150 years ago Darwin did not know what genes and DNA were; Arguing with Modern Evolution is a waste of time. Finding Gods connection with evolution makes a little more sense, Read the book finding Darwins God by Ken Miller a biologist who believes in God. The theory of evolution is no different from any other scientific theory, If you want evedence look at the fossile record.
This is all true. I own horses they have these things called chestnuts on the inside of the knee showing where some of there toes went.
You cant prove or disprove God through science because science only studies our physical reality; it has nothing to do with our non-physical reality. Nothing in Biology makes sense without evolution.
@maxhotchkiss1 I agree with you totally as an agnost myself. However: Science does proove itself, while religion does not. More and more things we find support science, and contradict or do not support religion. Let's take a wild guess as to which part MIGHT most likely be right, shall we?
@maxhotchkiss1 true, Intelligent Design and Young Earth Creationist organisations often misrepresent evolution by stating that it does not explain the origin of life. This is a dishonest tactic. Of course the theory of evolution doesn't explain the origin of life. It is not supposed to. The origin of life or abiogenesis is within the field of chemistry not biology. Evolution explains the diversity of life within the field of biology not chemistry.
And God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth after his kind"; and it was so.
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind; and God saw that it was good.
So why does Evolution sounds so weird for you then? You have it in the Bible!
If you add the fossile record + genetic map + your Bible + all now living creatures + you vill slowly see how it works. Dont try and argue with the word of God. Not a good thing to do. If he says Evolution is real, then it is.
No, it is not generally good. This whole thing was made up by Othniel C. Marsh in 1874, and proven wrong before the 1950's!! We are livging in the 21th... how come you be at least 50 years back in time?
Normally I'd indulge you with a bit of banter, but the fact that you attempt to use a Hovind video as proof? Laughable. The whole point of this video is a very simplified version of the forms. The actual radiation of forms is quite a bit more complex. Hence the commentary requesting a voice over to explain what is meant.
Your point? I'm assuming that there is one. of course. I've also noted you put up the old chestnut of peanut butter too. Perhaps you think that these mean anything to someone capable of critical thought?
I put it up to start arguments. Do not attack the messanger, but his message? I think you have failed to do that so far. Where is Hovind wrong at what he is saying?
WELL DONE good info and well organized
mrnehao 3 months ago
Really Eohippus is not the earliest ancestor, its Sifrhippus witch is much older then Eohippus.
horse14t 2 years ago
cute kid someone should take her to the Smithsonian In DC. their evolution exhibit pretty much denies what is depicted.
mejc2 2 years ago
Some of you people need to pick up A book, not THE book....
coolintruddle 2 years ago 7
150 years ago Darwin did not know what genes and DNA were; Arguing with Modern Evolution is a waste of time. Finding Gods connection with evolution makes a little more sense, Read the book finding Darwins God by Ken Miller a biologist who believes in God. The theory of evolution is no different from any other scientific theory, If you want evedence look at the fossile record.
maxhotchkiss1 2 years ago
This is all true. I own horses they have these things called chestnuts on the inside of the knee showing where some of there toes went.
You cant prove or disprove God through science because science only studies our physical reality; it has nothing to do with our non-physical reality. Nothing in Biology makes sense without evolution.
maxhotchkiss1 2 years ago 14
@maxhotchkiss1 I agree with you totally as an agnost myself. However: Science does proove itself, while religion does not. More and more things we find support science, and contradict or do not support religion. Let's take a wild guess as to which part MIGHT most likely be right, shall we?
AngelBiLove 9 months ago
@maxhotchkiss1 true, Intelligent Design and Young Earth Creationist organisations often misrepresent evolution by stating that it does not explain the origin of life. This is a dishonest tactic. Of course the theory of evolution doesn't explain the origin of life. It is not supposed to. The origin of life or abiogenesis is within the field of chemistry not biology. Evolution explains the diversity of life within the field of biology not chemistry.
ShiBluWolf 8 months ago
I drew on a peace of paper one time and said that it was evidence of God!
I was really suprised when no one believed me!
I figured out the problem though.........
I should have made a computer generated model of him, then everyone would believe the evidence!
How could I have been so stupid?
jls201 2 years ago
Well...how would you know what to draw?
As far as i know we have not found any fossils of God : )
So its a problem to imagine the evolution for God. We cant just make stuff up.
daarco2 2 years ago
Not a surprise, you missed the point!
Where are the "transitional" fossils between any two "different kinds"?
Not horse to horse, which actually supports the bible, but horse to....... aything other than a horse kind!
Try it without CG this time.
jls201 2 years ago
Ehh....im not following you here?
Every fossile is a transitional fossile. If i died today and become a fossile, i would be a transitional fossile between human and future humans.
daarco2 2 years ago
Human + future = future human!
Bird + future = future bird!
Amazing, the bible comes to that same conclusion!
Genesis 1:24-25
And God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth after his kind"; and it was so.
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind; and God saw that it was good.
jls201 2 years ago
So why does Evolution sounds so weird for you then? You have it in the Bible!
If you add the fossile record + genetic map + your Bible + all now living creatures + you vill slowly see how it works. Dont try and argue with the word of God. Not a good thing to do. If he says Evolution is real, then it is.
daarco2 2 years ago
Small changes within the KINDS, observable and in the bible.
BUT
One KIND changing into another KIND, NOT observable and Not in the bible!
The Bible and evolution....NOT compatible!
They were all CREATED seperate from the beginning.
jls201 2 years ago
Comment removed
MarlinMr 2 years ago
Generally ok, but really could've used a voice over or narration to explain things.
magick205 2 years ago
No, it is not generally good. This whole thing was made up by Othniel C. Marsh in 1874, and proven wrong before the 1950's!! We are livging in the 21th... how come you be at least 50 years back in time?
MarlinMr 2 years ago
Normally I'd indulge you with a bit of banter, but the fact that you attempt to use a Hovind video as proof? Laughable. The whole point of this video is a very simplified version of the forms. The actual radiation of forms is quite a bit more complex. Hence the commentary requesting a voice over to explain what is meant.
magick205 2 years ago
Go back to my video and read the first sentence in the info part -.-
MarlinMr 2 years ago
Your point? I'm assuming that there is one. of course. I've also noted you put up the old chestnut of peanut butter too. Perhaps you think that these mean anything to someone capable of critical thought?
magick205 2 years ago
I put it up to start arguments. Do not attack the messanger, but his message? I think you have failed to do that so far. Where is Hovind wrong at what he is saying?
MarlinMr 2 years ago