony because it can also record in SD if needed and SD quality is much better than any previous SD models. In exchange, I don't like the glossy black finish, I hope this trend won't last too long! :)
I have the Vixia HF100 and love it but I noticed when I'm editing or using any of the players its pretty choppy. Its great when sent to YouTube. Whats with the choppy playback?
Your computer might not be fast enough. Many people end up converting it to mpeg4 or mpeg2 even. With enough bit rate you can't tell the difference (almost).
The colours are warmer and much more realistic I think at the beach. However I think the green grass may be too saturated. The Canon colours look more true to life to me on the bridge too.
don't forget, the HF100 has a cinema mode too, where it changes to 24 fps and automatically changes the color and tonal characteristics to match that of films.
Just bought the Canon Vixia HF100 on newegg i couldnt find one bad review on this item really looking forward to trying it out. I've had sonys in the past and both times they went bad shortly after the warrenty expired and their customer service was a nightmare to deal with.
I don't think so, because the tape motor makes a buzzing wizzing noise. So sound is better on the HF100. It's also smaller, and no moving parts except for lens. HF100 seems like the winner to me.
my favourite camcorder is Sony HDR-SR12..No Canon Vixia and No Sony CX12 ...if you want to buy a camcorder then buy Sony HDR-SR12 ...I think its the best FullHD Camcorder ...
How difficult would you say it is to take videos shot on the Canon Vixia and convert them for upload/playback on YouTube or the average computer? I've heard that the hi-def files are very intense to download, edit, and convert. Is it easy to burn DVDs as well?
They both look so crappy on YouTube, I find it amusing that anybody would even try to draw any conclusions from watching this (here, anyway). It would be better to glue the vids side-by-side and then put them on some higher-fidelity site like Vimeo.
actually you will be disappointed if you try to shot some action like a formula 1 race or being in a car that doing more that 140 mph,i liked this cam and loved the resolution but when i try to record my speedo dials in one of my cars after i pass the 140 mph i get this blue screen and this message about over buffer thing then stops recording,so i don't know if this happens with the canon or not,enjoy and good luck.
ha ha hah,loved that part of the message anyway,the cam was fixed in a interior cam mount so it does not shake at all,and when i said a formula 1 i mean when you are watching the race from a distance as soon as you record it will give you the same blue screen also if you're with a band that plays music very high you will still get the same thing!!
From your site:"How many times would you have shot in HD then wished you shot in SD?" If I wish to record a conference i would definitely do it on SD ;D
I thought that Sony is better than Canons. but after ive done some research in the internet, i already know that Canon is the leader in photography and videos. Sony sucks
jade5631 4 weeks ago
Hey i have a review of the canon vixia r100. Its hd and pc and mac compatible check it out!
Spasmodicstudios 1 year ago
This is only directed at the dumbasses that bitch about Americans.
I find it hysterical that some non-Americans bitch about Americans while using our technology... If you hate us so much, come up with your own shit, and quit relying on us...
If it weren't for America you dumbasses would still be communicating with pen and paper... (since we also invented radio, telephone, TV, and fax etc.)
You guys need to start pulling your weight instead of bitching about us. Fucking Retards.
ThumpMonkeyFunk 1 year ago 5
@ThumpMonkeyFunk Actually Canada invented the telephone...
waytomuchsparetime 1 year ago
@waytomuchsparetime... You're right, I stand corrected... but my point still stands.
ThumpMonkeyFunk 1 year ago
@waytomuchsparetime USA created telegram w/out the telegram there would be no telephone
legaCsk8er4 1 year ago
i think canon vixia is better
RockPop1337 1 year ago
Right off the bat I could see the Canon is better. There's no hot chick in a bikini in the lower left with the Sony.
paulybxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 1 year ago
Canon sucks it has that annoying yellow tint.
7tylerjb 1 year ago
@7tylerjb canon is the best in photography and videos. Sony sucks. this video only proves that Canons are better in Sonys
jade5631 4 weeks ago
Canon all the way!!
pwashington99 1 year ago
Hi, do you have footage of the bridge in 23.976fps?
CubeLuda 1 year ago
So i'm wondering weither to get a Sony or a Canon. Currently i have an HDRCX100 by sony and it's alright for the little i use it but i'm progressively getting more into film and my need's for a better camcorder are coming nearer and nearer. By searching i'm personally finding that Canon makes crisper more vibrant videos which is what i'm looking for and Sony does but way way way way more expensive.
Hyminym 1 year ago
@Hyminym When I first started looking for camera's I was contemplating the same thing. I started with sony as well, but I found Canon was excellent.
