Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (375)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • O STFU ITS A FUNNY COMMERCIAL GET OVER YOUR SELVES

  • BONEYARD:

    "O STFU ITS A FUNNY COMMERCIAL GET OVER YOUR SELVES"

    >> No, little sheeple.

    We'll get over you instead. Have a BEAUTIFUL DAY!

    Oh, uh, by the way, there were SIX commercials featured in this video, genius.

    Not just one. Care to specify which one you were mindlessly speaking of?

    --The Final Justice

  • Barbaric subliminal messages. Despicable. Thanks for this great video FinalJusticeMovement.

  • @FinalJusticeMovement i can't believe i loved women after seeing all this

  • This is quite absurd. I'm against radical feminists myself but to suggest that there is some secret leftist campaign to destroy the rights of men through is ridiculous. You are reading way too far into this and it nothing but conspiracy theory bullshit. And this whole channel just seems to want to put men over women instead of having an equal society. Also, before 100 years ago, women had no rights. I believe in equality while you guys just seem to want to get the women back into the kitchen.

  • Well, Nick, I must say thank you for that SPLENDID comment of yours,

    It gives great indication of how much of a sexist you really are,

    (not to mention your low attention span).

    1) The campaign to destroy the rights of men is NO LONGER SECRET.

    This video illustrates how LIVE and IN YOUR FACE it really is.

    2) If women had no rights 100 years ago, does that mean men shall

    have NO rights 100 years LATER? That;s NOT equality!

    3) WE NEVER SUGGESTED that women should be in the kitchen.

    YOU DID!

    --FJ

  • @ledzeppelinandthewho my my biggest fail ive seen lol

    ignorant people just put their failure n fail for a more than an obvious reason, but you are beyond that, literally. not just completely ignorant but trying to give such a pathetic justification? mhmmmm.... i cant allow you to live at this rate thats for sure

  • Its about time... The Final Justice be done!

    HAILLLLLL!!!!

    "REAL MEN! REAL WOMEN! STANDING TOGETHER IN REAL TRUTH!"

  • You guys are INSANE.

  • @AudioForAnarchists you are a disgrace on humanity n i dont need to listen to any such opinions. why am i even bothering to reply? coz sum1 needs to remove bullsh1t from the world

  • What can the rest of us do to help? I want to do my part to get this siege engine rolling.

  • Good question, Juggernaut.

    1) Produce videos against misandric ads.

    2) Bombard the companies AND their advertising agencies with calls,

    E-mails, and other means of communication telling them to STOP.

    3) Organize with other men and like-minded women to do the same thing.

    4) AVOID patronizing their products and services, and organize your

    peoples to do the same.

    5) If you have children, don't allow them to purchase or patronize the

    products or services of these companies.

    --The Final Justice

  • @FinalJusticeMovement

    Thanks mate, making videos sounds particularly appealing. At the moment, I'm talking to guys about it and revealing some of the lies perpetrated by feminism, and this is having some effect. I will be writing letters to these companies in the very near future. Thank you for the reply, and greetings from Australia!

  • @FinalJusticeMovement

    Thank you for this video, and information. I will be posting this to facebook, and twitter, and forwarding it to friends and associates alike. Thank you for uploading this. Your labor is greatly appreciated.

  • Thank you much, C-Bone.

    Send us your social netlinks via PM.

    --The Final Justice

  • Please watch the video again carefully, 192. Use your mind to grasp the

    concept of subliminal imagery, and you'll see with crystal-clear vision that

    everything you see is in your face as opposed to being a conspiracy.

    It is FACT that the CEO of Pepsi is a female, and ever since she took office,

    Pepsi has stepped up their game in their mission to demonize men

    and it is also documented that PepsiCo funds the homosexualist agenda.

    Yes, ALL of this is VERY unsettling, because it's very true.

    --FJ

  • @825pink did you know that rape shield law is gender neutral? If anyone accuses anyone of a crime the accused is going to have their name in the news whether they are innocent or guilty. That is not the product of law that is the product of the public sphere. Read FRE 412. A defendant is allowed to challenge the accuseds veracity but not ther propensity. It seems like you get you're knowledge about the lw from the very same place you criticize: the amorphous news media.

  • @reggie0

    Actually, it's the mainstream media news that I have a problem with. And it makes no difference how a law is written, only how it's practiced. VAWA, for example, is supposed to protect women from violence. But in practice, it virtually guarantees that only men will be arrested in DV cases. See the following link: The law is also unconstitutional.

  • @reggie0

    Sorry, I guess You Tube doesn't allow anyone to post a link. I'll try to figure out another way to forward the information to you and get back to you.

    As I was starting to say, VAWA is unconstitutional, as it is in direct violation of the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which clearly states that no one group shall be afforded more protection than another.

  • @reggie0

    Alright, try Googling phyllis Schlafly and VAWA and you'll find a number of articles she has written about VAWA. Her articles are deadly accurate as any male who has ever become a victim of it will tell you. I have a friend who used to think very differently about domestic violence. Like most women, she thought the laws are gender-neutral until her 37-year-old son was sentenced to 2 months in jail after finally defending himself against his wife who had been beating on him for years.

  • By the way, I jacked off and ejaculated into a tissue and flushed it down the toilet last night. The sperm could have produced a baby. I guess I'm a MURDERER! *GASP*

  • To to all you anti-choice motherfuckers, all you care about is the goddamn fetus. You don't give a rat's ass about the kid. If you did give a rat's ass about the kid, you wouldn't want a child to be born to a mother who isn't fit and financially ready to support him/her. Abortion is NOT murder. Murder is a legal term. Abortion is legal. Therefore, it's not murder. Oh, and read a goddamn science book.

