The caller basically assumed that evolution has a direction and that all simians will eventually turn into humans. He also seemed to assume there were only two possible explanations and if evolution was wrong then creation was right. And his whole proof was that evolution is wrong. Is that about right?
"There's presences and there's nighttime, and presents are delivered at night by Santa, and, coinincidently, they were only there this morning and not yesterday evening. So Santa exists."
"But your parents--"
"SANTA WAS BORN BEFORE THEM AND THEY TELL ME HE'S TRUE!"
Thanks fundamentalists. Your blantant realm of pseudo-reasoning is simply fascinationg.
He might impress his brainwashed brethren with his evasive nonsense but it only exposed him as not having any interested in truth. He claims science is wrong then attempts to cherry pick science. Science doesn't need a god to "prove" anything. Creationists seem to be incapable of honesty and when they are clearly wrong are dismissive to the point of irrationality. Choosing ignorance to defend their egos from total annihilation.
@charleswolfman The whole thing is that creationist cannot do that. As they have to equate all of those things in one little neat box. So that they can hope to confuse the uniformed.
wow, he is just jumpin' back and forth and tapdancing around it, just like matt said^^
id love to see someone on this show who can actually present his arguments in a coherent and logical way. the hosts would still prove him/her wrong but at least i wouldnt get a headache from trying to follow the argument!^^
I often wonder if sex with religious fundamentalists is like this as well... a huge introductory line followed by a bit of unproductive, unpleasurable dancing around, followed by a whimpering retreat.
@Gaybykersonacid They found a wooden structure that was never proven to be an actual "boat". 99.9% is not a realistic assertion of proof positive. The "ark" has been found numerous times throughout history and not once has it ever been proven to exist. This discovering has been shelved and I'm sure a new ark discovery will be on the next horizon.
@Gaybykersonacid Stealing a screen name from a Leicester based band of noise from the 1980`s?....unless you are Mary Mary or someone, if so....Hi there.
I can see how people could find this funny. Yes, the guy is an idiot, but I don't think I can ever laugh at these kind of people.
Actually I get more depressed. Every time I see such an idiot I see another person who needs to somehow be taught the facts of reality.
We have a responsibility for these people. We can't let them live in their own stupidity or someone might get hurt or even killed. Be that the theist himself/herself or some target of his/her "righteus" hatred (homosexuals)
"theres people and theres monkeys and they are completely different" - moron christian caller
Um.. how is a chimpanzee completely different from us when they are genetically 98% identical to us?? Thats whet the caller considers 'completely different'?
Lets apply logic to the concept of heaven. Heaven is eternal, its existed since the beginning of the universe, (allegedly) but there were no humans until 300,000 year ago, that means heaven was completely empty for 3.7 billion years? Just god sitting there by himself waiting for humans to evolve so that when they die he could start filling his 'heaven' up with them? This makes ZERO sense.
Do you ever get the feeling that the whole world is trolling you with this religion thing? I don't understand how people can rationalize like this guy does...
@MrKlem86 I only believed in Santa Clause until I was around 5 or 6 years old. Critical thinking and skepticism are functions that develop as you grow and understand the nature of society. Ironically I stopped believing in Santa after watching a Christmas cartoon. The protagonists in the cartoon had their "faith" in Santa challenged by an older bully type character. They overcame their doubts about Santa and were rewarded with presents and a personal interview with Santa. I called bullshit...
@WiseMosquito Well... that's how I feel about faith, the bible and jesus... A nice story ,a nice idea, but I call it bullshit... No offense to believer though...
Are you able to have the same skepticism toward what you believe in than the one you had in Sant Claus. If not ? how is this possible?
@MrKlem86 I don't understand what you are asking me (you do know I'm an atheist right?). I try my best to be critical of ALL claims, and I use logic and reasoning to determine what is real. Your question of whether or not I can be skeptical of my beliefs doesn't make sense to me. I can only assume that you think I am a theist (How you would figure that, is also confusing to me). If I'm wrong, can you please re-phrase the question for me?
@MrKlem86 You know, I hate stepping on others' conversations but...
I feel like the Santa Claus comparison is unfair. When you equate a concept as eclectic as faith to a specific explicitly fictional story, I think it cheapens our position. It's very easy to say "but Santa Claus is not supposed to be real. Our parents let us in on the secret at some point. SC's existence also a recent cultural ritual and not an esoteric belief in something that is inherently unprovable."
@MrKlem86 While I understand what you're trying to say, it's a flawed analogy. Vampires would be entirely apt, however, because the belief in vampires was held as true at one time and is unprovable by any means currently available to us. Theists by and large will not listen to reason. At all. But if a young person is reading this and can easily deconstruct our logic they can just retreat into illogic because they can delude themselves into thinking that's all we've got.
@Bradkey98765 My statement is, just, universally accepted among the qualified. This is not a strange concept, nor is it cringe worthy (blows my mind) or nonsensical.
I'd brush up on those theories too, all of the ones you've listed are fringe and all but abandoned. Hell, there are hundreds of journal articles and books that track the universe back to the first moments of the big bang. By moments I mean less than the first trillionth of a trillionth of a second. We can't go earlier because ...