Lypur 1 year ago
@Lypur okay, well thanks. I think though, that my next camera won't be for a while because the videos i make work just fine with this one, but when i get more involved i'm planning on buying a really good quality prosumer camera. Do you know any good ones? I heard panasonic makes pretty good ones.
Hyminym 1 year ago
Is it me or the vixia loocks better ?
it has wider angle of view and the greens are briter ,the wind noise is not loud .
PaintBallM3n 1 year ago 2
jo
i like both cameras
the only different between them is that the canon has a bigger wid angle
ToastyskateTV 1 year ago
lC lA lN lO lN
Dylan4262 1 year ago
will canon has a silent sound that purture the sound wave quality then the sony sound wave
hmng2piano 1 year ago
mmm.. i used to have a canon and sony.. i loved the canon. but both of them died :(.
which one should i get for bet concert quality and which model? help me please!!!:)
natloveralex 2 years ago
I'm normally a sony guy...but CANON has best picture!
LeonardGee 2 years ago 2
canon
robobobo771 2 years ago 13
Canon all the way
I'm about to buy one. However I have a question:
What's the difference between the HF11 and the HF S11? The first one costs $735 and the sencond one $1350, both in Amazon. However I can't find the reason for the second one to cost almost twice as much!
batoobah 2 years ago
batoobah: Just got off the phone with Canon, the S stands for: Series...The HF 11 ony has 32 GB of memory, whereas the HF S11 has 64 GB. There are probably a few more uprades other than too. Sp basically the Sversions are a higher end model. Hope that helps.
REFORMEDSTUDIOS 2 years ago
I don't have a preference for either one of these camcorders, but the Canon is clearer and sharper compared to the Sony cam.
Biodude377 2 years ago
canon is better. it's clear and vivid. the sony video looks darker.
jakeychan87 2 years ago 4
@lockers4you
you can still get it
HorsePlayProductions 2 years ago
stopped making it. But the hf200 is the same thing but it has 32g built in memory and its black
Chipstastegood 2 years ago
i think the picture looks better on the sony... it looks sharper and bolder... the canon seems to be a bit faded... bot the canon seems to have it beat in sound? It's a close one...
dboyd1089 2 years ago
Sony doesn't have a wind guard?
iLLipino04 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
US is full of fat people.
otterboxiphone 2 years ago 20
@otterboxiphone we prefer our women thick. We don't like fucking sticks.
onebadgs400 2 years ago
haha chubby chaser!
Kicksalotofassasarus 1 year ago
@otterboxiphone but goodlooking people
carolinebernardo34 1 year ago
@otterboxiphone and you wish you could be in the U.S.A.
poolboyinla 1 year ago
@otterboxiphone Your fat ass lesbian hooker you piece of shit
TRAMAeagle 1 year ago
@otterboxiphone yeah fat fuck retards, Dats america for you
bnjw2 1 year ago
@otterboxiphone Like that hasn't been said before. Can foreigners come up with new material? I mean there is other shit about US that people can make fun of except for that. And I know the account is closed.
RetroZombieee 1 year ago
CANON ROCKS!
IpodAppsEverywhere 2 years ago
Canon FTW!!
ElPandaDeLaAccion 2 years ago
canon overrules sony
newandimproved100 2 years ago
Vixia, i think, has better video quality and sound quality.
xXMercifulFallXx 2 years ago
Sony sucks A LOT, just have brand. I have a Sony Sr62 and it sucks a lot, even my videos made from a Canon A620 digital camera are better!
equiz 2 years ago
I like the canon better just because the colors look more natural than the sony.
VC79JN89 2 years ago 4
and what accessories do you have on them if any?
DirectThis1 2 years ago
what setting is the cameras on?
DirectThis1 2 years ago
Well, i liked more the Canon color a motion is far more sooth also. I don't hve any of these. Just checking.
namrur2 2 years ago
I have the latest Sony HDD Camcorder..its video quality sucks...I mean it.....Canon is the best. I always trust Canon.
But it seems that Canon won't make HDD Camcorder like JVC, Sony and Panasonic..
rakaryan06 2 years ago
Which one do you have?
And besides, it's way better to compare camcorders by their opreation and features. Sony has much better stabilization, which is great if you film anything where you are moving. Driving f.e
crockettburnett 2 years ago
I think Sony and Canon don't put Optical Stabilization in these cams..