  • @psx2514

    You have absolutely no class or any brains. What would an imbecile like you know about science anyway? What a joke...

  • @825pink. Geez, with all the time you spent on here addressing comments from months ago you'd think that you'd add something new to the conversation. By the way, have you ever read ANY of the caselaw leading up to things like the rape shield laws? Have you ever even read the law? Next thing you'll be telling me is that a womens right to vote is anti male.

  • @reggie0

    Did you know that if a woman accuses a man of rape, even if it's a false allegation, his name and face will be plastered all over the Internet, newspapers and TV news while the accuser remains anonymous? This is one of the effects of Rape Shield. Case-in-point was the 3 Duke University Lacrosse athletes whose lives were ruined by this law. Their accuser Crystal Gail Mangrum remains a free woman despite her felonious actions.

  • @reggie0

    I just joined the post and many of the comments I addressed are recent. No, I don't think any of women's rights, including her right to vote, are anti-male. Anti-male legislation such as Affirmative Action, VAWA and Rape Shield are.

  • what the hell is this garbage? get a life, loser

  • @nicky2coats

    So, just because someone posts the other side of the story, one that the mainstream media won't reveal, it makes him a loser? Who do you think you are anyway?

  • @825pink Yah, the maintstream is bashing Males... Because he posted a few commericals where things happened to them. Your also rite all the companys ever do this just for laughs. See how smart I look because Im on your side?

  • @Ruzlier

    Come on, Ruzlier, Watch a day's-worth of commercials. It's not just a few that were posted on this video.

    And, no, you don't look smart with your lousy spelling and puctuation.

  • Search: Disclosures From an InsiderBy Deanna Spingola, and then turn on your television, simply amazing.

  • what the fuck is your problem, its fucking jokes get the fuck over u fucking prick stop being a fucking baby put ur big boy pants on and look at the fucking truth, the world isnt a fucking day care where equallity is key

  • @Ruzlier

    It's a shame that your vocabulary is limited to the "F" word. Keep in mind that such expletives are not a substitute for intelligence.

  • @825pink YOUR A FUCKING MORON. STOP TRYING TO ACT LIKE ANYONE IS ON YOUR SIDE AND YOU ARE RITE, I USE FUCK BECAUSE IT SHOWS ANGER YOU IDIOT. GET OVER YOUR SELF BITCH. ITS YOUTUBE COMMENTS NOT SOME SHIT WHERE YOU HAVE TO USE PROPER LANGUAGE YOU STUPID FUCK. FUCK FUCK FUCKITY FUCK FUCKER FUCKER FUCK. WHAT YOU GOING TO FUCKING DO? CRY I SAID fUCK? PROBABLY!

  • @Ruzlier

    So you can swear... I'm impressed. What else can you do?

  • @825pink Yah I can smoke weed, pop pills and kill people, drink and jump behind the wheel like it was still legal. I can kill you, I can kill your family, am i going to? NOPE.

  • @Ruzlier

    First of all, you need to learn how to spell "yeah" and thank God you're able to post here anonymously, huh?

  • @Ruzlier

    Come to think of it, I think I'll refer your comment  to YouTube and to the authorities.

  • @825pink srry for the late, and your reporting me? That shows me your a pussy ass bitch. Your a bitch. No one likes you probably, I don't even fucking care. I was reported on FBI's own website, for stealing a paypal with a RAT and sending 40 bucks to a friends paypal. They didn't do shit. Now go tell the cops i smoke weed drink and pop pills, even though i was mocking you. And tell them I said i am NOT going to kill you to. GO ahead. Fucking bitch.

  • I don't want a comments reply back but I seriously think your overthinking these commericals. Do you really believe a director of a chip commercial would put that much thought behind it? I bet that none of them even know what your talking about. So I see the video as just trying to make controversy or speculation out of nothing. Because really, are you honestly saying that a director of a commercial was thinking about court cases when making the commercial. NO. He was just trying to get a laugh

  • LGD,

    How could I NOT reply to someone who happens to be a part of the very same

    problem and actually has the nerve to accuse us of creating speculation of

    nothing? -- Yeah, of COURSE, it means nothing to you because (just like Lady

    Gaga), MEN don't mean anything to you.

    Moreover, I observe your reducent language and I deduce that not only do the

    advertisers know what they were doing, but so do YOU. The real question is:

    If any of these ads were filmed in reverse, would YOU laugh?

    --FJ

  • @FinalJusticeMovement Hey man, you're on point. You are most DEFINITELY NOT looking too far into these commercials. These depictions of men are deliberately, coldy calculated to be denigrating. These ads are designed to belittle men in the eyes of women and their children. It is a sickness of society that people, men and women, continue to tolerate them.

    Don't stop speaking up. And great video!

  • Thanks much, Hippy.

    And NO, we will NOT stop speaking out against this.

    We will have a video in the near future regarding an atrocious

    beer ad which declares war on men. Stay tuned.

    --The Final Justice

  • @nippyhippy123

    You stated this very well and accurately. And you're right, it's not going to end until people stop tolerating it!

  • @nippyhippy123

    I'm glad you see this for what it is. The more the better.

  • @FinalJusticeMovement Wow, you really have nothing better to do with your lives? Like seriously, do you think most of America really thinks this hardly about a 30 second Doritos commercial? Most people just laugh and move on with their lives. It's really not that big deal, it's harmless. And females do worse than that on TV and now they are glorified in America.

