A musical selection is neither good or bad, unless people believe it to be so. I'm a modern theorist and am willing and able to admit: "We are often arrogant and ignorant, in our belief that we will construct wholesome guidelines from analyzing!" (e.g. I've got no clue whatsoever, even after almost two decades of training, what Bach or Mozart or Beethoven were thinking and feeling, but I do know this: "They broke our quote unquote rules more often than the average student is lead to believe!")
This piece just goes to show how much more interesting music can be when we stop listening to "theorists" telling us how to write "good" music. I like the tremelo(?) in the background that sounds like it's been electronically processed, or something. Anyone know where to find the recording?
geez lossen up. Listern to some modern stuff ............................stravinsky, hey maybe even check out some zappa. LOL seriously stop acting like you have sticks shoved up your anuses
geez lossen up. Listern to some modern stuff ............................stravinsky, hey maybe even check out some zappa. LOL seriously stop acting like you have sticks shoved up you anuses
I know Bach probably didn't write toccata and fugue in d minor but I was just trying to use one example they would have heard of. Contrapunctus XIV would probably be one of the greatest refutations to somebody saying that Bach is bland and standard but it won't help as much if they hadn't heard of it
It's bad counterpoint, not because it's dissonant (you can break that rule if you know how), but because you can't properly hear two equal voices- just one and some weird harmonies. In other words, it sounds fine, but without two clearly defined musical lines, it is not counterpoint.
But this is designed to show an example of poor counterpoint, and as such, it works.
@DonnieTheKing That definition won't work because "simultaneous occurence of the 2 or more voices" could be accomplished by having all the voices move in parallel motion, which is precisely what counterpoint avoids. Counterpoint requires independence of the voices, accomplished by favoring contrary, similar and oblique motion over parallel motion.
I wish more examples such as this would presented alongside with something to compare it to. Comparison is such a strong way to make the qualities of something become clear. This sounds like music to me, even if I knew where the "errors" are I don't think they would bug me that much, but maybe if I had the chance to compare it with an alternate version with "correct" counterpoint, Maybe then I would learn something or discover a new way of hearing things.
Bach broke many of those rules. He was just the best, not the most rule-abiding. Possibly he would say it is bad on the basis of it's unimaginative repetition of notes. The only thing really making this cool is the effect.
well, you could be right about bach braking the rules some rules but as far as ive learned and studied his works, he never broke any basic harmony rules
How basic do you mean by harmony rules? For an extremely common example, Toccata and Fugue involves many parallel harmonies and ends with a IV I without a picardy third. But for actual dissonant things, listen to fantasy in G minor. There is also chromatic fantasy and fugue in d minor, and the 'wedge' fugue in e minor. They have pretty unconventional harmonies.
damn - I hit the "disagree" hand instead of the "agree" one. and youtube doesn't appear to let you correct your mistakes.
Yes. I agree. Music is not set in stone, and should not be. If you couldn't break the rules, then there would be no freedom to it.
besides - I think when Fux was writing his rules, he was probably thinking a lot along the lines of "uh-oh - that doesn't sound right in most cases. ok - let's make it illegal"
It is true, and in fact happens more often than not in modern music, that the rules of counterpoint are not obeyed. However, one can still use theses rules without breaking them to create truly beautiful music.
@SpawnofHastur I guess that's cool in a poetic way, but realistically that doesn't make much sense. Musical rules are there so music can evolve and not sound like garbage.
Oh, certainly. But for quite a long time, people thought that the major third was a dissonant interval- and yet, today, we use it freely as a consonant one.
Some of the most beautiful pieces I've ever head wag their middle fingers at the rules of theory- Henry Cowell's Irish Suite, or Leo Ornstein, for example.
I'll admit, quite a lot of folk wouldn't like it, but I love it.
@SpawnofHastur Whether an interval is treated as consonant or dissonant has nothing to do with whether someone thinks it sounds beautiful; it has to do with the aesthetics of tension and resolution.
In Western music, the 3rd has been treated as an imperfect consonance, never as a dissonance. (The perfect consonances are the unison, 5th and 8ve.)