@DirtyEdon I'm not quite sure what you're saying because your sentences are so mixed up, but I do have the very easy and accurate answer to your question. The laws of physics in this universe came about in the instances of the big bang; before the big bang the laws were different.
@cemarz I am an atheist, but what you said made me cringe a little ("before the big bang the laws were different."). There are many view points, some would say “before the big bang” is nonsensical as it means before time. Alternatively the end of one universe may bring the next (This was built upon the assumption black hole evaporation causes information to be lost, making this theory not violate any laws of thermodynamics). Another view point is eternal inflationn.
@cemarz And then another view point is time should be viewed more like space, where the existence of boundaries is a non-issue.
This is just a small handful of “Before the big bang” theories, most of them create predictions to help support/disprove them. But for now no one can say for certain what happened before the big bang, of if there was even such a time.
so he just said he thinks that is the best explanation which becomes more of a belief because it is not based on fact but an explanation how it occured.
so what there are telling me that if the big bang represented numbers it was be one because it is the reaction of the something unknown,science is trying to tell us that you can get to one without the number 0.if you know the laws of reaction that is impossible.It is impossible to get to 1 which represent the big bang without having zero,its like saying you got a text from someone before there even text you is is impossbile.yes there big bang happened but what caused it ?
Oh, I laughed my ass off to this one! I'm starting to believe that all christians are just trolls. They have to be, it's the most reasonable explanation.
these guys you talk to on this show hurt my head. i love you guys but its all the same. its not your guys fault. its the christians fault. you guys never get a good argument. i feel like you guys are arguing with a talking brain tumor with retardism. i feel bad for you guys but really. keep this up. makes me smile and laugh. great show. but i do feel bad for you guys. hope find someone can keep up.... caugh cant happen caugh. oh my. sorry
Tracy was so funny!! She just kept on trying to hear that idiot out. I think Matt was actually in pain listening to this crap though, lol. Just an FYI to creationists.... They may call it 'creation science' but that doesn't make it actual science. A turd by any other name, is still a turd. If you want to learn about science, talk to a scientist. If you want to learn about mythology, talk to a priest.
@RenegadeOfSociety Sun goes up, sun goes down. Never a mis communication between the Zuru fairies that drag it around the earth. They are so efficient!
@RenegadeOfSociety you should see the bill o reilly getting owned by stephen colbert. My favorite part is when they're arguing stephen says he hates people who criticize you o reilly, because they always criticize what you say and never how loud or how long you say it XD
the majority of civilization is to stupid to understand what took Super intelligent minds many years to explain. Thats why doorknobs like Kirk cameran troll around arguing the banana theory, and as someone mentioned earlier, the pin head bill OReilly bringing up tides, TIDES!! So creationists have bananas, tides, talking snakes and Sara palin, we have Richard dawkins, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and the majority of the scientific society
@berenjervin Yup, im a transitional form between my parents and my children (if I had any).
Generally though a transitional form is considered to be a creature that exhibits characteristics of two different taxanomic groups. However what we consider to be taxanomic groups is entirely arbritary and nearly useless in describing the continuum of evolutionary change.
>Yup, im a transitional form between my parents and my children (if I had any).
HAH! Its these types of comments that make these forums interesting. I've never thought of "transitional forms" that way. But its certainly true isnt it?
I pretty much agree with everything else you just said to. In view of your above comment, I think we can see examples of transitional forms today in living creatures.
Take dogs for example - can a male St Bernard mate with a female poodle?
This is an example of a species splitting into multiple species.
Or Ligers (Male lion, female tiger) and tigons (male tiger, female lion). These are different species, but can be mated to produce offspring. These can be viewed as possible transitional forms (or would be, if they were common in nature)
I firmly believe that Christians feel they need to believe in a 'God' because they would have no idea how to live their life and/or feel they have no purpose in life without a 'God', no sense of direction.
So by Christian standards if I kill a man, get life in prison but ask for forgiveness I will be forgiven like that? It's quite illogical, but hey if it helps the weak-willed get through their day, then continue to believe whatever it is you believe.
People say that there is missing links. Well there is new fossils discovered every year! They refuse to research evolution properly because if they did they wouldnt look so stupid while making silly comments on it. Type in new fossils found in google to open your eyes a little more creationist fiends!!!
I'm afraid faith versus 'reason' doesn't work. The reason the age old argument will never end is because the arguments don't clash at all, in that they aren't on the same level, and so one can't and won't disprove the other. Atheism is a linear approach to life, to put it bluntly, and religion is a non-linear approach. That's just how I view it. Although there are compelling arguments for both, everyone involved in this video is a dumb ass.
@cbilljones I don't want to start an internet argument, because no one will be any better off. What I meant was religion doesn't base its self on facts and whatnot, just faith, and by typing 'non-linear approach' I really meant the opposite to what atheists go by. I don't want to convert you to any faith, just make people understand that this argument will never be settled until the world ends.
Waste of my fucking time. If he started with that shit they could hang up 10 seconds later. Why was I even expecting something reasonable in the first place?
I'm pretty sure this guy was high.... he's all over the place with his "proof". Wow! Do not call someone that does his research... smoke a joint... then display your ignorance to the world!