  • Most of America doesn't think at ALL, LGD! And that's the whole point!

    Most people DO just laugh and move on with their lives. This is because

    people take their lives for one big collective joke, and they wonder why they

    suffer constant hardship and daily tribulation.

    And if you think that the glorification of female violence on men on TV OR in

    real life is harmless, then quite frankly, you need your head examined... STAT!

    --The Final Justice

  • @FinalJusticeMovement It wasn't about humiliating people or making themselves feel less manly, it was just a funny commercial people thought was entertaining. ALSO. I never said that their was glorification of female violence on men. I said that a kid slapping a man is less then what females do to other females on TV, these PEOPLE are glorified even though they act crazy. And you want to why? It's because it's entertaining and dramatic. It's reality. It's not made up to emasculate men or females

  • Advertising and media in general (and I do believe you are intelligent enough

    in your manipulative language to know this) are conveying the attitudes of

    modern society, which is "respect women, deride men" /

    "women are noble, men are trivial" / "women are smart, men are a big joke"

    -- shall I go on?

    The fact remains that a woman would NEVER get slapped on a TV ad

    by a child. If you can show evidence of an epidemic to the contrary,

    feel free to do so.

    --The Final Justice

  • @FinalJusticeMovement I understand what your saying. You wanna know why though? Because 70 plus years ago. Women had NO rights what. so. ever. Before, woman were treated or perceived as worse than what you "think" men are being perceived as today. And it dates back to way way way way back. Men have been known to be the warriors and can take a punch. Women have been known to be taking care of the kids and getting an education. That's how it was. THere was no other way.

  • @LadyGaGaDemos

    So that's the justification for male bashing? That because women were not always treated fairly in the distant past that TODAY'S men should pay for this? Let me ask you something- If you're driving down the road and you notice your car is pulling to the right, do you take your car into a service station and have the mechanic now adjust it so your car pulls way to the left or do you have them simply straighten the wheel alignment? There is no justification for male-bashing.

  • @FinalJusticeMovement stopo putting ur gay little thing at the end saying ur name, youtube puts ur name there for you fucking idiot

  • @LadyGaGaDemos

    Why is it that male-on-female violence in the media is considered "violence against women' yet female-on-male violence is considered "entertainment?" This is exactly the double-standard that exists in the media and our society. If we were to reverse the roles of the characters in commercials we'd have every feminist screaming at the top of their lungs. So why should men just suck it up?

  • @LadyGaGaDemos

    Wrong again. It is NOT harmless. Everyone with half a brain knows that the media has tremendous influence on the beliefs and attitudes of its viewers. From the time a child is old enough to understand what he/she sees on TV, he/she starts to learn "men bad, women good. Dad's an idiot, Mom's a hero."

    The sad thing is, this insidious propaganda from the mainstream media is hurting EVERYONE, not only males. Most people just don't realize it.

  • @LadyGaGaDemos

    Wrong again. Everyone with half a brain understands that the media has an enormous affect on its viewers' beliefs and attitudes. From the time a child is old enough to understand what he/she is viewing on TV, he/she learns "men bad, women good. Dad's an idiot, Mom's a hero.

    This insidious propaganda from the media is hurting EVERYONE including females. Most people just don't know it.

  • @825pink I have never seen a child think that you bitch

  • @Ruzlier

    Well, you have a lot to learn then, don't you?

  • @LadyGaGaDemos

    Don't you get it? Media advertisers and producers know EXACTLY what they're doing. If you have been studying this as many years as I have you'd understand it. When you know who owns and controls the media you'll understand the reason behind it.

    People like you who trivialize these types of commercials perpetuate this viscous virus of male-bashing that's been plaguing our society for decades because you clearly know nothing about what's behind them.

  • @825pink I get what your saying. But most people including myself have better things to do in life than think about a silly commercial. NO ONE CARES. I'm a male and I'm not offended. It's like, do something else with your life instead of wasting years on commercials.

  • @LadyGaGaDemos

    If it were only commercials it would be one thing but it's not. Our entire society has become largely anti-male and the commercials, sitcoms movies, etc. reflect and reinforce it. The problem extends into anti-male legislation, the educational system and virtually every other area of our society.

  • uhhhh..I don't know how to saythis but..the first one scared me a bit..the way you linked that watermelon to current issues with background muisc. Seriously, I only felt that atomsphericly chilled sinced SIlent Hill...

    your good.

  • All I can say on that one, Sulvuss, is... thank you.

    --The Final Justice

  • No, of course you're right. This sort of propaganda has spread around the world starting in America. We fight not with guns but with principles. A lot of principled women are also on our side, by the way. Women like our grandparent's generation.They expect us to stand up to these monsters ! We will. For our own dignity and well-being as a planet. It must happen or the family will die-and then we're finished! Greetings from Moscow.

  • @334286

    I'm glad you mentioned grandparents. It's funny how we keep hearing so much about how oppressed women in the past were in the U.S. Yeah, they couldn't vote until a certain point but, according to my late grandmothers, who were born in the early 20th century, female oppression in the U.S. was virtually non existent and has been so over-blown by the media.

  • Women are not equal to men so why should they be treated equally?

  • Good question indeed.

    Many women don't seem to want equality in the first place,

    not even so much as common courtesy at times,

    so why should we accommodate them with even the time of day?

    Am I wrong on this one or what, 334?

    --The Final Justice

  • @FinalJusticeMovement YOUR A MOTHER FUCKING JOKE!

  • @Ruzlier Take a look in the mirror, dum-dum.

    YOU are the joke, and you're not even funny.