Software stabilization sucks..I mean it..It's not reliable..On the contary, it makes video looks rough n pixelate..This is what I really hate from Sony..
rakaryan06 2 years ago
You are talking out of your ass. The Sony XR500 I have, has so-called active optical stabilization, which does not at all make the video quality worse, it just makes it extremely stable. Why do you spread bullshit info on something you don't know anything about?
crockettburnett 2 years ago 2
Sony DCR-SR100 doesn't have optical image stabilization..It sucks..
rakaryan06 2 years ago
Then buy a better model. On one hand you complain about the lack of image stabilization, on the other you complain (falsely) about the "poor" OIS on better models...
The OIS on the Canon HF S10 and S100 sucks compared to the competition, and none of them competes with the amazing stability of Sony's Steadyshot technology found in XR500 and XR520.
crockettburnett 2 years ago
I did buy a better model. It's Canon..
I don't care what you like..I Like Canon. Period
rakaryan06 2 years ago
What about the Canon VIXIA SDHC HD Camcorder: HF200
elitecssplayer 2 years ago
are you complementing the Canon HD Vixia HF100 or ?
dphamFILMS 2 years ago
You can clearly see that Canon is better by the color, sound, lighing etc.
cat325ccr 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
Zebio15 2 years ago
i bet you could change the color setting on both of them to make them look the same
Zebio15 2 years ago 13
No doubt Canon won and has better color and picture.
vincnet11 2 years ago
In the last test the cx-12 looked better
bieto420 2 years ago
No it didn't.
The Canon was much more refreshing and bright.
joelp44 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol the handycam gives a more natural video. the canon sucks, and its only a dinky 3 megapixel still.. waste....
MikeTorre357 2 years ago
i have the vixia, its way better
McDonaldsPranker 2 years ago 2
sony hdr cx 12 great number one...... but canon vixia hf 100 ( good only )
methwo 2 years ago
I agree Magoo. How can two camcorders be compared like for like after the video has been converted on a computer and then uploaded to YouTube to be compressed further. The only way to compare them would be to have them both in your hand and look at the raw uncompressed files.
EverywhereVirtually 2 years ago 4
Maybe HDR-CX12 looks bad because the girl on the bottom left disappeared...lol
ThatoneguyDennis21 2 years ago 3
color correction can make the sony look just like the canon
AMGBenz95 2 years ago 3
I have since found out that my graphics card was the problem. I have a Pentium 4 Dual 3.2 GHZ with 4 meg of ram . I didn't think I needed a decent card at the time. My problem at this point is those people looking at my videos on YouTube don't have enough computer to watch. So I'm back to using SD videos.
imanutnur7 3 years ago
Def HF100 for me! Colors are better and motion test was less choppy with it. I got a Sony 3.5" DVD camcorder right now and it makes way to much noise while recording. The only time you hear noise though, is during playback. Less moving parts is good.
AftermathXJ220 3 years ago
I thing none of us can judge about the two camcorders from just looking at this video, because we may not forget that this is youtube quality!
Edckars 3 years ago 3
I think canon Vixia HF100 is better than sony's HDR-Cx12. The colors are so different from each other. Canon has got all the vivid color while the other does not. Horray to canon Vixia HF100.
ariez2000 3 years ago 2
The difference in quality is very small and it's just a matter of taste I think. I like the Sony because it can also record in SD if needed and SD quality is much better than any previous SD models. In exchange, I don't like the glossy black finish, I hope this trend won't last too long! :)
FlorinU 3 years ago
The Canon can record AVCHD to SD or internal memory at a rate of 24mbps (the same bitrate as HDV)
TangyPenis 3 years ago
I have the Vixia HF100 and love it but I noticed when I'm editing or using any of the players its pretty choppy. Its great when sent to YouTube. Whats with the choppy playback?
imanutnur7 3 years ago
Your computer might not be fast enough. Many people end up converting it to mpeg4 or mpeg2 even. With enough bit rate you can't tell the difference (almost).
a1mint 3 years ago
there's no windcut in the sony camcorder
mysteryx294 3 years ago
Canon Vixia HF11 is a lot better!
Gradius0 3 years ago
How so?
a1mint 3 years ago
The colours are warmer and much more realistic I think at the beach. However I think the green grass may be too saturated. The Canon colours look more true to life to me on the bridge too.
TangyPenis 3 years ago
No expert but Canon looks better to my eyes!
philangst1 3 years ago
don't forget, the HF100 has a cinema mode too, where it changes to 24 fps and automatically changes the color and tonal characteristics to match that of films.
BulldozerLemon 3 years ago
shit, the canon kicks azz!
mexicanfrusciante 3 years ago 3
Just bought the Canon Vixia HF100 on newegg i couldnt find one bad review on this item really looking forward to trying it out. I've had sonys in the past and both times they went bad shortly after the warrenty expired and their customer service was a nightmare to deal with.