@DrShankums The rules were derived from observation of what composers did when writing in a a certain style. The purpose of following the rules is to imitate that style. If you expect to hear something in that style but the composer departs significantly from the rules, you tend to hear the departure as "something's not quite right" because is doesn't fit the style.
It has nothing to do with right or wrong, good or bad. It has to do with sounding true to a particular style.
There are rules to counterpoint that are being broken throughout the piece, it was simply written to show the student and composer examples of a bad counterpoint.
Counterpoint relies on heavy use of independence of each voice, and there are many problems here. The rhythm of each note is the same for each voice, not to mention three are many perfect intervals (which tend to sound like a bland mix of voices instead of a flavor of separate voices).
Not to say this is bad music. Poor demonstration of counterpoint, but interesting sound otherwise.
@C33Four "Counterpoint", by which you mean the practice of counterpoint as opposed to an instance of a counterpoint, does not merely rely on heavy use of on independence of the parts.
Counterpoint IS, BY DEFINITION, independence of the parts, accomplished by the use of contrary, similar and oblique motion and avoidance of parallel motion.
The parts do not have different note values avoid parallel motion.
In the 1st species of modal counterpoint, all the parts move in whole notes.
@C33Four I would have to agree with you-- I find it actually a quite interesting piece of music, if a bit abstract, but pleasant and enjoyable. Not however, contrapuntal at all, but "planar," as in the music of the Impressionists.
@C33Four The first species of counterpoint is "note against note" which all voice have the same rhythm. This composition doesn't follow the rest of the criteria for "note against note" so it is not counterpoint.
@C33Four Those are barely problems with counterpoint, if you are going to say something, parallel fifths and octaves, problems with the leading tone, consecutive direct fifths by contrary motion, ect, would be the biggest sorts of problems.
A musical selection is neither good or bad, unless people believe it to be so. I'm a modern theorist and am willing and able to admit: "We are often arrogant and ignorant, in our belief that we will construct wholesome guidelines from analyzing!" (e.g. I've got no clue whatsoever, even after almost two decades of training, what Bach or Mozart or Beethoven were thinking and feeling, but I do know this: "They broke our quote unquote rules more often than the average student is lead to believe!")
gblaney 1 month ago
This piece just goes to show how much more interesting music can be when we stop listening to "theorists" telling us how to write "good" music. I like the tremelo(?) in the background that sounds like it's been electronically processed, or something. Anyone know where to find the recording?
palomaeyes 2 months ago
this is really cool. Really really cool.
broodfood 2 months ago
That actually sounds kinda cool, like in an eerie way...should be in a film.
N891US 2 months ago
Is this about counterpoint?
gr4l9um20b7o 2 months ago
when your ears tell you it's right, it's right..
datisookzo 4 months ago
this more of harmany than counterpoint. And i here too many dissanant intervals.
mroldschoolhiphop1 4 months ago
Ey! check out my upload, "Counterpoint - Mafia Wars" It's a kool example ;)
DICACIO1 6 months ago
Comment removed
DICACIO1 6 months ago
Really bad counterpoint, really bad music. Maybe good if you're smoking something mellow . . . otherwise, just more new age garbage in C major.
callmeBe 7 months ago
Oh shit no -- I thought I burned that homework . . .
manthasagittarius 7 months ago 6
@manthasagittarius LOL... that was extremely clever and funny
DICACIO1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
geez lossen up. Listern to some modern stuff ............................stravinsky, hey maybe even check out some zappa. LOL seriously stop acting like you have sticks shoved up your anuses
brunostung 8 months ago
geez lossen up. Listern to some modern stuff ............................stravinsky, hey maybe even check out some zappa. LOL seriously stop acting like you have sticks shoved up you anuses
brunostung 8 months ago
This is pretty much what new age all about
CroissantOrange 9 months ago
cute!
BeauJames59 10 months ago
Sounds like my first first species attempt.... no, mine was better.
MatsEP 11 months ago
bad counterpoint, nice ambient music.