    Your overuse of the "F" word doesn't impress me or anyone else.

    You might as well go troll somewhere else.

    --The Final Justice

  • @FinalJusticeMovement IM NOT A TROLL, HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU STAND YOURSELF? YOUR PROBABLY IN PETA TOO FOR FUCKS SAKE. WHAT THE HELL IS FUCKED UP IN UR HEAD 

  • I'm a female and football fan. I know exactly what this video is confronting and I agree. The worst part about watching football are the lousy commercials, especially the beer commercials that portray young men as a bunch of stupid clowns---the females are no different, but the guys are always the main fools on those commercials. Now I hope you guys know that not all women are in favor of these sick commercials, right?

  • Indeed, Fury. This is why we have an open forum

    for women such as you to speak out this nonsense.

    Furthermore, I hope you have taken deep account as to the analysis

    within this video which thoroughly breaks down the etymology of

    how these commercials deliberately target and seek to malign men.

    --The Final Justice

  • @FinalJusticeMovement Yeah. I never seen the watermelon commercial, but I see what's going on. There is a deeper meaning in these twisted commercials.

  • @FinalJusticeMovement the great part is "women have the correct opinion", nice. But please just keep it locked up in your pretty little head, the men are in discussion now. Shhhhh. RE; Furygirl

  • Do you wanna bring us up to speed as to why you directed that

    smarmy, smart-aleck remark at Fury?

    --The Final Justice

  • @pachuansam wow, you got a long way to go. Like o'rielly and so many others . why in the hell would you want a woman taking up talk time with chicken scratch yada,yadah ? That's AUTHORITY talking not smart alecky. Wich side are you on ?

  • @XiaoFury

    I'm a woman who hates this male-bashing crap, too, XiaoFury! Thank you for your thoughts! Men rock!!

  • @825pink Well, I suppose they do. lol

  • Isn't Mountain Dew the drink that lowers a man sperm count, cause impotency, and prostate & testicular cancer. Of course they are anti-male.

  • Actually, what you were talking about in particular was Tropical Fantasy

    and other soda brands which have the same particular ingredients.

    But soda is no good for you in general, and so, the point is still made.

    --The Final Justice

  • @FinalJusticeMovement I know it was Mountain Dew because they made a public announcement on the news in my city. I am also aware that there are other sodas like Tropical Fantasy which have the same effects. You are right soda is not good at all. It can cause cavities, diabetes, cancer, destroys bones, and other mass ailments.

  • Wow. I watched the first two minutes and couldn't watch any more. Your analysis' are nothing but assumptions. You claim to be logical, but rather, you are imagining evidence that doesn't exist.

  • WRONG, Kiki!

    What is plainly and painfully obvious is that you have no concept of subliminal

    imagery and symbolism, no concept of the reality that misandry is deliberately

    infused in modern pop culture, and no concept of achieving (or at least

    campaigning for) true gender equality between men and women.

    There are no assumptions here, except the assumption YOU just made

    from watching only TWO minutes. If you watch the rest, you can make a

    better, more informed opinion.

    --The Final Justice

  • @kikitoldskewl

    You have no idea what you're saying. It is YOU who are making assumptions. Study this for years like I have and learn something!

  • Wow. A watermelon meaning money, sperm, baby's blood, testicles and baby testicles? This is almost as bad as English Literature work. Can we stop over-analyzing things that weren't meant to be over-analyzed? It's a watermelon because its roughly the same size as a baby, you absolute paranoic. Also, if you spend the time to make this video and attack women then you are either showing your fear of them being stronger, or being a bully towards a weaker race. Either way you're a c***.

  • Call me what you will, dunce.

    But obviously this must have been the best work of English Literature

    you've seen in video to date, or you wouldn't hate it so much.

    1) In case your vision is impaired, THE TEXT READS that the watermelon

    itself represents THE BABY (obvious, if you paid attention).

    2) We said NOTHING about baby testicles.

    3) Female is a GENDER, not a RACE.

    4) Men and women are EQUALLY capable of doing anything humanly

    possible, so we treat women with POINT BLANK EQUALITY!

    --FJ

  • Hey FinalJusticeMovement! As a logical man, I have to say you're a dumbass conspiracy theory redneck idiot. I'm saving up my money to get working brains for you types! Maybe by the year 5000 (if you fucking morons don't blow up the planet before then) we'll actually have a society of people who can think for themselves instead of parroting stupid bullshit. Fuck off and die.

  • As the only logical man between us, ClitSalad, I'd say you're just inherently stupid. I'm surprised you could actually write as well as you do, but the fact that you used the word "logical" out of context and couldn't show and prove it says a lot about you. If we could blow up anything, it would more than likely be your trailer park. because we can do a lot better without any further idiocratic inbreeding. You choke on a dildo and YOU die. (Then again, you're already dead... mentally.) --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement, though I would rather not get too involved in this, I feel as though you should know that responses like this hurt your legitimacy, therefore lessening the believability of your online persona and or "organization". Although most people won't pick up on this, the ones who do will do so instantly, and then lose all interest. I would suggest using a more logical, calm, and impersonal tone. When you engage in childish bickering it only takes away the intensity and urgency.

  • Chet,

    Please be specific in what you are referring to.

    Responses like what?

    --The Final Justice

  • @FinalJusticeMovement, I was referring to your use of phrases like "You choke on a dildo and YOU die. (Then again, you're already dead... mentally.", personal user name changing insults such as "ClitSalad", and classist statements like "If we could blow up anything, it would more than likely be your trailer park. because we can do a lot better without any further idiocratic inbreeding".

