Added: 2 years ago
From: ashhad1
Views: 25,523
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I absolutely love Alan.. I almost splattered wine all over my screen..

  • How could they possibly know what percentage of men in the 40s used hookers?

  • I thought Sean was going to say that the guy was drinking Baileys out of a shoe, a bit disappointed when he said vodka.

  • @lrhea83 that reminds me of Old Greg from the Mighty Boosh

  • hehe I LOVE this show!!!!!

  • god i love the comments of this video so rarely you see arguments about differentiation on youtube

  • Bloody hell, i thought @snowblind1985 was joking....

  • Who the fuck is Dave Spikey? Thank god they got rid of him. He's like your mate's embarrassingly horrid dad.

  • now here i was thinking "hey i have couple of comments by the panel members that i found really funny and i want to post them.." and i scroll down to post it and suddenly i see everyone discussing algebra.. i had to scroll back up and check what i was watching

  • @snowblind1985 I do believe it's calculus.

  • @InNewMusicWeTrust1 well done you, getting your masters degree at the age of 15.

    Next time at least make sure your profile corroborates your lie

  • If Beckham cannot do BASIC maths. he should try this

    Dy/Dx of 2(X+5^3/4)

    this is easy.

  • @ne1l007 that doesnt even make sence m8 and i have a math's masters degrie

  • @InNewMusicWeTrust1

    Degrie??

    I bet you do not have a maths masters.

    That was a basic question i asked.

    Differentate with respect to X the equation

    2 bracket X plus 5, to the power three quaters. .

    which will give you 2..

    a very basic form of differentation

  • @ne1l007

    Hmm it should be d(2(x+5^3/4))/dx or first define y = 2(x+5^3/4), and ask what is dy/dx. In your problem formulation you have not defined y, which is why as posed the question has no solution.

  • @moridin909

    you can still solve it. it will be a 1 over something answer

  • @ne1l007

    It will be zero as y is not given to be a function of x. Hence, when you differentiate it wrt x, it will be zero.

  • @moridin909 This would make the equation unsolvable, not zero, wouldn't it?

  • @Hetobox

    Right, heto see my original post. The question as posed cannot be solved. However, in the absence of any other information, we can at best say that y is not related to x. Hence, the first order differential of y wrt x will be zero.

  • @moridin909 My point is that we shouldn't assume y is unrelated to x. We should leave it at what you first said; the equation is, with present data, unsolvable (and irrationally posed).

  • @Hetobox

    I agree.

    

  • @InNewMusicWeTrust1 must have got that masters degree off th back of a cereal box...very simple differentiation

  • @ne1l007 What a toss pot

  • I'd love all the guesses on what the Russian's are afriad of

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more