Nillz1990 1 year ago 8
The problem here is that i don't see a shit of the score.
Laudan08 1 year ago 8
there is just no counterpoint... we call it an homorythm
poupoule22 1 year ago
Since when is it a truism that Bach didn't compose the T&F in Dm, his most well-known piece!?
mahajohn 1 year ago
I know Bach probably didn't write toccata and fugue in d minor but I was just trying to use one example they would have heard of. Contrapunctus XIV would probably be one of the greatest refutations to somebody saying that Bach is bland and standard but it won't help as much if they hadn't heard of it
parquar 1 year ago
@parquar I don't know any such thing. Neither does anyone else. It was probably a transcription of a work for solo violin.
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
It's bad counterpoint, not because it's dissonant (you can break that rule if you know how), but because you can't properly hear two equal voices- just one and some weird harmonies. In other words, it sounds fine, but without two clearly defined musical lines, it is not counterpoint.
But this is designed to show an example of poor counterpoint, and as such, it works.
AEFic 1 year ago
John Cage would have been proud of you.
smalin 1 year ago 6
Whats the point of all these theory rules anyway?
And what is counterpoint?
fcmilsweeper9 1 year ago
@fcmilsweeper9 In its simplest terms, counterpoint is the simultaneous occurrance of two or more voices.
DonnieTheKing 1 year ago
@DonnieTheKing That definition won't work because "simultaneous occurence of the 2 or more voices" could be accomplished by having all the voices move in parallel motion, which is precisely what counterpoint avoids. Counterpoint requires independence of the voices, accomplished by favoring contrary, similar and oblique motion over parallel motion.
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
@wcbroccoli
DonnieTheKing 1 year ago
I wish more examples such as this would presented alongside with something to compare it to. Comparison is such a strong way to make the qualities of something become clear. This sounds like music to me, even if I knew where the "errors" are I don't think they would bug me that much, but maybe if I had the chance to compare it with an alternate version with "correct" counterpoint, Maybe then I would learn something or discover a new way of hearing things.
jdean9 1 year ago
this is not counterpoint
PrepsAndEmosSuck 1 year ago
this is beautiful. only bach would say this is bad but not everything has to abide by classical theory
allanm8888 2 years ago
Bach broke many of those rules. He was just the best, not the most rule-abiding. Possibly he would say it is bad on the basis of it's unimaginative repetition of notes. The only thing really making this cool is the effect.
parquar 1 year ago
well, you could be right about bach braking the rules some rules but as far as ive learned and studied his works, he never broke any basic harmony rules
allanm8888 1 year ago
How basic do you mean by harmony rules? For an extremely common example, Toccata and Fugue involves many parallel harmonies and ends with a IV I without a picardy third. But for actual dissonant things, listen to fantasy in G minor. There is also chromatic fantasy and fugue in d minor, and the 'wedge' fugue in e minor. They have pretty unconventional harmonies.
parquar 1 year ago
ok i stand corrected
allanm8888 1 year ago
@parquar Bach didn't write the Toccata and Fugue, btw. In fact, those very qualities are evidence of its dubious authorship.
bmh4d0k3n 1 year ago
Reminds me of Erik Satie.........
Marmalade000000 2 years ago
I really like it. I would use some of those chords while composing minimalism.
amistrymister 2 years ago
shite counterpoint, fantastic piece
ragerpez 2 years ago 3
The rules are there so you think before you break them, not so you don't break them at all.
I like this piece.
If you don't bend the rules, then music as a whole doesn't evolve.
SpawnofHastur 2 years ago 4
damn - I hit the "disagree" hand instead of the "agree" one. and youtube doesn't appear to let you correct your mistakes.
Yes. I agree. Music is not set in stone, and should not be. If you couldn't break the rules, then there would be no freedom to it.
besides - I think when Fux was writing his rules, he was probably thinking a lot along the lines of "uh-oh - that doesn't sound right in most cases. ok - let's make it illegal"
kaeverens 2 years ago
It is true, and in fact happens more often than not in modern music, that the rules of counterpoint are not obeyed. However, one can still use theses rules without breaking them to create truly beautiful music.