  • @clintallen123

    I've seen fence posts with higher IQs than yours.

  • @clintallen123

    I've seen fence posts with higher I.Q.s than yours.

  • THIS IS RETARDED

  • Yes, I agree, Ann.

    The mistreatment of men on TV AND in society

    IS retarded. Let's just hope you're not in the

    same category.

    --The Final Justice

  • and the man is expected to pay for the house he has no rights over

    The hidden symbolism stuff, even if it were true it'd make MRA sound like a conspiracy theory to the general public - and put men off who might otherwise join.

    forget some advert - 100 more men per 100,000 per year die of easilly preventable diseases, and accidents, than women. We need to focus on reality not TV, even if that is a problem its in the background.

    The advert analysis (if thats what it is) is SPOT ON

  • The fact of the matter, UA, is that if we're going to

    address misandry, we must address it from ALL

    aspects, points, and scenarios. I don't care whether

    or not people consider us to be conspiracy theorists.

    If conspiracy IS truth, then it's no longer theory, but fact.

    We're speaking the truth here that can and will NEVER

    be seen on the national news. People always balk at

    what ACTUAL conspiracy theorists say... and only SOME

    regret it when what they heard ultimately becomes reality.

    --FJ

  • @FinalJusticeMovement

    I'm not sure if you were analyizing what the fact that superbowl is airing these adverts - and what that has to say about men's place in our culture, and potential impacts of these adverts on men - or were literally claiming the adverts were designed to keep men down. I doubt they think think that far ahead - they're probably just trying to sell their product but how to sell it with women doing all the buying with their husband's money means denigrating men even more...

  • UA, NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE MINDSTATE OF MAJOR MEDIA!! OF COURSE, they're thinking WELL AHEAD to produce the commercials, films, and music EXACTLY the way they intended them to be. There was NO COINCIDENCE here WHATSOEVER with these ads or with the way media conducts itself. And YES, they were ALSO designed to keep men down (although most men can't see it for themselves), but this is BECAUSE of the impact the misandry in these ads have on men, women, family, society, and government. --FJ
  • Men had no reproductive rights before roe vs wade

    it just gave women a right men didn't have

    if men got to choose to make her abort (probably a bit extreme considering she does have to recover after) he would have some rights

    a more fitting response would be if he could choose not to pay goddamn child support

    I'm assuming you've seen menwomenmyths videos on domestic abuse in media?

    the media is fueling and simultaneously reflecting reality by portraying women as the prize :/

  • this chip commercial is nothing but feminism at work which is a tool of the new world order 2 destroy the family unit

  • Great video!

  • I have an answer to whether or not a boy hitting a gold digging woman would be appropriate: No, BUT a little girl hitting a gold digging woman would be equally as funny. Comedy is often about disassociation, putting people in roles they aren't NORMALLY seen in. That's why a dog walking a person is funny, but a person walking a dog is not because it's what you normally see. I sincerely hope this analysis was a joke; it reminds me of the pseudo-intellectual in a lit class grasping at straws.

  • Well, MS. Reggie-O, In case you've just arrived on this planet, men ARE ALWAYS portrayed as morons and cretins in advertising, in music, in media, in law enforcement, and in the legal system. As such, this is the everyday view of men in general. You being female, this is what you've been taught, you've absorbed it, and now you feel that men are nothing more than comedy. Well, I've got news for ya. The video you saw was NOT A JOKE! A heart attack was nowhere close to how serious we are! --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement I never berated you for being male, nor did I make any generalizations based on your gender. Unlike your clear disdain for my view, being the "impressionable female" I am (emphasizing "MS." and "yo being female", my critique of your viewpoint was based solely on the merits of your argument. Next time, I'd suggest doing the same if indeed you want to be taken seriously. I have no respect for a person, male or female, who makes generalizations based solely on gender.

  • Indeed, it has been a while, Ms. Reggie-O. Let me just state for the record that the point you attempted to make in your original post was clear, concise, and understood. I CAN separate folly from reality. But when it comes down to issues involving men and misandry, we take them VERY seriously and we leave NOTHING to chance. Surely, you wouldn't expect groups of women to compromise themselves on account of anything they consider to be objectionable of women and girls in media, would you? --FJ
  • (continued) Well, Ms. Reggie, neither do we. I had no disdain for your view whatsoever, and no, you did NOT berate the male gender. Understand, however, that our position here at FJM is an uncompromising one, where we hold a firm stand on our principles, our morals, our mission, and true gender equality. Our generalizations are NEVER made solely on gender. But as you can see clearly in this video, the way these ads were constructed WERE based SOLELY on gender, and even more so on misandry. -FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement Additionally, SIR, you don't get respect by demanding it, you get respect by earning it. Even with woman, this is the case. Sure, there is a PC aspect with regard to women, but TRUE respect comes from your actions male or female, not from toting ideal via outlandish analysis of marketing at work. I grew up between 2 brothers and a strong mother AND father. And what you're doing here is essentially COMPLAINING; your emulating in women's movement what you dislike.