@JMUDoc He probably thinks that since alligators and sharks lived with dinosaurs, they were dinosaurs, and because there still alive, we are walking the Earth with dinosaurs. I love creationists. lol
@johnnybloom100 What scenario that most SOUNDS correct is IRRELEVANT. Intuiton, even logic can be fooled. What REALLY matters is what explanation if any is supported by empirical evidence. And if no hypotheses or explanation has any supporting evidence, then the sane, rational, and honest answer is "I don't currently know". And I will keep looking for answers that ARE supported by evidence. To the best of my ability, I will follow the evidence wherever it leads.
@johnnybloom100 You are very welcome :) Btw, if you are afraid of hell and you want to lose that fear, then I reccomend that you google EMDR. EMDR is a form of cognitive behavioral therapy used to treat fear, anxiety, and PTSD. There are some great emdr youtube videos - I like to listen to the atheist experience while watching a youtube EMDR video. Basically, EMDR helps the right and left sides of your brain integrate. If you want to know more, send me a message, and I will help you for free.
@superfalcon123 LOL FEAR of hell that is the funniest thing i have ever heard, no i dont have any fear of hell but thanks anyway i will check that out for sure (emdr)
@johnnybloom100 If we don't know, who was Jack the Ripper, is the thesis sound, that JtR was God? Actually not. Even since it is possible, that Jack the Ripper was God, there is no proof for it! And even since it is possible, that God created us, there is no proof for it.
@johnnybloom100 What if the theory of gravity is false? Or the theory of flight? Do you feel it necessary to have fantastical backups for those, too? We have - quite literally - millions of tons of evidence for evolution and none whatsoever for creation. Why would we want creation in our collective back pocket "just in case"? If evolution is wrong, then something created all that fossil, stratigraphic, and DNA evidence to look EXACTLY as if it is correct. I've never read THAT in the Bible.
@carmium wow man relax i am an atheist, i am not arguing for creationism or for the bible or for having fantastic backups i know we have tons of evidence for evolution all i was asking was that wouldn't creation be a reasonable hypothesis if we didn't already have evolution, my question was not a challenge.
its 2011 and we are still having this discussion??
when are people going to fucking realize that religion is not a good thing or a good way to live your life? and damn what is it going to take for people to learn?
how many more people have to die before the murderous truth is uncovered?
they ban music because "its satanist" they ban gay marriage because "its not gods will" they ban abortion because "every life is valuable"
i am sick of it its fucking depressing as hell fuck
What is the real difference between gay and straight people? What can a heterosexual couple do that a homosexual couple can't do? The foundation of this debate is religion, and why no religion really gives humanity its morality.
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate than the word "gay".
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with complete support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
Bill you have no understanding of anything.There are people and there are monkeys, that proves creation...Bill who were the ancestors of the monkeys and people? Why do they both share the same 99.5%DNA?
Tracie gets so excited when someone is about to say something stupid lol.
MCSKeelar 19 hours ago
Wow... Clearly we are apes because some people haven't evolved yet to have actual INTELLIGENCE!
ZombineVelancious 1 day ago in playlist Favorite videos
Comment removed
Cerulean0987 3 days ago
Wow...Just wow...
Zentz29 3 days ago
Brilliant fun.
MrRationalgaze 3 days ago
Just shoot this dude.
DUMPOFTHEWEEK 4 days ago
Heavens, this is the dumbest one yet...
kadene2 5 days ago
I'm going to create man and woman with original sin.
Then I'm going to impregnate a woman with myself as her child,
so that I can be born. Once alive,
I will kill myself as a sacrifice to myself.
To save you from the sin I originally condemned you to.
- God
monkeypeopleofearth 5 days ago 4
The caller basically assumed that evolution has a direction and that all simians will eventually turn into humans. He also seemed to assume there were only two possible explanations and if evolution was wrong then creation was right. And his whole proof was that evolution is wrong. Is that about right?
jaygee514 5 days ago
Woooow this guy is completely confused and wrong!
InfinityDz 1 week ago
"There's proof in Santa"
"How so?"
"There's presences and there's nighttime, and presents are delivered at night by Santa, and, coinincidently, they were only there this morning and not yesterday evening. So Santa exists."
"But your parents--"
"SANTA WAS BORN BEFORE THEM AND THEY TELL ME HE'S TRUE!"
Thanks fundamentalists. Your blantant realm of pseudo-reasoning is simply fascinationg.
TheOkami1113 1 week ago
This is like trying to have a serious conversation with a very earnest and very dumb child.
OneWarmDragon 1 week ago
...Nevermind.
Revolutionave 1 week ago
Can someone please tell me what band is playing in the video?
Revolutionave 1 week ago
He might impress his brainwashed brethren with his evasive nonsense but it only exposed him as not having any interested in truth. He claims science is wrong then attempts to cherry pick science. Science doesn't need a god to "prove" anything. Creationists seem to be incapable of honesty and when they are clearly wrong are dismissive to the point of irrationality. Choosing ignorance to defend their egos from total annihilation.
ThePositiveAussie 1 week ago
Like masturbating with a cheese grater, slightly amusing but mostly painful.