MartinGuitarLover1 3 years ago 2
Some people need glasses here, clearly the Canon HF100 is almost twice as clear and color saturation better than the Sony.
What company manufactue their Lenses? Canon.
What Company does elecronics ans PS3? Sony.
Don't get confused people, Canon its a specialized Camera and camcorder company.
gerry1976 3 years ago
is the canon vixia hv30 better than this canon camera?
lightmydank 3 years ago
I don't think so, because the tape motor makes a buzzing wizzing noise. So sound is better on the HF100. It's also smaller, and no moving parts except for lens. HF100 seems like the winner to me.
a1mint 3 years ago 2
well as u can clearley see he favors the cannon..well he yoused it 1st youshily in more sunlight.remeber they can be adjusted!
Blaze0820 3 years ago
OMG, thank you so much. This is exactly what I needed to see.
MelaniePortrip 3 years ago 4
Bummer, the Canon has better color saturation and I just bought the Sony CX-12.
: (
glenwoodfin 3 years ago
Cannon hf100 is the cam, hands down.
noel646 3 years ago
Both cams need to adjust the White Balance. To me Sony is the best one.
MesquitaTV 3 years ago
When I compared the 2, the image stabilizer was far better on the cannon
varvorines 3 years ago
cx-12 looks the best to me.
Jacc0s 3 years ago
Sonys a joke
ScottLewisNJ 3 years ago
Canon is better....:)
leodino000 3 years ago
my favourite camcorder is Sony HDR-SR12..No Canon Vixia and No Sony CX12 ...if you want to buy a camcorder then buy Sony HDR-SR12 ...I think its the best FullHD Camcorder ...
bibopennah9999 3 years ago
but Sony hdr-cx12 is better than sr12. cx12 has a smile shutter while sr12 doesn't!!!(altough it uses hard disk drive instead of memory card)
flying1109 3 years ago
Canon for sure. I know what I'm getting for Christmas!
timewarpedstudios 3 years ago
Canon is better. I'm probably gonna buy this one
LAGuy800 3 years ago
Canon won
gianteagle15221 3 years ago
It's hard to judge on Youtube but it looks like the Canon had more depth and colour. Anyone else agree?
cant7think7clearly 3 years ago
Yes, I noticed the color difference too. I much prefer the Canon's color interpretation. It seems truer and brighter.
CrowTHuman 3 years ago
How difficult would you say it is to take videos shot on the Canon Vixia and convert them for upload/playback on YouTube or the average computer? I've heard that the hi-def files are very intense to download, edit, and convert. Is it easy to burn DVDs as well?
northwestmike 3 years ago
Sony has loss of color, more gray than colorful if you ask me... and Vixia is cheaper
MrPacMan36 3 years ago
They both look so crappy on YouTube, I find it amusing that anybody would even try to draw any conclusions from watching this (here, anyway). It would be better to glue the vids side-by-side and then put them on some higher-fidelity site like Vimeo.
jaholmes01 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
destructionfun 3 years ago
Comment removed
destructionfun 3 years ago
actually you will be disappointed if you try to shot some action like a formula 1 race or being in a car that doing more that 140 mph,i liked this cam and loved the resolution but when i try to record my speedo dials in one of my cars after i pass the 140 mph i get this blue screen and this message about over buffer thing then stops recording,so i don't know if this happens with the canon or not,enjoy and good luck.
paradise1man 3 years ago
That could be the vibration though. At 140 u gotta b shakin like a black chicks ass. lol.
jonnytann09 3 years ago
ha ha hah,loved that part of the message anyway,the cam was fixed in a interior cam mount so it does not shake at all,and when i said a formula 1 i mean when you are watching the race from a distance as soon as you record it will give you the same blue screen also if you're with a band that plays music very high you will still get the same thing!!
paradise1man 3 years ago
what about smile detection been able to take still photos as your record video. Isnt that cool?
Also i think sony has viewfinder?
gt3csl 3 years ago
this is one of the ore useful video reviews.. good test. Can see the Canon is better.. motion and colour.
Jay1967 3 years ago
I think Canon Vixia is looks better = )
holahellosalut 3 years ago
From your site:"How many times would you have shot in HD then wished you shot in SD?" If I wish to record a conference i would definitely do it on SD ;D
kafka27 3 years ago
Canon Vixia looks much better on the motion tests and has a little bit brighter colors than the sony.
PWNZORDIZED 3 years ago 3
IMO the motion test looks smoother on Sony. By the way, what should I look at if I want a cam to record smoother? Is it the bitrate or what?
kafka27 3 years ago
sony has a little bit better colours if you aske me...
betonman9 3 years ago