  • As far as the PC aspect in dealing with women -- well, we don't cater to that here. Either, people learn to live with and handle the hardcore truth (or at least the harshness that comes with such territory), or move on and continue living ignorantly. The time for mincing words is over. The time for men and boys being looked upon and treated likewise by women, the media, the government, and the world at large as lower than the scum of the universe is DEFINITELY OVER and DONE! NO MORE! --FJ
  • Now, just because our deep analysis of misandric advertising and marketing is unusual to you and others who are otherwise used to the everyday wishy-washiness of modern media doesn't make it outlandish, and for you to suggest that it is nothing more than complaining is rather arrogant of you, is very telling of your "impressionability", and justifies our original reply to you 2 months ago. If you are truly for equality between men and women, why not protest these ads just the same? --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement No. I still disagree. Protesting ads is at best unnecessary and at worst, counterproductive to your "cause". And if it were a women's movement doing it I'd say the exact same thing. You don't change hearts and minds by critiquing institutions that are motivated not by some higher agenda but rather simply money. Melodramatic analysis or not, all it does it get people who already agree with you to agree with you, which I assume isn't all you're looking to get out of it.

  • Ms. Reg, Although you say that you'd treat the women's movement the same, it's clear you're speaking from a sense of accommodation, one who does not know or understand how these ads affect men and boys because you've never experienced such atrocity. Also, it's clear you're trying to get the best of me with your insults, which will not work. The point remains the same -- money IS part of the higher agenda, which is: BLIND, CONFUSE, DIVIDE, and CONQUER the people. Seems like you fell for it. --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement How, exactly, is it clear I'm being accommodating? You think as a female I've never been pushed by media too look or act a certain way? Of course I've been told that. EVERYONE is told that by marketing, it's how they sell product. But I rose above it, and didn't let it effect me just as I believe these ads won't effect males that have any sense of self worth. And it isn't you I'm insulting, it's your methods and logic diminishing what I believe are good intentions.

  • Fair enough, Ms. Reg. But I didn't say that you were being accomodat-ING. I said that you were speaking from a state of accomoda-TION, meaning that one is so used to being treated in certain ways that the possibility of being treated otherwise seems almost non-existent. So you claim to have risen above manipulative media. Well, so have I -- In fact, I never really fell prey to it. This is why I do what I do, but we are only 2 out of BILLIONS of people. (to be continued) --The Final Justice
  • And out of these billions of people, a heavy percentage of us have no self-worth to begin with. Many parents have now left and are willingly leaving their children to be raised and socially engineered by the media to become self-destructive zombies. But the worst casualties of this social engineering is the male gender, which (especially through ill parenting skills) ultimately results in most of them NOT having a sense of self-worth. These ads reflect a reality that society wants. --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement My original complaint is that you're grasping at straws dissecting the ads. ads serve a simple purpose: get THAT person to buy THAT thing. With the continuously growing women's work force, it will soon be impractical for ads to make men buy everything. fact is it's mostly men watching the superbowl and ads will use anything "guilt, lust, etc" to get you to buy their product.

  • Indeed, you were, and I knew that's what you were hinting at, which is why I blasted at you in the first place, because there were no straws. just the hardcore truth about SUBLIMINAL and SYMBOLIC tactics in advertising (particularly directed at the male gender) which is what YOU didn't get (or otherwise don't want to get). And SPEAKING of the "continuously growing women's workforce", did you know that the main contributing factor of that is the employers' DELIBERATE REFUSAL of hiring men? --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement Continued: I could easily argue certain ads today insult women by portraying us as vapid materialistic bitches, and that clearly you fell for THAT assumption. Do you propose that marketing be stricken from the face of the earth? Because until that happens, they WILL continue to capitalize on our most impressionable, and exploit our fears and desires, no matter who the demographic is.

  • In hindsight, Ms. Reg, I would say that both

    men and women are portrayed negatively, but whether

    or not that is so is irrelevant for these key reasons:

    1) Women still have more protections in law and are given

    greater (and, for the most part, AUTOMATIC) leniency for

    felonious crimes that men would be harshly punished for.

    2) Women will still be looked at good, smart, and beautiful,

    and men will ALWAYS be portrayed and looked down upon

    as evil, dumb, ugly, and repugnant, by SOCIETY AT LARGE!

    -FJ

  • @reggie0 I think your being overly negative. It's true younger woman are "looked at" as you say. But what is the use in just being looked at if you're not going to be taken seriously? Second, men are much more respected as they grow older, while women continue to loose their value. AKA as a society, men "age better" than women.

  • If the truth is overly negative, then that's what it is. But that's no reflection on ME, my friend. Furthermore, I would appreciate it if you could be a little more serious in this discussion, as you know EXACTLY what I mean by the term "looked at". Also, I never mentioned ANYTHING about youth, especially since age is a moot point. Females of ALL ages and backgrounds STILL have more legal protection than males and are STILL considered beautiful and good from first to final hour. (TBC) --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement Well, if that's how you feel that's obviously how it will be. Perception is everything. And you're STILL making overarching generalizations. You seem to think society has a view that a female can do no wrong, when that just isn't true.  My advice is the same advice I give to raging feminists: stop acting persecuted and start living your life the way you want to because you CAN. You don't like an ad? Boycott the product, don't waste time making a superfluous dissection.

  • You don't get it, do you, Ms. Reg? PEOPLE other than you and I cannot choose to take a firm stand on something they may or may not know is wrong unless they KNOW about it.. I am here providing information about how and why people are being indoctrinated through media to hate, disrespect, dishonor, and disenfranchise men and boys in everyday life. If you expect me to just lay down and be quiet about emphasizing true equality and the protection of the male gender, then you expected wrong! --FJ
  • Perception IS everything, and THAT'S THE POINT! What you consider an "overarching generalization" is actually a hardcore, unsweetened reflection of how society and government generalize, categorize and stigmatize the male gender on a whole-- something YOU HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED! This is why you don't seem to care as much as you should about this matter. Men ARE persecuted, but what we want is for them to stand AGAINST the persecution, BOYCOTT ALL of these entities and take their lives back! -FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement Yeah, I'm sorry the Man, oh sorry, the WOMAN is bringing you down. It's obvious nothing is going to change your mind on how to deal with that situation. Like it or not PR and bottom lines make change and you can win if you play in the lines. That's what you're not doing. You're alienating potential supporters with your media conspiracy theories. It makes you instantly trollable.