AussieAtheist1 1 week ago
People are monkeys....that proves it. Evolution is a fact.
kshackleton 1 week ago
@kshackleton Apes, actually. Humans are apes. No tail, you see.
boochainletters12 1 day ago
@boochainletters12
Apes are a sub-set of monkey. It is correct to also refer to humans as such....old-world monkeys to be precise.
kshackleton 1 day ago
God exists. there are zebras and horses.
Neshuah1 1 week ago
I don't understand it therefore GOD.
entewente 1 week ago
@entewente La la la, I can't hear you, therefore, god.
therealjammit 1 week ago
Evolution, abiogenesis, big bang....
PICK A FUCKING TOPIC AND STICK WITH IT!
This shit hurts my brain.
charleswolfman 1 week ago 3
@charleswolfman The whole thing is that creationist cannot do that. As they have to equate all of those things in one little neat box. So that they can hope to confuse the uniformed.
NathanWubs 6 days ago
"The Bible says it, so let's go from there". Proving something by starting with an assumption that everything already happened doesn't work, sorry.
solitaryman098 1 week ago 4
wow, he is just jumpin' back and forth and tapdancing around it, just like matt said^^
id love to see someone on this show who can actually present his arguments in a coherent and logical way. the hosts would still prove him/her wrong but at least i wouldnt get a headache from trying to follow the argument!^^
mApppel 2 weeks ago
:facedesk:
Soundz2598 2 weeks ago
This was just one BIG argument from Ignorance.
23Tev 2 weeks ago 4
I often wonder if sex with religious fundamentalists is like this as well... a huge introductory line followed by a bit of unproductive, unpleasurable dancing around, followed by a whimpering retreat.
Estragon17 2 weeks ago 30
@Estragon17 It is. It really is.
xJoeEDangerouslyx 1 week ago
@Estragon17 Oh no, they're freaks. All that sexual repression makes them really into kinky shit.
JamesHLanier 6 days ago
This first guy think he's sooo much smarter than he actually is.
CriminalQueer 2 weeks ago
Typical creationist fool.
SissingPyd 2 weeks ago
This guy is an idiot!
VinceVolta 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Gaybykersonacid They found a wooden structure that was never proven to be an actual "boat". 99.9% is not a realistic assertion of proof positive. The "ark" has been found numerous times throughout history and not once has it ever been proven to exist. This discovering has been shelved and I'm sure a new ark discovery will be on the next horizon.
jdale1 3 weeks ago
That was embarrassing.
xBeastSyndrome 4 weeks ago 3
They found Noah's Ark in Turkey that is 99.9 percent for certain
The gooks could not deny it's the real deal even though they worship
Other shit in China
Gaybykersonacid 4 weeks ago
@Gaybykersonacid Stealing a screen name from a Leicester based band of noise from the 1980`s?....unless you are Mary Mary or someone, if so....Hi there.
sheikhyaboooty 1 week ago
All that blather for "Why are there still apes"?
fdasherv 4 weeks ago
Are there really people out there that are this stupid?
ExMormon66 4 weeks ago
@aegisgfx more like 98.4% n*gga :D
1zacster 1 month ago
I keep thinking the guy speaking is Philip Seymour Hoffman.
YawnGod 1 month ago
there is soda and there is beer,
omfns i just proofed santa !
ShooterCinema 1 month ago 2
I love how Tracie humours him
bourbonated 1 month ago
This is what happens when people watch Pokemon before reading On the Origin of Species
mystarmach 1 month ago 3
@mystarmach HAHAHAHAHAHA i breathed dr pepper up my nose when i read your comment XD
SuLLyZorZ 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The God of the Jews? Is that different from the God of the Catholics? Just wondering....
markedwardindc 1 month ago
Comment removed
markedwardindc 1 month ago
Christians seem to mix up evolution and big bang quite often.
BottleConcreteBlond 1 month ago
I can see how people could find this funny. Yes, the guy is an idiot, but I don't think I can ever laugh at these kind of people.
Actually I get more depressed. Every time I see such an idiot I see another person who needs to somehow be taught the facts of reality.
We have a responsibility for these people. We can't let them live in their own stupidity or someone might get hurt or even killed. Be that the theist himself/herself or some target of his/her "righteus" hatred (homosexuals)
TheRaivaaja 1 month ago 2
"theres people and theres monkeys and they are completely different" - moron christian caller
Um.. how is a chimpanzee completely different from us when they are genetically 98% identical to us?? Thats whet the caller considers 'completely different'?
aegisgfx 1 month ago 3
Lets apply logic to the concept of heaven. Heaven is eternal, its existed since the beginning of the universe, (allegedly) but there were no humans until 300,000 year ago, that means heaven was completely empty for 3.7 billion years? Just god sitting there by himself waiting for humans to evolve so that when they die he could start filling his 'heaven' up with them? This makes ZERO sense.
aegisgfx 1 month ago 2
I have the biggest smile on my face ever now!
Nahojism 1 month ago
My proof of creationism is simply this: There are elephants and rats and they are totally different.
FrozenPetrolPie 1 month ago
This guy just keeps repeating his opinion when asked to justify it and has no understanding of what he is talking about.