PhrygianBlack 2 years ago
@SpawnofHastur I guess that's cool in a poetic way, but realistically that doesn't make much sense. Musical rules are there so music can evolve and not sound like garbage.
DrShankums 1 year ago 14
@DrShankums
Oh, certainly. But for quite a long time, people thought that the major third was a dissonant interval- and yet, today, we use it freely as a consonant one.
Some of the most beautiful pieces I've ever head wag their middle fingers at the rules of theory- Henry Cowell's Irish Suite, or Leo Ornstein, for example.
I'll admit, quite a lot of folk wouldn't like it, but I love it.
SpawnofHastur 1 year ago
@SpawnofHastur Whether an interval is treated as consonant or dissonant has nothing to do with whether someone thinks it sounds beautiful; it has to do with the aesthetics of tension and resolution.
In Western music, the 3rd has been treated as an imperfect consonance, never as a dissonance. (The perfect consonances are the unison, 5th and 8ve.)
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
@DrShankums The purpose of these rules is to know which you can break and for what reasons.
smitty01209 1 year ago
@smitty01209 No, the purpose of the rules are for a better understanding of how music works.
DrShankums 1 year ago
@DrShankums The rules were derived from observation of what composers did when writing in a a certain style. The purpose of following the rules is to imitate that style. If you expect to hear something in that style but the composer departs significantly from the rules, you tend to hear the departure as "something's not quite right" because is doesn't fit the style.
It has nothing to do with right or wrong, good or bad. It has to do with sounding true to a particular style.
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
This is actually quite awesome. Very original sound.
ReignOfPraine 2 years ago
What is wrong with the counterpoint?
finchisgod 2 years ago
There are rules to counterpoint that are being broken throughout the piece, it was simply written to show the student and composer examples of a bad counterpoint.
MaventaofCosta 2 years ago
excuse my ignorance...why is this bad counter point?
charliethewookie 2 years ago
Counterpoint relies on heavy use of independence of each voice, and there are many problems here. The rhythm of each note is the same for each voice, not to mention three are many perfect intervals (which tend to sound like a bland mix of voices instead of a flavor of separate voices).
Not to say this is bad music. Poor demonstration of counterpoint, but interesting sound otherwise.
C33Four 2 years ago 15
Comment removed
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
@C33Four "Counterpoint", by which you mean the practice of counterpoint as opposed to an instance of a counterpoint, does not merely rely on heavy use of on independence of the parts.
Counterpoint IS, BY DEFINITION, independence of the parts, accomplished by the use of contrary, similar and oblique motion and avoidance of parallel motion.
The parts do not have different note values avoid parallel motion.
In the 1st species of modal counterpoint, all the parts move in whole notes.
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
@wcbroccoli Thanks, you just saved me from having to trawl through the internet looking for a definition of counterpoint for my my music homework.
WorldThatWeLiveIn 1 year ago
@C33Four I would have to agree with you-- I find it actually a quite interesting piece of music, if a bit abstract, but pleasant and enjoyable. Not however, contrapuntal at all, but "planar," as in the music of the Impressionists.
monteverdi1567 6 months ago
@C33Four
try reading the description
broodfood 2 months ago
@broodfood thank for clarifying that, i dont think c33four understood that:)
joshu9174 2 months ago
@C33Four The first species of counterpoint is "note against note" which all voice have the same rhythm. This composition doesn't follow the rest of the criteria for "note against note" so it is not counterpoint.
toogoodbw 1 month ago
@C33Four thats why the video is called bad counterpoint
binky69 2 weeks ago
@C33Four Those are barely problems with counterpoint, if you are going to say something, parallel fifths and octaves, problems with the leading tone, consecutive direct fifths by contrary motion, ect, would be the biggest sorts of problems.
ixsetf 2 weeks ago
too close,
VolkColopatrion 2 years ago
How displeasing to my ears, lol.
oregonskateok 3 years ago 2