  • Look who's playing victim now. Instead of perceiving my activism as an attack on YOU personally, READ EVERY WORD I say and PAY ATTENTION to them, and you'll find that I have ACTUALLY AGREED with much of what you've said. I'll say it again -- we're not here to play victim, but rather to acknowledge what we are up against in the legal system, the political arena, in the job market, in legislation, in the educational system, in the child care system, in society, in love, in law, and in life. --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement I'd like you to point out where exactly I played the victim. I don't see it. It also sounds as if, in your other response, that you believe our governmental structure is inherently broken. Have you also now graduated to from activist to revolutionary? Tell me how I was using the word "conspiracy" wrong again. And I did offer advice. Blunt tactics only go so far; work within the system in baby steps. It's not as romantic a notion but it's certainly more productive.

  • The governmental structure as we know it is, was, and always will be a machine, designed to keep all of its inhabitants mentally, physically, and politically enslaved as the media does. It was always broken, because it was intended never to be fixed (only but so much anyway). There is no "structure" -- just DE-struc-TION. BTW, you used the word "conspiracy" wrong by using it to imply that our position on misandric advertising was based on THEORY when THE EVIDENCE IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU! --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement Ok, so just to summarize. The government has always been a broken and destructive force designed to enslave humanity. And a theories like relativity have no posited evidence backing them, but your viewpoint on this is verifiable proof of a law of society because YOU have evidence. Therefore, I used the word conspiracy wrong. Truly a dizzying line of logic. Perhaps one day you'll lead a coup or secede from the union.

  • You can deny, deny, deny all you want. But I can guarantee that if this video pinpointed so-called "misogynistic" advertising, this wouldn't even be a discussion. Pick any of the ads you've seen and tell me how you cannot see the symbolic representations within them. Let's take the Diet Mountain Dew ad for instance: Are you saying that women draped in metal and standing in water ARE immune to lightning strikes? I take you to be more intelligent than that, Reg. Stop pretending you're not. --FJ
  • @FinalJusticeMovement No, I don't believe woman are immune to electricity anymore than I believe dogs can talk or outwit their owners. But that doesn't mean when I see an ad with a talking dog I think the ad is "saying something" about how dogs rule and humans drool.

  • That's great for you, and that goes the same for

    me. But do you understand now that we are the

    RARE EXCEPTIONS in this otherwise filthy

    equation?

    The fact remains that the world at large is not as

    unprogrammed as we are in such a regard. And

    as such, you should not object to the idea of pulling

    the blinders of misandric propaganda from their eyes.

    --The Final Justice

  • We DO have a bottom line, and we are (one way or another) evoking change with it. Whether you realize it or not, we cannot depend on government to help us change the situation as the concept of government being "for the people" is nothing more than a dangerous, obstructive fantasy that will CONTINUE to victimize us. Now, if you DO INDEED have any novel ideas as to how we can help our situation further, I'd love to hear them. Until then, look up the word "consipracy". Then, use it RIGHT! --FJ
  • @reggie0

    You're missing the point of Final.JusticeMovement's activism. Boycotting products and services does make a difference but only if enough people do it. The way to get enough people to do it is by getting the word out and spreading information as the subject video does. Come on, reggieO, do you really think one or two people boycotting a product is going to influence male-bashing ads?

  • @reggie0

    It's easy for a woman to say "stop acting persecuted", etc. when she is not vulnerable to anti-male legislation such as VAWA, Affirmative Action and Rape Shield.

    You've missed the point of @FinalJusticeMovement's activism. The boycotting of a product by a few people will have absolutely no impact on an advertiser, will it. Let's get real here. It takes hoards of people boycotting to make any difference, hence this subject video. The purpose is to wake enough people up to make change.

  • Furthermore, Ms. Reg, men USED TO BE respected as they grow older. Men are no longer respected in general, and this is especially due to the fact they have allowed themselves to be degraded, disrespected, and decimated. Women are considered more valuable (no matter whether or not their behavior or character is honorable or objectionable), while men are considered disposable and pretty much expendable (which is specifically why the Mountain Dew ads were made as they were). --The Final Justice
  • @reggie0 As for the comment that there is somehow a relationship between men being denied jobs in order for people to hire women instead. I'd like to see some empirical evidence for that. The work force is growing because a households economic needs are growing more demanding. Besides, wouldn't a movement like yours encourage women to seek their own pay so there is less exploitation of fund that you're so fond of accusing the opposite gender of?

  • Ms. Reg. Surely you didn't think that there would be no casualties from a massive (forced) takeover of the workplace, did you? The "empirical data" is all around you. First of all, you can check the stats from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (I did that just to confirm what I already knew). Secondly, the 2009 Women's Job Fair allowed men to participate FOR THE FIRST TIME in response to the disproportionate gender imbalance that they helped bring to the workplace in the first place. --FJ
  • @reggie0

    I'm sorry, Reggio, but you couldn't be more wrong. Self-esteem is built from the time a child is very young. With the media, education system, anti-male legislation hammering at males from the time they're born, they don't have much choice but to develop low self-esteem.

  • @reggie0

    Respect only comes from earning it? Tell that to the mainstream media, which constantly preaches to males to respect females, simply because they're females.