MrNicMachiavelli 1 month ago 2
Our public education tax dollars hard at work. I want my money back!
twistedH3L1X 1 month ago 2
Comment removed
twistedH3L1X 1 month ago
wtf is he talking about? lmao
OwNeD05 1 month ago
Do you ever get the feeling that the whole world is trolling you with this religion thing? I don't understand how people can rationalize like this guy does...
WiseMosquito 1 month ago 51
@WiseMosquito yah like"You just got GOD-ROLLED"!!
Mutherzmilk 3 weeks ago
@WiseMosquito Why did you start rationalize the santa Claus myth then?
MrKlem86 1 week ago
@MrKlem86 I only believed in Santa Clause until I was around 5 or 6 years old. Critical thinking and skepticism are functions that develop as you grow and understand the nature of society. Ironically I stopped believing in Santa after watching a Christmas cartoon. The protagonists in the cartoon had their "faith" in Santa challenged by an older bully type character. They overcame their doubts about Santa and were rewarded with presents and a personal interview with Santa. I called bullshit...
WiseMosquito 1 week ago
@WiseMosquito Well... that's how I feel about faith, the bible and jesus... A nice story ,a nice idea, but I call it bullshit... No offense to believer though...
Are you able to have the same skepticism toward what you believe in than the one you had in Sant Claus. If not ? how is this possible?
MrKlem86 1 week ago
@MrKlem86 I don't understand what you are asking me (you do know I'm an atheist right?). I try my best to be critical of ALL claims, and I use logic and reasoning to determine what is real. Your question of whether or not I can be skeptical of my beliefs doesn't make sense to me. I can only assume that you think I am a theist (How you would figure that, is also confusing to me). If I'm wrong, can you please re-phrase the question for me?
WiseMosquito 1 week ago
@WiseMosquito I did assume you were a theist...thus my question is irrelevant...sorry about that
MrKlem86 1 week ago
@MrKlem86 Haha, no problem. Maybe i should have been more clear I guess.
WiseMosquito 1 week ago
@MrKlem86 You know, I hate stepping on others' conversations but...
I feel like the Santa Claus comparison is unfair. When you equate a concept as eclectic as faith to a specific explicitly fictional story, I think it cheapens our position. It's very easy to say "but Santa Claus is not supposed to be real. Our parents let us in on the secret at some point. SC's existence also a recent cultural ritual and not an esoteric belief in something that is inherently unprovable."
xJoeEDangerouslyx 1 week ago
@MrKlem86 While I understand what you're trying to say, it's a flawed analogy. Vampires would be entirely apt, however, because the belief in vampires was held as true at one time and is unprovable by any means currently available to us. Theists by and large will not listen to reason. At all. But if a young person is reading this and can easily deconstruct our logic they can just retreat into illogic because they can delude themselves into thinking that's all we've got.
xJoeEDangerouslyx 1 week ago
@Bradkey98765 My statement is, just, universally accepted among the qualified. This is not a strange concept, nor is it cringe worthy (blows my mind) or nonsensical.
I'd brush up on those theories too, all of the ones you've listed are fringe and all but abandoned. Hell, there are hundreds of journal articles and books that track the universe back to the first moments of the big bang. By moments I mean less than the first trillionth of a trillionth of a second. We can't go earlier because ...
cemarz 1 month ago
It's like guhhhhhhhh why doesn't a fork evolve into a spoon guhhhhhh
LogicalStatements1 1 month ago
@DirtyEdon I'm not quite sure what you're saying because your sentences are so mixed up, but I do have the very easy and accurate answer to your question. The laws of physics in this universe came about in the instances of the big bang; before the big bang the laws were different.
cemarz 1 month ago
@cemarz I am an atheist, but what you said made me cringe a little ("before the big bang the laws were different."). There are many view points, some would say “before the big bang” is nonsensical as it means before time. Alternatively the end of one universe may bring the next (This was built upon the assumption black hole evaporation causes information to be lost, making this theory not violate any laws of thermodynamics). Another view point is eternal inflationn.
bradkey98765 1 month ago
@cemarz And then another view point is time should be viewed more like space, where the existence of boundaries is a non-issue.
This is just a small handful of “Before the big bang” theories, most of them create predictions to help support/disprove them. But for now no one can say for certain what happened before the big bang, of if there was even such a time.
bradkey98765 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a fucking idiot.
chinopisces 1 month ago
Wow. Just wow.
FreeIconoclast 1 month ago
did anyone catch tracy say "even if we found a trademark stamp in the core of the earth!" hahah that shit was funny!
PimpMyParadigm 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so he just said he thinks that is the best explanation which becomes more of a belief because it is not based on fact but an explanation how it occured.
DirtyEdon 2 months ago
so what there are telling me that if the big bang represented numbers it was be one because it is the reaction of the something unknown,science is trying to tell us that you can get to one without the number 0.if you know the laws of reaction that is impossible.It is impossible to get to 1 which represent the big bang without having zero,its like saying you got a text from someone before there even text you is is impossbile.yes there big bang happened but what caused it ?
DirtyEdon 2 months ago
Wow, that's like saying the only reason people would believe in gravity is because they have loyalty to Isaac Newton's theory. Wonderful proof.
