Also, the main focus of this performance and the transciption is not because the piece takes more than one player to succefully render an interpretation, but to more clearly display some of the polyphonic textures that are often lost when played by one violinist. Did you indeed know that this fugue was originally for organ?
Also, the main focus of this performance and the transciption is not because the piece takes more than one player to succefully render an interpretation, but to more clearly display some of the polyphonic textures that are often lost when played by one violinist. Did you indeed know that this fugue was originally for organ?
Wow, somebody's vicious. We all know that people make mistakes in live performances. That part, along with many other, of the spontineity is what displaces the live above recorded performances.
And a word about phrasing: I personally don't agree with some of the phrasings and tempi in this specific performance, however I don't think anyone is to judge whether or not a particular interpretation is good or bad. It's all subjective.
Wow, this gave me goosebumps. And that male violinist is hot! Did you guys make this arrangement yourselves, or is it available somewhere?
brentusfirmus 3 months ago
LMFAO....lol 3 ppl playing sonata no.1 hahahahhaha....well...good job still...
chaos4124 4 years ago
Loved it! Thanks!
DaveGrossmanSoloBass 4 years ago
Wow... you're an ass, who embodies the admonition, "a little knowledge is dangerous thing." You think you're a music expert, but you're full of shit.
If you're conducting a jr. high orchestra, I hope you haven't driven people to suicide with your nastiness - because your opinions are worthless.
bitterfly77 4 years ago
interesting arrangement, good idea to try it
xujam 4 years ago
Lovely!!!!!!
zorinlove 4 years ago
Also, the main focus of this performance and the transciption is not because the piece takes more than one player to succefully render an interpretation, but to more clearly display some of the polyphonic textures that are often lost when played by one violinist. Did you indeed know that this fugue was originally for organ?
danielslee 5 years ago
Also, the main focus of this performance and the transciption is not because the piece takes more than one player to succefully render an interpretation, but to more clearly display some of the polyphonic textures that are often lost when played by one violinist. Did you indeed know that this fugue was originally for organ?
danielslee 5 years ago
Wow, somebody's vicious. We all know that people make mistakes in live performances. That part, along with many other, of the spontineity is what displaces the live above recorded performances.
danielslee 5 years ago
And a word about phrasing: I personally don't agree with some of the phrasings and tempi in this specific performance, however I don't think anyone is to judge whether or not a particular interpretation is good or bad. It's all subjective.
danielslee 5 years ago
bravo
DanielLee326 5 years ago
It's actually Bravi.
otnpabka 5 years ago
then why do ppl say bravo
DanielLee326 5 years ago