  • your vision of things is pretty big, i like that.

  • Hey Hey Poo PSX2514, Hey Hey, why don't you just shut up, open up your eyes and realize that there are Lefties that are Masculine Men and Father's and they deserve the Right to Be that Way. Stop Male hating, and be 4REAL, Stop supporting a Legal System that tries to make Mood Swing Fantasies a Reality. REMEMBER THE CONSTITUTION!??? REMEMBER THE BILL OF RIGHTS?!?!?? All are Created Equal, All Demand EQUITY, Since when is Feminism a Liberal Issue, IS IT TRUE LIBERALISM AND LIBERTARIAN deprive?

  • @Holuster45 What the fuck are you talking about? You sound like you're going on some kind of female emotional tirade. Next time, get your thoughts together. THEN comment.

  • @Holuster45 Oh, yes, the Constitution. Wasn't that the document that the Republicans and the Bush Administration shitted on?

  • @Holuster45 I'm male hating?! Are you fucking kidding me?!  How the fuck am I male hating?! First off I'm a huge Tom Leykis fan. Do you know who that is? If you listened to his show, you would KNOW that I'm not a male hater. Ya moron. How is me being pro abortion male hating? I agree that it's a woman's choice, but I don't agree that men should have to be responsible for that choice and be forced to PAY FOR IT. (cont)

  • @Holuster45 I love kids that why I hate it when so many kids are born to parents who are not fit/ready to raise them. This is why I have no respect for single mothers. Single mothers don't give a rat's ass about their kid. All they care about is trying to trap a man into a relationship or getting the man to pay child support and to "live up to his responsibilities." Now, if you were a real man, you would know exactly what I'm talking about.

  • Will somebody back me up here?

  • You have nothing to back up here, PSX. You've proven nothing except your status as a jackass and now you've made yourself look more like one. I've already made it clear that pulling out IS NOT GUARANTEED. DUH! That's obvious. (especially considering the P-C factor) But it HAS worked in MANY occasions. NOT MOST -- MANY! Either way, the man IS NOT THE ONLY ONE who should be responsible for BC. Maybe the best candidate for "backing you up" would pretty much be... you. BACK UP! --The Final Justice
  • @FinalJusticeMovement If you're using the pull-out method and you end up getting a girl pregnant because that method DOES NOT work it's you're own damn fault. You should be using a condom. PERIOD. Don't worry about what the woman is using a lot lie about being on birth control anyways. Besides, all you are is just another right wing anti-abortion wacko. That's IT. You make the men's rights movement look bad. I'm glad that abortion is available and legal. Otherwise, how are you going to..

  • Just because I stated a FACT WITHIN ANOTHER FACT doesn't mean I'm suggesting to my fellow men. On the contrary. It all depends on your relationship. But if you're having a one-night stand or you're just getting to know the woman sexually, then, by all means, USE THAT CONDOM! USE A CONDOM PERIOD! For the record, I'm neither a politician, nor am I a partisan, so your "anti-abortion" accusations won't work here. This is not the place for wild imaginations. --The Final Justice
  • @psx2514 Hey Poo Poo PSX2514, Hey, why don't you just shut up, open up your eyes and realize that there are Lefties that are Masculine Men and Father's and they deserve the Right to Be that Way. Stop Male hating, and be 4REAL, Stop supporting a Legal System that tries to make Mood Swing Fantasies a Reality. REMEMBER THE CONSTITUTION!? REMEMBER THE BILL OF RIGHTS?!? All are Created Equal, All Demand EQUITY, Since when is Feminism a Liberal Issue, IS IT TRUE LIBERALISM AND LIBERTARIAN deprive?

  • @psx2514

    According to Roe V. Wade, it's Her body and Her choice. So why isn't it her wallet, too. A woman has all the rights- she can keep the baby, she can abort it or, if she has the baby and decides she doesn't want it, she can take it to a fire station or other "safe house" with total anonymity. In other words, she cannot be forced into motherhood.

    But a man can be and often is forced into fatherhood with child support. Women are able to have their cake and eat it, too. Outrageous.

  • @FinalJusticeMovement use the hail mary on a chick in order to save your ass from having to pay child support. And the adoption system in this country is fucked up.  You don't know who the kid can end up with. Anyways, I'm done arguing with you. You have no logic. It's like arguing with a chick.

  • Dude, is this to fucking bash Roe V. Wade and abortion? I have to say thank goodness for Roe V. Wade. Do you have any idea how many unwanted children in the world there would be if it weren't for legalized abortion? Even if abortion was made illegal women would still find ways to get them. I'm pro abortion. I don't want kids, so if the condom slipped or broke and I knocked up some chick, I'd want her to get an abortion. If it weren't for Roe v. Wade, that might be a little difficult.

  • Have you ever heard of "pulling out" or WANTING HER to use contraception, PSX? See, you don't get it. 1) For every so-unwanted child, there's somebody who wants one. And in the case of unwed or newlywed mothers, many of them DO want the fruit of their conception for the SOLE purpose of collecting child support. 2) YOU HAVE NO SAY in the matter of an unwanted pregnancy, in that a woman can decide to go ahead and give birth to the child against your wishes, accident or not. --The Final Justice
  • @FinalJusticeMovement First of all, the pull out method DOESN'T work. Second, men need to be responsible for your own birth control, and should never trust a woman when she says she uses birth control. USE CONDOMS 100 % OF THE TIME. If you get a woman pregnant who lied to you that she used BC when she didn't, and you were stupid enough to not wrap it up, then it's you