Inclousid 2 months ago
i wish there was more than one matt dillahunty lol
jhibbitt1 2 months ago
And some monkeys can talk on the phone and they think they are people!
trojanthedog 2 months ago
Comment removed
shade9592 2 months ago
Ahhh I laugh so much at these thank you.
Vidk1ng 2 months ago
This guy has totally convinced himself that he is right without even knowing what he's talking about. I'd laugh if this weren't so sad.
MortimerKahn 2 months ago in playlist my AE
What's funny is that the theists that call up really have no idea how dumb they sound and how weak their arguments are
Karlcaudwell 2 months ago
face palm
CapQuacer 2 months ago
Apparently morons don't understand:
When you are trying to prove your god you must
a) Prove that there is a designer
b) Give proof that points to YOUR god
QuestionRenee 2 months ago
Oh, I laughed my ass off to this one! I'm starting to believe that all christians are just trolls. They have to be, it's the most reasonable explanation.
ztarzcream 2 months ago 3
videos like this make be break out in a girly laugh until a think for a second that the caller was serious an then i feel sad.
420simpson 2 months ago
The only monkey here is the caller. And that's an insult to monkeys.
kalsolarUK 2 months ago 2
@kalsolarUK Good one
AHundredButterflies 2 months ago
these guys you talk to on this show hurt my head. i love you guys but its all the same. its not your guys fault. its the christians fault. you guys never get a good argument. i feel like you guys are arguing with a talking brain tumor with retardism. i feel bad for you guys but really. keep this up. makes me smile and laugh. great show. but i do feel bad for you guys. hope find someone can keep up.... caugh cant happen caugh. oh my. sorry
gojoewhite1234 2 months ago
anyone know what the fuck this guys is talking about? he jumps around so much i cant follow him
APRIME 2 months ago
Tracy was so funny!! She just kept on trying to hear that idiot out. I think Matt was actually in pain listening to this crap though, lol. Just an FYI to creationists.... They may call it 'creation science' but that doesn't make it actual science. A turd by any other name, is still a turd. If you want to learn about science, talk to a scientist. If you want to learn about mythology, talk to a priest.
skywize 2 months ago 10
This caller just showed that people are way more stupid then monkies.
1DarkMasK1 2 months ago
I wonder if Bill O'Reilly is ever gonna ring in?
"tide goes in tide goes out, explain that?"
RenegadeOfSociety 3 months ago 48
@RenegadeOfSociety Sun goes up, sun goes down. Never a mis communication between the Zuru fairies that drag it around the earth. They are so efficient!
circusmonkey10 2 months ago in playlist atheist to watch
@RenegadeOfSociety nice. that would be funny. Hmmmm The moon maybe. I must say I was a little disappointed in Richards rebuttal.
OOberization 2 months ago
@OOberization Usually Richard Dawkins is brutal on people but with O'Reilly he just sat back not finishing sentences, I to was disappointed.
RenegadeOfSociety 2 months ago
@RenegadeOfSociety Your comment seriously made me lol XD
boolengleng 1 month ago
@RenegadeOfSociety
it woud be like
hell o reilly here
hung up...
dont even bother
ShooterCinema 1 month ago
@RenegadeOfSociety Bread goes in, toast comes out. You can't explain that!
LOGICandREAS0N 1 month ago 3
@LOGICandREAS0N
scientist: well, the toaster burns the bread which.....
O'Reilly: SHUT UP! you can't explain that!
RenegadeOfSociety 1 month ago
@RenegadeOfSociety you should see the bill o reilly getting owned by stephen colbert. My favorite part is when they're arguing stephen says he hates people who criticize you o reilly, because they always criticize what you say and never how loud or how long you say it XD
SuLLyZorZ 4 weeks ago
@SuLLyZorZ Might have watched it but will probs check it out at some point, I want to see him get put in his place lol.
RenegadeOfSociety 4 weeks ago
the majority of civilization is to stupid to understand what took Super intelligent minds many years to explain. Thats why doorknobs like Kirk cameran troll around arguing the banana theory, and as someone mentioned earlier, the pin head bill OReilly bringing up tides, TIDES!! So creationists have bananas, tides, talking snakes and Sara palin, we have Richard dawkins, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and the majority of the scientific society
Mutherzmilk 3 weeks ago 4
If I were that guys father I would say: "Son, I am disappoint."
SilentKabob 3 months ago
over 9 minutes of talking for his whole argument being:
there'e people, there's monkeys...
.............
the world never finishes to surprise me with whole new levels of stupidity....
preragh 3 months ago
"Because the bible says, so we'll go from there"
Pathetic. Such people should be exterminated to prevent them from contaminating the rest of the human gene pool.
Orthrus 3 months ago 5
Stuttering, muttering clueless fuck.
smartarse001 3 months ago
Isnt every fossil every found a transitional form? (between one thing and another thing)
berenjervin 3 months ago
@berenjervin Yup, im a transitional form between my parents and my children (if I had any).
Generally though a transitional form is considered to be a creature that exhibits characteristics of two different taxanomic groups. However what we consider to be taxanomic groups is entirely arbritary and nearly useless in describing the continuum of evolutionary change.
