schlesinger is an idiot. when he criticized christy for the climate models, christy said "the data already shows the climate models are wrong but lets ASSUME that the climate models are right
The quality of Christy's climate models is essential to his argument. "We agree ... that our method ... introduced a spurious component," as he and a co-author write in a 2005 letter to _Science_, doesn't encourage belief, I'm afraid. When others note the same spurious component first appeared in their papers in 1998 and is an obvious sign-flip error (the troposphere must warm at night and cool in the day), one has to wonder if Christy can be trusted to make models that contradict his belief.
schlesinger is an idiot. when he criticized christy for the climate models, christy said "the data already shows the climate models are wrong but lets ASSUME that the climate models are right
tippman2k01 10 months ago
Think Christy is saying (without saying) is that he trusts his models........think I do too...
bfpccbm 2 years ago
The quality of Christy's climate models is essential to his argument. "We agree ... that our method ... introduced a spurious component," as he and a co-author write in a 2005 letter to _Science_, doesn't encourage belief, I'm afraid. When others note the same spurious component first appeared in their papers in 1998 and is an obvious sign-flip error (the troposphere must warm at night and cool in the day), one has to wonder if Christy can be trusted to make models that contradict his belief.
dossthane 2 years ago
At 4:25 "we're being unrealistic about the magnitude of the problem."
No, he's being unrealistic about how much CO2 humans produce.
anoniab 3 years ago