094250001 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@094250001
>Yup, im a transitional form between my parents and my children (if I had any).
HAH! Its these types of comments that make these forums interesting. I've never thought of "transitional forms" that way. But its certainly true isnt it?
I pretty much agree with everything else you just said to. In view of your above comment, I think we can see examples of transitional forms today in living creatures.
berenjervin 3 months ago
@094250001
Take dogs for example - can a male St Bernard mate with a female poodle?
This is an example of a species splitting into multiple species.
Or Ligers (Male lion, female tiger) and tigons (male tiger, female lion). These are different species, but can be mated to produce offspring. These can be viewed as possible transitional forms (or would be, if they were common in nature)
berenjervin 3 months ago
Can't you guys import find intelligent Christians to talk to? Talking to bozos like this is just a waste of time.
It almost makes me wish at least one of you had never given up on Christianity, so that there'd be an intelligent Christian calling the show.
buybuydandavis 3 months ago
..sigh, that guy probly has power tools
kamilianawow 3 months ago
I firmly believe that Christians feel they need to believe in a 'God' because they would have no idea how to live their life and/or feel they have no purpose in life without a 'God', no sense of direction.
So by Christian standards if I kill a man, get life in prison but ask for forgiveness I will be forgiven like that? It's quite illogical, but hey if it helps the weak-willed get through their day, then continue to believe whatever it is you believe.
donkeylips88 3 months ago
They should have hung up after the mans first statement. It's obvious that he's high out of his mind.
MadjetReaper 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol... the caller can't separate the big bang from evolution, or evolution from atheism.
I guess when your answer to everything is exactly the same all the questions start to look alike.
Callirgos1 3 months ago
Comment removed
Callirgos1 3 months ago
People say that there is missing links. Well there is new fossils discovered every year! They refuse to research evolution properly because if they did they wouldnt look so stupid while making silly comments on it. Type in new fossils found in google to open your eyes a little more creationist fiends!!!
ATABOFACID 3 months ago
I'm afraid faith versus 'reason' doesn't work. The reason the age old argument will never end is because the arguments don't clash at all, in that they aren't on the same level, and so one can't and won't disprove the other. Atheism is a linear approach to life, to put it bluntly, and religion is a non-linear approach. That's just how I view it. Although there are compelling arguments for both, everyone involved in this video is a dumb ass.
johnjcb1 3 months ago
@johnjcb1 "religion is a non-linear approach" probablly the dumbest thing ive ever heard... my guess is you must be a troll, no one is that dumb.
cbilljones 3 months ago
@cbilljones
People are that dumb.
Callirgos1 3 months ago
@cbilljones I don't want to start an internet argument, because no one will be any better off. What I meant was religion doesn't base its self on facts and whatnot, just faith, and by typing 'non-linear approach' I really meant the opposite to what atheists go by. I don't want to convert you to any faith, just make people understand that this argument will never be settled until the world ends.
johnjcb1 3 months ago
This guy is talking out of his ass!
OpethIsTheBestBand 3 months ago
theres people and theres retards.. therefore creationism is false
Danovio 3 months ago
Did the caller say god of the juice?
zenmaher 3 months ago
@zenmaher Our Father, who art in Melon
TheBunbury42 3 months ago
@zenmaher Hahaa I noticed the same thing. juicus christ.
spolly18 3 months ago
This would be hillarious if it wasn't so embarassing. :P
antiHUMANDesigns 3 months ago 32
What an idiot caller.
tron81 3 months ago
Harris: Wait... nono wait, let him talk... hold on...
MrRazorz 3 months ago
AHAHAHA!!! This is so damn funny...I cant stop laughing! hahahahaha
Aguijon1982 3 months ago
theres people and theres monkeys hahahahahahahha
SpilkyWay 3 months ago
There's people and there's monkeys????!!!! That proves creationism????!!!What a dumbass.......
Adebayo714 3 months ago
There's people and there's mokeys.... ROFL!!!
mczeljk 3 months ago
Tracie is my favorite
gargantacortador 3 months ago 2
Waste of my fucking time. If he started with that shit they could hang up 10 seconds later. Why was I even expecting something reasonable in the first place?
ddrddrddrddr 4 months ago
I'm pretty sure this guy was high.... he's all over the place with his "proof". Wow! Do not call someone that does his research... smoke a joint... then display your ignorance to the world!
chicarbiomed 4 months ago
That caller. wow.
Wow.
people and monkeys.
Complete Idiot.
TheCycadsAreAudible 4 months ago
I love this song too. Just thought I'd say, they should play it more often.
zfan2591 4 months ago
Hey all you cocksucking! God fearing! Denying MFs
GO FUCK YOURSELVES!
icabodcranium 4 months ago
@zfan2591 Creationists and literalists do, yeah. On very shakey grounds, mind you. It's mostly used to "support" claims of a young earth.
ideologger 4 months ago
Do Christians still believe humans walked the Earth with dinosaurs?
zfan2591 4 months ago
@zfan2591
Kent Hovind does... indeed, he believes there are STILL dinosaurs...
JMUDoc 4 months ago
@JMUDoc He probably thinks that since alligators and sharks lived with dinosaurs, they were dinosaurs, and because there still alive, we are walking the Earth with dinosaurs. I love creationists. lol
zfan2591 4 months ago
can an atheist answer this question
if evolution is false then does'nt creationism sound like the most probable scenario what other theory could be possible
johnnybloom100 4 months ago
@johnnybloom100 What scenario that most SOUNDS correct is IRRELEVANT. Intuiton, even logic can be fooled. What REALLY matters is what explanation if any is supported by empirical evidence. And if no hypotheses or explanation has any supporting evidence, then the sane, rational, and honest answer is "I don't currently know". And I will keep looking for answers that ARE supported by evidence. To the best of my ability, I will follow the evidence wherever it leads.
superfalcon123 4 months ago
@superfalcon123 thanks a lot that was a very good answer
johnnybloom100 4 months ago
@johnnybloom100 You are very welcome :) Btw, if you are afraid of hell and you want to lose that fear, then I reccomend that you google EMDR. EMDR is a form of cognitive behavioral therapy used to treat fear, anxiety, and PTSD. There are some great emdr youtube videos - I like to listen to the atheist experience while watching a youtube EMDR video. Basically, EMDR helps the right and left sides of your brain integrate. If you want to know more, send me a message, and I will help you for free.
superfalcon123 3 months ago
@superfalcon123 LOL FEAR of hell that is the funniest thing i have ever heard, no i dont have any fear of hell but thanks anyway i will check that out for sure (emdr)
johnnybloom100 3 months ago
@johnnybloom100 If we don't know, who was Jack the Ripper, is the thesis sound, that JtR was God? Actually not. Even since it is possible, that Jack the Ripper was God, there is no proof for it! And even since it is possible, that God created us, there is no proof for it.
guillatra 4 months ago
@johnnybloom100 What if the theory of gravity is false? Or the theory of flight? Do you feel it necessary to have fantastical backups for those, too? We have - quite literally - millions of tons of evidence for evolution and none whatsoever for creation. Why would we want creation in our collective back pocket "just in case"? If evolution is wrong, then something created all that fossil, stratigraphic, and DNA evidence to look EXACTLY as if it is correct. I've never read THAT in the Bible.
carmium 4 months ago
@carmium wow man relax i am an atheist, i am not arguing for creationism or for the bible or for having fantastic backups i know we have tons of evidence for evolution all i was asking was that wouldn't creation be a reasonable hypothesis if we didn't already have evolution, my question was not a challenge.
johnnybloom100 4 months ago
:/
Daiseehead 4 months ago
This guy makes me think; men are clearly different from women. The idea that men are born out of women is just crazy!! :p
laprofessorapai 4 months ago
Tracie for the sake of argument agreed that he was right, thats cunning, cause the caller wasprobably not very used to being right.
matszz 4 months ago
Classic funny as hell the closing statement
wisebbq1 4 months ago
Matt, shut up and let Tracie handle it!
Tracie let's the caller hang himself. She knows exactly whats coming.
AakeTraak 4 months ago
its 2011 and we are still having this discussion??
when are people going to fucking realize that religion is not a good thing or a good way to live your life? and damn what is it going to take for people to learn?
how many more people have to die before the murderous truth is uncovered?
they ban music because "its satanist" they ban gay marriage because "its not gods will" they ban abortion because "every life is valuable"
i am sick of it its fucking depressing as hell fuck
MacMan5555 4 months ago
What is the real difference between gay and straight people? What can a heterosexual couple do that a homosexual couple can't do? The foundation of this debate is religion, and why no religion really gives humanity its morality.
zfan2591 4 months ago
Like this if you're SICK of the fucking "Why are there still monkeys?" argument!!!
outlaw87100 4 months ago 88
@outlaw87100 We have given answers to the people who want to know, Yet they keep asking!! FUCKING SICK OF IT!!!DUMB DELUSIONAL CUNTS!!
MarcusEFN 3 months ago
@outlaw87100 it's like saying, "if i exist, how can i still have a cousin???"
horbergus 2 months ago
@horbergus lol
outlaw87100 2 months ago
@outlaw87100 If Americans came form the British, why are there still British people ??? ;) I understand your point ...
xSnapper26x 2 months ago
THE BIBLE SAYS SO !!!!!! wow such ignorance ;)
xSnapper26x 2 months ago
There's people and there's monkeys, there different, the best argument he can come up with ;) LOL
xSnapper26x 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate than the word "gay".
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with complete support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
the proof is in the puddin' - eminem in his better days
LOGIC42369 4 months ago
typical brainfrozen xtian
wp4866 4 months ago
Bill you have no understanding of anything.There are people and there are monkeys, that proves creation...Bill who were the ancestors of the monkeys and people? Why do they both share the same 99.5%DNA?
timdnwd 4 months ago
I don't like the woman >_>
I don't like either of the two men also..actually. :/
they're all being smug assholes.
TweekDash 4 months ago
@TweekDash It's hard not to be when you're talking to people with the mind of a child.
KingWithoutaCause 4 months ago
@surefire1986 Tracie is hot. Intelligent women are hot.
ScientificBob 4 months ago
Fucking moron, oh my god (pun intended) Christians make my head explode with their utter, utter stupidity.